the i—gaze interweave for aoachment repair in emdr...

1
RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2015 www.PosterPresentations.com Any conclusions from a single case study are speculative at best. Not all cases will yield the same results. The treatment provided had many therapeutic elements, the effects of which cannot be dismantled in this study. Thelma's attachment disorder was relatively mild; others with more severe attachment trauma would not respond as rapidly. I speculate that her childhood spent caring for horses––a social mammal––played a large part in her ability to mentalize and seek comfort in relationship. Thelma may have progressed without any specialized interweaves. Notable is how rapidly she internalized a secure sense of self. It is also remarkable that the I—Gaze interweave has not provoked an erotic transference from any of my clients: male or female, straight or gay, young or old. While a few have remarked that they wish they could take my eye home with them, all have recognized that this intervention is about self- care. None have believed that their relief was coming from or depended on the therapist, or that their therapist was inviting an inappropriate relationship. The I-Gaze interweave described here is designed to intensify non- conscious decoding of the client's non-verbal communication (e.g., eye- gaze, facial expression, prosody), which leads to genuine empathy in the therapist (Schore, 2003) and activates an implicit affect regulatory system in the client (Porges, 2009; Greenberg, 2007). The empathy generated organically by the method's intense right- hemisphere dominated communication constitutes “new,” real-time information to the client. This contradicts the client's “old” information: rejection, dismissal, or contempt––residing in implicit autobiographical memory. Thus, the dual attention aspect of the adaptive information model is conserved. Bilateral stimulation is administered by tapping, the butterfly hug (Artigas, Jarero, Alcalá, & López Cano, 2009) or bilateral tones. When the client actually “sees” and can receive the care and acceptance from the therapist, the mismatch between implicit expectation and actual sensation/ perception creates a prediction error. Prediction error creates a window of memory lability in which the dysfunctionally stored (linked) memory can be updated (Chamberlin, 2015; Ecker, Ticic & Hulley, 2012). Approximately 40% of the general population suffers from an insecure attachment style from infancy. These individuals are disproportionately represented in the psychotherapy population. Seen as a scalar phenomenon, the presentation of insecure attachment can range from an occult co-morbidity of anxiety and depression to disabling personality disorders, intractable relational dysfunction, and self-harm. The associated symptoms of depersonalization, psychic numbing, and affect dysregulation present serious clinical challenges for which specialized interweaves may be necessary. The proposed interweave offers additional dyadic resourcing to facilitate resolution of attachment trauma. The literature on attachment and social engagement in mammals is replete with evidence of the salience of eye-gazing between parents and children, as well as between adults. The I-Gaze protocol involves an interweave in which the therapist sits knee-to-knee with the client and gazes into one of the client's eyes throughout phase four, utilizing bilateral tapping as the dual attention stimulus. It is proposed that this recapitulation the original parent-infant attachment paradigm can enhance dyadic resourcing and install a profound felt-sense of earned secure attachment within the intersubjective realm of the therapeutic relationship. ABSTRACT Setup Procedure (Phase 3): 1. Identify the target Recent: abandonment, rejection, aloneness Past: childhood neglect, abuse with abandonment; “still-face” caregiver Present state: no identifiable memory, but the felt-sense of aloneness 2. Identify the eye with greatest connection to the felt-sense of aloneness Have client cover each eye separately and report affect, sensation, cognition, and SUD Choose eye with greatest SUD* *Unless it is too far outside the window of tolerance 3. Sit Knee to Knee with the client* *or as close as client can tolerate 4. Client thinks about target, focuses on felt-sense, and stares into therapist’s dominant eye Processing procedure (phase 4): 1. Tap on client’s knees alternately* *or have client do butterfly hug as needed 2. Pace client’s breathing 3. Maintain steady gaze & think nurturing, complimentary thoughts 4. Relax your face, let your attachment system do the work 5. Continue procedure for 1 – 2 minutes 6. Break off and both breathe deeply 7. Debrief experience with client 8. Compare client’s report to your own subjective experience 9. Assess progress: if it is going well, continue 10. If the client is not progressing after two sets, do one or more of the following additions while maintaining mutual eye-gaze: a) Read my eye interweave b) Healing light interweave c) Eye-zone differential interweave d) Intervention of the adult self resource A. The Read My Eye Interweave: “As you gaze into my eye, read the message my eye sends you” Two longish sets, as before Be prepared that client may not get a signal, or may misinterpret § I recommend sets of 1 – 2 minutes or more § Do at least two sets of this and assess B. The Healing Light Interweave: “As you gaze into my eye, imagine you see a healing light come from my eye into yours and go into your core…” Longish set, then assess Install any positive felt-sense and try on a PC: I have myself, I’m okay C. The Eye-Zone Differential Interweave: Ask client to rotate his/her head so as to “peer” at therapist’s eye through different zones Ask client to be curious about any perceived differences Use those differences to pendulate, titrate, or install as appropriate D. The Intervention of the adult self interweave Have client imagine adult self comforting child self Reverse roles: child perspective comforted by adult self Install felt-sense + PC “I have myself” METHODS Thelma: Preoccupied Attachment Style “Thelma “was a 43 y.o., once married White female living with her husband and their 10 y.o. son and her husband's 20 y.o. son from a first marriage. Thelma and her husband came into couples therapy to address conflicts surrounding the 20 y.o. It soon became apparent that Thelma's insecurity was at the root of many difficulties. She struggled with holding her husband accountable, or would feel guilt and fear when she did so, requiring reassurance from him afterwards. She felt she was “damaged goods” and that her husband would eventually agree that she is worthless and abandon her. She was jealous of her husband's friendships with other women. She was disgusted at her own body image. She found it difficult to receive care or love and found it hard to believe it was real. History Thelma's parents divorced when she was 5y.o.; she did not know her father who abandoned the family. Her mother, whose own family was replete with stories of sexual and physical abuse, left Thelma home alone from age 12 on for extended periods of time. Thelma described her mother as cold and uncaring; she did not recall being comforted by her. Rather, Thelma found comfort in riding and caring for horses at a neighbor's farm. Thelma was molested by a cousin at age 10; she denied other sexual or physical abuse. Discussion Based on clinical impression, Thelma progressed into earned secure attachment. Her sense of security with her husband improved such that she could set limits with him and tolerate his displeasure, and she felt no need to avoid or pull away from him. She began to see him as an equal with limitations of his own. She no longer worried about her weight and was accepting of her body image. She set limits with her mother and did not tolerate the latter’s criticism or dismissive behavior. Moreover, Thelma began to scrutinize her friendships and started to let go of those who took advantage of her historic over-giving. REFERENCES Artigas, L., Jarero, I., Alcalá, N., & López Cano, T. (2009) The EMDR integrative group treatment protocol (IGTP). In M. Luber (Ed.), EMDR Scripted Protocols: Basics and Special Situation (279–288). New York: Springer. Chamberlin, E. (2015). The network balance model applied to EMDR. Presentation given at the 2015 EMDRIA conference in Philadelphia. Ecker, B., Ticic, R., & Hulley, L. (2012). Unlocking the emotional brain: eliminating symptoms at their roots using memory reconsolidation. New York ; London: Routledge. Greenberg, L. S. (2007). Emotion Coming of Age. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 14: 414–421. Litt, B. (2012). Keeping it in the zone: Assessment and techniques for optimal processing. Presentation at the 8th Western Mass EMDRIA Regional Network Spring Conference, Amherst, MA. Porges, S.W. (2009). The polyvagal theory: New insights into adaptive reactions of the autonomic nervous system. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, 76:S86-90. Schore, A. (2003). Affect regulation and the repair of the self. New York: Norton. Contact me at barrylittmft.com Case Study CONCLUSIONS EMDRIA Approved Consultant Barry LiO, MFT The I—Gaze Interweave for AOachment Repair in EMDR Therapy Mutual gazing between Mother and Infant The I—Gaze Interweave utilizes mutual eye-gaze to activate the attachment system

Upload: doandung

Post on 27-Jul-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2015 www.PosterPresentations.com

(—THIS SIDEBAR DOES NOT PRINT—) DESIGN GUIDE

This PowerPoint 2007 template produces a 36”x48” presentation poster. You can use it to create your research poster and save valuable time placing titles, subtitles, text, and graphics. We provide a series of online tutorials that will guide you through the poster design process and answer your poster production questions. To view our template tutorials, go online to PosterPresentations.com and click on HELP DESK. When you are ready to print your poster, go online to PosterPresentations.com Need assistance? Call us at 1.510.649.3001

QUICK START

Zoom in and out

As you work on your poster zoom in and out to the level that is more comfortable to you. Go to VIEW > ZOOM.

Title, Authors, and Affiliations

Start designing your poster by adding the title, the names of the authors, and the affiliated institutions. You can type or paste text into the provided boxes. The template will automatically adjust the size of your text to fit the title box. You can manually override this feature and change the size of your text. TIP: The font size of your title should be bigger than your name(s) and institution name(s).

Adding Logos / Seals Most often, logos are added on each side of the title. You can insert a logo by dragging and dropping it from your desktop, copy and paste or by going to INSERT > PICTURES. Logos taken from web sites are likely to be low quality when printed. Zoom it at 100% to see what the logo will look like on the final poster and make any necessary adjustments. TIP: See if your school’s logo is available on our free poster templates page.

Photographs / Graphics You can add images by dragging and dropping from your desktop, copy and paste, or by going to INSERT > PICTURES. Resize images proportionally by holding down the SHIFT key and dragging one of the corner handles. For a professional-looking poster, do not distort your images by enlarging them disproportionally.

Image Quality Check Zoom in and look at your images at 100% magnification. If they look good they will print well.

ORIGINAL

DISTORTED

Cornerhandles

Goo

dprin/n

gqu

ality

Badprin/n

gqu

ality

QUICK START (cont.)

How to change the template color theme You can easily change the color theme of your poster by going to the DESIGN menu, click on COLORS, and choose the color theme of your choice. You can also create your own color theme. You can also manually change the color of your background by going to VIEW > SLIDE MASTER. After you finish working on the master be sure to go to VIEW > NORMAL to continue working on your poster.

How to add Text The template comes with a number of pre-formatted placeholders for headers and text blocks. You can add more blocks by copying and pasting the existing ones or by adding a text box from the HOME menu.

Text size

Adjust the size of your text based on how much content you have to present. The default template text offers a good starting point. Follow the conference requirements.

How to add Tables

To add a table from scratch go to the INSERT menu and click on TABLE. A drop-down box will help you select rows and columns.

You can also copy and a paste a table from Word or another PowerPoint document. A pasted table may need to be re-formatted by RIGHT-CLICK > FORMAT SHAPE, TEXT BOX, Margins.

Graphs / Charts You can simply copy and paste charts and graphs from Excel or Word. Some reformatting may be required depending on how the original document has been created.

How to change the column configuration RIGHT-CLICK on the poster background and select LAYOUT to see the column options available for this template. The poster columns can also be customized on the Master. VIEW > MASTER.

How to remove the info bars

If you are working in PowerPoint for Windows and have finished your poster, save as PDF and the bars will not be included. You can also delete them by going to VIEW > MASTER. On the Mac adjust the Page-Setup to match the Page-Setup in PowerPoint before you create a PDF. You can also delete them from the Slide Master.

Save your work Save your template as a PowerPoint document. For printing, save as PowerPoint or “Print-quality” PDF.

Print your poster When you are ready to have your poster printed go online to PosterPresentations.com and click on the “Order Your Poster” button. Choose the poster type the best suits your needs and submit your order. If you submit a PowerPoint document you will be receiving a PDF proof for your approval prior to printing. If your order is placed and paid for before noon, Pacific, Monday through Friday, your order will ship out that same day. Next day, Second day, Third day, and Free Ground services are offered. Go to PosterPresentations.com for more information.

Student discounts are available on our Facebook page. Go to PosterPresentations.com and click on the FB icon. ©2015PosterPresenta/ons.com

2117FourthStreet,[email protected]

Any conclusions from a single case study are speculative at best. Not all cases will yield the same results. The treatment provided had many therapeutic elements, the effects of which cannot be dismantled in this study. Thelma's attachment disorder was relatively mild; others with more severe attachment trauma would not respond as rapidly. I speculate that her childhood spent caring for horses––a social mammal––played a large part in her ability to mentalize and seek comfort in relationship. Thelma may have progressed without any specialized interweaves. Notable is how rapidly she internalized a secure sense of self. It is also remarkable that the I—Gaze interweave has not provoked an erotic transference from any of my clients: male or female, straight or gay, young or old. While a few have remarked that they wish they could take my eye home with them, all have recognized that this intervention is about self-care. None have believed that their relief was coming from or depended on the therapist, or that their therapist was inviting an inappropriate relationship. The I-Gaze interweave described here is designed to intensify non-conscious decoding of the client's non-verbal communication (e.g., eye-gaze, facial expression, prosody), which leads to genuine empathy in the therapist (Schore, 2003) and activates an implicit affect regulatory system in the client (Porges, 2009; Greenberg, 2007). The empathy generated organically by the method's intense right-hemisphere dominated communication constitutes “new,” real-time information to the client. This contradicts the client's “old” information: rejection, dismissal, or contempt––residing in implicit autobiographical memory. Thus, the dual attention aspect of the adaptive information model is conserved. Bilateral stimulation is administered by tapping, the butterfly hug (Artigas, Jarero, Alcalá, & López Cano, 2009) or bilateral tones. When the client actually “sees” and can receive the care and acceptance from the therapist, the mismatch between implicit expectation and actual sensation/perception creates a prediction error. Prediction error creates a window of memory lability in which the dysfunctionally stored (linked) memory can be updated (Chamberlin, 2015; Ecker, Ticic & Hulley, 2012).

Approximately 40% of the general population suffers from an insecure attachment style from infancy. These individuals are disproportionately represented in the psychotherapy population. Seen as a scalar phenomenon, the presentation of insecure attachment can range from an occult co-morbidity of anxiety and depression to disabling personality disorders, intractable relational dysfunction, and self-harm. The associated symptoms of depersonalization, psychic numbing, and affect dysregulation present serious clinical challenges for which specialized interweaves may be necessary. The proposed interweave offers additional dyadic resourcing to facilitate resolution of attachment trauma. The literature on attachment and social engagement in mammals is replete with evidence of the salience of eye-gazing between parents and children, as well as between adults. The I-Gaze protocol involves an interweave in which the therapist sits knee-to-knee with the client and gazes into one of the client's eyes throughout phase four, utilizing bilateral tapping as the dual attention stimulus. It is proposed that this recapitulation the original parent-infant attachment paradigm can enhance dyadic resourcing and install a profound felt-sense of earned secure attachment within the intersubjective realm of the therapeutic relationship.

ABSTRACTSetup Procedure (Phase 3): 1.  Identify the target

•  Recent: abandonment, rejection, aloneness

•  Past: childhood neglect, abuse with abandonment; “still-face” caregiver

•  Present state: no identifiable memory, but the felt-sense of aloneness

2.  Identify the eye with greatest connection to the felt-sense of aloneness

•  Have client cover each eye separately and report affect, sensation, cognition, and SUD

•  Choose eye with greatest SUD*

•  *Unless it is too far outside the window of tolerance

3.  Sit Knee to Knee with the client*

•  *or as close as client can tolerate

4.  Client thinks about target, focuses on felt-sense, and stares into therapist’s dominant eye

Processing procedure (phase 4):

1.  Tap on client’s knees alternately*

*or have client do butterfly hug as needed

2.  Pace client’s breathing

3.  Maintain steady gaze & think nurturing, complimentary thoughts

4.  Relax your face, let your attachment system do the work

5.  Continue procedure for 1 – 2 minutes

6.  Break off and both breathe deeply

7.  Debrief experience with client

8.  Compare client’s report to your own subjective experience

9.  Assess progress: if it is going well, continue

10.  If the client is not progressing after two sets, do one or more of the following additions while maintaining mutual eye-gaze:

a)  Read my eye interweave

b)  Healing light interweave

c)  Eye-zone differential interweave

d)  Intervention of the adult self resource

A.  The Read My Eye Interweave:

“As you gaze into my eye, read the message my eye sends you”

•  Two longish sets, as before

•  Be prepared that client may not get a signal, or may misinterpret

§  I recommend sets of 1 – 2 minutes or more

§  Do at least two sets of this and assess

B.  The Healing Light Interweave:

“As you gaze into my eye, imagine you see a healing light come from my eye into yours and go into your core…” •  Longish set, then assess

•  Install any positive felt-sense and try on a PC: I have myself, I’m okay

C.  The Eye-Zone Differential Interweave:

•  Ask client to rotate his/her head so as to “peer” at therapist’s eye through different zones

•  Ask client to be curious about any perceived differences

•  Use those differences to pendulate, titrate, or install as appropriate

D. The Intervention of the adult self interweave

•  Have client imagine adult self comforting child self

•  Reverse roles: child perspective comforted by adult self

•  Install felt-sense + PC “I have myself”

METHODS

Thelma: Preoccupied Attachment Style

“Thelma “was a 43 y.o., once married White female living with her husband and their 10 y.o. son and her husband's 20 y.o. son from a first marriage. Thelma and her husband came into couples therapy to address conflicts surrounding the 20 y.o. It soon became apparent that Thelma's insecurity was at the root of many difficulties. She struggled with holding her husband accountable, or would feel guilt and fear when she did so, requiring reassurance from him afterwards. She felt she was “damaged goods” and that her husband would eventually agree that she is worthless and abandon her. She was jealous of her husband's friendships with other women. She was disgusted at her own body image. She found it difficult to receive care or love and found it hard to believe it was real. History Thelma's parents divorced when she was 5y.o.; she did not know her father who abandoned the family. Her mother, whose own family was replete with stories of sexual and physical abuse, left Thelma home alone from age 12 on for extended periods of time. Thelma described her mother as cold and uncaring; she did not recall being comforted by her. Rather, Thelma found comfort in riding and caring for horses at a neighbor's farm. Thelma was molested by a cousin at age 10; she denied other sexual or physical abuse. Assessment and Treatment Thelma's childhood trauma is one of neglect. She was informally diagnosed with insecure attachment of the preoccupied type, and body dysmorphic disorder (BDD). She was seen for 57 sessions over 33 months, including 12 couples therapy sessions. 12 sessions involved phase four EMDR desensitization; 7 of these utilized the I–Gaze interweave. The therapy is considered successful with the bulk of the attachment work occurring in the first 9 months (22 sessions) of therapy. The remainder of the treatment focused primarily on integrating new learning and behaviors with her husband, child, and peers. She has been free of insecurity symptoms or BDD for 6 months. Notable in this course of treatment were Thelma's responses to EMDR aided with the I–Gaze interweave. Targets focusing on early childhood neglect or abandonment triggered depersonalization, dissociation of affect, and disgust. The use of somatic interweaves (Litt, 2012) kept Thelma grounded, and the I–Gaze interweave facilitated acceptance of herself as worthy of care. She described the experience as feeling a calming, “warm energy.” Thelma accepted positive cognitions of I have myself and I can take care of myself. She became comfortable confronting her husband as needed without seeking his immediate reassurance. She no longer worried about him leaving her or looking at other women. She was more accepting of her body image. Significantly, Thelma cared for her mother as the latter was dying of cancer. Her mother remained dismissive and hostile to the end, yet Thelma did not personalize these interactions and was able to set limits with her mother. She accepted that her mother is someone who could not be pleased, and Thelma felt good about her final act as a loyal daughter. Discussion Based on clinical impression, Thelma progressed into earned secure attachment. Her sense of security with her husband improved such that she could set limits with him and tolerate his displeasure, and she felt no need to avoid or pull away from him. She began to see him as an equal with limitations of his own. She no longer worried about her weight and was accepting of her body image. She set limits with her mother and did not tolerate the latter’s criticism or dismissive behavior. Moreover, Thelma began to scrutinize her friendships and started to let go of those who took advantage of her historic over-giving.

REFERENCES

Artigas, L., Jarero, I., Alcalá, N., & López Cano, T. (2009) The EMDR integrative group treatment protocol (IGTP). In M. Luber (Ed.), EMDR Scripted Protocols: Basics and Special Situation (279–288). New York: Springer.

Chamberlin, E. (2015). The network balance model applied to EMDR. Presentation given at the 2015 EMDRIA conference in Philadelphia.

Ecker, B., Ticic, R., & Hulley, L. (2012). Unlocking the emotional brain: eliminating symptoms at their roots using memory reconsolidation. New York ; London: Routledge.

Greenberg, L. S. (2007). Emotion Coming of Age. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 14: 414–421.

Litt, B. (2012). Keeping it in the zone: Assessment and techniques for optimal processing. Presentation at the 8th Western Mass EMDRIA Regional Network Spring Conference, Amherst, MA.

Porges, S.W. (2009). The polyvagal theory: New insights into adaptive reactions of the autonomic nervous system. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, 76:S86-90.

Schore, A. (2003). Affect regulation and the repair of the self. New York: Norton.

Contact me at barrylittmft.com

CaseStudy CONCLUSIONS

EMDRIAApprovedConsultant

BarryLiO,MFT

TheI—GazeInterweaveforAOachmentRepairinEMDRTherapy

Mutual gazing between Mother and Infant

The I—Gaze Interweave utilizes mutual eye-gaze to activate the attachment system