the missouri compromise · the missouri compromise...

28
The Missouri Compromise In the years leading up to the Missouri Compromise of 1820, tensions began to rise between proslavery and antislavery factions within the U.S. Congress and across the country. They reached a boiling point after Missouri’s 1819 request for admission to the Union as a slave state, which threatened to upset the delicate balance between slave states and free states. To keep the peace, Congress orchestrated a twopart compromise, granting Missouri’s request but also admitting Maine as a free state. It also passed an amendment that drew an imaginary line across the former Louisiana Territory, establishing a boundary between free and slave regions that remained the law of the land until it was negated by the Kansas Nebraska Act of 1854. The Missouri Compromise was an effort by Congress to defuse the sectional and political rivalries triggered by the request of Missouri late in 1819 for admission as a state in which slavery would be permitted. At the time, the United States contained twentytwo states, evenly divided between slave and free. Admission of Missouri as a slave state would upset that balance; it would also set a precedent for congressional acquiescence in the expansion of slavery. Earlier in 1819, when Missouri was being organized as a territory, Representative James Tallmadge ofNew York had proposed an amendment that would ultimately have ended slavery there; this effort was defeated, as was a similar effort by Representative John Taylor of New York regarding Arkansas Territory. Did You Know? For his work on the Missouri Compromise, Senator Henry Clay became known as the “Great Pacificator." The extraordinarily bitter debate over Missouri’s application for admission ran from December 1819 to March 1820. Northerners, led by Senator Rufus King of New York, argued that Congress had the power to prohibit slavery in a new state. Southerners like Senator William Pinkney of Maryland held that new states had the same freedom of action as the original thirteen and were thus free to choose slavery if they wished. After the Senate and the House passed different bills and deadlock threatened, a compromise bill was worked out with the following provisions: (1) Missouri was admitted as a slave state and Maine (formerly

Upload: others

Post on 18-Jun-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Missouri Compromise · The Missouri Compromise In#the#years#leading#up#to#the#Missouri#Compromise#of#1820,tensions#began#to#rise#between# pro=slavery#and#anti=slavery#factions#within#the#U.S.Congress#and#across#the#country.They#

The Missouri Compromise

In  the  years  leading  up  to  the  Missouri  Compromise  of  1820,  tensions  began  to  rise  between  

pro-­‐slavery  and  anti-­‐slavery  factions  within  the  U.S.  Congress  and  across  the  country.  They  

reached  a  boiling  point  after  Missouri’s  1819  request  for  admission  to  the  Union  as  a  slave  

state,  which  threatened  to  upset  the  delicate  balance  between  slave  states  and  free  states.  

To  keep  the  peace,  Congress  orchestrated  a  two-­‐part  compromise,  granting  Missouri’s  

request  but  also  admitting  Maine  as  a  free  state.  It  also  passed  an  amendment  that  drew  an  

imaginary  line  across  the  former  Louisiana  Territory,  establishing  a  boundary  between  free  

and  slave  regions  that  remained  the  law  of  the  land  until  it  was  negated  by  the  Kansas-­‐

Nebraska  Act  of  1854.  

The  Missouri  Compromise  was  an  effort  by  Congress  to  defuse  the  sectional  and  political  

rivalries  triggered  by  the  request  of  Missouri  late  in  1819  for  admission  as  a  state  in  which  

slavery  would  be  permitted.  At  the  time,  the  United  States  contained  twenty-­‐two  states,  

evenly  divided  between  slave  and  free.  Admission  of  Missouri  as  a  slave  state  would  upset  

that  balance;  it  would  also  set  a  precedent  for  congressional  acquiescence  in  the  expansion  

of  slavery.  Earlier  in  1819,  when  Missouri  was  being  organized  as  a  territory,  Representative  

James  Tallmadge  ofNew  York  had  proposed  an  amendment  that  would  ultimately  have  

ended  slavery  there;  this  effort  was  defeated,  as  was  a  similar  effort  by  Representative  John  

Taylor  of  New  York  regarding  Arkansas  Territory.  

Did  You  Know?  For  his  work  on  the  Missouri  Compromise,  Senator  Henry  Clay  became  known  as  the  “Great  Pacificator."  

The  extraordinarily  bitter  debate  over  Missouri’s  application  for  admission  ran  from  

December  1819  to  March  1820.  Northerners,  led  by  Senator  Rufus  King  of  New  York,  argued  

that  Congress  had  the  power  to  prohibit  slavery  in  a  new  state.  Southerners  like  Senator  

William  Pinkney  of  Maryland  held  that  new  states  had  the  same  freedom  of  action  as  the  

original  thirteen  and  were  thus  free  to  choose  slavery  if  they  wished.  After  the  Senate  and  

the  House  passed  different  bills  and  deadlock  threatened,  a  compromise  bill  was  worked  out  

with  the  following  provisions:  (1)  Missouri  was  admitted  as  a  slave  state  and  Maine  (formerly  

Page 2: The Missouri Compromise · The Missouri Compromise In#the#years#leading#up#to#the#Missouri#Compromise#of#1820,tensions#began#to#rise#between# pro=slavery#and#anti=slavery#factions#within#the#U.S.Congress#and#across#the#country.They#

part  ofMassachusetts)  as  free,  and  (2)  except  for  Missouri,  slavery  was  to  be  excluded  from  

the  Louisiana  Purchase  lands  north  of  latitude  36°30′.  

The  Missouri  Compromise  was  criticized  by  many  southerners  because  it  established  the  

principle  that  Congress  could  make  laws  regarding  slavery;  northerners,  on  the  other  hand,  

condemned  it  for  acquiescing  in  the  expansion  of  slavery  (though  only  south  of  the  

compromise  line).  Nevertheless,  the  act  helped  hold  the  Union  together  for  more  than  thirty  

years.  It  was  repealed  by  theKansas-­‐Nebraska  Act  of  1854,  which  established  popular  

sovereignty  (local  choice)  regarding  slavery  in  Kansas  and  Nebraska,  though  both  were  

north  of  the  compromise  line.  Three  years  later,  the  Supreme  Court  in  the  Dred  Scott  case  

declared  the  Missouri  Compromise  unconstitutional,  on  the  ground  that  Congress  was  

prohibited  by  the  Fifth  Amendment  from  depriving  individuals  of  private  property  without  

due  process  of  law.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 3: The Missouri Compromise · The Missouri Compromise In#the#years#leading#up#to#the#Missouri#Compromise#of#1820,tensions#began#to#rise#between# pro=slavery#and#anti=slavery#factions#within#the#U.S.Congress#and#across#the#country.They#

MARCH 06, 1857 : DRED SCOTT DECISION

 

On  this  day  in  1857,  the  United  States  Supreme  Court  issues  a  decision  in  the  Dred  Scott  

case,  affirming  the  right  of  slave  owners  to  take  their  slaves  into  the  Western  territories,  

thereby  negating  the  doctrine  of  popular  sovereignty  and  severely  undermining  the  

platform  of  the  newly  created  Republican  Party.  

At  the  heart  of  the  case  was  the  most  important  question  of  the  1850s:  Should  slavery  be  

allowed  in  the  West?  As  part  of  the  Compromise  of  1850,  residents  of  newly  created  

territories  could  decide  the  issue  of  slavery  by  vote,  a  process  known  as  popular  sovereignty.  

When  popular  sovereignty  was  applied  in  Kansas  in  1854,  however,  violence  erupted.  

Americans  hoped  that  the  Supreme  Court  could  settle  the  issue  that  had  eluded  a  

congressional  solution.  

Dred  Scott  was  a  slave  whose  owner,  an  army  doctor,  had  spent  time  in  Illinois,  a  free  state,  

and  Wisconsin,  a  free  territory  at  the  time  of  Scott’s  residence.  The  Supreme  Court  was  

stacked  in  favor  of  the  slave  states.  Five  of  the  nine  justices  were  from  the  South  while  

another,  Robert  Grier  of  Pennsylvania,  was  staunchly  pro-­‐slavery.  Chief  Justice  Roger  B.  

Taney  wrote  the  majority  decision,  which  was  issued  on  March  6,  1857.  The  court  held  that  

Scott  was  not  free  based  on  his  residence  in  either  Illinois  or  Wisconsin  because  he  was  not  

considered  a  person  under  the  U.S.  Constitution–in  the  opinion  of  the  justices,  black  people  

were  not  considered  citizens  when  the  Constitution  was  drafted  in  1787.  According  to  Taney,  

Dred  Scott  was  the  property  of  his  owner,  and  property  could  not  be  taken  from  a  person  

without  due  process  of  law.  

In  fact,  there  were  free  black  citizens  of  the  United  States  in  1787,  but  Taney  and  the  other  

justices  were  attempting  to  halt  further  debate  on  the  issue  of  slavery  in  the  territories.  The  

decision  inflamed  regional  tensions,  which  burned  for  another  four  years  before  exploding  

into  the  Civil  War.  

Page 4: The Missouri Compromise · The Missouri Compromise In#the#years#leading#up#to#the#Missouri#Compromise#of#1820,tensions#began#to#rise#between# pro=slavery#and#anti=slavery#factions#within#the#U.S.Congress#and#across#the#country.They#

AMERICAN CIVIL WAR HISTORY: STATES RIGHTS

 

In  the  spring  of  1861,  decades  of  simmering  tensions  between  the  northern  and  southern  

United  States  over  issues  including  states’  rights  versus  federal  authority,  westward  

expansion  and  slavery  exploded  into  the  American  Civil  War  (1861-­‐65).  The  election  of  the  

anti-­‐slavery  Republican  Abraham  Lincoln  as  president  in  1860  caused  seven  southern  states  

to  secede  from  the  Union  to  form  the  Confederate  States  of  America;  four  more  joined  them  

after  the  first  shots  of  the  Civil  War  were  fired.  Four  years  of  brutal  conflict  were  marked  by  

historic  battles  at  Bull  Run  (Manassas),  Antietam,  Chancellorsville,  Gettysburg  and  

Vicksburg,  among  others.  The  War  Between  the  States,  as  the  Civil  War  was  also  known,  

pitted  neighbor  against  neighbor  and  in  some  cases,  brother  against  brother.  By  the  time  it  

ended  in  Confederate  surrender  in  1865,  the  Civil  War  proved  to  be  the  costliest  war  ever  

fought  on  American  soil,  with  some  620,000  of  2.4  million  soldiers  killed,  millions  more  

injured  and  the  population  and  territory  of  the  South  devastated.  

CIVIL  WAR  BACKGROUND  

In  the  mid-­‐19th  century,  while  the  United  States  was  experiencing  an  era  of  tremendous  

growth,  a  fundamental  economic  difference  existed  between  the  country’s  northern  and  

southern  regions.  While  in  the  North,  manufacturing  and  industry  was  well  established,  and  

agriculture  was  mostly  limited  to  small-­‐scale  farms,  the  South’s  economy  was  based  on  a  

system  of  large-­‐scale  farming  that  depended  on  the  labor  of  black  slaves  to  grow  certain  

crops,  especially  cotton  and  tobacco.  Growing  abolitionist  sentiment  in  the  North  after  the  

1830s  and  northern  opposition  to  slavery’s  extension  into  the  new  western  territories  led  

many  southerners  to  fear  that  the  existence  of  slavery  in  America–and  thus  the  backbone  of  

their  economy–was  in  danger.  

DID  YOU  KNOW?  

Confederate  General  Thomas  Jonathan  Jackson  earned  his  famous  nickname,  "Stonewall,"  

from  his  steadfast  defensive  efforts  in  the  First  Battle  of  Bull  Run  (First  Manassas).  At  

Page 5: The Missouri Compromise · The Missouri Compromise In#the#years#leading#up#to#the#Missouri#Compromise#of#1820,tensions#began#to#rise#between# pro=slavery#and#anti=slavery#factions#within#the#U.S.Congress#and#across#the#country.They#

Chancellorsville,  Jackson  was  shot  by  one  of  his  own  men,  who  mistook  him  for  Union  

cavalry.  His  arm  was  amputated,  and  he  died  from  pneumonia  eight  days  later.  

In  1854,  the  U.S.  Congress  passed  the  Kansas-­‐Nebraska  Act,  which  essentially  opened  all  new  

territories  to  slavery  by  asserting  the  rule  of  popular  sovereignty  over  congressional  edict.  

Pro-­‐  and  anti-­‐slavery  forces  struggled  violently  in  “Bleeding  Kansas,”  while  opposition  to  the  

act  in  the  North  led  to  the  formation  of  the  Republican  Party,  a  new  political  entity  based  on  

the  principle  of  opposing  slavery’s  extension  into  the  western  territories.  After  the  Supreme  

Court’s  ruling  in  the  Dred  Scott  case  (1857)  confirmed  the  legality  of  slavery  in  the  territories,  

the  abolitionist  John  Brown’s  raid  at  Harper’s  Ferry  in  1859  convinced  more  and  more  

southerners  that  their  northern  neighbors  were  bent  on  the  destruction  of  the  “peculiar  

institution”  that  sustained  them.  Lincoln’s  election  in  November  1860  was  the  final  straw,  

and  within  three  months  seven  southern  states–South  

Carolina,  Mississippi,  Florida,  Alabama,  Georgia,  Louisiana  and  Texas–had  seceded  from  the  

United  States.  

 OUTBREAK  OF  THE  CIVIL  WAR  (1861)  

Even  as  Lincoln  took  office  in  March  1861,  Confederate  forces  threatened  the  federal-­‐

held  Fort  Sumter  in  Charleston,  South  Carolina.  On  April  12,  after  Lincoln  ordered  a  fleet  to  

resupply  Sumter,  Confederate  artillery  fired  the  first  shots  of  the  Civil  War.  Sumter’s  

commander,  Major  Robert  Anderson,  surrendered  after  less  than  two  days  of  

bombardment,  leaving  the  fort  in  the  hands  of  Confederate  forces  under  Pierre  G.T.  

Beauregard.  Four  more  southern  states–Virginia, Arkansas,  North  Carolina  and  Tennessee–joined  the  Confederacy  after  Fort  Sumter.  Border  slave  states  like  Missouri, Kentucky  and  Maryland  did  not  secede,  but  there  was  much  Confederate  sympathy  among  

their  citizens.  

 

Though  on  the  surface  the  Civil  War  may  have  seemed  a  lopsided  conflict,  with  the  23  states  

of  the  Union  enjoying  an  enormous  advantage  in  population,  manufacturing  (including  arms  

production)  and  railroad  construction,  the  Confederates  had  a  strong  military  tradition,  

along  with  some  of  the  best  soldiers  and  commanders  in  the  nation.  They  also  had  a  cause  

they  believed  in:  preserving  their  long-­‐held  traditions  and  institutions,  chief  among  these  

being  slavery.  In  the  First  Battle  of  Bull  Run  (known  in  the  South  as  First  Manassas)  on  July  

Page 6: The Missouri Compromise · The Missouri Compromise In#the#years#leading#up#to#the#Missouri#Compromise#of#1820,tensions#began#to#rise#between# pro=slavery#and#anti=slavery#factions#within#the#U.S.Congress#and#across#the#country.They#

21,  1861,  35,000  Confederate  soldiers  under  the  command  of  Thomas  Jonathan  “Stonewall”  

Jackson  forced  a  greater  number  of  Union  forces  (or  Federals)  to  retreat  

towards  Washington,  D.C.,  dashing  any  hopes  of  a  quick  Union  victory  and  leading  Lincoln  to  

call  for  500,000  more  recruits.  In  fact,  both  sides’  initial  call  for  troops  had  to  be  widened  

after  it  became  clear  that  the  war  would  not  be  a  limited  or  short  conflict.    

                           

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 7: The Missouri Compromise · The Missouri Compromise In#the#years#leading#up#to#the#Missouri#Compromise#of#1820,tensions#began#to#rise#between# pro=slavery#and#anti=slavery#factions#within#the#U.S.Congress#and#across#the#country.They#

ABOLITIONIST MOVEMENT  

The  goal  of  the  abolitionist  movement  was  the  immediate  emancipation  of  all  slaves  and  the  

end  of  racial  discrimination  and  segregation.  Advocating  for  immediate  emancipation  

distinguished  abolitionists  from  more  moderate  anti-­‐slavery  advocates  who  argued  for  

gradual  emancipation,  and  from  free-­‐soil  activists  who  sought  to  restrict  slavery  to  existing  

areas  and  prevent  its  spread  further  west.  Radical  abolitionism  was  partly  fueled  by  the  

religious  fervor  of  the  Second  Great  Awakening,  which  prompted  many  people  to  advocate  

for  emancipation  on  religious  grounds.  Abolitionist  ideas  became  increasingly  prominent  in  

Northern  churches  and  politics  beginning  in  the  1830s,  which  contributed  to  the  regional  

animosity  between  North  and  South  leading  up  to  the  Civil  War.  

From  the  1830s  until  1870,  the  abolitionist  movement  attempted  to  achieve  immediate  

emancipation  of  all  slaves  and  the  ending  of  racial  segregation  and  discrimination.  Their  

propounding  of  these  goals  distinguished  abolitionists  from  the  broad-­‐based  political  

opposition  to  slavery’s  westward  expansion  that  took  form  in  the  North  after  1840  and  

raised  issues  leading  to  the  Civil  War.  Yet  these  two  expressions  of  hostility  to  slavery–

abolitionism  and  Free-­‐Soilism–were  often  closely  related  not  only  in  their  beliefs  and  their  

interaction  but  also  in  the  minds  of  southern  slaveholders  who  finally  came  to  regard  the  

North  as  united  against  them  in  favor  of  black  emancipation.  

DID  YOU  KNOW?  

Female  abolitionists  Elizabeth  Cady  Stanton  and  Lucretia  Mott  went  on  to  become  

prominent  figures  in  the  women's  rights  movement.  

Although  abolitionist  feelings  had  been  strong  during  the  American  Revolution  and  in  the  

Upper  South  during  the  1820s,  the  abolitionist  movement  did  not  coalesce  into  a  militant  

crusade  until  the  1830s.  In  the  previous  decade,  as  much  of  the  North  underwent  the  social  

disruption  associated  with  the  spread  of  manufacturing  and  commerce,  powerful  

evangelical  religious  movements  arose  to  impart  spiritual  direction  to  society.  By  stressing  

the  moral  imperative  to  end  sinful  practices  and  each  person’s  responsibility  to  uphold  God’s  

Page 8: The Missouri Compromise · The Missouri Compromise In#the#years#leading#up#to#the#Missouri#Compromise#of#1820,tensions#began#to#rise#between# pro=slavery#and#anti=slavery#factions#within#the#U.S.Congress#and#across#the#country.They#

will  in  society,  preachers  like  Lyman  Beecher,  Nathaniel  Taylor,  and  Charles  G.  Finney  in  what  

came  to  be  called  the  Second  Great  Awakening  led  massive  religious  revivals  in  the  1820s  

that  gave  a  major  impetus  to  the  later  emergence  of  abolitionism  as  well  as  to  such  other  

reforming  crusades  as  temperance,  pacifism,  and  women’s  rights.  By  the  early  1830s,  

Theodore  D.  Weld,  William  Lloyd  Garrison,  Arthur  and  Lewis  Tappan,  and  Elizur  Wright,  Jr.,  

all  spiritually  nourished  by  revivalism,  had  taken  up  the  cause  of  “immediate  emancipation.”  

In  early  1831,  Garrison,  in  Boston,  began  publishing  his  famous  newspaper,  

the  Liberator,  supported  largely  by  free  African-­‐Americans,  who  always  played  a  major  role  

in  the  movement.  In  December  1833,  the  Tappans,  Garrison,  and  sixty  other  delegates  of  

both  races  and  genders  met  in  Philadelphia  to  found  the  American  Anti-­‐Slavery  Society,  

which  denounced  slavery  as  a  sin  that  must  be  abolished  immediately,  endorsed  

nonviolence,  and  condemned  racial  prejudice.  By  1835,  the  society  had  received  substantial  

moral  and  financial  support  from  African-­‐American  communities  in  the  North  and  had  

established  hundreds  of  branches  throughout  the  free  states,  flooding  the  North  with  

antislavery  literature,  agents,  and  petitions  demanding  that  Congress  end  all  federal  support  

for  slavery.  The  society,  which  attracted  significant  participation  by  women,  also  denounced  

the  American  Colonization  Society’s  program  of  voluntary  gradual  emancipation  and  black  

emigration.  

 

All  these  activities  provoked  widespread  hostile  responses  from  North  and  South,  most  

notably  violent  mobs,  the  burning  of  mailbags  containing  abolitionist  literature,  and  the  

passage  in  the  U.S.  House  of  Representatives  of  a  “gag  rule”  that  banned  consideration  of  

antislavery  petitions.  These  developments,  and  especially  the  1837  murder  of  abolitionist  

editor  Elijah  Lovejoy,  led  many  northerners,  fearful  for  their  own  civil  liberties,  to  vote  for  

antislavery  politicians  and  brought  important  converts  such  as  Wendell  Phillips,  Gerrit  Smith,  

and  Edmund  Quincy  to  the  cause.  

But  as  antislavery  sentiment  began  to  appear  in  politics,  abolitionists  also  began  disagreeing  

among  themselves.  By  1840  Garrison  and  his  followers  were  convinced  that  since  slavery’s  

influence  had  corrupted  all  of  society,  a  revolutionary  change  in  America’s  spiritual  values  

was  required  to  achieve  emancipation.  To  this  demand  for  “moral  suasion,”  Garrison  added  

an  insistence  on  equal  rights  for  women  within  the  movement  and  a  studious  avoidance  of  

“corrupt”  political  parties  and  churches.  To  Garrison’s  opponents,  such  ideas  seemed  wholly  

Page 9: The Missouri Compromise · The Missouri Compromise In#the#years#leading#up#to#the#Missouri#Compromise#of#1820,tensions#began#to#rise#between# pro=slavery#and#anti=slavery#factions#within#the#U.S.Congress#and#across#the#country.They#

at  odds  with  Christian  values  and  the  imperative  to  influence  the  political  and  ecclesiastical  

systems  by  nominating  and  voting  for  candidates  committed  to  abolitionism.  Disputes  over  

these  matters  split  the  American  Anti-­‐Slavery  Society  in  1840,  leaving  Garrison  and  his  

supporters  in  command  of  that  body;  his  opponents,  led  by  the  Tappans,  founded  the  

American  and  Foreign  Anti-­‐Slavery  Society.  Meanwhile,  still  other  foes  of  Garrison  launched  

the  Liberty  party  with  James  G.  Birney  as  its  presidential  candidate  in  the  elections  of  1840  

and  1844.  

Although  historians  debate  the  extent  of  the  abolitionists’  influence  on  the  nation’s  political  

life  after  1840,  their  impact  on  northern  culture  and  society  is  undeniable.  As  

speakers,  Frederick  Douglass,  Wendell  Phillips,  and  Lucy  Stone  in  particular  became  

extremely  well  known.  In  popular  literature  the  poetry  of  John  Greenleaf  Whittier  and  James  

Russell  Lowell  circulated  widely,  as  did  the  autobiographies  of  fugitive  slaves  such  as  

Douglass,  William  and  Ellen  Craft,  and  Solomon  Northrup.  Abolitionists  exercised  a  

particularly  strong  influence  on  religious  life,  contributing  heavily  to  schisms  that  separated  

the  Methodists  (1844)  and  Baptists  (1845),  while  founding  numerous  independent  

antislavery  “free  churches.”  In  higher  education  abolitionists  founded  Oberlin  College,  the  

nation’s  first  experiment  in  racially  integrated  coeducation,  the  Oneida  Institute,  which  

graduated  an  impressive  group  of  African-­‐American  leaders,  and  Illinois’s  Knox  College,  a  

western  center  of  abolitionism.  

 

Within  the  Garrisonian  wing  of  the  movement,  female  abolitionists  became  leaders  of  the  

nation’s  first  independent  feminist  movement,  instrumental  in  organizing  the  1848  Seneca  

Falls  Convention.  Although  African-­‐American  activists  often  complained  with  reason  of  the  

racist  and  patronizing  behavior  of  white  abolitionists,  the  whites  did  support  independently  

conducted  crusades  by  African-­‐Americans  to  outlaw  segregation  and  improve  education  

during  the  1840s  and  1850s.  Especially  after  the  passage  of  the  1850  Fugitive  Slave  Law,  

white  abolitionists  also  protected  African-­‐Americans  threatened  with  capture  as  escapees  

from  bondage,  although  blacks  themselves  largely  managed  theUnderground  Railroad.  

By  the  later  1850s,  organized  abolitionism  in  politics  had  been  subsumed  by  the  larger  

sectional  crisis  over  slavery  prompted  by  the  Kansas-­‐Nebraska  Act,  the  Dred  Scott  decision,  

and  John  Brown’s  raid  on  Harpers  Ferry.  Most  abolitionists  reluctantly  supported  the  

Republican  party,  stood  by  the  Union  in  the  secession  crisis,  and  became  militant  champions  

Page 10: The Missouri Compromise · The Missouri Compromise In#the#years#leading#up#to#the#Missouri#Compromise#of#1820,tensions#began#to#rise#between# pro=slavery#and#anti=slavery#factions#within#the#U.S.Congress#and#across#the#country.They#

of  military  emancipation  during  the  Civil  War.  The  movement  again  split  in  1865,  when  

Garrison  and  his  supporters  asserted  that  the  passage  of  the  Thirteenth  

Amendment  abolishing  slavery  made  continuation  of  the  American  Anti-­‐Slavery  Society  

unnecessary.  But  a  larger  group  led  by  Wendell  Phillips,  insisting  that  only  the  achievement  

of  complete  political  equality  for  all  black  males  could  guarantee  the  freedom  of  the  former  

slaves,  successfully  prevented  Garrison  from  dissolving  the  society.  It  continued  until  1870  to  

demand  land,  the  ballot,  and  education  for  the  freedman.  Only  when  the  Fifteenth  

Amendment  extending  male  suffrage  to  African-­‐Americans  was  passed  did  the  society  

declare  its  mission  completed.  Traditions  of  racial  egalitarianism  begun  by  abolitionists  lived  

on,  however,  to  inspire  the  subsequent  founding  of  the  National  Association  for  the  

Advancement  of  Colored  People  in  1909.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 11: The Missouri Compromise · The Missouri Compromise In#the#years#leading#up#to#the#Missouri#Compromise#of#1820,tensions#began#to#rise#between# pro=slavery#and#anti=slavery#factions#within#the#U.S.Congress#and#across#the#country.They#

 

JOHN  BROWN’S  HARPERS  FERRY  

 

In  October  1859,  the  U.S.  military  arsenal  at  Harpers  Ferry  was  the  target  of  an  assault  by  an  

armed  band  of  abolitionists  led  by  John  Brown  (1800-­‐59).  (Originally  part  of  Virginia,  Harpers  

Ferry  is  located  in  the  eastern  panhandle  of  West  Virginia  near  the  convergence  of  the  

Shenandoah  and  Potomac  rivers.)  The  raid  was  intended  to  be  the  first  stage  in  an  elaborate  

plan  to  establish  an  independent  stronghold  of  freed  slaves  in  the  mountains  of  Maryland  

and  Virginia.  Brown  was  captured  during  the  raid  and  later  convicted  of  treason  and  hanged,  

but  the  raid  inflamed  white  Southern  fears  of  slave  rebellions  and  increased  the  mounting  

tension  between  Northern  and  Southern  states  before  the  American  Civil  War  (1861-­‐65).  

JOHN  BROWN:  ABOLITIONIST  LEADER  

Born  in  Connecticut  in  1800  and  raised  in  Ohio,  John  Brown  came  from  a  staunchly  Calvinist  

and  anti-­‐slavery  family.  He  spent  much  of  his  life  failing  at  a  variety  of  businesses–he  

declared  bankruptcy  in  his  early  40s  and  had  more  than  20  lawsuits  filed  against  him.  In  1837,  

his  life  changed  irrevocably  when  he  attended  an  abolition  meeting  in  Cleveland,  during  

which  he  was  so  moved  that  he  publicly  announced  his  dedication  to  destroying  the  

institution  of  slavery.  As  early  as  1848  he  was  formulating  a  plan  to  incite  an  insurrection.    DID  YOU  KNOW?  

Author  Henry  David  Thoreau  was  among  those  who  spoke  out  in  defense  of  John  Brown  

after  his  arrest  following  the  Harpers  Ferry  raid.  Thoreau  penned  an  essay,  “A  Plea  for  

Captain  John  Brown,”  in  support  of  his  fellow  abolitionist.  

In  the  1850s,  Brown  traveled  to  Kansas  with  five  of  his  sons  to  fight  against  the  pro-­‐slavery  

forces  in  the  contest  over  that  territory.  After  pro-­‐slavery  men  raided  the  abolitionist  town  

of  Lawrence  on  May  21,  1856,  Brown  personally  sought  revenge.  Several  days  later,  he  and  

his  sons  attacked  a  group  of  cabins  along  Pottawatomie  Creek.  They  killed  five  men  with  

broad  swords  and  triggered  a  summer  of  guerilla  warfare  in  the  troubled  territory.  One  of  

Brown’s  sons  was  killed  in  the  fighting.  

 

Page 12: The Missouri Compromise · The Missouri Compromise In#the#years#leading#up#to#the#Missouri#Compromise#of#1820,tensions#began#to#rise#between# pro=slavery#and#anti=slavery#factions#within#the#U.S.Congress#and#across#the#country.They#

By  1857,  Brown  returned  to  the  East  and  began  raising  money  to  carry  out  his  vision  of  a  

mass  uprising  of  slaves.  He  secured  the  backing  of  six  prominent  abolitionists,  known  as  the  

“Secret  Six,”  and  assembled  an  invasion  force.  His  “army”  grew  to  include  more  than  20  

men,  including  several  black  men  and  three  of  Brown’s  sons.  The  group  rented  

a  Marylandfarm  near  Harpers  Ferry  and  prepared  for  the  assault.    HARPERS  FERRY  RAID:  OCTOBER  16-­‐18,  1859  

On  the  night  of  October  16,  1859,  Brown  and  his  band  overran  the  federal  arsenal.  Some  of  

his  men  rounded  up  a  handful  of  hostages,  including  a  few  slaves.  Word  of  the  raid  spread  

and  by  the  following  day  Brown  and  his  men  were  surrounded.  On  October  18,  a  company  of  

U.S.  Marines,  led  by  Colonel  Robert  E.  Lee  (1808-­‐70)  and  Lieutenant  J.  E.  B.  Stuart  (1833-­‐64),  

overran  Brown  and  his  followers.  Brown  was  wounded  and  captured,  while  10  of  his  men  

were  killed,  including  two  of  his  sons.    JOHN  BROWN  EXECUTED:  DECEMBER  2,  1859  

Brown  was  tried  by  the  state  of  Virginia  for  treason  and  murder,  and  found  guilty  on  

November  2.The  59-­‐year-­‐old  abolitionist  went  to  the  gallows  on  December  2,  1859.  Before  

his  execution,  he  handed  his  guard  a  slip  of  paper  that  read,  “I,  John  Brown,  am  now  quite  

certain  that  the  crimes  of  this  guilty  land  will  never  be  purged  away  but  with  blood.”  It  was  a  

prophetic  statement.  Although  the  raid  failed,  it  inflamed  sectional  tensions  and  raised  the  

stakes  for  the  1860  presidential  election.  Brown’s  raid  helped  make  any  further  

accommodation  between  North  and  South  nearly  impossible  and  thus  became  an  important  

impetus  of  the  Civil  War.    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 13: The Missouri Compromise · The Missouri Compromise In#the#years#leading#up#to#the#Missouri#Compromise#of#1820,tensions#began#to#rise#between# pro=slavery#and#anti=slavery#factions#within#the#U.S.Congress#and#across#the#country.They#

HARRIET BEECHER STOWE  

Born  in  Litchfield,  Connecticut,  Harriet  Beecher  was  the  seventh  child  of  the  Reverend  

Lyman  Beecher,  a  Congregational  minister  and  moral  reformer,  and  Roxanna  Foote  Beecher.  

She  was  schooled  at  the  Pierce  Academy  and  at  her  sister  Catharine  Beecher’s  Hartford  

Female  Seminary,  where  she  also  taught.  She  moved  with  the  family  to  Cincinnati  in  1832,  

when  her  father  was  appointed  president  of  Lane  Theological  Seminary.  The  spectacle  of  

chattel  slavery  across  the  Ohio  River  in  Kentucky  and  its  effects  on  the  acquiescent  

commercial  interests  of  white  Cincinnati  moved  her  deeply.  

In  1836,  she  married  Calvin  Ellis  Stowe,  professor  of  biblical  literature  at  Lane.  The  death  of  a  

son  in  1849  led  her  away  from  her  father’s  Calvinism  and  gave  supremacy  in  her  views  to  the  

redemptive  spirit  of  Christian  love.  By  1850,  the  family  had  moved  to  Maine,  where,  in  

response  to  the  Fugitive  Slave  Act  of  that  year,  Stowe  wrote  Uncle  Tom’s  Cabin  (1852),  her  

most  celebrated  work.  Sentimental  and  realistic  by  turns,  the  novel  explored  the  cruelties  of  

chattel  slavery  in  the  Upper  and  Lower  South  and  exposed  the  moral  ironies  in  the  legal,  

religious,  and  social  arguments  of  white  apologists.  

The  immense  impact  of  the  novel  (it  sold  300,000  copies  in  its  first  year)  was  unexpected.  

Antislavery  fiction  had  never  sold  well;  Stowe  was  not  an  established  writer,  and  few  would  

have  expected  a  woman  to  gain  a  popular  hearing  on  the  great  political  question  of  the  day.  

Some  female  abolitionists  had  shocked  decorum  in  the  1840s  by  speaking  at  public  

gatherings,  but  they  were  widely  resented.  The  success  of  Uncle  Tom’s  Cabin  went  far  

toward  legitimizing,  if  not  indeed  creating,  a  role  for  women  in  public  affairs.  

 

To  the  dismay  of  many  northern  radicals,  Uncle  Tom’s  Cabin  casually  endorsed  colonization  

rather  than  abolition.  In  fact,  Stowe  was  unconcerned  about  the  tactics  that  made  slavery  a  

political  issue:  for  her,  the  problem  was  religious  and  emotional,  and  one  that  women  were  

best  equipped  to  confront.  Her  stated  purpose,  “to  awaken  sympathy  and  feeling  for  the  

African  race”  and  to  urge  that  readers  “feel  right”  about  the  issue,  belongs  to  a  feminist  and  

utopian  agenda  that  contemporary  readers  were  slow  to  recognize.  In  the  South,  the  book  

Page 14: The Missouri Compromise · The Missouri Compromise In#the#years#leading#up#to#the#Missouri#Compromise#of#1820,tensions#began#to#rise#between# pro=slavery#and#anti=slavery#factions#within#the#U.S.Congress#and#across#the#country.They#

was  read  as  sectional  propaganda;  in  the  North,  it  was  read  as  a  compelling  moral  romance.  

Although  Stowe  blamed  the  slave  system  itself  as  “the  essence  of  all  abuse”  rather  than  the  

slaveholders  and  deliberately  made  its  chief  villain,  Simon  Legree,  a  displaced  New  

Englander,  the  novel’s  effect  was  to  exacerbate  regional  antagonisms.  Indeed,  Uncle  Tom’s  

Cabin,  which  called  forth  anti-­‐Tom  novels  from  southern  writers,  so  raised  the  temperature  

of  the  dialogue  that  Lincoln  would  later,  half-­‐seriously,  apportion  to  Stowe  some  

responsibility  for  starting  the  Civil  War.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         

   

Page 15: The Missouri Compromise · The Missouri Compromise In#the#years#leading#up#to#the#Missouri#Compromise#of#1820,tensions#began#to#rise#between# pro=slavery#and#anti=slavery#factions#within#the#U.S.Congress#and#across#the#country.They#

 HARRIET TUBMAN

 

Harriet  Tubman  became  famous  as  a  “conductor”  on  the  Underground  Railroad  during  the  

turbulent  1850s.  Born  a  slave  on  Maryland’s  eastern  shore,  she  endured  the  harsh  existence  

of  a  field  hand,  including  brutal  beatings.  In  1849  she  fled  slavery,  leaving  her  husband  and  

family  behind  in  order  to  escape.  Despite  a  bounty  on  her  head,  she  returned  to  the  South  at  

least  19  times  to  lead  her  family  and  hundreds  of  other  slaves  to  freedom  via  the  

Underground  Railroad.  Tubman  also  served  as  a  scout,  spy  and  nurse  during  the  Civil  War.  

In  1849  Tubman  fled  Maryland,  leaving  behind  her  free  husband  of  five  years,  John  Tubman,  

and  her  parents,  sisters,  and  brothers.  “Mah  people  mus’  go  free,”  her  constant  refrain,  

suggests  a  determination  uncommon  among  even  the  most  militant  slaves.  She  returned  to  

the  South  at  least  nineteen  times  to  lead  her  family  and  hundreds  of  other  slaves  to  freedom  

via  the  Underground  Railroad.  Utilizing  her  native  intelligence  and  drawing  on  her  boundless  

courage,  she  eluded  bounty  hunters  seeking  a  reward  for  her  capture,  which  eventually  

went  as  high  as  forty  thousand  dollars.  She  never  lost  a  fugitive  or  allowed  one  to  turn  back.    DID  YOU  KNOW?  

Harriet  Tubman's  birth  name  was  Araminta  Ross.  

Two  things  sustained  her:  the  pistol  at  her  side  and  her  faith  in  God.  She  would  not  hesitate  

to  use  the  pistol  in  self-­‐defense,  but  it  was  also  a  symbol  to  instruct  slaves,  making  it  clear  

that  “dead  Negroes  tell  no  tales.”  Timid  slaves  seemed  to  find  courage  in  her  presence;  no  

one  ever  betrayed  her.  She  affirmed  her  faith  in  God  in  her  statement,  “I  always  tole  God,  

I’m  gwine  to  hole  stiddy  on  to  you,  an’  you’ve  got  to  see  me  trou  [through].”  

Tubman  collaborated  with  John  Brown  in  1858  in  planning  his  raid  on  Harpers  Ferry.  The  two  

met  in  Canada  where  she  told  him  all  she  knew  of  the  Underground  Railroad  in  the  East.  

Advising  him  on  the  area  in  which  he  planned  to  operate,  she  promised  to  deliver  aid  from  

fugitives  in  the  region.  Brown’s  admiration  for  her  was  immeasurable,  and  he  wanted  her  to  

Page 16: The Missouri Compromise · The Missouri Compromise In#the#years#leading#up#to#the#Missouri#Compromise#of#1820,tensions#began#to#rise#between# pro=slavery#and#anti=slavery#factions#within#the#U.S.Congress#and#across#the#country.They#

accompany  him  on  the  raid.  Tubman  planned  to  be  present  but  was  ill  at  the  time  and  could  

not  participate.  

 

Tubman’s  resistance  to  slavery  did  not  end  with  the  outbreak  of  the  Civil  War.  Her  services  

as  nurse,  scout,  and  spy  were  solicited  by  the  Union  government.  For  more  than  three  years  

she  nursed  the  sick  and  wounded  in  Florida  and  the  Carolinas,  tending  whites  and  blacks,  

soldiers  and  contrabands.  Tubman  was  a  short  woman  without  distinctive  features.  With  a  

bandanna  on  her  head  and  several  front  teeth  missing,  she  moved  unnoticed  through  rebel  

territory.  This  made  her  invaluable  as  a  scout  and  spy  under  the  command  of  Col.  James  

Montgomery  of  the  Second  Carolina  Volunteers.  As  leader  of  a  corps  of  local  blacks,  she  

made  several  forays  into  rebel  territory,  collecting  information.  Armed  with  knowledge  of  

the  location  of  cotton  warehouses,  ammunition  depots,  and  slaves  waiting  to  be  liberated,  

Colonel  Montgomery  made  several  raids  in  southern  coastal  areas.  Tubman  led  the  way  on  

his  celebrated  expedition  up  the  Combahee  River  in  June  1863.  For  all  of  her  work,  Tubman  

was  paid  only  two  hundred  dollars  over  a  three-­‐year  period  and  had  to  support  herself  by  

selling  pies,  gingerbread,  and  root  beer.  

 

After  the  war,  Tubman  returned  to  Auburn,  New  York,  and  continued  to  help  blacks  forge  

new  lives  in  freedom.  She  cared  for  her  parents  and  other  needy  relatives,  turning  her  

residence  into  the  Home  for  Indigent  and  Aged  Negroes.  Lack  of  money  continued  to  be  a  

pressing  problem,  and  she  financed  the  home  by  selling  copies  of  her  biography  and  giving  

speeches.  Her  most  memorable  appearance  was  at  the  organizing  meeting  of  the  National  

Association  of  Colored  Women  in  1896  in  Washington,  D.C.  Two  generations  came  together  

to  celebrate  the  strength  of  black  women  and  to  continue  their  struggle  for  a  life  of  dignity  

and  respect.  Harriet  Tubman,  the  oldest  member  present,  was  the  embodiment  of  their  

strength  and  their  struggle.    

 

 

 

Page 17: The Missouri Compromise · The Missouri Compromise In#the#years#leading#up#to#the#Missouri#Compromise#of#1820,tensions#began#to#rise#between# pro=slavery#and#anti=slavery#factions#within#the#U.S.Congress#and#across#the#country.They#

 

CONFEDERATE STATES OF AMERICA  

During  the  American  Civil  War,  the  Confederate  States  of  America  consisted  of  the  

governments  of  11  Southern  states  that  seceded  from  the  Union  in  1860-­‐61,  carrying  on  all  

the  affairs  of  a  separate  government  and  conducting  a  major  war  until  defeated  in  the  

spring  of  1865.  Convinced  that  their  way  of  life,  based  on  slavery,  was  irretrievably  

threatened  by  the  election  of  President  Abraham  Lincoln  (November  1860),  the  seven  states  

of  the  Deep  South  (Alabama,  Florida,  Georgia,  Louisiana,  Mississippi,  South  Carolina  and  

Texas)  seceded  from  the  Union  during  the  following  months.  When  the  war  began  with  the  

firing  on  Fort  Sumter  (April  12,  1861),  they  were  joined  by  four  states  of  the  upper  South  

(Arkansas,  North  Carolina,  Tennessee  and  Virginia).  

Formed  in  February  1861,  the  Confederate  States  of  America  was  a  republic  composed  of  

eleven  Southern  states  that  seceded  from  the  Union  in  order  to  preserve  slavery,  states’  

rights,  and  political  liberty  for  whites.  Its  conservative  government,  with  

Mississippian  Jefferson  Davis  as  president,  sought  a  peaceful  separation,  but  the  United  

States  refused  to  acquiesce  in  the  secession.  The  war  that  ensued  started  at  Fort  

Sumter,  South  Carolina,  on  April  12,  1861,  and  lasted  four  years.  It  cost  the  South  nearly  

500,000  men  killed  or  wounded  out  of  a  population  of  9  million  (including  3  million  slaves)  

and  $5  billion  in  treasure.  

 DID  YOU  KNOW?  

On  July  15,  1870,  Georgia  became  the  last  former  Confederate  state  to  be  restored  to  the  

Union,  more  than  five  years  after  the  Civil  War's  end.  

The  Confederacy’s  eastern  military  fortunes  went  well  for  the  first  two  years,  with  major  

victories  at  First  Manassas  (Bull  Run),  ‘Stonewall’  Jackson’s  Valley  Campaign,  and  the  Seven  

Days’  Battles,  where  Gen.  Robert  E.  Lee  took  command  of  the  main  eastern  army  in  June  

1862  and  cleared  Virginia  of  federal  troops  by  September.  His  invasion  of  Maryland  was  

checked  at  Sharpsburg  (Antietam)  in  mid-­‐September,  and  he  returned  to  Virginia,  where  he  

Page 18: The Missouri Compromise · The Missouri Compromise In#the#years#leading#up#to#the#Missouri#Compromise#of#1820,tensions#began#to#rise#between# pro=slavery#and#anti=slavery#factions#within#the#U.S.Congress#and#across#the#country.They#

badly  defeated  federal  forces  at  Fredericksburg  and  Chancellorsville.  The  main  western  

Confederate  forces-­‐commanded  by  Generals  Albert  Sidney  Johnston,  P.  G.  T.  Beauregard,  

and  Braxton  Bragg-­‐suffered  defeats  at  Forts  Henry  and  Donelson  and  Shiloh  in  Tennessee,  

and  at  Corinth,  Mississippi,  but  they  held  that  flank  through  1862.  

 

Davis  formed  his  government  at  the  first  Confederate  capital  in  Montgomery,  Alabama.  The  

Confederacy’s  Permanent  Constitution  provided  for  presidential  item  veto,  debating  seats  

for  cabinet  members,  and  six-­‐year  terms  for  the  president  and  vice  president  (the  president  

was  ineligible  for  successive  terms);  it  prohibited  the  foreign  slave  trade  and  forbade  

Congress  from  levying  a  protective  tariff,  giving  bounties,  or  making  appropriations  for  

internal  improvements.  

 

After  initial  problems,  Davis’s  government  grew  stronger  as  he  learned  to  use  executive  

power  to  consolidate  control  of  the  armed  forces  and  manpower  distribution.  But  some  

Southern  governors  resisted  Davis’s  centralization  and  tried  to  keep  their  men  and  

resources  at  home.  Although  Davis  used  authority  effectively,  the  insistence  on  preserving  

states’  rights  plagued  him  constantly.  Vice  President  Alexander  H.  Stephens,  an  early  

dissident,  for  example,  sulked  in  his  nativeGeorgia  and  finally  urged  its  secession  from  the  

Confederacy.  

 

But  nothing  gave  the  government  more  trouble  than  its  poverty.  There  was  only  $27  million  

worth  of  specie  in  the  Confederacy,  and  money  remained  scarce.  A  federal  blockade  

gradually  shrank  Southern  foreign  trade  and  drained  financial  reserves.  Christopher  G.  

Memminger,  treasury  secretary,  followed  conservative  policies.  A  campaign  to  raise  funds  

through  a  domestic  loan  in  February  1861  lagged;  a  $50  million  loan  drive  launched  in  May  did  

little  better.  Finally  Congress  resorted  to  a  ‘produce  loan,’  which  allowed  planters  to  pledge  

produce  as  security  for  bonds.  Although  initially  popular,  this  expedient  also  failed.  

The  next  resort,  paper  money,  stimulated  inflation,  and  on  April  24,  1863,  Congress  passed  

the  toughest  tax  law  ever  seen  in  the  South.  Rates  were  increased,  an  income  tax  was  

authorized,  and  a  profits  tax  was  imposed  on  farm  products;  farmers  and  planters  were  

subjected  to  a  tax-­‐in-­‐kind,  which  required  them  to  contribute  one-­‐tenth  of  their  annual  crop  

yield  to  the  government.  This  unpopular  law  did  not  solve  the  financial  problems,  however.  

Page 19: The Missouri Compromise · The Missouri Compromise In#the#years#leading#up#to#the#Missouri#Compromise#of#1820,tensions#began#to#rise#between# pro=slavery#and#anti=slavery#factions#within#the#U.S.Congress#and#across#the#country.They#

In  mid-­‐1863,  Memminger  proposed  taking  one-­‐third  of  the  currency  out  of  circulation.  

Congress  resisted,  but  finally,  in  February  1864,  it  passed  a  funding  act  that  created  a  brief  

drop  in  inflation,  which  soon  yielded  to  a  price-­‐and-­‐money  spiral  that  presaged  bankruptcy.  

An  1863  foreign  loan  for  $15  million  through  the  Erlanger  Bank  in  France  realized  only  about  

$9  million  in  purchasing  power.  

Then  the  government  resorted  to  such  desperate  measures  as  impressment  of  private  

produce,  livestock,  machinery,  and  transportation  equipment,  which  brought  limited  relief  

to  the  armies  but  endless  enmity  for  what  was  seen  as  a  ‘despotic’  government.  The  failure  

to  tax  land,  cotton,  and  slaves  earned  cries  of  ‘a  rich  man’s  war  and  a  poor  man’s  fight’  and  

sapped  morale  behind  the  lines.  

The  Confederacy  never  won  the  loyalty  of  the  black  population.  Some  free  blacks  

volunteered  for  Southern  ranks  but  were  rejected.  Federal  invaders  liberated  slaves,  and  

fear  of  insurrections  sapped  Southern  strength  in  the  last  two  war  years.  

Keeping  the  ranks  of  the  armies  filled  became  difficult  as  casualties  mounted  and  

enthusiasm  faded.  In  April  1862,  Congress,  on  the  advice  of  Davis,  passed  the  first  draft  law  

in  American  history,  which  took  into  Confederate  service  all  white  men  between  eighteen  

and  thirty-­‐five.  Liberal  exemptions  (including  one  white  exemption  for  every  twenty  slaves  

owned)  weakened  the  law.  But  the  courts  upheld  it  and  most  people  accepted  it  as  

necessary,  an  attitude  that  persisted  even  after  February  1864,  when  the  age  limits  were  

extended  to  seventeen  and  fifty  and  substitutes  were  prohibited.  In  March  1865  blacks  

finally  were  enrolled  in  Confederate  ranks,  but  very  few  served.  

Taxation,  impressment,  and  conscription-­‐these  were  the  hallmarks  of  a  tough  

administration.  President  Davis  pursued  centralization  much  as  Abraham  Lincoln  did-­‐laissez-­‐

faire  policies  could  not  win  a  modern  war.  The  lessons  learned  in  management,  sacrifice,  

fortitude,  and  logistics  would  change  the  South  permanently.  

Supplying  and  moving  the  armed  forces  became  the  main  work  of  many  in  the  South,  and  

new  methods  of  procurement,  storage,  and  distribution  were  developed.  Railroads  were  

essential  to  the  mass  movement  of  men  and  matériel,  of  ordnance  and  medicine,  and  of  

Page 20: The Missouri Compromise · The Missouri Compromise In#the#years#leading#up#to#the#Missouri#Compromise#of#1820,tensions#began#to#rise#between# pro=slavery#and#anti=slavery#factions#within#the#U.S.Congress#and#across#the#country.They#

civilian  refugees  from  occupied  areas.  Congress  passed  laws  nationalizing  rail  lines,  

sequestering  space  on  blockade  runners,  and  controlling  commerce.  Industrial  development  

had  lagged  in  the  antebellum  South,  and  now  Congress  encouraged  industrialization  by  

siphoning  manpower  and  money  to  companies  producing  war  goods.  A  minor  industrial  

miracle  occurred  in  the  Confederacy:  a  nation  with  minuscule  manufacturing  capacity  

acquired  foundries,  powder  works,  rolling  mills,  arsenals  enough  to  sustain  nearly  a  million  

troops  and  ships  enough  to  scare  American  merchantmen.  The  chief  of  ordnance,  Gen.  

Josiah  Gorgas,  a  Pennsylvanian  and  genius  of  logistics,  supplied  Rebel  munitions  to  the  end.  

Gorgas,  an  advocate  of  blockade  running,  oversaw  the  building  of  small,  fast  ships  capable  

of  eluding  federal  coastal  patrols.  Blockade  running  was  a  very  successful  venture:  at  least  

600,000  rifles  were  imported,  plus  large  quantities  of  cannon,  saltpeter,  lead,  clothing,  

coffee,  and  medicines.  Highly  profitable,  blockade  running  produced  heroes,  villains,  and  

million-­‐  aires-­‐and  sustained  the  Rebels.  

Davis’s  foreign  policy  centered  on  gaining  recognition  by  Great  Britain  and  France.  Napoleon  

III  wanted  a  Confederate  victory  but  hesitated  to  act  without  the  British.  Many  Britons  

sympathized  with  the  Confederates,  but  the  working  class  supported  

Lincoln’s  Emancipation  Proclamation.  Judah  P.  Benjamin,  Confederate  secretary  of  state,  

hoped  that  an  embargo  on  ‘King  Cotton’  would  force  help  from  textile-­‐  producing  countries.  

But  each  time  recognition  was  almost  at  hand,  military  reverses  chilled  prospects.  The  issue  

remained  with  the  Rebel  soldiers:  when  they  won,  independence  came  close;  when  they  

lost,  nothing  else  mattered.  

 

And  they  lost  almost  steadily  after  the  first  terrible  week  of  July  1863.  Defeats  at  Gettysburg  

and  Vicksburg  cost  fifty  thousand  men  and  seventy  thousand  arms.  After  that  week,  long  

retreats  began  in  the  East  through  the  Wilderness,  Spotsylvania,  Cold  Harbor,  Petersburg;  in  

the  West  from  Chickamauga,  Lookout  Mountain/Missionary  Ridge,  Atlanta,  to  Franklin  and  

Nashville,  Tennessee,  which  led  to  Lee’s  surrender  at  Appomattox  and  Joseph  E.  Johnston’s  

at  Durham  Station,  North  Carolina.  

 

Page 21: The Missouri Compromise · The Missouri Compromise In#the#years#leading#up#to#the#Missouri#Compromise#of#1820,tensions#began#to#rise#between# pro=slavery#and#anti=slavery#factions#within#the#U.S.Congress#and#across#the#country.They#

Sustained  for  a  while  by  Davis’s  offensive-­‐defensive  strategy,  Confederate  armies  were  

finally  defeated  by  attrition,  the  country  behind  them  exhausted  and  drained.  The  surprise  is  

not  that  they  lost  but  that  they  persisted  for  four  arduous  years.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 22: The Missouri Compromise · The Missouri Compromise In#the#years#leading#up#to#the#Missouri#Compromise#of#1820,tensions#began#to#rise#between# pro=slavery#and#anti=slavery#factions#within#the#U.S.Congress#and#across#the#country.They#

ABRAHAM LINCOLN  

Abraham  Lincoln,  a  self-­‐taught  Illinois  lawyer  and  legislator  with  a  reputation  as  an  eloquent  

opponent  of  slavery,  shocked  many  when  he  overcame  several  more  prominent  contenders  

to  win  the  Republican  Party’s  nomination  for  president  in  1860.  His  election  that  November  

pushed  several  Southern  states  to  secede  by  the  time  of  his  inauguration  in  March  1861,  and  

the  Civil  War  began  barely  a  month  later.  Contrary  to  expectations,  Lincoln  proved  to  be  a  

shrewd  military  strategist  and  a  savvy  leader  during  what  became  the  costliest  conflict  ever  

fought  on  American  soil.  His  Emancipation  Proclamation,  issued  in  1863,  freed  all  slaves  in  

the  rebellious  states  and  paved  the  way  for  slavery’s  eventual  abolition,  while  his  Gettysburg  

Address  later  that  year  stands  as  one  of  the  most  famous  and  influential  pieces  of  oratory  in  

American  history.  In  April  1865,  with  the  Union  on  the  brink  of  victory,  Abraham  Lincoln  was  

shot  and  killed  by  the  Confederate  sympathizer  John  Wilkes  Booth;  his  untimely  death  made  

him  a  martyr  to  the  cause  of  liberty  and  Union.  Over  the  years  Lincoln’s  mythic  stature  has  

only  grown,  and  he  is  widely  regarded  as  one  of  the  greatest  presidents  in  the  nation’s  

history.  

Lincoln  opposed  the  spread  of  slavery  to  the  territories,  and  had  a  grand  vision  of  the  

expanding  United  States,  with  a  focus  on  commerce  and  cities  rather  than  agriculture.    DID  YOU  KNOW?  

The  war  years  were  difficult  for  Abraham  Lincoln  and  his  family.  After  his  young  son  Willie  

died  of  typhoid  fever  in  1862,  the  emotionally  fragile  Mary  Lincoln,  widely  unpopular  for  her  

frivolity  and  spendthrift  ways,  held  séances  in  the  White  House  in  the  hopes  of  

communicating  with  him,  earning  her  even  more  derision.  

Lincoln  taught  himself  law,  passing  the  bar  examination  in  1836.  The  following  year,  he  

moved  to  the  newly  named  state  capital  of  Springfield.  For  the  next  few  years,  he  worked  

there  as  a  lawyer,  earning  a  reputation  as  “Honest  Abe”  and  serving  clients  ranging  from  

individual  residents  of  small  towns  to  national  railroad  lines.  He  met  Mary  Todd,  a  well-­‐to-­‐do  

Page 23: The Missouri Compromise · The Missouri Compromise In#the#years#leading#up#to#the#Missouri#Compromise#of#1820,tensions#began#to#rise#between# pro=slavery#and#anti=slavery#factions#within#the#U.S.Congress#and#across#the#country.They#

Kentucky  belle  with  many  suitors  (including  Lincoln’s  future  political  rival,  Stephen  Douglas),  

and  they  married  in  1842.  

LINCOLN’S  ROAD  TO  THE  WHITE  HOUSE  

Lincoln  won  election  to  the  U.S.  House  of  Representatives  in  1846  and  began  serving  his  

term  the  following  year.  As  a  congressman,  Lincoln  was  unpopular  with  Illinois  voters  for  his  

strong  stance  against  the  U.S.  war  with  Mexico.  Promising  not  to  seek  reelection,  he  

returned  to  Springfield  in  1849.  Events  conspired  to  push  him  back  into  national  politics,  

however:  Douglas,  a  leading  Democrat  in  Congress,  had  pushed  through  the  passage  of  

the  Kansas-­‐Nebraska  Act  (1854),  which  declared  that  the  voters  of  each  territory,  rather  than  

the  federal  government,  had  the  right  to  decide  whether  the  territory  should  be  slave  or  

free.  On  October  16,  1854,  Lincoln  went  before  a  large  crowd  in  Peoria  to  debate  the  merits  

of  the  Kansas-­‐Nebraska  Act  with  Douglas,  denouncing  slavery  and  its  extension  and  calling  

the  institution  a  violation  of  the  most  basic  tenets  of  the  Declaration  of  Independence.  

 

With  the  Whig  Party  in  ruins,  Lincoln  joined  the  new  Republican  Party–formed  largely  in  

opposition  to  slavery’s  extension  into  the  territories–in  1858  and  ran  for  the  Senate  again  

that  year  (he  had  campaigned  unsuccessfully  for  the  seat  in  1855  as  well).  In  June,  Lincoln  

delivered  his  now-­‐famous  “house  divided”  speech,  in  which  he  quoted  from  the  Gospels  to  

illustrate  his  belief  that  “this  government  cannot  endure,  permanently,  half  slave  and  half  

free.”  Lincoln  then  squared  off  against  Douglas  in  a  series  of  famous  debates;  though  he  lost  

the  election,  Lincoln’s  performance  made  his  reputation  nationally.  His  profile  rose  even  

higher  in  early  1860,  after  he  delivered  another  rousing  speech  at  New  York  City’s  Cooper  

Union.  That  May,  Republicans  chose  Lincoln  as  their  candidate  for  president,  passing  over  

Senator  William  H.  Seward  of  New  York  and  other  powerful  contenders  in  favor  of  the  rangy  

Illinois  lawyer  with  only  one  undistinguished  congressional  term  under  his  belt.    A  WARTIME  PRESIDENT  

In  the  general  election,  Lincoln  again  faced  Douglas,  who  represented  the  northern  

Democrats;  southern  Democrats  had  nominated  John  C.  Breckenridge  of  Kentucky,  while  

John  Bell  ran  for  the  brand  new  Constitutional  Union  Party.  With  Breckenridge  and  Bell  

splitting  the  vote  in  the  South,  Lincoln  won  most  of  the  North  and  carried  the  Electoral  

College.  After  years  of  sectional  tensions,  the  election  of  an  antislavery  northerner  as  the  

Page 24: The Missouri Compromise · The Missouri Compromise In#the#years#leading#up#to#the#Missouri#Compromise#of#1820,tensions#began#to#rise#between# pro=slavery#and#anti=slavery#factions#within#the#U.S.Congress#and#across#the#country.They#

16th  president  of  the  United  States  drove  many  southerners  over  the  brink,  and  by  the  time  

Lincoln  was  inaugurated  in  March  1861  seven  southern  states  had  seceded  from  the  Union  

and  formed  the  Confederate  States  of  America.  After  Lincoln  ordered  a  fleet  of  Union  ships  

to  supply  South  Carolina’s  Fort  Sumter  in  April,  the  Confederates  fired  on  both  the  fort  and  

the  Union  fleet,  beginning  the  Civil  War.  Hopes  for  a  quick  Union  victory  were  dashed  by  

defeat  in  the  Battle  of  Bull  Run  (Manassas),  and  Lincoln  called  for  500,000  more  troops  as  

both  sides  settled  in  for  a  long  conflict.  

 

While  the  Confederate  leader  Jefferson  Davis  was  a  West  Point  graduate,  Mexican  War  hero  

and  former  secretary  of  war,  Lincoln  had  only  a  brief  and  undistinguished  period  of  service  in  

the  Black  Hawk  War  (1832)  to  his  credit.  He  surprised  many  by  proving  to  be  a  more  than  

capable  wartime  leader,  learning  quickly  about  strategy  and  tactics  in  the  early  years  of  the  

Civil  War,  and  about  choosing  the  ablest  commanders.  General  George  McClellan,  though  

beloved  by  his  troops,  continually  frustrated  Lincoln  with  his  reluctance  to  advance,  and  

when  McClellan  failed  to  pursue  Robert  E.  Lee’s  retreating  Confederate  Army  in  the  

aftermath  of  the  Union  victory  at  Antietam  in  September  1862,  Lincoln  removed  him  from  

command.  During  the  war,  Lincoln  drew  criticism  for  suspending  some  civil  liberties,  

including  the  right  of  habeas  corpus,  but  he  considered  such  measures  necessary  to  win  the  

war.      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 25: The Missouri Compromise · The Missouri Compromise In#the#years#leading#up#to#the#Missouri#Compromise#of#1820,tensions#began#to#rise#between# pro=slavery#and#anti=slavery#factions#within#the#U.S.Congress#and#across#the#country.They#

FORT SUMTER  

Fort  Sumter  is  an  island  fortification  located  in  Charleston  Harbor,  South  Carolina.  Originally  

constructed  in  1829  as  a  coastal  garrison,  Fort  Sumter  is  most  famous  for  being  the  site  of  

the  first  shots  of  the  Civil  War  (1861-­‐65).  U.S.  Major  Robert  Anderson  occupied  the  

unfinished  fort  in  December  1860  following  South  Carolina’s  secession  from  the  Union,  

initiating  a  standoff  with  the  state’s  militia  forces.  When  President  Abraham  Lincoln  

announced  plans  to  resupply  the  fort,  Confederate  General  P.G.T.  Beauregard  bombarded  

Fort  Sumter  on  April  12,  1861.  After  a  34-­‐hour  exchange  of  artillery  fire,  Anderson  and  86  

soldiers  surrendered  the  fort  on  April  13.  Confederate  troops  then  occupied  Fort  Sumter  for  

nearly  four  years,  resisting  several  bombardments  by  Union  forces  before  abandoning  the  

garrison  prior  to  William  T.  Sherman’s  capture  of  Charleston  in  February  1865.  After  the  Civil  

War,  Fort  Sumter  was  restored  by  the  U.S.  military  and  manned  during  the  Spanish-­‐American  

War  (1898),  World  War  I  (1914-­‐18)  and  World  War  II  (1939-­‐45).  

FORT  SUMTER:  CONSTRUCTION  AND  DESIGN  

Fort  Sumter  was  first  built  in  the  wake  of  the  War  of  1812  (1812-­‐1815),  which  had  highlighted  

the  United  States’  lack  of  strong  coastal  defenses.  Named  for  Revolutionary  War  general  

and  South  Carolina  native  Thomas  Sumter,  Fort  Sumter  was  one  of  nearly  50  forts  built  as  

part  of  the  so-­‐called  Third  System,  a  coastal  defense  program  implemented  by  Congress  in  

1817.  The  three-­‐tiered,  five-­‐sided  fort’s  coastal  placement  was  designed  to  allow  it  to  control  

access  to  the  vital  Charleston  Harbor.  While  the  island  itself  was  only  2.4  acres  in  size,  the  

fort  was  built  to  accommodate  a  garrison  of  650  soldiers  and  135  artillery  pieces.    DID  YOU  KNOW?  

There  were  no  casualties  during  the  Confederate  bombardment  of  Fort  Sumter  at  the  start  

of  the  American  Civil  War.  The  only  Union  deaths  came  during  the  evacuation:  One  soldier  

was  killed  and  another  mortally  wounded  in  an  accidental  explosion  during  a  planned  100-­‐

gun  salute.  

Construction  of  Fort  Sumter  first  began  in  1829  in  Charleston  Harbor,  South  Carolina,  on  a  

manmade  island  built  from  thousands  of  tons  of  granite.  Building  ground  to  a  halt  in  the  

Page 26: The Missouri Compromise · The Missouri Compromise In#the#years#leading#up#to#the#Missouri#Compromise#of#1820,tensions#began#to#rise#between# pro=slavery#and#anti=slavery#factions#within#the#U.S.Congress#and#across#the#country.They#

1830s  amid  a  dispute  over  ownership  of  the  stretch  of  the  harbor,  and  did  not  resume  until  

1841.  Like  many  Third  System  fortifications,  Fort  Sumter  proved  a  costly  endeavor,  and  

construction  slowed  again  in  1859  due  to  lack  of  funding.  By  1860  the  island  and  the  outer  

fortifications  were  complete,  but  the  fort’s  interior  and  armaments  remained  unfinished.  

FORT  SUMTER:  THE  FIRST  BATTLE  OF  FORT  SUMTER  

Construction  of  Fort  Sumter  was  still  underway  when  South  Carolina  seceded  from  the  

Union  on  December  20,  1860.  Despite  Charleston’s  position  as  a  major  port,  at  the  time  only  

two  companies  of  federal  troops  guarded  the  harbor.  Commanded  by  Major  Robert  

Anderson  (1805-­‐1871),  these  companies  were  stationed  at  Fort  Moultrie,  a  dilapidated  

fortification  facing  the  coastline.  Recognizing  that  Fort  Moultrie  was  vulnerable  to  a  land  

assault,  Anderson  elected  to  abandon  it  for  the  more  easily  defensible  Fort  Sumter  on  

December  26,  1860.  South  Carolina  militia  forces  would  seize  the  city’s  other  forts  shortly  

thereafter,  leaving  Fort  Sumter  as  the  lone  federal  outpost  in  Charleston.  

A  standoff  ensued  until  January  9,  1861,  when  a  ship  called  the  Star  of  the  West  arrived  in  

Charleston  with  over  200  U.S.  troops  and  supplies  intended  for  Fort  Sumter.  South  Carolina  

militia  batteries  fired  upon  the  vessel  as  it  neared  Charleston  Harbor,  forcing  it  to  turn  back  

to  sea.  Major  Anderson  refused  repeated  calls  to  abandon  Fort  Sumter,  and  by  March  1861  

there  were  over  3,000  militia  troops  besieging  his  garrison.  A  number  of  other  U.S.  military  

facilities  in  the  Deep  South  had  already  been  seized,  and  Fort  Sumter  was  viewed  by  many  as  

one  of  the  South’s  few  remaining  hurdles  to  overcome  before  achieving  sovereignty.  

With  the  inauguration  of  President  Abraham  Lincoln  (1809-­‐1865)  in  March  1861,  the  situation  

soon  escalated.  Knowing  that  Anderson  and  his  men  were  running  out  of  supplies,  Lincoln  

announced  his  intention  to  send  three  unarmed  ships  to  relieve  Fort  Sumter.  Having  already  

declared  that  any  attempt  to  resupply  the  fort  would  be  seen  as  an  act  of  aggression,  South  

Carolina  militia  forces  soon  scrambled  to  respond.  On  April  11,  militia  commander  P.G.T.  

Beauregard  (1818-­‐1893)  demanded  that  Anderson  surrender  the  fort,  but  Anderson  again  

refused.  In  response  Beauregard  opened  fire  on  Fort  Sumter  shortly  after  4:30  a.m.  on  April  

12,  1861.  U.S.  Captain  Abner  Doubleday  (1819-­‐1893)—later  famous  for  the  myth  that  he  

invented  baseball—ordered  the  first  shots  in  defense  of  the  fort  a  few  hours  later.  

Page 27: The Missouri Compromise · The Missouri Compromise In#the#years#leading#up#to#the#Missouri#Compromise#of#1820,tensions#began#to#rise#between# pro=slavery#and#anti=slavery#factions#within#the#U.S.Congress#and#across#the#country.They#

Beauregard’s  19  coastal  batteries  unleashed  a  punishing  barrage  on  Fort  Sumter,  eventually  

firing  an  estimated  3,000  shots  at  the  citadel  in  34  hours.  By  Saturday,  April  13,  cannon  fire  

had  broken  through  the  fortress’s  five-­‐foot-­‐thick  brick  walls,  causing  fires  inside  the  post.  

With  his  stores  of  ammunition  depleted,  Anderson  was  forced  to  surrender  the  fort  shortly  

after  2  p.m.  in  the  afternoon.  No  Union  troops  had  been  killed  during  the  bombardment,  but  

two  men  died  the  following  day  in  an  explosion  that  occurred  during  an  artillery  salute  held  

before  the  U.S.  evacuation.  The  bombardment  of  Fort  Sumter  would  play  a  major  part  in  

triggering  the  Civil  War.  In  the  days  following  the  assault,  Lincoln  issued  a  call  for  Union  

volunteers  to  quash  the  rebellion,  while  more  Southern  states  including  Virginia,  North  

Carolina  and  Tennessee  cast  their  lot  with  the  Confederacy.    FORT  SUMTER:  LATER  CIVIL  WAR  ENGAGEMENTS  

Following  Beauregard’s  bombardment  in  1861,  Confederate  forces  occupied  Fort  Sumter  

and  used  it  to  marshal  a  defense  of  Charleston  Harbor.  Once  it  was  completed  and  better  

armed,  Fort  Sumter  allowed  the  Confederates  to  create  a  valuable  hole  in  the  Union  

blockade  of  the  Atlantic  seaboard.  

The  first  Union  assault  on  Fort  Sumter  came  in  April  1863,  when  Rear  Admiral  Samuel  Francis  

Du  Pont  (1803-­‐1865)  attempted  a  naval  attack  on  Charleston.  Commander  of  the  South  

Atlantic  Blockading  Squadron,  Du  Pont  arrived  in  Charleston  with  a  fleet  of  nine  ironclad  

warships,  seven  of  which  were  updated  versions  of  the  famed  USS  Monitor.  

While  Du  Pont  had  hoped  to  recapture  Fort  Sumter—by  then  a  symbol  of  the  Confederate  

rebellion—his  attack  was  poorly  coordinated  and  met  with  unfavorable  weather  conditions.  

In  collaboration  with  Fort  Sumter,  Confederate  batteries  commanded  by  P.G.T.  Beauregard  

hammered  the  ironclad  fleet  with  artillery  fire,  and  underwater  mines  posed  a  constant  

threat  to  the  ships’  hulls.  Outgunned  and  unable  to  properly  maneuver  in  heavy  currents,  Du  

Pont’s  fleet  eventually  withdrew  from  the  harbor  after  taking  over  500  hits  by  Confederate  

guns.  Only  one  Union  soldier  was  killed  during  the  battle,  but  one  of  the  ironclads,  the  

Keokuk,  sank  the  next  day.  Five  Confederates  were  killed  during  the  attack,  but  the  damage  

to  Fort  Sumter  was  soon  repaired  and  its  defenses  improved.  Confederate  soldiers  even  

managed  to  salvage  one  of  the  Keokuk’s  11-­‐inch  Dahlgren  guns  and  mount  it  on  the  fortress.  

Page 28: The Missouri Compromise · The Missouri Compromise In#the#years#leading#up#to#the#Missouri#Compromise#of#1820,tensions#began#to#rise#between# pro=slavery#and#anti=slavery#factions#within#the#U.S.Congress#and#across#the#country.They#

In  July  1863  Union  troops  laid  siege  to  Fort  Wagner,  a  valuable  post  on  Morris  Island  near  the  

mouth  of  Charleston  Harbor.  After  being  met  with  heavy  fire  from  Fort  Sumter,  Union  

General  Quincy  Adams  Gillmore  (1825-­‐1888)  turned  his  guns  on  the  fort  and  unleashed  a  

devastating  seven-­‐day  bombardment.  On  September  8  a  force  of  nearly  400  Union  troops  

attempted  to  land  at  Fort  Sumter  and  capture  the  post  by  force.  Union  Rear  Admiral  John  

Dahlgren  (1809-­‐1870)  mistakenly  believed  the  fort  was  manned  by  a  skeleton  crew,  but  the  

landing  party  was  met  by  over  300  Confederate  infantry,  who  easily  repulsed  the  assault.  

Following  the  failed  infantry  attack,  Union  forces  on  Morris  Island  recommenced  their  

bombing  campaign  on  Fort  Sumter.  Over  the  next  15  months,  Union  artillery  effectively  

leveled  Fort  Sumter,  eventually  firing  nearly  50,000  projectiles  at  the  fort  between  

September  1863  and  February  1865.  Despite  suffering  over  300  casualties  from  the  Union  

bombardments,  the  beleaguered  Confederate  garrison  managed  to  retain  control  of  the  fort  

until  February  1865.  Only  when  Union  General  William  T.  Sherman  was  poised  to  capture  

Charleston  did  the  Confederates  finally  evacuate.  Union  forces  would  reclaim  Fort  Sumter  

on  February  22,  1865.  Robert  A.  Anderson  and  Abner  Doubleday,  the  two  commanding  

officers  from  the  original  siege  of  Fort  Sumter,  would  both  return  to  the  fortress  on  April  14,  

1865,  for  a  flag  raising  ceremony.  

FORT  SUMTER:  POST-­‐CIVIL  WAR  USE  

After  the  Civil  War  the  derelict  Fort  Sumter  was  rebuilt  and  partially  redesigned.  It  would  see  

little  use  during  the  1870s  and  1880s  and  was  eventually  reduced  to  serving  as  a  lighthouse  

station  for  Charleston  Harbor.  With  the  start  of  the  Spanish-­‐American  War  (1898),  the  

fortress  was  rearmed  and  once  again  used  as  a  coastal  defense  installation.  It  would  later  

see  service  during  both  World  War  I  (1914-­‐18)  and  World  War  II  (1939-­‐45).  In  1948  Fort  

Sumter  was  decommissioned  as  a  military  post  and  turned  over  to  the  National  Park  Service.  

It  now  attracts  over  750,000  visitors  every  year.