the four horsemen of ethics andrea, annica, brent and suhba april 2006
TRANSCRIPT
The Four Horsemen of The Four Horsemen of EthicsEthics
Andrea, Annica, Brent and Andrea, Annica, Brent and SuhbaSuhba
April 2006April 2006
AimsAims
• Familiarity with 4 different ethical Familiarity with 4 different ethical modelsmodels
• Practice through examplesPractice through examples
• Draw together with conclusionsDraw together with conclusions
Why Ethics ?Why Ethics ?
• Exam preparation – oralExam preparation – oral
• Life experiences and dilemmasLife experiences and dilemmas
Four Ethical ModelsFour Ethical Models
• The Four PrinciplesThe Four Principles – – Beauchamp and ChildressBeauchamp and Childress
AutonomyAutonomy
BeneficenceBeneficence
Non maleficenceNon maleficence
JusticeJustice
The Jonsen FrameworkThe Jonsen Framework
• Indications for medical interventionIndications for medical intervention
• Preferences of patientPreferences of patient
• Quality of lifeQuality of life
• Contextual featuresContextual features
Modified version of Modified version of Pelligrino MethodPelligrino Method
• Relevant clinical and other factsRelevant clinical and other facts
• Appropriate decision making processAppropriate decision making process
• Available optionsAvailable options
• Features of each optionFeatures of each option
• Law issuesLaw issues
• Moral arguments Moral arguments
• Counter-argumentsCounter-arguments
• DecisionDecision
Schneider and SnellSchneider and Snell
• My core beliefsMy core beliefs
• How have I acted in the pastHow have I acted in the past
• Opinions of othersOpinions of others
• Experience of othersExperience of others
Small Group WorkSmall Group Work