the global exchange for social investment jatropha pro-poor investments problems and solutions ifad...

16
The Global Exchange for Social Investment The Global Exchange for Social Investment Jatropha Pro-Poor Investments Problems and Solutions IFAD Consultation on Jatropha Rome, April 10 th , 2008 Dr. Andreas Renner Director Development Investments GEXSI [email protected]

Upload: randall-tyler

Post on 23-Dec-2015

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Global Exchange for Social Investment Jatropha Pro-Poor Investments Problems and Solutions IFAD Consultation on Jatropha Rome, April 10 th, 2008 Dr

The Global Exchange for Social Investment

The Global Exchange for Social Investment

Jatropha Pro-Poor Investments

Problems and Solutions

IFAD Consultation on Jatropha Rome, April 10th, 2008

Dr. Andreas RennerDirector Development InvestmentsGEXSI

[email protected]

Page 2: The Global Exchange for Social Investment Jatropha Pro-Poor Investments Problems and Solutions IFAD Consultation on Jatropha Rome, April 10 th, 2008 Dr

The Global Exchange for Social Investment

The Global Exchange for Social Investment

Our background: Enhancing pro-poor investments

TIME

MARKETCommercial Investments

AID Grant Funding

Deg

ree

of s

elf-r

elia

nce

Civil Voluntary Organizations and Micro-Entrepreneurs often depend on grant funding

Hybrid social organizations require investments

at below-market conditions

Social businesses with solid business model and track record are valid for commercial investments

GEXSIfocus

€10-50k

€50k-500k

€500k-2m

Providing technical expertise in business planning and investment structuring

Locating financing that meets the needs of the enterprise in accordance with its business development stage – arranging for below-market or full-fledged commercial investments

Facilitating networking, mentorship and exchanges of information and expertise

GEXSI assists social entrepreneurs and social purpose businesses in developing countries to move „from aid to market“ by

Page 3: The Global Exchange for Social Investment Jatropha Pro-Poor Investments Problems and Solutions IFAD Consultation on Jatropha Rome, April 10 th, 2008 Dr

The Global Exchange for Social Investment

The Global Exchange for Social Investment

Jatropha Learning Network

Since 2005, GEXSI has started to build up a jatropha learning platform which will be further refined in 2008:

Coaching and Mentoring of local jatropha entrepreneurs in Asia, Africa, and Latin America

Pro-poor investing: Project Development and Implementation of a 300 ha jatropha pilot plantation in Madagascar, designed as a social venture

Research: Facilitation of Exchange of Know-How between Projects

Sustainability: GEXSI is a founding Member of the Multi-Stakeholder Dialogue on Sustainable Jatropha

Madagascar

Tanzania

MozambiqueNetwork + Field Research & Pilots

Learning Network

R&D Partners

Namibia

PeruBrazil

Indonesia

PhilippinesLaos

IndiaGuatemala Gh

ana Cameroon

GermanyNetherlands

Page 4: The Global Exchange for Social Investment Jatropha Pro-Poor Investments Problems and Solutions IFAD Consultation on Jatropha Rome, April 10 th, 2008 Dr

The Global Exchange for Social Investment

The Global Exchange for Social Investment

Global Market Study on Jatropha

GEXSI has been contracted by WWF to undertake a stock-taking on the development of jatropha projects – worldwide.

As of today, we have Identified and processed

data of 288 jatropha projects

Interviewed more than 170 experts in 54 countries

We currently evaluate the data and finalize the report.

We have prepared 40 country profiles and 6 case studies

Page 5: The Global Exchange for Social Investment Jatropha Pro-Poor Investments Problems and Solutions IFAD Consultation on Jatropha Rome, April 10 th, 2008 Dr

The Global Exchange for Social Investment

strong commercial activities(> 5000 ha)

starting commercial activities(100-5000 ha, increasing)

low or no commercial activities(< 100 ha, not increasing)

not researched

Jatropha has been discovered as a future energy crop and will be farmed at large scale

Preliminary Results

Page 6: The Global Exchange for Social Investment Jatropha Pro-Poor Investments Problems and Solutions IFAD Consultation on Jatropha Rome, April 10 th, 2008 Dr

The Global Exchange for Social Investment

Scale of cultivation:2008: 71,215 ha2015: 1,067,028 ha*Expert Country Estimates

Number of projects identified: 96

Total size of projects identified: 89,537ha

Scale of cultivation:2008: 938,999 ha2015: 9,072,093 ha*Expert Country Estimates

Number of projects identified: 91

Total size of projects identified: 1,645,583 ha

Scale of cultivation:2008: 26,866 ha2015: 1,640,250 ha*Expert Country Estimates

Number of projects identified: 41

Total size of projects identified: 20,906 ha

Asia takes the lead in terms of acreage.

Preliminary Results

Page 7: The Global Exchange for Social Investment Jatropha Pro-Poor Investments Problems and Solutions IFAD Consultation on Jatropha Rome, April 10 th, 2008 Dr

The Global Exchange for Social Investment

Preliminary Results

Jatropha cultivation is supported by a growing number of governments

Governmental support for Jatropha cultivation and investments:

strong - through legislation or other means

exists – through other means

currently drafted or discussed

not reported

Jatropha is banned

Page 8: The Global Exchange for Social Investment Jatropha Pro-Poor Investments Problems and Solutions IFAD Consultation on Jatropha Rome, April 10 th, 2008 Dr

The Global Exchange for Social Investment

Assessment

Currently, the financial sector invests billions of USD in Jatropha projects worldwide

This development takes place with or without governments or international organizations taking an active role.

The key question is whether the cultivation models which are chosen, will benefit the rural poor

What organizational and cultivation schemes prevail?

Page 9: The Global Exchange for Social Investment Jatropha Pro-Poor Investments Problems and Solutions IFAD Consultation on Jatropha Rome, April 10 th, 2008 Dr

The Global Exchange for Social Investment

24%

65%

8%

34%

17%Primary Forest

Secondary Forest

Agriculture (food)

Agriculture (non-food)

None / Wasteland

Cultivation affects food production

not at all

very much

1

2

3

4

5

Cultivation mainly on marginal land

not at all

very much

1

2

3

4

5

Cultivation affects primary forest

not at all

very much

1

2

3

4

5

Preliminary Results

Will Jatropha be grown in a sustainable manner?

Food versus Fuel – conflict is not seen as major issue for jatropha Rainforest: Conflicts mainly seen in South-East Asia

Percentage of projects which referred to type of use Global aggregated data of interviews

Project Data Expert Interviews

Sustainability Issues: Food, Rainforest

Page 10: The Global Exchange for Social Investment Jatropha Pro-Poor Investments Problems and Solutions IFAD Consultation on Jatropha Rome, April 10 th, 2008 Dr

The Global Exchange for Social Investment

Preliminary Results

Smallholder outgrowers play an important role

2%

51%

44%

Inclusion of smallholder farmers takes place in most regions and independent from project type and size

Only very few pure outgrower schemes in Latin America

Africa

Project Data (aggregated)

Plantation

Outgrower

Combination

22%

52%

28%34%

39%

36%

Asia Latin America

Page 11: The Global Exchange for Social Investment Jatropha Pro-Poor Investments Problems and Solutions IFAD Consultation on Jatropha Rome, April 10 th, 2008 Dr

The Global Exchange for Social Investment

Critical issue: Smallholders may lose out

Problems

Expert Interviews indicate that there may be a shift towards pure plantation models due to failure of outgrower schemes.

Opportunity costs: What are incentives to participate if there are no harvests in the first 2-3 years?

Loyalty: How to ensure that the participating farmers actually sell to the organization which set up the scheme?

Agronomy: Difficulty to provide efficient pest control etc.

There exist numerous different organizational / institutional approaches; need for further test trials and showcases!

Page 12: The Global Exchange for Social Investment Jatropha Pro-Poor Investments Problems and Solutions IFAD Consultation on Jatropha Rome, April 10 th, 2008 Dr

The Global Exchange for Social Investment

Case Study India – high percentage of smallholders

Expert estimates:

In 5 year‘s time, 38% of the total acreage of jatropha cultivation in India will be small-scale production of <5ha,

compared to only 25% Asia overall

Down-side: Need for continued grant support

Regional Distribution

Tamil NaduAndhra Pradesh

Chhattisgar

Uttaranchal

Haryana

Rajasthan

2008 – 350 ha2012 – 200,000 haGuarantee Price – 0.14 US$

2008 – 328 ha2012 – 20,000 ha

2008 - 15,715 ha2012 - 1,500,000 haAvailable Waste Land - 4,4m haGuarantee Price - 0.14 US$

2008 – 20,277 ha 2012 – 100,000 Available Waste Land – 1,8m haGuarantee Price - 0.12 US$

2008 - 33,000 ha2012 - 220,000 haAvailable Waste Land - 5,6m haGuarantee Price - 0.11 US$

2008 - 84,000 ha2012 – 1,000,000 ha Available Waste Land: 1m haGuarantee Price– 0.13 US$

Most suitable areas

Selected projects

Strong governmental support

Buy-pack policy at guaranteed prices

Grant support schemes

Preliminary Results

Page 13: The Global Exchange for Social Investment Jatropha Pro-Poor Investments Problems and Solutions IFAD Consultation on Jatropha Rome, April 10 th, 2008 Dr

The Global Exchange for Social Investment

Only market based solutions work in the long run

38%

31%

31%

Work with the market player in order to enhance the inclusion of smallholders.Public Private Partnerships as a promising path.

Private

Public

PPPs

17%

19%

64%

Worldwide India

Indicative Figures (double aggregation)

Preliminary Results

Page 14: The Global Exchange for Social Investment Jatropha Pro-Poor Investments Problems and Solutions IFAD Consultation on Jatropha Rome, April 10 th, 2008 Dr

The Global Exchange for Social Investment

Integration of smallholder farmers:

Elements of a strategy

Preliminary Results

Work with (social) businesses who have a long-term interest in further developing the outgrower scheme; allow for growth over time.

Provide Coaching and Mentoring of Farmers (via „techniciens“ etc.)

Involve Microfinance Institutions as partners whereever appropriate

Advanced purchase agreements: Reliability more important than price

Integrate scheme in agronomic calendar of outgrowers

Page 15: The Global Exchange for Social Investment Jatropha Pro-Poor Investments Problems and Solutions IFAD Consultation on Jatropha Rome, April 10 th, 2008 Dr

The Global Exchange for Social Investment

What could IFAD do in order to enhance pro-poor jatropha developments?

1 Promote Field Research: Provide financing to monitor promising approaches of existing projects; make benchmark on outgrower models which work

2 Provide below-market rate of return financing to early stage social jatropha businesses („from aid to market“ approach)

3 Liaise „good projects“ (which meet IFADs standards) with existing development finance schemes and/or provide first-loss guarantees for funds investing in jatropha businesses

Make those projects flourish that have an entrepreneurial spirit, a social vision and a strong management team.

Page 16: The Global Exchange for Social Investment Jatropha Pro-Poor Investments Problems and Solutions IFAD Consultation on Jatropha Rome, April 10 th, 2008 Dr

The Global Exchange for Social Investment

The Global Exchange for Social Investment

JATROPHA PLATFORM

We are in the process of further expanding our jatropha related services

Find our global jatropha study at our new web-site(from 1 May 2008 onwards)

Contact us for further questions:

Andreas [email protected]

www.jatropha-platform.org