the modular modeling system (mms) tools for the development, application, and analysis of hydrologic...
TRANSCRIPT
THE MODULAR MODELING SYSTEM (MMS)
Tools for the development, application, and analysis of
hydrologic and ecosystem models
MODELING ISSUES
• Increasing complexity of problems
• Increasing need for multidisciplinary approaches
• Continued advances in science and computer technology
• New data resources
• No universal models
STARTING POINTS
• There are no universal models
• Models for different purposes require different levels of detail and comprehensiveness
• Appropriate model process conceptualizations are a function of problem objectives, data constraints, and spatial and temporal scales of application
Modeling Conundrum
• Experimental science builds on hypothesis testing and interpretation based on earlier published hypotheses and results
• Modelers tend to build from the ground up because existing models are not well designed for incremental improvement by others
TOOL BOX MODELING VIEWS
• Research Model Developer Complex Detail
• Application Model Developer
• Model User
• Resource Manager
• Policy Maker Condensed Analysis
LEVELS OF MODULAR DESIGN
• PROCESS
• MODEL
• FULLY COUPLED MODELS
• LOOSELY COUPLED MODELS
• RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS
• ANALYSIS AND SUPPORT TOOLS
Single Purpose
Multi-objective, Complex
LEVELS OF MODULAR DESIGN
• PROCESS
• MODEL
• FULLY COUPLED MODELS
• LOOSELY COUPLED MODELS
• RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS
• ANALYSIS AND SUPPORT TOOLS
CRITERIA AND RULES FOR GOOD MODULE DESIGN
• relate directly to real world components or processes
• have input and output variables that are measurable values
• communicate solely via these input and output variables
Modules should
Reynolds J.F., and Acock, B., 1997, Modularity and genericness in plant and ecosystem models: Ecological Modeling 94, p 7-16
SELECTED MODELS AND MODULES IN MMS
• USGS– PRMS
– DAFLOW
– 1-D Sediment Transport (beta)
– MODFLOW
– WEBMOD
– WETMOD
• OTHER– TOPMODEL
– Hydro-17 (NWS snowmelt)
– Snowmelt Runoff Model (SRM) (ARS)
– ENNS Model (modified HBV, Austria)
• IN DEVELOPMENT– PRMS-MODFLOW-DAFLOW-UnsatZone
– Sacramento Model (NWS)
– PHREEQC, OTIS, OTEQ, AHM (QW models)
– RZWQM, RUSLE, SWAT, Generic Crop (ARS Ag models)
LEVELS OF MODULAR DESIGN
• PROCESS
• MODEL
• FULLY COUPLED MODELS
• LOOSELY COUPLED MODELS
• RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS
• ANALYSIS AND SUPPORT TOOLS
PRMS, MODFLOW, DAFLOW Unsaturated Zone
Streamflow
Unsaturated Zone Model
(Niswonger and Prudic, 2003, WRR)
LEVELS OF MODULAR DESIGN
• PROCESS
• MODEL
• FULLY COUPLED MODELS
• LOOSELY COUPLED MODELS
• RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS
• ANALYSIS AND SUPPORT TOOLS
LOOSELEY COUPLED MODELS
Watershed Model
Hydraulics Model
Database
Fish ModelData Management Interface (DMI)
MMS Model
Off-the-shelf Model
LOOSELEY COUPLED MODELS
Watershed Model
Hydraulics Model
Database
Fish Model
Data Management Interface (DMI)
MMS Model
Off-the-shelf Model
Model Management Interface (MMI) [XML]
LEVELS OF MODULAR DESIGN
• PROCESS
• MODEL
• FULLY COUPLED MODELS
• LOOSELY COUPLED MODELS
• RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS
• ANALYSIS AND SUPPORT TOOLS
Watershed and River Systems Management
Program
Recreation
Municipal & Industrial
Riparian Habitat
Hydropower
Irrigation
Endangered Species
Research and development of decision support systems and their application to achieve an equitable balance among water resource issues.
Upper Gunnison DSS
HydrologicDatabase
Hydromet
Real-time climate data feed
RiverWareReservoir and River System
Operations Model
Object User InterfaceInterface for data visualization
and modeling
Modular Modeling SystemPhysical Process Models
DMI
DMI
DMI
MMI
WARSMP BASINS
YAKIMA
GUNNISONTRUCKEE
RIO GRANDESAN JUAN
SACRAMENTO
SAN JOAQUIN
CURRENTLY OPERATIONAL
CURRENTLY OPERATIONAL
IN DEVELOPMENT
IN DEVELOPMENT, MMS PLUS
WARSMP RELATED
LEVELS OF MODULAR DESIGN
• PROCESS
• MODEL
• FULLY COUPLED MODELS
• LOOSELY COUPLED MODELS
• RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS
• ANALYSIS AND SUPPORT TOOLS
ANALYSIS and SUPPORT TOOLS
Currently Available
Statistical and Graphical Analyses
Parameter Optimization
Parameter Sensitivity Analysis
Beta TestingShuffle Complex Evolution Optimization
Multi-Objective COMplex Evolution Algorithm (MOCOM)
Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE)
Visualization
Vegetation Type (USFS)
Vegetation Density (USFS)
Land Use-Land Cover (USGS)
DIGITAL DATABASESDIGITAL DATABASES (1 km2 resolution)
Forecast Methodologies
- Historic data as analog for the future
Point measures (ESP)
Radar data (NEXRAD)
- Synthetic time-series using regional info
- Atmospheric model output
Statistical Downscaling
Dynamical Downscaling
CURRENT FOCUS ISSUES IN MMS DEVELOPMENT AND
APPLICATION
• Coupling of SW and GW Models
• A Priori Parameter Estimation
• Incorporation of Remotely Sensed Data
• Coupling of Atmospheric and Hydrologic Models
• Improved Hydrologic and Ecosystem Process Simulation
• Integrated Analysis and Support Tools
PRMS, MODFLOW, DAFLOW Unsaturated Zone
Streamflow
Unsaturated Zone Model
(Niswonger and Prudic, 2003, WRR)
Sleepers River, Vermont
Trout Lake, Wisconsin
Panola Mountain, Georgia
Luquillo, Puerto Rico
Loch Vale, Colorado
WATER, ENERGY, AND BIOGEOCHEMICAL BUDGETS (WEBB) PROGRAM
USGS
University of Arizona
NASA funded -- Southwest Regional Earth Science Applications Center -- Integration of remotely sensed data
NSF funded -- Sustainability of semi-Arid Hydrology
and Riparian Areas (SAHRA)
UNIVERSITY COLLABORATION
University of Colorado
NOAA funded -- Coupling of hydrologic and atmospheric models to provide short- to long-term forecasts
INTEGRATED SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
Collaborative effort to integrate the Object Modeling System (OMS) and the
Modular Modeling System (MMS)
•US Geological Survey
•Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany
•US Agricultural Research Service (ARS)
•US Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
U.S. MULTI-AGENCY MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
• Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
• Army Corp of Engineers (COE)
• US Geological Survey (USGS)
• National Oceanic and Atmospheric Admin (NOAA)
Facilitates cooperation in R&D of multi-media environmental models, frameworks, and databases for use
in human and environmental health risk assessment Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA)
Department of Energy (DOE)
US Agricultural Research Service (ARS)
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
(http://www.iscmem.org)
MMS International Collaboration
• Public Works Research Institute, Japan
• Korean Water Resources Corp., South Korea
• Chinese Academy of Sciences, Geography and Natural Resources Institute, Beijing
• Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany
• University of Bodenkultur, Vienna, Austria
• International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna
SUMMARY
• Toolbox approach to model and system development
• Supports multi-disciplinary model integration for decision support systems
• Open source software design allows many to share resources, expertise, knowledge, and costs
• Flexible framework approach enables the incorporation of continuing advances in science, databases, and computer technology
Chicken Soup for the Modeling Soul
“A fool with a tool is still a fool.”
System Development magazine
POINT