the influence of electronic word-of-mouth through...
TRANSCRIPT
THE INFLUENCE OF ELECTRONIC WORD-OF-MOUTH THROUGH
SOCIAL MEDIA FACEBOOK AND ELECTRONIC SERVICE QUALITY
TOWARDS PURCHASE INTENTION
(Case Study of Xiaomi Smart Phone Buyer in MiForum)
By:
Imanina Almas
NIM: 1111081200009
DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT
INTERNATIONAL CLASS PROGRAM
FACULTY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS
SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY
JAKART
1438 H / 2016
i
ii
iii
iv
v
CURRICULUM VITAE
PERSONAL DATA
Name : Imanina Almas
Place/Date of Birth : Jakarta, October 28th
1992
Address : Pulogebang Permai blok G8/5 Cakung Jakarta Timur
Religion : Moslem
Sex : Female
Marital Status : Single
E-mail : [email protected]
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
2013-2015 : Universiti Utara Malaysia
Bachelor of International Business Management
(Hons.) (CGPA: 3.31)
(Double Degree Program)
2011-2013 : Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
Bachelor of Economics (CGPA: 3.58)
(Double Degree Program)
2008-2011 : Madrasah Aliyah Al-Zaytun Islamic Boarding School
Indramayu, Jawa Barat
2005-2008 : Madrasah Tsanawiyah Al-Zaytun Islamic Boarding School
Indramayu, Jawa Barat
1999-2005 : Sekolah Dasar Islam AL-Azhar 19 Sentra Primer Jakarta Timur
vi
SKILL PROFICIENCY
Language Skill
English Competent in Speaking and Writing
Indonesian Competent in Speaking and Writing
Computer User Skill
Internet User Skill
Windows PC User Skill
Microsoft Windows Application (Microsoft Word, PowerPoint, Excel)
ACHIEVEMENTS
Dean Award receiver of 3rd
semester in Universiti Utara Malaysia (GPA:
3.72)
WORKING EXPERIENCE
PT. Century Batteries Indonesia Internship February - May 2015
Kompas Gramedia Freelancer January - July 2016
AFFILIATION
General Secretary in Public Relation Division (2009-2010)
Leader of English First Club (2010)
Member of International Student Society, UUM (2013-2015)
AIESEC Language Class Global Fiesta (March, 2014)
vii
ABSTRACT
This research aims to analyze the influence of electronic word-of-mouth
and electronic service quality towards purchase intention, case study of Xiaomi
smartphone user in MiForum. This research is a quantitative research which uses
convenience sampling. The data obtained in this research is primary data taken
from electronic questionnaires. This research uses 100 respondents and the overall
respondents obligate to own Facebook account and they are Xiaomi smartphone
users who has been bought Xiaomi‟ product through its online website. Data
analysis technique in this research is multiple linier regression by using SPSS
version 20.0.
The results of this research shows electronic word-of-mouth and electronic
service quality variable partially and simultaneously have significant influence
towards purchase intention.
Keywords: electronic word-of-mouth, electronic service quality,
purchaseintention, Xiaomi.
viii
ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh electronic word-of-
mouth dan electronic service quality terhadap minat beli smartphone Xiaomi.
Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian kuantitatif. Data yang digunakan dalam
penelitian adalah data primer yang diperoleh melalui penyebaran elektronik
kuesioner. Metode convenience sampling telah dipilih untuk memperoleh data
dalam penelitian ini. Penelitian ini menggunakan 100 responden dan keseluruhan
responden merupakan pengguna sosial media Facebook dan pengguna
smartphone Xiaomi yang telah berbelanja produk Xiaomi secara online atau
melalui website resmi Xiaomi. Pengukuran dalam penelitian ini menggunakan
analisis regresi linier berganda dengan menggunakan program komputer SPSS
versi 20.0.
Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa variabel electronic word-of-mouth dan
electronic service quality secara parsial dan simultan berpengaruh terhadap niat
beli konsumen.
Kata kunci: electronic word-of-mouth, electronic service quality, purchase
intention, Xiaomi.
ix
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Assalammu'alaikum Warahmatuulahi Wabarakaatuh
Praise be to Allah SWT, the most merciful, the most beneficient. The
creator of this beautiful universe. The supreme power that has no comparison. The
only and only the mighty. Shalawat and Salaam always gives to the Prophet
Muhammad SAW, his family, and his sahabaah who has brought us from the
darkness to the lightness.
With the strength, intelligence, patience, and strong desire from Allah
SWT, finally I am able to accomplishing this research to obtain my second title,
bachelor degree in economics. I believe there are “invisible hands” which have
helped me going through this process. In the process of preparation of this thesis,
the author realized that this thesis is far from perfect. But with effort, prayer, and
also support given by the people closest to me, Alhamdulillah I can finish this
thesis.
My warmest thanks goes to my mom, Lina Prihatini, SE. who always
encourage me to believe that I am capable of doing anything I want and to stay
humble on what I am capable of. Thank you for taking care of me since I was a
kid until today, remind me to pray, being a reminder for me, always advising me,
teaching me how to be patient, and everything I could not mention one by one.
Because my gratitude for what you have done in my life would not enough to be
written on a piece of paper.
I also would like to say my gratitude to my father, Ir. Endang Subarman,
SE.,MM, who has always looked out for my future and for being someone who I
can talk to about all economics matters that I have learnt in college. Thanks dad
who has been taught me how to be a good muslimah, to be good at math, to be a
good daughter for him, and almost everything I need to know about life. Thank
x
you for working so hard to support your family, and to support your children‟
education. Thank you dad, for everything.
I believe I am nothing without each one of you who has helped me in
finishing this undergraduate thesis. Thus, in this very special moment, let me say
many thanks to all of them who have been helping me the process of this thesis,
including:
1. Dr. M. Arief Mufraini, Lc, M.Si as Dean of Faculty of Economics and Business
UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
2. Dr. Muniaty Aisyah, Ir.,MM as my first supervisor. Thank you very much for the
continous support, for the patience, motivation, and immense knowledge. Her
guidance helped me in all the time of research and writing of this thesis
3. Mr. Ade Suherlan, MM.,MBA as my second supervisor. Thank you very much for
guiding me until finished this thesis. Thank you for your knowledge, advice, and
recommendations
4. All Lecturers of UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta who have taught me patiently,
may what they have given are recorded by Allah SWT
5. All academic staff FEB UIN Jakarta, who have worked well to serve all the
students
6. My best friends, Anugerah Eka Febriyanti, S.Si, Firda Ajeng Amalia, S.P, Fathi
Mulki Robbani, S.Kom.i, Fitri Midyani, S.Psi, Sarah Maria Ulfa, S.Pd, Dwi Puspa
Khairunnisa who soon to be S.Ag. Thanks for being my shoulder to lean on for
almost 6years. I probably nothing without you. You guys are such an awesome
best friends!
7. For my UIN friends and classmates, Pramayassya Amero, Fahdzian Ghassandy
Merzadi, Rendy Aditya Yusantri, Fahrur Rozi, Maulidan Spetiawan, Muhammad
Iqbal Almaududi, Prispayana Vidro Amero, Uji Abu Tholib, Ratu Balgis Mustafa,
Siti Fatimah Zuhra, Nadiah Intan Sahara, big thanks for all awesome moments
that we have shared together. And special thanks for special “you” who has been
give a special time and advice for me during the accomplishing of this mini thesis.
Thank you for show me the bitter and sweetness of life. Thanks for teach me how
xi
to be a tough girl. And thanks for teach me how to accept what has been destined
by God.
I realize this undergraduate thesis is still far from perfection, thus
suggestions and constructive criticism from all parties are welcome, in order to
improve my thesis. Finally, only Allah SWT will return your kindness and I hope
this thesis will be useful to all parties, especially for writers and readers in
general, may Allah bless us and recorded as the worship of Allah‟s hand. Aamiin.
Wassalammualaikum Warahmatulah Wabarakaatuh
Jakarta, September 24th
2016
Imanina Almas
xii
LIST OF CONTENT
Description Page
ACCEPTANCE LETTER ............................................................................... i
CERTIFICATION OF THESIS EXAM ......................................................... ii
CERTIFICATION OF COMPREHENSIVES EXAMS ................................. iii
SHEET STATEMENT AUTHENTICITY SCIENTIFIC WORKS ................ iv
CURRICULUM VITAE ................................................................................. v
ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................... vii
ABSTRAK ...................................................................................................... viii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................ ix
LIST OF CONTENT ...................................................................................... xii
LIST OF TABLE ............................................................................................ xvii
LIST OF FIGURE ........................................................................................... xx
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION
A. Background of the Study ............................................... 1
B. Problem Formulation ..................................................... 15
C. Research Objectives ....................................................... 15
D. Research Benefits .......................................................... 16
CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW
A. Theory Development ..................................................... 17
1. Internet Retailing .................................................... 17
2. Social Media Marketing ......................................... 18
3. Consumer Behaviour .............................................. 19
xiii
4. Word-of-Mouth Communication ........................... 21
5. Traditional vs Electronic Word-of-Mouth ............. 23
6. Traditional Word-of-Mouth ................................... 25
7. Electronic Word-of-Mouth (e-WOM) ................... 25
a) Quality of e-WOM ........................................... 28
b) Quantity of e-WOM ......................................... 29
c) Sender‟ Expertise ............................................. 30
8. Service Quality ....................................................... 31
9. Electronic Service Quality ..................................... 34
10. Electronic Service Quality Dimensions ................. 36
a) Reliability ......................................................... 37
b) Website Design ................................................ 38
c) Security ............................................................ 39
d) Empathy ........................................................... 40
e) Responsiveness ................................................ 40
11. Purchase Intention .................................................. 41
12. Theory Reasoned Action ........................................ 44
B. Previous Research .......................................................... 47
C. Logical Framework ........................................................ 50
D. Hypothesis ..................................................................... 51
CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
A. Scope of Research .......................................................... 53
B. Sampling Method ........................................................... 53
xiv
1. Population ................................................................ 53
2. Sample ..................................................................... 54
C. Data Collection Method ................................................. 56
1. Primary Data ........................................................... 52
2. Secondary Data ........................................................ 58
D. Analysis Data Method ................................................... 58
1. Data Quality Test ..................................................... 59
a) Validity Test ...................................................... 59
b) Reliability Test .................................................. 60
2. Classic Assumption Test .......................................... 60
a) Normality Test ................................................... 60
b) Multicollinearity Test ........................................ 63
c) Heteroscedasticity Test ...................................... 64
3. Multiple Linear Regression ..................................... 65
4. The Coefficient of determination Test (R ) ............. 66
5. Theoritical Hypothesis Test ..................................... 67
a) T-test (Partial Test) ............................................ 67
b) F-Test (Simultaneous Test) ................................ 68
E. Research Operational Variable ...................................... 70
CHAPTER IV ANALYSIS
A. General Overview .......................................................... 73
B. Xiami Logo .................................................................... 74
C. Xiaomi Mission Statement ............................................. 74
xv
D. Xiaomi Product .............................................................. 75
E. Xiaomi Business Strategy .............................................. 76
F. Xiaomi Pricing Strategy ................................................. 77
G. Analysis and Discussion ................................................ 79
1. Validity Test Result ................................................. 79
2. Reliability Test Result ............................................. 82
H. Descriptive Analysis of Respondent Answer ................ 77
1. Total of Respondents based on Gender .................. 77
2. Total of Respondents based on Age ....................... 78
3. Electronic word-of-mouth Description .................... 78
4. Electronic Service Quality Description ................... 86
I. Classic Assumption Test ................................................ 108
1. Normality Test ......................................................... 108
2. Multicolinearity Test ................................................ 111
3. Heteroscedasticity Test ............................................ 113
J. Multiple Linier Regression Analysis ............................. 114
K. Coefficient of Determination (Adjusted R2) ................. 115
L. Hypothesis Test .............................................................. 117
1. T-Test ....................................................................... 117
2. F-Test ....................................................................... 118
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
A. Conclusion ..................................................................... 122
B. Recommendation ........................................................... 123
xvi
1. For Company .......................................................... 123
2. For Future Researcher .............................................. 128
REFERENCES ............................................................................................. 129
APPENDIX ............................................................................................. 135
xvii
LIST OF TABLE
No. Description Page
1.1 Top Five Smartphone Vendors 8
2.1 Previous Research 47
3.1 Likert Scale 52
3.2 Operational Variable 71
4.1 Validity Test Result 81
4.2 Reliability Test Result 82
4.3 Total of Respondents Based on Gender 83
4.4 Total of Respondents Based on Age 84
4.5 Question 1 85
4.6 Question 2 85
4.7 Question 3 86
4.8 Question 4 87
4.9 Question 5 87
4.10 Question 6 88
4.11 Question 7 88
4.12 Question 8 89
4.13 Question 9 89
4.14 Question 10 90
4.15 Question 11 91
4.16 Question 12 91
xviii
4.17 Question 13 92
4.18 Question 14 93
4.19 Question 15 93
4.20 Question 16 94
4.21 Question 17 94
4.22 Question 18 95
4.23 Question 19 96
4.24 Question 20 96
4.25 Question 21 97
4.26 Question 22 98
4.27 Question 23 98
4.28 Question 24 99
4.29 Question 25 99
4.30 Question 26 100
4.31 Question 27 100
4.32 Question 28 101
4.33 Question 29 101
4.34 Question 30 102
4.35 Question 31 102
4.36 Question 32 103
4.37 Question 33 104
4.38 Question 34 105
4.39 Question 35 105
xix
4.40 Question 36 106
4.41 Question 37 107
4.42 One-Sampel Kolmogrov-Smirnov Test 111
4.43 Multicollinearity Test 112
4.44 Multiple Linier Regression 114
4.45 Coefficient of Determination (Adjusted R2) 116
4.46 The Result of T-Test 117
4.47 The Result of F-Test 119
xx
LIST OF FIGURE
No Description Page
1.1 Indonesian Internet User 1
1.2 Number of Active Account in Social Media 5
1.3 Xiaomi Market Share 11
2.1 Differences between offline WOM and online WOM 23
2.2 Stages between Evaluation of Alternatives and Purchase Decision 42
2.3 Logical Framework 50
4.1 Xiaomi Logo 74
4.2 P-Plot Normal Curve 109
4.3 Histogram -Dependent Variable: Purchase Intention 110
4.4 Graph of Heteroscedasticity 113
1
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
A. Background of the Study
Since it was first discovered, the Internet currently still growing
rapidly with the current estimation of 3,174 billion of Internet users
worldwide in 2015 (Statista team, 2015). Whereas, in Indoesia itself in
2015 as much as 93.4 million of people reported were accessing the
internet. This figure is projected to grow to 133.5 million in 2018. With
these numbers, Indonesia is one of the biggest online markets worldwide
(Statista team, 2016). A worldwide survey showed that 77% of Indonesian
youth aged between 13 and 24 years old liked to be connected to the
internet wherever they are (Statista team, 2016).
Figure 1.1
Source: www.statista.com, 2016
83.7 93.4
102.8 112.6
123 133.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Indonesian Internet Users
in million
2
As the world has become more interconnected, the internet has
become an essential tool in todays business environment. The continuous
rapid growth of online retailing (23% increases in 20015 to $1.700 billion
over $1,471 billion in 2014) implies that e-commerce has become a
common medium for businesses to generate revenue (Statista team 2015).
In the past, during the industry era- when the core of the
technology is only about machinery of industry, marketing is about how to
sell the company's products to the customer. The marketing managers of
the company tend to just consider on how their company can design the
productivity process to meet mass production and to fulfill the mass
demand. By doing so, the company then able to attract more and more
consumers because the price offered is really affordable. But this time,
marketing is no longer as simple as that. Todays consumers are very easy
to obtain information and compare several offers of similar products. The
value of a product is also determined by the consumer, and preferences of
each consumer are also different from one to another.
In the traditional business model, the movement of products and
most of the communication takes place in one direction, from producers to
consumers and through limited channels. However, at the present time, by
using the sophistication of internet, communication is taking place in two
directions, called interactive. Customers can learn more about the
company and the company can also gather more information about the
customer. As more information is obtained, in the hope it can strengthen
3
the relationship between the company, customers, and other parties. With
the development of Internet technology, companies then become
increasingly profitable. Companies can take advantage of the interactive
communication by start a dialogue with customers. Companies can also
build a network to create electronic word-of-mouth (e-WOM) that good
for their market.
Advancement in internet technology has also brought major
changes to the consumer, market, and marketing over the past few years.
Since the beginning of 2000, information technology has entered the main
market and developed into what is referred as the new wave of technology.
Kertajaya (2010) revealed that the new wave of technology is a technology
that enables connectivity and interactivity among individuals and groups.
New wave technology includes three main forces, namely: computers and
mobile phones which is affordable, cheap internet, and open source. This
technology allows someone to express themselves and collaborate with
others. Based on Scott McNealy (2015) the emergence of this new wave
technology is called a participation era, whereby everybody can freely
make the news, ideas, and entertainment, as well as to consume it. The
emergence of social media is also one of the new wave technology
development. Social media is evolving phenomenon, a shift in how people
discover, read, and share news, information, and content (Kertajaya,
2010).
4
In the early of 21st century is the century in which social media
began to grow rapidly and widely used. People began to have the variety
of the change and introduced to many applications and various tools that
are easy to use, friendlier, and free to use. No matter the type of
application used, most people will spend their time to use it. In addition,
people in the 21st century live together with technology and media-
suffused environment. It is indicated by a variety of characteristics, such as
access to get a lot of information as well as rapid changes in technology
tools and services. In order to be more effective in the 21st
century, there
are many choices of applications that can be used for various types of
activities or purpose by most internet users.
According to Forrester Research (2010), in the middle of 2008,
75% of internet users use social media to follow social networking,
reading the blog, or contribute by writing reviews on shopping sites. There
is significant growth in this regard, earlier in 2007, estimated that only
57% of Internet users use social media. The increasing of use of social
media is not just limited to teenagers, both members of generations X (i.e
adults between 35-44 years old) also participated in using social media,
observers, and became a critic of social media. In the prior explaination, it
has been mention that in Indoensia there are 77% of Indonesian youth
between 13 to 24 years old were internet users, and 69% of them agreed
with the statement that they would feel lost if they couldn‟t connect to
social media. Indonesians internet active users would spend an average of
5
more than five hours per day online, and almost half of this time is used on
social media. Therefore, it is fair to say that social media is a revolutionary
new trend that can attract companies to participate in this online space.
There are several kinds of social media, such as Twitter, Instagram,
Facebook, LinkedIn, Path, Youtube and so forth, but the most popular is
Facebook. Facebook is a social networking service that founded by Mark
Zuckerberg and launched in 4th
of February 2004. Market leader Facebook
was the first social network to surpass 1 billion registered accounts and
currently sits as 1.55 billion monthly active users, and 48 million of them
are Indonesian users (Statista team, 2016). The graph below shows
informations on the most popular networks worldwide as of January 2016,
ranked by number of active account.
Figure 1.2
Source : www.statista.com, 2016
1550
900 860 800 653 650
555 400
320 300
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
Number of Active Account in
Social Media
in Billion
6
Facebook is the most powerful social media and social networking
site. It has become one of the top social media platforms these days and
there are numerous advantages associated with it. Facebook allows the
users to connect with their family, friends, work colleague, and to meet
new people. But people not only can use it personally for connecting with
friends and family, but it has also turned out to be a handy tool for
promoting and advertising a business. Every business owner exactly
known that marketing strategies of a business can have huge impact on its
growth and success. It is esssential for business owners to promote their
services if they wish to draw in customers. And here, Facebook can be
extremely useful. The firms, or business owners can create a business page
or usually called group on Facebook that is similar to owning a website, it
is one of significant benefit that only Facebook can provide. With
Facebook groups, the users may form multiple smaller networks of people
inside Facebook and all members of that group can talk each other
simultaneously.
In order to browse to the internet and log in to the social media,
currently most people no longer to use personal computer. But now
smartphones are the most popular device for getting online. In Indonesia
itself, on 2013 is estimated that 24% of mobile phone users owned a
smartphone and this figure is projected to more than double to 53 % by
2017. The number of mobile phone users in the country stood at around
173 million in 2013 and will rise to over 195 million people by 2017. This
7
means that a projected 103.5 million people in Indonesia will own a
smartphone in 2017, equivalent to 37.5 percent of the entire population
(Statista team, 2016). The role of smartphone has become a primary need.
Every change in the technology expected to always be in line with human
needs. In this case the smartphone, from the initial appearance of
smartphones has been captured enthusiast from people until now they have
become a necessity. There have been many changes and developments in
technology applied to the manufacture of smartphones from the beginning
both in terms of features, functionality, design, and even the network used.
International Data Corporation (IDC) Worldwide Mobile Phone
Tracker (2016), in the second quarter of 2014 the worldwide smart phone
market grew 25,2% over year. A driving force behind the record
smartphone volume was the combined effort of the vendors trailing market
leaders Samsung and Apple. The next three vendors are Xiaomi, Lenovo,
and LG Electronics. All posted market-beating growth and with markedly
different strategies. The figure below shows the comparison of worldwide
shipment between Apple, Samsung, Xiaomi, and another smartphone
vendors on 2013 and 2014. It shows that Xiaomi is on the top three
position after Samsung and Apple.
8
Table 1.1
Top Five Smartphone Vendors based on Worldwide Shipment
3Q14 3Q14 3Q13 3Q13 3Q14/3Q13
Shipments Market Shipments Market Growth
Share Share
Samsung 78.1 23.8% 85 32.5% -8.2%
Apple 39.3 12.0% 33.8 12.9% 16.1%
Xiaomi 17.3 5.3% 5.6 2.1% 211.3%
Lenovo 16.9 5.2% 12.3 4.7% 38.0%
LG 16.8 5.1% 12.0 4.6% 39.8%
Others 159.2 48.6% 113 43.2% 40.8%
Total 327.6 100% 261.7 100% 25.2%
Source: www.appleinsider.com, 2016.
Xiaomi is a private owned Chinese electronics company
headquartered in Beijing, China. Xiaomi designs, develops, and sells
smartphones, mobile apps, and related consumer electronics. Since the
release of its first smartphone in August 2011, Xiaomi has gained market
share in mainland China and expanded into developing a wider range of
consumer electronics, including a smart home device ecosystem. The
company has over 8,000 employees, mainly in mainland China, Malaysia,
and Singapore, and it is expanding to other countries such as India,
Indonesia, Philippines, and Brazil. According to IDC, in October 2014,
Xiaomi was the third largest smartphone maker in the world, following
Samsung and Apple Inc., and followed by Lenovo and LG. Xiaomi
became the largest smartphone vendor in China in 2014, having overtaken
Samsung (International Data Corporation, 2016).
9
Xiaomi has emerge as new star in the smartphone world with
feature and price and one of the important things is the unique and
different marketing strategies that have stole the attention of the
smartphone users. Xiaomi has a pretty unique marketing and pricing
strategy with a plan to sell high-end smartphone at slightly beyond the cost
of materials and eventually monetize through software and services. Its
two main strategies are; earning profit from its software and zero
advertising. Xiaomi‟s revenue stream comes from its software- the highly-
customizable MIUI firmware that is based on Android which already has
more than 60 million users, earning approximately US$4.9 million
monthly revenue from apps, games, and theme customizations installed on
MIUI. Thus unlike Apple, for example, which makes money from margins
on selling its phones, Xiaomi is a more like Amazon where it wants to
earn via its ecosystem by selling various goodies and reap profits like an
ecommerce company.
The second strategy is called zero adverising, whereby it is able to
save a ton of cash by avoiding advertising cost and rather to deploy some
innovative marketing strategies. Lei Jun, a Xiaomi founder, didn‟t want to
spend money on marketing, so his crew began building brand awareness in
forums. His staff spent a lot of time on forums, making comments, sending
posts, and advertising. They used the same method to do marketing with
zero budget, they set up MIUI mobile phone forum, which became the
base camp of “Mi fans” in both of social media Facebook and on its
10
website with over 1 million registered users. In the short word, we can say
that Xiaomi shuns traditional models of advertising and depends solely on
social media marketing and word-of-mouth.
Despite Xiaomi did not use massive advertisement, but its slowly
but steadily growing in emerging market. Brazil being the first country out
of Xiaomi‟s safest market Asia, will help the company to accelerate its
growth. In the past, nearly 90 percent of Xiaomi‟s smartphone are sold in
China, followed by India where the company has successfully sold over 2
million devices within 12 months since the launch. In the last few years,
Xiaomi has received an unprecedented response from the market. The
sales of smartphone grew by more than 300% between 2013 and 2014.
Since January 2012, the company has sold 121.64 million smartphones
(Dazeinfo team, 2016). And also, based on Flurry Analytics, on 2013
Apple has the highest share with 35%, Samsung 15% in second position,
then followed by Xiaomi 6%, and other manufacturer occupy 44% share.
This statistics indicate that Xiaomi, which sold its first phone in 2011, is
going to come out as a major competitor for international brands in the
coming years. Xiaomi has even beaten major international brands like
HTC, LG, Sony and Motorola and local brands like Huawei, Lenovo, ZTE
and Oppo.
11
Figure 1.3
Xiaomi Market Share
Therefore, through this thesis, the researchers interested in conducting
research on Xiaomi which with its strategy of zero advertising, Xiaomi can
compete with two great leaders in the smartphone market, which is Apple
and Samsung and another competitors beat in just over 3 years. As already
mentioned, Xiaomi does not use traditional marketing methods and highly
depend on online marketing. We know that online marketing will become
stronger if accompanied with good electronic service quality. Electronic
service quality has been regarded as having the potential not only to
deliver strategic benefits, but also to enhance operational efficiency and
profitability. Electronic service qualty is also becoming even more critical
for companies to retain and attract customers. Besides of that, electronic
Apple
Others
Samsung Xiaomi
12
service quality has strong impacts on customer satisfaction. What brings
online customers back to company‟s websites is a sense of loyalty that
comes from good services offered by companies. Based on Lewin (2009),
another benefits of customer satisfaction are include increases in revenue,
decreases in customer-related transaction cost, and reduction in price
elasticity among repeat buyers. When customer is staisfied with the service
given by the company, the tendency to be loyal to that company is usually
high because of positive reinforcement and other potential customers are
encouraged to do business with the company. Thus, word-of-mouth
communication is a primary indicator of a company‟s future success.
As times goes by, Word-of-mouth (WOM) communication currently
is one of an important marketing phenomenon. Marketing research has
found that WOM communication is the important source that influence
consumers‟ attitudes and behaviors (Brown and Reingen 1987, as cited in
Yoon,2008:2), purchasing products or services (Katz and Lazarsfeld 1955,
as cited in Yoon, 2008:2) , or judging products or services (Reingen and
Kernan 1986). WOM is crucial because, the value of complex information
goods is hard to assess because it is only possible to value them after either
trying them or understanding its content. In other words, many information
and cultural goods are experience goods that a consumer needs to taste
before assessing its quality with respect to his or her ideal product (Brown
and Reingen 1987, as cited in Yoon,2008:2). When the consumers are
faced to evaluate products or brands that are unfamiliar to them, they may
13
seek the experience of other consumers as a means of managing the risks
and prefer to rely on WOM information about product attributes (Herr
et.al., 1991, as cited in Yoon, 2008:2). This is because, WOM information
as compared to marketer-provided attribute information or advertisements,
is more vivid (Herr et.al,. 1991, as cited in Yoon, 2008:2), easy to use, or
perceived as more trustworthy because it is based on the experiences of
others (Smith and Park, 1992, as cited in Yoon, 2008:2).
The traditional Word-of-mouth (WOM) is such a communication
mode which possible for people to share their opinion and comments
regarding the product or service that they were transacting. However,
WOM has evolved into an entirely new form of communication that
exploits modern technology. This term called Electronic of Word of
Mouth (e-WOM) communication. The advent and growth of the digital
age built on the foundation of computing and the internet has seen the
development and adoption of new ways of accessing and assessing
consumer trends. Consumers have embraced and will continually tap the
importance of internet in the exchange of opinions, posting of comments,
reviews, and critiques on the digital platform. The digital platform is
constituted of weblogs, newsgroups, discussion forums, social network
websites, review websites, and online newspaper columns. Truly, word of
mouth has found a new way to assert its value to product marketing in new
forms of communication. One type of e-WOM is online consumer
reviews, it consists of analyses and commentaries generated and posted by
14
the end users of products who have spent their money on the product and
used it. It is a credible source of consumer insight and it can be used by
businesses to make corrective or improvement measures on their products
and services. Through online reviews, different customers will share their
shopping experiences, while the potential shoppers will wait for the
comments of other shoppers before taking up an offer. Besides of that,
electronic word-of-mouth could be one of the most believable form and
affect consumer‟s choices of products from the WOM that spread by other
consumers (Herr, et.al 1991). Moreover, the Internet allows peoples‟
opinions can be more easily and quickly accessible to other consumers.
Advices and product using experiences from online users become
influential for their behavior and e-WOM is regarded as a critical source
for consumers making a purchase intention (Thompson, 2003).
Based on research background, the title of the study is “The
Influence of Electronic Word-of-Mouth through Social Media
Facebook and Electronic Service Quality towards Purchase Intention
(Case Study of Xiaomi Smartphone Users in Mi Forum.)”
15
B. Problem Formulation
Based on the issues that are examined, the formulations of the problem
from this research are:
1. Is there any influence of electronic word-of-mouth toward purchase
intention partially on Xiaomi smartphone user among community in
Mi Forum?
2. Is there any influence of electronic service quality toward purchase
intention partially on Xiaomi smartphone user among community in
Mi Forum?
3. Is there any influence of electronic word-of-mouth and electronic
service quality simultaneously toward purchase intention partially on
Xiaomi smartphone user among community in Mi Forum?
C. Research Objectives
Based on problems that have been formulated, then the purpose of the
research is to:
1. Analyze the influence of electronic word-of-mouth toward purchase
intention
2. Analyze the influence of electronic service quality toward purchase
intention
3. Analyze the influence of electronic word-of-mouth and electronic
service quality simultaneously toward purchase intention
16
D. Research Benefits
This research will provide following benefits:
1. For the Company
The result of this study is expected to be used as an information
materials for Xiaomi itself in order to measure how big the influence
of electronic service quality and electronic word-of-mouth toward
customers' purchase intention. Xiaomi can use this data as it
reference to improve the quality of the Xiaomi‟ product itself or its
online services
2. For the Researcher
Researcher can learn on how electronic service quality and
electronic word-of-mouth on Xiaomi smart phone influence
purchase intention
3. For the Reader
This study is expected to provide a reference for all students and
academics who want to study the problem related to marketing,
especially purchasing intentions. And as a work that can be used as
a discourse and library for students or academics who have an
interest examined in the same field.
17
CHAPTER II
LITERATURE REVIEW
A. Theory Development
This chapter will be focusing on understanding the definition and
theory which are related with the research. And continue with the
elaboration of the influence of electronic word of mouth and electronic
service quality towards purchase intention.
1. Internet Retailing
It is now widely recognised that the Internet‟s power, scope and
interactivity provide retailers with the potential to transform their
customers‟ shopping experience (Evanschitzky et.al., 2004:240) and
strengthen their own competitive positions (Doherty and Ellis, 2009:1248).
The Internet‟s capacity to provide information, facilitate two-way
communication with customers, collect market research data, promote
goods and services and ultimately to support the online ordering of
merchandise, provides retailers with an extremely rich and flexible new
channel (Basu and Muylle, 2003). In doing so, the Internet gives retailers a
mechanism for broadening target markets, improving customer
communications, extending product lines, improving cost efficiency,
enhancing customer relationships, and delivering customised offers
(Srinivasan et.al, 2002:41). By and large, consumers have responded
enthusiastically to these innovations and online retail sales have grown
18
significantly over the past fifteen years, and are predicted to continue
rising into the future (Doherty and Ellis, 2009:1248)
2. Social media marketing
The rise and wide spread of Internet and the fast growing
consumers‟ digital media use led companies occupied in different business
sectors to think about a new way of communication with customers
(Cheong and Morrison, 2008:39). Among the fastest growing online tools
for reaching the consumers is called “social media” (Trusov, et.al.,
2009:92). Social media is becoming an important part in peoples‟ lives as
can be seen from the recent marketing approaches done in that sphere. The
results from these approaches are astonishing. The world spends 110
billion minutes on social media networks and blog sites (Nielsen
Company, 2016). They also stated that the number of people who are
visiting social media sites has increased by 24% over the last year. All
these facts don‟t even leave a doubt how fast is social media emerging in
business sector and peoples‟ lives. For marketers this phenomenon is of
high interest as social media is becoming an important source of customer
information sharing, awareness, support, and empowerment (Kaplan
and Haenlein, 2010:60). Consequently social media allows businesses
to effectively and inexpensively engage in direct client contact,
reaching levels of efficiency undoubtedly higher than any other traditional
marketing communication tools (Berthon et.al., 2008:30). There are
many evidences and examples how companies use social media for
19
more efficient communication and better results. In 2010, Facebook
has reported 400 million users from which 1.5 million are business
(Statista, 2015). Therefore, marketers should more aware of the
importance of this platforms and the information spread throughout them.
Social media marketing has several advantages. First advantage is,
it provides a window for marketers to not only present products or service
to customers but also to listen to customer‟s suggestions. Second, it makes
marketer easier to identify various peer groups which can help in
organizing growth of a brand, and third, all this is done at nearly zero cost
as most of social networking sites are free.
3. Consumer Behaviour
Consumer is defined as someone who acquires goods or services
for direct use or ownership rather than for resale or use in production and
manufacturing (Ajibola and Njogo, 2012:136). While behavior is a tool to
achieve objectives and target consumer derives from his needs and desires
(Wilke, 2000:). There are some powers that consumers have. One of the
present fundamental presumptions for the consumer behavior is the fact,
that people often buy products not because of their main function but for
their main subjectively perceived value. It does not mean that product‟s
basic function is not important, but that‟s todays role of products exceeds
its service limits (Salomon, 2004).
20
Based on Kotler and Keller (2000), consumer behavior is mental
activity, emotional, and physical that people use during selection,
purchase, use, and dispose of products and servies that satisfy their needs
and desires. While, according to Rani (2014:54), consumer behavior refers
to the selection, purchase, and consumption goods and services for the
satisfaction of their wants. There are different process involved in the
customer behavior. Initially consumer tries to looking for what kind of
commodities that he would like to consume, then he selects only those
commodities that promise greater utility. After selecting the commodities,
consumer makes an estimate of the available money that he can spend.
Lastly, consumer analyzes the prevailing prices of commodities and takes
decision regarding the commodities he should consume. Based on Rani
(2014:54), consumer‟s buyer behavior is influenced by four major factors,
they are cultural, social, personal, and psychological. The influence of
culture on buying behavior varies from country to country, therefore,
marketers have to be very careful in analyzing the culture of different
groups, regions or even countries. Throughout his existence, an individual
will be influenced by his family, his friends, hiscultural environment or
society that will teach him values, preferences as well as common
behaviors to their own culture. The second factor, which is social factor is
include groups (i.e reference group, aspirational group, and member
group), family, roles, and status. This explains the outside influences of
others on purchase decisions directly or indirectly. Next factor is about
21
personal factor. It includes such variables as age and lifecycle stage,
occupation, economic circumstances, lifestyle (activities, interests,
opinions and demographics), personality, and self concept. These may
explain why our preferences often change as our „situation‟ changes.
Decisions and buying behavior are obviously also influenced by the
characteristics of each consumer. The last factor is about psychological
factor. It affecting consuer‟ purchase decision includes motivation,
perception, learning, beliefs, and attitudes.
4. Word-of-Mouth Communication
Word-of-mouth (WOM) communications have long been an
important marketing phenomenon. WOM can be defined as the exchange
of oral or spoken messages between a sender and a receiver concerning the
purchase of a goods or service in real time and space (Ong, 1982, as cited
in Yoon, 2008:2). Based on Arndt (1967 as cited in Yoon, 2008:2), word
of mouth communication is a form of personal communication in which an
individual receives information directly from another individual. The other
expertise, Westbrook (1987:260) defined word of mouth communication
as all informal communication directed at other consumers about the
ownership, usage, or characteristics of particular goods or their sellers.
Therefore, it is such an instrumental in shaping consumers‟ attitudes and
behaviours. Word of mouth communication is regarded as exceptionally
powerful by having a strong influence on consumers‟ choice and thus also
consumers‟ purchase decision-making (Prendergast et.al.,2010).
22
Regardless of the word of mouth communication medium, it is generally
not motivated by profit, it is independent of commercial influences, and its
communication about the products, brands, or services happens with or
without related companies‟ permission (Kietzmann et.al., 2011:243)
In order to examine how WOM influences consumers‟ decision-
making, the researchers have to identify certain motives behind
consumers‟ engagement in traditional and electronic WOM. There are four
factors that make people engage in word of mouth communication
according to Schiffman and Kanuk (2000), which are:
a. The product involvement that arises because people want to express
their satisfaction of using the product by talking to others.
b. The self-enhancement that cause communication word of mouth
because people want to satisfy the needs of a particular emotional (self
confirmation) for example to get the attention of others to be
considered as a smart buyer
c. Message involvement that arises due to the unique and interesting
advertisements or information about a particular product and make
consumers want to talk about it with others
d. Other involvement emerged because he wanted to help others
5. Traditional versus Electronic Word-of-Mouth
As explained before, there are several things exhibited by both
forms of word-of-mouth. However, there are also certain differing
23
characteristics that might have a stronger or lesser influence on
consumers‟ purchase decision making. This figure below shows the most
important diverse characteristics of WOM communication.
Figure 2.1
Differences between offline WOM and online WOM
Source : Gfrerer, A. & Pkory, J (2012). Journal of International Marketing.
Based on the figure,the channel of providing and receiving
information is either offline, via social network such as friends, family,
peers, and colleagues, or through online, via social media such as social
networking sites, blogs, or forums. Regardless of the form of WOM, it is
argued that the purpose is based on the same nature of sharing information
24
concerning individuals‟ experience with products, brands or services,
without any commercial intentions. The traditional WOM is a synchronous
conversation and occurs face-to-face, while electronic WOM is an
asynchronous process, whereby both of time and geographical distance are
of little or no essence.
Moreover, e-WOM can reach a higher number of individuals and
has implied characteristics of a rapid diffuse. It is differ with the traditional
form, which is generally shared with a relatively low number of people
and it is incapable of diffusing rapidly. Further, electronic WOM is rather
of an anonymous nature, as individuals usually do not know the
information provider. In contrast, traditional WOM is rather private and
characterized by an interpersonal environment. Thus for the latter also
social ties are considered to be stronger in traditional WOM than for
electronic WOM, which is specified in the following subsections. Due to
the fact that social networking sites are public, consumers and marketers
are able to observe the given information much easier. Incidentally,
companies have very limited or no influence on how people act online;
they can seldom foresee the written information about their products,
brands or services. Overall, the phenomenon of WOM communication is
strongly enabled by the rising use of social media platforms. Thus, it might
be easier to find expert information online; and expertise is exceptionally
valued in the context of high-involvement products.
25
6. Traditional Word-of-Mouth
According to Arndt (1967, as cited in Buttle, 1998:242) WOM is
an oral, person-to-person communication between a receiver and a
communicator whom the receiver perceives as non-commercial, regarding
a brand, product, or service. Thus, it is the spoken word in a face-to-face
situation involving sharing product or brand information. Further, a
fleeting nature of WOM is argued, due to its spontaneous occurrence,
which is terminated as soon as the exchange has been expressed
(Breazeale, 2008 as cited in Gferer and Pokrywka, 2012:15). Its
interactions are immediate and involve intimate conversations (Steffes and
Burgee, 2009).
7. Electronic Word-of-Mouth (e-WOM)
Recently, customers have been turning towards the internet and
make it as a source of word-of-mouth communication, more commonly
known as electronic word of mouth (e-WOM) (Gruen et.al., 2005:451).
E-WOM refers to any attempt by a potential, actual, or former customer to
highlight the positive or negative attributes of a product or company in an
online platform (Hennig et.al., 2004:40), and also considered as an
important influencer of consumers purchasing decisions (Shapiro, 2008).
Thus, e-WOM is transmitted via written words and a large number of
consumers are able to receive and potentially spread the initial message
online. So this is indicates that e-WOM is actually faster than offline
26
WOM (Prendergast et.al., 2010:690). Accordingly, e-WOM has virtually
an unlimited reach and due to its bidirectional communication properties it
is considered as a one-to-world platform rather than as one-to-one
platform (Dellarocas, 2002 as cited in Gferer and Pokrywka, 2012:20).
Because of the separation of both time and distance between sender
and receiver, e-WOM is also considered as an asynchronous process and
in contrast to the traditional form it is viewed as more persistent and
usually more easily accessible. (Steffes and Burgee, 2009:45). This is
mainly due to the fact that most of the text-based information is archived
on the social media platform and is commonly available for an indefinite
period of time (Cheung and Thadani, 2010). Furthermore, e-WOM offers a
better measurability due to its presentation format, quantity and
persistence, which is easier to observe than in traditional WOM. Thus, e-
WOM is more voluminous in quality, compared to information received
from traditional contacts within an offline state (Chatterjee, 2001:131).
The concept of e-WOM may occur in different ways. Customers can post
their comments, opinions, and reviews of products and services on
different channels; like discussion forums, weblogs, review websites, and
social networking sites (e.g., facebook, Youtube, Twitter etc.).
According to Hennig-Thurau et.al., (2004:41) marketing
professionals needs to pay more attention for e-WOM communications. A
lot of customers preferred reading suggestions given by experienced
customers before buying certain types of products or services, especially
27
those related to product information in general, opinions given by
experienced customers were found to significantly have an effect on new
customers‟ purchasing decision-making (Senecal and Nantel, 2004:162).
While many customers search for comments about products and services
online during pre purchasing stage, a lot of customers also shared opinions
both positive and negative comments about their experience of using the
products and services online at the post purchasing stages (Frambach
et.al., 2007:30). Throughout direct and continous interacting with
customers; marketers can drive customers to carry out more effective e-
WOM behaviors from different platforms. The variety of online platforms
includes: corporate official websites, online communities, newsgroups,
chat rooms, emails, blogs, microblogs, customer review websites, virtual
customer communities, forums and other SNSs; enabled customers to
interact with each others swiftly and easily without boundaries (Strutton
et.al., 2011).
Compared to the traditional form, e-WOM is rather of anonymous
nature, which might have influence on consumers‟ determination of
quality and credibility of the messages (Lee and Youn, 2009). While
searching or providing advice, consumers do not have to expose their real
identities, which might enhance consumers to share opinions or
experiences with others, thus leading to an increasing volume of e-WOM
(Chatterjee, 2001). As a result of online platforms‟ functioning, consumers
receive a large and diverse set of expertise opinions about specific
28
products, services, or brands from individuals whom they have no or only
little prior relationship (Duhan et.al., 1997). So that, it might be easier to
find specific information online rather than offline.
In this research, e-WOM is viewed from three dimensions, they
are; e-WOM quality, e-WOM quantity, and sender‟s expertise. These three
dimensions will be clearly explain as below :
a. Quality of e-WOM
Based on Horrison-Walker, (2001), the quality of e-WOM refers to
the persuasive strength of comments embedded in an informational
message. Consumer buying decision can be based on some criteria that
meet their needs and to determined their willingness to buy will be
based on their perceived of quality of information they received.
Therefore, it is important to determine consumer‟s perception of
information quality as element for assessing their potential buying
decision. Once the e-WOM on the site gains consumer attention,
consumers begin to judge whether the review is worth reading.
Information quality was proven as a significant predictor of the success
of an information system. Consumers care about the correctness and
usefulness of e-WOM, and good content quality increases their
willingness to trust e-WOM. Based on Horrison-Walker (2001), the
online review should be understandable. Use proper grammar and
concise, so that readers can easily understand the information given.
Besides of that, it is very crucial that online review should be helpful.
29
Helpful here means that online reviews give clear and accurate
information about a particular product, so it can assist customer who
are likely to search a review about the product. The online review
should also has the credibility, means that the review consist of quality
of being believable or worthy trust informations. In general, the
reviewer should gave a high quality of review.
b. Quantity of e-WOM
When a consumer searches for online reviews, the quantity of e-
WOM makes the reviews become more observable (Cheung and
Thadani, 2010). Quantity of e-WOM refers to the total number of
posted comments (Godes and Mayzlin, 2004). The popularity of the
product is determined by quantity of online comments because
considered could represent the market performance of product (Godes
and Mayzlin, 2004). In other words, consumers may perceive that
more reviews represent higher product popularity (Godes and Mayzlin,
2004). Reading numerous reviews by others could reduce consumer
anxiety when making a purchase decision because consumers reason
that many others have also purchased the product. Consumer also need
reference to strengthened their confidence to reduce the feeling making
mistake or risk while shopping. With the highly recommendation
given by reviewers for a certain product, it is inferring that the product
has good reputation (Godes and Mayzlin, 2004). So it is strongly
agreed that quantity of e-WOM will influenced customer in make
30
decision for buying a product (Godes and Mayzlin, 2004). Some
empirical studies (Sher and Lee 2009:137) provided evidence that e-
WOM quantity positively influences the consumer-perceived
credibility of e-WOM.
c. Sender‟ Expertise
Bloch and Richin (1986, as cited in Chang et.al.,) discovered that
consumers with higher proficiency can make brisk valuation and
correct judgment due to their abundant product knowledge and
experience; this makes them become information sources sought by
consumers who is not familiar with the products or services. This
viewpoint that highly proficient consumers are often consulted targets
of the masses supported by Gilly, Graham, Wolfinbarger, and Yale
(1998, as cited in Chang et.al). Gilly, et.al.,(1998 as cited in Chang
et.al.) also found that sender‟s expertise positively affects on the
receiver‟s purchase intention.
Moreover, the sender‟s expertise is also an important criterion for
judging the trustworthiness of the information source and is considered
a critical influential factor of information (Hu, et.al., 2008). Hu,
et.al.,(2008) also thought that since expertise comes partly from one‟s
own experience and partly from one‟s own knowledge; when the
sender exhibits high expertise, the receiver will think the provided
information will be more correct, and hence the purchase decision will
more likely be influenced by the information senders convey. In the
31
short word, the author stated that a reviewer should be able to giving
judgement on something objectively and specifically. Hu, et.a., (2008)
also discovered that the sender‟s expertise as “authoritativeness,”
“competence,” and “expertness” affected positively the receiver‟s
purchase intention. These three factors then lead customer to be more
confident in making purchases.
8. Service Quality
In todays competitive business environment, marketing managers
is now are more concern to looking for some innovative ways in order to
fulfill customer expectation and meeting the demand for customer
satisfaction is also very crucial for them. There is growing managerial
interest in customer satisfaction as a means of evaluating quality. High
customer satisfaction ratings are widely believed to be the best indicator of
company‟s future profit. Customer satisfaction is defined as a customer‟s
overall evaluation of the performance of an offering to data. This overall
satisfaction has strong positive effect on customer loyalty intentions across
a wide range of product and service categories (Gustafson, 2005). Mittal
and Kamakura (2001:133) defined that customer satisfaction is a key
factor in formation of customer‟s desires for future purchase. This is
because, the satisfied customers will probably talk to others about their
good experiences, so it will makes the repeated purchases.
One of the crucial factor that need to be considered by marketing
manager in order to create satisfied customer is by focusing on company's
32
service quality. Service quality is needed for creating customer satisfaction
and service quality is connected to customer perceptions and customer
expectations. Oliver and Ronald (1997) argues that service quality can be
described as the result from customer comparisons between their
expectations about the service they will use and their perceptions about the
service company. It means, if the perceptions would be higher than the
expectations the service will be considered excellent, if the expectations
equal the perceptions the service is considered good and if the expectations
are not met the service will be considered as bad.
To contextualized electronic service quality, an examination of
service quality scale is required since most of the current e-service quality
scales are developed based on the service quality instrument. The service
quality (SERVQUAL) scale was developed by Parasuraman et.al,(1988 as
cited in Hongxiu and Reima, 2009:2) that aim to providing a generic
instrument to measuring service quality across broad range of service
categories, the widely used service quality instrument is composed of five
dimensions, which are based on the original ten dimensions developed.
Those five dimensions of service quality are:
a. Tangibles : The appearance of physical facilities,
equipment, personnel, and communication
materials
b. Reliability : The ability to perform the promised service
dependability and accurately
33
c. Responsiveness :The willingness to help customers and
provide prompt services
d. Assurance : The knowledge and courtesy of employees
and their ability to convey trust and
confidence
e. Empathy : Care and individualized attention provided
to customers
Service quality scales has been widely used to measure service
quality in various service industries, and some studies applied this
service qualiy model to measure service quality in the context of e-
service by rewording its items. However, the employing of the
SERVQUAL scale by rewording its items seems to be inefficient in the
context of e-service, and the generic dimensions of the SERVQUAL
model need to be reformulated in order to be used meaningfully in the
context of e-service since e-service is quite different from traditional
service with three aspects standing out (Hongxiu and Reima, 2009:2)
a. The absence of sales staff. In e-service, there is no service
encounters between the customers and the sales staff as in the
traditional service.
b. The absence of traditional tangible element. In e-service,
service process is almost completed in the virtual environment
with some intangible elements.
34
c. Self-service of customers. In e-service, customers conduct self-
service in purchasing and realize control in business process.
By considering the differences between traditional service
and e-service, obviously the SERVQUAL scale is not suitable for
measuring e-service quality. New scales which suitable for measuring
e-service quality will be ealborated on the electronic service quality
passage.
9. Electronic Service Quality
As we know with rapid development of information,
communication technology, and the globalization of the market, Internet
and World Wide Web (WWW) have become important tools in business.
Distanc eand time barriers are vanishing and the world is becoming an
integrated community of buyers and sellers that interact via the Internet.
Internet has significantly revolutionized business market in the last decade.
Services are radically shifted to digital form and delivered through the
Internet. Additionally, the internet offers an interactive function with its
customers (Santos, 2003) and enables electronic service (e-service) move
to the forefront of technology priorities (Voss, 2003). Companies accepted
and adopted the new information and communication technology in the
performance of their activities, not only to support traditional activities,
but also to support those arising from new opportunities, mainly from the
Internet (Hongxiu and Reima, 2009).
35
Electronic service quality (e-SQ) is a new developing area of
research, which has strategic importance for businesses striving to address
customers in the electronic marketplace. Parasuraman and Zinkhan
(2002:290) maintain that electronic services contribute two key
advantages, which are information and transaction efficiency. Electronic
service quality is a basic requirement for the good performance of
electronic channels (José and Ainhize, 2009). Zeithaml, et.al.,(2002:362)
believe that e-service experience greatly affects the establishment of trust
and relation with customers, and enterprises must pay attention in this
regard. Oliveira et.al., (2002) believe that e-service quality can increase
the competition of the company‟s requirement fulfillment. A higher level
of e-SQ contributes to achieving the main business goals (Zeithaml et.al.,
2002). Oliveria et.al., (2002) state also that electronic service (e-service)
might be the key to long-term advantages in the digital times, and e-
service quality is becoming even more critical for companies to retain and
attract customers in the digital age and can increase the competition of the
company‟s requirement fulfillment (Oliveria et.al., 2002). Based on
Zeithaml et.al., (2002) electronic service quality (e-SQ) is the extent
to which a Website facilitates an efficient and effective shopping,
purchasing, and delivery of products and services. Based on Santos (2003)
e-SQ can be defined as overal customer evaluations and judgments
regarding the execellence and quality of e-service delivery in the virtual
marketplace.
36
The differences between traditional and electronic service quality
is the replacement of interpersonal interaction with human-machine
interaction. This distinction raises many questions concerning the types of
dimensions that must be considered to assess service quality in the e-
commerce context. With no human interaction present when online
transactions take place, certain applicable dimensions must be present in
order to accurately assess the service quality on a web site (Madu and
Madu, 2002:247). Websites need to be effective in the sense that they
should have accurate product related information available for internet
shoppers as this could lead to a purchase. Likewise, if information is
insufficient, purchases could be lost.
10. Electronic Service Quality Dimensions
With the incresing application of e-commerce in the organization,
the importance of measuring and monitoring e-service quality in the
virtual world has been recognized. Previous studies have argued that the
following factors are usually involved as service quality dimensions:
Reliability, responsiveness, empathy, security, web design, assurance,
efficiency, ease of use, accessibility, courtesy, and credibility (Zeithaml
et.al, 2000; Wolfinbarger and Gilly, 2003; Ho and Lee, 2007; Madu and
Madu, 2002; Yang and Jun, 2002; Jun and Cai, 2001). This research
purposes 5 electronic service quality dimensions such as reliability,
website design, security, empathy, and responsiveness.
37
a. Reliability
Reliability means the ability to perform the promised
service dependability and accurately (Zeithaml et.al., 2000). So
the related company should ensuring that it delivers its
promise. (i.e promises regarding the delivery, service provision,
problem resolutions, and pricing). Another authors stated that
reliability is a technical function of the website such as the
extent to which it is available and functioning properly
(Cristian and Julian (2007),). Jessica (2003) stated that
reliability refers to the ability to perform the promised service
accuracy and consistently, involving frequency of updating the
website, prompt reply to customer enquiries and accuracy of
online purchasing and billing.
According to Cox and Dale (2010) reliability is determined
as consistency of performance and dependability, which is
relevant to the web site design. Reliability consists of two
aspects, namely; the degree to which a customer is able to
use the order process on the site easily and effectively as
well as the degree to which the company is able to fulfil its
promise and obligations to customers every time a purchase is
made. Reliability implies that if an online business
promises to do something at a certain time they should do it at
that promised time. So that is why reliability is the most
38
important dimension in e-service quality (Zeithaml et.al.,
2000). In the virtual environment, it is crucial to make
customers to trust that the company is going to perform what it
promises to do. Based on Zeithaml et.al., (2000 as cited in
Hongxiu and Reima, 2009:6) the following attributes in
reliability indicators can make customers recognize the
consistency and credibility of the company providing its e-
service. Namely; information accuracy, keeping service
promise, website always available, functioning properly, and
ease to use, and company being truthful about its offering.
b. Website Design
The tangible elements on the service quality refer to the
physical facilities, equipments and the appearance of the staff.
In the virtual environment of e-service, the tangible elements
should be focused on the website design since it constitutes the
main access to organizations and to gain a successful purchase
process (Wolfinbarger and Gilly, 2003). An empirical study
finds that the factors of the website design are strong predictors
of customer quality judgments, satisfactions, and loyalties for
the Internet retailers (Wolfinbarger and Gilly, 2003). The
deficiency of website design can result in a negative impression
of the website quality to the customers, and customer may exit
the purchase process. Website is the starting point for
39
customers to gain confidence. Thus, based on Wolfinbarger and
Gilly (2003), website should meet the following attributes in
order to attract customers to conduct purchasing online easily
with good navigation and clear information on the website;
appealling and well-organized website, consistent and
standardized navigation, and clear information provided.
c. Security
Security refers to the freedom form danger, risks or doubts
during the service process (Ho and Lee, 2007). Security is one
of the main barrier to customer making purchases and a web
site should indicate the extent to which it is secure. This
dimension holds an important position in e-service. Customers
perceive significant risks in the virtual environment of e-
service stemming from the possibility of improper use of their
financial data and personal data, which is an important barrier
to online customers to purchase online. A good website should
able to protect both of personal and related financial data,
shows obvious terms of payment and delivery, and also have a
good reputation in customer‟s mind. Becuase through this
security protection will in turn give customers peace of mind
knowing that all transactions will be dealt with in a safe and
secure manner.
40
d. Empathy
Even though there is no direct human interaction in the
virtual e-service process, some human contacts are involved in
e-service, for example e-mail communication. Providing
customer individual attention shows empathy to customers.
Response to customers should always be realize of the
customer‟s needs and show understanding of customer‟s needs.
In the virtual environment of e-service, empathy is important in
customer‟s perception of the e-service quality without face-to-
face encounters. Based on Madu and Madu (2002), an
electronic servicce should be consistently courteous in serving
customers, give adequate contact information so that customers
can easily contact if found any further query or faced related
issues, a website also should able to address complaints
friendly, and have a good personal attetion to the customers.
e. Responsiveness
Compared to responsiveness in service quality,
responsiveness in e-service quality is a much narrow concept.
In e-service quality, the company provides prompt service to
customers through digital media so when customers have
questions or problems, which make customers more
comfortable during purchasing and continue purchasing
without interruption. Online customers expect the response to
41
be quick and efficient when a problem occurs while they are
online or even after receiving the ordered product. A business
should be able to provide adequate contact and accurate
information to the customers when needed. It should also be
able to provide mechanisms for handling returns and have
guarantees by delivering their products in agreed period.
Another attributes of responsiveness indicators according to
Zeithaml, et.al.,(2000); give prompt response to the customers,
quickly solve problem such as problem that arise during
transaction process, and give adequate response time.
11. Purchase Intention
According to Kotler and Keller (2000), the consumer will go
through five stages in making purchasing decisions. But before getting to
the stage of purchase decision, there is purchase intention. Kotler and
Keller (2000) revealed that purchase inetention is in between the
alternative evaluation and purchasing decisions. It is illustrated in the
following diagram:
42
Figure 2.2
Stages between Evaluation of Alternatives and Purchase Decision
Source : Kotler, Philip (2000)
In the first stage, which is evaluation of alternatives, consumers
will pay more attention for the product attributes that provide the benefits
sought. After that, there will be an intention to buy. Purchase inetntion
influenced by the attitude for others and unanticipated situational factors to
decide the purchase (Kotler, 2000). The attitude of others will reduces by
someone's preferred alternative, it will depend on two things: the intensity
of people's negative attitude towards alternative preferred by consumers
and consumer motivation to obey the wishes of others. The more intense
the negative attitudes of others and the closer the person by the consumer,
the greater the interest of consumers will change their intention to
purchase and vice versa.
Whereas, unanticipated situational factors that appear can change
consumer buying interest, namely situations that indirectly affect someone
Evaluation of
Alternative
Purchase
Intention
Unanticipated
Situational
Factors
Attitudes of
others
Purchase
Decision
43
in a consumer buying interest, such as positive and negative information
that sudden received simultaneously (Kotler, 2000)
According to Sari and Kusuma (2014), purchase intention is the
most vital aspect of consumer behavior, which is defined as the situation
in which a customer is willing to make a transaction with the retailer. A
buyers attitude and evaluation and external components construct buyer‟s
purchase intention, and it is a important cause to predict buyer attitude
(Fishbein and Ajzen, 1975 as cited in Ali Raza, et.al., 2014). Purchase
intention can measure the possibility of a consumer to buy a product, and
the higher the purchase intention is, the higher a consumer‟s willingness is
to buy a product (Schiffman & Kanuk, 2000 as cited in Ali Raza, et.al.,
2014).
Fishbein and Ajzen (1975) said that the best single predictor of an
individual‟s behavior will be a measure of his intention to perform that
behavior. Purchase intention determine the consumer response to purchase
the offering product. The higher intention leads to elevated purchase of
that offering. Consumers purchase intention can be determined through
their responses, feedback, and their involvement. Highly involved
consumers shows high rate of purchase ( Schiffman and Kanuk, 2000).
Additionally, Schiffman and Kanuk‟ (2000) theory also explained
that the indicators of purchase intention consists of :
a. Interest to seeking information regarding the product
b. Interest to try the product
44
c. Considering to buy the product
d. Interest to own the product
12. Theory Reasoned Action
The theory reasoned action was formulated by Ajzen and Fishbein
in 1980. This theory is designed to predict volitional behaviors and help us
to understand customer‟s psychologial determinants. Theory reasoned
action is based on the assumption that human beings usually behave in
sensible manner; that they consider of available information and implicitly
or explicitly consider the implications of their actions (Kuhl, 1985).
Consistent with its focus on volitional behaviors, the theory postulates that
a person‟s intention to perform (or not to perform) a behavior is the
immediate determinant of that action. Barring unforseen events, people are
expected to act in accordance with their intention. However, intentions can
change over time; the longer time interval, the greater likelihood that
unforseen events will produce changes in intentions. It follow accuracy of
prediction will usually be an inverse function of the time interval between
measurement of intention and observation of behavior.
Since we are interested in understanding human behavior, not
merely in predicting it, we must next identify the determinants of
intentions. According to theory of reasoned action, a person‟s intention is
a function of two basic determinants; one personal in nature and other‟s
reflecting social influence. The personal factor is the individual‟s positive
45
or negative evaluation of performing the behavior, this factor is termed
attitude toward behavior. Note that theory of reasoned action is concerned
with attitudes toward behaviors and not with the more traditional attitude
toward objects, people, or institution. The second determinant of intention
is the person‟s perception of the social pressures put on him to perform or
not to perform the behavior in question. Since it deals with perceived
prescriptions, this factor is termed subjective norm. Generally, people
intend to perform a behavior when they evaluate it positively and when
they believe that important others think they should perform it.
Fishbein recognised that people‟s attitudes toward an object may
not be strongly or systematically related to their specific behaviors. Rather,
immediate determinant of whether cosnumers will engage in a particular
behavior is their intention to engage in that behavior. Fishbein modified
and extended his multiattribute attitude model to relate consumer‟s beliefs
and attitudes to their behavioral intentions. The model is called theory of
reasoned action because it assumes that consumers consciously consider
the consequences of the alternatives behaviors under consideration and
choose the one that leads to the most desirable consequences. The outcome
of this reasoned choice process is an intention to engage in the selected
behavior. This behavioral intention is the single best predictor of actual
behavior. In sum, the theory of reasoned action proposes that any
reasonably complex, voluntary behavior is determined by the person‟s
46
intention to perform that behavior. The theory of reasoned action is not
relevant fro extremely simple or involuntary behaviors.
B. Previous Research
The following description of previous research that became the
foundation of this research :
Table 2.1
Previous Research
Researcher Research Title Research Result
Shabnam Khosravani
Zangeneh et al. (2014)
Investigating the
effect of Electronic
Word of Mouth on
customer‟s purchase
intention of digital
product
This research aimed to examine the
effect of electronic word of mouth
on purchasing intention. The study
also considers the effects of quality
of e-WOM, quantity of e-WOM, as
well as reviewer‟s expertise on
purchasing intention. The study has
accomplished among 384 people
who have same experience on
buying digital devices from Iranian
well-known providers of electronic
devices in Teheran. The result shows
that quality of e-WOM and
reviewer‟s expertise affect
significantly cutsomer‟s purchasing
47
intention. While quantity of e-WOM
considered as less relevant factor.
Chinho Lin et.al, (2013) Electronic word of
mouth: The
moderating roles of
product involvement
and brand image
This research aimed to investigate
the influence e-WOM on purchasing
intention. Moreover, this study
examines the moderating effect of
product involvement and brand
image in the relationship between
the effects of electronic word of
mouth and purchase intention. The
results indicate that e-WOM quality,
e-WOM quantitym and sender‟s
expertise have positive effect on
purchase intention.
Ahmad J. Afshari et.al,
(2013)
The impactof service
quality on customer
satisfaction in internet
banking
This paper presents a study to
investigate service quality indexes in
internet banking. Six service quality
dimensions have been used, namely
reliability, efficiency,
responsiveness, fulfillment, security,
and website design. The study shows
that six service quality dimensions
has meaningful relationship with
48
customer satisfaction in internet
banking, whereby reliability has
most relation and website design has
least relation.
Hossein Vazifeh Doost
(2014)
Relationship of online
service quality with
customer‟s purchase
intention
This study used descriptive-
correlation method, that examine the
relationship of online service quality
with customer‟s purchase intention.
The purchase intention measured in
relation to the following dimensions:
efficiency,
reliability,responsiveness,fulfillment,
privacy, and empathy. The findings
confirmed there is significant
relationship of the dimension
responsiveness, privacy, and
empathy, while no significant
association was found between
dimensions efficiency, reliability,
and fulfillment.
49
C. Logical Framework
Figure 2.3
Purchase Intention (Y)
Data Quality Test
1. Validity Test
2. Reablity Test
Electronic Service
Quality (X2)
Electronic Word-of-
Mouth (X1)
Classic Assumption Test
1. Normality Test
2. Multicolinearity
3. Heterokesdasticty
Hyphotesis Test
1. T-Test
2. F-Test
Multiple Linier Regression
Coefficient of Determination
(Adjusted R²)
Conclusion
50
D. Hypothesis
Hypothesis is a temporary answer to the research problem
formulation, whereby the research problem formulation have been stated
in the form of a question sentence (Sugiyono, 2012:99). Hypothesis as a
temporary answer to the problems posed in this study are as follows:
1. Electronic Word-of-Mouth
a. Ho : β1 = 0;
There is no influence between electronic word-of-mouth
partially toward purchase intention
b. Ho : β1 ≠ 0;
There is influence between electronic word-of-mouth partially
toward purchase intention
2. Electronic Service Quality
a. Ho : β2 = 0;
There is no influence between electronic service quality partially
toward purchase intention
b. Ha : β2 ≠ 0;
There is influence between electronic service quality partially
toward purchase intention
51
3. Electronic Word-of-Mouth and Electronic Service Quality
towards Purchase Intention
a. Ho : β1, β2 = 0;
There is no influence between electronic word-of-mouth and
electronic service quality simultaneously towards purchase
intention
b. Ha : β1, β2 ≠ 0;
There is influence between electronic word-of-mouth and
electronic service quality simultaneously towards purchase
intention
52
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
A. Scope of Research
This research is empirical study that investigate on how the electronic
word-of-mouth and electronic service quality influence purchase intention on
Xiaomi smartphone users in MiForum. The respondent of this research will
focus on the Xiaomi smartphone user who have been bought Xiaomi‟ product
through its online website and joined Xiaomi group called ” MiForum”. The
respondent is also obligate to own Facebook account. This research is
conducted since June 2016 until the completion of this research writing.
This research used a quantitative method research that aim to clarify the
effect of independent variable which are electronic word-of-mouth (X1) and
electronic service quality (X2) to the dependent variable which is purchase
intention (Y)
B. Sampling Method
1. Population
Malhotra (2004:314) defines population as the aggregate of all
elements, sharing some common set of characteristics that comprises
the universe for the purpose of the marketing research problem.
Population is the generalization, which consists of object or subject
that has certain quantity and characteristics applied by researchers to
be learnt and then drawn the conclusion. So the population is not only
53
about people but also objects and another natural object. The
population is also not only a number that exist on the subject or object
being studied, but it covers all the characteristics or properties owned
by an object or subject (Sugiyono, 2013:115).
The population in this research is the users of Xiaomi smartphone
in MiForum in social media Facebook. The reason why the researcher
chooses this population because the researcher wants to know the
influence of e-WOM and e-SQ towards purchase intention of Xiaomi
smartphone users.
2. Sample
Sample is a member of the selected population using a specific
procedure that is expected to represent it‟s population. If there are a
huge population and researcher may not be capable to analyze the
whole existing population, for example, due to limited funds,
manpower, and or even time, so researcher can use samples drawn
from the population (Sugiyono, 2013: 116).
The sampling technique used in this research is purposive sampling
or sample intended subjectively. Purposive sampling is a sampling
technique with certain considerations (Sugiyono, 2013:122). Sampling
technique was based on the consideration that the respondents are
Xiaomi smartphone user who have been bought Xiaomi‟ product
54
through its online website and joined Xiaomi group called ”MiForum”.
The respondent is also obligate to own Facebook account.
Due to the number of population is not known exactly, so to
determine the size of the sample is used convenience sampling
technique. The researchers select by screening the existing
questionnaires, if these people are known. For instance, used sample
to do the estimation , we got (1- )% convinced that the error is not
exceed to the value, if the size of sample as big as n, whereby
2
(Riduwan and Akdon (2013:255). Whereby:
n = The number of sampel
Z = The size of confidence level with = 0,05 (size of
confidence
level is 95% which means Z ½. 95% = Z. 0,475 in the table
founded 1,96)
= Standard deviation
= Standard error or the error that can be tolerated (5% = 0,05)
By calculation:
2
( )( )
2 96,04
From the calculation, the number of sample that we got is 96.04, to
make it easier then we can make it be rounded to 100 respondents. So
this research use 100 respondents as research samples.
55
C. Data Collection Method
In the research, the researcher will collecting the data. Types of data
being used in this research are both of primary and secondary data
(Sugiyono, 2009:193).
1. Primary Data
To accomplished this research, the researcher will obtain the
primary data through distributing the electronic questionnaire to the
Xiaomi smart phone users in MiForum to got their identity and
opinioins. Based on Malhorta (2009), questionnaire is a formalized set
of questions to obtain information of the for respondents. Based on
(Sugiyono, 2013: 199), questionnaire is a technique of data collection
done by giving a set of questions or written statement to the respondent
to be answered. In the questionnaire, there are designed questions that
are directly related to the research problem, where the answers
obtained will be processed in order to answer the hypotheses that have
been made, and to assist in solving problems examined.
In the primary data collection with questionnaires, researcher used
a closed-ended question which is the form of a question with a range of
alternative options or answers to the respondent to know the
characteristics of the respondents. To gauge the level of interest in the
elements of electronic word-of-mouth and electronic service quality on
this research used Likert scale.
56
Likert scale used to measure attitudes, opinions and the perception
of a person or group of people about social phenomena (Riduwan and
Kuncoro, 2008:20). In Likert Scale, the scale provides opportunities to
the respondents to express their feelings in the form of agreement to a
statement. The statement provided a tiered, starting from the lowest to
the highest levels, with the following formula:
Table 3.1
Likert Scale
No Range Score
1 Strongly Disagree 1
2 Disagree 2
3 Neutral 3
4 Agree 4
5 Strongly Agree 5
Source: Sugiyono (2013:133)
2. Secondary Data
A secondary data collection technique is the study of
literature,which is studying how factors that affect consumer
preferences for products in various literature, including search data
from Internet sites (electronic library) and books relating to completed
research data. According to Malhotra (2009), data is collected for some
purpose other than the problem at hand. In the development of this
study research, techniques of taking secondary data will be used are:
a. Library Study, done for collecting the data with information
57
through reference books, journals, and other information which
suitable according to this study.
b. Website of Xiaomi Indonesia to take the information about the
company.
D. Analysis Data Method
Basically this research is a research conducted to answer a problem, in
this case is about is there significant influence between electronic word-of-
mouth and electronic service quality towards purchase intention study case
of Xiaomi smartphone users in MiForum. In this study, researcher used a
descriptive method. The descriptive approach used through the approach
of surveys or distributing the questionnaires.
In order to know the influence of electronic electronic word-of-mouth
and electronic service quality towards purchase intention, researcher will
conducting multiple linier regression that analyzed based on the assitance
of SPSS 20 software.
1. Data Quality Test
This stage is a stage that is very important and decisive. In this
stage the data is processed so it can be successfully concluded the
truth that can be used to address the issues raised in the study.
Methods of data analysis used in this study is by using multiple
linear regression analysis.
58
a. Validity Test
Validity test used to measure whether questionnaire is valid
or not. A questionnaire considered as valid if the question or
statement is able to reveal something that will be measured by
the questionnaire (Ghozali, 2013:52). According to Sugiyono
(2009), valid means the instrument can be used to measure
what should be measured. Valid indicates the degree of
precision of the data is actually happening on the object with
the data that can be collected by the researcher.
Significancy test conducted by comparinf the r-count value
(in Correlated Item-Total Correlation coloumn) and the t-table
(df= n-k), means is to comparing the r-count value and r-table
value for degree of freedom (df) = n-2 (in this case means total
of samples). A question or indicator considered as valid if r-count
> r-table and has positive value. But, if r-count < r-table, so the
question is considered as invalid and has negative value.
b. Reliability Test
Reliability is a tool to measure a questionnaire which is an
indicator of variables or constructs. A questionnaire considered
to be reliable if respondent‟ answers towards a questions are
consistent or stable over time. A vaariable considered as
reliable if the Cronbach Alpha > 0.70 (Ghozali, 2013:48).
Reliability test in this research used the formulation of
59
Cronbach Alpha, to know the reliability level of an instrument
from the three research variables if the result of reliability test
has alpha value > 0.70.
2. Classic Assumption Test
The purpose of classic assumption test is to see certain
assumptions about the behavior patterns of variables which known
as regression basic assumptions, namely:
a. Normality Test
Normality test aims to test whether the regression model of
dependent and independent variable have the normal
contribution or not. To conducting the normality test, we can
see the Normal Probability Plot. A good regression have a
normal distribution or close to normal. Normality can be
detected by looking at the spread of the data (points) on the
diagonal axis of the graph. There are two ways to detect
whether residual has a normal distribution or not is by
analyzing the graphs and statistical tests (Kolmogorov-
smirnov). Details explanation as follows (Ghozali, 2013:160):
1) Normality test by Graph
One the simple way to see the residual normality is
by looking at the histogram graph that comparing between
observation and distribution data that detected the normal
distribution. However, just by looking at the histogram this
60
can be misleading, especially to the small sample size.
More reliable method is to look at normal probability plots
comparing the cumulative distribution of the normal
distribution. The normal distribution will form a straight
diagonal line and residual plotting the data will be
compared with diagonal lines (Ghozali, 2013:160).
There are several ways to detect normality by see
the spread of the data (points) on the diagonal axis of the
graph. Basis for a decision in the normality test is:
(a) If the data is spread around the diagonal line and follow
the direction of the diagonal line, the regression meet the
assumption of normality (Ghozali, 2013:163).
(b) If the data spread far from the diagonal line and did not
follow directions or diagonal line, the regression model
did not meet the assumption of normality (Ghozali,
2013:163).
2) Normality by Statistical Test
Normality test by graphic can be misleading if not
carefully look at it. Therefore, it is recommended to
complete normality test graph with statistical normality test
(Ghozali, 2013:163). Beside seeing the normal curve P-
plot, the normality test can also be performed by using
61
Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. In Kolmogorov Smirnov test the
hypothesis that apply are:
H0 = Samples derived from data or population that normal
distributed
Ha = Samples drived from data or populations that are not
normally distributed.
In this test, if sig. Value < 0.05, means the data is
not normally distributed. But, if sig.value > 0.05, so the
data is normally distributed (Santoso, 2012:193-196)
b. Multicollinearity Test
According to Ghozali (2013:105) multicolinearity used to
prove there is linear correlation among independent variable in
regression model. A good regression model should not be a
correlation between the independent variables. If independent
variable creates the perfect correlation, means these variables
are not orthogonal. Orthogonal variable means independent
variable that have corellation value equals to zero. To detect the
presence or absence multicollinearity in the regression model
are as follows:
1) The value of R2 generated by an empirical regression
model estimate is very high, but individually
independent variables were not significantly affect the
dependent variable
62
2) Analyze the correlation matrix of the independent
variables. If correlation between the independent
variables are quite high (generally above 0.90), then this
is an indication of multicollinearity. The absence of a
high correlation between the independent variable does
not mean free from multicollinearity. Multicolinearity
may be due to the combined effect of two or more
independent variables
3) Multicolinearity can also be seen from:
(a) The value of tolerance and the opponent
(b) Variance inflation factor (VIF). Both these
measurements indicate each independent variable
explained by which independent variables. In simple
terms each independent variable to be dependent
variable and regressed against the others
independent variables. Tolerance measures the
variability of independent variables chosen that are
not explained by other independent variable. So a
low tolerance value equal to the value of a high VIF
(because VIF = 1 / Tolerance). Value cutoff
commonly used to indicate the presence of
multicollinearity is the tolerance value ≤ 0.10 or
equal to VIF value ≥10 (Ghazali, 2013:105-106).
63
c. Heteroscedasticity Test
According to Ghozali (2013:139), heteroscedasticity test
aims to test whether the regression model occurred inequality
residual variance from one observation to another observation
are remains, it is called homoscedasticity and if different, then
called heteroscedasticity. A good regression model is
homoscedasticity or did not happen heteroscedasticity. Most of
the data crossection containing heteroscedasticity because this
data collect representing a variety of sizes (small, medium and
large). There are several ways to detect the presence or absence
of heteroscedasticity. In this research is see Graph Plot between
the predicted value of the dependent variable which is ZPRED
with its residual SRESID. Detection of the presence or absence
of heteroscedasticity can be done by looking at whether there is
a specific pattern on a scatterplot graph between SRESID and
ZPRED. With the analysis if there is a certain regular pattern
(wavy, widened and then narrowed), then identifying
heteroscedasticity has occurred and if there is no clear pattern,
such as as the points spread above and below the number 0 on
the Y axis, then there is no heteroscedasticity (Ghozali,
2013:139).
64
3. Multiple Linear Regression
This research use Multiple Linier Regression. Multiple
linear regression analysis was used as a tool to determine how
much change in the value of the dependent variable, if value of the
independent variables are manipulated or permuted (Sugiyono,
2005: 211). A mathematical formula of linear regression is
commonly used in the study are as follows:
Y = a + β1X1 +β2X2 +e
Whereby :
Y = Purchase intention (dependent variable)
a = constanta
β1 = regression coefficient of X1
β2 = regression coefficient of X2
X1 = electronic word-of-mouth (independent variable)
X2 = electronic service quality (independent variable)
e = Error
4. The Coefficient of determination Test (R )
According to Ghozali (2013:97) the coefficient of
determination (R²) essentially measure how far the ability of
models to explain variation in the dependent variable. The value
determination of coefficient is between zero and one. The R² is
small means that the ability of independent variables in explaining
variations in the dependent variable is very limited.
65
Basic weaknesses use the coefficient of determination is
based on the number of independent variables entered into the
model. Each additional one independent variable, then R2
would
increase, no matter whether these variables affect the dependent
variable is not.
5. Theoritical Hypothesis Test
a. T-test (Partial Test)
Partial test or T-test aims to determine how big the
influence of each independent variable (X) individually toward
dependent variable (Y) (Ghozali, 2013:98). The probability is
smaller than 0.05, then the result means that there is significant
independent variables individually influence on the dependent
variable.
1) If -t table < t test < +t table, then Ho is rejected and
Ha is accepted, it means there is significant
influence between independent variable toward
dependent variable
2) If t test > t table or -t test < -t table, then Ho is
accepted and Ha is rejected, it means there is no
significant influence between independent variable
toward dependent variable
Ho: there is no significant influence between
electronic word-of-mouth through social media
66
Facebook and electronic service quality toward
purchase intention
Ha: there is significant influence between electronic
word-of-mouth through social media Facebook and
electronic service quality toward purchase intention
The criteria to making decision (significance)
with α = 0,05;
(a) If probability > α 0.05, so Ho accept. It
means
there is no significant influence between electronic
word-of-mouth through social media Facebook and
electronic service quality toward purchase intention
(b) If probability < α 0.05, so Ho reject. It
means there is significant influence between
electronic word-of-mouth through social media
Facebook and electronic service quality toward
purchase intention
b. F-Test (Simultaneous Test)
F Test basically indicates whether all the independent
variables included in the model have simultaneously influence
the dependent variable (Ghozali, 2013:98). These steps are
applied to examine the hypothesis with F Test is as follows:
67
1) Determine Ho and Ha
Ho: β1, β2 = 0, this means there is no significant
influence between independent variable and dependent
variable.
Ho: β1, β2 ≠ 0, this means there is significant influence
between independent variable and dependent variable.
(a) Determining level of significance
Level of significant level used is 5% or α = 0.05
(b) Determining the criteria acceptance and reject of
Ho
If probability < 0, 05 reject Ho
If probability > 0, 05 accept Ho
If F test > F table, so Ho is rejected and Ha is
accepted; this means independent variable together
have significant influence to dependent variable.
If F test < F table, so Ho is accepted and Ha is
rejected; this means independent variable together
do not have significant influence to dependent
variable (Ghozali 2013:98)
68
E. Research Operational Variable
Variable is anything that is an object, event, act, characteristic,
trait, or attribute of observation in research and concepts that can be
measured and to which assigned categorical values (Cooper, 2006). The
variable in this research consist of independent variable and dependent
variable, which are:
1. Independent Variable
According to Cooper (2006:63), independent variable is the
variable manipulated by the researcher that gives influence or the
causal of the changes happen or the effect from dependent variable. In
this research asthe independent variables are electronic word-of-mouth
(X1) andelectronic service quality (X2).
2. Dependent Variable
According to Cooper (2006:63), dependent variable is the variable
measured, predicted, or otherwise monitored by researcher; expected
to be affected by manipulation of independent variable. The dependent
variable of this research is purchase intention (Y).
69
Table 3.2
Operational Variable
Variable Dimension Indicator Scale
Electronic
Word-of-Mouth
e-WOM Quality
(Horrison-Walker2001)
1. The online review should be
understandable
2. The online review is helpful
3. The online review is credible
4. In general, the quality of
each online review is high
Likert
e-WOM Quantity
(Godes & Mayzlin,
2004)
5. More reviews represent
higher product popularity
6. Reading numerous review
will reduce customer anxiety
when making purchase
7. Highly recommendation
represent that the product
has good reputation
8. The numbers of reviewers
influenced customer in
deciding to buy the product
Likert
Sender‟s Expertise
(Hu, Liu, & Zhang,
2008)
9. The reviewers have a well
product knowledge
10. Thereviewersareexperienced
11. The reviewers able to giving
judgement on something
objectively
12. Sender‟s expertise make
Likert
70
customers more confident in
making purchase
Electronic Service
Quality
Reliability
(Zeithaml,Parasuraman
& Malhotra, 2000)
13. The website able to perform
its promised service
dependability
14. Website always available
15. Website functioning
properly
16. Website are ease to use
17. Information accuracy
18. Company being truthful
about its offering
Likert
Website Design
(Wolfinbarger and
Gilly, 2003)
19. Appealling and well-
organized website
20. Consistent and standardized
navigation
21. Clear information provided
Likert
Security
(Ho and Lee, 2007)
22. Protect the personal data of
customers
23. Protect the financial data of
customers
24. Shows obvious terms on
payment and delivery
25. Have good reputation in
customer‟s mind
Likert
Empathy
(Madu and Madu,
2002)
26. Provide customer individual
attention
27. Show understanding of
customer‟s needs
Likert
71
28. Consistently courteous
29. Give adequate contacts
information
30. Address complaints friendly
Responsiveness
(Zeithaml,Parasuraman
& Malhotra, 2000)
31. Prompt response to customer
32. Quickly solve problem
33. Give adequate response time
Likert
Purchase Intention
(Schiffman and
Kanuk, 2000)
34. The customer have the
interest in seeking
information regarding the
product
35. Customer‟s willingness to
try the product
36. Customer consider to buy
the product due to its value
and benefits offered
37. Customer have the
willingness to own the
product
Likert
72
CHAPTER IV
ANALYSIS
A. General Overview
Xiaomi was founded in April 6th
2010 by a serial entrepreneur Lei
Jun, who is one of China‟s top 20 richest person with net worth
US$9.1 billion according to Forbes (Olson, 2014). It crafted smartphone
hardware, software, and internet services as well as accessories with the
help of smart and talented people hired from Google, Kingsoft, Microsoft,
Motorola, Yahoo, and other successful technology companies around the
globe.
Xiaomi has sold more than 60 million smartphones worldwide in
2014, with more than 18 million handsets in China alone, resulting in
US$12 billion revenue. Their presence is mainly in the Asian region
such as China, Malaysia, Singapore, and Philippines. Xiaomi‟s focus is
to produce reliable, user friendly, mobile applications and affordable
phones to customers. Xiaomi is currently the third largest smartphone
producer in the world with over 8,000 employees worldwide. In
December 2014, Xiaomi has achieved the status of the most valuable
technology start-up in the world after it successfully secured US$1.1
billion investment with a company valuation of US$45 billion (Shih,
2015).
73
B. Xiaomi Logo
The “MI" in Xiaomi logo stands for “Mobile Internet”. It also has
other meanings, including "Mission Impossible" (Xiaomi Team, 2016).
Figure 4.1
Xiaomi Logo
Source: www.mi.com/id/
C. Xiaomi Mission Statement
Xiaomi has had an exciting, and lucrative, start since its founding in
2010. In over four years, the company has become the third largest
smartphone distributor in the world and has grown to be the world‟s most
valuable technology start-up; it is currently valued at around $46 Billion.
Xiaomi is primarily known as a hardware company, but its leaders claim
that the company is more of an internet and software company
(Porciuncula and Martinez, 2015). The company‟s mission statement is as
follows:
1. A premium product
Xiaomi ensures that its products not only meet market
industry standards but also exceeds them. The products they make
74
can compete with any of the higher end brands that competitors
offer
2. Lowest prices
The focus on producing great products is matched only by
the emphasis on providing products at incredibly low prices that
normally wouldn‟t be offered for such premium items
3. More than just hardware
Xiaomi envisions itself as an internet and software
company above all else. The company wants to bring the internet,
and all its uses, to markets where smartphones are only just starting
to flourish (Porciuncula and Martinez, 2015).
D. Xiaomi Product
Xiaomi makes many products. Not only mobile phone, but it also
produce smart TV line, network router, notebook, tablet, set-top box,
cloud storage service, messaging service, external battery or usually called
as power bank, fittness monitor & sleep tracker, until smartbrands and
smartwatches. Besides of that, Xiaomi also have smart home products,
such as blood pressure monitor, air purifier, Yi smart webcam, Yi action
camera, smart scale, water purifier, smart home kit, smart rice cooker,
robotic vacuum, and the drones.
75
E. Xiaomi Business Strategy
1. Online Sales Method/Flash Sales
When major smartphone companies like Apple, Samsung, and
OPPO sell their products through third-party retailers and physical
stores, whereas Xiaomi sells all its products online. Xiaomi has created
a business model around selling the majority of its products online
through a method called “Flash Sales.” These flash sales are basically
limited batches of products that go on sale at specific time and run till
they are sold out. This direct to consumer method also allows Xiaomi
to increase profits by avoiding the fees that come with having retailers
sell its products in-store. This method is perfect for Xiaomi, as it
prevents the company from overproducing phones that it might not
sell. By limiting its manufacturing, Xiaomi has a smaller inventory that
provides less risk and easier mobility. Since Xiaomi builds its phones
in batches, the company saves money on the decreasing costs of
materials as time goes on instead paying for large, expensive quantities
up front. The online business model is made all the more successful by
the methods in which the company upgrades and updates its hardware
and software (Porciuncula and Martinez, 2015).
2. Weekly Update System / High User Input:
The most innovative part of the Xiaomi business model, and what
sets it completely apart from any other major competitor, is its weekly
system of phone updates that uses user feedback forums to determine
76
what needs to be fixed and improved. Essentially, once Xiaomi has
released a product into the market, the company allows and encourages
its users to give recommendations on how to improve the product‟s
hardware or software. The company then releases new software
patches every week that reflect user requests. Incredibly, the company
does take hardware recommendations seriously and, if enough people
request a certain update, the company will incorporate the minor
hardware updates to its future phone batches. This rapidly-executed
updating system is completely against the yearly OS updates that other
major smartphones provide and is a huge factor in Xiaomi‟s success.
The company prides itself on providing what its users want, and not
what they think they want. This unique model is a big draw because it
gives users a lot of power they normally would not have, and it also
allows Xiaomi an opportunity to know exactly what its users want
(Porciuncula and Martinez, 2015).
F. Xiaomi Pricing Strategy
Xiaomi sells its products online, through e-commerce. This ensures
that it doesn‟t have to worry about the costs of warehousing and
distribution. Hugo Barra, the vice president of Xiaomi said, “We are
an e-commerce company. We live on the internet. We are selling
exclusively through e-commerce. And the price can be much lower,
because the price on e-commerce is essentially fulfillment and
77
shipping cost” (Miuios team, 2016). Xiaomi also shuns traditional
models of advertising and depends solely on Social Media marketing
and word-of-mouth. Beside of that, unlike other bigger players who
discontinue their models after 6-8 months in the market, Xiaomi sells it
products for up to 18-20 months after launch. This means, in
accordance with Moore Law, the price of the individual components
go down while the price of the phone remains constant throughout. But
the most important thing to note is that Xiaomi is a „mobile internet
company‟. It is looking to make money, not on its hardware, but by
selling apps, games and special Android themes and Internet services
on top of its custom MIUI. This Xiaomi‟ pricing strategy very
welladopted by the e-commerce behemoth Amazon (Miuios team,
2016).
G. Validity and Reliability Test
1. Validity Test Result
According to Arikunto (2010: 211) validity is a measurement that
indicates validity levels of an instrument. An instrument can be
considered as a valid instrument if the validity level of particular
instrument is high, while an instrument can be acknowledge as an
invalid instrument if the validity level of the instrument is low. To get
the primary data, the researcher distribute electronic questionnaire to
the respondents. The respondents in this research refers to Xiaomi
78
users in MiForum who own Facebook account and have been bought
Xiaomi‟ product through its online website . A question considered as
valid if the value of each question or r-count is positive and greater than
r-table. In this research the researcher use 30 respondents as a sample
to assess the validity of all the questions. Regarding the
formulation, researcher use formulation of df = n-2, so 30-2 = 28 and
got the value of 0.361 as r-table.
Meanwhile, reliability test used to test the consistency of data in a
certain period of time and the extent to which a scale produces
consistent result if repeated measurements are made on the
characteristic. The value of variable reliability demonstrated by the
Cronbach Alpha coefficient. A variable is said to be the Alpha
Cronbach coefficient of Reliability when > 0.70, means that this
instrument can be used as a reliable data collector with relative
measurement result if repeated measurements are made. In the other
word, we can say that this reliability test purposes to see the data
consistency (Ghozali, 2013:48).
Before the electronic questionnaire ditributes to 100 respondents,
researcher conducted pra-survey towards 30 respondents by giving the
37 questions to test the validity and reliability from the overall
questions given. The table below shows the output of validity and
reliability test of each variable of electronic word of mouth (X1),
electronic service quality (X2), and purchase intention (Y).
79
Table 4.1
Validity Test Result
Questions r-count r-table Result
e-Word-of-Mouth
e-WOM Quality 1 0.882 0.361 Valid
e-WOM Quality 2 0.819 0.361 Valid
e-WOM Quality 3 0.855 0.361 Valid
e-WOM Quality 4 0.877 0.361 Valid
e-WOM Quantity 1 0.796 0.361 Valid
e-WOM Quantity 2 0.677 0.361 Valid
e-WOM Quantity 3 0.772 0.361 Valid
e-WOM Quantity 4 0.768 0.361 Valid
e-WOM Sender' Expertise 1 0.820 0.361 Valid
e-WOM Sender' Expertise 2 0.779 0.361 Valid
e-WOM Sender' Expertise 3 0.798 0.361 Valid
e-WOM Sender' Expertise 4 0.841 0.361 Valid
e-Service Quality
e-SQ Reliability 1 0.720 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Reliability 2 0.708 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Reliability 3 0.847 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Reliability 4 0.855 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Reliability 5 0.761 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Reliability 6 0.787 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Website Design 1 0.858 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Website Design 2 0.846 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Website Design 3 0.829 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Security 1 0.832 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Security 2 0.807 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Security 3 0.846 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Security 4 0.787 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Empathy 1 0.495 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Empathy 2 0.675 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Empathy 3 0.751 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Empathy 4 0.680 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Empathy 5 0.583 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Responsiveness 1 0.713 0.361 Valid
80
e-SQ Responsiveness 2 0.818 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Responsiveness 3 0.749 0.361 Valid
Purchase Intention
Purchase Intention 1 0.889 0.361 Valid
Purchase Intention 2 0.907 0.361 Valid
Purchase Intention 3 0.952 0.361 Valid
Purchase Intention 4 0.935 0.361 Valid
Source: Processed Primary Data by SPSS 20, 2016
Based on table 4.1, we can concluded that 37 questions that given
to the 30 respondents are valid, because the r-count > r-table. Whereas,
for the reliability test result can be seen as below:
2. Reliability Test Result
Table 4.2
Reliability Test Result
Source: Processed Primary Data by SPSS 20, 2016
A
c
cording to the table 4.2, noted that the value of Cronbach‟s Alpha of
all variables are greater than 0.70. So it can be summed up that all
variables used in this study are reliable.
H. Descriptive Analysis of Respondent Answer
Descriptive analysis of the answer of respondents is aim to identified
the frequency of each answer towards the variable instruments, which are
electronic word-of-mouth and service quality. There are 100 respondents
Variable Cronbach’s Alpha N of item Result
Electronic word-
of-mouth
0.951 12 Reliable
Electronic service
quality
0.962 21 Reliable
Purchase intention 0.938 4 Reliable
81
with several characteristics such as the respondents obligate to own
facebook account, they are Xiaomi users who have been bought Xiaomi
through its online website. The demographic classification characteristics
of the respondents can be described as follows:
a. Total of respondents based on gender
Table 4.3
Respondents Based on Gender
From the table above, there are 100 respondents who are Xiaomi
users, consist of 43 people or 43% are males and 65 people or 65% are
females respondents. So it is indicates that most of Xiaomi isers are
females.
Gender
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
Male 43 43,0 43,0 43,0
Female 57 57,0 57,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
82
b. Total of respondents based on age
Table 4.4
Total of Respondents Based on Age
Age
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
<20 10 10,0 10,0 10,0
20-<35 89 89,0 89,0 99,0
35-<50 1 1,0 1,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
Source: Primary data output from SPSS 20
Table 4.4 above shows that 100 respondents consist of 10 people
aged < 20, 89 people aged between 20 - < 35, and 1 person aged between
35 - < 50. So it is indicates that most of Xiaomi users aged between 20
until under 35 years old.
c. Descriptive Analysis Discussion
In order to know the feedback given by 100 respondents in each
variable of electronic word-of-mouth, electronic service quality, and
purchase intention, so the percentage description of respondent‟
feedback then being analyzed. The respondents are ask to answer 37
the following statement:
1.) Electronic Word-of-Mouth Description
a.) Online review in social media Facebook is understandable
83
Table 4.5
Source: Primary data output from SPSS 20
Table 4.5 shows that 5% strongly diagrees, 5% disagrees, 27%
neutrals, 56% agrees, and 7% strongly agrees. Then it can be concluded that the
majority of respondents agree that the online review in Facebook is
understandable.
b.) Online review is helpful
Table 4.6
Source: Primary data output from SPSS 20
Table 4.6 shows that 1% strongly diagrees, 5% disagrees, 24%
neutrals, 57% agrees, and 13% strongly agrees. Then it can be concluded that the
majority of respondents agree that the online review is helpful.
Question 1
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
Strongly Disagree 5 5,0 5,0 5,0
Disagree 5 5,0 5,0 10,0
Neutral 27 27,0 27,0 37,0
Agree 56 56,0 56,0 93,0
Strongly Agree 7 7,0 7,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
Question 2
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
Strongly Disagree 1 1,0 1,0 1,0
Disagree 5 5,0 5,0 6,0
Neutral 24 24,0 24,0 30,0
Agree 57 57,0 57,0 87,0
Strongly Agree 13 13,0 13,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
84
c.) The online review has the credibility
Table 4.7 Question 3
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
Strongly Disagree 1 1,0 1,0 1,0
Disagree 7 7,0 7,0 8,0
Neutral 34 34,0 34,0 42,0
Agree 51 51,0 51,0 93,0
Strongly Agree 7 7,0 7,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
Source: Primary data output from SPSS 20
Table 4.7 shows that 1% strongly diagrees, 7% disagrees, 34%
neutrals, 51% agrees, and 7% strongly agrees. Then it can be concluded that the
majority of respondents agree that the online review has the credibility.
d.) In general, the reviewer gave a high quality of review
Table 4.8
Source: Primary data output from SPSS 20
Table 4.8 shows that 4% strongly diagrees, 12% disagrees, 38% neutrals,
39% agrees, and 7% strongly agrees. Then it can be concluded that the majority of
respondents feels neutral that the reviewer gave a high quality of review
Question 4
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
Strongly Disagree 4 4,0 4,0 4,0
Disagree 12 12,0 12,0 16,0
Neutral 38 38,0 38,0 54,0
Agree 39 39,0 39,0 93,0
Strongly Agree 7 7,0 7,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
85
e.) More reviews represent higher product popularity
Table 4.9 Question 5
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
Disagree 6 6,0 6,0 6,0
Neutral 23 23,0 23,0 29,0
Agree 61 61,0 61,0 90,0
Strongly Agree 10 10,0 10,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
Source: Primary data output from SPSS 20
Table 4.9 shows that 6% disagrees, 23% neutrals, 61% agrees, and 10%
strongly agrees. Then it can be concluded that the majority of respondents agree
that more reviews represent higher product popularity
f.) Reading numerous reviews by others reduce customer‟
anxiety
Table 4.10
Source: Primary data output from SPSS 20
Table 4.10 shows that 6% disagrees, 33% neutrals, 49% agrees, and 12%
strongly agrees. Then it can be concluded that the majority of respondents agree
that reading numerous reviews by others reduce customer‟ anxiety
Question 6
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
Disagree 6 6,0 6,0 6,0
Neutral 33 33,0 33,0 39,0
Agree 49 49,0 49,0 88,0
Strongly Disagree 12 12,0 12,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
86
g.) More reviews inferring that the product has good reputation
Table 4.11 Question 7
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
Strongly Disagree 1 1,0 1,0 1,0
Disagree 2 2,0 2,0 3,0
Neutral 22 22,0 22,0 25,0
Agree 54 54,0 54,0 79,0
Strongly Agree 21 21,0 21,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
Source: Primary data output from SPSS 20
Table 4.11 shows 1% strongly diagrees, 2% disagrees, 22% neutrals, 54%
agrees, and 21% strongly agrees. So it can be concluded the majority of
respondents agrees that more reviews shows that the product has good reputation
h.) Number of reviews influence customer in deciding to buy
Table 4.12
Question 8
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
Strongly Disagree 1 1,0 1,0 1,0
Disagree 7 7,0 7,0 8,0
Neutral 22 22,0 22,0 30,0
Agree 56 56,0 56,0 86,0
Strongly Agree 14 14,0 14,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
Source: Primary data output from SPSS 20
Table 4.12 shows 1% strongly diagrees, 7% disagrees, 22% neutrals, 56%
agrees, and 14% strongly agrees. So it can be concluded the majority of
respondents agrees that number of reviews influence customer deciding to buy
87
i.) Reviewers have a well product knowledge
Table 4.13
Question 9
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
Disagree 6 6,0 6,0 6,0
Neutral 26 26,0 26,0 32,0
Agree 59 59,0 59,0 91,0
Strongly Agree 9 9,0 9,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
Source: Primary data output from SPSS 20
Table 4.13 shows 6% disagrees, 26% neutrals, 59% agrees, and 9%
strongly agrees. So it can be concluded the majority of respondents agrees that the
reviewers have a well product knowledge
j.) The reviewers are experienced
Table 4.14
Question 10
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
Disagree 8 8,0 8,0 8,0
Neutral 30 30,0 30,0 38,0
Agree 55 55,0 55,0 93,0
Strongly Agree 7 7,0 7,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
Source: Primary data output from SPSS 20
Table 4.14 shows 8% disagrees, 30% neutrals, 55% agrees, and 7%
strongly agrees. So it can be concluded the majority of respondents agrees that the
reviewers are experienced
88
k.) The reviewers able to giving judgement on something
objectively
Table 4.15
Question 11
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
Strongly disagee 1 1,0 1,0 1,0
disagree 9 9,0 9,0 10,0
neutral 30 30,0 30,0 40,0
agree 50 50,0 50,0 90,0
strongly agree 10 10,0 10,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
Source: Primary data output from SPSS 20
Table 4.15 shows 1% strongly disagrees, 9% disagrees, 30% neutrals, 50%
agrees, and 10% strongly agrees. So it can be concluded the majority of
respondents agrees that the reviewers able to giving judgement on something
objectively
l.) Sender‟s expertise make customers more confident in making
purchases
Table 4.16
Question 12
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
Stongly Disagree 1 1,0 1,0 1,0
Disagree 3 3,0 3,0 4,0
Neutral 26 26,0 26,0 30,0
Agree 55 55,0 55,0 85,0
Strongly Agree 15 15,0 15,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
Source: Primary data output from SPSS 20
89
Table 4.16 shows 1% strongly disagrees, 3% disagrees, 26% neutrals, 55%
agrees, and 15% strongly agrees. So it can be concluded the majority of
respondents agrees that sender‟s expertise make customers more confident in
making purchases
2.) Electronic Service Quality Description
a.) The company able to perform its promised service
dependability
Table 4. 17
Source: Primary data output from SPSS 20
Table 4.17 shows 2% disagrees, 37% neutrals, 53% agrees, and 8%
strongly agrees. So it can be concluded the majority of respondents agrees that the
company able to perform its promised service dependability
Question 13
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
Disagree 2 2,0 2,0 2,0
Neutral 37 37,0 37,0 39,0
Agree 53 53,0 53,0 92,0
Strongly Agree 8 8,0 8,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
90
b.) Website always available
Table 4.18
Source: Primary data output from SPSS 20
Table 4.18 shows 6% disagrees, 31% neutrals, 51% agrees, and 12%
strongly agrees. So it can be concluded the majority of respondents agrees that the
Xiaomi‟ website is always available
c.) Website functioning properly
Table 4.19
Question 15
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
disagree 6 6,0 6,0 6,0
neutral 25 25,0 25,0 31,0
agree 59 59,0 59,0 90,0
strongly agree 10 10,0 10,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
Source: Primary data output from SPSS 20
Table 4.19 shows 6% disagrees, 25% neutrals, 59% agrees, and 10%
strongly agrees. So it can be concluded the majority of respondents agrees that the
Website functioning properly
Question 14
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
Disagree 6 6,0 6,0 6,0
Neutral 31 31,0 31,0 37,0
Agree 51 51,0 51,0 88,0
Strongly Agree 12 12,0 12,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
91
d.) Website are ease to use
Table 4.20
Source: Primary data output from SPSS 20
Table 4.20 shows 3% disagrees, 33% neutrals, 54% agrees, and 10%
strongly agrees. So it can be concluded the majority of respondents agrees that the
website are ease to use
e.) Information accuracy
Table 4.21
Question 17
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
disagree 3 3,0 3,0 3,0
neutral 48 48,0 48,0 51,0
agree 42 42,0 42,0 93,0
stronglgy agree 7 7,0 7,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
Source: Primary data output from SPSS 20
Table 4.21 shows 3% disagrees, 48% neutrals, 42% agrees, and 7%
strongly agrees. In this case, the majority of respondents (51%) feels that the
Xiaomi website did not give an information accuracy. Therefore, Xiaomi should
Question 16
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
disagree 3 3,0 3,0 3,0
neutral 33 33,0 33,0 36,0
agree 54 54,0 54,0 90,0
strongly agree 10 10,0 10,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
92
immediately take action to deal with this problem by examine the level of
professionalism of the entire website. Provide clear, accurate, and consice
informations so that customers can easily understand. And avoid misspelling and
grammatical errors of the website is also one of necessity.
f.) Company being truthful about its offering
Table 4.22
Source: Primary data output from SPSS 20
Table 4.22 shows 2% disagrees, 30% neutrals, 61% agrees, and 7%
strongly agrees. So it can be concluded the majority of respondents agrees that the
company being truthful about its offering
g.) Appealing and well-organized website
Tabel 4.23
Question 19
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
strongly disagree 1 1,0 1,0 1,0
disagree 5 5,0 5,0 6,0
neutral 31 31,0 31,0 37,0
agree 53 53,0 53,0 90,0
strongly agree 10 10,0 10,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
Question 18
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
disagree 2 2,0 2,0 2,0
neutral 30 30,0 30,0 32,0
agree 61 61,0 61,0 93,0
strongy agree 7 7,0 7,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
93
Source: Primary data output from SPSS 20
Table 4.23 shows 1% strongly disagree, 5% disagrees, 31% neutrals, 53%
agrees, and 10% strongly agrees. So it can be concluded the majority of
respondents agrees that the website is well-organized
h.) Consistent and standardized navigation
Table 4.24
Question 20
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
Strongly disagree 1 1,0 1,0 1,0
disagree 6 6,0 6,0 7,0
neutral 25 25,0 25,0 32,0
agree 60 60,0 60,0 92,0
strongly agree 8 8,0 8,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
Source: Primary output from SPSS 20
Table 4.24 shows 1% strongly disagree, 6% disagrees, 25% neutrals, 60%
agrees, and 8% strongly agrees. So it can be concluded the majority of
respondents agrees that the website has a consistent and standardized navigation
94
i.) Clear information provided
Table 4.25
Question 21
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
strongly
disagree 1 1,0 1,0 1,0
disagree 8 8,0 8,0 9,0
neutral 29 29,0 29,0 38,0
agree 50 50,0 50,0 88,0
strongly agree 12 12,0 12,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
Source: Primary data output from SPSS 20
Table 4.25 shows 1% strongly disagree, 8% disagrees, 29% neutrals, 50%
agrees, and 12% strongly agrees. So it can be concluded the majority of
respondents agrees that the website provide clear information
j.) Protect the personal data of customers
Table 4.26
Question 22
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
strongly disagree 2 2,0 2,0 2,0
disagree 5 5,0 5,0 7,0
neutral 29 29,0 29,0 36,0
agree 52 52,0 52,0 88,0
strongly agree 12 12,0 12,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
Source: Primary data output from SPSS 20
95
Table 4.26 shows 2% strongly disagree, 5% disagrees, 29% neutrals, 52%
agrees, and 12% strongly agrees. So it can be concluded the majority of
respondents agrees that the website protect customer personal data
k.) Protect the financial data of customers
Table 4. 27
Question 23
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
strongly disagree 1 1,0 1,0 1,0
disagree 2 2,0 2,0 3,0
neutral 36 36,0 36,0 39,0
agree 53 53,0 53,0 92,0
strongly agree 8 8,0 8,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
Source: Primary data output from SPSS 20
Table 4.27 shows 1% strongly disagree, 2% disagrees, 36% neutrals, 53%
agrees, and 8% strongly agrees. So it can be concluded the majority of
respondents agrees that the website protect customer financial data
l.) Show obvious terms on payment and delivery
Table 4.28
Source: Primary data output from SPSS 20
Question 24
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
strongly disagree 1 1,0 1,0 1,0
disagree 2 2,0 2,0 3,0
neutral 24 24,0 24,0 27,0
agree 62 62,0 62,0 89,0
strongly agree 11 11,0 11,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
96
Table 4.28 shows 1% strongly disagree, 2% disagrees, 24% neutrals, 62%
agrees, and 11% strongly agrees. So it can be concluded the majority of
respondents agrees that the website show obvious terms on payment and delivery
m.) Have a good reputation in customer‟s mind
Table 4.29
Question 25
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
strongly disagree 1 1,0 1,0 1,0
disagree 2 2,0 2,0 3,0
neural 23 23,0 23,0 26,0
agree 65 65,0 65,0 91,0
strongly agree 9 9,0 9,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
Source: Primary data output from SPSS 20
Table 4.29 shows 1% strongly disagree, 2% disagrees, 23% neutrals, 65%
agrees, and 9% strongly agrees. So it can be concluded the majority of
respondents agrees that the website have a good reputation in customer‟s mind
n.) Provide customer individual attention
Table 4.30
Source: Primary data output from SPSS 20
Question 26
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
strongly disagree 1 1,0 1,0 1,0
disagree 3 3,0 3,0 4,0
neutral 35 35,0 35,0 39,0
agree 54 54,0 54,0 93,0
strongly agree 7 7,0 7,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
97
Table 4.30 shows 1% strongly disagree, 3% disagrees, 35% neutrals, 54%
agrees, and 7% strongly agrees. So it can be concluded the majority of
respondents agrees that the website provide customer individual attention
o.) Show understanding of customer‟s need
Table 4. 31
Source: Primary data output from SPSS 20
Table 4.31 shows 1% strongly disagree, 3% disagrees, 32% neutrals, 57%
agrees, and 7% strongly agrees. So it can be concluded the majority of
respondents agrees that the admin show understanding of customer‟s need
p.) Consistently courteous
Table 4.32
Question 27
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
strongly disagree 1 1,0 1,0 1,0
disagree 3 3,0 3,0 4,0
neutral 32 32,0 32,0 36,0
agree 57 57,0 57,0 93,0
strongly agree 7 7,0 7,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
Question 28
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
strongly disagree 1 1,0 1,0 1,0
disagree 3 3,0 3,0 4,0
neutral 34 34,0 34,0 38,0
agree 53 53,0 53,0 91,0
strongly agree 9 9,0 9,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
98
Source: Primary data output from SPSS 20
Table 4.32 shows 1% strongly disagree, 3% disagrees, 34% neutrals, 53%
agrees, and 9% strongly agrees. So it can be concluded the majority of
respondents agrees that the admin is consistently courteous
q.) Give adequate contacts information
Table 4.33
Question 29
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
strongly disagree 1 1,0 1,0 1,0
disagree 2 2,0 2,0 3,0
neutral 30 30,0 30,0 33,0
agree 58 58,0 58,0 91,0
strongly agree 9 9,0 9,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
Source: Primary data output from SPSS 20
Table 4.33 shows 1% strongly disagree, 2% disagrees, 30% neutrals, 58%
agrees, and 9% strongly agrees. So it can be concluded the majority of
respondents agrees that the admin give adequate contacts information
r.) Address complaints friendly
Table 4.34
Question 30
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
disagree 3 3,0 3,0 3,0
neural 35 35,0 35,0 38,0
agree 50 50,0 50,0 88,0
strongly agree 12 12,0 12,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
Source: Primary data output from SPSS 20
99
Table 4.34 shows 3% disagrees, 35% neutrals, 50% agrees, and 12%
strongly agrees. So it can be concluded the majority of respondents agrees that the
admin address complaints friendly
s.) Prompt response to customer
Table 4.35
Source: Primary data output from SPSS 20
Table 4.35 shows 10% disagrees, 42% neutrals, 36% agrees, and 12%
strongly agrees. So it can be concluded that large number of respondents (52%)
did not feels that the admin give prompt response to customer. Therefore, Xiaomi
should immediately take action to deal with this problem by ensuring that Xiaomi‟
employees serve customers with excellences. Always prioritized to give great
service for the customers because for every business, customer is always number
one. The admin should be responsive and give prompt reply to help avoid the
customers losing interest.
Question 31
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
disagree 10 10,0 10,0 10,0
neutral 42 42,0 42,0 52,0
agree 36 36,0 36,0 88,0
strongly agree 12 12,0 12,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
100
t.) Quickly solve problem
Table 4.36
Question 32
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
strongly disagree 1 1,0 1,0 1,0
disagree 6 6,0 6,0 7,0
neutral 36 36,0 36,0 43,0
agree 46 46,0 46,0 89,0
strongly agree 11 11,0 11,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
Source: Primary data process, 2016
Table 4.36 shows 1% strongly disagree, 6% disagrees, 36% neutrals, 46%
agrees, and 11% strongly agrees. So it can be concluded the majority of
respondents agrees that the admin quickly solve problem
u.) Give adequate response time
Table 4.37
Source: Primary data output from SPSS 20
Table 4.37 shows 8% disagrees, 42% neutrals, 41% agrees, and 9%
strongly agrees. So it can be concluded the majority of respondents agrees that the
admin give adequate response time. In this case, the majority of respondents
Question 33
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
V
a
l
i
d
disagree 8 8,0 8,0 8,0
neutral 42 42,0 42,0 50,0
agree 41 41,0 41,0 91,0
strongly agree 9 9,0 9,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
101
(50%) feels that the admin did not give adequate response time. To overcome this
problems, Xiaomi should ensuring that its admins spend adequate time in serving
customers. Make sure that customers are well served and answered all the
questions asked.
v.) Customer have the interest in seeking information regarding the
product
Table 4.38
Question 34
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
strongly disagree 1 1,0 1,0 1,0
disagree 4 4,0 4,0 5,0
neutral 25 25,0 25,0 30,0
agree 56 56,0 56,0 86,0
strongly agree 14 14,0 14,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
Source: Primary data output from SPSS 20
Table 4.38 shows 1% strongly disagree, 4% disagrees, 25% neutrals, 56%
agrees, and 14% strongly agrees. So it can be concluded the majority of
respondents agrees they have the interest in seeking information about the product
102
w.) Customer‟s willingness to try the product
Table 4.39
Source: Primary data output from SPSS 20
Table 4.39 shows 1% strongly disagree, 2% disagrees, 17% neutrals, 63%
agrees, and 17% strongly agrees. So it can be concluded the majority of
respondents agrees they have willingness to try the product
x.) Customer tend to buy the product due to its value and benefits
offered
Table 4.40
Source: Primary data output from SPSS 20
Question 35
Freque
ncy
Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
strongly disagree 1 1,0 1,0 1,0
disagree 2 2,0 2,0 3,0
netral 17 17,0 17,0 20,0
agree 63 63,0 63,0 83,0
strongly agree 17 17,0 17,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
Question 36
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
strongly disagree 2 2,0 2,0 2,0
disagree 4 4,0 4,0 6,0
neutral 16 16,0 16,0 22,0
agree 58 58,0 58,0 80,0
strongly agree 20 20,0 20,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
103
Table 4.40 shows 2% strongly disagree, 4% disagrees, 16% neutrals, 58%
agrees, and 20% strongly agrees. So it can be concluded the majority of
respondents agrees they tend to buy the product due to its value and benefits
y.) Customer have the willingness to own the product
Table 4.41
Question 37
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
strongly disagree 2 2,0 2,0 2,0
disagree 1 1,0 1,0 3,0
neutral 16 16,0 16,0 19,0
agree 60 60,0 60,0 79,0
strongly agree 21 21,0 21,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
Source: Primary data output from SPSS 20
Table 4.41 shows 2% strongly disagree, 1% disagrees, 16% neutrals, 60%
agrees, and 21% strongly agrees. So it can be concluded the majority of
respondents agrees that they have the willingness to own the product.
104
I. Classic Assumption Test
1. Normality Test
Normality test aims to test whether the regression model, the
dependent variable (Purchase Intention) and independent variables
(Electronic Word-of-Mouth (X1)) and Electronic Service Quality (X2))
both have a normal distribution or not. The regression model which is
good and eligible to be used is a normal data distribution or close to be
normal (Ghozali, 2013:160).
According Ghozali (2013: 163), the principle of normality can be
detected by looking at the spread of the data (dots) on the diagonal
axis of the graph probability plots or by looking at the histogram of
the residual.
Basis for decision making as follows:
a. Detection of the histogram, if the normal curve in the graph
follows bell shape, then the data is normally distributed.
b. While the detection of the normal probability plot on the graph, if
the data (dots) spread around the diagonal line, and follow the
direction of the diagonal line, then the regression model to meet
the assumption of normality. If the spread of the data (points) do
not follow the direction of the diagonal, then the regression model
did not meet the assumption of normality.
c. This statistical test that can be used to test the normality of the
residuals is a statistical test of non - parametric Kolmogorov-
105
Smirnov (KS) (Ghozali, 2013:163). Basis for decision making,
when the value of the Kolmogorov Smirnov significance greater
than 0.05, it can be said to be normally distributed data. If the
value of the significance of the KS test is smaller than 0.05, it can
be said the data was not normally distributed (Santoso:2012:19-
196)
Figure 4.2
P-Plot Normal Curve
Source: Processed Primary Data by SPSS 20, 2016
Based on the figure above, this research has conducted normality
data distribution test. From the P-Plot, it can be seen that the plots are
distributed along the diagonal axis, thus it can be concluded that the
data used in this research has a normal distribution.
106
Figure 4.3
Source: Processed Primary Data by SPSS 20, 2016
B
Source: Processed Primary Data by SPSS 20, 2016
Based on the figure 4.43 above, the histogram graphics shows normal
distribution. Besides conducting P-Plot normality curve and histogram, the
researcher also accomplished the normality test with statistical test. One of
the statistical test that can be used to test normality of residual is non-
parametical statistics test Kolmogrov-Smirnov (K-S) (Ghozali, 2013:163).
And the result can be seen as below:
107
Table 4.42
One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Unstandardize
d Residual
N 100
Normal
Parametersa,b
Mean 0E-7
Std.
Deviation 1,94591539
Most Extreme
Differences
Absolute ,122
Positive ,098
Negative -,122
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z 1,224
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) ,100
a. Test distribution is Normal.
b. Calculated from data. Source: Processed Primary Data by SPSS 20, 2016
According to table 4.3, the value of Kolmogrov-Smirnov is 1,224.
Whereas the unstandardized residual has the value of Asymp.Sig which is
greater than 0.05. So it is indicted that the data is distributed normally.
2. Multicolinearity Test
Multicollinearity test aims to test whether the regression model
found a correlation among the independent variables (electronic word-
of-mouth (X1) and electronic service quality (X2)). A good regression
model should not happen correlation between the independent variable
and not orthogonal or the correlation value among independent
variable equals to zero.
To detect the presence or absence of multicollinearity among the
independent variables in regression model, it can be seen from
108
Tolerance and VIF (Variance Inflation Factor) value. If tolerance value
is greater than 0.1and VIF value is smaller than 10, it indicates that
there is no multicolinearity among independent variables (Ghozali,
2013:105). The multicolinearity test result can be seen on the table
below:
Table 4.43
Multicollinearity Test Among Independent Variable Electronic Word-
of-Mouth and Electronic Service Quality
Source: Processed Primary Data by SPSS 20, 2016
From the table 4.43, we can see that each independent variable has
tolerance value > 0.1 and VIF value < 10. Both independent variables has
tolerance value as much as 0.470 and VIF value as much as 2.129. So it
can be said there is no multicollinearity among independent variables in
regression model.
Coefficientsa
Model Unstandardize
d Coefficients
Standar
dized
Coeffici
ents
t Sig. Collinearity
Statistics
B Std.
Error
Beta Tolera
nce
VIF
1
(Cons
tant) 1,846 1,393
1,325 ,188
e-
WOM ,194 ,042 ,482 4,649 ,000 ,470 2,129
e-SQ ,067 ,025 ,283 2,733 ,007 ,470 2,129
a. Dependent Variable: Purchase Intention
109
3. Heteroscedasticity Test
Heteroscedasticity test aims to test whether the regression model of
the residual variance occurs inequality of an observation to another
observations. We can see from the scatterplot graph between the predicted
value of dependent variable and its residual. If it forming certain patterns,
such as dots form a certain pattern regularly (wavy, widened then
narrowed), then Heteroscedasticity indicates has occurred. If there is no
clear pattern and the points spread above and below the 0 on the Y axis,
then there is no heteroscedasticity. A good regression a model is that
happened Homoscedasticity or did not happen Heteroscedasticity
(Ghozali, 2013:139).
Figure 4.4
Graph of Heteroscedasticity
Source: Processed Primary Data by SPSS 20, 2016
110
Based on the graph above, there is no clear pattern and the points
spread above and below the 0 on the Y axis, then it can be said there is no
Heteroscedasticity in this regression model (Ghozali, 2013:139).
J. Multiple Linier Regression Analysis
The analysis technique used in this research is multiple linier
regression. Multiple linier regression used as statistical analysis method
because this research designed to investigte variables that influence from
independent variables towards dependent variable whereby the related
variable is more than one. In order to determine the regression equation, it
can be seen in the following table:
Table 4.44
Multiple Linier Regression
Coefficientsa
Model Unstandardized
Coefficients
Standardize
d
Coefficients
t Sig.
B Std. Error Beta
1
(Constant
) 1,846 1,393
1,325 ,188
e-WOM ,194 ,042 ,482 4,649 ,000
e-SQ ,067 ,025 ,283 2,733 ,007
a. Dependent Variable: Purchase Intention Source: Processed Primary Data by SPSS 20, 2016
111
According to the coefficients table above, we got the equation:
Whereby:
Whereby:
Whereby:
Y = Purchase Intention
a = Constanta
b1 = Regression coefficient of electronic word-of-mouth
X1 = Electronic Word-of-Mouth
b2 = Regression coefficient of electronic service quality
X2 = Electronic Service Quality
e = Standard Error
K. Coefficient of Determination (Adjusted R2)
Coefficient of determination (R2) purposed to analyze how much the
ability of independent variables to explain its dependent variable which
seen through the R2. The variables determination can be seen from the
following table:
Y = a + b1X1 + b2X2 + e
Y = 1.846 + 0.194 X1 + 0.67 X2 + e
112
Table 4.45
Coefficient of Determination (R2) Table
Source: Processed Primary Data by SPSS 20, 2016
The table above shows that the coefficient value of R is 0.715. It
means, the relationship between electronic word-of-mouth and electronic
service quality towards purchase intention is 0.715 or they have a strong
relations. Whereas, the R2 value is 0.511. It indicates that 51.1% purchase
intention variable can be explained by the variation of independent
variables (electronic word-of-mouth and electronic service quality).
So, we can conclude that, 51.1% purchase intention can be explained
by the variables of electronic word-of-mouth and electronic service
quality. And the remaining result, which is 48.9% (100% - 51.1%)
explained by another variables that do not be analyzed in this research.
Model Summaryb
Mode
l
R R
Square
Adjusted R
Square
Std. Error of
the
Estimate
1 ,715a ,511 ,501 1,966
a. Predictors: (Constant), esq, ewom
b. Dependent Variable: pi
113
L. Hypothesis Test
1. Partial Test (T-Test)
T-test shows how big the influence of the independent variables
individually in explaining the variation of dependent variable that is used
to determine the effect of each independent variable individually towards
dependent variable that tested at the significancy level 0.05 (Ghozali,
2013:98).
Table 4.47
The Result of T-Test
Source: Processed Primary Data by SPSS 20, 2016
T-test result in the coefficient table above indicates there is influence
between independent variable partially towards dependent variable, with
the elaboration as follow:
1) The influence of electronic word-of-mouth (X1) towards purchase
intention (Y)
Coefficientsa
Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized
Coefficients
t Sig.
B Std. Error Beta
1
(Constant) 1,846 1,393
1,325 ,188
ewom ,194 ,042 ,482 4,649 ,000
esq ,067 ,025 ,283 2,733 ,007
a. Dependent Variable: pi
114
a) Ho : β 1 = 0 ; there is no significant influence between electronic
word-of-mouth (X1) towards purchase intention (Y)
b) Ha : β 1 ≠ 0 ; there is significant influence between electronic
word-of-mouth (X1) towards purchase intention (Y)
According to the table 4.46 it can be seen that the value of T-test
4.649 > T-table 1.9845 with the significance value of 0.000 < sig. 0.05.
Thus, we conclude Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted, means
electronic word-of-mouth (X1) has significant influence partially
towards purchase intention (Y).
The result of this research is concordant with the previous research
conducted by Chinho Lin (2013) on the title “Electronic word-of-
mouth: The moderating roles of product involvement and brand
image”. Result of this research indicates a positive relationship
between electronic word-of-mouth and purchase intention.
Results also emphasize that the respondents are more willing to
have the intention to buy Xiaomi‟ product when they found reviews
from social media Facebook that assured its quality of reviews, many
people give reviews regarding the product which indicates the
popularity of the product itself, and the reviewers also have the
credibility in giving a review and they experienced with the product.
115
2) The influence of electronic service quality towards purchase intention
a) Ho : β 1 = 0 ; there is no significant influence between electronic
service quality (X2) towards purchase intention (Y)
b) Ha : β 1 ≠ 0 ; there is significant influence between electronic
service quality (X2) towards purchase intention (Y)
According to the table 4.47 it can be seen that the value of T-test
2.733 > T-table 1.9845 with the significance value of 0.007 < sig. 0.05.
Thus, we conclude Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted, means
electronic service quality (X2) has significant influence partially
toward purchase intention (Y).
The result of this research is concordant with the previous research
conducted by Gwo-Gang Lee (2006) on the title “Customer
perceptions of e-service quality in online shopping”. This study
resulted that the dimensions of reliability, web site design,
responsiveness, and security affect overall service quality and
customer satisfacton. Moreover, the latter in turn are significantly
related to custome purchase intentiions. Besides of that, Mohd Fazli
(2006) on the title “Website quality and consumer online purchase
intention” also founded that empathy which one of e-service quality
dimensions being analyzed in this study have significant influence
towards purchase intention.
Therefore, in the other hand we can conclude that having an overall
good electronic service quality is important to create customer
116
purchase intention. Online retailers with excellent service quality will
incresing customer intention for buying (Khristianto et.al.,2012)
2. F-Test (Simultaneous Test)
Table 4.46
The Result of F-Test
Source: Processed Primary Data by SPSS 20, 2016
F-test shows whether all independent variables have significance
influence simultaneously towards dependent variable (Ghozali, 2013:98).
Hypothesis used in this research is:
1) Ho : β1,2 = 0 ; there is no relationship between between electronic
word-of-mouth through social media Facebook and electronic service
quality simultaneously towards purchase intention.
2) Ha : β1,2 ≠ 0 ; there is relationship between electronic word-of-mouth
through social media Facebook and electronic service quality
simultaneously towards purchase intention.
ANOVAa
Model Sum of Squares
df Mean Square F Sig.
1
Regression 391,488 2 195,744 50,650 ,000b
Residual 374,872 97 3,865
Total 766,360 99 a. Dependent Variable: pi
b. Predictors: (Constant), esq, ewom
117
From the ANOVA or F-test is obtained F value test is 50.650 with
significance 0.000. The degree of freedom (df1) = 2 and df2 = 97. Thus,
we got F-table for the F-test 3.090 with the significance level = 0.05;
because the probability is smaller than the significance level (0.000 <
0.05), and the F-test value is higher than F-table value ( the value of F-test
is 50.650 > F-table 3.090). Therefore this means Ho is rejected and Ha is
accepted, and can be concluded that the independent variables such as
electronic word-of-mouth through social media Facebook (X1) and
electronic service quality (X2) have significant influence towards purchase
intention (Y) simultaneously.
118
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
A. Conclusion
The purpose of this research is to analyze the influence of
electronic word-of-mouth through social media Facebook and electronic
service quality towards purchase intention. Based on the statistical test using
the SPSS software have been examined the result of 37 questions related
with electronic word-of-mouth and electronic service quality towards
Purchase Intention gathered from 100 Xiaomi users registered in MiForum
as respondents, then obtained conclusions as follows:
1. The influence of electronic word-of-mouth through social media
Facebook toward purchase intention
According to multiple linier regression analysis, the value of T-
test 4.649 > 1.9845 with the value of significant 0.000 < α 0.05.
Thus, we can concluded Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted, so
partially electronic word-of-mouth (X1) has significant influence
towards purchase intention (Y) of Xiaomi smartphone users.
2. The influence of electronic service quality toward purchase
intention
According to multiple linier regression analysis, , the value of T-
test 2.733 > 1.9845 with the value of significant 0.007 < α 0.05.
Thus, we can concluded Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted, so
119
partially electronic service quality (X2) has significant influence
towards purchase intention (Y) of Xiaomi smartphone users.
3. The influence of electronic word-of-mouth through social media
Facebook and electronic service quality toward purchase
intention
From the ANOVA test or the F-test value is obtained, which is
50.625 with the probabilities of 0.000. Due to the facts that
probabilities are smaller than 0.05 and the F-test value is higher
than F-table value (3.090). The value of F-test is 50.625 > F-
table 3.090, and the significance value is 0.000 < 0.005, so it can
be concluded that independent variables, those referring
electronic word-of-mouth (X1) and Electronic service quality
(X2) have significant influence simultaneously towards purchase
intention (Y).
B. Recommendation
After reviewing the results of the study, recommendations that the
author propose are as follows:
1. For Company
The result of this research shows, that electronic word-of-mouth
and electronic service quality have significant influence towards
purchase intention and also electronic word-of-mouth and electronic
service quality simultaneously have significant influence towards
120
purchase intention. Based on the result, the researcher recommends to
the company as follows:
a. Electronic word-of-mouth
In this study, researcher assessed the influence of
electronic word-of-mouth on social media Facebook towards
consumer‟ purchase intention with strong category which going to
be very strong category. Therefore, Xiaomi should be retaining e-
WOM by continuing to increase the involvement and
empowerment of consumers in order to create brand advocates
which will certainly beneficial for Xiaomi itself. In addition,
customer engagement on social media also needs to be maintained
and enhanced in order to create long-term relationships of the old
consumer and attracting new consumers. This relationships are
important because they can turn a one-time customer into a loyal
supporter who trusts the company. When customers feel like a
valued part of the company they will be more willing to pass on
information about the company. Xiaomi parties can provide the
customers or in this case called MiForum members with valuable
or helpful information through a variety of communication
channels. Xiaomi parties can also communicate with them via
social media including liking their posts and responding to their
comments. Since every customer is different, Xiaomi will need to
tailor the approach to keep customers continually engaged with.
121
However, all brand advocates are different and want to be
appreciated in different ways. So to keep Xiaomi‟ brand advocates
happy, it needs to make them feel special. This may involve
providing them discounts, bonus, or recognising them as
“customer of the month” on social media channels. Besides of
that, it also recommend for Xiaomi to inviting MiForum members
on a special gathering, in the hope this kind of activity can
strengthening the relationship between MiForum members and
Xiaomi parties itself.
The limitations of this study was only researching e-WOM
on the Facebook, microblogging site. Because of e-WOM is quite
extensive coverage, not just limited to Facebook, further research
is expected to perfection scientists can examine the overall of e-
WOM. Either via twitter, blogs, consumer opinion platform,
kaskus, and various other online forums.
b. Electronic service quality
Electronic service can play a critical role in improving
services quality delivered to its customers as it can
achieve survival, increase satisfaction and trust, and then
generate the competitive success for company (Field et.al.,
2004). Customer perceived e-service quality is one of the critical
determinants of the success of online business (Yang et.al.,
122
2004). Throgh this study, the researcher suggest that to enhance
customer purchase intention, online stores should develop
marketing strategies to better address the reliability, trustworthhy,
and responsiveness of web-based services. Online stores can
devote valuable corporate resources to the important e-service
quality attributes that have been identified in this study. For
example, improvement of the level of credibility, security, and
prompt services is necessity for both attracting and retaining
online customers, since these factors significantly affect customer
satisfaction and purchase intentions.
Second, in order to strengthen competitiveness, service
provider should give more attention on website quality in the form
of improving the website usability, design, and information quality.
This is because, these factors might influence customer online
purchase inetention. Website should also be well facilitated. Make
sure that the site loads quickly, whether on a computer or a mobile
device. Customers should also be able to easily navigate the
Xiaomi‟ website. Because for online business like Xiaomi, website
is the platform for business and to help avoid the users losing
interest. Another important thing is about the online customer
secutiry. On the other hand, studies have indicated that many
online customers are very concerned about threats to their
personal privacy (Graeff and Harmon, 2002). Online store thus
123
must try to ensure that customers receive relevant information
while simultaneously protecting their privacy, because
someone‟ personalization should not be intrusive. Another crucial
factors, the online store needs to focus on its customer relationship
because ths will increase sense of empathy for the customers.
Service provider needs to search for ways to enhance their
customer relationship management (CRM) that earn customer trust
and perceived empathy. Providing product and services that is
competent, excellent and reliable may increase customer trust.
Therefore, Xiaomi needs to restructure its e-CRM strategy to
create and maintain a two-way relationship to improve customer
online purchase intention. Since empathy plays a major role in
influencing the customer online purchase intention.
The last but not least, the online store is also can not be
spared from its human resources. In this case of Xiaomi, it should
ensure if Xiaomi‟ employees serve customers with excellences.
Always prioritized to give greate service for the customers because
for every business, customer is always number one. The customer
service of Xiaomi who give service should show that they are
listening to their customers. Try to prove them the clear and
concise communication and show that the admins are eager to keep
the lines of communication open.
124
2. For Future Research
a. Data collection in this study is by distributing the electonic
questionnaire, in which by the distribution of questionnaire is
possible that the respondents are not serious in giving an answer,
therefore, the researcher suggest further research to conduct an
open interview with the respondent in order to obtain more
accurate informations
b. For future research, the researcher suggest to conduct deeper and
more integrated research by not only use social media Facebook
but the next researcher can investigate e-WOM through another
integrated social media that usually being used by a company or a
brand, for instance twitter, blog, youtube, and so forth. Researcher
also suggest for the next researcher to expand the scope limitation
of samples taken in the study of Xiaomi users, in order to obtain
more extensive information about the products to be studied
125
REFERENCES
Ajibola, O.D. & Njogo, B.O. (2012) The effect of customer behavior and
attitudinal tendencies towards purchase decision: A case study of Unilever
Nigeria Plc, Cadbury Nigeria Plc, and United African Companies Plc.
Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 12, 134-145.
Arndt, J. (1967). Role of Product-Related Conversations in the Diffusion of a
New Product. Journal of Marketing Research, 291-295.
Awad, N.F. & Rogowsky, A. (2008). Establishing trust in electronic commerce
through online word of mouth: an examination across gender. Journal of
Management Information Systems, 24 (4), 101-121.
Ajzen, I.,& Fishbein, M. (1975). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social
Behavior, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice- Hall.
Basu, A. & Muylle, S. (2003). Authentication in electronic commerce.
Communication of the Association for Computing Machinery.
Berthon, P., Ewing, M.T., & Napoli, J. (2008). Brand management in small to
medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Small Business Management, 46, 27-
45.
Bhattacherjee, A.S. (2006). Influence process for information technology
acceptance:an elaboration likelihood model. MIS Quarterly, 30(4), 805-825.
Bloch, P. H. & Richins, M.L (1983). A Theoretical Model for the Study of
Product Importance Perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 47, 69-81.
Breazeale, M. (2009). Word of mouse: An assessment of electronic word-of-
mouth research. International Journal of Market Research.
Brown, J. J. and Reingen, P. H. (1987). Social Ties and Word-of-Mouth Referrral
Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 350-362.
Buttle, F.A. (1998). Word of mouth: understanding and managing referral
marketing. Journal of Strategic Management. 6, 241-254.
Chatterjee, P. (2001). “Online Reviews – do consumers use them?” Advances in
Customer Research, 28, 129-133.
Cheung, C.M.K., & Thadani. D.R., (2010). The Effectiveness of Electronic Word-
of-Mouth Communication: A Literature Analysis. In: 23rd Bled
eConference eTrust: Implications for the Individual, Enterprises and
Society.
126
Cheong, H.J. & Morrison, M.A. (2008). Consumers‟ reliance on product
information and recommendations found in UGC. Journal of Interactive
Advertising, 8, 38-44.
Cotirlea,D (2011). Issues regarding e-service quality management-customization
on online tourism domain. Polish journal of management studies. 3,34.
Dellarocas, C. (2002). The Digitization of Word of Mouth: Promise and
Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms. Management Science.
Doherty, N.F., & Ellis, C. F.E. (2009). Exploring the Drivers, Scope, and
Perceived Success of e-commerce Strategies in the UK Retail Sector.
European Journal of Marketing, 43, 1246-1262.
Duhan, D., Johnson, S.D., Wilcox, J.B., Harrell, G.D., (1997). Influences on
consumer use of word-ofmouth recommendation sources. Academy of
Marketing Science, 283.
Evanschitzky, H., Gopalkrishnan, R., Hesse, J., & Dieter, A. (2004). E-
satisfaction: a re-examination. Journal of Retailing, 80, 239-247.
Frambach, R.T., Roest, H.C.A, &Krishnan, T.V. (2007)The impact of consumer
internet experience on channel preferences and usage intentions across the
different stages of the buying process. Journal of Interactive Marketing. 21
(2), 26-41.
Field, J.M., Heim,G.R.,& Sinha, K.K. (2004). Managing quality in the eservice
system: Development and application of a process model. Production
and Operations Management. 13(4), 291-306
Gfrerer, A. & Pkory, J (2012). Traditional versus Electronic Word-of-Mouth.
Journal of Interntional Marketing and Brand Management.
Godes & Mayzlin, D. (2004). Using online conversations to study word of mouth
communication. Marketing Science, 23.
Gilly, M.C. & Graham, J.L (1998). A dyadic study of interpersonal information
search. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 26 (2), 83-100.
Gruen T.W., Osmonbekov, T., & Czaplewski, A.J. (2005) eWOM: The impact of
customer-to-customer online know-how exchange on customer value and
loyalty. Journal of Business Research, 59, 449-456.
Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K.P., Walsh, G. and Gremler, D.D., (2004).
Electronic Word-of-Mouth via Consumer-Opinion Platforms: What
127
Motivates Consumers to Articulate Themselves on the Internet? Journal of
Interactive Marketing, 18, 38-52.
Herr, P.M., Kardes,F.R., and Kim, J. (1991). Effects of word-of-mouth and
product attribute information on persuasion: an accessibility-diagnosticity
perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 454-462.
Hermawan Kertajaya, (2010). Brand Operation The Official MIM Academy
course book. Jakarta: Erlangga Group.
Hongxiu, L. & Reima, S. (2009). A proposed scale for measuring e-service
quality. International Journal of u- and e-service, science, and technology
2(1), 1-9.
Horrison-Walker (2001). The measurement of word-of-mouth communication and
an investigation of service quality and customer commitment as potential
antecedents. Journal of Service Research, 4, 60-75.
Ho,C., & Lee, y. (2007). The development of an e-Travel Service Quality Scale.
Tourism Management, 28 (6), 143-1449.
Hu, N., Liu, L. & Zhang, J. (2008). Do online reviews affect product sales? The
role of reviewr characteristics and temporal affects. Information Technology
and Management, 9 (3), 201.
Imam Ghozali. 2013. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS
21. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro
Jun, M., & Cai, S. (2001). The key determinants of internet banking service
quality: a content analysis. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 19 (7),
276-291.
Kaplan, A.M. & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges
and opportunities of Social Media. Elsevier Business Horizons, 53, 59-68.
Kietzmann, J.H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I.P., & Silvestre, B.S., (2011). Social
media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social
media, Journal of Elsevier, 54, 241-251.
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. (2000). Marketing Management, 13th ed. New Jersey:
Prentice Hall.
Lee, M. and Youn, S. (2009). Electronic word of mouth (eWOM). How eWOM
platforms influence consumer product judgement. International Journal of
Advertising, 28, 473-499.
128
Lewin, J.E (2008). Business customer‟s satisfaction. Journal Industrial Marketing
Management, 38, 283-299.
Madu, C.N. & Madu, A.A. (2002). Dimensions of equality. International Journal
of Quality & Reliability Management, 19(3), 246-259.
Malhotra, N.K. (2004). Marketing Research. Pearson: Prentice Hall
Mital, V., & Kamakura,W.A.(2001). Satisfaction, repurchase intent, and
repurchase behavior:Investigating the moderating effect of customer
characteristics. Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (1), 131-142.
Oliver, Ronald L, (1997). Satisfaction A Behavioral Perspective On The
Consumer. Singapore: McGraw-Hill
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., & Berry, L.L (1988). A Conceptual Model of
Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research, Journal of
Marketing, 49, 41-50
Parasuraman & Zinkhan (2002). Marketing to and serving customers through the
internet: An overview and research agenda. Journal of the Academy of
Marketing Science, 30, 286-295.
Prendergast, G., Ko, D. and Yuen, S.Y.V. (2010). Online word of mouth and
consumer purchase intentions. International Journal of Advertising, 29,
687-708.
Porter, M. E. (1985). The Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining
Superior Performance. New York: The Free Press.
Rani, P. (2014). Factors influencing consumer behaviour. International Journal of
Current Research and Acedemic Review, 2, 52-61.
Raza, A.,Ahad, M.A., Shafqat, M.A., Aurangzaib, M. (2014). The determinants of
purchase intention towards counterfeit mobile phone in Pakistan. Journal of
Public Administration and Governance. 4 (3).
Reingen, Kernan, J.B (1986). Analysis of Referral Networks in Marketing:
Methods and Illustration. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 370-378.
Riduwan & Achmad Kuncoro. 2008. Cara Menggunakan Dan Memakai Path
Analysis. Bandung: Alfabeta
Riduwan & Akdon. 2013. Rumus dan Data dalam Aplikasi Statistika. Bandung:
Alfabeta.
129
Schiffman, L,G., and Kanuk, L,L (2000). Consumer Behavior. 7th Edition. United
States:Person
Schindler, R.M. and Bickart, B., 2005. Published Word of Mouth: Referable,
Consumer-Generated Information on the Internet. In: Haugtvedt, C.P.,
Machleit,K.A. and Yalch, R.P., 2005. Online Consumer Psychology:
Understanding and Influencing Consumer Behavior in the Virtual World.
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Ch. 2, 35-61.
Senecal, S., & Nantel, J. (2004). The influence of online product recommendation
on consumers‟ online choice. Journal of retailing, 80, 159-169.
Sher, P. & Lee, S. (2009). Consumer Skepticism and Online Reviews: An
Elaboration Likelihood Model Perspective. Social Behavior and Personality,
37(1), 137.
Shu-Chuan & Yoojung (2011). Determinants of consumer engagement in
electronic word-of-mouth (Ewom) in social networking sites. International
Journal of Advertising: The review of marketing communications, 30 (1).
Smith and Park, C.W (1992). The Effects of Brand Extensions on Market Share
and Advertising Efficiency. Journal of Marketing Research, 29 (3), 296-
314.
Solomon, M.R. (2004). Consumer Behavior: Buying, Having, and Being. United
States: Pearson
Srinivasan, S.S., Anderson, R., Ponnavolu, K. (2002). Consumer Loyalty in e-
commerce: an exploration of its antecedents and consequences. Journal of
Retailing, 78, 41-50.
Steffes, E.M. and Burgee, L.E. (2009). Social ties and online word of mouth.
Internet Research 19, 42-59.
Strutton, H.D., Taylor, D.G., & Thompson, K. (2011). Investigating generational
differences in e-WOM behaviours.
Sugiyono. 2009. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung:
Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. 2013. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan Kombinasi (Mixed
Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Trusov, M., Bucklin, R.E., & Pauwels, K. (2009). Effects of Word-of-Mouth
Versus Traditional Marketing: Findings from an Internet Social Networking
Site. Journal of Marketing. 73, 90-102.
130
Westbrook, R.A. (1987), “Product/consumption-based affective responses and
post purchase processes”. Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 258-70.
Wirtz, Jochen, Chew, Patricia (2002). The effects of incentives, deal proneness,
satisfaction and tie strength on word-of-mouth behaviour. International
Journal of Service Industry Management, 141-162.
Wolfinbarger, M., & Gilly, M. (2003). Etailq: Dimensions analizing, meassuring,
and predicting etail quality. Jurnal of Retailing, 79, 183-198.
Yang, Z. & Fang, X. (2004). Online service quality dimensions and their
relationships with satisfaction: A content analysis of customer reviews of
securities brokerage services. International Journal of Service Industry
Management,15(3), 3023.
Zeithaml, V.A., Parasuraman, A., Malhotra, A. (2002). Service Quality Delivery
Through Websites: A Critical Review of Extant Knowledge. Journal of the
Academy of Marketing Science, 30 , 358-371.
Electronic Sources:
Ashes (2015). Flurry reports: Xiaomi is third largest smartphone manufacturer in
China beating all local manufacturers. Retrieved 30 April 2016 from
http://appslova.com/flurry-reports-xiaomi-is-third-largest-smartphone-
manufacturer-in-china-beating-all-local-manufacturers/
Khan, A. (2015). Xiaomi sold 34.7 Million Smartphone in 1H 2015. Retrieved
Retrieved 30 April 2016 from http://dazeinfo.com/2015/07/02/xiaomi-sold-
34-7-million-smartphones-1h-2015-nearly-300-growth-y-o-y/
Number of internet users worldwide from 2005 to 2015. Retrieved 28 December
2015 from www.statista.com.
Number of internet users in Indonesia from 2014 to 2019. Retrieved 30 April
2016 from www.statista.com.
The growth of social media users. Retrieved 28 December 2015 from
https://www.forrester.com/home/
Top Five Smartphone Vendors, Worldwide Shipment, Marketshare and y/y
Growth, 3Q 2014. Retrieved 30 April 2016 from www.appleinsider.com
Porciuncula and Martinez, 2015. Xiaomi Inc.-2015 India Positioning Strategy
(Part 1). Retrieved September, 22th 2016 from
http://www.slideshare.net/CaioPorciuncula/xiaomi-inc-positioning-and-
strategy-for-entry-into-indian-smartphone-market
131
Appendix 1: Research Questionnaire
Research Questionnaire
“The Influence of Electronic Word-of-Mouth through Social Media
Facebook and Electronic Service Quality towards Purchase Intention
(Case Study of Xiaomi Smartphone Users in Mi Forum)
Regarding to finish the program of Bachelor Degree Faculty Economics and
Business Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta, who is writing this
thesis as a requirement to get Bachelor Degree of Economic:
Name : Imanina Almas
NIM : 1111081200009
Major : Management
Faculty : Economics and Business
I will do research about “The Influence of Electronic Word-of-Mouth through
Social Media Facebook and Electronic Service Quality towards Purchase
Intention (Case Study of Xiaomi Smartphone Users in Mi Forum)”.
Therefore, I wish Mr/Mrs/Brother/Sister are willing to fill out this questionnaire.
132
Screening
Sebelum menyelesaikan kuesioner, diharapkan kepada saudara/i untuk
melengkapi detail dibawah dengan membubuhkan tanda centang pada kotak yang
sudah disediakan:
1. Apakah anda pernah berbelanja di www.mi.com/id/ ?
Ya Tidak
Jika Ya, tolong lanjutkan ke pertanyaan selanjutnya.
Jika Tidak, tolong berhenti menjawab dan berhenti disini. Terima kasih
atas partisipasi anda.
2. Apakah anda memiliki akun Facebook?
Ya Tidak
Jika Ya, tolong lanjutkan ke pertanyaan selanjutnya.
Jika Tidak, tolong berhenti menjawab dan berhenti disini. Terima kasih
atas partisipasi anda.
Identitas Responden
Nama : ................................................
Jenis Kelamin : Pria Wanita
Umur : < 20 tahun 50 – 65 tahun
20 - < 35 tahun > 65 tahun
35 - < 50 tahun
133
Instruksi Pengisian
Tolong isi setiap pertanyaan di bawah sesuai dengan pendapat
Saudara/i tentang “The Influence of Electronic Word-of-Mouth
through Social Media Facebook and Electronic Service Quality
towards Purchase Intention (Case Study of Xiaomi Smartphone Users
in Mi Forum)”.
Pilih satu jawaban dari lima alternative jawaban dengan
memberikan tanda centang pada salah satu kolom yang disediakan.
1 2 3 4 5
STS TS N S SS
Details :
1. Sangat tidak setuju 4. Setuju
2. Tidak setuju 5. Sangat setuju
3. Netral
Electronic Word-of-Mouth (X1)
Electronic Word-of-Mouth Quality
No Questions STS TS N S SS
1 Online review
pada MiForum
dalam social
media Facebook
mudah dipahami
2 Online review
sangat membantu
customer dalam
memilih produk
Xiaomi
3 Online review
merupakan review
yang terpercaya
4
Secara umum,
kualitas online
review pada
MiForum dalam
social media
Facebook sangat
tinggi
134
Electronic Word-of-Mouth Quantity
No Questions STS TS N S SS
5 Banyaknya jumlah review tentang
Xiaomi pada sosial media Facebook,
menunjukkan bahwa produk Xiaomi
populer di masyarakat
6 Review tentang Xiaomi mengurangi
kegelisahan saya dalam melakukan
pembelian
7 Dengan banyaknya orang yang
merekomendasikan produk Xiaomi,
menunjukkan bahwa Xiaomi memiliki
reputasi yang baik
8.
Jumlah reviewer yang banyak
mempengaruhi saya dalam
memutuskan untuk membeli produk
Xiaomi
Sender’s Expertise
No Questions STS TS N S SS
9 Saya merasa, reviewer produk Xiaomi
adalah orang yang memiliki
pengetahuan tentang produk Xiaomi itu
sendiri
10 Saya merasa, reviewer produk Xiaomi
adalah orang yang telah berpengalaman
11 Reviewer adalah orang yang memiliki
kemampuan dalam menilai sesuatu
secara objektif
12 Kemampuan reviewer membuat saya
lebih yakin dalam melakukan pembelian
135
Electronic Service Quality (X2)
Reliability
No Questions STS TS N S SS
13 Website Xiaomi mampu memberikan
pelayanan sesuai dengan yang
dijanjikan
14 Website Xiaomi selalu tersedia
15 Website Xiaomi berfungsi dengan baik
16
Website Xiaomi mudah untuk di
gunakan
17 Website Xiaomi menyediakan
informasi yang akurat
18 Perusahaan Xiaomi merupakan
perusahaan yang jujur dalam menjual
produknya
Web Design
No Questions STS TS N S SS
19 Menurut saya, website Xiaomi
memiliki tampilan web yang
teroganisir dengan baik
20 Pilihan menu dalam website
Xiaomi konsisten dan
terstandarisasi dengan baik
21 Informasi dalam website
Xiaomi sangat jelas sehingga
memudahkan customer dalam
bertransaksi
Security
No Questions STS TS N S SS
22 Website Xiaomi mampu
menjaga keamanan informasi
pribadi customer
23 Website Xiaomi mampu
memberikan jaminan keamanan
transaksi kepada customer
24 Aturan dalam pembayaran dan
pengiriman barang dijelaskan
secara transparan dan terperinci
136
25 Menurut saya, website Xiaomi
memilliki reputasi yang baik
Empathy
No Questions STS TS N S SS
26 Staff admin website Xiaomi
memberikan perhatian personal
kepada customer
27 Staff admin mengerti kebutuhan
customer
28 Staff admin website Xiaomi
melayani customer dengan
sopan
29 Website Xiaomi memberikan
informasi kontak sehingga
memudahkan customer dalam
melakukan transaksi
30 Staff admin menanggapi
komplain customer dengan baik
Responsiveness
No Questions STS TS N S SS
31 Staff admin melaksanan
pelayanan dengan cepat
32 Staff admin selalu bersedia
membantu para customer ketika
terdapat masalah saat
bertransaksi
33 Staff admin meluangkan waktu
yang memadai untuk melayani
customer
Purchase Intention (Y)
No Questions STS TS N S SS
34 Saya tertarik untuk mengumpulkan
informasi tentang produk Xiaomi
35 Saya memiliki keinginan untuk
mencoba produk Xiaomi
36 Saya cenderung membeli produk
Xiaomi karena kualitasnya telah
menyita perhatian saya
37 Saya memiliki keinginan untuk
memiliki produk Xiaomi
137
Appendix 2: Multiple Linier Regression Analysis Questionnaire
Respondent
Quality of e-WOM
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
1 4 4 4 3
2 4 4 4 4
3 4 4 4 4
4 4 5 3 3
5 4 4 5 3
6 3 3 4 4
7 2 2 2 2
8 4 5 4 4
9 5 5 5 4
10 4 4 4 5
11 5 5 5 4
12 4 4 4 4
13 3 4 3 4
14 4 4 4 4
15 4 4 4 4
16 4 4 4 4
17 2 2 2 2
18 4 5 4 3
19 3 3 3 3
20 2 2 2 2
21 4 5 4 3
22 1 3 3 1
23 4 4 3 3
24 4 3 4 4
25 4 4 4 5
26 3 4 4 3
27 3 3 3 3
28 1 1 1 1
29 4 4 4 3
30 2 2 2 2
31 3 3 3 3
32 3 4 4 4
33 4 3 4 4
34 4 4 2 4
35 4 4 4 4
138
36 4 4 4 5
37 4 4 3 4
38 4 4 4 4
39 3 4 3 2
40 4 3 4 4
41 4 4 4 3
42 4 4 3 3
43 5 5 5 5
44 3 4 3 4
45 5 5 4 4
46 4 4 4 3
47 4 3 4 4
48 4 4 3 3
49 4 4 4 5
50 5 3 4 3
51 3 4 3 4
52 4 4 4 4
53 4 3 4 4
54 4 4 3 3
55 4 4 3 3
56 4 4 4 4
57 3 4 4 4
58 5 5 5 5
59 4 4 4 3
60 4 4 3 3
61 3 4 4 3
62 1 4 4 4
63 3 4 5 3
64 4 4 4 4
65 3 4 3 4
66 3 4 3 2
67 4 3 3 3
68 3 3 3 3
69 3 3 3 3
70 4 3 4 3
71 4 4 4 4
72 3 4 4 3
73 4 4 4 2
74 4 4 4 4
75 4 5 4 3
76 3 3 3 3
139
77 4 4 3 3
78 3 3 4 4
79 3 4 3 2
80 3 4 3 2
81 4 4 3 4
82 1 3 3 1
83 4 3 3 3
84 4 4 4 4
85 4 4 4 4
86 3 3 3 3
87 4 5 4 3
88 5 5 5 5
89 4 4 4 4
90 3 3 3 3
91 4 4 2 2
92 3 4 3 2
93 2 2 2 2
94 4 4 4 4
95 1 3 3 1
96 4 4 4 4
97 3 3 3 3
98 4 4 4 3
99 3 3 3 3
100 4 5 4 3
Respondent
Quantity of e-WOM
Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8
1 4 3 4 4
2 4 4 4 3
3 4 4 4 4
4 4 4 4 5
5 3 5 4 4
6 4 4 4 4
7 3 3 3 3
8 5 3 5 5
9 4 4 5 5
10 5 5 4 5
11 4 4 4 4
12 4 4 4 4
140
13 4 2 5 5
14 4 5 5 3
15 3 4 3 4
16 5 5 5 5
17 3 3 3 3
18 5 4 5 4
19 4 4 4 4
20 3 3 3 3
21 3 3 3 3
22 2 3 3 3
23 3 4 3 3
24 4 4 5 4
25 5 4 4 4
26 4 4 5 4
27 4 4 4 4
28 3 3 3 3
29 4 4 5 5
30 2 2 1 1
31 3 3 2 2
32 4 3 3 3
33 4 4 5 4
34 4 4 4 4
35 4 3 4 4
36 4 5 5 4
37 3 4 5 4
38 4 4 4 4
39 4 3 4 2
40 4 4 4 4
41 4 3 4 4
42 4 4 4 4
43 4 5 5 5
44 4 4 4 4
45 4 4 5 4
46 4 3 4 4
47 3 2 4 3
48 4 3 5 5
49 4 5 5 4
50 4 4 4 4
51 3 2 3 3
52 4 4 4 4
53 4 3 4 3
141
54 4 4 4 4
55 3 4 3 4
56 4 5 4 4
57 4 3 3 3
58 5 5 5 5
59 3 3 4 4
60 4 4 4 4
61 5 4 4 4
62 5 5 4 4
63 5 4 4 3
64 4 4 4 4
65 4 4 4 2
66 4 3 4 2
67 4 3 4 4
68 3 3 3 2
69 4 4 4 4
70 2 4 4 4
71 4 2 4 5
72 4 4 4 4
73 4 4 4 4
74 4 4 4 4
75 4 4 4 4
76 3 3 3 4
77 4 3 5 5
78 4 3 5 5
79 4 3 4 2
80 3 4 3 3
81 3 3 4 4
82 2 3 3 3
83 4 3 4 4
84 4 5 5 4
85 4 4 4 4
86 3 3 3 3
87 4 4 4 4
88 5 5 5 5
89 4 4 4 4
90 3 3 3 3
91 3 4 3 4
92 3 4 3 3
93 2 2 2 2
94 4 4 4 4
142
95 2 3 3 3
96 4 4 4 4
97 3 3 3 3
98 4 3 4 4
99 4 4 4 4
100 4 4 4 4
Respondent
Sender' Expertise
Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12
1 4 4 4 3
2 4 4 5 4
3 3 4 3 4
4 4 4 3 5
5 4 4 4 4
6 4 4 4 4
7 3 3 3 3
8 4 3 4 4
9 5 4 3 4
10 5 5 5 5
11 4 3 4 4
12 4 4 4 5
13 4 4 4 4
14 4 4 4 4
15 4 4 3 4
16 4 4 4 4
17 2 2 3 3
18 3 3 4 4
19 3 3 3 3
20 3 3 3 3
21 4 4 3 3
22 3 3 2 3
23 4 4 4 4
24 4 4 4 3
25 3 5 5 5
26 4 4 3 4
27 3 4 4 4
28 2 2 2 1
29 4 3 4 4
30 2 2 1 2
31 3 3 3 2
32 3 4 4 3
143
33 4 4 4 4
34 4 4 5 4
35 4 4 4 4
36 3 3 4 4
37 4 4 3 4
38 4 4 4 4
39 4 5 5 5
40 3 3 4 3
41 4 4 4 4
42 4 2 3 4
43 5 4 5 5
44 4 4 4 4
45 3 3 3 4
46 4 4 4 4
47 4 4 2 4
48 4 3 3 5
49 3 3 4 4
50 4 4 4 4
51 4 4 4 3
52 4 4 4 5
53 4 4 3 3
54 4 3 3 4
55 3 3 3 4
56 2 2 4 4
57 3 4 4 3
58 5 3 5 5
59 3 4 4 4
60 4 4 4 4
61 4 3 3 3
62 5 5 4 4
63 4 4 3 4
64 4 4 4 4
65 4 3 4 4
66 4 5 5 5
67 4 3 3 3
68 2 3 2 3
69 3 3 3 3
70 3 2 2 4
71 3 4 4 4
72 3 4 4 4
73 4 2 4 5
144
74 4 4 4 4
75 5 4 4 4
76 4 4 4 4
77 4 3 3 5
78 4 4 3 3
79 4 5 5 5
80 4 4 4 4
81 4 4 4 4
82 3 3 2 3
83 4 3 3 3
84 4 4 3 5
85 4 4 4 4
86 3 3 3 3
87 5 4 4 4
88 5 5 5 5
89 4 4 4 4
90 3 3 3 3
91 4 4 3 3
92 4 4 4 4
93 2 2 2 2
94 4 4 4 4
95 3 3 2 3
96 4 4 4 4
97 3 3 3 3
98 4 4 4 4
99 4 3 2 3
100 5 4 4 4
Respondent
Reliability
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6
1 3 3 4 4 4 4
2 3 4 3 4 4 4
3 4 4 4 4 4 4
4 5 5 4 5 5 4
5 4 4 4 4 4 4
6 4 4 4 4 4 4
7 3 3 3 3 3 3
8 4 3 4 4 4 3
9 4 5 5 5 5 5
10 4 4 4 4 4 4
11 5 5 4 4 4 3
12 3 4 4 4 3 4
145
13 4 4 4 4 4 4
14 4 4 4 4 4 4
15 4 3 4 4 4 3
16 4 4 4 4 4 4
17 3 3 3 3 3 3
18 4 4 4 4 3 4
19 4 4 4 4 4 4
20 3 3 3 3 3 3
21 3 3 3 4 4 3
22 4 4 4 4 4 3
23 4 4 3 3 3 3
24 4 4 5 5 4 4
25 4 4 4 4 4 4
26 3 3 4 4 3 3
27 3 3 3 3 3 3
28 3 3 3 3 3 3
29 4 2 4 4 4 3
30 2 2 2 2 2 2
31 3 3 3 3 3 3
32 4 4 4 4 3 3
33 3 4 3 4 4 4
34 5 5 5 3 4 5
35 4 4 4 4 4 4
36 3 3 3 4 4 3
37 4 4 4 4 4 4
38 4 4 4 4 4 4
39 3 3 3 2 3 3
40 3 4 4 3 3 3
41 4 2 3 4 4 3
42 3 4 2 4 4 4
43 5 5 5 5 5 5
44 4 5 4 4 4 4
45 3 3 3 3 4 3
46 4 2 3 4 4 3
47 3 3 4 3 3 2
48 4 4 4 4 4 4
49 3 3 3 4 4 3
50 3 4 3 4 4 4
51 4 5 5 3 4 3
52 4 4 4 4 4 4
53 3 4 4 4 4 4
146
54 4 4 4 4 4 3
55 4 3 4 4 3 3
56 4 4 4 4 4 4
57 4 4 4 4 3 3
58 5 3 3 5 5 5
59 4 4 3 3 3 3
60 3 3 3 3 3 3
61 3 3 4 3 3 3
62 4 4 4 4 4 4
63 3 3 3 3 4 3
64 4 4 4 4 4 4
65 3 3 3 3 3 3
66 3 3 3 2 3 3
67 4 4 3 3 3 3
68 3 4 3 3 3 3
69 4 4 4 4 3 3
70 4 4 4 4 4 4
71 3 4 4 4 4 3
72 3 3 3 4 4 3
73 4 3 4 3 4 4
74 3 3 3 3 3 3
75 4 5 5 5 4 4
76 3 4 3 3 4 3
77 4 4 4 4 4 4
78 4 4 4 4 4 4
79 3 3 3 2 3 3
80 4 3 4 3 4 4
81 3 3 3 2 3 3
82 4 4 4 4 4 3
83 4 4 4 4 4 4
84 4 4 4 4 4 4
85 4 4 4 4 4 4
86 3 3 3 3 3 3
87 4 5 5 5 4 4
88 5 5 5 5 5 5
89 4 4 4 4 4 4
90 3 3 3 3 3 3
91 4 4 4 4 4 4
92 3 4 4 4 3 3
93 2 2 2 2 2 2
94 4 4 4 4 4 4
147
95 4 4 4 4 4 3
96 5 5 5 5 5 5
97 3 4 4 4 4 3
98 4 2 3 4 4 3
99 4 4 4 4 4 4
100 5 5 5 5 5 5
Respondent
Web Design
Q7 Q8 Q9
1 4 4 4
2 3 4 3
3 3 3 4
4 4 4 5
5 3 3 4
6 4 4 4
7 2 2 2
8 3 4 4
9 5 5 5
10 4 4 4
11 3 3 5
12 4 4 4
13 4 4 4
14 4 4 4
15 3 3 3
16 4 5 5
17 2 2 2
18 4 4 4
19 3 3 3
20 2 2 2
21 3 3 3
22 3 4 3
23 3 3 4
24 4 4 4
25 4 4 4
26 4 4 4
27 4 4 4
28 2 2 1
29 4 4 4
30 1 1 2
31 3 3 3
32 4 4 3
148
33 3 4 3
34 5 5 5
35 4 4 4
36 4 3 4
37 4 4 4
38 4 4 3
39 4 4 2
40 4 4 3
41 4 4 4
42 4 4 4
43 5 4 5
44 4 4 4
45 4 2 4
46 4 4 4
47 3 4 3
48 4 4 4
49 4 3 4
50 3 4 3
51 3 4 4
52 4 4 4
53 3 3 3
54 4 4 4
55 4 3 4
56 4 4 5
57 4 4 3
58 5 5 5
59 3 4 3
60 3 3 3
61 3 3 3
62 4 4 4
63 4 3 3
64 4 4 4
65 3 3 3
66 4 4 2
67 3 3 3
68 4 3 3
69 4 4 3
70 3 4 4
71 4 4 4
72 3 3 3
73 4 4 4
149
74 3 3 3
75 5 4 4
76 3 3 4
77 4 4 4
78 4 4 4
79 4 4 2
80 4 4 4
81 3 3 3
82 3 4 3
83 4 4 4
84 5 5 5
85 4 4 4
86 3 3 3
87 5 4 4
88 5 5 5
89 4 4 4
90 3 3 3
91 4 4 4
92 4 3 4
93 2 2 2
94 4 4 4
95 3 4 3
96 5 5 5
97 3 4 4
98 4 4 4
99 4 4 4
100 5 5 5
Respondent
Security
Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13
1 3 3 4 4
2 3 4 4 4
3 4 4 4 4
4 4 4 5 4
5 4 4 4 4
6 4 4 4 4
7 3 3 3 4
8 5 3 4 4
9 5 5 5 5
10 4 4 4 4
11 5 4 3 3
150
12 4 3 4 4
13 4 4 3 4
14 4 4 4 4
15 3 3 4 4
16 5 4 4 5
17 2 2 2 3
18 4 4 4 5
19 4 4 4 4
20 3 3 3 4
21 4 3 3 3
22 2 4 4 4
23 4 4 4 4
24 4 4 4 4
25 5 3 4 4
26 4 4 4 4
27 4 4 4 4
28 1 3 3 2
29 3 4 4 4
30 1 1 1 1
31 3 3 3 3
32 4 3 3 4
33 4 4 4 3
34 5 5 5 5
35 4 4 4 4
36 4 4 4 4
37 4 4 4 4
38 4 4 4 4
39 3 4 3 3
40 4 3 4 4
41 3 3 4 4
42 4 4 3 4
43 5 5 5 5
44 4 4 4 4
45 4 3 4 4
46 3 3 4 4
47 4 3 4 3
48 4 4 4 4
49 4 4 4 4
50 4 4 4 3
51 3 3 4 4
52 4 3 3 3
151
53 4 4 4 4
54 3 3 4 4
55 4 4 3 3
56 4 4 4 4
57 4 3 3 4
58 5 5 5 5
59 3 3 4 4
60 3 3 3 3
61 3 3 3 3
62 4 4 4 4
63 3 4 4 4
64 4 4 4 4
65 4 3 3 4
66 3 4 3 3
67 3 3 3 3
68 4 3 4 3
69 4 4 4 4
70 3 3 4 4
71 4 3 3 4
72 4 3 4 3
73 4 4 4 4
74 4 4 4 4
75 3 4 5 3
76 4 3 3 3
77 4 4 4 4
78 3 5 4 4
79 3 4 3 3
80 4 4 4 4
81 3 3 3 3
82 2 4 4 4
83 4 4 4 4
84 5 4 5 4
85 4 4 4 4
86 3 3 3 3
87 3 4 5 3
88 5 5 5 5
89 4 4 4 4
90 3 3 3 3
91 4 4 4 4
92 3 3 4 4
93 2 2 2 2
152
94 4 4 4 4
95 2 4 4 4
96 5 5 5 5
97 3 3 4 4
98 3 3 4 4
99 4 4 4 4
100 5 5 5 5
Respondent
Empathy
Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18
1 3 4 4 4 4
2 3 3 3 3 4
3 3 3 4 4 4
4 4 4 4 4 4
5 4 5 4 4 5
6 4 4 4 4 4
7 4 4 4 4 4
8 4 4 3 3 4
9 2 3 3 3 5
10 4 4 5 3 3
11 3 4 4 4 5
12 4 4 4 4 4
13 4 4 4 4 4
14 4 4 4 4 4
15 3 4 4 4 2
16 4 4 4 5 5
17 3 3 2 2 2
18 3 3 4 4 3
19 3 4 4 4 5
20 4 4 4 4 4
21 4 3 3 4 4
22 4 4 3 3 3
23 3 3 3 3 3
24 4 4 4 4 4
25 4 4 4 4 4
26 4 4 4 4 4
27 3 4 3 4 3
28 3 3 2 3 3
29 3 3 3 3 3
153
30 1 1 1 1 3
31 3 4 3 3 3
32 4 4 4 4 4
33 4 3 3 3 3
34 5 5 5 5 5
35 4 4 4 4 4
36 3 3 4 4 3
37 4 4 4 4 4
38 4 4 4 5 4
39 4 4 3 3 4
40 4 4 5 4 5
41 3 4 4 4 4
42 3 3 4 3 3
43 5 5 5 5 5
44 4 4 4 4 4
45 3 2 3 3 3
46 3 4 4 4 4
47 3 2 4 4 4
48 3 3 3 3 3
49 3 3 4 4 3
50 4 3 3 3 3
51 4 3 3 4 3
52 3 3 3 4 3
53 4 4 4 4 4
54 4 4 4 3 3
55 4 3 3 4 3
56 2 4 4 4 4
57 4 4 4 4 4
58 5 5 5 5 5
59 3 3 4 3 3
60 3 3 3 3 3
61 3 3 3 4 4
62 4 4 4 4 4
63 4 4 4 5 3
64 4 4 4 4 4
65 3 3 4 4 3
66 4 4 3 3 4
67 3 4 3 4 4
68 4 3 4 4 3
69 4 3 4 4 4
70 4 4 4 4 4
154
71 4 4 4 4 4
72 3 3 3 3 3
73 4 4 3 4 4
74 4 4 4 4 3
75 4 4 4 3 4
76 3 3 3 3 3
77 3 3 3 3 3
78 4 3 3 4 3
79 4 4 3 3 4
80 4 4 3 4 4
81 4 4 3 4 3
82 4 4 3 3 3
83 4 4 4 4 4
84 5 3 5 3 4
85 4 4 4 4 4
86 3 3 3 3 3
87 4 4 4 3 4
88 5 5 5 5 5
89 4 4 4 4 4
90 3 3 3 3 3
91 4 4 4 4 4
92 3 3 4 4 4
93 2 2 2 2 2
94 4 4 4 4 4
95 4 4 3 3 3
96 5 5 5 5 5
97 3 4 3 4 4
98 3 4 4 4 4
99 4 4 4 4 4
100 5 5 5 5 5
Respondent Responsiveness
Q19 Q20 Q21
1 4 4 4
2 3 3 3
3 2 2 3
4 4 4 4
5 5 4 4
6 4 4 4
7 2 2 2
155
8 4 5 4
9 5 5 4
10 5 5 5
11 4 3 4
12 4 4 3
13 4 3 3
14 3 4 4
15 3 3 3
16 4 4 5
17 2 2 3
18 3 4 3
19 5 5 5
20 2 2 2
21 3 3 3
22 2 3 3
23 3 3 3
24 4 4 4
25 3 4 4
26 3 4 4
27 4 3 4
28 3 3 3
29 4 3 3
30 2 1 2
31 3 3 3
32 3 4 4
33 3 3 3
34 5 5 5
35 4 4 4
36 3 3 3
37 4 4 3
38 4 4 4
39 3 4 2
40 4 5 4
41 3 4 4
42 3 3 4
43 5 5 5
44 4 4 4
45 2 2 2
46 3 4 4
47 4 4 4
48 3 3 3
156
49 3 3 3
50 3 3 3
51 3 3 3
52 3 3 3
53 4 4 4
54 3 3 3
55 4 4 4
56 4 4 4
57 3 4 4
58 5 5 5
59 3 4 4
60 3 3 3
61 4 4 4
62 4 4 4
63 3 3 3
64 4 4 4
65 3 3 3
66 3 4 2
67 3 3 3
68 3 3 3
69 4 4 4
70 3 4 3
71 4 3 3
72 3 3 3
73 5 4 3
74 4 4 4
75 4 4 4
76 3 3 3
77 3 3 3
78 4 4 3
79 3 4 2
80 5 4 3
81 3 3 3
82 2 3 3
83 4 4 4
84 3 3 4
85 4 4 4
86 3 3 3
87 4 4 4
88 5 5 5
89 4 4 4
157
90 3 3 3
91 4 4 4
92 3 3 3
93 2 2 2
94 4 4 4
95 2 3 3
96 5 5 5
97 4 4 3
98 3 4 4
99 4 4 4
100 5 5 5
Respondent
Purchase Intention
1 2 3 4
1 4 4 4 4
2 4 4 4 4
3 4 4 4 4
4 4 4 4 4
5 4 4 4 4
6 3 4 2 3
7 3 3 3 3
8 4 3 5 5
9 3 5 5 5
10 4 3 3 4
11 4 4 4 4
12 3 4 4 4
13 4 5 4 4
14 4 5 4 4
15 4 4 4 4
16 5 5 5 5
17 4 4 4 4
18 5 5 5 5
19 4 4 4 4
20 3 3 3 3
21 4 4 4 4
22 3 3 3 3
23 4 4 4 4
24 5 5 5 4
25 5 5 5 5
26 4 4 3 4
27 4 4 4 4
158
28 2 2 2 3
29 4 4 4 4
30 2 1 1 1
31 1 2 1 1
32 4 4 5 4
33 3 3 3 3
34 5 5 5 5
35 4 4 4 4
36 4 4 4 4
37 4 4 4 4
38 4 4 4 4
39 4 4 5 5
40 4 4 4 3
41 4 4 4 4
42 4 4 4 4
43 5 5 5 5
44 4 4 4 3
45 3 4 4 5
46 4 4 4 4
47 4 4 3 4
48 4 4 4 4
49 4 4 4 4
50 4 4 4 4
51 4 4 4 3
52 4 4 5 4
53 4 3 4 3
54 4 4 4 4
55 4 5 5 5
56 4 4 4 4
57 3 4 4 4
58 5 5 5 5
59 3 3 4 4
60 4 4 4 4
61 4 4 4 5
62 4 4 4 4
63 4 4 4 4
64 4 4 4 4
65 3 4 5 5
66 3 3 3 3
67 3 4 4 4
68 2 3 2 2
159
69 3 3 3 3
70 3 3 2 3
71 4 4 4 4
72 2 4 3 5
73 3 4 4 4
74 3 4 4 4
75 5 4 4 4
76 3 3 4 4
77 3 5 3 5
78 3 4 3 4
79 4 4 5 5
80 3 3 3 4
81 3 4 4 4
82 3 3 3 3
83 4 4 4 4
84 5 5 5 5
85 4 4 4 4
86 4 4 4 4
87 5 4 4 4
88 5 5 5 5
89 5 5 5 5
90 3 3 3 3
91 4 4 4 4
92 4 4 4 4
93 3 3 3 3
94 4 4 4 4
95 4 4 4 4
96 5 5 5 5
97 4 4 4 4
98 4 4 4 4
99 4 4 4 4
100 5 5 5 5
160
Appendix 3 : Characteristics of Respondents from SPSS
Appendix 4: Validity and Reliability Test
Questions r-count r-table Result
e-Word-of-Mouth
e-WOM Quality 1 0.882 0.361 Valid
e-WOM Quality 2 0.819 0.361 Valid
e-WOM Quality 3 0.855 0.361 Valid
e-WOM Quality 4 0.877 0.361 Valid
e-WOM Quantity 1 0.796 0.361 Valid
e-WOM Quantity 2 0.677 0.361 Valid
e-WOM Quantity 3 0.772 0.361 Valid
e-WOM Quantity 4 0.768 0.361 Valid
e-WOM Sender' Expertise 1 0.820 0.361 Valid
e-WOM Sender' Expertise 2 0.779 0.361 Valid
e-WOM Sender' Expertise 3 0.798 0.361 Valid
e-WOM Sender' Expertise 4 0.841 0.361 Valid
e-Service Quality
e-SQ Reliability 1 0.720 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Reliability 2 0.708 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Reliability 3 0.847 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Reliability 4 0.855 0.361 Valid
Age
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
<20 10 10,0 10,0 10,0
20-<35 89 89,0 89,0 99,0
35-<50 1 1,0 1,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
Gender
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
Male 43 43,0 43,0 43,0
Female 57 57,0 57,0 100,0
Total 100 100,0 100,0
161
e-SQ Reliability 5 0.761 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Reliability 6 0.787 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Website Design 1 0.858 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Website Design 2 0.846 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Website Design 3 0.829 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Security 1 0.832 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Security 2 0.807 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Security 3 0.846 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Security 4 0.787 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Empathy 1 0.495 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Empathy 2 0.675 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Empathy 3 0.751 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Empathy 4 0.680 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Empathy 5 0.583 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Responsiveness 1 0.713 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Responsiveness 2 0.818 0.361 Valid
e-SQ Responsiveness 3 0.749 0.361 Valid
Purchase Intention
Purchase Intention 1 0.889 0.361 Valid
Purchase Intention 2 0.907 0.361 Valid
Purchase Intention 3 0.952 0.361 Valid
Purchase Intention 4 0.935 0.361 Valid
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha N of Items
,951 12
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha N of Items
,962 21
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha N of Items
,938 4
162
Appendix 5 : Output SPPS
163
One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Unstandardize
d Residual
N 100
Normal
Parametersa,b
Mean 0E-7
Std.
Deviation 1,94591539
Most Extreme
Differences
Absolute ,122
Positive ,098
Negative -,122
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z 1,224
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) ,100
a. Test distribution is Normal.
b. Calculated from data.
Coefficientsa
Model Unstandardized
Coefficients
Standar
dized
Coefficie
nts
t Sig. Collinearity
Statistics
B Std.
Error
Beta Toleran
ce
VIF
1
(Const
ant) 1,846 1,393
1,325 ,188
e-
WOM ,194 ,042 ,482 4,649 ,000 ,470 2,129
e-SQ ,067 ,025 ,283 2,733 ,007 ,470 2,129
a. Dependent Variable: Purchase Intention
164
Coefficientsa
Model Unstandardized
Coefficients
Standardize
d
Coefficients
t Sig.
B Std. Error Beta
1
(Constant
) 1,846 1,393
1,325 ,188
e-WOM ,194 ,042 ,482 4,649 ,000
e-SQ ,067 ,025 ,283 2,733 ,007
a. Dependent Variable: Purchase Intention
Model Summaryb
Model R R Square Adjusted R
Square
Std. Error of
the Estimate
1 ,715a ,511 ,501 1,966
165
a. Predictors: (Constant), esq, ewom
b. Dependent Variable: pi
ANOVAa
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1
Regression 391,488 2 195,744 50,650 ,000b
Residual 374,872 97 3,865
Total 766,360 99
a. Dependent Variable: pi
b. Predictors: (Constant), esq, ewom
Coefficientsa
Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized
Coefficients
t Sig.
B Std. Error Beta
1
(Constant) 1,846 1,393
1,325 ,188
ewom ,194 ,042 ,482 4,649 ,000
esq ,067 ,025 ,283 2,733 ,007
a. Dependent Variable: pi