the influence of brand loyalty, awareness, and …

94
THE INFLUENCE OF BRAND LOYALTY, AWARENESS, AND ASSOCIATION TOWARD CONSUMER BUYING DECISION OF MIZONE (A Case Study of President University) By Felicia ID No. 014201000029 A skripsi presented to the Faculty of Business President University in fulfillment of the requirement for Bachelor Degree in Economics Major of Management February 2014

Upload: others

Post on 20-Jan-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

i

THE INFLUENCE OF BRAND LOYALTY,

AWARENESS, AND ASSOCIATION TOWARD

CONSUMER BUYING DECISION OF MIZONE

(A Case Study of President University)

By

Felicia

ID No. 014201000029

A skripsi presented to the

Faculty of Business President University

in fulfillment of the requirement for

Bachelor Degree in Economics Major of Management

February 2014

i

SKRIPSI ADVISOR

RECOMMENDATION LETTER

This skripsi, entitled “THE INFLUENCE OF BRAND LOYALTY,

AWARENESS, AND ASSOCIATION TOWARD CONSUMER

BUYING DECISION OF MIZONE” prepared and submitted by

Felicia in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of

Bachelor in the Faculty of Business has been reviewed and found to

have satisfied the requirements for a skripsi fit to be examined. I

therefore recommend this skripsi for Oral Defense.

Cikarang, Indonesia, January 23, 2014

Acknowledged by, Recommended by,

Vinsensius Jajat Kristanto, SE., MM., MBA. Purwanto, ST, MM

Head of Management Study Program Skripsi Advisor

ii

DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY

I declare that this skripsi, entitled “THE INFLUENCE OF BRAND

LOYALTY, AWARENESS, AND ASSOCIATION TOWARD

CONSUMER BUYING DECISION OF MIZONE” is, to the best

of my knowledge and belief, an original piece of work that has not

been submitted, either in whole or in part, to another university to

obtain a degree.

Cikarang, Indonesia, January 23, 2014

Felicia

iii

PANEL OF EXAMINERS

APPROVAL SHEET

The Panel of Examiners declare that the Skripsi, entitled “THE

INFLUENCE OF BRAND LOYALTY, AWARENESS, AND

ASSOCIATION TOWARD CONSUMER BUYING DECISION

OF MIZONE” that was submitted by Felicia, majoring in

Management from the Faculty of Business, was assessed and approved

to have passed the Oral Examination on February 10, 2014.

Chair – Panel of Examiners

Dra. Genoveva, MM

Examiner I

T. Manivasugen, M.B.A., D.I.S.M.

Examiner II

Purwanto. ST., MM

iv

ABSTRACT

This study is conducted to find the relationship between brand equity aspects,

especially brand loyalty, brand awareness, and brand association toward consumer

buying decision of Mizone. Mizone is a product that competes in isotonic drink

market. Mizone is a national product originally made in Indonesia. However,

Mizone isn’t the number one isotonic drink in Indonesia, although it is a national

product. Based on the top brand index 2013, Mizone scored 39.5%, number two

after Pocari Sweat. There are lots of competitors from outside the country that

enter isotonic drink market in Indonesia.

Researching based on the brand equity factor of the product indicated which

factor that affects consumer buying behavior. The result shows that brand

association has the biggest effect on Mizone consumer buying decision, which is

0.643, compared to brand loyalty (0.186) and brand awareness (0.171). Therefore,

the researcher suggests that PT. Tirta Investama which produces Mizone, can

improve their branding aspects especially the brand association aspect.

Keywords: brand equity, brand loyalty, brand awareness, brand association,

buying decision

v

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

First and foremost, the researcher would like to express the greatest gratitude to

her Lord Jesus Christ, whose blessings had helped the researcher to complete this

skripsi. Moreover, I would like to thank V. Jajat kristanto, SE. MM., MBA;

Purwanto, ST, MM; and Sonny Sutedjo S.E., M.M as my advisors for they

have provided me with guidance and assistances. Without them, this research

would not reach its completion.

To my parents Nasrul Saleh and Fonnywati Iskandar, and my sister Silvia Saleh

whose support were very valuable for the researcher to keep continue doing the

skripsi.

To my best friends – Andrie Satya, Beatrice Etania Ribkah, Vina Agustiana,

Wilson Sutarlim, Leon Marcello, Fredi, Maria Amanda, Cakra Suganda, and

Andika Nugraha whose endless support helped the researcher to always be in high

spirit to do the skripsi.

Also to my classmates which is Marketing 2010, thank you for the great time that

we’ve shared together. It is a very valuable memory to the researcher.

In the end, researcher realizes that nothing is perfect, so does the skripsi.

Therefore, researcher accepts any suggestion or recommendation, so researcher

has better understanding about the study.

Cikarang, January 23, 2014

Felicia

vi

TABLE OF CONTENT

ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................... iv

ACKNOWLEDGMENT .......................................................................................... v

TABLE OF CONTENT ......................................................................................... vi

LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................. ix

LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................. x

CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................. 1

1.1.Background of Study ...................................................................................... 1

1.2.Problem Identification .................................................................................... 5

1.3.Statement of Problem ..................................................................................... 5

1.4.Research Objective ......................................................................................... 6

1.5.Research Limitation ........................................................................................ 6

1.6. Definition of Terms ....................................................................................... 7

1.7. Significance of the Study ............................................................................... 8

1.8. Benefits of the Study ..................................................................................... 9

CHAPTER II: LITERATURE REVIEW .............................................................. 10

2.1. Theoretical Review ...................................................................................... 10

2.1.1. Marketing .............................................................................................. 10

2.1.2. Brand..................................................................................................... 12

2.1.3. Brand Equity ......................................................................................... 15

2.1.3.1. Brand Loyalty................................................................................ 18

2.1.3.2. Brand Awareness .......................................................................... 21

2.1.3.3. Brand Association ......................................................................... 24

2.1.3.4. Perceived Quality .......................................................................... 26

vii

2.1.3.5. Other Proprietary Asset ................................................................. 28

2.1.4. Consumer Buying Behavior ................................................................. 28

2.2. Previous Research ....................................................................................... 34

2.3. Theoretical Framework ............................................................................... 36

2.4. Hypotheses .................................................................................................. 36

CHAPTER III: METHODOLOGY ....................................................................... 37

3.1. Research Method ......................................................................................... 37

3.2. Research Design .......................................................................................... 38

3.3. Research Instrument .................................................................................... 39

3.3.1. Data Collection ..................................................................................... 39

3.3.2. Data Collection Technique ................................................................... 40

3.3.3. Measurement Scale and Data Analysis................................................. 41

3.3.3.1. Measurement Scale ....................................................................... 41

3.3.3.2. Data Analysis ................................................................................ 42

3.4. Validity and Reliability ............................................................................... 42

3.4.1. Validity Test ......................................................................................... 42

3.4.2. Reliability Test...................................................................................... 43

3.5. Sampling Design ......................................................................................... 44

3.4.1. Sampling Technique ............................................................................. 44

3.5.1. Sampling Size ....................................................................................... 45

3.6. Statistical Tools ........................................................................................... 46

3.6.1. Multiple Regression .............................................................................. 46

3.6.2. Correlation Test .................................................................................... 47

3.6.3. Normality Test ...................................................................................... 47

3.6.4. Multicollinearity Test ........................................................................... 48

3.6.5. Heterokedasticity Test .......................................................................... 48

viii

3.6.6. F Test .................................................................................................... 48

3.6.7. T Test .................................................................................................... 49

3.7. Limitation of the Research .......................................................................... 50

CHAPTER IV: ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION ...................................... 51

4.1. Company Profile .......................................................................................... 51

4.2. Data Analysis ............................................................................................... 53

4.2.1. Respondent Profile................................................................................ 53

4.2.2. Validity Test ......................................................................................... 54

4.2.3. Reliability Test...................................................................................... 55

4.2.4. Correlation Test .................................................................................... 56

4.2.5. Multiple Regression .............................................................................. 56

4.2.6. Normality Test ...................................................................................... 57

4.2.7. Heterokedasticity Test .......................................................................... 58

4.2.8. Multicollinearity Test ........................................................................... 59

4.2.9. F Test .................................................................................................... 59

4.2.10. T Test .................................................................................................. 60

4.2.11. Multiple Regression Model ................................................................ 61

4.3. Interpretation Result .................................................................................... 63

CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION ............................. 65

5.1. Conclusion ................................................................................................... 65

5.2. Recommendation ......................................................................................... 66

REFERENCES ....................................................................................................... 68

APPENDICES ....................................................................................................... 72

APPENDIX I .......................................................................................................... 73

APPENDIX II ........................................................................................................ 76

APPENDIX III ....................................................................................................... 79

ix

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1.1 Top Brand Index ...................................................................................... 3

Table 2.1 Brand Equity Studies ............................................................................. 16

Table 2.2 Brand Equity Past Research ................................................................... 34

Table 3.1 Likert Scale ............................................................................................ 42

Table 3.2 Interpretation Coefficient R ................................................................... 47

Table 4.1 Table Respondent Profile Based On Gender ......................................... 53

Table 4.2 Validity Test Result ............................................................................... 54

Table 4.3 Reliability Test Result ............................................................................ 55

Table 4.4 Correlations ............................................................................................ 56

Table 4.5 Multicollinearity Result ......................................................................... 59

Table 4.6 ANOVA ................................................................................................. 60

Table 4.7 Coefficients ............................................................................................ 60

Table 4.8 Model Summary ..................................................................................... 62

Table 4.9 R Value .................................................................................................. 62

Table 4.10 Significance and Beta Coefficients ...................................................... 63

x

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 2.1 Brand Equity Aspects ........................................................................... 18

Figure 2.2 Brand Loyalty Level Pyramid .............................................................. 19

Figure 2.3 Brand Awareness Level Pyramid ......................................................... 23

Figure 2.4 Factors Influence Consumer Behavior ................................................. 29

Figure 2.5 Maeslow’s Hierarchy of Needs ............................................................ 31

Figure 2.6 Consumer Buying Decision Steps ........................................................ 32

Figure 2.7 Theoretical Framework ......................................................................... 36

Figure 4.1 Mizone .................................................................................................. 52

Figure 4.2 Demographic Views (Gender) .............................................................. 53

Figure 4.3 Histogram ............................................................................................. 57

Figure 4.4 P-P Plot ................................................................................................. 57

Figure 4.5 Scatterplot ............................................................................................. 58

1

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

1.1. Background of Study

Water is unique molecule that exists in nature and it is available in three forms:

solid, liquid, and gas. Humans’ earth is covered with 75% of water. It is a very

important molecule for humans to live in the earth. Human body contains from

55% to 78% of water, depends on the body size. It is a very essential thing for

humans to perform their activities. Without water, humans can’t live or survive.

Water is used to drink, transportation, chemical uses, fire extinction, and perform

daily activities like washing or cleaning. The importance of water is:

1. Maintain people health

2. Keep the bloodstream liquid enough to flow in the blood vessels

3. Eliminate the result of metabolism (for example: urea)

4. Regulate body temperature through sweating

5. Carry the nutrients and oxygen to cells.

Based on British Dietetic Association, people are recommended to drink

minimum 1.8 liters of water everyday (8 glasses of water) to balance the fluid in

their body. People who have low water content in their body can suffer

dehydration. Dehydration occurs when people only drink little water, so the water

content in their body is very low. Other causes are they vomit, increased sweating

because of the hot weather, etc. Some symptoms of dehydration are headaches,

weakness, tiredness, confusion, lethargy, etc. For people who have dehydration,

they have to drink water to increase the amount of fluid in their body. If

dehydration isn’t countered fast, urination can stop, kidney fails, so the body can’t

remove toxic waste. Moreover, in the extreme cases, dehydration can also result

in death. This shows that water is very important for humans to live healthy.

2

Besides for human healthiness, water also plays important part in businesses.

First, water is important for human to live healthy, so they can do their activities

(include working) and perform well in their activities. Second, no water means no

business. Water is a requisite resource for business. Without regular or continuous

access to clean water, businesses either have to raise prices, shut down or both.

Industries that rely on water for operations or manufacturing are the most

vulnerable and most at risk. Throughout the world, water scarcity, water quality,

climate change, rapid industrialization, deforestation, unsustainable agricultural

practices and fast growing populations are putting pressure on companies to

understand how water issues can destabilize, radically alter, or halt business

performance.

Nowadays, people expand their business in more than one industry and many

people build a company in beverage industry. This industry can be classified

again into companies that produce drinking water, packaged water, soda, fruit-

flavored water, and also isotonic water. Moreover, there are many companies in

the world that produce sport water which contain isotonic, such as: Accelerade,

Aquarius, Coconut Water, Gatorade, Lucozade Sport, Pocari Sweat, Powerade,

etc. These sport water become popular in the world and people not only drink

pure water, but also buy and consume sport drinks as well. Sport drinks are

beverages to help active people replace water, electrolytes, and energy in their

body.

In Indonesia itself, there are some companies that produce isotonic drinks, such

as: Pocari Sweat, Mizone, Vitazone, X-ion, Powerade, and Fatigon Hydro. These

isotonic drinks become popular in Indonesia and many people consume them.

They also can buy it in Supermarket because these products are distributed to

many places in Indonesia, so people can buy it easily. Popular companies that

produce isotonic drinks are PT. Aqua Golden Mississippi (produces Mizone), PT.

Amerta Indah Otsuka (produces Pocari Sweat), PT. Mayora Indah (produces

Vitazone), Dankos Laboratories (produces X-ion), PT. Coca Cola Amatil

(produces Powerade), and PT. Kalbe Farma (produces Fatigon Hydro).

3

PT. Aqua Golden Mississippi is built in 1973 by Tirto Utomo and it is a pioneer

of packaged drinking water in Indonesia. In 1998, Aqua (under PT. Tirta

Investama) joined Danone Group. PT. Tirta Investama is the market leader of

packaged drinking water. The company then tried to enter isotonic drink business

by launching Mizone on September 27, 2005. At that time, Mizone competed with

Pocari Sweat and Powerade Isotonik in which both are originally from foreign

company. Mizone is an isotonic drink which contains ion with function to fill

people’s body fluid. After Mizone, there was several local competitors show up

like Vitazone, X-ion, Prosweat, etc.

Mizone is produced under big company which is the producer of pioneered

drinking water, Aqua. However, based on top brand index 2013 in Indonesia, the

top brand index of Mizone is below Pocari Sweat. Top brand index is an indicator

to know how strength the brand is. It is formulated based on 3 variables: mind

share, market share, and commitment share. Mind share indicated a brand’s

strength inside the minds of the consumers of the respective product category.

Market share is a brand’s strength in a certain market in terms of consumers’

actual buying behavior. Commitment share means a brand’s strength in

encouraging consumers to buy that brand in the future. The top brand index for

isotonic drink can be seen in table below:

Table 1.1 Top Brand Index

NO BRAND TBI

1. Pocari Sweat 52.5%

2. Mizone 39.5%

3. Vitazone 2.8%

4. Fatigon Hydro 2.3%

Source: Top Brand Index Survey (2013)

From the table of top brand index that is made by Frontier Consulting Group

above, it shows that isotonic drink market is dominated by Pocari Sweat (under

PT. Amerta Indah Otsuka, subsidiary from Japan) by 52.5%. Then it is followed

4

by Mizone (39.5%), Vitazone (2.8%), and Fatigon Hydro (2.3%). It means that

the brand Pocari Sweat is preferred by more consumers in Indonesia. The brand is

remembered in people’s mind (mind share). Then, people also buy this product

more than they buy Mizone (market share). Moreover, people also satisfied with

the product and buy it again in the future (commitment share).

In the other hand, Mizone is a product that also accepted by Indonesia people. In

order to compete with Pocari Sweat which comes first in Indonesia, PT. Tirta

Investama produces Mizone, an isotonic drink with lower price, higher quantity,

and available in several flavors. These are the strength of Mizone, compared to

Pocari Sweat which is only available in one flavor and higher price. However,

Pocari Sweat is the first well-known isotonic drink in Indonesia, so Mizone has to

improve its product and strengthen the brand in order to become number one in

isotonic drink segment in Indonesia.

Based on previous research done by Shalina (Shalina, 2008), people tend to have

a better image of Pocari Sweat rather than Mizone. The association that Mizone

wants to put in customers’ mind is an isotonic drink to replace body fluid.

However, it is shown that people see Mizone as an isotonic drink with many

flavors and produced by a reputable company.

The researcher chooses this topic because isotonic drink is a product which now

can be easily bought everywhere. Mizone is a popular isotonic drink, yet it isn’t

the winner in the market because of Pocari Sweat. Mizone also has a very good

advertising and marketing campaign. The recent marketing activity of Mizone is

its interactive website (www.mizone.co.id). The website is very creative and show

that Mizone is a right product for people who tired or feeling “K.O” (knocked

down, tired, no energy left). Mizone also has TV ads with similar message which

is drink Mizone to bring back your energy.

Although Mizone product is cheaper than Pocari Sweat, has higher quantity that

Pocari Sweat, and has interesting website and TV ads; Mizone top brand index is

still below Pocari Sweat. This shows that brand is very important and strong

positive brand will give huge benefit to the product. People will buy product that

5

they know, they like, and they enjoy. Therefore, the researcher is interested to do

a research about the influence of brand loyalty, brand awareness, and brand

association toward consumer buying decision of Mizone product in Indonesia.

1.2. Problem Identification

Nowadays, many companies in Indonesia compete with each other to become the

number one company based on the specific category, include isotonic drink

industry. However, competing with other company isn’t an easy task. PT. Tirta

Investama with its Mizone must focus on the product strength to create

competitive advantage that is different from other companies with their isotonic

drink product, in order to gain more customers and keep loyal customers.

Moreover, the company also has to analyze who are its competitors and how to

defeat them, how to make Mizone become number one of isotonic product against

its main competitor which is Pocari Sweat. Based on top-brand index (TBI) result

in 2010, Mizone TBI is 32.4% and Pocari Sweat is 59.4%. In 2011, Mizone TBI is

42.7% while Pocari Sweat TBI is 48.8%. Moreover, in 2013, Mizone TBI (39.5%)

is still below Pocari Sweat (52.5%). Therefore, Mizone must know what customer

think about the brand. By knowing it, Mizone can take decisive and immediate

action to improve the product, brand, and take right steps to defeat its main

competitor, Pocari Sweat, under PT. Amerta Indah Otsuka.

1.3. Statement of Problem

Generally, this research is about finding out what is consumer buying decision of

Mizone product based on their loyalty, awareness, and their association about the

brand. People buy a product because they know and aware about the brand, also

they satisfied with the product. They buy the product because they have their own

perception and association about it. However, there are some people who know

nothing about the brand. They try the product and then they like it. People will

have new perception and association about the brand after they try it. There are

6

many aspects that affect people to buy a specific product. In this research, the

researcher analyzes the brand loyalty, brand awareness, and brand association

aspects that encourage people to make decision and then buy the product.

Researcher has constructed and designed following research questions:

1. Does brand loyalty influence consumer buying decision of Mizone?

2. Does brand awareness influence consumer buying decision of Mizone?

3. Does brand association influence consumer buying decision of Mizone?

4. Does brand loyalty, brand awareness, and brand association influence

consumer buying decision of Mizone?

1.4. Research Objective

The main objective of the research is:

1. To analyze influence between brand loyalty toward consumer buying

decision of Mizone.

2. To analyze influence between brand awareness toward consumer buying

decision of Mizone.

3. To analyze influence between brand association toward consumer buying

decision of Mizone.

4. To analyze influence between brand loyalty, brand awareness, and brand

association toward consumer buying decision of Mizone.

1.5. Research Limitation

Scope of the study is to analyze brand loyalty, brand awareness, and brand

association of Mizone that makes people buy the product (consumer buying

decision). To guide this research, researcher uses quantitative method to analyze

the consumer buying decision of Mizone product. Researcher prefers to use this

study because it is the most well-known study for quantitative research

methodology.

7

A limitation of this study is to college students (age 18-21 years old), who study

in President University in Cikarang, and has consumed Mizone. Because of

limited time and budget, the number of sample that researcher take is 100 people.

This study is also dedicated to students who need to know about brand equity of

FMCG product.

1.6. Definition of Terms

Brand: A sign in the form of image, name, word, letter, figure, colors

arrangement, or combination of these elements that have differentiation and are

used in trading goods or services.

Brand equity: The difference between the value of the brand to the consumer and

the value of the product without that branding.

Brand loyalty: The situation in which a consumer generally buys the same

manufacturer-originated product or service repeatedly over time rather than

buying from multiple suppliers within the category.

Brand awareness: The ability for customers to remember a particular brand or

advertising spontaneously or after they are stimulated with key words related to

the brand.

Brand association: Everything that is related to memory about a brand, attribute

that is available in that brand itself.

Customer: Customer is the recipient of a good, service, product, or idea, obtained

from a seller, vendor, or supplier for a monetary or other valuable consideration

(Kendall, 2007).

Consumer buying decision: Steps that consumers go through before they buy a

product or service and their behavior after they buy the product or service.

Isotonic: Isotonic has equal water to the cell, so both the cell and solution have

the same water concentration all the time.

8

1.7. Significance of the Study

This study is important because brand is one of the most important assets of a

company. A brand itself can worth dozens of company’s book value. Brand is an

interface between the company and its customers, a description of product or

service that the company offers. If people don’t know about your brand, it means

that the company is in danger because there will be only few people who

recognize or aware about the brand and buy the product or service it offers. If

people have a negative perception and association about a specific brand, the

brand also in danger because people won’t buy the product because of the

negative effect it causes in the mind of customers, yet they won’t become loyal

customers to the company. Therefore, by analyzing the brand performance, the

company can evaluate and determine smart planning and strategy to develop the

product, so the product’s brand will be recognized by people and they also keep

buy the product because they trust the brand.

This study is important for academic teachers/lecturers because this research will

show the importance of brand of a product to the company who produces it. By

understanding this, the lecturers can teach their student that branding is a

common, yet very important thing of marketing aspect in a company about the

product or service that the company offers to the customers. Moreover, lecturers

can also teach their students real example of a successful brand that focus on

analyzing its brand aspect and gain many customers because of the positive image

and perception of the brand.

This study is also important for student because they can learn a lot about

branding. By learning about brand loyalty, brand awareness, and brand

association of a product, they can understand that brand is a very important aspect

that they must consider in a product. They can also learn how people buy the

product because of the brand, what decision that it takes for people to finally buy

and consume the product. Brand worth million dollar in a business. Brand itself

can make people to buy and consume the product or to not use the product. Strong

9

brand is a very good asset for the company and a step to gain many customers to

buy the product.

A product has its own brand in which the brand loyalty, brand awareness, and

brand association analysis will be different from one product to other products.

Generally, by knowing the brand loyalty, brand awareness, and brand association

of Mizone, researcher can analyze what is the influence of these aspects to buying

decision of people who consume it. Thus, researcher makes a research that

involves people who consume Mizone product. This study hopefully will be

useful for future President University students in order to gain knowledge about

brand equity and as for researcher, understanding the branding concept especially

brand loyalty, brand awareness, and brand association will help her to increase her

knowledge in the field of marketing.

1.8. Benefits of the Study

The benefit of the study is to increase the analytical thinking of the researcher.

This research is also beneficial for readers because they can learn a lot from this

research. They can study about what is the meaning of brand loyalty, brand

awareness, and brand association and how to analyze a product based on its brand.

Moreover, they can also read the result of this research and take a conclusion

about this study.

10

CHAPTER II

LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1. Theoretical Review

2.1.1. Marketing

There are many successful companies compete with each other to become the

best. In order to success, those companies heavily focus on one same thing, which

is marketing. Marketing is a front action to gain customers. To be profitable

companies, they must make people purchase their product or service, become

their customers. The heart of business success lies in its marketing. Without

marketing, companies can offer their best product or service, but no potential

customers will know, realize, or buy what the companies produce. Therefore,

marketing is very important and all businesses or companies need to do marketing

activities.

Some experts have their own definition of marketing. These are several definition

of marketing based on them:

According to Dr. Philip Kotler (2012):

“Marketing is the science and art of exploring, creating, and delivering

value to satisfy the needs of a target market at a profit. Marketing identifies

unfulfilled needs and desires. It defines, measures, and quantifies the size of the

identified market and the profit potential. It pinpoints which segments the

company is capable of serving best and it designs and promotes the appropriate

products and services”.

According to Keller (2012):

“Marketing is about identifying and meeting human and social needs, one

of the shortest good definitions of marketing is meeting needs profitably”.

11

According to the American Marketing Association (July 2013):

“Marketing is the activity, set of institutions, and processes for creating,

communicating, delivering, and exchanging offerings that have value for

customers, clients, partners, and society at large”.

According to the Chartered Institute of Marketing (2009):

“Marketing is the management process responsible for identifying,

anticipating and satisfying customer requirements profitably. In essence, the

marketing function is the study of market forces and factors and the development

of a company’s position to optimize its benefit from them.”

Based on these definitions above, the researcher can conclude that marketing is an

activity of delivering value to customers by fulfilling their needs or wants and

satisfy customers. By doing that, the company can get another value in exchange,

which is profit. People decide to buy a product or service because they realize that

they need it or they want it, and it creates a demand. Kotler & Armstrong (2012)

defines them as: “Needs is states of felt deprivation which includes basic physical

needs for food, clothing, warmth, and safety; social needs for belonging and

affection; and individual needs for knowledge and self-expression. In the other

hand, wants are the form of human needs take as they are shaped by culture and

individual personality. Wants also shaped by one’s society and are described in

terms of objects that will satisfy needs. Moreover, demands is wants for specific

products that are backed by an ability and willingness to buy them. Wants become

demand when supported by purchasing power.”

Generally, marketing is a heart of a business. Marketing is an activity with aim to

fulfill customers’ needs and wants, thus create demand for a company and the

company gain profit by serving them. By understanding customers’ needs and

wants, a company can serve them by giving value to customers, create good

relationship with customers in whom it is very beneficial for the company, and

satisfy them. In the end, the company will get profit from customers and it is the

value for the company.

12

2.1.2. Brand

High competition in market today makes people as customers are overwhelmed

with so many brands that are offered to them. As of example, if people want to

buy soft drink, there are many choices of soft drink brand: Coca-cola, Pepsi,

Fanta, Sprite, Mirinda, F&N, etc. With so many choices of brand when customers

want to buy a specific product, many of them will choose the most familiar brand

or the brand which has positive contribute for them. This shows that branding is

very important. Although branding doesn’t directly contribute to profit (unlike

sales), branding is very important to maintain the company for long term period.

According to the American Marketing Association, a brand is a “name, term, sign,

symbol, or design, or a combination of them intended to identify the goods and

services of one seller or group of sellers and to differentiate them from those of

competition.” The key to creating a brand is to choose product attributes that

identify the product and differentiate it from other products. Brand elements are

different components of a brand which identify and differentiate it. Brand

elements include: logo, symbol, name, design of the package, and other attributes

related to the brand (Kotler et al., 2009).

Based on Indonesian regulation (UU Merek No.15 Pasal 1 Ayat 1), a brand is a

sign in the form of image, name, word, letter, figure, colors arrangement, or

combination of these elements that have differentiation and are used in trading

goods or services.

“Merek adalah tanda yang berupa gambar, nama, kata, huruf-huruf, angka-

angka, susunan warna, atau kombinasi dari unsur-unsur tersebut yang memiliki

daya pembeda dan digunakan dalam kegiatan perdagangan barang atau jasa.”

(Soekarnoputri, 2001).

Based on Freddy Rangkuti (2004), good characteristics in a brand are:

1. A brand name must indicate the benefit and quality of the product.

2. A brand name must be easy to say, recognize, and remember.

3. A brand name must be specific, so it’s easy to differentiate.

13

4. A brand name must be registered legally.

A brand is a complex symbol and it can convey up to 6 levels of meanings (Kotler

et al., 2011), such as:

1. Attributes:

A brand obviously brings number of attributes into a mind. For example:

in automotive industry, Mercedes Benz brings to mind attributes like

expensive, well-built, high prestige, durable, and fast. Thus, the marketer

can advertise the car by using one or more of these attributes. This is the

base for the company to position itself and to project another attribute.

2. Benefits:

People don’t buy attributes, they buy benefits. Based on Hyman, Kopf,

and Lee (2010), marketers often translate product attributes into buying

benefits. Attributes are translated into functional and emotional benefits.

For example: one of Mercedes Benz attributes is high prestige. This

attribute may translate into emotional benefit “the car helps me to feel very

admired and important.”

3. Values:

A brand convey to marketers or producer’s values , hence in the entire

marketing process, the view of the brand serves as instrument for

attracting buyers that identify with marketers’ values. For example: the

brand Mercedes Benz can be viewed as fast, high performance, and

prestige. Therefore, marketers can attract group of people who search for

these values in a car.

4. Culture:

A brand represents a specific culture. Mercedes Benz is a brand that

represents German culture: efficient and organized.

14

5. Personality:

A brand can project a personality. For example: the oldest manufacturer of

knitting and craft yarn in United States is “Lion Brand Yarn” with logo a

picture of lion. It represents strong personality (a yarn which is strong and

not easily broken).

6. User:

A brand shows type of customer who buy and use the product. For

example: Mercedes Benz is associated with rich and high class people.

Brand is very important and valuable to marketers. The benefit of brand for the

company (as seller) and customers are:

For the company/manufacturer/seller (Kotler et al, 2011):

1. A brand makes it easy for seller to process the delivery order and track

problems.

2. A brand name or brand mark provides legal protection and unique

characteristic that is different with other products.

3. A brand gives opportunity for seller to attract loyal customers. Loyalty of

a specific brand gives benefit for the company.

4. A brand helps the company to make market segmentation.

5. A strong brand helps create corporate image, make it easier for company

to launch a new brand that is acceptable by both distributors and

customers.

For customers:

1. Easier in identifying needed or wanted product.

2. Time and energy saving through repeat purchase and loyalty to a specific

brand.

3. Give guarantee for consumers that they can get same product with same

quality although they buy it in different places.

15

4. Satisfaction is created through familiarity and intimacy with specific brand

that has been consumed before.

5. Satisfaction is related to the brand logo and how the company

communicates it.

The other reason of importance of brands is it can reduce the risk in product

decision making. There are several risks in product decision, such as:

1. Functional risk: the product doesn’t perform like user’s expectations.

2. Physical risk: the product poses threat to the physical healthiness of the

user.

3. Financial risk: the product is not worth compared to the price the user

must pay.

4. Social risk: the product results in embarrassment from others.

5. Psychological risk: the product affects user’s mentality.

6. Time risk: the product failure results in an opportunity cost of finding

another satisfactory product.

To avoid or minimize the risk, consumers prefer buy products with well-known

brands or brands in which the consumers have good past experience about them

(Keller, 2012). In the end, brand is a valuable asset for a company for a long run.

2.1.3. Brand Equity

Brand equity is a phrase used in marketing industry that describes the value of

having a well-known brand name. Brand equity is very important to be considered

by companies because by having good and clear brand equity, companies know

what to do, what to create in their product and advertisement to attract target

customers. These are several meanings of brand equity by experts, such as:

According to Josh McQueen:

“Brand equity is the difference between the value of the brand to the

consumer and the value of the product without that branding. It is the differential

effect that brand knowledge has on consumer response to the marketing of that

16

brand. A brand with positive brand equity results in consumers less sensitive to

increase of the price, being more accepting the extension of a new brand, and

willing to seek the brand in another distribution channel. On the other hand,

negative brand equity results consumers react less favorably to marketing activity

of the brand.”

According to Aaker:

“Brand equity is a set of asset and liabilities linked to a brand’s name and

symbol that adds to the value provided by a product or service to a firm or firm’s

customers.”

According to Yoo and Donthu:

“Brand equity is consumer’s different response between a focal brand and

an unbranded product when both have the same level of the marketing stimuli and

product attributes.”

Some studies of brand equity based on marketing experts (Taleghani, 2011) can

be seen in the table below:

Table 2.1 Brand Equity Studies

Author Dimensions of Brand

Equity

Related Findings

Keller (1993) Brand awareness, brand

image

Customer-based brand

equity occurs when

consumer is familiar with

the brand and hold strong

and unique brand

association in their

memory.

Cobb-Walgren, Ruble, Perceived quality, brand Brand with greater

17

and Donthu (1995) awareness, brand

associations, advertising

awareness

advertising budget

yielded substantially

higher level of brand

equity. In turn, brand with

higher equity generated

greater preference and

purchase intentions.

Aaker (1996) Brand loyalty, perceived

quality, brand awareness,

brand association

Four dimensions of brand

equity represent customer

perception and can be

applied across markets.

Berry (2000) Brand awareness, brand

meaning

Positive service brand

equity emerges from the

synergy of brand

awareness and brand

meaning.

Source: Adjusted by Researcher (2014)

Based on those definitions above, brand equity is a valuable asset for company

that has specific stimuli to customers. Aaker divide brand equity into 5 aspects.

Aaker’s brand equity model is:

18

Figure 2.1 Brand Equity Aspects

Source: Strategic Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity (2008)

2.1.3.1. Brand Loyalty

Brand loyalty is the extent of faithfulness of consumers to a particular brand. It is

usually expressed through repeat purchases of a specific brand, instead of trying

another brand. The meaning of brand loyalty by some experts, such as:

According to American Marketing Association:

“Brand loyalty is the situation in which a consumer generally buys the

same manufacturer-originated product or service repeatedly over time rather

than buying from multiple suppliers within the category; or the degree to which a

consumer consistently purchases the same brand within a product class.”

19

According to Aaker:

“Brand loyalty reflects how likely a customer will be to switch to another

brand, especially when that brand makes a change in price, product features,

communication, or distribution programs.”

Brand loyalty represents the core of brand equity. However, brand loyalty can’t be

analyzed without considering its relationship to other dimensions of brand equity

like brand awareness, brand association, perceived quality, and other proprietary

asset.

Generally, brand loyalty is consumers’ preference when they buy a particular

brand in a product category. Loyalty occurs because consumers perceive that the

brand is good, offers features that they want, quality with price at the right time.

This perception will become foundation for a new buying behavior. Basically,

consumers will make trial purchase of a specific product brand and until they feel

satisfied with a specific brand, they tend to form habits and continue buying the

same brand.

David Aaker defines brand loyalty into 5 levels, ranging from not loyal to very

loyal. The Aaker’s brand loyalty pyramid is:

Figure 2.2 Brand Loyalty Level Pyramid

Source: Strategic Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity (2008)

20

1. Switchers:

Switchers are people who aren’t loyal to specific brands and are

completely indifferent to brands. Each brand is perceived to be adequate if

the price is acceptable for them. They tend to buy a brand in sale or they

happen to stumble upon. As marketers, the most effective to target these

consumers by focusing on raise name awareness because it is possible that

these consumers will move up the pyramid.

2. Habitual buyer:

On this level, consumers buy a brand out of habit. They are reasonably

satisfied with the brand, at least they aren’t felt dissatisfied about the

brand. However, if they find better product with another brand or they find

it hard to buy they usual brand, they will be likely to switch to another

brand.

3. Satisfied buyer:

Those are buyers who satisfied with a specific brand due to switching cost

(loss of time, money, or other advantage if they switch brand). In order to

make these buyers to switch brand, competitors must create incentive and

offer larger benefit that can cover the switching cost.

4. Likes the brand:

Consumers on this level are satisfied with the brand. They don’t only

satisfied because of rational benefits (price, time, quality) only, but also

because of emotional benefits (have emotional attachment to the brand

because of good experience with the brand). The consumers can also be

called true brand enthusiasts.

5. Committed buyer:

Committed buyers are consumers who are proud of having or using the

brand because it gives them both emotional benefit and functional benefit.

It also represents their personality as well. Committed buyers also

recommend the brand to other people.

21

In David Aaker’s Brand Equity Model, people who are loyal to a brand are

expressed in the following factors (Eurib, 2009), such as:

1. Reduced marketing costs: hanging on loyal customers is cheaper than

potential new customers.

2. Trade leverage: loyal customers represent a stable source of revenue for

the distributive trade.

3. Attracting new customers: current loyal customers can boost name

awareness and bring new customers.

4. Time to respond to competitive threats: loyal customers aren’t quick in

switching brands, so it gives company more time to respond the

competition.

Based on Giddens (2010), brand loyalists have following mindset:

1. “I am committed to this brand.”

2. “I am willing to pay a higher price for this brand over other brands.”

3. “I will recommend this brand to others.”

This shows that people who are brand loyalist are very valuable for companies

because they are willing to pay higher price and also committed to the brand.

They also will recommend the brand to other people which means the company

can get more customers and gain higher profit.

2.1.3.2. Brand Awareness

The other aspect of brand equity is brand awareness. Awareness is a key

determinant identified in almost all brand equity models. Some definitions of

brand awareness by some experts are (Fayrene et al., 2009):

According to Keller:

“Awareness is the customers’ ability to recall and recognize the brand as

reflected by their ability to identify the brand under different conditions and to

link the brand name, logo, symbol, and so forth to certain associations in memory.

22

Brand awareness is related to the strength of the brand node or trace in memory,

as reflected by consumers’ ability to identify the brand under different

conditions.”

According to Aaker:

“Brand awareness is the extent to which a brand is known among the

public.”

According to Rangkuti (Rangkuti, 2004):

“Brand awareness is the ability for customers to remember a particular

brand or advertising spontaneously or after they are stimulated with key words

related to the brand.”

According to Temporal (2010):

“An enormous amount of brand awareness can get the consumers

interested.”

Brand awareness is the ability of customers to recognize, recall, or identify a

specific brand. If customers are aware with particular brand, they can easily

remember the brand or whenever they see or hear things that related to the brand,

they can easily recognize the brand.

Keller defines brand awareness as customers’ ability to recall and recognize a

specific brand (Djakeli et al., 2011):

“Brand recognition is the ability of consumer to recognize prior

knowledge of brand when they are asked questions about that brand or when they

are shown that specific brand; the consumers can clearly differentiate the brand

as having being earlier noticed or heard.”

“Brand recall is the potential of customer to recover a brand from his

memory when given the product class/category, needs satisfied by that category

or buying scenario as a signal. In other words, it refers that consumers should

23

correctly recover brand from the memory when given a clue or he can recall the

specific brand when the product category is mentioned.”

Brand awareness can play an important role in consumer decision making, such

as:

1. By affecting inclusion in consideration set.

2. By affecting likelihood of choice in low involvement settings (due to lack

consumer motivation and ability).

3. By affecting creation of brand associations and brand image.

However, Aaker identifies higher level of awareness beside recognition and recall

(Shimp, 2010). The level of awareness is:

Figure 2.3 Brand Awareness Level Pyramid

Source: Advertising Promotion and Other Aspects of Integrated Marketing Communications

1. Unaware of brand: brand awareness is not existed in this level.

2. Brand recognition: it is an aided brand recall. Brand recognition is crucial

to the point of purchase decision.

24

3. Brand recall: it is when customers are asked to list the brand in a certain

product category.

4. Top of mind: the highest level of brand awareness in which customers

name the one most salient brand in a product category.

Brand awareness is the extent to which a brand is known among the public and it

is expressed with following factors (Eurib, 2009):

1. Anchor to which associations can be attached.

2. Familiarity and liking: consumers with positive attitude towards a brand

will talk about it more and spread brand awareness.

3. Commitment of the brand.

4. Brand to be considered during purchasing process.

Brand awareness can be created into the mind of people by focusing on several

things (Durianto et al., 2004), such as:

1. The message should be unique, different, and easily memorable. The

message can also use jingle or slogan to be easily remembered by people.

2. Repetition of the message to create reminders in the mind of people.

3. Extend the brand, so people will remember more brands.

4. Increase the promotion of the brand.

5. Become a sponsor of an event that brings many people (viewers).

2.1.3.3. Brand Association

Brand association is the thoughts that are linked to the brand in the consumer

memory. A set of associations may represent the underlying value of the brand.

Based on some experts, brand association is:

According to Rangkuti (2004):

“Brand association is everything that is related to memory about a brand.

This association is an attribute that is available in that brand itself and it has a

level of strength. Linkage to the brand will be higher if the customers have many

25

experiences with the brand. Various associations that are remembered by people

can be assembled to form an impression of brand image.”

According to Durianto (2004):

“Brand association is all impression that comes to mind related with their

memory about a brand. A strong brand will get prominent position in competition

if it is supported by many strong associations. Various brand association that is

integrated, the stronger the brand image that is owned by the brand.”

In short, brand association is associations triggered by a brand that has several

functions (Eurib, 2009), such as:

1. Help process or retrieve information: the extent to which a brand name is

able to ‘retrieve’ associations from consumers’ brain (example:

information from TV advertising).

2. Differentiation: association contributes to brand differentiation among

competitors.

3. Buying process: brand association plays a role in buying process (the

greater this extent, the higher the total brand equity).

4. Create positive attitude/feeling: brand association can create positive

attitude/feeling that is felt by customers. Past experience about the brand

can create positive attitude, which later create good association between

the customer and that brand.

5. Basis for extensions: the greater the number of brand extension in the

market, the greater the opportunity to add brand association.

Based on Aaker, there are several attributes of brand association (Durianto, 2004),

such as:

1. Perceived value:

One of brand identity role is to create value proposition that is related to

functional benefit which is the basic of brand in almost every product

class. If a brand doesn’t have value, it will be easy to be beaten by

26

competitors. Brand value can be measured by proofing that the value is

worth with how much the consumers pay for the product. There are 5

boosters that create perceived value which is related to customer

satisfaction, such as:

a. Product quality dimension: Product quality is the first customer

satisfaction.

b. Price dimension: For price sensitive consumers, they feel satisfied

if they buy product which is value for money.

c. Service quality dimension: Human factor gives the biggest

contribution in service quality. Thus, service quality is relatively

harder to be measured compared to product quality.

d. Emotional dimension: It contains aesthetic, brand personality, and

self expressive value.

e. Easiness dimension: Customers will feel more satisfied if they can

use the product easily, comfortably, and efficiently.

2. Brand personality:

Personality relates the emotional bond of a brand with the benefit of the

brand itself as the basis for brand differentiation and customer

relationship.

3. Organization association:

Organization association will be an important factor if the brand is similar

with other brand attributes, or if corporate brand is involved in the

organization.

2.1.3.4. Perceived Quality

Customers always have their own perception about the quality of a specific brand.

Based on some experts, there are definitions of perceived quality:

27

According to Keller (2008):

“Perceived quality is customers’ perception of the overall quality or

superiority of a product or service compared to alternatives and with respect to

its intended purpose.”

According to Aaker:

“Perceived quality is the consumers’ perception about the entire quality

about a product or service that is same with what they expect it to be. It is defined

as consumers’ judgment about a product’s overall excellence or superiority.”

Perceived quality create several values, such as (Eurib, 2009):

1. Reason to buy:

The quality offered by the product or brand is a reason to buy it.

Information, money, and time limitation make ones purchasing decision is

highly related to their perception of the brand quality in their mind, so the

purchasing decision only based on perceived quality of a brand that they

are going to buy.

2. Differentiation or position:

The other value is level of differentiation or position in relation to

competing brands, whether the brand is highly optimum, valuable, or

economical; whether the brand is the best in its segment or just relatively

competitive compared to other brands.

3. A price premium:

As the product becomes more complex to assess and status is at play,

consumers tend to take price as a quality indicator. One of the advantages

of quality perception is it gives more room to decide premium price.

Premium price will increase the profit and people see that as high quality

product or brand.

28

4. Channel member interest:

Distributors will be motivated to distribute a brand with high perceived

quality. It will give them more profit compared to a brand with lower

perceived quality.

5. Brand extensions:

A product with strong perceived quality can be used to introduce a new

product category (brand extension) because the successful chance will be

higher rather than a brand with lower perceived quality. This can tell

consumers the brand stands for a certain quality guarantee that is

applicable on a wide scale.

2.1.3.5. Other Proprietary Asset

Basically, a brand is an asset. Examples of other proprietary asset here are patents,

intellectual property rights, and relations with trade partners. The more proprietary

rights a brand has accumulated, the greater the brand’s competitive edge in those

fields (Eurib, 2009).

2.1.4. Consumer Buying Behavior

Realize it or not, people as customers create a specific behavior when they buy

product or service, they have pattern when they buy a product or service.

According to Kotler and Armstrong (2012), consumer buying behavior is the

buying behavior of final consumers – individuals and households that buy goods

or services for personal consumption. Moreover, consumer behavior is centralized

to how individuals make decision to utilize their own available resources (time,

money, effort) to buy a product or service to be consumed by them (Shiffman et

al., 2009)

Consumer behavior is affected by several factors including attitude toward a

certain product, service, or brand. Consumers evaluate products based on their

important features. Furthermore, products presented by competitors under other

29

brands are different in terms of these features. This creates different attitudes

toward different brands in consumers. It is quite critical to have knowledge over

individual attitudes in order to predict or direct consumer behavior in markets.

Finally, in some stage following buying a product, customer starts evaluating

goods and their efficiencies based on his/her expectations. A satisfied customer

will send a positive feedback on product/service and recommend it to friends or

family members. Satisfied customers will buy other products/services from the

same company in an ongoing trend and may even pay extra amounts to obtain

their preferred products (Namin et al., 2012).

There are several factors that influence consumer behavior (Kotler et al., 2010):

Figure 2.4 Factors Influence Consumer Behavior

Source: Principle of Marketing (2010)

1. Cultural:

a. Culture is the learned values, perceptions, wants, and behavior

from family and other important institutions.

b. Subcultures are groups of people within a culture with shared value

systems based on common life experiences and situations.

c. Social classes are society’s relatively permanent and ordered

divisions whose members share similar values, interests, and

behaviors and are measured by a combination of occupation,

income, education, wealth, and other variables.

30

2. Social:

a. Reference groups are groups that form a comparison or reference

in forming attitudes or behavior.

b. Family is the most important consumer-buying organization in

society.

c. The groups, family, clubs, and organizations that a person belongs

to define his/her social role and status.

3. Personal:

a. Age and life-cycle stage: People buy different goods or services in

their lifetime. Their needs and wants about specific good or service

related to their age. What their need or want will be different when

they still kids and when they are adults.

b. Occupation and economic situation affect the goods and services

bought by consumers: personal income that can be expended,

savings, and their behavior about expend the money or debt.

c. Lifestyle is a person’s pattern of living as expressed in his or her

psychographics, pattern of acting and interacting in the

environment.

d. Personality and self-concept refer to the unique psychological

characteristics that lead to consistent and lasting responses to the

consumer’s environment.

4. Psychological:

a. A motive is a need that is sufficiently pressing to direct the person

to seek satisfaction.

Maeslow’s hierarchy of needs shows 5 levels of human needs:

31

Figure 2.5 Maeslow’s Hierarchy of Needs

Source: Principle of Marketing (2010)

b. Perception is the process by which people select, organize, and

interpret information to form a meaningful picture of the world

from three perceptual processes:

1) Selective attention is the tendency for people to screen out

most of the information to which they are exposed.

2) Selective distortion is the tendency for people to interpret

information in a way that will support what they already

believe.

3) Selective retention is the tendency to remember good points

made about a brand they favor and forget good points about

competing brands.

c. Learning is the change in an individual’s behavior arising from

experience.

d. Belief is a descriptive thought that a person has about something

based on knowledge, opinion, and faith. Attitudes describe a

32

person’s relatively consistent evaluations, feelings, and tendencies

toward an object or idea.

In consumer buying decision, there are 5 steps that consumers go through (Kotler

et al., 2012). Marketers need to focus on entire process rather than purchase

decision only. The consumer buying decision steps are:

Figure 2.6 Consumer Buying Decision Steps

Source: Marketing Management (Kotler et al., 2009)

1. Need recognition:

The first step of buyer decision process that occurs when buyer recognizes

a problem or need triggered by internal stimuli (human basic need,

example: hunger or thirst) or external stimuli (example: a person talk

about cars with his friend and it might get him thinking on buying a new

car).

2. Information search:

An interested consumer may or may not search for information before they

buy a product or service. If consumer’s drive is strong and satisfying

product is near at hand, he is likely to buy it then. If not, he will search for

information first related to the need. For example: a person who wants to

buy a car will search information about type of cars, price, and other

information that he needs; pay more attention to car ads; come to car

exhibition, etc.

A consumer can get information from several sources like:

a. Personal sources: family and friends.

b. Commercial sources: advertising, internet.

33

c. Public sources: mass media, consumer organizations.

d. Experiential sources: handling, examining, using the product.

3. Evaluation of alternatives:

How the consumer uses and processes information to evaluate alternative

brands in the choice set.

4. Purchase decision:

The act by the consumer to buy the most preferred brand. The purchase

decision can be affected by attitudes of others (example: if someone

closest to a person advice that he should buy low price car, he most

probably will buy that car) or an unexpected situational factors (for

example: a person already know what car he wants to buy based on his

actual budget, but suddenly another car brand has a great discount and he

probably think again of what brand he should buy).

5. Post-purchase behavior:

The stage which consumers take further action after purchase based on

their satisfaction or dissatisfaction that the consumers fell with a purchase.

In post-purchase behavior, there is a relationship between consumer’s

expectation and product’s perceived performance. The larger the gap

between expectation and performance, the greater the consumer’s

dissatisfaction is. Moreover, customer satisfaction is very important for

companies because it is a key to building profitable relationships with

consumers, to keeping and growing consumers, and reaping their customer

lifetime value.

In the end, understanding consumer buying decision is very important because by

knowing what steps that consumers go through and analyzing what are their

behaviors, companies can create things that are needed to stimulate them to buy

the product or service.

34

2.2. Previous Research

There are several researches about the correlation and influence of brand equity

aspects to consumer buying decision, such as:

Table 2.2 Brand Equity Past Research

No Author Year Source Construct Findings

1. Darma

Kusuma

Moh. Zen

2012 Analysis

influence of

brand equity to

consumer

buying

decision of

isotonic drink

Pocari Sweat

Brand

awareness,

brand

association,

perceived

quality,

consumer

buying

decision

All aspects of

brand equity

(brand awareness,

brand association,

and perceived

quality) have

influence

significantly to

buying decision

of Pocari Sweat.

2. Yusuf

Kurniawan

2010 Analysis

influence of

brand equity to

buying

decision: case

study of

isotonic drink

Fatigon Hydro

in Purwokerto

Brand

loyalty,

brand

awareness,

perceived

quality,

brand

association,

consumer

buying

decision

All aspects of

brand equity have

significant

influence to

consumer buying

decision of

Fatigon Hydro

product.

35

No Author Year Source Construct Findings

3. Silvia Ika

Cahyani

2012 Effect of brand

equity to

customer

buying

decision of

isotonic drink

Pocari Sweat

in Surabaya

Brand

equity,

consumer

buying

decision

Brand equity has

positive impact to

consumer buying

decision of Pocari

Sweat isotonic

drink in Surabaya.

4. Hamza Salim

Khraim

2011 International

Journal of

Marketing

Studies (Vol.3,

Issue 2)

Brand

Loyalty,

Consumer

Buying

Behavior

Brand loyalty has

a significant

correlation in

consumer buying

decision, but it’s

not easy to

maintain

consumer loyalty

of a specific

product because

many forces

drawing them

away (high

competition).

5. Elif Akagün

Ergin,

Handan

Özdemir,

Bülent

Özsaçmacı

2006 International

Business &

Economics

Research

Journal (Vol.5,

No.8)

Brand

association

There is a

correlation

between brand

association and

decision buying

process.

Consumers who

mostly develop

36

successful brand

association, have

significant place

for brands in

memory.

Source: Adjusted by Researcher (2014)

2.3. Theoretical Framework

The theoretical framework for this research is as below:

Figure 2.7 Theoretical Framework

Source: Adapted from Wahyu (2012)

2.4. Hypotheses

The hypotheses for this research are:

H01: There is influence of brand loyalty toward consumer buying decision.

H02: There is influence of brand awareness toward consumer buying decision.

H03: There is influence of brand association toward consumer buying decision.

H04: There is influence of brand loyalty, brand awareness, and brand association

toward consumer buying decision.

Brand Loyalty (X1)

Brand Awareness (X2) Consumer

Buying

Decision (Y) Brand Association (X3)

H01

H02

H03

H04

37

CHAPTER III

METHODOLOGY

This chapter analyzes the research methodology that is used in this research which

involves several objectives, such as: research design, population and sampling

design, data analysis tools, questionnaire, validation and reliability process, and

data preparation.

3.1. Research Method

In making a research, there are two methods that differentiate one with another.

Those methods are quantitative method and qualitative method. Those methods

have their own characteristic that differentiates between one another. Each method

also has its own strength and weakness.

Quantitative method focuses on numbers or quantities. Quantitative studies have

results that are based on numerical analysis and statistic. It is ideal to have large

number of participant for this study because this gives analysis more statistical

power. Based on Render, Stair, JR, and Mich. Hanna (2008), quantitative analysis

is the scientific approach to managerial decision making. Whim, emotions, and

guesswork are not part of the quantitative analysis approach.

In the other hand, qualitative research studies focuses on differences in quality,

rather than in quantity. Results are in words or pictures rather than numbers. It

usually has fewer participants than quantitative studies because the depth of the

data collection doesn’t allow for large number of participants. According to

Denzin and Lincoln (2011), qualitative research involves an interpretive and

naturalistic approach, which means that qualitative research study things in their

natural settings, attempting to make sense of or to interpret phenomena in terms of

the meanings people bring to them.

38

A particular strength of quantitative research is that statistical analysis allows for

generalization to others. A goal of quantitative research is to choose a sample that

closely resembles the population. Qualitative research does not seek to choose

samples that are representative of populations.

However, qualitative data does provide a depth and richness of data not possible

with quantitative data. Although there are fewer participants, the researchers

generally know more details about each participant. Quantitative researchers

collect data on more participants, so it is not possible to have the depth and

breadth of knowledge about each. On this research, researcher uses quantitative

method to conduct this study.

3.2. Research Design

Research design is a framework or blueprint for conducting the marketing

research project. It specifies the details of the procedures necessary for obtaining

the information needed to structure and solve marketing research problems

(Malhotra, 2010).

Descriptive research design is a scientific method which involves observing and

describing the behavior of a subject without influencing it in any way. It is used to

obtain information concerning the current status of the phenomena to describe

“what exists” with respects to variables or conditions in a situation. The method

involves range from the survey which describes the status quo, the correlation

study which investigates the relationship between variables, to developmental

studies which seek to determine changes over time. Descriptive research is a type

of conclusive research that has as its major objective the description of something,

usually market characteristics or functions (Malhotra, 2010). In short, descriptive

research design is research design in which the major emphasis is on determining

the frequency with which something occurs or the extent to which two variables

covary.

39

Cross-sectional design is a type of research design involving the collection of

information from any given sample of population elements only once (Malhotra,

2010). On this research, researcher uses descriptive research design with cross-

sectional design as time horizon.

3.3. Research Instrument

3.3.1. Data Collection

On this research, researcher uses two sources to gain information, which are

primary data and secondary data. Primary data is main data that researcher needs

to conduct the study. Researcher gains the data by doing survey and distributing

questionnaires to third parties. On the other hand, secondary data is the data that

have been already collected by and readily available from other sources which are

cheaper and easier to be obtained. Moreover, according to Maholtra, secondary

data is data collected for some purpose other than the problem at hand. The major

advantages of using secondary data in market research are time and cost savings.

1. Primary Data:

Researcher gains primary data by doing a survey to sample of population.

Researcher makes a questionnaire that consist questions about studied

topic and distributes them to third parties that are qualified and fulfill the

requirement that the researcher set to conduct this study.

The questionnaires that the researcher spread to the participant consist of

two parts, such as:

a. Demography: This is about the profile of respondent. The purpose

is for researcher to know the demographic profile of the sample.

For this study, the first part of the questionnaire consists of gender

(male and female).

40

b. Second part is about statements that represent brand loyalty, brand

awareness, brand association, and consumer buying decision. The

questionnaires are made online, and then distributed to qualified

respondents which are President University students. On the

second part of the questionnaire, it contains 22 questions under 4

variables (brand loyalty, brand awareness, brand association, and

consumer buying decision).

2. Secondary Data:

Researcher also gains secondary data through several sources or media,

such as: internet, journals, e-journal, and books that are related to this

study.

3.3.2. Data Collection Technique

In order to gain data needed to do the research, researcher uses some methods or

techniques to get the data, such as:

1. Survey (questionnaire):

Survey method is a structured questionnaire given to a sample of a

population and designed to elicit specific information from

respondents. In structured data collection, a formal questionnaire is

prepared that presents questions in a prearranged order (Malhotra,

2010). Questionnaire itself is a set of questions given to a sample of

people. The purpose is to gather information about the people’s

attitudes, thoughts, behaviors, and so forth. It is one of the most

common and popular tools to gather data from a large number of

people (Lanthier, 2002). The researcher will use a survey method in

structured questionnaire in order to get more information for the

research purpose.

41

2. Library Research:

Library research is one of the quickest and least costly ways to

discover hypotheses. Library research is a study in which the

researcher searches, analyzes, makes interpretation, and generalizes

fact that is got from textbooks, journals, or magazine. Furthermore,

researcher also searches data from the internet to support the fact.

3.3.3. Measurement Scale and Data Analysis

3.3.3.1. Measurement Scale

Itemized rating scale is a measurement scale having numbers or brief descriptions

associated with each category, in which the categories are ordered in terms of

scale position and the respondents are required to select the specified category that

best describes the object being rated. Measurement scale that researcher uses is

Likert Scale. Likert Scale is an ordered, one-dimensional scale from which

respondents choose one option that best aligns with their view that is developed

by Rensis Likert. The data from Likert scale are primarily interval. Interval scale

is a scale in which the numbers are used to rate objects such that numerically

equal distances on the scale represent equal distances in the characteristic being

measured. Likert scale is also and possesses scale characteristic, such as:

1. Description: the unique labels or descriptors that are used to designate

each value of the scale.

2. Order: the relative sizes or positions of the descriptors.

3. Distance: the characteristic in which absolute differences between scale

descriptors are known and may be expressed in units (Malhotra, 2010).

In this research, data is interpreted using five-Likert Scale. Based on Sugiyono

(2009) the relative grading system for each dimension is:

42

Table 3.1 Likert Scale

Statement Score

Strongly Agree 5

Agree 4

Neither Agree Nor Disagree (Neutral) 3

Disagree 2

Strongly Disagree 1

Source: Metode Penelitian Bisnis (Sugiyono, 2009)

3.3.3.2. Data Analysis

To do this analysis, SPSS 16.0 (Statistical Package for Social Science version 16)

for Windows is used. SPSS 16.0 is used by the researcher to process the raw data

from the questionnaires and to find out whether the data is valid or not (validity

and reliability test), and also to find out the result by processing multiple

regression.

3.4. Validity and Reliability

3.4.1. Validity Test

Validity is the extent to which differences in observed scale scores reflect true

differences among objects on the characteristic being measured, rather than

systematic or random errors (Malhotra, 2010). The validity test helps the

researcher to ensure that the questions in the questionnaire are valid and able to be

measured. The purpose is to test how well the instrument measures particular

concept that would like to be measured (Sekaran, 2003).

To test the validity, the researcher uses Pearson Product Moment correlation

formula as below:

43

Source: Berenson, Levine, Timothy (2011)

Where:

n = the number of paired observations

Σ X = the X variable summed

Σ Y = the Y variable summed

Σ X2 = the X variable squared and the squares summed

(Σ X) 2 = the X variable summed and the sum squared

Σ Y2 = the Y variable squared and the squared summed

(Σ Y) 2 = the Y variable summed and the sum squared

Σ XY = the sum of the product of X and Y

Minimum standard in order to fulfill validity test is if r = 0.3, in which if r < 0.3 it

is considered invalid. The researcher uses 0.05 for significance level in this

validity test.

3.4.2. Reliability Test

Reliability is the extent to which a scale produces consistent results if repeated

measurements are made on the characteristic (Malhotra, 2010). Reliability is

index numbers that show the consistency of a measuring device to measure the

same indication. Each measuring device should have the ability to produce

consistent measurement result.

The researcher uses Cronbach’s alpha measurement to test the reliability.

Cronbach’s alpha (coefficient alpha) is a measure of internal consistency

reliability that is the average of all possible split-half coefficients resulting from

different splitting of the scale items. This coefficient varies from 0 to 1, and a

value of 0.6 or less generally indicates unsatisfactory internal consistency

44

reliability (Malhotra, 2010). Therefore, it is considered reliable if Cronbach’s

alpha exceeds 0.6.

3.5. Sampling Design

3.5.1. Sampling Technique

Population is about people, and the dwellings, locations and environment that

people live in which can be defined in many ways, for example: by age, ethnicity,

or location. Based on Joan Joseph Castillo (2009), a research population is

generally a large collection of individuals or objects that is the main focus of a

scientific query and it is for the benefit of the population that researches are done.

Sample is a subgroup of the elements of the population selected for participation

in the study (Malhotra, 2010). Sampling is the process of selecting unit (e.g:

people, organization) from a population of interest so that by studying the sample

we may fairly generalize our results back to the population from which they were

chosen. Based on Martyn Shuttleworth (2009), the advantages of sampling are:

1. It involves a smaller amount of subjects, which reduces investment in time

and money.

2. Sampling can actually be more accurate than studying an entire

population, because it affords researchers a lot more control over the

subjects. Large studies can bury interesting correlations amongst the

‘noise.'

3. Statistical manipulations are much easier with smaller data sets, and it is

easier to avoid human error when inputting and analyzing the data.

Non-probability sampling represents a group of sampling technique that helps

researchers to select unit from a population that they are interested in studying. It

relies on the personal judgment of the researcher rather than chance to select

sample elements. Subjects in a non-probability sample are usually selected on the

basis of their accessibility or by the purposive personal judgment of the

45

researcher. In non-probability sampling, there is an assumption that there is an

even distribution of characteristics within the population.

Convenience sampling is a non-probability sampling technique where subjects are

selected because of their convenient accessibility and proximity to the researcher.

The subjects are selected just because they are easiest to recruit for the study in

the area. Researcher uses convenience non-probability sampling to get sample for

the research.

3.5.2. Sampling Size

Sample is parts of total and characteristic that is owned by population. In short,

sample represents population. To know how many sample that is needed for

researcher to gain data, researcher uses formula by Ariestonandri:

Where:

n = total sample

p = estimated population proportion (if it’s unknown, p = 0.5)

q = (1-p)

Za = confidence interval

e = error sampling

Confidence interval that researcher uses is 95% or α = 0.05, so Za = 1.96 and

estimation of error is 5%. Therefore, the sample size is:

46

n ≥ 0.5 x 0.5 (1.96 / 0.1)2

n ≥ 96.04 ≈ 97

The minimum sample that the researcher must take is 97 respondents. However,

researcher distributes questionnaire to 100 people as sample.

3.6. Statistical Tools

3.6.1. Multiple Regression

Multiple regression is a statistical technique that simultaneously develops a

mathematical relationship between two or more independent variables and an

interval-scaled dependent variable (Malhotra, 2010). Multiple regression is a

practical extension of simple regression in which it allows user to build a model

with several independent variables (Stair, JR, and Hanna; 2009). The form of

multiple regression model is as below:

Y = β0 + β1X1 + β2X2 + β3X3 + ε

Where:

Y = consumer buying decision

β0 = Y intercept

β1 – β3 = regression coefficient of brand loyalty, brand awareness, and brand

association

47

X1 = brand loyalty

X2 = brand awareness

X3 = brand association

ε = error

To see the correlation between dependent and independent variable in this

research, there are 3 requirements that have to be fulfilled to pass the regression

model. Those are normality test, multicollinearity test, and heteroskedasticity test.

3.6.2. Correlation Test

Correlation test is a test to know whether there is a significant relationship

between each independent variable to dependent variable. Researcher uses

Pearson Product Moment Correlation Test (r). It is significant if the Sig. result is

less than 0.05 (Sig. < 0.05). The interpretation of coefficient r is shown below:

Table 3.2 Interpretation Coefficient R

Coefficient Interval (r) Relationship Level

0.8 -1.00 Very strong

0.6 – 0.799 Strong

0.4 – 0.599 Moderately strong

0.2 – 0.399 Low

0.00 – 0.199 Very low

Source: Metode Penelitian Bisnis (Sugiyono, 2009)

3.6.3. Normality Test

Normality test is a test of whether independent variable and dependent variable

are normally distributed or not. A regression is good if the independent and

dependent variable are distributed close to normal. There is a specific plot and

48

statistic that can be used to test the normality, which is by using normal

probability plot. If data is normally distributed, the dots of the plot should be on a

straight line. To detect the normality, it can be seen if the dots spread around the

diagonal line and follow the diagonal line (straight line). If the dots spread away

or not follow the diagonal line, it means it is not normally distributed (Gazhali,

2009). Graphical method is also can be used to see whether the data is normal

distribution or not. If the shape of histogram is in bell shape, it means the data is

normally distributed. In this research, researcher uses both normal probability plot

(P-P plot) and histogram to show the data is normally distributed or not.

3.6.3. Multicollinearity Test

Multicollinearity is a state of very high intercorrelations among independent

variables (Malhotra, 2010). The purpose of multicollinearity test is to show

whether there is a strong correlation between independent variables. If the

multicollinearity is high (VIF > 10), it means there is a strong correlation between

independent variables and one of the variables should be discard from multiple

regression model.

3.6.4. Heteroskedasticity Test

Heteroskedasticity refers to unequal variance in the regression errors. The purpose

is to know whether the data is normal distribution or not and whether variance

terms of errors are difference across observations. The heteroskedasticity test can

be seen from residual plot. If the plots are distributed randomly without

systematic pattern, then the data is passed the heteroskedasticity test.

3.6.5. F Test

To know whether there is a significant relationship between dependent and

independent variable, F-test is used. Moreover, F-test is also can be used to see

whether the regression model that is used right or not.

49

Where

F = statistic test for F distribution

R2 = coefficient of determination

n = number of total sample

k = number of independent variable in the model

Hypothesis:

1. H0: β1 = β2 = β3 = 0 if significant F ≥ 0.05, accept H0

2. Ha: at least there is one β ≠ 0 if significant F < 0.05, reject H0

Researcher uses 0.05 as level of significance.

3.6.6. T Test

T test is a test with purpose to determine the influence of each independent

variable toward dependent variable.

Hypothesis:

1. H01: β1 = 0 if significant T ≥ 0.05, accept H0

2. Ha1: β1 ≠ 0 if significant T < 0.05, reject H0

3. H02: β2 = 0 if significant T ≥ 0.05, accept H0

4. Ha2: β2 ≠ 0 if significant T < 0.05, reject H0

5. H03: β3 = 0 if significant T ≥ 0.05, accept H0

6. Ha3: β3 ≠ 0 if significant T < 0.05, reject H0

On this research, researcher uses 0.05 as level of significance (α = 0.05).

50

3.7. Limitation of the Research

Due to tight schedule (time), budget, and other reason; the researcher has several

limitations, such as:

1. The population that the researcher chooses is President University students

with Indonesian nation, despite of any gender and batch.

2. The questionnaires are distributed to students who have consumed Mizone

isotonic drink.

51

CHAPTER IV

ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

This chapter discuss about all important information and findings that researcher

got from this study, as well as brief company profile. The findings will be divided

into two main issues. The first part is about the demographic profile of the sample

(or respondent profile) and it will be shown in the form of diagrams and graphs. In

the second part of the research, researcher will give the result of data processing

and data analysis from SPSS 16.0.

4.1. Company Profile

PT. Aqua Golden Mississippi was built in 1973 by Tirto Utomo, as the pioneer of

packaged mineral water in Indonesia. On 1998, AQUA (under PT. Tirta

Investama) joined with DANONE Group, which is one of the biggest packaged

mineral water in the world. The company has 4 values, such as:

1. Humanity: consists of share, responsibility, and appreciation to others.

Share means honest with ourselves and others, create dialog, openness,

and teamwork. Responsibility means paying attention to human and

product safety carefully, as well to nature and society. Appreciation to

others means sensitive to cultural differences, treat people with same

respect, and help develop business partners.

2. Proximity: consists of accessible, credibility, and empathy. Accessible

means the management style is easy to access and flexible. Credibility

means honest to self and responsible of all taken action. Empathy means

dealing with consumers and suppliers in a genuine way and create good

relationship with them.

3. Openness: consists of curiosity, agility, and dialogue. Curiosity means

aware of what is done now and actively make future plan, open to new

ideas. Agility means symbolizes spirit and energy, quickly react to various

52

situation in a flexible attitude. Dialogue means management style which is

informal, actively listen in an open discussion.

4. Enthusiasm: consists of courage, spirit, and desire to accept challenge.

Courage means able to think freely and act independently, take risk and

seek for new paths differently, and confidently cope with failure. Spirit

means work and lead with confidence. Desire to accept challenge means

eager to grow and lead with optimistic thinking.

The strength of Mizone compared to other isotonic brand that is claimed by

Mizone is:

1. Rehydrate: Mizone can defeat dehydration because it contains electrolit.

2. Refresh-replenish: Mizone is faster in backing the best performance of

body.

3. Recharge-refuel: Mizone gives vitamin and carbohydrate for body to

maximize the energy in doing daily activities.

4. Mizone is a trustworthy product because it is produced by DANONE

Aqua which is very experienced in producing packaged drinks.

Mizone has several flavors, such as: Inspiring Lychee Lemon, Passionate Passion

Fruit, Liven Up Orange Lime, Dazzling Apple Guava, Ur Flava Mangga Kweni,

Coolin' Blewah (Special for Ramadan), CocoPina. In 2012, Mizone City Project

Campaign is chosen as the most outstanding brand campaign in social media by

Mix Magazine.

Figure 4.1 Mizone

53

4.2. Data Analysis

4.2.1. Respondent Profile

For this research, researcher sends 100 questionnaires to President University

students who have consumed Mizone. The purpose is to know the overall

characteristic of people who consume Mizone. On September 27, 2005, the

company tried to enter and compete in isotonic drink market by producing

Mizone. Mizone is an isotonic drink with function to replace lost body fluid.

Mizone with its tagline message “Be 100%” tried to compete with other

competitors who also produced isotonic drink, such as Pocari Sweat and

Powerade Isotonic which were foreign competitors. Seeing the successful of

isotonic drink business in Indonesia, the company produced Mizone as a local

brand to enter the isotonic drink market.

Table 4.1 Table Respondent Profile Based On Gender

Gender Frequency Percentage

Male 41 41%

Female 59 59%

Total 100 100%

Source: Primary Data Excel 2007

Table above shows that the majority of respondent is female. Female respondent

is 59 people or 59% and male respondent is 41 people or 41%.

Figure 4.2 Demographic Views (Gender)

Source: Primary Data Excel 2007

41%

59%

Gender

Male

Female

54

4.2.2. Validity Test

On this research, researcher does a validity test by taking 30 samples from total

100 respondents and researcher uses SPSS 16.0 to compute the result. This

validity test use confidence level 95% with df=n-3. From the r-table, researcher

gets 0.367 as r-table value.

The criteria in validity test are:

1. If r compute < r table, the question is invalid.

2. If r compute (negative) < r table, the question is also invalid.

3. If r compute > r table, then the question is valid.

The result of validity test for this research can be seen in table below:

Table 4.2 Validity Test Result

Variable Question

Number

Corrected-

Item Total

Correlation

(R compute)

R table Pass

Brand

Loyalty (X1)

1 0.664 0.367 Valid

2 0.406 0.367 Valid

3 0.708 0.367 Valid

4 0.854 0.367 Valid

5 0.837 0.367 Valid

Brand

Awareness

(X2)

6 0.845 0.367 Valid

7 0.733 0.367 Valid

8 0.440 0.367 Valid

9 0.914 0.367 Valid

10 0.709 0.367 Valid

Brand

Association

11 0.749 0.367 Valid

12 0.598 0.367 Valid

55

(X3) 13 0.732 0.367 Valid

14 0.736 0.367 Valid

15 0.694 0.367 Valid

Consumer

Buying

Decision (Y)

16 0.896 0.367 Valid

17 0.472 0.367 Valid

18 0.416 0.367 Valid

19 0.849 0.367 Valid

20 0.767 0.367 Valid

21 0.703 0.367 Valid

22 0.573 0.367 Valid

Source: Primary Data SPSS 16.0

In the Table 4.1 above shows that 22 questions under both independent variable

(brand loyalty, brand awareness, and brand association) and dependent variable

(consumer buying decision) are valid because r > 0.361. All questions are valid

and fulfill the requirement. There is no question which r value < 0.361. All results

now can be used to next analysis.

4.2.3. Reliability Test

Researcher uses Cronbach’s Alpha to do reliability test on SPSS 16.0. According

to Malhotra (2010), if Cronbach’s Alpha is less than 0.6 means it is not reliable.

The result for reliability test for this research is:

Table 4.3 Reliability Test Result

Variable Cronbach’s Alpha N of items Reliability

Brand Loyalty 0.867 5 Reliable

Brand Awareness 0.870 5 Reliable

Brand Association 0.860 5 Reliable

Consumer Buying Decision 0.843 7 Reliable

Source: Primary Data SPSS 16.0

56

Table 4.2 shows that the the value of Cronbach’s Alpha is 0.957 which is larger

than 0.6. It means that all the questions under both independent variable and

dependent variable in this study are very reliable.

4.2.4. Correlation Test

The purpose to conduct correlation test is to know whether there is strong

correlation between independent and dependent variable. This test is also

significant if Sig. result is below than 0.05.

Table 4.4 Correlations

From the result above, it is shown that the correlation of brand loyalty to

consumer buying decision is strong (0.700), the correlation of brand awareness to

consumer buying decision is 0.757 which is also strong, and the correlation of

brand association toward consumer buying decision is very strong, which is 0.870.

The figure above shows that there is strong correlation between independent

variable toward dependent variable and they are significant.

4.2.5. Multiple Regression

To use multiple regression, the data must be eligible and there are some

requirements that must be fulfilled, such as:

1. The data must be normally distributed (using Normality Test).

57

2. No heterokedasticity (using using Heterokedasticity Test).

3. No multicollinearity (using Multicollinearity Test).

4.2.6. Normality Test

Normality test is a must for every research that uses multiple regression as the

statistical tool. The purpose of normality test is to know whether samples that

researcher took come from population with normal distribution. To test the

normality of the data, researcher uses both histogram and P-P plot.

Figure 4.3 Histogram

Figure 4.4 P-P Plot

58

Normality test is conducted in order to test whether the data is normally

distributed or not. If data is normal distributed, the histogram must be in bell

shape and the dots on the plot should spread close to or around the straight

diagonal line.

From Figure 4.3, it shows that the data is normally distributed as the line on

histogram depicts in form of bell shape. Moreover, in the Figure 4.4, the dots

lining along the diagonal line from bottom left to upper right and the dots spread

close to the line. Both figures show that the data is normally distributed and fulfill

the criteria or requirement of normality test.

4.2.7. Heterokedasticity Test

The purpose of heteroskedasticity is to know whether the data is normal

distribution or not and whether variance terms of errors are difference across

observations. The heteroskedasticity test can be seen from residual plot. To pass

the heterokedasticity test, the distribution of residual value toward predicted value

must be spread randomly without making a specific pattern (example: sinus

pattern, decreasing-then-increasing pattern).

Figure 4.5 Scatterplot

59

The picture above shows that the scatterplot dots spread randomly without making

any particular pattern. It means that there is no heterokedasticity and the

requirement of no heterokedasticity is fulfilled.

4.2.8. Multicollinearity Test

The purpose of multicollinearity test is to show whether there is a strong

correlation between independent variables. Multicollinearity is considered high if

the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) value is larger than 10. It means that there is a

strong correlation between independent variables and one of the variables should

be discard from multiple regression model.

Table 4.5 Multicollinearity Result

Variable VIF

Brand Loyalty 2.644

Brand Awareness 3.232

Brand Association 1.900

Source: Primary Data SPSS 16.0

From the table above, it shows that the requirement of no multicollinearity is

fulfilled because all independent variables (brand loyalty, brand awareness, and

brand association) have VIF value less than 10. Thus, no need to discard these

variables and these can be included in multiple regression model.

4.2.9. F Test

F test is used to know whether there is a significant relationship between

dependent and independent variable.

60

Table 4.6 ANOVA

The requirement value of significance that has to be achieved in this test is less

than 0.05. In the ANOVA table above, it shows that the significance value is

0.000, less than 0.05. This result shows that all independent variables which are

brand loyalty, brand awareness, and brand association has a significant influence

toward consumer buying decision. Therefore, in this research, researcher accepts

the Ha and rejects the H0.

4.2.10. T Test

T test is a test with purpose to determine the relationship of each independent

variable toward dependent variable.

Table 4.7 Coefficients

The table above shows the result of significance value of each independent

variable to consumer buying decision as dependent variable:

61

1. Brand loyalty has significance value of 0.01 which is less than 0.05. It

means that brand loyalty is significance and has influence toward Mizone

consumer buying decision.

2. Brand awareness has significance value of 0.03 which is less than 0.05. It

means that brand awareness is significance and has influence toward

Mizone consumer buying decision.

3. Brand association has significance value of 0.00 which is less than 0.05. It

means that brand association is significance and has influence toward

Mizone consumer buying decision

4. Overall, all independent variables (brand loyalty, brand awareness, and

brand association) significant to consumer buying decision, so researcher

rejects H0 and accepts Ha.

As for beta of standardized coefficients, it shows that brand association has the

biggest result (0.624), followed by brand loyalty (0.174), and the last is brand

awareness (0.154). Brand association magnitude is 3.45 times bigger than brand

loyalty and 3.76 bigger than brand awareness. It means that it is recommended to

fix or increase and focus on brand association first rather than other aspects

because it has the highest magnitude. Researcher uses beta to explain the result of

the sample.

4.2.11. Multiple Regression Model

This measurement is used to examine whether the model is able to help predict the

consumer buying decision of Mizone based on brand equity aspects (brand

loyalty, brand awareness, and brand association).

62

Table 4.8 Model Summary

In the table above, the value of R is the coefficient of correlation. The guidance of

correlation coefficient based on Sugiyono (2009) is:

Table 4.9 R Value

R Value Correlation

0.00 – 0.199 Very Low

0.2 – 0.399 Low

0.4 – 0.599 Medium

0.6 – 0.799 Strong

0.8 – 1.000 Very Strong

Source: Metode Penelitian Bisnis (Sugiyono, 2009)

The R value is 0.905 which means there is very strong correlation between

independent variables and dependent variable. Moreover, the value of adjusted R

square shows how large independent variables affect dependent variable. The

adjusted R square in the table above is 0.814, means that the contribution of

independent variables to dependent variable simultaneously is quite high, which is

81.4%. In short, brand loyalty, brand awareness, and brand association affect only

81.4% on Mizone consumer buying behavior. The rest 18.6% is explained and

contributed by another factor or variable which not discussed in this research.

Researcher uses multiple regression because there is more than one independent

variables that are used for this study. From the test before, it shows that all

independent variables are significant (see table below):

63

Table 4.10 Significance and Beta Coefficients

Independent

Variable

Sig. Value Pass Beta

Brand Loyalty 0.01 Significance 0.174

Brand Awareness 0.03 Significance 0.154

Brand Association 0.00 Significance 0.624

Source: Primary Data SPSS 16.0

Thus, the multiple regression model for this study is:

Y = 0.177 + 0.174 X1 + 0.154 X2 + 0.624 X3 + ε

Where:

Y = Consumer Buying Decision

X1 = Brand Loyalty

X2 = Brand Awareness

X3 = Brand Association

ε = Random Error Term

4.3. Interpretation Result

Based on statistical test for this study by using SPSS 16.0, it is shown that

“consumer buying decision” variable can be explained by “brand loyalty”

variable, “brand awareness” variable, and “brand association” variable. Other

result findings are:

1. According to T test and F test result, variable brand loyalty, brand

awareness, and brand association has influence and significant toward

Mizone consumer buying behavior. All significance result of brand

loyalty, brand awareness, and brand association are below 0.05, means that

all independent variable of brand equity that the researcher uses has impact

64

to President University students buying decision of Mizone. Based on

previous research (refer to table 2.2), it shows that brand loyalty, brand

awareness, and brand association do have impact or influence consumer

buying decision. Therefore, it shows that President University students

realize and consider that brand equity aspect have impact on them that

makes them buy the product.

2. The independent variable that affect Mizone consumer buying decision the

most is brand association. It can be seen from beta of standardized

coefficient, in which brand association has the highest beta (0.643)

compared to brand loyalty (0.186) and brand awareness (0.171). Based on

statement above, researcher tries to relate it with the questionnaire result

which is about brand loyalty, brand awareness, brand association, and

President University buying decision of Mizone isotonic drink. It shows

that President University student buy Mizone because the price is worth

with the quality and it can replace their body fluid. Moreover, Mizone has

several flavors that consumer can choose based on their taste preferences.

3. As for brand awareness and brand association, President University

students can recognize Mizone brand and there is no difficulties in

imagining the brand. Moreover, they also aware about the brand and they

buy it because it is a familiar and well-known brand. Based on President

University students, Mizone has a unique brand compared to other brand

and some think that Mizone is a right product that is consumed by people

who care about healthiness.

To conclude, there is a significant influence between aspects of brand equity,

especially brand loyalty, brand awareness, and brand association toward buying

behavior of President University students to the product Mizone. The influence of

these brand equity aspects make people to buy the product because they know,

aware, and like the brand.

65

CHAPTER V

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

5.1. Conclusion

The objective to be identified in this study is the influence of brand loyalty, brand

awareness, and brand association toward Mizone consumer buying decision.

Based on the results of data analysis, the researcher concludes as follows:

1. According to F test result, it shows that brand loyalty has significance

influence toward Mizone consumer buying decision. It can be proven

based on the ANOVA table (Table 4.6) that the significance of F is 0.00

and it’s lower than 0.05. Moreover, based on T test result, it shows that the

significance value of brand loyalty is 0.01, which is lower than 0.05 means

it is accepted. Moreover, from the primary data (questionnaire), it shows

that President University students still buy Mizone although their friends

or family suggest that it’s not good and they will choose Mizone to replace

their body fluid.

2. Brand awareness has significance influence toward Mizone consumer

buying decision. It can be seen from F test result, the significance of F is

0.00 and it’s lower than 0.05. Moreover, based on T test result, it shows

that the significance value of brand awareness is 0.03, which is lower than

0.05 means it is accepted. As from the primary data (questionnaire), it

shows that President University students aware of this brand. They buy

Mizone because it is a familiar brand and they can recognize Mizone

among other competitors’ brand.

66

3. Based on both F test and T test result, it shows that brand association has

significance influence toward Mizone consumer buying decision. It can be

proven based on the ANOVA table (Table 4.6) that the significance of F is

0.00 and it’s lower than 0.05. In the other hand, T test result shows that the

significance value of brand association is 0.00, which is lower than 0.05

means it is accepted. Moreover, from the primary data (questionnaire), it

shows that President University students have association with Mizone

brand. They think Mizone is a unique brand of isotonic drink product and

they also like Mizone brand image.

4. In short, all independent variables (brand loyalty, brand awareness, and

brand association) have influence toward Mizone consumer buying

decision. This result is supported by previous research done by Kusuma

(2012) and Yusuf (2010) that brand equity aspects, namely: brand loyalty,

brand awareness, and brand association have significant influence toward

consumer buying decision of isotonic drink product.

5.2. Recommendation

Based on the data analysis of this study, the researcher would like to contribute by

providing recommendations for the following parties:

1. For PT. Tirta Investama (Mizone):

Research indicated that among aspects of brand equity that the researcher

used for this research (brand loyalty, brand awareness, and brand

association), brand association is the most influencing toward consumer

buying decision. Therefore, the company can make advertising or event

for consumers with specific theme to create stimuli in the mind of

consumer for deeper and clear association.

67

2. For future researchers:

As for future researchers who have similar interest in brand equity analysis

of FMCG product, the researcher suggest to delve further into the brand

loyalty and brand awareness aspect, as well as other brand equity aspect

that the researcher doesn’t use for this study which is perceived quality and

other proprietary asset. Therefore, it might lead to better way of

understanding the consumer buying decision based on all aspect of brand

equity.

68

REFERENCES

Books:

Barry Render, Ralph M. Stair, Michael E. Hanna, T.N. Badri. (2008). Quantitative

Analysis for Management 10th edition. Pearson Education.

Berenson, Levine, Timothy. (2011). Basic Business Statistics: Concept and

Applications. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Darmadi Durianto, Sugiarto, Tony Sitinjak. (2011). Strategi Menaklukkan Pasar

Melalui Riset Ekuitas dan Perilaku Merek. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Durianto. (2004). Brand Equity Ten: Strategi Memimpin Pasar.

Ghozali, I. (2011). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program SPSS.

Keller, K. L. (2012). Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and

Managing Brand Equity, 4th Edition. Prentice Hall.

Kendall, S. D. Customer Service from the Customer's Perspective. John Wiley &

Sons.

Kotler, P. (2005). Faqs On Marketing. Singapore: Marshal Cavendish Business.

Leon G. Schiffman, Leslie Lazar Kanuk. (2009). Consumer Behavior 10th

Edition. Prentice Hall.

Malhotra, N. K. (2010). marketing Research An Applied Orientation 6th Edition.

New Jersey: Pearson Education.

Norman K. Denzin, Yvonna S. Lincoln. (2011). The SAGE Handbook of

Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications, Inc.

Philip Kotler, Gary Armstrong. (2012). Principe of Marketing 14th Edition.

Pearson Education Limited.

69

Philip Kotler, Kevin Lane Keller. (2009). Marketing Management 13th Edition.

Pearson Prentice Hall.

Rangkuti, F. (2004). The Power of Brand. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Sekaran, U. (2003). Research Methods For Business: A Skill Building Approach

4th Edition. John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Shimp, T. A. (2010). Advertising, Promotion, and Other Aspects of Integrated

Marketing Communication. Cengage Learning.

Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif,

Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Temporal, P. (2010). Advanced Brand Management. Singapore: John Wiley &

Sons.

Journal:

Ioan, M. O. AN ANALYSIS OF THE BRAND LOYALTY BASED CONSUMER

TYPOLOGY. Romania.

Management, E. I. (2009). Retrieved January 10, 2014, from

http://www.eurib.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Documenten/PDF/Merkmeer

waarde_ENGELS/s_-_Brand_equity_model_by_Aaker_EN_.pdf

Marketing, T. C. (2009). Retrieved January 10, 2014, from Marketing and the 7

P's: http://www.cim.co.uk/files/7ps.pdf

Mohamad Taleghani, Meysam Almasi . (2011). Evaluate the Factors Affecting

Brand Equity from the Perspective of Customers Using Aaker's Model.

Iran.

Moisescu, O. I. A Conceptual Analysis of Brand Loyalty As Core Dimension of

70

Brand Equity.

Namin Tajzadeh, Rahmani Vahid. (2012). The Role of Attitudes and Decision

Making on Product Choice: Case Study: Cellular Phones. International

Business Research , 132-146.

P. K. A. Ladipo, T. O. Olufayo, Omoera, C. I. (2012). The Multi-Dimensional

Application/Use of Branding in the Universe of Marketers. International

Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences , 8.

Wahyu, D. (2012). Pengaruh kesadaran merek, asosiasi merek, dan loyalitas

merek terhadap keputusan pembelian handphone blackberry.

Zen, D. K. (2012, September 3). Analisis Pengaruh Ekuitas Merek Terhadap

Keputusan Pembelian Konsumen Minuman Isotonik Pocari Sweat. 102.

Website:

Association, A. M. (2004, October). Definition of Marketing. Retrieved January

10, 2014, from American Marketing Association:

http://www.marketingpower.com/AboutAMA/Pages/DefinitionofMarketin

g.aspx

Basyuni, M. M. (2001, August 1). Retrieved January 10, 2014, from UNDANG-

UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA TENTANG MEREK:

http://www.dgip.go.id/images/adelch-images/pdf-

files/uu_pp/uu_no_15_th_2001.pdf

Chieng Fayrene Y.L., Goi Chai Lee. (2011, January). Retrieved January 10, 2014,

from CUSTOMER-BASED BRAND EQUITY: A LITERATURE

REVIEW : http://www.researchersworld.com/vol2/PAPER_04.pdf

Group, F. C. (2013). Top Brand Survey. Retrieved November 3, 2013, from Top

Brand: http://www.topbrand-award.com/top-brand-survey/survey-

result/top-brand-index-2013/

71

Lanthier, E. (2002, March 29). Retrieved December 10, 2013, from

Questionnaire:

http://www.nvcc.edu/home/elanthier/methods/questionnaire.htm

Nancy Giddens, Amanda Hofmann, Connie Hardy. (2010, August). Brand

Loyalty. Retrieved January 10, 2014, from Ag Decision Maker:

http://www.extension.iastate.edu/agdm/wholefarm/pdf/c5-54.pdf

Roa, D. V. (2013, February 22). No Water, No Business: The Importance of Water

Stewardship. Retrieved November 20, 2013, from Blue Tech Research:

http://www.bluetechresearch.com/no-water-no-business-the-importance-

of-water-stewardship/

University, D. (2013, July). Water - a vital nutrient. Retrieved November 20,

2013, from Better Health Channel:

http://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/bhcv2/bhcarticles.nsf/pages/Water_a_v

ital_nutrient

72

APPENDICES

73

APPENDIX I

Questionnaire

Responden Yth.

Nama saya Felicia, mahasiswi semester akhir jurusan Marketing dari President

University yang sedang melakukan penelitian tentang "Pengaruh dari loyalitas

merek, kesadaran merek, dan asosiasi merek terhadap keputusan pembelian

konsumen akan produk Mizone" (The influence between brand loyalty, brand

awareness, and brand association toward consumer buying decision of Mizone).

Saya mengharapkan kerjasama responden dalam penelitian ini sehingga penelitian

ini dapat berlangsung dengan baik. Semua informasi yang saya terima dari hasil

kuesioner ini bersifat rahasia dan untuk kepentingan akademis. Atas perhatian dan

kerjasamanya, saya ucapkan terima kasih.

Felicia

Gender:

Male

Female

Statement:

1: Strongly Disagree

2: Disagree

3: Neutral

4: Agree

74

5: Strongly Agree

No Statements 1 2 3 4 5

BRAND LOYALTY

1. I still buy Mizone although my friends or

family suggest its not good

2. Mizone is my 1st choice when I buy isotonic

drink

3. I buy Mizone regularly

4. I always buy Mizone instead of other brand

because the price is worth with its quality

5. If I want to replace my lost body fluid, I'll

choose Mizone

BRAND AWARENESS

6. When I want isotonic drink, I think about

Mizone automatically

7. I buy Mizone because it is familiar & well-

known brand

8. Some characteristic of Mizone come to my

mind quickly

9. I can recognize Mizone among competing

brands

10. I have difficulty imagining Mizone in my

mind

BRAND ASSOCIATION

75

11. Mizone has a unique brand image compare to

competing brands

12. Mizone is consumed by people who care

about healthiness

13. I respect and admire people who drink

Mizone

14. I like the brand image of Mizone

15. I believe and trust the Mizone brand

CONSUMER BUYING DECISION

16. I buy Mizone to fulfill my need of isotonic

product

17. I buy Mizone after I see the advertising

through TV, internet, magazine, or billboard

18. Before I buy Mizone, I search for information

about the product first

19. I always compare Mizone with other isotonic

drink brand

20. I will buy Mizone rather than other isotonic

drink brand

21. I will purchase Mizone again if I am out of

stock

22. I recommend Mizone to other people

76

APPENDIX II

Raw Data Material

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

1 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 4 2 2 4 2 3 3 1 3 4 3 3 4

2 4 4 4 4 5 4 5 4 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5

3 3 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 4 3 4 4 3 3 2 4 2 1 3 3 3 2

4 3 4 5 4 4 1 2 5 5 4 4 4 4 3 2 3 1 4 2 4 5 4

5 4 4 3 4 4 2 2 3 4 4 3 4 3 3 2 3 2 3 3 4 5 4

6 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4

7 5 5 5 5 5 1 3 3 5 5 1 3 3 3 3 1 1 5 1 5 5 5

8 3 2 1 3 2 1 1 4 2 4 3 4 4 5 3 3 2 3 2 2 3 3

9 3 4 3 4 4 2 2 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 4 2 2 5 5 5 5

10 3 3 4 3 3 1 2 4 2 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 2 4 2 3 3 2

11 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 5 2 4 2 4 4 3 4 2 2 5 3 3 5 4

12 5 4 3 4 4 3 3 3 4 5 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 5 3 4 5 4

13 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

14 3 3 2 3 3 2 2 4 3 4 3 3 5 3 4 2 1 5 2 2 5 3

15 3 4 5 2 4 2 3 3 3 4 5 5 4 4 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 4

16 5 5 5 5 5 3 3 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 3 5 5 5 5 5

17 3 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 4 4 2 2 3 4

18 2 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 4 2 3 4 3 3 3 1 4 2 2 3 3

19 5 5 4 4 4 3 4 4 5 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 3 5 3 4 4 4

20 5 5 4 5 5 3 3 4 5 4 1 3 4 5 3 3 1 2 2 5 4 2

21 5 4 4 3 3 4 5 4 5 4 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 4 3 4 5 4

22 4 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 4 3 3 3 4 3 2 3 2 5 3 3 3 3

23 5 4 3 4 4 3 4 3 5 4 4 3 4 2 3 3 4 5 3 4 5 4

24 5 5 5 5 5 3 3 4 5 3 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 4 3 4 5 5

25 4 5 4 5 4 2 2 4 4 2 4 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 3 4 4 4

26 4 4 2 3 5 1 2 2 2 5 2 2 4 2 2 3 2 2 3 5 5 2

27 4 4 3 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 5 5 3 5 5 5 5

28 5 5 3 5 5 1 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 4 4 5 5 5

29 5 4 4 4 4 2 3 4 5 5 4 4 5 3 2 4 2 5 3 5 5 4

30 3 4 3 4 5 2 4 4 5 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 5 4 5 3 3

31 5 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 1 5 5 4 5 5 3 5 5 5 5 4

32 5 5 5 5 2 5 5 5 5 5 1 4 5 2 2 2 2 4 2 5 5 5

33 4 3 3 5 2 1 2 2 2 5 3 5 5 5 3 4 3 5 3 5 4 4

34 5 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 4 3 4 4 3

35 5 4 3 4 4 2 2 4 4 4 3 4 5 3 4 3 3 5 3 3 4 4

36 4 4 3 4 4 2 2 4 4 4 2 4 4 4 4 4 2 4 3 4 4 3

37 5 5 5 5 5 3 4 5 5 5 5 5 3 3 5 5 5 3 3 5 5 3

38 3 1 4 3 1 1 4 3 3 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 3 2 3 1 4 2

77

39 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

40 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 3 4 4 4 4 4

41 4 4 2 4 3 2 3 4 4 5 3 3 3 3 4 4 2 4 2 4 3 3

42 5 5 5 5 5 4 3 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 5 5 3 4 4 4 4 4

43 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

44 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

45 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1

46 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 5

47 4 5 5 4 4 2 4 4 4 1 3 4 4 3 4 4 4 1 4 4 4 4

48 5 3 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

49 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 4 4 3

50 5 2 3 4 4 1 1 2 4 4 3 2 3 2 2 3 1 5 3 3 3 2

51 4 3 3 3 3 2 3 2 4 3 3 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 4

52 4 4 3 4 5 2 2 3 3 5 3 3 5 3 2 4 2 4 3 4 3 4

53 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 5 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4

54 3 2 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 4 5

55 3 2 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 4 5

56 4 3 4 5 3 2 4 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 3

57 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 4 4 5 5 4 3 3 4 4 5 5 5

58 4 2 3 4 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4

59 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 4

60 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

61 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 5 5 5 5 5

62 5 5 5 5 5 3 5 5 4 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

63 3 2 3 3 4 1 3 4 4 5 3 3 3 3 4 3 2 4 3 2 4 3

64 5 4 4 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 3 5 4 5 4 3 3 5 5 5

65 5 5 3 5 5 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

66 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 5 5 5 5

67 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 3 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

68 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5

69 5 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 5 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 5 5 4

70 5 5 5 5 5 3 3 5 5 5 2 5 5 4 5 4 4 5 4 5 5 5

71 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 2

72 5 4 5 5 5 5 2 1 5 3 4 3 5 4 5 4 5 5 4 4 4 3

73 5 5 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 2 3 3 3

74 2 3 3 4 3 1 2 4 3 4 3 3 5 2 4 2 5 5 2 3 2 3

75 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 4 4 3 3 4 3 4 3 4 1 5 3 4 4 3

76 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 1 3 2 3 2

77 5 3 4 4 3 1 2 3 4 4 2 2 3 3 3 4 1 4 3 4 3 5

78 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 5 5

79 4 4 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 4 2 1 2 2 4 2 4 2 4

80 4 3 4 4 3 2 2 2 4 2 2 4 3 4 4 3 2 4 2 4 4 3

81 3 4 4 3 3 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 2 4 3 2 4 3 4 4 3

82 4 2 3 4 5 2 3 2 5 4 5 5 5 3 5 5 3 1 3 5 5 5

83 4 4 3 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 4 3 4 4 4

84 3 3 3 4 4 2 3 4 4 3 4 4 3 3 3 4 3 4 3 4 3 3

85 3 4 2 2 3 2 4 3 4 3 2 3 3 2 4 2 3 4 3 4 4 3

86 4 4 3 3 3 1 3 3 3 3 1 2 3 1 3 1 1 2 3 4 3 3

87 2 4 1 2 2 1 1 4 2 2 2 2 3 2 3 1 1 5 1 1 5 1

78

88 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 5 3 5 5 3 5 5 5 5 3

89 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 4 3 5 3 3 3 3 4 3 4 3 2 2 3 2

90 5 5 3 5 5 3 4 3 4 3 5 4 3 4 3 4 3 5 4 3 4 4

91 5 5 5 5 5 3 5 5 5 5 3 3 5 5 3 5 2 3 5 5 5 3

92 4 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 2 3 3 2

93 5 4 2 4 4 2 2 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 4 4 2 4 3 4 4 4

94 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 4 4 4 5 4 2 3 5 4 4 5

95 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4

96 5 3 2 4 5 2 2 4 4 5 4 5 5 5 4 4 2 4 3 4 5 4

97 5 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5

98 5 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 5 3 4 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4

99 2 4 3 3 3 1 3 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 3 1

100 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3

79

APPENDIX III

Reliability Test

Brand Loyalty (X1):

Brand Awareness (X2):

Brand Association (X3):

80

Consumer Buying Decision (Y):

Validity Test

81

Correlation Test

Multiple Regression

82

83