the eyes see what the ears hear: dissonance between looking at and listening to objects and spaces

13
54 54 ‘The eyes see what the ears hear.’ David Lynch  1 ‘Nihil est in intellectu, quod non fuerit in sensu, excipe: nisi ipse intellectus.’ Leibnitz  2  (Nothing is in the mind that was not in the senses, except the mind itself. ) Note: how the reader listens to the linked sounds in this article is a matter of contingency and convenience. For optimum listening use a good quality sound system and speakers, and a ‘na tural’ level of volume –do not over-amplify. Headphones can tend to focus on par ticular sound events and exclude ambient dynamics. In a glass case, in the musical instrument gallery of the recently remodell ed (2009) A shmolean Museum in Oxford, is the so-called ‘Messiah’ Stradivarius of 17 16, perhaps the mos t famous of all the Stradivarii, regarded a s being in a ‘new’ state as it has seldom b een played. One of the conditi ons of its bequest to the museum is that it remains in this condition. This is one of the most rareed objects in a rareed collection, and its sound-box, the source of much of its allure, is perhaps one of the most considered and mysterious sonic spaces in existence. Although unable to produce music, the sound-box resonates and amplies the sound of its enhanced surroundings.  1. Room 39, the Ashmolean Museum, Oxford In the X VI century gallery of the Wallace C ollection, a relative sonic oasis close to Ox ford Street in central London, the cool eroticism of the melancholic Portrait of Eleanor of Toledo, wife of Cosimo de Medici, by B ronzino (1 503-1 572) and famed for the ar tist’s rendering of her gown, hangs in juxtaposition to harsh walkie-talkie notications of ‘a pick -up at th e back do or’. 2. Eleanor of Toledo, (c. 1562-72), Bronzino, XVI Century Gallery, the Wallace Collection Busy major public contemporary spaces such as the turbine hall of Tate Modern are reminiscent The Ey es See What the Ears Hear Dissonance between looking at and listening to objects and spaces Andrew McNiven Artist /Lecturer: Senior Research Fellow in Visual Cultures, Zeppelin Universität, Friedric hshafen.

Upload: vincewarne

Post on 11-Oct-2015

136 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Originally published in engage 34: Experiencing Gallery ArchitectureAndrew McNiven describes a piece of research he undertook into the conditions of display in museums and galleries. Photography was used initially, but he was struck by the relationship between an object, a space and the sonic environment which they share, and soon turned to recording sound. Fascinated by the evocative nature of recordings made in the 1970s, he began creating his own archive of ‘soundscapes’ of museum and gallery environments. Although contemporary art practice has embraced sound as well as other sensory channels, this author takes the view that the modernist emphasis on the visual still dominates the design of exhibition spaces. Sound is still not actively considered as part of the experience, and hence the production of knowledge.

TRANSCRIPT

  • 5/21/2018 The Eyes See What the Ears Hear: Dissonance between looking at and listening to objects and spaces

    1/13

    5454

    The eyes see what the ears hear.

    David Lynch1

    Nihil est in intellectu, quod non fuerit in sensu,

    excipe: nisi ipse intellectus. Leibnitz2

    (Nothing is in the mind that was not in the senses,

    except the mind itself.)

    Note: how the reader listens to the linked sounds

    in this article is a matter of contingency and

    convenience. For optimum listening use a good

    quality sound system and speakers, and a natural

    level of volume do not over-amplify. Headphones

    can tend to focus on particular sound events and

    exclude ambient dynamics.

    In a glass case, in the musical instrument gallery

    of the recently remodelled (2009) Ashmolean

    Museum in Oxford, is the so-called Messiah

    Stradivarius of 1716, perhaps the most famous

    of all the Stradivarii, regarded as being in a new

    state as it has seldom been played. One of theconditions of its bequest to the museum is that it

    remains in this condition. This is one of the most

    rarefied objects in a rarefied collection, and its

    sound-box, the source of much of its allure,

    is perhaps one of the most considered and

    mysterious sonic spaces in existence. Although

    unable to produce music, the sound-box resonates

    and amplifies the sound of its enhanced

    surroundings.

    1. Room 39, the Ashmolean Museum,

    Oxford

    In the XVI century gallery of the Wallace Collection,

    a relative sonic oasis close to Oxford Street in

    central London, the cool eroticism of the

    melancholic Portrait of Eleanor of Toledo, wife of

    Cosimo de Medici, by Bronzino (1503-1572) and

    famed for the artists rendering of her gown, hangs

    in juxtaposition to harsh walkie-talkie notifications

    of a pick-up at the back door.

    2. Eleanor of Toledo, (c. 1562-72), Bronzino,

    XVI Century Gallery, the Wallace CollectionBusy major public contemporary spaces such

    as the turbine hall of Tate Modern are reminiscent

    The Eyes SeeWhat the Ears HearDissonance between looking at and listening to objects and spaces

    Andrew McNiven

    Artist/Lecturer: Senior Research Fellow in Visual Cultures,

    Zeppelin Universitt, Friedrichshafen.

    https://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/01-messiah/s-b5fOu?in=engageinthevisualarts/sets/andrew-mcniven/s-b5fOuhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/01-messiah/s-b5fOu?in=engageinthevisualarts/sets/andrew-mcniven/s-b5fOuhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/01-messiah/s-b5fOu?in=engageinthevisualarts/sets/andrew-mcniven/s-b5fOuhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/2-eleanor-of-toledo-c-1562-72-bronzino-xvi-century-gallery-the-wallace-collectionhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/2-eleanor-of-toledo-c-1562-72-bronzino-xvi-century-gallery-the-wallace-collectionhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/2-eleanor-of-toledo-c-1562-72-bronzino-xvi-century-gallery-the-wallace-collectionhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/2-eleanor-of-toledo-c-1562-72-bronzino-xvi-century-gallery-the-wallace-collectionhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/2-eleanor-of-toledo-c-1562-72-bronzino-xvi-century-gallery-the-wallace-collectionhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/2-eleanor-of-toledo-c-1562-72-bronzino-xvi-century-gallery-the-wallace-collectionhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/01-messiah/s-b5fOu?in=engageinthevisualarts/sets/andrew-mcniven/s-b5fOuhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/01-messiah/s-b5fOu?in=engageinthevisualarts/sets/andrew-mcniven/s-b5fOu
  • 5/21/2018 The Eyes See What the Ears Hear: Dissonance between looking at and listening to objects and spaces

    2/13

    5555

    sonically of playgrounds, railway stations or

    massive receptions.

    3. Shibboleth, (2007), Doris Salcedo,

    Turbine Hall, Tate Modern

    Gallery 3 of Camden Arts Centre, due to its

    proximity to traffic lights on the A41 trunk road,sounds like the starting grid of a motor race every

    few minutes.

    4. Observation Point, (2012), Zoe Leonard,

    Gallery 4, Camden Arts Centre

    This is not to suggest that there is an ideal sonic

    environment for the display of art and materialculture, one which is cloistered and hushed.

    Museums and galleries are part of the social and

    cultural infrastructure of our society and as such

    reflect that society. Sound is a variable condition,

    difficult to control. It leaks, it pervades, it is

    omnipresent, it is inevitable. It resonates and

    disperses in the medium in which we co-exist. We

    are co-temporal with sound. It provides to us the

    knowledge that we are part of something moreexpansive than ourselves.

    In the early twenty-first century we create and

    experience both quantities and levels of sound that

    are unprecedented historically. It is noteworthy that

    the motivation of many early researchers into the

    sonic environmentper se approached the field in

    a bid to address these changes. The Canadiancomposer and environmentalist R. Murray Schafer

    established an educational and research group at

    https://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/03-turbine-hall-salcedohttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/03-turbine-hall-salcedohttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/03-turbine-hall-salcedohttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/03-turbine-hall-salcedohttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/04-camden-arts-centre-gall-iiihttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/04-camden-arts-centre-gall-iiihttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/04-camden-arts-centre-gall-iiihttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/04-camden-arts-centre-gall-iiihttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/04-camden-arts-centre-gall-iiihttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/04-camden-arts-centre-gall-iiihttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/03-turbine-hall-salcedohttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/03-turbine-hall-salcedo
  • 5/21/2018 The Eyes See What the Ears Hear: Dissonance between looking at and listening to objects and spaces

    3/13

    56 engage 34The Eyes See What the Ears Hear

    Simon Fraser University in Vancouver during the

    late 1960s and early 1970s, which sought toestablish a documentary archive of the sonic

    environment. It was called the World Soundscape

    Project (WSP). (The term soundscape was coined

    by Schafer to describe the existing sonic

    environment.) The WSP grew out of Schafers

    initial attempt to draw attention to the sonic

    environment through the study of noise pollution.

    The establishment of the WSP attracted a group of

    highly motivated young composers and students,

    and the group worked first on a detailed study of

    the immediate locale, published as The Vancouver

    Soundscape, and in 1973 the CBC Ideas radio series

    Soundscapes of Canada.This series is comprised of

    ten one-hour programmes and features extended

    excerpts of field recordings, regarded as a

    milestone in sound documentary practice.

    In 1975 a WSP research project made detailed

    investigations of the soundscape of five villages,

    one in each of Sweden, Germany, Italy, France and

    Scotland.3Schafers definitive soundscape text,

    The Soundscape: The Tuning of the World waspublished in 1977.4In this book Schafer defined

    the soundscape, analogous to the sonic landscape,

    and a term not just limited to pre-existing or

    ambient sounds in other words, it was able to

    be made, in the manner of landscape, artwork,

    musical composition or architecture, and therefore

    able to be managed and controlled. Emerging out

    of what he felt was increasing noise pollution,

    his approach was expansive rather than restrictive.

    He advocated a positive approach to the sonic

    environment involving education, sensitising

    listeners to the soundscape and effecting positive

    change through this. He calls this education

    clairaudience, literally clear hearing.5He advocated a

    culture of managing and organising sound through

    a clearer and more sensitive process of listening.

    My own involvement with sound developed during

    an Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC)-

    funded, practice-led doctoral research at

    Northumbria University, in which the conditions

    (both theoretical and physical) of display in the

    context of the museum and gallery were

    considered. Formal and informal installation

    photography was used initially, but this was largely

    superseded and replaced by sound recording.

    Sound shares a medium

    with the spaces andobjects in any recording.In approachingarchitecture and materialthrough auditory rather

    than visual means, anentirely different registerof present conditionsbecome known andunderstood.

  • 5/21/2018 The Eyes See What the Ears Hear: Dissonance between looking at and listening to objects and spaces

    4/13

    57

    Spending extended periods of time photographing

    art and material culture made me sensible to theambient conditions of the spaces and architecture

    in which they are displayed. I was particularly struck

    by the hum of a dehumidifier next to a Mondrian

    painting in the Scottish National Gallery of Modern

    Art in Edinburgh. I used my mobile phone to record

    the sound and listened to this on an iPod later.6

    5. Composition with Double Line andYellow, (1932), Piet Mondrian, Room 3

    (European Modernism), Scottish National

    Gallery of Modern Art, Edinburgh

    In this process of separation or dislocation,

    I became immediately struck by the relationship

    between an object, a space and the sonic

    environment which they share.

    It is important to note that where photography

    excludes, through the physics of its brief moment

    in time and the optical restrictions of lenses, sound

    is inclusive. There is leakage from the entire

    ambient sonic environment of a space, and this

    cannot be easily excluded. Sound shares a mediumwith the spaces and objects in any recording. In

    approaching architecture and material through

    auditory rather than visual means, an entirely

    different register of present conditions become

    known and understood. In terms of the museum,

    these can be at odds with the idea of a what could

    be called a projected proper or even appropriate

    sonic environment and reality the ubiquity of the

    squelch of walkie-talkies in many major museums

    providing the soundtrack to a history of the worlds

    art, or the bing-bong of a lift resonating througha sequestered Stradivarius.7

    In addition, sound allows for something of the

    temporality of the conditions of display to be

    captured. In many cases this is unstable and

    shifting in character and this instability and these

    shifts are inevitably part of the processes of

    reception, excluded from the photographic record.8

    Ambient sound and conditions of display

    My initial practice involving sound focused on ideas

    of temporal and spatial displacement. Having made

    online requests for ambient recordings of gallery

    spaces, I made contact with a sound engineer who

    had worked on a (now lost) documentary film

    about Pop Art, and the work of Warhol and

    Lichtenstein in particular, made in the early 1970s,

    some of which had been shot in the galleries

    of the Museum of Modern Art in New York.

    As soundman he had recorded what are known

    as atmos (atmosphere) tracks which are simply

    the present ambient sounds of the location being

    filmed. These can be used in the final editingprocess to provide a simple and authentic textured

    background sound atmosphere for any sequence

    of film. Their use is ubiquitous in most film and

    television production. He offered these recordings

    to me to use in my research and practice.

    That they were made in the Museum of Modern

    Art was critical, but I was struck as much by the

    point in time when the recordings were made.

    https://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/05-modernismhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/05-modernismhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/05-modernismhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/05-modernismhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/05-modernismhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/05-modernismhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/05-modernismhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/05-modernismhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/05-modernismhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/05-modernismhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/05-modernism
  • 5/21/2018 The Eyes See What the Ears Hear: Dissonance between looking at and listening to objects and spaces

    5/13

    58 engage 34The Eyes See What the Ears Hear

    They were made in 1972, at the very end of the

    modernist period.9

    They were made in a part of themuseum that was demolished in 1979 and now only

    exists in documentary form. The recordings were in

    poor shape due to tape deterioration, and sections

    had been lost, so only relatively short fragments

    remained, like the persistence of scent in a Roman

    perfume bottle, sealed for hundreds of years then

    re-opened, a tangible trace of something long gone.

    The final sound installation allowed the viewer10

    an immediate and intimate access to a historically

    privileged space, far-removed temporally and

    spatially, what the art historian Mary Staniszewski

    has described as the ideological apparatus used

    to smooth and legitimate the initial passage of

    modernism into the United States and one of theprototypes of Brian ODohertys White Cube, at

    the very end of that period of (heroic) modernism

    during the 1970s.11

    6. Andrew McNiven, excerpt of Monkey

    Business No. 29, (2009), (Warhol, Lichtenstein,

    1972)

    CD player, amplifier, four speakers, looped ambient

    sound recording made in Room 15 of the Museum

    of Modern Art, 11 West 53rd Street, New York,

    (demolished 1979), June 17th 1972. Works by Andy

    Warhol: Untitled (Electric Chairs), (1971) and Roy

    Lichtenstein, Brushstrokes. (1967). Sound recording

    courtesy of Mark Tauman, Chicago. Gallery

    information label, perspex. Dimensions variable.

    Photograph: Ikuko Tsuchiya.

    The work invited the viewer to examine closely the

    space which art inhabits when on display, whilst atthe same time experiencing directly something of

    its archaeology and history.13This can be

    understood in the same terms as an installation

    photograph, a representation of a particular set of

    cultural circumstances the installation of these

    works at thissite at thistime which is revealing of

    the ideas about, and the methods of temporary

    display. Through evoking something of the

    phenomenological and sensory experience of

    being in a specific museum and looking at specific

    art, the intention was to create in the viewer a kind

    of temporal and geographical dislocation.

    Using ambient sound recording in a creative

    practice led me to consider more carefully therelationship between a document and its

    documented subject in terms of the conditions of

    display. Unlike a photograph, a sound recording

    undoes the stability of audience attention. In this

    sense, sound recording is a form of capture that

    fails to fix (render static) these conditions, and

    which therefore, reinstates and reproduces,to an extent, something of the original interplay

    (between space, object and viewer) in the

    processes of reception.

    7. The Bride Stripped Bare by her Bachelors,

    Even (The Large Glass), (1915-23), Marcel

    Duchamp, reconstruction by Richard Hamilton

    1965-6, lower panel remade 1985, TateModern

    https://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/06-monkey-business-29-excerpthttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/06-monkey-business-29-excerpthttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/06-monkey-business-29-excerpthttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/06-monkey-business-29-excerpthttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/06-monkey-business-29-excerpthttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/06-monkey-business-29-excerpthttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/07-bride-duchamphttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/07-bride-duchamphttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/07-bride-duchamphttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/07-bride-duchamphttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/07-bride-duchamphttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/07-bride-duchamphttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/07-bride-duchamphttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/07-bride-duchamphttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/07-bride-duchamphttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/07-bride-duchamphttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/07-bride-duchamphttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/07-bride-duchamphttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/06-monkey-business-29-excerpthttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/06-monkey-business-29-excerpthttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/06-monkey-business-29-excerpt
  • 5/21/2018 The Eyes See What the Ears Hear: Dissonance between looking at and listening to objects and spaces

    6/13

    59

    I recorded specifically (and continue to record) the

    sonic conditions of museums and art spaces of allkinds from the institutional to the alternative to

    create an archive of these conditions. Almost all

    the spaces were purpose-built or adapted and

    directed to the display of art and material culture,

    with a few exceptions, such as the Freud Museum.

    The choice of site was determined by the

    relationship between the object and its site;

    the architecture, the external influences, the

    consideration (or lack thereof) of the sonic

    conditions through management or design,

    or the iconic nature of the site or work. It is an

    architecture of predominantly hard surfaces,

    acoustically reflective and amplifying, often

    precluding a closeness or intimacy within the

    spaces and therefore with the work they host,

    distorting ideas of distance and often affecting

    communication with others and through this

    determining patterns of behaviour.

    Being with not looking at

    It was possible, through a process of critical

    reflection and seminar discussions withundergraduate and postgraduate students

    from Northumbria University, to come to some

    conclusions around this documentary-based

    practice The experience of listening to a sound

    recording of a gallery or museum space places

    the viewer securely in that space; unlike

    photography which easily isolates viewers from

    their surroundings, with the unrestricted capture

    available in a sound recording, it is difficult to

    imagine that one is elsewhere. Recorded and

    reproduced sound reflects the co-relation of object,viewer and context, and demonstrates something

    of the phenomenological aspects of experiencing

    architectural spaces and the material on display.

    Creating sound documents of exhibitions shifts our

    attention away from the ocularcentric aspects of

    display; in focusing on the sonic envelope of an

    exhibition space, the knowledge of display is

    suspended within our expanded awareness of the

    wider sensual range of exhibition experience.14

    8. Room 9 (Jeff Koons), Pop Life: Art in a

    Material World, 2009, Tate Modern

    Consideration of sound recording as an art practice

    and in relation to photography, led me to ideas that

    relate sound with spaces and objects, speculating

    that a space or an object might experience the

    display process. The sound practice could then

    be said to side with the spaces, objects and the

    processes of display it represents, being with rather

    than looking at.

    A literary precedent for this creative siding is theFrench prose-poet Francis Ponges (1899-1988)

    writing, especiallyLe parti pris deschoses,

    published in 1942, which has previously been

    translated as The Voice of Things,but more

    recently, and perhaps more usefully, as Siding With

    Things.15Ponge takes the side of specified objects

    in the material world - doorknobs, figs, crates,

    blackberries, stoves, water. He elaborates their

    view and the world they inhabit. He does not

    https://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/08-pop-life-koons?in=engageinthevisualarts/sets/andrew-mcniven/s-b5fOuhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/08-pop-life-koons?in=engageinthevisualarts/sets/andrew-mcniven/s-b5fOuhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/08-pop-life-koons?in=engageinthevisualarts/sets/andrew-mcniven/s-b5fOuhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/08-pop-life-koons?in=engageinthevisualarts/sets/andrew-mcniven/s-b5fOuhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/08-pop-life-koons?in=engageinthevisualarts/sets/andrew-mcniven/s-b5fOu
  • 5/21/2018 The Eyes See What the Ears Hear: Dissonance between looking at and listening to objects and spaces

    7/13

    60 engage 34The Eyes See What the Ears Hear

    anthropomorphise these inanimate or insentient

    objects but simply reflects something of theirstuff. In the words of Margaret Guiton, one of his

    English translators, his work is nourished by

    things.16

    In Le Parti pris des choses,(The Pleasures of the

    Door) from Le parti pris de choses, he both sides

    and sounds: With a friendly hand you hold on a bit

    longer, before firmly pushing it back and shuttingyourself in of which you are agreeably assured by

    the click of the powerful, well-oiled latch.17

    9. Latch

    Through further critical reflection and speculation,

    I propose that through this process of siding, the

    viewer/listener can be exhorted to be complicitwith the spaces and the objects rather than with

    the institutional or cultural context, and through

    this, to be more sensible to the conditions of

    display. In placing the shared aural experience

    (shared between the recorder, the recorded and

    the viewer) at the centre of the practice, rather

    than marginalising or ignoring ambient sound,the wider conditions of display can be experienced

    distinctly, shifting something of the processes of

    reception and therefore the production of

    knowledge.

    Contemporary museums often seek to sequester

    themselves from the external environment, but are

    punctuated and infiltrated by external sounds andsmells of traffic and the contemporary world, as

    well as with the sensory clamour generated by

    visitors: the squelch of walkie-talkies, or the low-

    level murmured fizz of audiotours, the (oftendigitally reproduced) clicking of cameras, the

    squeal of sneakers, the lurid colours of visitors

    clothes, a Babel of languages, co-mingled

    odours, and what James Joyce called the pale

    phosphorescence of farts. (Equally, absolute

    stillness and the absence of others are factors,

    the solitary viewer and solitary invigilator being,

    sometimes, for some viewers, an inhibiting

    experience.) These all influence the processes

    of display and reception and it is important

    to consider the museum as a multi-sensory

    environment. We have to go back to a period

    when emphasis was placed on the analysis of style

    and form and the discrete work of art, notably the

    writing of Heinrich Wlfflin and the Second Vienna

    School, or the photographic representations of

    visual culture in Andr Malrauxs (1901-1976) La

    Muse Imaginaireto find a critical discourse that

    fully dissociated context from meaning in art.18

    Multi-sensory knowledge

    Michel Serres in Le Cinq Sens: philosophie descorps mles (The Five Senses: The Philosophy of

    Mingled Bodies, 1985: trans.:1998) writes of our

    dependency on language as the mediator of

    knowledge and understanding. Serres describes

    the body as receptive and subtle, preferring the

    idea of a topology (rather than a geometry) of

    knowledge. He appropriates Aristotles idea of

    sixth sense, the quasi-sensesensus communis,

    which mediates the other senses, and identifies this

    https://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/09-latch?in=engageinthevisualarts/sets/andrew-mcniven/s-b5fOuhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/09-latch?in=engageinthevisualarts/sets/andrew-mcniven/s-b5fOuhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/09-latch?in=engageinthevisualarts/sets/andrew-mcniven/s-b5fOu
  • 5/21/2018 The Eyes See What the Ears Hear: Dissonance between looking at and listening to objects and spaces

    8/13

    61

    with the skin. Serres uses lists and formal devices

    to evoke the complexity of sensuality rather than,as is common in most theoretical writing, seeking a

    precise word or term. He speaks of sensory stimuli

    fanning-out, diffusing, broadcasting, infiltrating,

    to suggest the elusive qualities of the sensual.

    Serres approach is, to an extent, reiterated by

    Christoph Menke. Writing in 2012 in a discussion

    of art as knowledge versus art as surface (andspeculating that both positions are wrong), Menke

    emphasises that art should (still) be regarded as

    a phenomenon beyond theoretical and rational

    control.19In referring to Nietzsche, he points out

    that art is about play, chaos, ecstasy, coincidence,

    materiality and life, factors in what could be called

    arts production of knowledge which are notconditional on language.20

    Recent work has challenged the cultural

    dominance of vision, supporting the idea of sound

    as a medium that has both documentary and

    creative potential. Casey OCallaghan and Mathew

    Nudds (2010) write that No topic in extra-visual

    philosophy of perception has generated as muchattention in recent years as that of sounds and

    audition.21They go on to state:

    More important, however, it signals a departure

    from the tradition of relying upon vision as the

    representative paradigm for theorizing about

    perception, its objects, and its content. While the

    implicit assumption has been that accounts of

    visual perception and visual experience generalize

    to the other senses, nothing guarantees that what

    is true of seeing holds of touching, tasting, orhearing. Intuitions about critical issues or particular

    cases might differ in the context of different

    modalities. While it might seem obvious in the case

    of vision that perceptual experience is transparent,

    or that space is required for objectivity, gustatory

    and olfactory experiences might tell otherwise

    (see, e.g., Lycan 2000; A. D. Smith 2002).22

    Dan Flavin, one of the artists who emerged from the

    ocularcentric shadow of Greenbergian modernism,

    was reluctant to consider the unavoidable buzz and

    hum made by his fluorescent light works and these

    sounds were, of course, invisible in the photographic

    installation shots used to represent and disseminate

    his work.

    10. Untitled(Marfa Project), (1996),

    Dan Flavin

    One of the legacies of modernism is the resolute

    visuality that still dominates the design and

    practices of the contemporary museum, its staging

    of practice, its management of site and material,and its modes of display. This is in contrast to

    strands of development in artists practice through

    the postmodern period which both question and

    are suspicious of the privileging of, or emphasis on,

    the purely visual or the single viewpoint. Hans

    Haackes unrealised Norbert: All Systems Goof

    1970-1, Wolfgang Laibs beeswax structures, or

    Bruce Naumanns 2004Raw Materialsin Tate

    Moderns Turbine Hall are unrelated examples.

    https://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/10-flavin-marfa?in=engageinthevisualarts/sets/andrew-mcniven/s-b5fOuhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/10-flavin-marfa?in=engageinthevisualarts/sets/andrew-mcniven/s-b5fOuhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/10-flavin-marfa?in=engageinthevisualarts/sets/andrew-mcniven/s-b5fOuhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/10-flavin-marfa?in=engageinthevisualarts/sets/andrew-mcniven/s-b5fOuhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/10-flavin-marfa?in=engageinthevisualarts/sets/andrew-mcniven/s-b5fOuhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/10-flavin-marfa?in=engageinthevisualarts/sets/andrew-mcniven/s-b5fOu
  • 5/21/2018 The Eyes See What the Ears Hear: Dissonance between looking at and listening to objects and spaces

    9/13

    62 engage 34The Eyes See What the Ears Hear

    This legacy is expressed through museum and

    gallery architecture which accommodates manyof these shifts easily, almost by default, or simply by

    square acreage. However, the exclusion or co-option

    of non-visual parts of the sensory register is often

    contingent, and certainly open to question.

    In considering the contribution made to my

    recordings by the architecture and spaces

    themselves, it is difficult not to conclude that this isarbitrary. In other words, the sound environment

    has not been considered actively, as in the

    remodeling of the Ashmolean, or if considered,

    through acoustically sympathetic materials, for

    example, it is localised and exerts little overall

    effect. In the case of larger museums, the sonic

    conditions contribute to a strong sense of themonumental institution, with little opportunity

    for the intimate or tuned experience.23

    In place of such unintended reluctance, rooted

    perhaps in the aesthetic impulses of modernism,

    the approach of R. Murray Schafer, and others,

    outlined earlier - a culture of managing and

    organising sound through a clearer and moresensitive process of listening - suggests an

    approach within the museum and in museum

    practices in which the wider sensual register,

    and in particular the sonic, is considered in relation

    to architecture, exhibition design, and day-to-day

    management: an approach to art, material culture

    and its display in which, as much as the visualcontext, the sonic conditions are considered to

    be a factor in the production of knowledge.

    11. Metopes, Pediments and Frieze from

    the Parthenon, Athens (The Elgin Marbles),Room 18, the British Museum, London

    Coda: Sigmund Freud

    12. Freuds Desk

    The study in the Freud Museum, in his former

    home in Hampstead, north London, is the room in

    which he died. It includes the couch Freud used for

    treating patients a symbol of psychoanalysis, and

    to some an object of veneration. The soundscape

    of helicopters, traffic, giggly visitors, loud telephones

    and leaked audio-visual programmes, is sometimes

    at complete odds with the rooms and the objects

    history and its production of meaning.

    A recording was made by placing a microphoneinside the front right-hand drawer of Sigmund

    Freuds desk in the study. The intention was to

    demonstrate the sonic conditions experienced by

    the desk as it now exists, within a museum, and

    place it firmly, through sound practice, within

    material culture. This is the same desk that

    resonated to the sound of Freuds voice and thoseof his patients, the motions of his pen as he wrote

    and other sounds associated with him, both

    intimate and public, perhaps even sounds of his

    death. The present sound environment in which

    it exists includes a particularly jarring telephone

    ringing tone, the commentary of visitors, the

    sound of an audio-visual display elsewhere

    within the museum looping GlucksEurydice

    and the sounds associated with people moving

    https://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/11-bm-elginmarbles/s-b5fOu?in=engageinthevisualarts/sets/andrew-mcniven/s-b5fOuhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/11-bm-elginmarbles/s-b5fOu?in=engageinthevisualarts/sets/andrew-mcniven/s-b5fOuhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/11-bm-elginmarbles/s-b5fOu?in=engageinthevisualarts/sets/andrew-mcniven/s-b5fOuhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/11-bm-elginmarbles/s-b5fOu?in=engageinthevisualarts/sets/andrew-mcniven/s-b5fOuhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/12-freud-desk/s-4iYkK?in=engageinthevisualarts/sets/andrew-mcniven/s-b5fOuhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/12-freud-desk/s-4iYkK?in=engageinthevisualarts/sets/andrew-mcniven/s-b5fOuhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/11-bm-elginmarbles/s-b5fOu?in=engageinthevisualarts/sets/andrew-mcniven/s-b5fOuhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/11-bm-elginmarbles/s-b5fOu?in=engageinthevisualarts/sets/andrew-mcniven/s-b5fOuhttps://soundcloud.com/engageinthevisualarts/11-bm-elginmarbles/s-b5fOu?in=engageinthevisualarts/sets/andrew-mcniven/s-b5fOu
  • 5/21/2018 The Eyes See What the Ears Hear: Dissonance between looking at and listening to objects and spaces

    10/13

    63

    around a space of that kind - the creak of parquet,

    for example.24

    The effect of placing the microphone in the desk

    was significant; it picked up sound resonating

    through the desk as well as the air, so the soundswere muffled, distorted, sometimes indistinct.

    The sonic atmosphere created could be described

    as dark, even malevolent, suggesting something

    hidden or concealed. It also contains narrative

    elements, with distinct events occurring

    throughout the 19-minute recording. The work

    forefronts the object, Freuds desk, as one of theprimary sites of his activity (the other, his couch,

    was a few feet away) and the work demonstrates

    what the object experienced - the room, its

    activity and the processes of the museum. It could

    be considered analogous to the point-of-view

    shot in cinema, an analogy assisted by the diegetic

    nature of the sound. (Sound in film is termeddiegetic if it is part of the narrative sphere of the

    film. For instance, if a character in the film is

    playing a piano the resulting sound is diegetic.

    If, on the other hand, music plays in the

    background but cannot be heard by the films

    characters, it is termed extra-diegetic.) Through

    this process, the objects own agency, its active

    presence emerges, as it stands and filters its

    present sonic conditions.

  • 5/21/2018 The Eyes See What the Ears Hear: Dissonance between looking at and listening to objects and spaces

    11/13

    64 engage 34The Eyes See What the Ears Hear

    Notes

    1. The Air is on Fire,Fondation Cartier pour lartcontemporain, 2007

    2. Leibnitz, G., New Essays on Human

    Understanding, Book II, Ch1, 2 1704

    3. Excerpts available through the British Library

    here:http://britishlibrary.typepad.co.uk/

    sound-and-vision/2013/07/five-european-villages.html

    4. Schafer, R. M. (1977)The Tuning of the World,

    New York: Knopf. (Reprinted asOur Sonic

    Environment and the Soundscape: The Tuning of

    the World,Destiny Books, 1994).

    5. Schafers legacy is apparent in projects such asthe London Sound Survey: http://www.

    soundsurvey.org.ukor the British Librarys UK

    Sound Map:http://sounds.bl.uk/Sound-Maps/

    UK-Soundmap

    6. I came to consider this sound as the hum of

    modernism.

    7. This is not to argue for what Walter Benjamin

    termed the auratic in museum conditions.

    8. There are of course many efforts to document

    exhibitions using both images, sound and the

    temporal, from film to VR (video recording). In the

    context of this article however, and the relationship

    between sound and display, it is important tonarrow the sound register.

    9. And in the same week as the Watergate burglary

    in Washington DC.

    10. I have maintained use of the term viewer and

    its active sense in this text to indicate a museum or

    gallery attendee, whether they actuallyview or not,

    for sake of clarity and consistency.

    11. Staniszewski, M.A. (1998)The Power of Display:

    A History of Exhibition Installations at the Museum

    of Modern Art, Cambridge, MA and London: MIT

    Press. p. 70

    12. Monkey business is a reference to Donald

    Judds Statement for the Chinati Foundation

    (1986) in which he states (of temporary installation

    in relation to permanent installation) It takes a

    great deal of time and thought to install workcarefully. This should not always be thrown away...

    Otherwise art is only show and monkey business.

    Judd, D. (1987) Complete Writings 1975-1986,

    Eindhoven: Van Abbemuseum. P111

    13. A note on installation: soundworks are

    reproduced as close as possible to original sound

    levels, at a 1:1 scale. This avoids theatricality andblends with existing ambient sounds, which tend

    to support and enhance rather than interfere.

    14. The process of making recordings has produced

    some interesting collateral consequences. In

    seeking to exclude my own sounds from the

    recording I wait until my breathing is steady and

    quiet after walking around say - and will stand

    still, relaxed, legs slightly apart, hands behind my

    http://britishlibrary.typepad.co.uk/sound-and-vision/2013/07/five-european-villages.htmlhttp://britishlibrary.typepad.co.uk/sound-and-vision/2013/07/five-european-villages.htmlhttp://britishlibrary.typepad.co.uk/sound-and-vision/2013/07/five-european-villages.htmlhttp://www.soundsurvey.org.uk/http://www.soundsurvey.org.uk/http://sounds.bl.uk/Sound-Maps/UK-Soundmaphttp://sounds.bl.uk/Sound-Maps/UK-Soundmaphttp://sounds.bl.uk/Sound-Maps/UK-Soundmaphttp://sounds.bl.uk/Sound-Maps/UK-Soundmaphttp://www.soundsurvey.org.uk/http://www.soundsurvey.org.uk/http://britishlibrary.typepad.co.uk/sound-and-vision/2013/07/five-european-villages.htmlhttp://britishlibrary.typepad.co.uk/sound-and-vision/2013/07/five-european-villages.htmlhttp://britishlibrary.typepad.co.uk/sound-and-vision/2013/07/five-european-villages.html
  • 5/21/2018 The Eyes See What the Ears Hear: Dissonance between looking at and listening to objects and spaces

    12/13

    65

    back and staring ahead, all so that I can avoid

    any movement and rustle of clothing or noisy

    breathing. I find I can stay like this for several

    minutes, and it is an unobtrusive pose. There is

    something of an air of self-conscious listening

    about it, perhaps with parallels in the self-

    conscious looking of the photographer.

    The unintended consequence is that in being

    still and quiet I start to share the physical dynamics

    of static objects around me; I am more sculpture

    than viewer. The affinity with the objects, the

    siding with things is enhanced. Whilst recording

    in the British Museum I had a very strong sense of

    being part of the community of objects, complicit

    with these.

    15. Ponge, F.Selected Poems, (1942, trans. 1994)Edited Margaret Guiton, with translations by

    Margaret Guiton, John Montague and C.K.

    Williams. London, Faber and Faber. 1998

    16. Ibid., page ix

    17. Ibid., p. 29(Dune main amicable il la reticent

    encore, avant le repousser dcidment et senclore,

    - ce donc le dclic du resort puissant mais bien huil

    agrblement lassure.)

    18. It is noteworthy that parts of MalrauxsLa

    Muse Imaginaire were published in the UK asThe

    Voices of Silence.

    19. Christoph Menke, Brauchen wir Kunst?

    Documenta Brauchen wir Kunst? Und wenn ja,

    wozu? Kassel hat die Documenta erffnet und eine

    aufregende Kontroverse ber zeitgenssische

    Werke entfacht, Die ZEIT, (23.06.2012):5

    20. Writing of Catherine Bodners 2002-2004

    installation Bounce, an empty space filled with the

    scent of air-freshener, Jim Drobnick observes that:

    For the artist, who originally hails from Switzerland,

    the scent of Bounce is noticeably North American.

    It is a cultural artifact, as much as any other

    manufactured product, ... It also demonstrates thecapacity of the sensual to communicate and be

    understood, beyond language, in this case the

    knowledge and understanding of something

    explicitly North American. Drobnick, J. (2010)

    Airchitecture: Guarded Breaths and the [cough] Art

    of Ventilation in: Art, History and the Senses, eds.

    Patrizia di Bello and Gabriel Koureas, Ashgate Press,London.

    21. Callaghan, C. & Nudds, M. (2010)Sounds and

    Perception: New Philosophical Essays,Oxford:

    Oxford University Press. p.2

    22. Ibid., p2

    23. In some cases institutional sounds could beconsidered expensive or exclusive in the manner

    of the manufactured or engineered clunk used in

    the doors of expensive cars. The faintly fluid sound

    of parquet sounds distinct and expensive, as does

    the muffled swish of a large and heavy damped

    door mechanism.

  • 5/21/2018 The Eyes See What the Ears Hear: Dissonance between looking at and listening to objects and spaces

    13/13

    6666 engage 34The Eyes See What the Ears Hear

    24. Prior to the museum opening that morning,

    Anna Freuds study, where decorators were

    working, was filled with the Ken Bruce show on

    BBC Radio 2 : Popmaster and Showaddywaddy.

    Images

    1. Idealised Portrait of a Courtesan as Flora,

    (Lucrezia Borgia),Bartolomeo Veneto (c. 1520-25),

    Stdel Museum. Laser print, 13 x 10 cms, 2011.

    Photo: Andrew McNiven.

    2.Eleanor of Toledo,(c.1562-72), Bronzino, XVI

    Century Gallery, The Wallace Collection. Laser print,

    13 x 10 cms, 2011. Photo: Andrew McNiven.

    3. View of the writing desk in the study (detail),

    1938, silver gelatin print. Image: Edmund Engelman,

    courtesy Thomas Engelman.