the first stars and hypernovae
DESCRIPTION
The First Stars and Hypernovae. K. Nomoto (Univ. of Tokyo). M > 10 5 M : SMS (Super Massive Stars) GR instability Collapse M ~ 300 - 10 5 M : VMO (Very Massive Objects) Nuclear Instability Pulsational Mass Loss M ~ 130 - 300M : Pair Creation Instability - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
The First Stars and Hypernovae The First Stars and Hypernovae
K. Nomoto (Univ. of Tokyo)
M > 105M:SMS (Super Massive Stars) GR instability Collapse
M ~ 300 - 105M: VMO (Very Massive Objects) Nuclear Instability Pulsational Mass Loss
M ~ 130 -300M: Pair Creation Instability Collapse Nuclear Explosion
M ~ 8 -130M: Fe core Collapse
Hypernovae BH
SNe II NS
• First Stars (Pop III Stars)
• First Supernovae (Type II, Ibc, Hypernovae, Pair)
• Early Cosmic Chemical Evolution– AGB Stars– Supernovae (Type Ia)
• Abundance Ratios @high z, low Z• EMP (Extremely Metal-Poor) Stars: Halo, dSph• DLA• ICM, …
-elements: [(O, Mg, Si, S, Ar, Ca)/Fe], [Si/O]– Fe-peak elements: [(Ti, Cr, Mn, Co, Ni, Zn)/Fe]– R-process, s-process elements
Cosmic Clock
Galactic Chemical Evolution[Fe/H]=log(Fe/H) -log(Fe/H)
DiskHalo
Homogeneousenrichment
Fe
O,Ne,Mg....,
2.5
[Cr, Mn, Co/Fe]Inhomogenitiy for[Fe/H]<-2.5
Mn
Co Cr
Zn
trend
McWilliam, Ryan, Spite,
[Fe/H] [Fe/H]
C-rich EMP Stars
Aoki et al. (2002)-4 -3 -2 -1 0
[Fe/H]
[C/F
e]
2
1
0
-1
First Generation Stars/Supernovaeand
Extremely Metal-Poor Stars• EMPs: [Fe/H] < -2.5
– Trends in [(Zn, Co, Mn, Cr)/Fe]– C, N-rich Stars
• Variation in C/Mg, Mg/Si, ...– HE0107-5240 (Christlieb et al.)
• Low mass star formation @[Fe/H]~ - 5.3?
• Core-Collapse Supernovae– Black Hole Formation M > 20-25M
Variations in Explosion energy Hypernovae Mixing & Fallback Faint SNe Jets, … Rotation? Binary?
Ia
Ic
Ib
94I
97ef
98bw
HeCaO
SiII
Hyper -novae
Spectra of Supernovae & Hypernovae
Hypernovae: broad features blended lines “ Large mass
at high velocities”
Ic: no H,
no strong He,
no strong Si
SNe Ic SNe IInSN GRB SN GRB
1998bw 980425 1997cy 970514
1997ef 971115 1999E 980910
1999as 1988Z
2002ap 1999eb 991002
2003dh 030329
1997dq
1998ey
1992ar
Hypernova CandidatesEkinetic > (5-10)×1051ergs
SN 1998bw
GRB 980425
56Co decay
Parameters [Mej, E, M(56Ni)]
Si
C+O
He
H-rich
MC+O
FeCollapse
56Ni
56Co
56
Fe
Mms/M MC+O/M
~ 40 13.8
~ 35 11.0
~ 22 5.0
Light Curve Spectra
~ [dyn • diffusion]1/2
~ • RV R c
Mej1/2
½Mej¾E -¼
E Mej3
E Mej
CO Star Models for SNeIc
56 Ni
Spectral Fitting: SN1997ef
Normal SN
E51=1
MCO = 6M
Hypernova
E51=20,
MCO = 11M
Too Narrow Features
Broad Features
Iwamoto et al. 2000
0 50 100 t (days)
98bw&CO138
94I &CO21
97ef&CO100
Radioactive Decay 56Ni 56Co 56Fe
C+O Star Models
98bw 97ef 94I
Mms
(M)
40 35 15
MC+O
(M)
13.8 10.0 2.1
EK
(1051erg)
30 20 1
M(56Ni)(M)
0.5 0.15 0.07
log L (erg/s)
43
42
41
Light curves of Hypernovae & SNeIc
SN 2003dh SN 2003dh GRB/SN ConnectionGRB/SN Connection
SN 2003dh : Early spectra
Hjorth et al (2003)
Kawabata et al. (Subaru)
GRB 030329/SN 2003dh (36d)
IAU Circ. 8133
Similar to SN 1998bw at < ~ 30 days (Stanek et al.; Hjorth et al.)
to SN 1997ef at > ~ 30 days (Kawabata et al.)
Matheson et al.
Mej=8ME=3.8×1052ergs M(56Ni)=0.35M
Bolometric Light Curves
COMDH
SN 1998bw
SN 2003dh
Mazzali et al (2003)
SN 1997efSN 2002ap
SN 1997D:Ⅱ Faint SN Turatto, Mazzali, Young, Nomoto, Iwamoto et al. (1998)
1997D
1987A
1987A
1997D
LBOL
Mms~20M
Mms~ 25 - 30M
R ≤ 300R
M(56Ni)
0.07M
0.002M
m-M=30.64 (NGC1536)
E~4×1050erg narrow lines
Supernovae/HypernovaeNomoto et al. (2003)
Failed SN?
13M~15M
EK
M(56Ni)/M Nomoto et al. (2003)
[/Fe] 0≫
Hydrodynamics
Collimated jets (Z) + Bow shock (All direction)
M Lateral expansion
Radial Velocity/c
R/1010cm
SNe in Binary SystemsSingle M1~M2
”Conservative”M1»M2
”Non-Conservative”
1 2 21
RSG
SNII
Spiral-in
He, C+O Star
SNIb/c
Wolf Rayet (WN, WC)
SNIb/c
Hypernovae?
?
Rapid Rotator
Low energy High energy
(1) M(Complete Si-burning)
(Zn, Co)/Fe
(Mn, Cr)/Fe
Fe/(O, Si)
(2) More ‐rich entropy
Zn/Fe 64Ge
Ti/Fe
(3) More O burns
(Si, S, Ca)/O
Hypernova Nucleosynthesis
Low Energy vs High Energy Explosion
56Ni56Ni
28Si28Si 16O16O
15M, E51=1
25M, E51=30(Hypernova)
Mn
Co Cr
Zn
UN2003
First Supernovae and EMP stars
• EMPs: [Fe/H] < - 2.5– Trends in [(Zn, Co, Mn, Cr)/Fe]– C, N-rich Stars– HE0107-5240 (Christlieb et al.)
• Black-Hole Forming Supernovae
Variations in Explosion Energy Rotation
Mixing & Fallback Binarity
Jets, …
High Energy, Jets
Mixing & Fallback
(~25M - 130M)
Type Ia/IIn SN2002ic
(Kotak et al. 2003)
Discovery of H-lines in SN Ia 2002ic
Hamuy et al(2003)
SN2002ic: ~222d(Subaru)
―― SN2002ic
―― SN1997cy(IIn)
―― SN1999E(IIn)
SN2002ic: Bolometric Light Curve
Circumstellar Interaction Model
• CSM= 0 *(R/R0) –n
H line
• Ejecta SNIa (W7)
• Contact Discontinuity R0=1e+15cm
=0 ~ 1-25e-15g/cm3
ejecta CSM
Reverseshock
Forwardshock
High T~107K
low T~109K
X-ray
Coolingshell
Reemitin Optical
(Chevalier & Fransson)
Result(I)-Light Curve
• Density 0=2.5e-14g/cm3
• Index n=1.8
(Suzuki et al. 2003)
Origin of H-rich CSM
Binary
Single AGB Star
→SN I1/2
Circumstellar Medium of SN2002ic
• Mass ~2-3M
• M ~ 10-4M yr-1
• Aspherical
• Binary Scenario: Massive Companion → WD wind → SN Ia
• Single Star Scenario: AGB Star (Low Metallicity?) → Type I1/2
First Supernovae
[Fe/H] : -5 -4 -3 -2.5 Faint SNe
Hypernovae Normal SNe
Black-Hole Forming Supernovae (20-130M)
⇒ First Black Hole > 2~6M
Faint SNe (High and Low energy) ⇒ C,O-rich ejecta ⇒ Efficient Cooling of ISM ⇒ Formation of Low Mass C,O-rich 2nd Generation Stars