the fourth amendment and students’ rights in public schools
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: The Fourth Amendment and Students’ Rights in Public Schools](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022072011/56649e1b5503460f94b09976/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Fourth Amendment and Students’ Rights in Public
Schools
![Page 2: The Fourth Amendment and Students’ Rights in Public Schools](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022072011/56649e1b5503460f94b09976/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The Fourth Amendment Guarantees that . . .
“The right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
![Page 3: The Fourth Amendment and Students’ Rights in Public Schools](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022072011/56649e1b5503460f94b09976/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
New Jersey v. T.L.O.
The Court balanced students’ rights to privacy against school officials’ responsibilities to maintain order & discipline.
![Page 4: The Fourth Amendment and Students’ Rights in Public Schools](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022072011/56649e1b5503460f94b09976/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
The T.L.O. Test for Reasonableness
• The search must be justified at its inception.• The search must be reasonable in scope, i.e.,“the
measures adopted are reasonably related to the objectives of the search and are not excessively intrusive in light of the age and sex of the student and the nature of the infraction.”
![Page 5: The Fourth Amendment and Students’ Rights in Public Schools](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022072011/56649e1b5503460f94b09976/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Issues T.L.O. Did Not Address
• Less Intrusive Searches (Lockers, Desks)
• More Intrusive Searches (Strip Searching)
• Need for Individualized Suspicion
• Police Involvement in School Searches
• The Exclusionary Rule
![Page 6: The Fourth Amendment and Students’ Rights in Public Schools](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022072011/56649e1b5503460f94b09976/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Less Intrusive Searches than T.L.O.
• Locker Searches
• Desk Searches
• Automobile Searches
![Page 7: The Fourth Amendment and Students’ Rights in Public Schools](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022072011/56649e1b5503460f94b09976/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
States with Legislation Prohibiting Strip Searches in
Public Schools
• California• Iowa• New Jersey• Oklahoma
• South Carolina• Washington• Wisconsin
![Page 8: The Fourth Amendment and Students’ Rights in Public Schools](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022072011/56649e1b5503460f94b09976/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Vernonia v. Acton
The Court balanced the intrusiveness of the search against the promotion of legitimate government interests.
![Page 9: The Fourth Amendment and Students’ Rights in Public Schools](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022072011/56649e1b5503460f94b09976/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
The Vernonia Test
• Need
• Expectation of Privacy
• Obtrusiveness of the Search
![Page 10: The Fourth Amendment and Students’ Rights in Public Schools](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022072011/56649e1b5503460f94b09976/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Issues Left Unresolved by Vernonia
• Legality of random drug testing for students involved in extracurricular activities.
• Legality of random drug testing for all students.
• Need for individualized suspicion in searches other than random drug testing of student athletes.
![Page 11: The Fourth Amendment and Students’ Rights in Public Schools](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022072011/56649e1b5503460f94b09976/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Drug Testing before Vernonia
• Anable v. Ford (1985) (Ark. fed. ct.)
• Odenheim (1985) (New Jersey Super.)
![Page 12: The Fourth Amendment and Students’ Rights in Public Schools](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022072011/56649e1b5503460f94b09976/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Drug Testing after Vernonia
• Todd v. Rush (1998) 7th Cir. Ex-C .Legal
• Trinidad (1998) (Colo.) Ex-C Illegal
• Miller v. Wilkes (1999) 8th Cir. Ex-C Leg.
• Willis (1998) (7th Cir.) All students suspended. Illegal