the limits of university teaching

46
Testing the limits of university teaching MOOCs, Multimedia and Distributed Collaboration George Roberts 26/06/2012

Upload: george-roberts

Post on 01-Nov-2014

1.644 views

Category:

Education


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Among the practices which have emerged through the New Lecturers Programme in 2011-12, there are three that test the limits to online learning:massive open on-line courses (moocs),virtual conferences as a means of assessment, anddistributed collaboration as a means of working in learning sets.Taken together, these practices allow us to examine the role of the university and to re-imagine a place for institutions in a world where openness, access and community have come to underpin academic knowledge.http://www.brookes.ac.uk/services/ocsld/resources/learn_teach_conf/2012/abstracts/roberts.html

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The limits of university teaching

Testing the limits of university teaching

MOOCs, Multimedia and Distributed Collaboration

George Roberts26/06/2012

Page 2: The limits of university teaching

Limits of navigation

• MOOCs• Multimedia for assessment• Distributed collaboration

Page 3: The limits of university teaching

Audiographic Simulcast• Blackboard Collaborate in use

Page 4: The limits of university teaching
Page 5: The limits of university teaching
Page 6: The limits of university teaching

• It is not that we ignore web-based and internet technologies at our peril… In truth, we ignore the traditional university at our peril. (M Roberts 2012)

Matters affecting UVa

Page 7: The limits of university teaching

Superposition of randomness

• superposition of randomness leading to a transforming experience

Page 8: The limits of university teaching

Related randomness?

• Identity• Community• Literacy

• Three topics:– MOOCs– Academic Multimedia– Distributed Collaboration

Page 9: The limits of university teaching

Old MOOCs, new MOOCs, red MOOCs blue MOOCs

MOOCsMassive Open Online Courses

Page 10: The limits of university teaching

Old MOOCs from 2008

• Explicit pedagogical perspective– Social constructivist, dialogic, actor networks

• Distributed, open source platform components– Wikis, WordPress, Moodle

• Intentional social media conversations– Twitter, Facebook, Blogs

• Open challenge to institutions– Access, environment, IPR, assessment

Page 11: The limits of university teaching
Page 12: The limits of university teaching

New MOOCs from 2011

• Tacit pedagogical perspective– Instructivist, pragmatic, realist, – Authentic: employment oriented

• Consolidated platforms– Incidental social media

• Institutional counter-position– Elite, neo-colonial (?)

Page 13: The limits of university teaching
Page 14: The limits of university teaching

Our MOOC• First Steps into Learning and Teaching in Higher

Education (FSLT12)

Page 15: The limits of university teaching

MOOC Problematics

• Old MOOC– Navigation, chaos, disorientation, exposure,

tuition

• New MOOC– Packaging, automation, two-tier

• All MOOCs– Motivation

Page 16: The limits of university teaching

MOOC benefits

• Old MOOC– Autonomy

• New MOOC– Authority

• All MOOC– Access, authenticity

Page 17: The limits of university teaching

MOOC Limits

• Identity– Embodiment– Preference: introversion extroversion

• Community– Serendipity

• Literacy– Genre, paralinguistics

Page 18: The limits of university teaching

Post-Text Problematics: Social Citation and Valorisation of Knowledge

Multimedia for Assessment

Page 19: The limits of university teaching

Presentations to virtual conferences

• Diverse practice– Audio enhanced

• Some excellent– But, some 2000

word essays on 12 ppt slides

• Markers unfamiliar with the genre– What is

scholarship in this medium?

Page 20: The limits of university teaching

Other Multimedia Assessment Examples

• Video essays– Sustained inquiry

• Multimedia learning journals– Reflective collection

• Audio feedback

Page 21: The limits of university teaching

Valorisation of knowledge

Page 22: The limits of university teaching
Page 23: The limits of university teaching

Multimedia scholarship

In 2003, Stephen Downes wrote

• multimedia computing … provides scholarly discourse with great opportunities, but also problematizes that discourse (Ingraham, 2000)

• large bodies of continuous text … are likely to remain the primary medium for the dissemination of scholarship (Ingraham & Bradburn, 2003)

• the 'electronic book' is likely to become the primary medium … for the dissemination of text-mediated scholarly discourse (Ingraham & Bradburn, 2003a), [and] disseminating educational multimedia.

But, let’s have a look at Downes 2003

Page 24: The limits of university teaching

Multimedia assessment limits

• Community– Traditions of the disciplines

• Identity– Our scholarly selves

• Literacy– The Genre is new– The links degrade, coping with transience

Page 25: The limits of university teaching

Being together in the bodyDistributed-collaborative learning sets

Page 26: The limits of university teaching

Distributed Learning Sets

• Explicit Intended Outcome– As a group produce a seminar addressing a

current issue in higher education learning and teaching

• Tacit Intended Outcome– Discover ways to work as a group, which allow for

distributed collaboration: across the three Brookes campuses and several other universities

Page 27: The limits of university teaching
Page 28: The limits of university teaching

Distribution in two ways

In small groups to collaborate in production of the seminars

– Forums, email, Google Docs, wiki

In Plenary to attend/review sessions– Matterhorn Lecture Capture + Podcast

Producer

Page 29: The limits of university teaching

Distribution issuesSmall groups

– Defaulted to Face to face• Disadvantage the minority

Plenary– Groups focused on own performances– Low attention/attendance to other groups

seminars• Substantial curriculum input missed

Page 30: The limits of university teaching

A controlled classroom environment isn’t a bad thing.

(Krauss 2012)

Page 31: The limits of university teaching

Distributed Collaboration Limits

• Identity– We know ourselves in the reflection of others

• Community– Cohesion through diversity

• Literacy– Paralinguistics

Page 32: The limits of university teaching

Discussion

• Turn to the person beside you – or to the chat stream in Collaborate

• In light of: MOOCs, Multimedia and Distributed Collaboration

• Where are your limits of navigation?

Page 33: The limits of university teaching

Disruptive?Technology

Page 34: The limits of university teaching
Page 35: The limits of university teaching

QUESTION: If SOPA/PIPA [or the Digital Economy Act in the UK] had been passed into U.S. law in 2002, would Wikipedia exist today? If either law had passed in 2012, would Wikipedia exist in 2022? Why or why not? Discuss.

Page 36: The limits of university teaching

If you cannot answer that question, you are not literate nor are you in control of your

life—even if you think you are.

Page 37: The limits of university teaching

Watersheds?

• Narrative ? > 50,000 years• Writing c. 5,000 years• Printing c. 500 years• Perspective c. 500 years• Steam c. 250 years• Mass literacy c. 150 years• Cinema c. 100 years• Internet c. 35 years

Page 38: The limits of university teaching

Christ Handing the Keys to St. Peter, Perugino, 1481

Page 39: The limits of university teaching
Page 40: The limits of university teaching

Discourses around higher education are:

“… a field of competition for the legitimate exercise of symbolic

violence,

… an arena of conflict between rival principles of legitimacy, and

competition for political, economic and cultural power

(Bourdieu 1993, 121)

Page 41: The limits of university teaching
Page 42: The limits of university teaching

Literacy - including digital - is the practice of enunciation in a

community:

“speaking” in the broadest sense, projecting an identity

with, through and to others who concur

Page 43: The limits of university teaching

digital literacy cannot be separated from other

educational - or social, or economic, or political -

developments.

Page 44: The limits of university teaching

Digital literacy is far more than skills with keyboard & apps.

It is how we & our students negotiate the

ICT-mediated frontier between rival principles.

Page 45: The limits of university teaching

Limits of navigation

• MOOCs– Radical openness is not for

everyone

• Multimedia for assessment– Text citation and commentary asserts itself through

every fissure

• Distributed collaboration– We crave – and are good at – contact

Page 46: The limits of university teaching

Thank you

Dr George RobertsOCSLD, Oxford Brookes University

June [email protected]