the formation of asteroid satellites in catastrophic impacts: results from numerical simulations

24
Daniel D. Durda, William F. Bottke, and Brian L. Daniel D. Durda, William F. Bottke, and Brian L. Enke Enke (Southwest Research Institute) (Southwest Research Institute) Erik Asphaug Erik Asphaug (University of California Santa Cruz) (University of California Santa Cruz) Derek C. Richardson and Zoe M. Leinhardt Derek C. Richardson and Zoe M. Leinhardt (University of Maryland) (University of Maryland) The Formation of Asteroid Satellites in Catastrophic Impacts: Results from Numerical Simulations

Upload: pakuna

Post on 21-Mar-2016

30 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

The Formation of Asteroid Satellites in Catastrophic Impacts: Results from Numerical Simulations. Daniel D. Durda, William F. Bottke, and Brian L. Enke (Southwest Research Institute) Erik Asphaug (University of California Santa Cruz) Derek C. Richardson and Zoe M. Leinhardt - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Formation of Asteroid Satellites in Catastrophic Impacts: Results from Numerical Simulations

Daniel D. Durda, William F. Bottke, and Brian L. EnkeDaniel D. Durda, William F. Bottke, and Brian L. Enke(Southwest Research Institute)(Southwest Research Institute)

Erik AsphaugErik Asphaug(University of California Santa Cruz)(University of California Santa Cruz)

Derek C. Richardson and Zoe M. LeinhardtDerek C. Richardson and Zoe M. Leinhardt(University of Maryland)(University of Maryland)

The Formation of Asteroid Satellites in Catastrophic Impacts: Results from

Numerical Simulations

Page 2: The Formation of Asteroid Satellites in Catastrophic Impacts: Results from Numerical Simulations

The “Next Generation” of Numerical Models

We are substantially improving upon past models by conducting We are substantially improving upon past models by conducting detailed 3-dimensional smooth-particle hydrodynamics (SPH) models detailed 3-dimensional smooth-particle hydrodynamics (SPH) models of collisions between asteroids, and then following the subsequent of collisions between asteroids, and then following the subsequent dynamics of ejected debris through fast, state-of-the-art dynamics of ejected debris through fast, state-of-the-art NN-body -body simulations. simulations.

Benefits of this scheme:Benefits of this scheme: Rigorous treatment of impact physics, so that accurate fragment size Rigorous treatment of impact physics, so that accurate fragment size

distributions and velocity fields are establisheddistributions and velocity fields are established

Far faster treatment of Far faster treatment of NN-body dynamics with efficient mutual capture and -body dynamics with efficient mutual capture and collision detection capabilitycollision detection capability

Page 3: The Formation of Asteroid Satellites in Catastrophic Impacts: Results from Numerical Simulations

SPH Modeling

3D SPH code (Benz 3D SPH code (Benz and Asphaug 1995)and Asphaug 1995)

Material strength only, Material strength only, no gravityno gravity (the shock (the shock propagation and fragmentation propagation and fragmentation time scales are less than the time scales are less than the gravitational time scale)gravitational time scale)

100,000 particles in 100,000 particles in target; number of target; number of particles in impactor particles in impactor chosen to match chosen to match particle volume particle volume density in target density in target (resolution of ~2 km)(resolution of ~2 km)

Page 4: The Formation of Asteroid Satellites in Catastrophic Impacts: Results from Numerical Simulations

N-body Modeling

Parallel tree code Parallel tree code PKDGRAVPKDGRAV (Leinhardt, (Leinhardt, Richardson, and Richardson, and Quinn 2000)Quinn 2000)

Fast!Fast! Rapid detection and Rapid detection and

accurate treatment of accurate treatment of low-speed collisions low-speed collisions between fragmentsbetween fragments

Supports arbitrary Supports arbitrary particle size particle size distributionsdistributions

Page 5: The Formation of Asteroid Satellites in Catastrophic Impacts: Results from Numerical Simulations

Initial Conditions

100 km in diameter100 km in diameter BasaltBasalt ρρ = 2.7 g cm = 2.7 g cm-3-3

Target Information:Target Information:

Page 6: The Formation of Asteroid Satellites in Catastrophic Impacts: Results from Numerical Simulations

Initial Conditions

We have completed We have completed 160 simulations over a 160 simulations over a range of parameters:range of parameters: VV = 2.5-7 km s = 2.5-7 km s-1-1

θθ = 15-75 = 15-75 DDimpimp = 10-46 km = 10-46 km

We track the ejecta for We track the ejecta for 4 days of simulation 4 days of simulation timetime

Page 7: The Formation of Asteroid Satellites in Catastrophic Impacts: Results from Numerical Simulations

Types of Asteroid Satellites

Page 8: The Formation of Asteroid Satellites in Catastrophic Impacts: Results from Numerical Simulations

Types of Asteroid Satellites

Page 9: The Formation of Asteroid Satellites in Catastrophic Impacts: Results from Numerical Simulations

Types of Asteroid Satellites

Page 10: The Formation of Asteroid Satellites in Catastrophic Impacts: Results from Numerical Simulations

Types of Asteroid Satellites

Page 11: The Formation of Asteroid Satellites in Catastrophic Impacts: Results from Numerical Simulations

Key to Results

Page 12: The Formation of Asteroid Satellites in Catastrophic Impacts: Results from Numerical Simulations

Key to Results

Page 13: The Formation of Asteroid Satellites in Catastrophic Impacts: Results from Numerical Simulations

SMATS Results

Page 14: The Formation of Asteroid Satellites in Catastrophic Impacts: Results from Numerical Simulations

SMATS Results

Page 15: The Formation of Asteroid Satellites in Catastrophic Impacts: Results from Numerical Simulations

SMATS Results

Page 16: The Formation of Asteroid Satellites in Catastrophic Impacts: Results from Numerical Simulations

EEB Results

Page 17: The Formation of Asteroid Satellites in Catastrophic Impacts: Results from Numerical Simulations

EEB Results

Page 18: The Formation of Asteroid Satellites in Catastrophic Impacts: Results from Numerical Simulations

EEB Results

Page 19: The Formation of Asteroid Satellites in Catastrophic Impacts: Results from Numerical Simulations

EEB Results

Page 20: The Formation of Asteroid Satellites in Catastrophic Impacts: Results from Numerical Simulations

EEB Results

Page 21: The Formation of Asteroid Satellites in Catastrophic Impacts: Results from Numerical Simulations

EEB Results

Page 22: The Formation of Asteroid Satellites in Catastrophic Impacts: Results from Numerical Simulations

Summary of Results to Date…

We are able to produce a large number of satellite We are able to produce a large number of satellite systems consistent with the systems observed to date systems consistent with the systems observed to date through catastrophic and sub-catastrophic impacts.through catastrophic and sub-catastrophic impacts.

The large primaries of SMATS systems (like 762 The large primaries of SMATS systems (like 762 Pulkova) are likely gravitationally reaccumulated rubble Pulkova) are likely gravitationally reaccumulated rubble piles resulting from catastrophic impacts. There are piles resulting from catastrophic impacts. There are likely a lot of undiscovered Ida-Dactyl like systems.likely a lot of undiscovered Ida-Dactyl like systems.

Big, slow impactors striking at 30Big, slow impactors striking at 30 produce a large produce a large number of EEBs (small, loosely-bound systems like number of EEBs (small, loosely-bound systems like 3749 Balam). A lot more of these types of systems 3749 Balam). A lot more of these types of systems remain to be found among the small main-belt asteroid remain to be found among the small main-belt asteroid population.population.

Page 23: The Formation of Asteroid Satellites in Catastrophic Impacts: Results from Numerical Simulations

The modeling continues…

Page 24: The Formation of Asteroid Satellites in Catastrophic Impacts: Results from Numerical Simulations