the fusion model: its roots in british and american tcs rex haigh and jan lees association of...
TRANSCRIPT
The Fusion Model:Its roots in British and American TCs
Rex Haigh and Jan Lees Association of Therapeutic Communities, London
Joint Project Leads, Community of Communities, Royal College of Psychiatrists Research Unit
EFTC Ljubljana, 6 June 2007
Definition: British Model TC
“a consciously designed social environment and programme within a residential or day unit in which the social an group process is harnessed with therapeutic intent. In the therapeutic community the community is the primary therapeutic instrument”
(Roberts 1997, 4)
The Earliest Origins
• 1250: Geel, Flanders - Shrine of St Dymphna
• 1796: Tuke - The Retreat, York
• 1800s: Pinel - Salpêtrière, Paris
• 1817: Pennsylvanian Quakers
• 1862: The Kolonie
• 1920s: Holland - Beilen; Norway -Lier Valley
• 1925: Rudolph Steiner d. - anthroposophy
• 1939: Konig & Camphill Trust - spread over UK
• 1964: Jean Vanier: L’Arche - USA, UK, DK, India
Therapeutic Education
• 1907-1912: Homer Lane - The Boys’ Republic
• 1913-1918: Homer Lane - The Little Commonwealth
• 1924: A S Neill and Summerhill• 1930s: George Lyward and Finchden
Manor• 1934-36: David Wills & Marjorie
Franklin - Q-camps & Hawkspur
• 1970s & 80s Peper Harow & Melvyn Rose
• 1990s Charterhouse Group
Early Origins – learning disability
• 1250: Geel, Flanders - Shrine of St Dymphna
• 1796: Tuke - The Retreat, York
• 1800s: Pinel - Salpêtrière, Paris
• 1862: The Kolonie
• 1920s: Holland - Beilen; Norway -Lier Valley
• 1925: Rudolph Steiner d. - anthroposophy
• 1939: Konig & Camphill Trust - spread over UK
• 1964: Jean Vanier: L’Arche - USA, UK, DK, India
Antipsychiatry
• 1960: Ronnie Laing & David Cooper - Villa 21, Shenley
• 1965-70: Kingsley Hall
• late 1960s - present: Philadelphia Association and Archway Communities
• 1975 - present: Joe Berke - Arbours Association
Social Psychiatry
• 1942: Bion & Rickman - Northfield I• 1942-46: Foulkes, Bridger, Main - Northfield II• 1943: Maxwell Jones - Mill Hill
• 1950s & 60s: David Clark & social psychiatry: a TC in every major hospital; open doors; progressive regimes
• 1972: Institute of Group Analysis founded
• 1998: Reed Report - Henderson replicants approved
• 1999: Systematic review & multicentre research• 2003: “Personality Disorder: No Longer a
Diagnosis of Exclusion”
Therapeutic Housing
• 1959: Elly Jansen - Richmond Fellowship
• 1979: EBC Oxford
• 1984: 45 UK communities, plus overseas
• 1990s: Community Housing and Therapy (SW London), Threshold (Belfast)
“Forgiving Justice”: TCs in prisons
• 1962: HMP Grendon Underwood• 1973-1995: Barlinnie Special Unit,
Scotland• 1975-2002: Max Glatt Centre, HMP
Wormwood Scrubs• 1993: Gartree TC, HMP Gartree• 2000: DSPD proposals• 2001: HMP Dovegate• 2003: Correctional Services Accreditation
Panel -TC Model• 2003: HMP Send (for women) & HMP
Blundesdon
The UK Personality Disorder Programme
• 11 new pilot projects• 2004-2007 • 5 new day-TCs in total• >10 new mini-TCs• Also other approaches:
– 2 ‘managed networks’– 2 DBT-based – Also psychodynamic, CAT, CBT– one early intervention with
adolescents
Rapoport’s “themes”
• Democratisationevery member of the community (all patients & staff) should share equally in the exercise of power in decision making about community affairs
• Permissivenessall members should tolerate from one another a wide degree of behaviour that might be distressing or seem deviant by ordinary standards
• Communalismthere should be tight-knit, intimate sets of relationships, with sharing of amenities (dining room, etc), use of first names and free communication
• Reality confrontationpatients should be continuously presented with interpretations of their behaviour as it is seen by others, in order to counteract their tendency to distort, deny or withdraw from their difficulties in getting on with others.
Developmental experience
• Attachment - belonging– Bowlby, M Main, Trevarthen, Stern, Holmes, AAI work
• Containment - safety– Winnicott, Bion, Meltzer, Bollas, some Kleinians
• Communication - openness– T Main, Whiteley, much dynamic theory
• Inclusion – place amongst others– Elias, Foulkes, Systems, Jones
• Agency – personal effectiveness– Stack-Sullivan, Jung, HIPs
Addiction TCs
• 1958: Chuck Dederich - Synanon, California
• 1960s: Concept Houses
• 1968: Phoenix House, London
• 1975: Synanon declares itself a religion
• 1980 - 90s: development of “hierarchical”, “programmatic”, “concept” or “behavioural” TCs
• 1980s onwards: George deLeon: robust outcome research (USA)
• 2000s: growth across the world of different “flavours” of TC
Key Ideas: Addiction TCs
• ‘the game’ or ‘the stew’
• ‘the roller coaster’
• ‘the onion’• ‘the
community wheel’
• ‘lifestylers’ and ‘squares’
• ‘acting ‘as if’’
• ‘community as method’
• Safety in acceptance
• Verbal reprimands
• Encounter groups
• Family work
•Drug abstinence• Self-help•Hierarchical structure•Social confidence training •Relating
“a concept TC is a drug free environment in which people with addictive (and other) problems live together in an organised and structured way in order to promote change and make possible a drug free life in the outside society”
(Broekaert 2006)
Definition: Addiction TC
Definition: British Model TC
“a consciously designed social environment and programme within a residential or day unit in which the social an group process is harnessed with therapeutic intent. In the therapeutic community the community is the primary therapeutic instrument”
(Roberts 1997, 4)
All TCs: first attempt at a definition
A TC is a consciously designed drug free social environment in which people with various emotional problems live together in an organised and structured way. The social and group processes of the community are the method itself, and through them, change and recovery are promoted. In this way, a new life in outside society is made possible”
All TCs: what is still different?
1. Entry criteria & process2. Range of client groups3. Residential4. ‘Part of the Establishment’5. Global presence
All TCs: what is held in common?
1. Empowerment2. Professionalisatio
n3. Stages of
developmental cycle
4. Progression5. Peer-led6. Various groups &
structures
7. Recovery model8. Survival in a
regulated world9. Need for research &
evidence base10.Funding & short-
termism11.New modifications12.Concepts
Community of Communities: The Annual CycleSixth Year, 2007
Review standards 7 December 2007
Self reviews J une - Oct 2007
TC visits (=peer reviews) September – December 2007
Local report compiled Within 4 weeks of visit
ANNUAL FORUM 23 March 2007
Action planning Until next year’s reviews
TC Journal
Contact Details• JAN [email protected]
• REX [email protected]
• COMMUNITY OF COMMUNITIESwww.communityofcommunities.org.uk
• INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERAPEUTIC COMMUNITIES