the lawson performance review (lpr) identifying quick wins and initiatives to maximise the m3...

27
The Lawson Performance Review (LPR) Identifying quick wins and initiatives to maximise the M3 implementation

Upload: megan-todd

Post on 26-Mar-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Lawson Performance Review (LPR) Identifying quick wins and initiatives to maximise the M3 implementation

The Lawson Performance Review (LPR)

Identifying quick wins and initiatives to maximise the M3 implementation

Page 2: The Lawson Performance Review (LPR) Identifying quick wins and initiatives to maximise the M3 implementation

Fuaad Buras

Professional Services Director

Page 3: The Lawson Performance Review (LPR) Identifying quick wins and initiatives to maximise the M3 implementation

Presentation Aim

Update you on the LPR product which I launched in the LUA UK 2010...

... Key Lessons / Messages from a number of customersas a result of these M3 reviews

Page 4: The Lawson Performance Review (LPR) Identifying quick wins and initiatives to maximise the M3 implementation

Presentation Content

The LPR Launch... 5 minutes

Recent LPR Examples... 10 minutes

Key Messages from LPRs conducted... 5 minutes

Q&A ... 5 minutes

Totalamber Changes... 5 minutes

Page 5: The Lawson Performance Review (LPR) Identifying quick wins and initiatives to maximise the M3 implementation

Think Replace

Market Research

Products& Services

Go To Market

Workshops& Webex

Onsite Review

CBAProposal Delivery

AccountDevelopment

Software Vendors

Technology

Partners

CoREConsultant

s

Clients

TotalamberPillars

Totalamber Lawson CoRE

Totalamber UNIT4 CoRE

Totalamber IFS CoRE

WebQuarters®

Totalamber Support Centre

We have changed as a business ...

Implement & Support

Productised Service Offerings

5

Page 6: The Lawson Performance Review (LPR) Identifying quick wins and initiatives to maximise the M3 implementation

David HartshorneDirector of Support

Services

Technical Consultant

Business AnalystReport Writer

System Administrator

HelpdeskAdministrator

Full time staff Remote Support Onsite Support Systems Administration SLAs Working with vendors and users

We have created a support centre ...

6

Page 7: The Lawson Performance Review (LPR) Identifying quick wins and initiatives to maximise the M3 implementation

Nick DevineDirector of Lawson

Services

Sales Support Market Researcher

Lawson Pre-Sales

Professional Services

Totalamber Lawson CoRE Team

Lawson Business Unit ...

7

Page 8: The Lawson Performance Review (LPR) Identifying quick wins and initiatives to maximise the M3 implementation

Presentation Content

The LPR Launch...

Recent LPR Examples...

Key Messages from LPRs conducted...

Q&A ...

Totalamber Developments ...

Page 9: The Lawson Performance Review (LPR) Identifying quick wins and initiatives to maximise the M3 implementation

The Lawson Performance Review (LPR) checks if M3 is configured appropriately to meet the business needs – its strategy, processes and people.

An impartial fit-gap assessment

Roadmap for change – enhance, upgrade or re-evaluate

LPR

What is LPR?

Typical LPR Structure:

One to two days on site (depending on scope / complexity)One to two days write upHalf day Presentation & Agreeing Next Steps

Page 10: The Lawson Performance Review (LPR) Identifying quick wins and initiatives to maximise the M3 implementation

People

Local Culture Languages Skill Sets Buy-in Roles & Responsibilities

Business

Market Strategy – Products / Services Customers Strategy Key Priorities Constraints Entities Performance Measures

LawsonM3 Delivery Model – e.g. SaaS

Modules Infrastructure Operating System Database Customisations Integration Information Reporting

Processes

Business Development Project Mgt Manufacturing Services Fulfilment Logistics Finance Customer Service Quality Assurance Human Resources

M3 Landscape – Issues, Quick Wins & Initiatives

LPRBALANCING

ACT

Page 11: The Lawson Performance Review (LPR) Identifying quick wins and initiatives to maximise the M3 implementation

BUSINESS

Model KPIs Sites

Entities Local Regulations

Priorities

PEOPLE

Culture Roles Skill sets

Training Buy-in Capacity

M3

Modules Hardware Database

Information Network Support

PROCESSES

Departments

Policies Procedures

Flows Rules Controls

LPR Area LPR Validation Score

(1) Business Strategy

•Company Vision•Market Strategy•Functional Objectives•Measures

(2) Interaction Channels

•Customer Channels•Employee Channels•Supplier Channels•Partner Channels

(3) People •Buy-in•Ownership•Roles•Structures

(4) Business processes

•Definition•Documentation•Rules•Controls

(5) Information Management

•Master Data•Meta Data•Reports•Business Intelligence

(6) Integration Management

•Process Integration•Data Consolidation•Legacy Interfacing

The LPR Layers

Page 12: The Lawson Performance Review (LPR) Identifying quick wins and initiatives to maximise the M3 implementation

BUSINESS

Model KPIs Sites

Entities Local Regulations

Priorities

PEOPLE

Culture Roles Skill sets

Training Buy-in Capacity

M3

Modules Hardware Database

Information Network Support

PROCESSES

Departments

Policies Procedures

Flows Rules Controls

LPR Area LPR Validation Score

(7) IT Strategy Operating ModelsIT ArchitectureHardwareDatabasesSupport Organisation

(8) Lawson ERP ModulesInteraction TypesUsers ProfilesSecurity StrategyTechnologiesMiddlewareData ArchitectureReporting ToolsDevelopmentConfigurationUpgrade Path

The LPR Layers

Page 13: The Lawson Performance Review (LPR) Identifying quick wins and initiatives to maximise the M3 implementation

Enhance

Upgrade

Re-evaluate

Quick Wins

Initiatives

Define Set up Build & Test Rollout Support

Requirements Selection Contractual

Simplify GUISmart OfficeSearchQueries Module Implementation

Documentation MgtReporting ImprovementsTechnical TuningProcess Streamlines

FeasibilityProcessPlanGovernance

HardwareSoftwareDatabaseDataBusiness rules

ConfigurationReportsCustomisationIntegrationUAT

TrainingData CutoverLiveHandholding

HelpdeskDROperationsProjectsNew Joiners

Evaluation

BusinessProcessTechnicalPeoplePlans

RFIRFPMarket ResearchDemos

Due DiligenceNegotiationsDecision makingCommunications

Terms & conditionsLegalPayment

Users Education

Hours/Days

Weeks/Months

LPR

Customer Options

Page 14: The Lawson Performance Review (LPR) Identifying quick wins and initiatives to maximise the M3 implementation

Presentation Content

The LPR Launch...

Recent LPR Examples...

Key Messages from LPRs conducted...

Q&A ...

Totalamber Developments ...

Page 15: The Lawson Performance Review (LPR) Identifying quick wins and initiatives to maximise the M3 implementation

Met the business and IT managers / sponsors for an hour

Set up interviews (1 hour long) with each business key user / process owner where we:

Asked about the processes and related issues

Checked the M3 configurations – check data / screens / outputs

Highlighted potential alternative solutions – quick wins / initiatives

Day

1

Documented the 20-30 quick wins and 4-8 initiatives with estimates and owners

Validated the quick wins and initiatives list with the business and IT sponsors

Documented the final report giving improvement plan and costs

Day

2

Present the full report to stakeholders

Commence improvements – quick wins / plan initiativesDay

3

How did the LPRs go?

Page 16: The Lawson Performance Review (LPR) Identifying quick wins and initiatives to maximise the M3 implementation

LPR Output 1: Validation of AS-IS & TO-BE

Page 17: The Lawson Performance Review (LPR) Identifying quick wins and initiatives to maximise the M3 implementation

DiamondMethodology

“AS IS” – Understanding & Capturing the landscape

Implemented M3 few years ago with promise to enhance usability after Go-Live

Business changed since initial implementation – e.g. Becoming more project based

No KPIs agreed – too many reports but little measurement and improvements

Inconsistency of implementation between sites / regions (moving away from blueprint)

No process flow, maps or docs

Teams working in silos

Limited appreciation of process and M3 touch points

No up-to-date mods documentation

Difficulty in audit trail – back tracking a process / data

Very few people know how the current system is set-up

Key individuals left the organisation

No formal training was provided to the workforce

Limited level of confidence in data / M3 – slave to system

M3 is under utilised: 50%-65% of functionality is still unused

Several major and relevant M3 modules & features not understood (e.g. MOM)

Too many manual systems and interventions – spreadsheets and databases still used

(Finance Controller) spends too much time consolidating data and filling gaps

EXAMPLE

Page 18: The Lawson Performance Review (LPR) Identifying quick wins and initiatives to maximise the M3 implementation

DiamondMethodology

“TO BE” – where the organisation needs to be with M3?

Senior Sponsors – Introduce and cement the right management and culture (e.g. Project Oriented)

M3 for new business model - Redefine and re-configure M3 to support new changes

Measure & manage each business activities - Formalise KPI and link to new processes

Regional capabilities - Group standards vs. Local site requirements

Raise M3 Confidence - Raise team awareness of what is available in M3

M3 Training - full team and develop tailored training sessions (2-3 hours each session)

Involvement – Get more people involved in shaping M3 and its use going forward

Automation of integration - Automated feeds between M3 and external systems

New Modules / Capabilities – Implement new capabilities to minimise manual interventions (e.g. E-Invoicing)

Shop Floor Data Capture - Implement the M3 data capture (touch screen)

Efficiencies - Streamline processes between teams

Update guidelines – update manuals to meet new approach

Integrated Plan - Process to manage a single plan detailing all project activities

Track project time - Time recording policy and processes to calculate true project costs

EXAMPLE

Page 19: The Lawson Performance Review (LPR) Identifying quick wins and initiatives to maximise the M3 implementation

LPR Output 2: Quick Wins & Initiatives SummariesWhat?

Benefits?How?

Effort? (Cost)

Page 20: The Lawson Performance Review (LPR) Identifying quick wins and initiatives to maximise the M3 implementation

20 to 30 Quick wins / 4 to 8 initiatives

# Quick Win Quick Win Description

Implementation Benefits

Set Up / Activities

TA Effort

Business

Priority

1 Demand Planner – a number of (12) customers not coming through

Review of setup/config to identify why these customers do not get included from Sales Statistics

Full, complete Demand Planner database to support forecasting

InvestigateCommunicateCorrect

4 hrs

1

2 Email Orders via email

Ability to email order confirmations through appropriate Streamserve setup

Improved efficiency reduced postage/stationery costs.

Set up server / Educate users / Configure Email / Test Script / Engage supplier

4 hrs

2

Total man-days xx

EXAMPLE

Page 21: The Lawson Performance Review (LPR) Identifying quick wins and initiatives to maximise the M3 implementation

LPR Output 3: Improvement Approach & Roadmap

Page 22: The Lawson Performance Review (LPR) Identifying quick wins and initiatives to maximise the M3 implementation

We proposed two strands of work – (1) Quick Win Strand - to raise confidence and improve M3 usability in the short term and (2) longer term Improvement Initiatives Strand to implement necessary M3 functionality/modules (e.g. Upgrade Initiative)

“Raising Confidence in M3”Role-based Tailored Training

“Streamlining Processes”Process Definition

Additional Quick Wins(Based on priorities)

“Improving M3 know-how / Raising user confidence / Simplifying processes / Implementing new functionality

Quick Wins: Part 1 Quick Wins: Part 2 Quick Wins: Part 3

Strand 1

Improvements InitiativeKick off

(Based on priorities)

ImprovementInitiatives

Review and plan M3 improvement Initiatives

Strand 2

EXAMPLE

Page 23: The Lawson Performance Review (LPR) Identifying quick wins and initiatives to maximise the M3 implementation

Everyone would benefit from an overall M3 presentation to show what is possible and how best to navigate and simplify the M3 tool.

“Raising Confidence”M3 Training – Tips & Tricks (3 hours)

Target Attendees: All M3 UsersType: Presentation / Demo / hands-onAim: Raise Awareness / Confidence

Topics Covered:

1. Structure of M3 Workplace2. Working with Workplace User Settings3. Using the Navigator4. Launching and working with M3 Content5. M3 Companion6. Working with User Personalisation

Defaults7. Working with Basic Panel Functions8. Working with the “P” Settings9. Panel Sequences10. Panel Actions11. Working with Text Panels12. Exercises

! A set of eight (3 hour) sessions would be scheduled to allow the users to book into a suitable slotduring week 1.

“Raising Confidence in M3”Role-based Tailored Training

EXAMPLE

Page 24: The Lawson Performance Review (LPR) Identifying quick wins and initiatives to maximise the M3 implementation

Overall Quick Wins & Initiatives Roadmap

ProjectMobilisation

Quick WinPart 1

Quick WinPart 2

Quick WinPart 3

Improvement Initiatives

1st Sep10 8th Sep10 15th Sep10 10th Oct10 16th Mar11

£1.5K £3.9K £4.1K £7.8K £17.5K

Total Investment: £34.8K

EXAMPLE

Page 25: The Lawson Performance Review (LPR) Identifying quick wins and initiatives to maximise the M3 implementation

Presentation Content

The LPR Launch...

Recent LPR Examples...

Key Messages from LPRs conducted...

Q&A ...

Totalamber Developments ...

Page 26: The Lawson Performance Review (LPR) Identifying quick wins and initiatives to maximise the M3 implementation

My Messages & Lessons...

1) Initial Implementation is not always perfect! – calibration is needed

2) User Training is not sufficient – targeted role/task based education is needed

3) M3 is not appreciated – not surprise because of the above two points factor

4) Key users need coaching and training – as key implementation personnel left

6) Still too many spreadsheets and manual interventions

5) End to end process need streamlining to remove duplication and redundancy

7) M3 support need to be enhanced to deal with business demands and expectations

8) Senior management and sponsors needed to secure improvement and M3 direction

9) M3 Inductions to new joiners is hardly given – so no wonder bad habits being picked up

Page 27: The Lawson Performance Review (LPR) Identifying quick wins and initiatives to maximise the M3 implementation

Presentation Content

The LPR Launch...

Recent LPR Examples...

Key Messages from LPRs conducted...

Q&A ...

Totalamber Developments ...