the interventional perspective: long ... - neurovasc exchange · caress study • no difference in...
TRANSCRIPT
The Interventional Perspective: Long Term Data on Carotid Stenting
Supports Its Efficacy In Stroke Prevention
Emerging And Novel Insights From CaRESS, SAPPHIRE. ARCHeR And Others
Subbarao Myla MD, FACC, FSCAIHoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
Newport Beach, CA, USA
Disclosures
• Research Grant Support: Johnson & Johnson, Boston Scientific, Endotex, eV3, CR
Bard, Abbott, Lumen Bio
• Consultant, Scientific Advisory Board member Johnson & Johnson, Boston Scientific, Lumen Bio
• Stockholder Boston Scientific, Lumen Bio
Objectives
• Is CAS Durable? In Stroke Prevention?
• Compared to what? CEA or Medical RX• In which patient groups?
In Maintaining Patency?• Restenosis• Role in stroke• Issues With Carotid Duplex
Historical, Randomized And Registry Trials
• Medical Therapy• NASCET. ACAS. • ECST. ACST• CAVATAS• SAPPHIRE, ARCHER. CaRESS• SPACE, EVA 3S• CREST lead In
No Comparator For Medical Therapy In High Risk Patients
Successful Technology Transfer with improving Learning Curve
Long Term Stroke Risk
SPACE
3.9
9.6
0
5
10
15
20
Primary Endpoint
30 d
ay d
eath
and
str
oke
(%)
CEA CAS
EVA-3S: Randomized CEA vs. CAS
RR 2.5 (95% CI, 1.2-5.1) P=0.01
262262 265265
Mas JL et al. New Engl J Med 2006;355:1661-71Mas JL et al. New Engl J Med 2006;355:1661-71
EVA 3S Study
Mas JL et al, Lancet September 2008Mas JL et al, Lancet September 2008
CARESS STUDY
• No difference in Any Stroke between Surgery or stent at 30 days or 4 yrs.
• Interval CEA Stent P• 30 days 2.2% 2.0% NS• 4 yrs 9.6% 8.6% NS
JVS2005, C.Zarins TCT 2009 Oct 11th 2008
CREST RESTENOSIS
Helmut Lutsup for CREST Investigators 2007
Helmut Lutsup for CREST Investigators 2007
CREST RESTENOSIS
CREST RESTENOSIS
Helmut Lutsup for CREST Investigators 2007
CARESS RESTENOSIS
• Baseline characteristics Impacting Restenosis.
• Restenosis as Inclusion Criteria CEA 11%CAS 36% P < 0.001
JVS2005, C.Zarins TCT 2009 Oct 11th 2008
• 4 yr Restenosis by Duplex/ Angiography • Procedure CEA CAS P
Restenosis 5.9% 14.7% 0.01 Repeat Angio 5.1% 11.2% 0.05 TVR 2.18% 5.6% 0.26
• Hawthorne Effect• More angiography triggers more TVR• Duplex Criteria?
JVS2005, C. Zarins TCT 2009 Oct 11th 2008
CARESS RESTENOSIS
• Restenosis by Duplex/ Angiography • Procedure I yr 4 yr
CEA 3.6% 5.9%CAS 6.3% 14.7%
P < 0.001
JVS2005, C. Zarins TCT 2009 Oct 11th 2008
CARESS RESTENOSIS
Is Restenosis Stent Dependent?
New Criteria PSV >217cm/s or ICA/CCA Ratio >2.98 Predicts >50% Stenosis
Conclusions
• CAS is a durable procedure in Stroke Prevention and maintaining Patency
• CAS Restenosis is a benign uncommon event.
• Carotid Duplex Criteria for CAS follow up need validation