the information shown is based on the ankc breed standard...the doberman was permitted to appear...
TRANSCRIPT
The information shown
is based on the ANKC
Breed Standard Please note that many cropped
ear dogs are used as examples
to illustrate various properties
in the breed, however the
cropping of ears is not
permitted in Australia
German Pinschers are not small Dobermans or large
Min Pins. The Standard Schnauzer is the relation to
which the German Pinscher is connected.
Early sketches show clearly how similar these two
breeds once were. Time and breeding practices have
since separated the “look” to a degree but the genetic
foundations remain connected.
HISTORY
The 3 Pinscher breeds.
The German Pinscher can
lay claim to be some of
the foundation for the
others.
The German
Pinscher took back
some of the genetic
material offered in
the mid fifties when
Herr Werner Jung
brought the breed
back from the brink
of extinction with
the introduction of
three Miniature
Pinschers.
One of the first Werner Jung
Pinschers produced during the
rebuilding of this breed. Note
the Min Pin influence in the
head and bone.
Back from the Brink
By the mid 1950’s the German
Pinscher was so rare it was thought
in some areas to be extinct. Herr
Jung, at the time a Standard
Schnauzer breeder of reputation,
took it upon himself to try to bring
back the breed. Finding a bitch of
good quality in East Germany, he
risked his safety to secret her
across the border. Once safely in
his care, he bred her and her future
offspring with three Miniature
Pinschers that had more German
Pinscher structure and were large
for their breed.
Shown above is “Jutta”, one of
the Miniature Pinschers used
to help bring back the breed
from the brink of extinction.
She was bred back to a
number of her grandsons
which either were related
directly to the German
Pinscher bitch “Kitti V
Bodenstrand” or the other two
male Min Pins. In spite of the
fact she was a Min Pin, when
bred to the other Min Pins, the
offspring were registered as
German Pinscher.
This German Pinscher circa 1958 (name unknown) was the product of a
very tight inbreeding program with the Min Pins. The rounder eyes and
fuller cheeks are still apparent in some of the German Pinschers of today.
Adding to the gene pool
The black Doberman bitch
“Evi Von Den Edeltanne”
was bred to bred to the
German Pinscher “Fips
Vom Nordkristall late 1989
with the intent on
increasing size in the
German Pinschers as they
had become exceedingly
small. This breeding was
sanctioned by the
Pinscher-Schnauzer club
of Germany with the intent
on doing it twice more to
different males. This never
occurred and Linda Vom
Nordkristall, registered as
F1 carried the Doberman
genes forward.
The above pictured male is
a great grandson of “Evi”.
The Doberman was
permitted to appear only
the one time in his
pedigree. He is F4 and
considered fully German
Pinscher. He has gone on
to sire litters of his own.
The desire to increase size was a success, bringing the
average dog in that particular pedigree from an
average of 42-46cm (16.5” to 18.25”) to 47-52cm(18.5”
to 20.5”). As well most German Pinschers descending
from this line typically have more fore chest, something
that the breed continues to struggle with. It should be
noted however that as shown in the dog above, too
much sterum projection is not considered correct as
the standard states “Forechest extends beyond point of
shoulder” Dogs with excessive fronts similar to a
Dobermann are not to be considered correct.
Pinscher-Schnauzer
Standard Schnauzer “Balthazar V
Achterplatzchen” was bred to
German Pinscher bitch “Yarracitta
Ipanapapanetta” in a sanctioned
breeding by the National registry
in Finland in 1998 with the desire
to introduce more genetic material
into a very small gene pool as well
as tone down the ‘fire’ often found
in the smooth cousin. The year
before (1997) a Standard
Schnauzer bitch “Argentas
Pollyanna” was bred to a German
Pinscher male “Yarracitta
Retticarudolph”.
Only the best structured offspring
of both breedings were kept with
the understanding that the two
pedigrees would never be
permitted to cross over prior to
F4.
This F3 (above) of the 1998 mating,
when bred, will produce what is
considered to be ‘pure’ German
Pinschers. Note the grizzling in
colour and what is clearly not black.
To the right is the littermate. Again
note the colour as not fitting the
standard however overall the dogs
structure is quite adequate. The
offspring of these two breedings
have been closely watched and
guarded to ensure that they are used
to the best of their genetic ability to
improve the overall quality of the
breed. None of these offspring have
been imported to North America at
this time, however this may change
with the F4 generation should they
be of good quality.
General Appearance
“Overall length in proportion to back (from withers to base of tail)
is approximately 1:2.”
A dog of substantial substance and yet remaining visually
streamlined and athletic in appearance. Lack of bone creating a
deer like frame is undesirable.
“Free, well balanced and vigorous with good reach in front and
strong rotary driving action from rear. Front and hind legs should
not be thrown outwards.”
Hackney gait should be severely penalized.
.
Temperament
“High spirited and self-
possessed. “
Aggression towards other dogs although sometimes occurring within same gendered dogs should be severely penalized as a whole. Aggression towards humans is unacceptable. This breed tends to maintain eye contact. This is normal and not considered to be a challenge to humans. Failure to stand for exam or be judged thoroughly is also considered inappropriate for the breed. Puppies can be allowed some leniency however it is up to the judge to determine if non compliance is a temperament issue or lack of training and act accordingly. Judges should excuse any dogs for this if done to excess
Size
43-48 cms (17-19 ins) at withers
It is recommended that females be at the lower end of
the size range, whilst the males at the upper
measurements. Variations within this range to be
penalized according to their severity.
Bitches and Dogs should have a weight appropriate to
their size to allow for a moderate looking dog that would
appear neither too lean or ribby or out of condition
without definition of muscle tone.
Dogs should be judged proportionately if outside these
ideals.
Male-19” Female-18”
Neither gender should be so
heavy as to appear overweight
or lacking agility during motion
.
Dogs carrying less weight that
appears to show rib, hip or
excessive tuck up, should also
be penalized appropriately.
Bitches having litters should
not be penalized for their
matronly appearance unless it
is in excess.
No dog out of condition should
be rewarded at any level.
Red should not be so light as to appear Fawn in colour.
Stag red should not show a distinct “saddle”*
Colour
*Photo digitally
enhanced for
explanation
.
Mahogany red is the preferred for the black bi-
colour.
Markings only take
precedence when equal
examples are being
shown. Mismarked
front triangles on black
dogs must be penalized
when equal examples
are shown.
More than a few white hairs
is considered a fault.
Muzzles may become
whiter in older dogs and
should not be penalized.
White hairs from injury not
to be penalized.
There should be no preference between colours during
competition and only be given consideration if equal
examples are being shown; the preference would then
be given to the animal showing the deeper red or
clearer colour.
Fawn black and tan blue and tan red
THE ANKC STANDARD ALLOWS FOR BLACK
WITH RED MARKINGS, CLEAR RED OR STAG
RED, BLUE WITH TAN MARKINGS AND FAWN
(ISABELLA) TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR COMPETITION
IN CONFORMATION.
Head
View the
head from
above and
from the
side to
determine if
the correct
blunt wedge
shape is
evident.
Width of the
muzzle
must be
considered
an
important
aspect, with
the penalty
being laid
for a narrow
or short
muzzle.
Females will not carry as wide a muzzle and should be judged
according to their gender. Full under jaw is required while
maintaining correct scissor bite.
Top of skull and muzzle present parallel lines. Stop is slight
but distinct.
Cropped ears are not
permitted to be shown.
Natural folded ears
should not fly back.
“Set high. V shaped,
folded down close to
head.” Ears should not
lay flat against the head
and be ‘hound-like’
“Dark, of medium size, oval and directed forward. Eye rims tight.”
Round eyes should be penalized as are light colour eyes. Red dogs may have somewhat lighter eyes and this should be taken into account when judging. It is not a fault unless it is extreme. Oval eyes are desired but not so far as to be called almond shaped.
Dogs showing excessive cheek or no indentation from
muzzle to skull should be penalized.
The head should NOT appear like a Doberman or a
Miniature Pinscher in shape or outline.
Neck
Exhibitors will often stack and/or bait dogs with heads
held too high, resulting in a ridge where the neck
meets the shoulder.
Dogs should gait with the head at approximately 45
degree angle to the body. It should not be level when
in motion nor held overly upward.
Due to the topline not being required to be level (see
“Body”) there will be a dip where the neck meets the
shoulder but there should not be a roll or ridge
indicating too sharp of a connection between neck and
shoulder or too straight of a shoulder.
A B C
Forequarters
“Well laid shoulder
with good but flat
muscle. Forelegs
straight viewed from
all sides, parallel
elbows are close to
body.”
Desired layback is 45
degrees. Straight
shoulders should be
penalized. Flat front
feet or splayed feet
should be penalized
severely. Nails kept
very short and should
not touch the ground
during movement. Over muscling of the front
to be penalized. There
should be no ‘thumbprints’
as found in Manchester
Terriers. Small amounts of
“penciling” are permitted
however; black toes should
be penalized as a colour
fault. White on the toes is
considered a fault.
Body
“Chest moderately wide with flat ribs. Brisket extends below
elbow. Forechest extends beyond point of shoulder. Compact and
short coupled. Length of body approximately equal to height at
withers. Back short and slightly sloping. Slightly rounded croup.”
The rise in the croup should be evident more on the move than in
a stacked position along with the tail set to be judged more
correctly whilst on the move. Failure to carry the tail up during
motion should be penalized. A flat topline without rise to the
croup should be penalized. A sloping topline should also be
penalized to the degree of the slope during motion. The overall
appearance of the dog must remain in balance and be
square. Dogs appearing too long in leg or too short in leg
regardless of squareness must be penalized to the degree of
deviation.
Bitches may be slightly longer in body and still be
considered. Tuck up is minimal and dogs showing no
tuck up must be penalized as being out of condition.
The back is measured from the withers to the tail
set, should be twice that as the length of the head,
measured from the tip of the nose to the occiput.
The height of the dog should be measured from the
ground to the withers.
The visual square appears as a line down the back of
the front legs and a line drawn from the furthest
point in the hindquarters.
Hindquarters
“Seen from behind parallel, with sufficient width. Upper thigh slanted
and strongly muscled. Good length and bend of stifle, hocks turning
neither in nor out.”
Turn of stifle must be apparent as well as angle to hock. Straight
hindquarters must be severely penalized. (lower left) Exhibitors must
be encouraged not to over extend their dogs back legs resulting in the
appearance of lack of stifle and hock angulation. Hocks must be
perpendicular to the ground and placement should be just beyond the
furthest point of the dogs’ rear and not placed under the dog. A line
drawn from the furthest point in the rear downward should just touch
the toes or be slightly in front of the back feet if the hocks are
perpendicular to the ground. Over angulation should be penalized
(lower right)
Tail
Tail should be carried, when in motion, at the 2 o’clock position or
higher but never so high as to appear over the back. Hooked tails, or touching the back or sides to be faulted. Tails with abnormal vertebrae should be considered faulty.
` “Docked: Docked to three
[3] joints. Set and carried high. Undocked: Set and carried high with an upward sweep. In overall balance with the rest of the dog.”
Length of tail (cropped or
natural) should not be penalized either for long or short unless at its most severe.
Faults
Any departure from the foregoing points should be
considered a fault and the seriousness with which the fault
should be regarded should be in exact proportion to its
degree.
Credits
Some images have been digitally altered to remove backgrounds however no image has been changed in regards to structure.
Special thanks to:
•Kerry Thorbourne
•Cindy-Lee Campbell
•Walt Norris
•Pia Widerberg
•Jill Eastman
•Heather Harrell
For their photography talents with
many of the images shown in this
presentation.