the great leveraging (taylor nber & cepr november 2012)
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/29/2019 The Great Leveraging (Taylor NBER & CEPR November 2012)
1/15
The Great Leveraging
Five Facts and Five Lessons for Policymakers
Alan M. Taylor
University of Virginia, NBER & CEPR
International Banking Conference
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and CEPR
1516 November 2012
1
-
7/29/2019 The Great Leveraging (Taylor NBER & CEPR November 2012)
2/15
Fact1.Crises:Almostforgo4en:nowtheyreback
A long standingproblem
For DM and EM Exception: 1940 to
1970 periodunusually quiescent.
Why?
Internal orexternal
constraints?
2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Percentageofeconomie
sinafinancialcrisis
1800 1850 1900 1950 2000
High-income economies Middle- & low-income economies
-
7/29/2019 The Great Leveraging (Taylor NBER & CEPR November 2012)
3/15
Fact2.Consequences:forgotdepressing/deflaonaryimpacts
Evidence-basedmacroeconomics
Event study 14 advanced
countries
140 years of data Recessions are painful
Those withfinancial crises aremore painful
Those with globalfinancial crisesare worse still
Prewar versus Postwar
3
-.
025
-.0
2
-.
015
-.01
-.
005
0
Prewar Recessions Postwar Recessions
NormalCrisis
Global CrisisNormal
Crisis
4 year windows before/after recession peak
Change in real GDP growth rate
-.
04
-.
03
-.0
2
-.0
1
0
Prewar Recessions Postwar Recessions
NormalCrisis
Global CrisisNormal
Crisis
4 year windows before/after recession peak
Change in inflation rate
-.0
8
-.
06
-.
04
-.
02
0
Prewar Recessions Postwar Recessions
NormalCrisis
Global CrisisNormal
Crisis
4 year windows before/after recession peak
Change in real loan growth rate
-
7/29/2019 The Great Leveraging (Taylor NBER & CEPR November 2012)
4/15
Fact3.Extremeleverage:historicallyunprecedented
Then Age of Money
Now Age of Credit
How? More leverage Wholesale
funding
Why? Private actions
(recovery from
GD/WW2)
Governmentpolicies
(financial
liberalizations)
4
0
.5
1
1.
5
2
ratio
1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Bank Loans/GDP Bank Assets/GDP Broad Money/GDP
-
7/29/2019 The Great Leveraging (Taylor NBER & CEPR November 2012)
5/15
Fact3.Extremeleverage:banksversussovereigns
5
.2
.4
.6
.8
1
ratio
1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Bank Loans/GDP Public Debt/GDP
Advanced countries Public debt crisis/
excess?
There is a post2008 blip
Private credit crisis/excess?
Larger andtrending up since
1990
Reversal of ratiosstriking after 1960 Safe assets?
-
7/29/2019 The Great Leveraging (Taylor NBER & CEPR November 2012)
6/15
Fact.Globalasymmetry:EMsbuyinsurance,DMssellit
Post-1990s EMsswitch to safer,
countercyclical
polices and larger
buffers
Great ReserveAccumulation
Unique phase inhistory?
Gold standard Net capital flows
Private inflows Official outflows
No Lucas paradox?
6
-1
000
-500
0
500
1000
U.S.
$
billion
1980 1990 2000 2010
EM Official Flows EM Private Capital F lows
EM Official & Private BOP Account Flows
0
2000
4000
6000
U.S.
$
billions
1999q12001q12003q12005q12007q12009q1
Emerging markets Developed markets
EM & DM NIIP Account Official Reserves Stocks
-
7/29/2019 The Great Leveraging (Taylor NBER & CEPR November 2012)
7/15
Fact5.Savingsglut:shortrunpanicv.longrundemography
Short term reasons to think theera of cheap capital is over
Investment rebound in EMand DM after panic?
Not quite yet! EM reserve step change
completed? DM delevering slow?
Longer term reasons? Demography
Offsetting/postponing factor Recurrent and ongoing
flights to safety in panic
Real rate = 0% in Jun 2012!7
50
60
70
80
90
Dependentsasapercentageofworkingage(2064)
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040
World More developed regions Less developed regions
-
7/29/2019 The Great Leveraging (Taylor NBER & CEPR November 2012)
8/15
Summingupthefacts
An Inconvenient Truth Crises just a fact of life in modern finance capitalism? Exception was 195070 with financial repression, regulation, controls. Period of low credit creation. But it was also still a period of high growth.
Plus A Series of Unfortunate Events
Cheap capital in asymmetric world. Credit boom.
Good = productive projects. Bad = risk of boom-bust cycle. Sequel
Hunger for safe assets, demographic shifts slow (but coming). Low real rates for now= deflationary shock continues, and credible
sovereigns can be funded.
Next What lessons for policy in this kind of financial landscape Macro policy / Financial policy
8
-
7/29/2019 The Great Leveraging (Taylor NBER & CEPR November 2012)
9/15
Lesson1:Pastprivatecreditgrowthdoescontainvaluable
predicveinformaonaboutlikelihoodofacrisis
Schularick and Taylor 2012AER Credit Booms GoneBust
Use lagged credit growthT5,..,T1
Forecast of a financial crisis{0,1} in year T
Ex ante credit boom makesa financial crisis morelikely
Beats null (cointoss) Beats narrow or broad
money
Robust to other controlsincluding macro, interestrates, and stock prices
9
0.0
0
0.2
5
0.5
0
0.7
5
1.
00
T
rue
positive
rate
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00True negative rate
Null, FE only (AUC = 0.640) Credit + FE (AUC = 0.750)
Money + FE (AUC = 0.686) Reference
-
7/29/2019 The Great Leveraging (Taylor NBER & CEPR November 2012)
10/15
Lesson2:Externalimbalances/publicdebtsareadistracon
Jord, Schularick,Taylor 2011 IMF
Economic ReviewFinancial Crises,Credit Booms, andExternal Imbalances:140 Years of Lessons
Couldnt it all be downto external imbalancesrather than internal? Add current account
(%GDP) to the forecastsystem and run a horserace.
As a policymaker, whichsignal has more valuable
information aboutincipient financialfragility?
Not CA/GDP Same result holds for
public debt/GDP
10
0.0
0
0.2
5
0.5
0
0.
75
1.0
0
True
positive
rate
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00True negative rate
Null, FE only (AUC = 0.641) Credit + FE (AUC = 0.750)
CA + FE (AUC = 0.685) Credit + CA + FE (AUC = 0.767)
Reference
0.0
0
0.2
5
0.5
0
0.7
5
1.0
0
True
positive
rate
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00True negative rate
Null, FE only (AUC = 0.638) Credit + FE (AUC = 0.745)
Pub. debt + FE (AUC = 0.645) Credit + pub. debt + FE (AUC = 0.747)
Reference
-
7/29/2019 The Great Leveraging (Taylor NBER & CEPR November 2012)
11/15
Lesson3:AQeracreditboom,expectamorepainful
recession,normalorfinancial-crisis
11
-40
-30
-2
0
-10
0
10
LeveloflogrealGDPpe
rcapitainyear1-5,orthogonalcomponent
-4 -2 0 2 4Excess credit in prior expansion, orthogonal component
coef = -.50628744, se = .17115664, t = -2.96
Normal recessions
-40
-20
0
20
LeveloflogrealGDPpercapitainyear1-5,orthogonalcomponent
-2 0 2 4 6Excess credit in prior expansion, orthogonal component
coef = -.76393738, se = .22300767, t = -3.43
Financial recessions
Credit boom before v lost output afterwards Jord, Schularick, Taylor 2012 When credit bites back Larger credit boom ex ante correlates with deeper recessions in each case
In addition to the larger credit boom making more painful financial crisis case more likely to occur
-
7/29/2019 The Great Leveraging (Taylor NBER & CEPR November 2012)
12/15
Lesson:Inafinancialcrisiswithlargerun-upinprivate
sectorcredit,markdowngrowth/inflaonmore
12
Credit boom before v other outcomes Jord, Schularick, Taylor 2012 When credit bites back Larger credit boom ex ante correlates with deeper recessions in each case
In addition to the larger credit boom making more painful financial crisis case more likely to occur Also depressing for investment and inflation outcomes
Financial
Normal
-10
-5
0
5
10
0 1 2 3 4 5
Real GDP per capita
-30
-20
-10
0
10
0 1 2 3 4 5
Real Investment per capita
0
5
10
15
20
0 1 2 3 4 5
CPI Prices
Cumulative Change From the Start of the Recession
-
7/29/2019 The Great Leveraging (Taylor NBER & CEPR November 2012)
13/15
Lesson5:Inafinancialcrisiswithlargepublicdebt,and
largerun-upinprivatesectorcreditmarkdowngrowth/
inflaonevenmore
JST, work in progress
Zero reference = notreatment
Blue = normal recessionafter +1% extra credit/GDP ppy treatment
Red = financial recessionafter +1% extra credit/GDP ppy treatment
Lt gray = Blue line pathas public debt/GDP varyfrom 0% to 100%
Dk gray = Red line pathpublic debt/GDP varyfrom 0% to 100%
13
Financial: Debt/GDP = 100%
Financial: Debt/GDP = 0%
Normal: Debt/GDP = 0%
Normal: Debt/GDP = 100%
Financial: Debt/GDP = 50%
Normal: Debt/GDP = 50%
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
Percent
1 2 3 4 5 6Years
Financial crisis recession: Debt/GDP = 0100%Normal recession: Debt/GDP = 0100%
Normal recession: Debt/GDP = 50% Financial crisis recession: Debt/GDP = 50%
Real GDP per Capita
Change in growth rate in each year after start of recession
-
7/29/2019 The Great Leveraging (Taylor NBER & CEPR November 2012)
14/15
Summingupthelessons
Pre-crisis prevention
Central bank complacency, with two obvious and key failures Inflation targeting not enough, unable to avert credit boom/bust crisis
Didnt we know this already from history of the gold standard, etc.? Not having well thought out banking supervision/resolution, LOLR regime
Ditto
Both failures present with a vengeance in the Eurozone with amplificationfactors
Post-crisis response What will the path look like?
Worse than people thought/think
Massive deflationary shock; CBs beware of premature tightening ECB rate rise in 2011? Fed/BoE/BoJ responses more accomodative, but large headwinds also
14
-
7/29/2019 The Great Leveraging (Taylor NBER & CEPR November 2012)
15/15
The Great Leveraging
Five Facts and Five Lessons for Policymakers
Alan M. Taylor
University of Virginia, NBER & CEPR
International Banking Conference
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and CEPR
1516 November 2012
15