the marketplace at lincoln & scottsdale...the marketplace at lincoln & scottsdale...

The Marketplace at Lincoln & ScottsdaleThe Marketplace at Lincoln & ScottsdaleScottsdale, Arizona

LeDonna [email protected]

15044 N Scottsdale RdSuite 240Scottsdale, AZ 85254

w w w . c o r r i t o r e . c o m

Located on the Northwest Corner of Scottsdale Road

& Lincoln Drive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

http://www.corritore.com

http://www.corritore.com

mailto:[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

Ashley

Line

Ashley

Line

S C O T T S D A L E & L I N C O L N M I X E D U S E

DRB Project Narrative Residential Portion of Mixed Use Development

North & West of the NWC Scottsdale Road and Lincoln Drive

INTRODUCTION The Scottsdale & Lincoln Mixed Use property is approximately 8 acres and is located north and west of the northwest corner of Scottsdale Road and Lincoln Drive (the “Property”). In the early 1970’s, the Property was zoned for commercial use and was developed with multiple commercial office buildings that operated successfully on the site for many years. Since then, the Property has been abandoned and is in a state of disrepair. The aged office buildings are now vacant and deteriorating. The purpose of this application is for Development Review Board approval for the residential portion (5.31 acres) of the mixed use development. The current property zoning (PUD) and Development Plan was approved on January 24, 2012. The Property is designated as Mixed‐Use Neighborhoods on the General Plan. LOCATION / CURRENT USE

The Scottsdale Road & Lincoln Drive Mixed Use PUD is located at the NWC of Scottsdale Rd and Lincoln Dr. The development excludes the 48,000 square foot lot at the hard corner (Maricopa County APN 174‐57‐004B), which currently contains two separate commercial office buildings (C‐O zoning). The property consists of Maricopa County APNs 174‐57‐002E, 174‐57‐002G, and 174‐57‐004F. RELATIONSHIP TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES

The northern property boundary is shared with the Scottsdale Spectrum (C‐O (C)/P‐4 zoning), a Class‐A office property consisting of approximately 250,000 square feet of office space. The western property boundary is shared with the site of the future Ritz‐Carlton master plan located within the Town of Paradise Valley (zoned SUP); the western boundary also serves as the delineation between the City of Scottsdale and the Town of Paradise Valley. The southern property border is Lincoln Drive; the property directly south of Lincoln Drive includes the Lincoln Village Shopping Center (C‐2 zoning). The eastern property border is Scottsdale Rd and the property directly east of Scottsdale Rd includes bank and office buildings (C‐O (C) zoning).

DEVELOPMENT PLAN The proposed development will be a combination of a high‐end residential rental community and complementary retail shop buildings. The property will provide a necessary redevelopment at an underutilized, unique, and desirable location in the heart of Scottsdale. The residential portion of the redevelopment will be built as a sustainable community and is planned to achieve a LEED Gold certification. It will include approximately 264 market rental residential units ranging in size from 630 to

1

1,100 square feet. The residential building will feature gated access, a fully submerged (subterranean) parking garage, elevator access to units, interior air‐conditioned building corridors, detached enclosed private parking garages, a fully appointed fitness center and lifestyle amenity spaces, and a boutique hotel‐style pool and amenity area. The residential buildings along Lincoln Drive will provide an attractive streetscape including a step‐up design that will provide architectural diversity for such an important corner (Scottsdale Road and Lincoln Drive) within the City of Scottsdale. Furthermore, the residential buildings will vary in height and east/west orientations to further establish an attractive elevation. The northern property line will include reduced building heights to provide a height buffer to the neighboring office building to the north. COMMON AREA SPACES The Development Plan has placed an emphasis on the availability of Open Space by providing approximately 94,000sf of open space, which equals 57,223 sf or 155% more than the required open space. This open space is inclusive of social gathering areas such as pool and spa gathering areas, casitas, ramadas, outdoor kitchen and dining areas, and outdoor exercise areas. The attractive location for the residential community is intended to attract a social resident; one who frequents the area retail services, restaurants and surrounding development, but also one who enjoys the social interaction inherent to an urban residential community. SIGNAGE A Comprehensive Sign Package will be submitted under separate permit and review; the signage is intended to address both the Scottsdale Rd frontage with a combined presentation for the residential and retail components of the mixed use, as well as a separate sign along Lincoln Dr at the main entry to the residential portion of the mixed use. The current site plan and building elevations denote the intended sign locations. PARKING In addition to a small surface parking lot, the residential portion of the development will incorporate one level of underground parking. This will allow the site to be developed with emphasis on the pedestrian. Additionally, the carriage buildings located along the northern Property line will house main level private garages. VEHICULAR ACCESS AND CIRCULATION Driveway Locations: The combined uses will share an existing access drive along Scottsdale Road allowing for pedestrian and vehicular connectivity. Additionally, the residential portion will include primary and secondary access points along Lincoln Drive. Currently, two access points are provided along Lincoln Drive. The development will use the existing western access while relocating the eastern access approximately one hundred (100) feet west to align with the driveway across Lincoln Drive. Internal Circulation: The development will modify and upgrade the existing westernmost drive, allowing for continued access to the Scottsdale Spectrum office development. The residential portion of the

2

development can be accessed from said drive via a controlled gate at the north end of the Property. The main access to the residential development is off of Lincoln Drive. Upon entering a courtyard, access can be gained to the underground parking structure. Vehicular access will also be provided from the retail portion of the Property via a controlled gate.

DESIGN PRINCIPLES & CHARACTER STATEMENTS 1. The design character of any area should be enhanced and strengthened by new development.

The building design creates a uniquely situated courtyard environment, orienting the units towards this shared amenity. The project promotes a pedestrian experience through the use of shaded walkways and bicycle parking in proximity to a vibrant resort core. The proposed development provides housing in a mature area of the City where existing open space and recreational facilities can be taken advantage of and provides additional per capita spending to support the tax base used to pay for the development and maintenance of recreational facilities and services. The building design is sensitive to the evolving context of the area over time by incorporating colors and textures that relate to the existing buildings in the neighborhood.

2. Development, through appropriate siting and orientation of buildings, should recognize and preserve

established major vistas, as well as protect natural features.

The project is oriented to preserve and maximize the views of the internal courtyard as well as Camelback Mountain to the west, Papago Mountain to the southwest and the McDowell Mountains to the northeast. Each unit is designed to maximize the great range of views that are available at the property.

3. Development should be sensitive to existing topography and landscaping.

The residential development incorporates landscaping elements that blend with the diverse mix of the neighborhood as well as those landscape elements that are present along the Scottsdale corridor. Trees around the pool complement those on the corridor to the east. In addition, many residential, retail and commercial properties in the area feature these same trees. The west entry drive is lined with evergreen planting that complement the many evergreens in this mature neighborhood. The entry drive is lined with trees that are consistent with the many species in this mature neighborhood (particularly those that line the property directly to the west and are present on the office project to the north).

4. Development should protect the character of the Sonoran desert by preserving and restoring natural

habitats and ecological processes.

The residential development will restore character of the area by improving the currently vacant and deteriorated site. Years of neglect have caused water to pond and drainage areas have become clogged from lack of maintenance. The project will improve flows of neighborhood rain water to improve historic flooding conditions in this area as well as provide flooding relief to surrounding properties along Lincoln Dr.

5. The design of the public realm, including streetscapes, parks, plazas and civic amenities, is an

opportunity to provide identity to the community and to convey its design expectations.

3

Ashley

Rectangle

Ashley

Text Box

i

The streetscapes provide continuity among the adjacent uses through the use of cohesive landscaping, decorative paving and street furniture. The landscaping of the entry drive is coordinated to provide continuity with the tree lined drive to the west. Decorative paving is being installed to visually break up the drive aisles and add to the pedestrian experience. Benches are being installed along the entry drive to provide a place for residents and visitors to sit and enjoy the landscape while under the shade canopy of the trees.

6. Developments should integrate alternative modes of transportation, including bicycles and bus

access, within the pedestrian network that encourage social contact and interaction within the community.

The development encourages social interaction within the community by providing multiple gathering places for residents and visitors. The interior community area has several seating areas with television, fitness and gaming areas. This space opens up to the outdoor space, which contains a pool, exercise area, barbeques, fire pit and several seating areas. In addition, there will be bicycle racks located on the property to encourage their use. There is a bus stop located along Scottsdale Road south of the entrance driveway to the community to promote the use of public transportation. Moreover, there are benches along the entry drive the provide space for gathering or pausing on the property. By placing a significant percentage of the property parking below grade, walking distances are shorter and more convenient for residents and visitors.

7. Development should show consideration for the pedestrian by providing landscaping and shading

elements as well as inviting access connections to adjacent developments.

The development incorporates design elements that reflect the human scale by providing a shaded walking path along the project interior. In addition, benches are incorporated along the way to create an opportunity for the pedestrian to pause, enjoy the shade or gather with guests or other residents. The balance of the project incorporates community gathering areas that are clustered in areas of shade under trees, trellises, cabanas and ramadas located adjacent to the pool and lounge. Access to the adjacent retail to the east is highlighted with specialty paving, gates and landscape areas. Retail to the south is accessed at the intersection cross walk. Pedestrian traffic to the north office development is gate‐controlled at the request of the office property owner.

8. Buildings should be designed with a logical hierarchy of masses.

The visual impact of the building’s height and size are controlled by stepping the heights of the buildings toward the center of the site. The buildings on the north and south side are reduced heights in comparison to the interior buildings for visual impact and to reduce the perceived massing of the project. The entry of the project is highlighted by a three‐story tall entry “bridge” to help visually identify the building entry and signify a logical order to the buildings. In addition, the project is broken up into separate building masses, to lessen visual impact as well as to allow better pedestrian and air flow circulation. The below grade parking reduces the conflict for direct pedestrian access.

9. The design of the built environment should respond to the desert environment.

4

Interior spaces of all of the living rooms extend to the outside on every unit. Half of the units open directly to the open courtyard and the vistas beyond allowing the residents to embrace the desert environment. Remaining units open up to perimeter mountain views, to allow resident to enjoy the desert environment. Enhanced commercial acrylic stucco with warm earth tones was chosen to reflect the mountains and desert that surround the area. Shade structures and underground garage spaces provide shade for cars, but also to reduce the heat‐island effect usually associated with paved surfaces. Shade devices are provided adjacent to the pool area to provide shade and create a sense of year‐ round openness. Most of the balconies and windows are provided in deep recessed areas or solar shade devices to protect from the effects of the sun.

10. Developments should strive to incorporate sustainable and healthy building practices and products.

The developer has established a reputation for incorporating sustainability into their urban projects and will continue to do so with the residential development. The project is currently designed to achieve a LEED Gold certification. The project has many sustainable elements including double‐pane Low‐E glass, low water‐use irrigation system, deep recessed window and balcony areas, low water‐flow fixtures, Energy Star appliances, and an efficient building envelope. These building techniques will reduce the impact on the environment, reduce water consumption and as well as reduce energy use. The project will include electric vehicle (EV) charging stations to encourage the use of alternative transportation methods. The building is designed to meet the Scottsdale Green Building program requirements and energy modeling will be performed to optimize the design of heating and cooling systems.

11. Landscape design should respond to the desert environment by utilizing a variety of mature

landscape materials indigenous to the arid region.

The character of the area is emphasized by the careful selection of planting materials in terms of scale, density and arrangement. Influences for the selection of planting materials were identified within the surrounding community. Trees that are present on the property to the north and west are incorporated into the landscape creating continuity in the neighborhood. Trees were selected to surround the pool area as they are similarly located along the streets of the surrounding neighborhood. Ground covers and shrubs were selected for their texture, low‐water use, and to shade the ground around the buildings. The scale and arrangement of the plantings is designed to complement the built forms and provide shade and visual impact for the community.

12. Site design should incorporate techniques for efficient water use by providing desert adapted

landscaping and preserving native plants.

The site design incorporates lower‐water use drip irrigation for nearly all of the landscape materials. Plants that are adapted to the arid environment are used throughout the site. There are no native plants on the site; however, care was taken to select plants for their low water‐use and drought tolerance. Water as a landscape element is used judiciously. There is a community pool located on site, in the center courtyard as the main water element. The splash and bubble of the associated features will provide cooling, as well as background noise. The pool is located at the center of the complex and at the core of pedestrian activity.

5

CHARACTER STATEMENTS Environmental Response: The development is planned to be and remain a sustainable development within the community. Being energy efficient and environmentally responsive creates a better home atmosphere for residents as well as for retail services and commerce. Public knowledge has grown exponentially in recent years and being proactive in providing sustainable living and shopping experiences is essential. Higher density housing with multiple stories minimizes exterior exposure in the desert environment through reduced roof and wall exposure. Each unit maintains a limited private open space inside the building to maximize community open space. The wide and shallow unit orientation provides ample light and ventilation, but further reduces energy requirements for air conditioning. The below‐grade parking garage, while providing an attractive streetscape and livable community, also requires less surface parking. This reduction of on‐grade asphalt helps minimize radiant energy (i.e., heat island effect). The combined residential and retail components will help reduce the necessity for vehicular travel; additionally, the overall property location and proximity serves to reduce travel times to area employment and other retail service locations. The residential component of the development plan anticipates achieving a green designation; each unit will also incorporate environmentally sensitive “elements” to increase energy efficiency including but not limited to high efficiency mechanical equipment and water heaters, dual glaze low‐e windows, reduced flow toilets and energy rated appliances. Additionally, on‐site separate and proactive recycling measures will be implemented throughout the property operations as well as during the demolition and construction processes. The proposed design provides for a wide range of on‐site amenities allowing residents to enjoy a complete lifestyle at their home.

Architectural Character: The proposed residential and retail buildings are intended to be consistent with the adjoining future resort and current office neighbors as well as the area commercial uses to the east and south of the development.

The entire development will draw from the most successful surrounding commercial elements; for example, the building materials and colors are derived from adjacent buildings. The exterior stone cladding is smaller in scale and desert‐toned, which is consistent with the Hilton Hotel accents. The smooth‐textured stucco system relates to both the surrounding residential and commercial developments. The proposed metal accents borrow from the success of the Spectrum office development and Hilton Hotel elements.

The creation of an environment that draws future residents, guests and retail shoppers to visit and enjoy property amenities is integral in developing a successful mixed‐use property. The proposed architecture for the residential component reduces the overall massing and height of the entry and street‐side buildings, which helps emphasize the common area as a distinctive and easily recognizable element providing maximum impact.

Site Development Character: The residential boulevard entry utilizes an existing 50‐ft. driveway along Lincoln Drive for residents and guests to access the development. Additionally, an existing 24‐ft. (right‐in/right‐out) driveway is being widened to serve as the secondary access drive for fire department, service and / or moving trucks. This component helps to setback all of the building structures from the western property line and the highly landscaped drive also provides a secondary access and exit for the Spectrum office property to the north.

6

The site “edge treatments” of the proposed development vary considerably due to the existing nature and content of adjacent parcels, and are treated differently and are described as follows: Lincoln Drive is the southern perimeter of the site (“southern edge”) and is considered as the residential component’s “public edge” as it is the first multi‐family residential development in the area, which reinforces the unique image of the project. The proposed locations of the buildings are designed to avoid impacting the existing streetscape. As a result of careful planning efforts, the development meets the minimum 34‐ft. and average 40‐ft. PUD building setback standard along Lincoln Drive.

The “western edge” responds to the proposed Ritz Carlton Resort (located within the Town of Paradise Valley). The drive and sidewalk along the western edge buffers the residential development from the adjacent commercial mixed use resort project. Additional attention has been given to the meandering drive and setting it off with a strong landscape border and visual impact from the west. This drive is accented with a series of paver “rumble strips” that act as traffic calming measures as well as intermittent design elements.

The “northern edge” is impacted by a 15‐ft. setback with mature landscaping, which currently buffers the Spectrum Office Complex. There are five planned “carriage” units along the setback that will provide privacy and height screening, as well as an intermediate step‐up to the increased height residential buildings. Landscape Character: In keeping with the environmental, architectural and design characters already discussed, the proposed landscape character will feature a combined use of softscape (plant) and hardscape materials to create an overall pedestrian‐level experience. The plant palette will incorporate indigenous and low water use plant material. Trees and shrubs have been carefully selected and designed to compliment the architecture, blend with the surrounding environment and relate to the adjacent uses. Many attributes of the project will contribute to water conservation. An efficient irrigation system will be utilized with evapotranspiration calculation technology to automatically adjust the irrigation for regional weather characteristics. Artificial turf will be utilized to further the water conservation efforts. Water efficient features have been located in carefully selected areas as focal points where high vehicular and pedestrian activity occurs. The use of mature canopied trees, as well as overhead hardscape elements will provide shading and encourage pedestrian connectivity within the mixed use development as well as to adjacent properties.

DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD CRITERIA (Ordinance Sec 1.904) A. The Board shall examine the application to insure that all provisions of this ordinance and all other

ordinances, master plans, General Plans and standards of the City of Scottsdale shall be complied with where applicable. The General Plan Land Use Element and the Southern Scottsdale Character Area Plan designate the property as Mixed‐Use Neighborhoods, which is consistent with the current Development Plan.

B. The proposed development shall not have any detrimental effect upon the general health, welfare, safety and convenience of persons residing or working in the neighborhood; or shall not be detrimental or injurious to the neighborhood.

7

The residential development will be a Class‐A high‐end quality development that will attract a residential profile consistent with the surrounding neighbors. The property will consist of a 24‐hour management oversight including security and privacy measures.

C. The proposed development shall promote a desirable relationship of structures to one another, to

open spaces and topography both on the site and in the surrounding neighborhood.

Refer to Design Principles #2 ‐ #4 for conformance and discussion of building location and orientation. Please also note the Site Development Character statement detailing the relationship of the buildings, open spaces and site “edge treatments” regarding neighboring developments.

D. The height, area, setbacks and overall mass, as well as parts of any structure (buildings, walls, signs, lighting, etc.) and landscaping shall be appropriate to the development, the neighborhood and the community.

Refer to Design Principles #2 ‐ #4 for conformance and discussion of building location and orientation. Please also note the Site Development Character statement detailing the relationship of the buildings, open spaces and site “edge treatments” regarding neighboring developments. The Landscape Character statement further confirms the selection of soft and hardscape materials intended to blend with the surrounding environment and relate to the adjacent uses.

E. Ingress, egress, internal traffic circulation, off‐street parking facilities, loading and service areas and pedestrian ways shall be so designed as to promote safety and convenience.

The property provides traffic relief to the prior approved use and site plan. The vehicular and pedestrian connectivity plans have been designed in accordance with recommendations from City of Scottsdale Traffic staff and from the third‐party traffic engineer TIMA process.

F. The architectural character of the proposed structure shall be in harmony with, and compatible to, those structures in the neighboring environment, and the architectural character adopted for any given area, avoiding excessive variety or monotonous repetition.

Refer to Design Principles #2 ‐ #4 & #9 ‐ #12 for conformance and emphasis of the design sensitivity to the existing environment and climate. Please also note the Architectural Character statement detailing additional measures to respond to the surrounding environment.

G. All mechanical equipment, appurtenances and utilities, and their associated screening shall be integral to the building design.

Refer to Building Elevations to confirm screening of all mechanical equipment behind the designed roof elements, ensuring that the rooftop items are not in view of surrounding neighbors.

H. The architectural character of a development shall take cognizance of the unique climatological and other environmental factors of this region and promote indigenous architectural feeling.

Refer to Design Principles #2 ‐ #4 and #9 ‐ #12 for conformance and emphasis of the design sensitivity to the existing environment and climate. Please also note the Architectural & Landscape Character statements detailing additional measures to respond to the surrounding environment.

8

I. Within the environmentally sensitive land (ESL) district, the site planning, landscaping, and all

buildings and structures, except single family detached homes, shall be designed and reviewed in accordance with recommendations and guidelines in the environmentally sensitive lands ordinance, Section 6.1010.

N/A, the property is not within the ESL district.

J. Within the H‐P district, special cognizance shall be taken of any unique or characteristic architectural features, including, but not limited to, building height, size, shape, color, texture, setback or architectural detail

N/A, the property is not within the Historic preservation district.

K. Within the downtown district, building designs shall reflect the urban character and pedestrian orientation of the area.

N/A, the property is not within the downtown district; however refer to Design Principle items #5 ‐ #7 for conformance to urban and pedestrian design.

L. Within the downtown district, building designs shall reflect traditional or southwestern design vernaculars, break the overall massing into smaller elements, express small scale detailing and recess fenestrations.

N/A, the property is not within the downtown district; however, the property is designed with a logical hierarchy of masses that reduces building massing and provides appropriate architectural detailing and building recess elements.

M. Within the downtown district, the Board shall review projects for conformance with specific design guidelines embodied in administrative regulations, as authorized by the Zoning Administrator. N/A, the property is not within the downtown district.

CONCLUSION The residential development of the overall mixed use will establish complementary and desired uses at a unique urban location and neighborhood within the City of Scottsdale. The property is being developed to reflect the high quality nature of the surrounding properties as well as the location/area. The combined development team has a successful track record of developing high‐end residential and urban developments locally in metro Phoenix as well as other urban locations throughout the US including (i) Hollywood, CA (ii) Los Angeles, CA, (iii) Portland, OR, (iv) Denver, CO, (v) Dallas, TX, and (vi) Atlanta, GA. The development team is committed to delivering a sustainable development that will enhance the character and success of the surrounding area and of the City of Scottsdale.

9

Pop-Facts: Demographic Snapshot 2012 Report

Radius 1: E LINCOLN DR AT N SCOTTSDALE RD, SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85253, aggregate



Radius 3Radius 2

0.00 - 5.00 miles0.00 - 3.00 miles0.00 - 1.00 miles

% % %Radius 1Description

Population

155,13854,8995,334 2017 Projection

155,42754,8035,255 2012 Estimate

165,05558,0055,367 2000 Census

147,71752,6304,824 1990 Census

-0.19%0.18%1.50% Growth 2012-2017

-5.83%-5.52%-2.09% Growth 2000-2012

11.74%10.21%11.26% Growth 1990-2000

2012 Est. Pop by Single Race Class 54,803 155,4275,255

135,463 87.1690.5149,6024,891 White Alone 93.07

3,126 2.011.4981863 Black or African American Alone 1.20

2,707 1.740.8948620 Amer. Indian and Alaska Native Alone 0.38

3,920 2.522.541,390132 Asian Alone 2.51

178 0.110.11602 Native Hawaiian and Other Pac. Isl. Alone 0.04

6,059 3.902.151,18149 Some Other Race Alone 0.93

3,973 2.562.311,26898 Two or More Races 1.86

2012 Est. Pop Hisp or Latino by Origin 54,803 155,4275,255

136,674 87.9392.4650,6695,008 Not Hispanic or Latino 95.30

18,753 12.077.544,134247 Hispanic or Latino: 4.70

15,492 82.6172.933,015191 Mexican 77.33

460 2.453.051262 Puerto Rican 0.81

186 0.991.385712 Cuban 4.86

2,616 13.9522.6793742 All Other Hispanic or Latino 17.00

2012 Est. Hisp or Latino by Single Race Class 4,134 18,753247

10,887 58.0562.222,572178 White Alone 72.06

182 0.970.68280 Black or African American Alone 0.00

422 2.251.31541 American Indian and Alaska Native Alone 0.40

67 0.360.56234 Asian Alone 1.62

19 0.100.2290 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander Alone 0.00

5,864 31.2727.121,12146 Some Other Race Alone 18.62

1,312 7.007.9132717 Two or More Races 6.88

Nielsen Solution Center 1 800 866 6511

Prepared By:

Prepared For:

Project Code: lincoln and scottsdale

131 OfPage

© 2012 The Nielsen Company. All rights reserved.

Mon Jun 04, 2012Prepared On:

www.claritas.com

www.sitereports.com





Radius 3Radius 2



2012 Est. Pop. Asian Alone Race by Cat 1,390 3,920132

1,073 27.3724.5334136 Chinese, except Taiwanese 27.27

534 13.6216.4722923 Filipino 17.42

170 4.345.54770 Japanese 0.00

857 21.8621.012928 Asian Indian 6.06

387 9.8713.3818662 Korean 46.97

432 11.026.33882 Vietnamese 1.52

32 0.821.73240 Cambodian 0.00

1 0.030.0000 Hmong 0.00

45 1.150.6590 Laotian 0.00

77 1.962.66370 Thai 0.00

311 7.937.631061 All Other Asian Races Including 2+ Category 0.76

2012 Est. Population by Ancestry 54,803 155,4275,255

1,350 0.870.8647242 Pop, Arab 0.80

865 0.560.6233934 Pop, Czech 0.65

666 0.430.5932418 Pop, Danish 0.34

1,762 1.131.34737129 Pop, Dutch 2.45

14,324 9.2210.065,511626 Pop, English 11.91

3,677 2.372.461,349139 Pop, French (except Basque) 2.65

826 0.530.5128115 Pop, French Canadian 0.29

20,579 13.2413.497,394879 Pop, German 16.73

1,139 0.731.1361875 Pop, Greek 1.43

652 0.420.4524926 Pop, Hungarian 0.49

15,542 10.0010.815,923659 Pop, Irish 12.54

7,656 4.935.162,826212 Pop, Italian 4.03

341 0.220.2312522 Pop, Lithuanian 0.42

7,635 4.915.402,958254 Pop, United States or American 4.83

3,061 1.972.041,11773 Pop, Norwegian 1.39

4,231 2.723.031,658127 Pop, Polish 2.42

358 0.230.201116 Pop, Portuguese 0.11

3,155 2.032.251,23179 Pop, Russian 1.50

2,585 1.661.44790100 Pop, Scottish 1.90

1,953 1.261.2568380 Pop, Scotch-Irish 1.52

319 0.210.189815 Pop, Slovak 0.29

219 0.140.07390 Pop, Subsaharan African 0.00

2,508 1.611.891,03790 Pop, Swedish 1.71

500 0.320.3418816 Pop, Swiss 0.30

445 0.290.341858 Pop, Ukrainian 0.15

581 0.370.4524731 Pop, Welsh 0.59

152 0.100.09472 Pop, West Indian (exc Hisp groups) 0.04

44,437 28.5924.1713,244957 Pop, Other ancestries 18.21


Prepared By:

Prepared For:


132 OfPage



www.claritas.com

www.sitereports.com





Radius 3Radius 2



2012 Est. Population by Ancestry

13,910 8.959.165,022540 Pop, Ancestry Unclassified 10.28

2012 Est. Pop Age 5+ by Language Spoken At Home 52,501 147,6675,092

124,299 84.1887.7246,0534,642 Speak Only English at Home 91.16

1,403 0.950.8846442 Speak Asian/Pac. Isl. Lang. at Home 0.82

5,292 3.583.942,066245 Speak IndoEuropean Language at Home 4.81

15,230 10.317.123,736151 Speak Spanish at Home 2.97

1,442 0.980.3518213 Speak Other Language at Home 0.26

2012 Est. Population by Sex 54,803 155,4275,255

76,393 49.1548.3626,5012,447 Male 46.57

79,034 50.8551.6428,3032,807 Female 53.42

2012 Est. Population by Age 54,803 155,4275,255

7,760 4.994.202,303163 Age 0 - 4 3.10

8,644 5.564.732,592182 Age 5 - 9 3.46

7,992 5.144.432,427176 Age 10 - 14 3.35

4,922 3.172.841,558123 Age 15 - 17 2.34

4,392 2.832.541,39394 Age 18 - 20 1.79

6,285 4.043.571,956152 Age 21 - 24 2.89

23,128 14.8813.487,388466 Age 25 - 34 8.87

22,041 14.1813.457,373746 Age 35 - 44 14.20

23,304 14.9914.337,851708 Age 45 - 54 13.47

21,187 13.6315.298,3771,121 Age 55 - 64 21.33

11,820 7.609.685,304669 Age 65 - 74 12.73

9,497 6.118.144,459477 Age 75 - 84 9.08

4,456 2.873.321,821178 Age 85 and over 3.39

129,329 83.2185.6846,9534,689 Age 16 and over 89.23

126,109 81.1483.8045,9244,611 Age 18 and over 87.75

121,717 78.3181.2644,5314,517 Age 21 and over 85.96

25,773 16.5821.1411,5851,324 Age 65 and over 25.20

2012 Est. Median Age 45.52 41.6252.42

2012 Est. Average Age 44.70 41.7049.10


Prepared By:

Prepared For:


133 OfPage



www.claritas.com

www.sitereports.com





Radius 3Radius 2



2012 Est. Male Population by Age 26,501 76,3932,447

4,103 5.374.571,21185 Age 0 - 4 3.47

4,357 5.704.941,30992 Age 5 - 9 3.76

4,067 5.324.731,25397 Age 10 - 14 3.96

2,551 3.343.0380268 Age 15 - 17 2.78

2,270 2.972.7272248 Age 18 - 20 1.96

3,168 4.153.7098079 Age 21 - 24 3.23

12,314 16.1215.134,009234 Age 25 - 34 9.56

11,346 14.8514.203,763350 Age 35 - 44 14.30

11,337 14.8414.153,751300 Age 45 - 54 12.26

9,980 13.0614.213,766483 Age 55 - 64 19.74

5,337 6.999.002,386318 Age 65 - 74 13.00

3,992 5.237.051,869221 Age 75 - 84 9.03

1,569 2.052.5768172 Age 85 and over 2.94

2012 Est. Median Age, Male 42.88 39.7350.68

2012 Est. Average Age, Male 42.90 40.2047.80

2012 Est. Female Population by Age 28,303 79,0342,807

3,657 4.633.861,09278 Age 0 - 4 2.78

4,286 5.424.531,28290 Age 5 - 9 3.21

3,924 4.964.151,17579 Age 10 - 14 2.81

2,371 3.002.6775655 Age 15 - 17 1.96

2,122 2.682.3767146 Age 18 - 20 1.64

3,117 3.943.4597673 Age 21 - 24 2.60

10,814 13.6811.943,379233 Age 25 - 34 8.30

10,694 13.5312.763,611396 Age 35 - 44 14.11

11,967 15.1414.494,100408 Age 45 - 54 14.54

11,207 14.1816.294,611637 Age 55 - 64 22.69

6,482 8.2010.312,919351 Age 65 - 74 12.50

5,505 6.979.152,590256 Age 75 - 84 9.12

2,888 3.654.031,141106 Age 85 and over 3.78

2012 Est. Median Age, Female 47.95 43.6353.67

2012 Est. Average Age, Female 46.40 43.2050.30


Prepared By:

Prepared For:


134 OfPage



www.claritas.com

www.sitereports.com





Radius 3Radius 2



2012 Est. Pop Age 15+ by Marital Status 47,482 131,0314,734

43,832 33.4531.4114,9141,419 Total, Never Married 29.97

24,638 18.8017.028,080731 Males, Never Married 15.44

19,193 14.6514.396,834688 Females, Never Married 14.53

53,906 41.1441.8619,8752,028 Married, Spouse present 42.84

4,542 3.472.501,188118 Married, Spouse absent 2.49

9,683 7.398.854,200398 Widowed 8.41

2,141 1.632.04970109 Males Widowed 2.30

7,542 5.766.803,229289 Females Widowed 6.10

19,069 14.5515.387,305771 Divorced 16.29

7,433 5.675.912,807261 Males Divorced 5.51

11,636 8.889.474,498511 Females Divorced 10.79

2012 Est. Pop. Age 25+ by Edu. Attainment 42,574 115,4334,365

3,349 2.901.8478427 Less than 9th grade 0.62

4,529 3.923.721,58585 Some High School, no diploma 1.95

20,737 17.9615.936,783577 High School Graduate (or GED) 13.22

26,653 23.0923.089,8241,001 Some College, no degree 22.93

7,211 6.256.172,628226 Associate Degree 5.18

32,550 28.2029.2212,4421,494 Bachelor's Degree 34.23

12,679 10.9812.665,389566 Master's Degree 12.97

5,779 5.015.682,420321 Professional School Degree 7.35

1,946 1.691.6971868 Doctorate Degree 1.56

2012 Est Pop Age 25+ by Edu. Attain, Hisp. or Lat 2,408 10,948151

1,668 15.249.472283 Less than 9th grade 1.99

1,535 14.0210.5925519 Some High School, no diploma 12.58

2,351 21.4723.7557242 High School Graduate (or GED) 27.81

2,196 20.0618.7745237 Some College, no degree 24.50

919 8.3910.0124118 Associate Degree 11.92

1,492 13.6317.6942629 Bachelor's Degree 19.21

787 7.199.762354 Graduate or Professional Degree 2.65


Prepared By:

Prepared For:


135 OfPage



www.claritas.com

www.sitereports.com





Radius 3Radius 2



Households

75,65628,8323,060 2017 Projection

74,47428,1772,949 2012 Estimate

74,99828,1352,861 2000 Census

65,07724,5052,356 1990 Census

1.59%2.32%3.76% Growth 2012-2017

-0.70%0.15%3.08% Growth 2000-2012

15.25%14.81%21.43% Growth 1990-2000

2012 Est. Households by Household Type 28,177 74,4742,949

40,202 53.9852.2314,7171,482 Family Households 50.25

34,271 46.0247.7713,4601,467 Nonfamily Households 49.75

2012 Est. Group Quarters Population 89 8599

2012 HHs by Ethnicity, Hispanic/Latino 3.29 4.75 8.081,339 6,01697

2012 Est. HHs by HH Income 28,177 74,4742,949

6,499 8.738.892,504149 Income Less than $15,000 5.05

6,838 9.189.142,575246 Income $15,000 - $24,999 8.34

7,849 10.5410.572,977254 Income $25,000 - $34,999 8.61

11,635 15.6214.944,209416 Income $35,000 - $49,999 14.11

14,166 19.0218.935,333610 Income $50,000 - $74,999 20.68

7,997 10.7410.522,964367 Income $75,000 - $99,999 12.44

5,466 7.347.162,018245 Income $100,000 - $124,999 8.31

3,503 4.705.021,415176 Income $125,000 - $149,999 5.97

3,356 4.514.451,253139 Income $150,000 - $199,999 4.71

5,447 7.317.792,195268 Income $200,000 - $499,999 9.09

1,717 2.312.6173578 Income $500,000 and more 2.64

2012 Est. Average Household Income $92,764 $90,114$101,453

2012 Est. Median Household Income $58,548 $57,792$66,769

2012 Est. Per Capita Income $47,774 $43,433$56,985


Prepared By:

Prepared For:


136 OfPage



www.claritas.com

www.sitereports.com





Radius 3Radius 2



2012 Median HH Inc by Single Race Class. or Ethn

59,26058,59867,071 White Alone

40,07236,66358,583 Black or African American Alone

44,86370,48938,730 American Indian and Alaska Native Alone

62,26674,71170,497 Asian Alone

46,18040,21742,436 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander Alone

44,39260,74268,278 Some Other Race Alone

45,50851,32053,728 Two or More Races

44,26956,54647,807 Hispanic or Latino

59,25758,67167,717 Not Hispanic or Latino

2012 Est. Family HH Type, Presence Own Children 14,717 40,2021,482

10,392 25.8521.993,237217 Married-Couple Family, own children 14.64

20,161 50.1557.048,395991 Married-Couple Family, no own children 66.87

1,240 3.082.2733410 Male Householder, own children 0.67

1,698 4.224.1160529 Male Householder, no own children 1.96

3,687 9.176.961,025100 Female Householder, own children 6.75

3,025 7.527.621,121134 Female Householder, no own children 9.04

2012 Est. Households by Household Size 28,177 74,4742,949

28,200 37.8740.9911,5491,305 1-person household 44.25

27,421 36.8238.6210,8821,249 2-person household 42.35

9,175 12.3210.322,909220 3-person household 7.46

6,116 8.216.591,858115 4-person household 3.90

2,392 3.212.4869944 5-person household 1.49

864 1.160.7922413 6-person household 0.44

305 0.410.20553 7 or more person household 0.10

2012 Est. Average Household Size 1.94 2.081.78


Prepared By:

Prepared For:


137 OfPage



www.claritas.com

www.sitereports.com





Radius 3Radius 2



2012 Est. Households by Presence of People 28,177 74,4742,949

15,752 21.1516.604,676336Households with 1 or more People under Age 18: 11.39

10,375 65.8668.433,200220 Married-Couple Family 65.48

1,315 8.358.0837811 Other Family, Male Householder 3.27

3,879 24.6322.331,044104 Other Family, Female Householder 30.95

116 0.740.83390 Nonfamily, Male Householder 0.00

67 0.430.30140 Nonfamily, Female Householder 0.00

58,721 78.8583.4023,5012,613Households no People under Age 18: 88.61

18,921 32.2232.797,707930 Married-Couple Family 35.59

1,481 2.522.0347829 Other Family, Male Householder 1.11

2,610 4.444.19985130 Other Family, Female Householder 4.98

16,308 27.7726.526,232673 Nonfamily, Male Householder 25.76

19,401 33.0434.478,100852 Nonfamily, Female Householder 32.61

2012 Est. Households by Number of Vehicles 28,177 74,4742,949

4,831 6.495.131,44652 No Vehicles 1.76

32,636 43.8245.6312,8571,242 1 Vehicle 42.12

26,509 35.5935.149,9001,210 2 Vehicles 41.03

7,623 10.2410.222,880317 3 Vehicles 10.75

2,247 3.023.14885109 4 Vehicles 3.70

628 0.840.7420919 5 or more Vehicles 0.64

2012 Est. Average Number of Vehicles 1.64 1.631.75

Family Households

40,79415,0001,537 2017 Projection

40,20214,7171,482 2012 Estimate

42,25615,4201,514 2000 Census

40,95415,1771,441 1990 Census

1.47%1.92%3.71% Growth 2012-2017

-4.86%-4.56%-2.11% Growth 2000-2012

3.18%1.60%5.07% Growth 1990-2000

2012 Est. Families by Poverty Status 14,717 40,2021,482

37,551 93.4194.8413,9581,445 2012 Families at or Above Poverty 97.50

14,432 35.9030.674,513323 2012 Families at or Above Poverty with Children 21.79

2,651 6.595.1675937 2012 Families Below Poverty 2.50

1,810 4.502.7240115 2012 Families Below Poverty with Children 1.01


Prepared By:

Prepared For:


138 OfPage



www.claritas.com

www.sitereports.com





Radius 3Radius 2



2012 Est. Pop Age 16+ by Employment Status 46,953 129,3294,689

139 0.110.231072 In Armed Forces 0.04

76,108 58.8556.4826,5212,794 Civilian - Employed 59.59

5,356 4.143.381,58743 Civilian - Unemployed 0.92

47,726 36.9039.9118,7381,851 Not in Labor Force 39.48

2012 Est. Civ Employed Pop 16+ Class of Worker 27,756 79,4802,786

53,618 67.4666.0118,3211,607 For-Profit Private Workers 57.68

5,063 6.376.001,665155 Non-Profit Private Workers 5.56

4,150 5.225.351,486152 Local Government Workers 5.46

2,321 2.922.6373034 State Government Workers 1.22

1,116 1.401.6345230 Federal Government Workers 1.08

13,159 16.5618.305,080808 Self-Emp Workers 29.00

55 0.070.08221 Unpaid Family Workers 0.04

2012 Est. Civ Employed Pop 16+ by Occupation 27,756 79,4802,786

1,377 1.731.6746331 Architect/Engineer 1.11

2,273 2.862.49692103 Arts/Entertain/Sports 3.70

2,089 2.632.1258913 Building Grounds Maint 0.47

5,652 7.118.752,428298 Business/Financial Ops 10.70

1,222 1.541.7348141 Community/Soc Svcs 1.47

2,035 2.562.3866134 Computer/Mathematical 1.22

2,011 2.532.56710107 Construction/Extraction 3.84

3,920 4.934.411,225117 Edu/Training/Library 4.20

52 0.070.12332 Farm/Fish/Forestry 0.07

5,720 7.206.351,763137 Food Prep/Serving 4.92

5,651 7.116.941,927183 Health Practitioner/Tec 6.57

1,115 1.401.5743728 Healthcare Support 1.01

1,272 1.601.3537418 Maintenance Repair 0.65

2,131 2.682.60721109 Legal 3.91

776 0.980.9426060 Life/Phys/Soc Science 2.15

11,140 14.0214.604,052341 Management 12.24

9,901 12.4612.883,576433 Office/Admin Support 15.54

1,717 2.161.6445527 Production 0.97

899 1.130.8122420 Protective Svcs 0.72

13,318 16.7617.614,889510 Sales/Related 18.31

3,014 3.793.881,078140 Personal Care/Svc 5.03

2,196 2.762.5871734 Transportation/Moving 1.22


Prepared By:

Prepared For:


139 OfPage



www.claritas.com

www.sitereports.com





Radius 3Radius 2



2012 Est. Pop 16+ by Occupation Classification 27,756 79,4802,786

7,196 9.058.132,256186 Blue Collar 6.68

59,396 74.7377.0121,3752,261 White Collar 81.16

12,889 16.2214.864,125339 Service and Farm 12.17

2012 Est. Workers Age 16+, Transp. To Work 27,352 78,3882,737

61,198 78.0777.6921,2502,107 Drove Alone 76.98

5,620 7.176.811,86496 Car Pooled 3.51

1,773 2.261.6645511 Public Transportation 0.40

1,907 2.432.3965427 Walked 0.99

1,384 1.771.7547828 Bicycle 1.02

905 1.151.2433870 Other Means 2.56

5,602 7.158.452,312398 Worked at Home 14.54

2012 Est. Workers Age 16+ by Travel Time to Work *

22,8297,897701 Less than 15 Minutes

33,53111,3301,159 15 - 29 Minutes

13,4364,681488 30 - 44 Minutes

2,30084339 45 - 59 Minutes

1,65450861 60 or more Minutes

2012 Est. Avg Travel Time to Work in Minutes 22.33 22.2422.79

2012 Est. Tenure of Occupied Housing Units 28,177 74,4742,949

49,799 66.8772.0320,2972,409 Owner Occupied 81.69

24,675 33.1327.977,880541 Renter Occupied 18.35

2012 Owner Occ. HUs: Avg. Length of Residence 17 1715

2012 Renter Occ. HUs: Avg. Length of Residence 6 66


Prepared By:

Prepared For:


1310 OfPage



www.claritas.com

www.sitereports.com





Radius 3Radius 2



2012 Est. All Owner-Occupied Housing Values 20,297 49,7992,409

122 0.240.09182 Value Less than $20,000 0.08

183 0.370.23465 Value $20,000 - $39,999 0.21

386 0.780.5611417 Value $40,000 - $59,999 0.71

770 1.551.2224838 Value $60,000 - $79,999 1.58

1,673 3.363.0762471 Value $80,000 - $99,999 2.95

8,921 17.9118.073,668281 Value $100,000 - $149,999 11.66

10,504 21.0920.264,113416 Value $150,000 - $199,999 17.27

9,903 19.8922.574,581695 Value $200,000 - $299,999 28.85

5,136 10.319.561,940294 Value $300,000 - $399,999 12.20

2,924 5.874.84982131 Value $400,000 - $499,999 5.44

4,037 8.116.991,418198 Value $500,000 - $749,999 8.22

2,628 5.285.851,187132 Value $750,000 - $999,999 5.48

2,611 5.246.691,358130 Value $1,000,000 or more 5.40

2012 Est. Median All Owner-Occupied Housing Value $228,744 $223,632$253,950

2012 Est. Housing Units by Units in Structure 35,593 88,9743,925

13,111 14.7422.808,1161,193 1 Unit Attached 30.39

42,345 47.5942.7615,2211,761 1 Unit Detached 44.87

1,264 1.420.9333041 2 Units 1.04

5,225 5.875.251,868169 3 or 4 Units 4.31

15,868 17.8315.385,474600 5 to 19 Units 15.29

3,546 3.993.781,34655 20 to 49 Units 1.40

5,976 6.727.402,63595 50 or More Units 2.42

1,547 1.741.625788 Mobile Home or Trailer 0.20

92 0.100.07242 Boat, RV, Van, etc. 0.05

2012 Est. Housing Units by Year Structure Built 35,593 88,9743,925

1,382 1.551.5053331 Housing Unit Built 2005 or later 0.79

2,917 3.282.8099568 Housing Unit Built 2000 to 2004 1.73

11,068 12.4413.034,636783 Housing Unit Built 1990 to 1999 19.95

21,517 24.1822.738,0911,235 Housing Unit Built 1980 to 1989 31.46

24,112 27.1033.7111,9971,255 Housing Unit Built 1970 to 1979 31.97



974 1.090.9433314 Housing Unit Built 1940 to 1949 0.36

576 0.650.5720415 Housing Unit Built 1939 or Earlier 0.38

2012 Est. Median Year Structure Built ** 1977 19771981


Prepared By:

Prepared For:


1311 OfPage



www.claritas.com

www.sitereports.com


Appendix: Area Listing

Radius Definition:

Block GroupType: Radius 1 Reporting Detail: Aggregate Reporting Level:

Area Name:

SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85253 -Radius

Latitude/LongitudeE LINCOLN DR AT N SCOTTSDALE RD

0.00 1.00

-111.92565533.531447

Radius Definition:


Area Name:



0.00 3.00

-111.92565533.531447

Radius Definition:


Area Name:



0.00 5.00

-111.92565533.531447

1

971031961

Project Information:

Order Number:

Site:


Prepared By:

Prepared For:


1313 OfPage



www.claritas.com

www.sitereports.com

Area Map

N SCOTTSDALE RD AT E LINCOLN DR

SCOTTSDALE,AZ 85253

Coord: 33.531439, -111.925649

Radius - See Appendix for Details

of

© 2006-2011 TomTom

Prepared By:


Nielsen Solution Center 1 800 866 651121PageFri Apr 20, 2012

Prepared For:

Project Code: scottsdale and lincoln

Prepared on:

www.sitereports.com

www.claritas.com

Area Map

Appendix: Area Listing

Radius 1Type:

Area Name:

Radius Definition:

SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85253 0.00 1.00

33.531439 -111.925649N SCOTTSDALE RD AT E LINCOLN DR

Circle/Band:

Center Point:

-

Radius 2Type:

Area Name:

Radius Definition:



Circle/Band:

Center Point:

-

Radius 3Type:

Area Name:

Radius Definition:



Circle/Band:

Center Point:

-

of

© 2006-2011 TomTom

Prepared By:


Nielsen Solution Center 1 800 866 651122PageFri Apr 20, 2012

Prepared For:

Project Code: scottsdale and lincoln

Prepared on:

www.sitereports.com

www.claritas.com

the marketplace at lincoln & scottsdale...the marketplace at lincoln & scottsdale...

Documents