the format of the ijopcm, first submission anal… · web viewbibliometric analysis first author 1...

Bibliometric AnalysisFirst Author1*, Second Author 2, Third Author3

1 Affiliation of the first author2 Tunku Puteri Intan Safinaz School of Accountancy, Universiti Utara Malaysia 06010 UUM Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia

3Affiliation of the third author

*Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Purpose –

Design/methodology/approach –

Findings –

Research limitations/implications –

Originality/value –

Keywords:

1. INTRODUCTION

2. LITERATURE REVIEW

3. METHODS

Fig. 1: PRISMA Flow Diagram

Source: Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 6(7): e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed1000097

4. RESULTS

…

3.1. Document and Source Types

...

Full-text articles assessed for eligibility

(n = )

Studies included in qualitative synthesis

(n = )

Records screened(n = )

Records after duplicates removed(n = )

Records identified through database searching

(n = )

Identification

Eligibility

Included

Screening

Studies included in quantitative synthesis

(meta-analysis)(n = )

Full-text articles excluded, with reasons

(n = )

Records excluded(n = )

Additional records identified through other sources

(n = )

Table 1: Document TypeDocument Type Total Publications (TP) Percentage (%)Article 203 54.86Conference Paper 118 31.89Book Chapter 33 8.92Note 5 1.35Review 4 1.08Editorial 3 0.81Book 2 0.54Short Survey 1 0.27Undefined 1 0.27Total 371 100.00

...

Table 2: Source TypeSource Type Total Publications (TP) Percentage (%)Journals 212 57.30Conference Proceedings 104 28.11Book Series 27 7.30Books 22 5.95Trade Publications 5 1.35Total 370 100.00

3.2. Year of Publications - Evolution of Published Studies

...

Table 3: Year of PublicationsYear TP NCP TC C/P C/CP h g2012 43 11.62 656 164 164 4 42013 27 7.30 1830 261.43 261.43 15 282014 32 8.65 1998 23.79 27.37 19 432015 26 7.03 2961 14.17 17.84 23 502016 19 5.14 2017 8.62 12.77 23 392017 31 8.38 1716 5.88 8.80 20 312018 22 5.95 828 2.26 4.57 13 192019 12 3.24 184 0.55 2.19 5 82020 43 11.62 0 0 0 0 0Total 371

Notes: TP=total number of publications; NCP=number of cited publications; TC=total citations; C/P=average citations per publication; C/CP=average citations per cited publication; h=h-index; and g=g-index.

Fig. 2: Document by Year

3.3. Languages of Documents

…

Table 4: Languages Used for PublicationsLanguage Total Publications (TP)* Percentage (%)English 361 97.30German 4 1.08Portuguese 3 0.81Chinese 1 0.27French 1 0.27Spanish 1 0.27Total 371 100.00

*one document has been prepared in dual languages

3.4. Subject Area

...

Table 5: Subject AreaSubject Area Total Publications (TP) Percentage (%)Business, Management and Accounting 213 30.04Computer Science 183 25.81Economics, Econometrics and Finance 95 13.40Decision Sciences 86 12.13Social Sciences 42 5.92Engineering 38 5.36Mathematics 23 3.24Environmental Science 6 0.85Arts and Humanities 5 0.71Psychology 5 0.71Energy 3 0.42Multidisciplinary 3 0.42Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 0.28Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 0.28Materials Science 2 0.28Chemical Engineering 1 0.14

3.5 Most Active Source Titles

...

Table 6: Most Active Source Title

Source Title TP TC Publisher Cite Score

SJR 2018

SNIP 2018

Journal of Information Systems 19 856 American Accounting Association

N/A N/A N/A

International Journal of Accounting Information Systems

17 34 Elsevier B. V. N/A N/A N/A

New Dimensions of Business Reporting and XBRL

11 69 Springer 2.44 0.9 1.252

International Journal of Digital Accounting Research

10 405 University of Huelva 1.78 0.464 1.099

Ceur Workshop Proceedings 9 1 Sun SITE Central Europe N/A N/A N/AInternational Journal of Disclosure and Governance

8 38 Palgrave Macmillan 1.06 0.283 0.713

Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting

8 332 American Accounting Association

3.53 1.085 1.995

Lecture Notes in Computer Science Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics

8 210 Springer Nature 4.07 1.419 2.354

International Journal of Accounting and Information Management

7 492 Emerald Publishing Limited

7.72 2.323 3.797

Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organization

7 43 Springer Nature 0.97 0.219 0.819

Issues in Accounting Education 6 0 American Accounting Association

0.51 0.221 0.454

Accounting Horizons 5 136 American Accounting Association

0.43 0.155 0.503

Decision Support Systems 5 10 Elsevier B. V. N/A N/A N/AInternational Journal of E Business Research

5 5 IGI Global 0.00 0.102 0.101

Notes: TP=total number of publications; TC=total citations;

3.6 Keywords Analysis

...

Fig. 3: Network visualization map of the author keywords

...

Table 7: Top KeywordsAuthor Keywords Total Publications (TP) Percentage (%)web accessibility 328 8.4accessibility 281 7.2usability 67 1.7wcag 61 1.6disability 48 1.2internet 40 1wcag 2.0 40 1web 40 1e-government 33 0.8evaluation 33 0.8disabilities 30 0.8w3c 30 0.8people with disabilities 24 0.6guidelines 23 0.6wai 22 0.6world wide web 20 0.5universal design 19 0.5assistive technology 18 0.5automated evaluation 18 0.5section 508 18 0.5

3.7 Geographical Distribution of Publications

...

Table 8: Top 20 Countries contributed to the publicationsCountry TP NCP TC C/P C/CP h gUnited States 265 340 7404 15.73 21.79 41 77United Kingdom 127 90 367 1.83 4.08 9 14Spain 125 87 1177 9.27 13.53 20 32Brazil 64 55 1623 21.08 29.51 16 40Portugal 52 39 246 3.84 6.31 7 13

Country TP NCP TC C/P C/CP h gGermany 48 36 209 3.60 5.81 7 12Italy 46 33 520 10.20 15.76 11 22France 39 29 353 7.06 12.17 10 18Japan 34 34 386 8.04 11.35 8 19Australia 33 25 201 4.28 8.04 7 13Norway 27 20 61 1.65 3.05 4 6Greece 26 12 113 3.53 9.42 3 10South Korea 26 19 333 11.10 17.53 8 18Austria 24 13 30 1.07 2.31 3 4China 21 11 47 2.04 4.27 4 6India 21 13 85 4.25 6.54 3 9Turkey 19 16 223 11.15 13.94 9 14Canada 18 14 117 5.85 8.36 6 10Malaysia 18 12 287 16.88 23.92 4 16Ecuador 15 3 7 0.5 2.33 2 2Switzerland 11 6 111 7.93 18.50 4 10Belgium 10 9 31 2.38 3.44 3 5United States 265 5 28 2.33 5.60 3 5United Kingdom 127 6 30 3.00 5.00 4 5Spain 125 6 80 8.00 13.33 4 8Brazil 64 7 186 18.60 26.57 6 10


3.8 Authorship and Co-Authorship Analysis

...

Table 9: Number of Author(s) per Document

Author CountTotal Publications

(TP) Percentage (%)1 206 18.682 296 26.843 284 25.754 175 15.875 67 6.076 42 3.817 9 0.828 7 0.639 1 0.0910 2 0.1811 1 0.0921 1 0.0922 1 0.0926 1 0.090* 10 0.91Total 1103 100.00

*Conference review document. No author is listed.

Table 10: Most Productive AuthorsAuthor’s Name Affiliation Country TP NCP TC C/P C/CP h gAlario-Hoyos, C.

The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong 35 12 270 15.88 22.5 5 16

Meinel, C. Universiti Utara Malaysia 35 12 270 15.88 22.5 5 16

MalaysiaPérez-Sanagustín, M.


Staubitz, T. Universiti Utara Malaysia Malaysia 19 12 270 15.88 22.5 5 16

Dillenbourg, P. The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong 17 12 270 15.88 22.5 5 16

Reich, J. Universiti Utara Malaysia Malaysia 17 12 270 15.88 22.5 5 16

Chen, L. The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong 16 12 270 15.88 22.5 5 16

Khalil, M. Universiti Utara Malaysia Malaysia 16 12 270 15.88 22.5 5 16

Zheng, Q. The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong 16 12 270 15.88 22.5 5 16

Brooks, C. Universiti Utara Malaysia Malaysia 15 12 270 15.88 22.5 5 16

Kalz, M. The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong 15 12 270 15.88 22.5 5 16

Kloos, C.D. Universiti Utara Malaysia Malaysia 15 12 270 15.88 22.5 5 16

Muñoz-Merino, P.J.



Fig. 4: Network visualization map of the co-authorshipUnit of analysis = CountriesCounting method: Fractional countingMinimum number of documents of a country = 3Minimum number of citations of a country = 5

Fig. 5: Network visualization map of the co-authorshipUnit of analysis = CountriesCounting method: Full countingMinimum number of documents of a country = 3Minimum number of citations of a country = 5

Fig. 6: Network visualization map of the co-authorshipUnit of analysis = AuthorsCounting method: Fractional countingMinimum number of documents of an author = 3Minimum number of citations of an author = 3

Fig. 7: Network visualization map of the co-authorshipUnit of analysis = AuthorsCounting method: Fractional countingMinimum number of documents of an author = 1Minimum number of citations of an author = 5

3.9 Text Analysis

Fig. 8: VOSviewer visualization of a term co-occurrence network based on title and abstract fields (Binary Counting)

Fig. 9: VOSviewer visualization of a term co-occurrence network based on title and abstract fields (Full Counting)

Fig. 10: VOSviewer visualization of a term co-occurrence network based on title fields (Binary Counting)

3.8 Most Influential Institutions

Table 7 shows the number of authors per documents. A total of 206 (18.68%) documents were single-authored publications while the remaining documents

Table 11: Most influential institutions with minimum of five publicationsAffiliation Country TP NCP TC C/P C/CP h gTechnische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg Taiwan 14 16 229 9.54 14.31 7 15

University of Hawaii at Manoa USA 13 17 318 13.83 18.71 6 17University of Chinese Academy of Sciences China 13 13 246 15.38 19.92 7 15

Old Dominion University Malaysia 12 12 691 49.36 57.58 7 14The University of Adelaide Malaysia 12 8 21 1.62 2.63 3 4Universidad de Huelva Hong Kong 8 9 49 3.77 4.22 5 6University of Arkansas at Little Rock Australia 7 5 13 1.18 2.60 2 3

University of Winnipeg Taiwan 7 6 199 19.9 33.17 5 10Jinan University USA 7 7 441 44.10 63.00 5 10Universidad Carlos III de Madrid China 6 16 229 9.54 14.31 7 15University of Waterloo Malaysia 6 17 318 13.83 18.71 6 17University of Birmingham Malaysia 6 13 246 15.38 19.92 7 15University of International Relations Hong Kong 6 12 691 49.36 57.58 7 14

Rutgers University-Newark Campus Australia 5 8 21 1.62 2.63 3 4

National University of Ireland Galway Taiwan 5 9 49 3.77 4.22 5 6


3.10 Citation Analysis

…

Table 12: Citations MetricsMetrics DataPublication years 1996-2018Citation years 22 (1996-2018)Papers 1103Citations 8600Citations/year 390.91Citations/paper 7.80Citations/author 4127.37Papers/author 512.53h-index 37g-index 63

Table 13: Highly cited articles

No. Authors Title Year Cites Citesper Year

1 S. Lawrence, C.L. Giles

Accessibility of information on the web [X] 1999 917 48.26

2 J. Lazar, A. Dudley-Sponaugle, K.-D. Greenidge

Improving web accessibility: A study of webmaster perceptions [X]

2004 132 9.43

3 H. Petrie, O. Kheir The relationship between accessibility and usability of Websites [X]

2007 112 10.18

4 T. Sullivan, R. Matson Barriers to use: Usability and content accessibility on the Web's most popular sites [X]

2000 110 6.11

5 J. Mankoff, H. Fait, T. Tran

Is your web page accessible? A comparative study of methods for assessing Web page accessibility for the blind [X]

2005 102 7.85

6 P.T. Jaeger Assessing Section 508 compliance on federal e-government Web sites: A multi-method, user-centered evaluation of accessibility for persons with disabilities [X]

2006 93 7.75

7 S. Hackett, B. Parmanto, X. Zeng

Accessibility of internet websites through time [X]

2004 86 6.14

8 C. Power, A.P. Freire, H. Petrie, D. Swallow

Guidelines are only half of the story: Accessibility problems encountered by blind users on the Web [X]

2012 77 12.83

9 K.M. Griffiths, H. Christensen

The quality and accessibility of Australian depression sites on the World Wide Web [X]

2002 73 4.56

10 J. Abascal, M. Arrue, I. Fajardo, N. Garay, J. TomÃ¡s

The use of guidelines to automatically verify web accessibility [X]

2004 72 5.14

11 L. Von Ahn, S. Ginosar, M. Kedia, R. Liu, M. Blum

Improving accessibility of the Web with a computer game [X]

2006 70 5.83

12 H. Ritchie, P. Blanck The promise of the internet for disability: A study of on-line services and web site accessibility at centers for independent living [X]

2003 70 4.67

13 P. Sun, J.B. Unger, P.H. Palmer, P. Gallaher, C.-P. Chou, L. Baezconde-Garbanati, S. Sussman, C.A. Johnson

Internet accessibility and usage among urban adolescents in Southern California: Implications for web-based health research [X]

2005 68 5.23

14 M.G. Friedman, D.N. Bryen

Web accessibility design recommendations for people with cognitive disabilities [X]

2007 64 5.82

15 A. Schmetzke Web accessibility at university libraries and library schools [X]

2001 64 3.76

16 M. Vigo, M. Arrue, G. Brajnik, R. Lomuscio, J. Abascal

Quantitative metrics for measuring web accessibility [X]

2007 60 5.45

17 Y. Shi The accessibility of Chinese local government Web sites: An exploratory study [X]

2007 60 5.45

18 J.T. Richards, V.L. Hanson

Web accessibility: A broader view [X] 2004 59 4.21

19 J. Lazar, P. Beere, K.-D. Greenidge, Y. Nagappa

Web accessibility in the Mid-Atlantic United States: A study of 50 homepages [X]

2003 58 3.87

20 C.A. Adams, G.R. Frost

Accessibility and functionality of the corporate web site: Implications for sustainability reporting [X]

2006 55 4.58

Fig. 11: Network visualization map of the citation by countriesMinimum number of documents of an author = 1Minimum number of citations of an author = 5

Fig. 12: Network visualization map of the citation by documentsMinimum number of citations of a document = 5

Fig. 13: Network visualization map of the citation by documentsMinimum number of citations of a document = 10

5. DISCUSSION

6. CONCLUSION

Summary –

Contribution –

Limitation of the study –

Future research –

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

REFERENCES

Ahmi, A., & Mohamad, R. (2019). Bibliometric Analysis of Global Scientific Literature on Web Accessibility. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 7(6), 250–258.

Ahmi, A., & Mohd Nasir, M. H. (2019). Examining the Trend of the Research on eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): A Bibliometric Review. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 5(2), 1145–1167.