the leader evaluation and professional growth program
DESCRIPTION
The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program. Module 2: Interpreting Performance and Providing Feedback. Agenda. Welcome and Connecting (45 minutes) Welcome Intended Outcomes Connecting the Dots to Reach a Summative Rating Learning (120 minutes) - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
January 2014
The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth ProgramModule 2: Interpreting Performance and Providing Feedback
![Page 2: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Welcome and Connecting (45 minutes)• Welcome• Intended Outcomes• Connecting the Dots to Reach a Summative Rating
Learning (120 minutes)• Characteristics of Effective Feedback• Evaluator Roles in Providing Feedback• A Video Exemplar• Feedback Carousel• Video Practice: Providing Feedback
Implementing (60 minutes)• 360-Degree Survey Options• Planning for Survey Implementation
Follow-up (15 minutes)
Agenda
![Page 3: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Welcome and Connecting45 minutes
![Page 4: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Please share your name, your district, and an update on the principal observations.• How are they going?• What is one big thing you have learned?
Welcome
![Page 5: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Teacher postobservation conferences are a critical link!• Connect evidence and ratings to concrete changes in instruction and
their impact on student learning• Crucial opportunity for teachers to reflect and collaborate to identify
strategies to improve• Rare opportunity for principals and teachers to engage in an in-
depth, highly analytical discussion centered on instructional practice
Instructional Feedback: What the Research Tells Us
5
References: Balcazar, F., Hopkins, B. L., & Suarez, Y. (1986). A critical objective review of performance feedback. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 7(3/4), 65–89; Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1998). Feedback interventions: Toward the understanding of a double-edged sword. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 67–72; Shute, V. (2007). Focus on formative feedback (Research report). Princeton, NJ: ETS. Retrieved from http://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/RR-07-11.pdf
![Page 6: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Principals vary widely in their skill and ability in providing instructional coaching and feedback; many struggle with:• Asking high-level questions. • Prompting teacher reflection.• Ensuring a balanced or teacher-driven conversation. • Identifying and modeling concrete, actionable changes in
practice.• Connecting feedback to individualized supports and professional
growth planning.
Principals need training, support, and ongoing coaching to provide high-quality instructional feedback.
Instructional Feedback: What the Research Tells Us
6
![Page 7: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
At the end of this session, participants will know and be able to:• Describe how multiple sources of evidence in the Leader Evaluation and
Professional Growth (LEPG) program combine for a summative rating of principal performance.
• Construct meaningful feedback aligned to principals’ areas for improvement.• Understand and utilize the tools for the observation process and evidence
collection.
Intended Outcomes
![Page 8: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Module 1: Principal Observation Process Module 2: Interpreting Performance and Providing
FeedbackParticipants will review the entire LEPG process that results in a summative rating and consider two options for the 360-degree survey instrument as one source of evidence. We will analyze observation data gathered to date and strategize about how to interpret these data and provide appropriate and meaningful feedback to principals.
Module 3: Making Sense of Evidence Module 4: Responding to High-Priority Needs
Module 2: Interpreting Performance and Providing Feedback
![Page 9: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
LEPG Summative RatingTIF 4 Example
9
Professional Practice Professional Growth School Conditions School Growth Learner Growth
MeasuresPerformance on standards 1-8 of the MSFE LEPG Rubric
Performance on Standard 9 of the MSFE LEPG Rubric
Teachers’ report of school climate
Progress toward goals
Student growth and improvement
Rating scale
Ineffective = 1
Developing = 2
Effective = 3
Distinguished = 4
Ineffective = 1
Developing = 2
Effective = 3
Distinguished = 4
Low = 1Low average = 2High average = 3High = 4
Did not meet = 1Partially met = 2Met = 3Exceeded = 4
Did not meet/low = 1
Partially met /low average= 2
Met/high average = 3
Exceeded/high = 4
Sources of Evidence
Observations and related conferences, artifact review, survey results, SLO quality review
Professional development plan review, conversations and documents related to professional goal progress
School climate survey results
Review of progress toward school goals
School-wide student learning measure results, school attainment of SLOs
Calculation
Rate each indicator for Standards 1-8; average all indicator ratings for Standards 1‒8.
Rate each indicator for Standard 9; average all indicator ratings for Standard 9.
Translate survey results into a 4-point scale.
Rate overall progress against School Growth Plan goals.
Rate performance for each measure and average.
Weight 40% 10% 0% 10% 40%
Ineffective: less than 1.5Developing: 1.5–2.4Effective: 2.5–3.4Distinguished: greater than 3.4
![Page 10: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Principal’s reflection
Professional goal-setting
Evidence gathered by the principal and through observations of principal practice
Staff perspectives on principal skills and abilities
Evidence of progress toward school goals and student learning results
Summative rating of performance
Connecting the Dots to Reach a Summative Rating
10
![Page 11: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Learning120 minutes
![Page 12: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
“A teacher being critiqued can view the same feedback either as a threat to her core self or as a challenge for improving her abilities … If teachers don’t sense that their core abilities are under indictment, they are more likely to see the conversation as an opportunity for growth. … In the challenge state, individuals feel invigorated and motivated to meet the challenge.”
Setting the Stage
12
Myung, J. & Martinez, K. (2013). Strategies for Enhancing the Impact of Post-Observation Feedback for Teachers. Stanford, CA: Carnegie Foundation. Retrieved from http://commons.carnegiefoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/BRIEF_Feedback-for-Teachers.pdf
![Page 13: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Targeted, Ongoing Feedback
Improved Educator Practice
Improved Student Achievement
Importance of Quality Feedback
13
![Page 14: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Consider two times you received feedback:1. A time when an evaluator, manager, or colleague approached you in a
way that left a positive impression.2. A time when an evaluator, manager, or colleague did not provide feedback
in a way that was effective for you.
In pairs, share your experiences. Questions to consider:
• When thinking about your own feedback experiences, did you tend to focus on those that were negative? If so, why?
• Thinking about your experiences, how would you define effective feedback? What does it look like? What doesn’t it look like?
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
![Page 15: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Effective feedback is telling the principal not just the evidence statements you collected but also using those statements to move the principal forward.
Characteristics of Effective Feedback
![Page 16: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
FOCUSED: Feedback should focus on what was observed.
EVIDENCE BASED: Feedback should be grounded in evidence of practice.
CONSTRUCTIVE: Feedback should reinforce effective practice and identify areas for continued growth.
TIMELY: Feedback should be provided shortly after the observation.
ACTIONABLE: Feedback should focus on behaviors that can be changed.
Characteristics of Effective Feedback
16
![Page 17: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Consulting
Evaluator Led
Informing, Modeling
Collaborating
Cofacilitated
Sharing, Coplanning
Reflecting
Principal Led
Supportive Thinking
Three Roles for Evaluators in Providing Feedback
![Page 18: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
How the Role Varies by Principal Knowledge and Need
18
Reflecting
Collaborating
Consulting
High Medium Low
Kno
wle
dge
of L
earn
er
Level of Support Needed
![Page 19: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
The evaluator:• Defines the problem for the principal.• Provides the solution and specific advice.
Consulting occurs when:• A principal needs immediate advice.• A principal is still relatively new.• Consulting is needed as a scaffold to move a principal into deeper
conversations.
Evaluator as Consultant
19
![Page 20: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
The evaluator:• Defines the problem with the principal.• Co-constructs solutions to the problem.• Shares responsibility for moving the conversation forward.
Collaborating occurs when:• There is trust between the principal and the evaluator.• The principal and the evaluator share a common goal.
Evaluator as Collaborator
20
![Page 21: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
The evaluator:• Encourages the principal to think about his or her practice.• Paraphrases what the principal says.• Asks the principal questions about identifying problems and finding
solutions to those problems.• Mostly listens.
Reflection occurs over time when:• The principal develops the capacity to think critically about his or her
practice. • The evaluator learns how to ask questions to get the principal to
think deeply.
Evaluator as a Mirror
21
![Page 22: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Quick Self-Assessment• Consider a recent postobservation conference with one of your
principals. What role did you take and why?• Which role do you usually take when providing feedback and why?• What supports and/or resources do you need in order to adopt a
different role?
Turn and Talk• How do different roles meet the requirements for “characteristics of
effective feedback”? Remember, characteristics are focused, evidence based, timely, constructive, and actionable.
Consider Your Style and Approach
22
![Page 23: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Review of Instructional Feedback Observation Rubric
23
4
5
6
1
2
3
Using Evidence and TEPG
Rubric
Professional Environment
Deepening Thinking
Focus on Instruction
Planning for Improvement
Preparing Teachers to
Engage
![Page 24: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Video Background: It shows a postobservation conference between a teacher
(John) and principal. John teaches sixth-grade mathematics. The lesson observed focused on multiplying decimals. John’s goal is focused on using multiple assessment
strategies to evaluate students’ learning.
Video I: Effective Feedback from a Principal to a Teacher
24
![Page 25: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Thinking about the six indicators, what was your overall impression of the feedback the principal provided to the teacher?
Did the principal demonstrate the characteristics of effective feedback?
What were some specific strengths? Areas for improvement?
Based on what you observed in the video, what role (consulting, collaborating, reflecting) do you think you would take when providing feedback to this principal?
Video I: Debrief
![Page 26: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
The Feedback Carousel
Clarifying Questions
Probing Questions
Resources Recommenda-tions
Evaluator’s Role: Consulting—Collaborating—Reflecting
![Page 27: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
How did you feel about providing written feedback for this exercise versus feedback during a conversation?
Which quadrants did you focus on? Why? What role do you plan to take? How does the role affect
which quadrants you focus on? How does the quadrant affect the type of feedback the
principal will receive?
Feedback Carousel Debrief
![Page 28: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Pay attention to body language and tone: both your own and the principal’s.
Listen for major themes of the conversation. Paraphrase using a statement shorter than the original. Begin with “So, you” or “You’re” instead of “I hear you
saying.”
Principles of Paraphrasing
28
![Page 29: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Types of Paraphrasing
29
Acknowledge and Clarify—to Recap in a Different Way
“You’re thinking that …”
“You’re wondering if …”
“You’re concerned about …”
Summarize and Organize—Expresses Theme or Provides Structure
“You’re ready to move on to …”
“You’re in the process of …”
“There are three issues …”
“On the one hand … and on the other hand …”
![Page 30: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Video Background: Seventh-grade mathematics teacher Sixth year of teaching Teacher’s goal: to improve her use of higher-order
questioning Lesson: development of class grading rubrics
Video II: Let’s Practice
30
![Page 31: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
Watch the short video segment and jot down evidence from the conversation.
Focus your evidence gathering on the following LEPG Rubric Indicators:• Indicator 3-d. Pedagogical Knowledge: The leader demonstrates
knowledge of a range of pedagogy and ensures all adults have the knowledge, skills, and dispositions to support student success.
• Indicator 5-b. Relationship Building: The leader builds authentic, productive relationships that foster a collaborative spirit.
Video II: Let’s Practice
![Page 32: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Deepening Thinking Asks questions that scaffold the
conversation, assist reflection on evidence and the TEPG rubric, prompt an explanation of thinking, and support connecting feedback to student learning and development.
Instructional Feedback Observation Indicators
32
Preparing Teachers to Engage Asks teacher to reflect on
the evidence collected and to consider how it supports or contradicts the teacher’s self-ratings on the TEPG rubric.
4
5
6
1
2
3
Using Evidence and TEPG
Rubric
Professional Environment
Deepening Thinking
Focus on Instruction
Planning for Improvement
Preparing Teachers to
Engage
3 5
![Page 33: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
Video II: Feedback Carousel
Clarifying Questions
Probing Questions
Resources Recommenda-tions
Evaluator’s Role: Consulting—Collaborating—Reflecting
![Page 34: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
How would you describe or rate the principal’s performance during the observation in the LEPG Rubric Indicators of focus?
What is the specific feedback you chose to share with the principal? Why?
Looking at the Feedback Carousel, in what quadrant(s) does your feedback fall?
Is your feedback focused, evidence based, constructive, timely, and actionable?
What coaching approach seems the most appropriate for this principal? Why?
Video II: Debrief
![Page 35: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Implementing60 minutes
35
![Page 36: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
Option 1: Survey items based on the LEPG Standard Indicator language
Option 2: Survey items based on LEPG Standard Indicator rubric language
Option 3: Revised National Board survey items Option 3b: Abbreviated version of the revised National
Board items
360-Degree Survey Options
![Page 37: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Number of Survey Items
Standards Addressed
Items Per Standard
Option 1 22 items Std 1−8 2−4
Option 2 22 items Std 1−8 2−4
Option 3 57 items Std 1−8 2−9
Option 3b 41 items Std 1−8 1−9
Summary of Each Option
37
Suggested Scale
Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly
AgreeI Don’t Know/ Unable to Judge
Never Sometimes Often Always I Don’t Know/ Unable to Judge
![Page 38: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38
Select a 360-degree survey. Decide who will take the survey
(e.g., all staff, all teachers, a sample of staff).
Determine how survey results will be incorporated into principal evaluations(e.g., as narrative evidence, averaged into relevant Standard ratings).
Determine the survey administration method(e.g., paper and pencil, Survey Monkey, other online method).
Identify a survey administration time and venue(e.g., administration window of one week with link sent via e-mail, one-time administration at a staff meeting).
Planning for Survey Implementation
![Page 39: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
Follow-up15 minutes
![Page 40: The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062812/568163a7550346895dd4b355/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40
As you think about the process of principal observation and constructing and delivering effective feedback, consider the following: What are you most comfortable with? What are your outstanding questions? What do you see as the benefits of providing this type of
feedback to principals? What will be the greatest challenges?
Reflecting