the good, the efficient and the open: changing research workflows and the need to move from open...

32
(except logo’s) The good, the efficient, and the open changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science Bianca Kramer & Jeroen Bosman , Utrecht University Library Geneva Workshop on Innovations in Scholarly Communication (OAI9), Geneva, June 18, 2015 @MsPhelps @jeroenbosman

Upload: hierohiero

Post on 07-Aug-2015

170 views

Category:

Science


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The good, the efficient and the open: changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science

(except logo’s)

The good, the efficient, and the open changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science

Bianca Kramer & Jeroen Bosman , Utrecht University LibraryGeneva Workshop on Innovations in Scholarly Communication (OAI9), Geneva, June 18, 2015

@MsPhelps@jeroenbosman

Page 2: The good, the efficient and the open: changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science

analysis

outreach assessmentpublication

writingdiscovery

Page 3: The good, the efficient and the open: changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science

Simple cyclic model of the research workflow

preparation

analysis

writingpublication

outreach

assessment discovery

Page 4: The good, the efficient and the open: changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science

Multi-cyclic model of the research workflow

preparation

analysis

writingpublication

outreach

assessment discovery

Rounds of grant writing and application

Iterations of search and reading

Drafting, receiving comments,rewriting

Submit, peer review, rejection, resubmitting

Rounds of experiments and measurements

Page 5: The good, the efficient and the open: changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science

Multi-cyclic model of the research workflow, with loops

preparation

analysis

writingpublication

outreach

assessment discovery

Rounds of grant writing and application

Iterations of search and reading

Drafting, receiving comments,rewriting

Submit, peer review, rejection, resubmitting

Rounds of experiments and measurements

Page 6: The good, the efficient and the open: changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science

A multi-cyclic, multi-orderedmodel of the research workflow, with loops

preparation

analysis

writingpublication

outreach

assessment discovery

Rounds of grant writing and application

Iterations of search and reading

Drafting, receiving comments,rewriting

Submit, peer review, rejection, resubmitting

Rounds of experiments and measurements

Page 7: The good, the efficient and the open: changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science

A multi-cyclic, multi-orderedmodel of the research workflow, with loops

preparation

analysis

writingpublication

outreach

assessment discovery

Rounds of grant writing and application

Iterations of search and reading

Drafting, receiving comments,rewriting

Submit, peer review, rejection, resubmitting

Rounds of experiments and measurements

Page 8: The good, the efficient and the open: changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science

Three goals for science & scholarship (G-E-O)

• declaring competing interests• replication & reproducibility• meaningful assessment• effective quality checks• credit where it is due• no fraud, plagiarism

• connected tools & platforms• no publ. size restrictions• null result publishing• speed of publication• (web)standards, IDs• semantic discovery• re-useability• versioning

open peer review •open (lab)notes •

plain language •open drafting •

open access •CC-0/BY •

good

efficient open

technical changes & standards

research governance

changes

economic & copyright

changes

researcher

funder

publisher

public

government library

Page 9: The good, the efficient and the open: changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science

good

efficient open

Ongoing discussions

researcher

funder

publisher

public

government library

Page 10: The good, the efficient and the open: changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science
Page 11: The good, the efficient and the open: changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science

2005

2010

Discovery

Analysis

WritingPublication

Out

reac

h

Assessm

ent

Page 12: The good, the efficient and the open: changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science

Changing research workflows

Open Science

Page 13: The good, the efficient and the open: changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science

Survey: scholarly communication tools

Page 14: The good, the efficient and the open: changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science

Survey: scholarly communication tools

Page 15: The good, the efficient and the open: changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science

Survey: 1st 1000 results

What is you research role? What discipline are you working in?

Page 16: The good, the efficient and the open: changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science

Survey: 1st 1000 results

64 countries1 300

Page 17: The good, the efficient and the open: changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science

Breakdown examples

What tools do you use to get access to literature etc.?

Page 18: The good, the efficient and the open: changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science

Breakdown examples

What tools do you use to archive/share data &code ?

Page 19: The good, the efficient and the open: changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science

Tool combinations in workflows

ResearchGate(share pub + researcher

profile)

SPSSLaTeX

1000

0

Page 20: The good, the efficient and the open: changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science

Distribution across Good-Efficient-Open

Good Efficient Open

100%

80%

60%

40%

20%

Page 21: The good, the efficient and the open: changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science

Make these data work for you

?

Page 22: The good, the efficient and the open: changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science

Make these data work for you

Do Asian postdocs look more to impact factors to select a journal to publish in than

their Latin American counterparts?

Page 23: The good, the efficient and the open: changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science

Make these data work for you

Is sharing ‘preprints’ gaining traction beyond the fields of astronomy, physics and math, and

if so, what platforms are used?

Page 24: The good, the efficient and the open: changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science

Make these data work for you

Which tools are used in multiple research phases, and are they leading tools

in any of these phases?

Page 25: The good, the efficient and the open: changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science

Policy applications

Page 26: The good, the efficient and the open: changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science

Policy applications

Page 27: The good, the efficient and the open: changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science

“Focus shifting from ‘journals’ to individual publishable units

(articles, but also other research output)”

Page 28: The good, the efficient and the open: changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science

“Clear(er) shift towards open science / open access, leading to a diminishing importance of traditional journals”

Page 29: The good, the efficient and the open: changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science

Call to action

[Tussenslide (of transitie in slide) over custom URL?]

http://101innovations.wordpress.com

Page 30: The good, the efficient and the open: changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science

Call to action

[Tussenslide (of transitie in slide) over custom URL?]

http://101innovations.wordpress.com

custom URL

Page 31: The good, the efficient and the open: changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science

Call to action

Page 32: The good, the efficient and the open: changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science

Thank you!