the final ihr
TRANSCRIPT
International health regulations
BY: DR.KAVITA YADAVMODERATOR: DR. VIDYA G. S & DR.KAVITHA H .S JSSMCH,MYSORE
Plan of presentation
What is IHRHistory Comparison of 1969 and 2005 IHRPrinciples ,objectives and purpose of IHR IHR implementationHow successful IHR has beenIndian scenarioSummaryReferences
What are International Health Regulations (IHR)?
The International Health Regulations (IHR) are an
international legal instrument that is binding on 194 countries
across the globe, including all member states of the World
Health Organization (WHO). The United States is one of these member states.
IHR are intended to: help prevent the spread of disease across borders
outline the minimum requirements for functional public health system
that allows countries to quickly detect and respond to disease outbreaks in
their communities
History
1830s---New trade patterns allow cholera to spread from South Asia to Europe
and North America, leaving hundreds of thousands dead
1851--France convenes the first International Sanitary Conference to explore
agreement on harmonizing quarantine regulations for cholera, plague, and
yellow fever
1892--Delegates to the seventh conference ratify the first International Sanitary
Convention
1902 -1935--States create intergovernmental institutions [Pan American
Sanitary Bureau (1902), Health Organization of the League of Nations (1920)
Contd.
→ 1948--World Health Organization (and its governing body, the
World Health Assembly, WHA) created
→ 1951--WHA consolidates existing international sanitary
conventions into the singular International Sanitary Regulations
(covering plague, cholera, yellow fever, smallpox, typhus, relapsing
fever)
→ 1969--The renamed International Health Regulations (1969)
replace prior agreements; revisions eliminate but do not add diseases
KEY FEATURES OF IHR 1969
Notification to WHO of cases of cholera, plague smallpox and yellow fever
Certain health related rules for international travel and trade
Prescription of maximum border measures against cholera, plague and yellow fever (deratting, desinsection…)
Health documents for people, aircraft and ships.
LIMITATIONS OF IHR 1969
Concerns only cholera, plague and yellow fever The old paradigm of case-based surveillance Difficult to revise disease list
Dependent on official notification from the member stateNo incentives to notification
Very few notifications Notifications seemed as a very serious act by states
No formal mechanisms for collaboration between member state and WHO
No dynamic in the response for stopping international spread
Why new IHR
→ 1995--Ebola virus outbreak in Central Africa captures global
attention;WHA calls upon WHO Director-General to overhaul
the IHR
The recent increase in trade and tourism.
→ 2003--SARS spreads from China to 25 other countries via air
travel
→ 2005--WHA adopts the revised International Health
Regulations (2005)
IHR 1969 VERSUS IHR 2005
From three diseases to all public health risks
From preset measures to tailored response
From control of borders to also include containment at source
From reactive to proactive
International Health regulations (2005)10 Parts, 66 Articles, 9 Annexes
• PART I DEFINITIONS, PURPOSE AND SCOPE, PRINCIPLES AND RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITIES
• PART II INFORMATION AND PUBLIC HEALTH RESPONSE
• PART III RECOMMENDATIONS
• PART IV POINTS OF ENTRY
• PART V PUBLIC HEALTH MEASURES
• Chapter I General provisions
• Chapter II Special provisions for conveyances and conveyance operators
• Chapter III Special provisions for travellers
• Chapter IV Special provisions for goods, containers and container loading areas
• PART VI HEALTH DOCUMENTS
• PART VII CHARGES
• PART VIII GENERAL PROVISION
• PART IX THE ROSTER OF EXPERTS, THE EMERGENCY COMMITTEE AND THE REVIEW COMMITTEE
• Chapter I The IHR Roster of Experts
• Chapter II The Emergency Committee
• Chapter III The Review Committee
• PART X FINAL PROVISIONS
Purpose and scope
The purpose and scope of these Regulations are to
prevent, protect against, control and provide a public
health response to the international spread of disease in
ways that are commensurate with and restricted to public
health risks, and which avoid unnecessary interference
with international traffic and trade.
Principles
The implementation of these Regulations shall be with full respect for the
dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons.
The implementation of these Regulations shall be guided by the Charter of the
United Nations and the Constitution of the World Health Organization.
The implementation of these Regulations shall be guided by the goal of their
universal application for the protection of all people of the world from the
international spread of disease.
States have, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the
principles of international law, the sovereign right to legislate and to
implement legislation in pursuance of their health policies. In doing so they
should uphold the purpose of these Regulations
Objectives Of IHR 2005
To ensure the appropriate application of routine preventive measures (e.g. at ports and air ports) and the use by all countries of internationally approved documents (e.g. Vaccination certificate).
To ensure the notification to WHO of all events that may constitute a public health emergency of international concern.
The implementation of any temporary recommendations should the WHO Director General have determined that such an emergency is occurring.
The revised IHR also focus on the provision of support for affected states and the avoidance of stigma and unnecessary negative impact on international travel and trade.
IHR implementation
Strengthening national capacity for surveillance and control at port , airport, ground crossing and travel &transport.
Prevention ,alert and response to public health emergencies.
Global partnership.Rights, obligations ,procedure and progress monitoring.
1 Strengthening
national
capacity
Country’s liabilities
At point of entry: Under normal conditions At the time of
emergency
Establishment of national focal pointStrengthening of surveillance and reporting
system
For ships
Sanitary operation without harming ship and passengerCertificate is given free of chargeFree pratiqueSubjected to health inspection for hygiene and
sanitation,rodents/vermin infestation,drinking water availability and quality
Documents checked
Maritime declaration of health,Crew list and vaccination certificate of membersDeratting or deratting exemption certificateCertificate of health and sanitary inspectionCertificate showing date and time of pratiqueShip sanitation control certificateShip sanitation control exemption certificate
For people
Certificate of date of arrival or departureCertificate of health measures applied to him or his
baggageMay examin person before voyage if neededPerson under surveillance may be allowed to continue his
voyage but health authorities must be kept informedReview travel history in affected areaReview proof of medical examination,vaccination and lab
analysis
Contd.
Place a suspected person under observation.Implement quarantine or isolation or treatment as needed.May refuse entry of affected person.May refuse entry of unaffected person in affected area.Implement exit screening.Medical facilities for ill travellers.
Health measures for baggage, cargo, containers, conveyances, goods and postal parcels
• Review manifest, Proof of measures taken on departure or in transit, Routing and implement inspections
• Implement treatment to remove infection and contamination, vectors and reservoirs.
• Isolation and quarantine, seizure and destruction
• Refuse departure or entry.
Ground Crossing
States Parties sharing common borders should consider:(a) entering into bilateral or multilateral agreements or
arrangements concerning prevention or control of international transmission of disease at ground crossings in accordance with IHR
(b) joint designation of adjacent ground crossings for the capacities .
Categories Of These Reportable Diseases
• Epidemic prone diseases• Food borne diseases
• Accidental and deliberate outbreaks• Toxic chemical accidents• Radio nuclear Accidents• Environmental disasters
VACCINATION FOR TRAVELLERSCATEGORY VACCINES
ROUTINE IMMUNIZATION
Diphtheria, Tetanus, and Pertussis Hepatitis BHaemophilus influenzae type bHuman papillomavirus InfluenzaMeasles, mumps and rubellaPneumococcal diseasePoliomyelitisRotavirus Tuberculosis (BCG)Varicella
SELECTIVE USE FOR TRAVELLERS
CholeraHepatitis AJapanese encephalitisMeningococcal diseaseRabiesTick- borne encephalitisTyphoid feverYellow fever
MANDATORY VACCINATION
Yellow fever (according tovaccination country list)Meningococcal disease and polio(required by Saudi Arabia for pilgrims)
National IHR Focal Points (NFPs)
Important role in implementation of IHRThe national centre for communications with WHO:
On a 24/7 basis (by telephone, fax, email) NOT an individual person
To notify PHEIC to WHOTo respond to requests for verification of information of such
events. Support field investigations, provide early diagnosis and provide
technical guidance to states for timely and effective response to PHEIC
Co-ordination with state units and WHO
Strengthening of surveillance system
Each country is suppose to enhance its surveillance and reporting system so that diseases of international concern can be picked up at the earliest and hence controlled in a better way.
2 Prevention alert and response to PHEIC
Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC)
An extraordinary public health event whichconstitutes a public health
risk to other countries through international spread of disease
potentially requires a coordinated international response
Events detected by national surveillance system or reported by media or any non-governmental organization
UNUSUAL DISEASESSmallpoxHuman influenzae (new subtype)Wild poliovirusSevere acute respiratory syndrome
KNOWN EPIDEMIC PRONE DISEASESCholeraPneumonic plagueViral haemorrhagic fevers(ebola,lasaa)Yellow feverWest Nile feverOther locally or regionally important diseases
Any event of potential internation
al public health
concern
Is the public health impact of the event serious?Is the event unusual or unexpected?Is there significant risk of international spread?Is there significant risk of travel or trade restriction?
National IHR focal point to notify WHO
If yes to any two of these questions
3 GLOBAL
PARTNERSHIP AND INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION
The IHR foster global partnership
Other intergovernmental organizations: UN system (e.g. FAO, IAEA, ICAO, IMO) others: regional (e.g. EU, ASEAN), technical (e.g. OIE)
Development agencies: governments, banks
WHO Collaborating centresAcademics & professional associationsIndustry associationsNGOs and Foundations
Global distribution of GOARN institutions and partners
A network of more than 150 technical institutions, WHO manages secretariat and logistic support
GOARN
Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network (GOARN) provides a framework for the technical coordination of international alert and response activities with institutions and countries around the world.
They lay out new obligations devised to collectively respond to international public health challenges of the 21st century, taking advantage of new developments in biotechnology, surveillance systems, and information technology, such as rapid data sharing.
4 RIGHTS,OBLI
G-ATIONS AND PROCEDURES,PROGRESS MONITORING
According to the IHR (2005), what arethe key obligations for WHO?
Laying down the rules for global public health security
Monitoring the implementation of IHR (2005) and
updating guidelines so that they remain scientifically
valid and consistent with changing requirements.
Major Obligations for Member States
Assess events
& notify potentialPHEIC
Response
Core capacities to detect, report and respond
Legal & administrative
framework
Designation ofNational IHRFocal Point
Major Obligations
Benefits to Member States
• Being a partner in the international effort to maintain global health security.
Core capacities will be strengthened to report and respond to public health risks and a PHEIC in the country.
Clear guidelines on outbreak verification process, technical and logistical support will be provided by WHO upon request in the case of a PHEIC.
Be eligible for support from Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network (GOARN).
WHO emphasizes an amicable settlement of differences through, negotiation, mediation, conciliation and arbitration.
Implications of non-compliance to IHR
• WHO will know from other sources
Position of the State Party will change from article 6
(notification) to article 10 (verification)
WHO will request verification
WHO will embark on investigation based on risk
assessment
IHR allow WHO to use whatever available information
to alert other partners
Barriers to implementation
TechnicalResourcesGovernanceLegalPolitical
How successful has the IHR system been?
The system has been very successful when we consider
the number of events notified to WHO under regulations.
>220 events worldwide were formally notified to WHO and posted
on the secure IHR website as meeting at least 2 of the 4 risk
assessment criteria.
Hundreds of more postings on a secure IHR website for information
exchange on events between countries, which could include
information about event response measures taken.
Indian scenario
The Stakeholders for IHR Implementation
Airports,Ports & Ground
Crossings
States, UTs &
DistrictAuthorities
National Focal PointNICD, Delhi
Other Ministries,
& Deptts.
MOHFW
DGHS
India and IHR
National Focal Point: NICDSurveillance:IDSP (Rs.408 CRORE)Legal: The Public Health Act of India has been drafted Indian Port Health Rules and Indian Aircraft (Public
Health) Rules are currently being examined for their compliance with IHR (2005).
National - Epidemic Disease Act -1987 . Disaster Management Act 2005
Contd.
Lab: 2 bio safety level (BSL) —one at the NICD, Delhi and second at National Institute of Virology, Pune.
Connectivity: In collaboration with the ISRO, the National Informatics Centre and BSNL, districts are being connected electronically through satellite and the terrestrial network for transmission of surveillance data, videoconferencing and distance learning
PoE: 25 million international passengers pass through India via 21 international airports, 12 ports and 3 major land border crossings yearly.
Summary
What is IHR.What are its principles , objectives and scope.How it is implemented.What are the responsibilities of WHO and the
state parties.Where India stands.
REFERENCES
World Health Organization. International health regulations (1969). 3rd ed. Geneva:World Health Organization; 1983. Available at http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/1983/9241580070.pd
WHO, International Health Regulation (2005): Geneva, World Health Organization; 2006. The World Health Organization, fifty – eight World Health Assembly Resolution WHA 58.3: Revision
of the International Health Regulation, 23 may 2005. Available at http: // www.who.int/ ebwho/pdf.files/WHA 58 /WHA58.3-en pdf.
WHO, International Travel and Health. World Health Organization; January 2007. annex 2, 213. WHO, International Travel and Health. World Health Organization; January 2011. Chapter 6, 82-142. Narain Jai P, Lal S, Garg R. Implementing the Revised International Health Regulations in India. The
National Medical J India 2007; 20 (5) : 221- 23. David P. Fidler. From International Sanitary Conventions to Global Health Security: The New
International Health Regulations. Chinese Journal of International Law (2005), Vol. 4, No. 2, 325–392. Downloaded from oxfordjournals.org.
URL: http://www.port-health.org/sanitation/index Implementation of the International Health Regulations (2005). Report of the Review Committee on
the Functioning of the International Health Regulations (2005) in relation to Pandemic (H1N1) 2009. Report by the Director-General.
Mankar M, Pinto V. International Health Regulation. Bombay Hospital Journal,2009; 51; 2:222-28.