the morphometric ontogeny of the trilobite calyptaulax jennifer mcdaniel mentor: dr. jesse carlucci

26
The Morphometric Ontogeny of the Trilobite Calyptaulax Jennifer McDaniel Mentor: Dr. Jesse Carlucci

Upload: bethany-hattersley

Post on 01-Apr-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Morphometric Ontogeny of the Trilobite Calyptaulax Jennifer McDaniel Mentor: Dr. Jesse Carlucci

The Morphometric Ontogeny of the Trilobite Calyptaulax

Jennifer McDanielMentor: Dr. Jesse Carlucci

Page 2: The Morphometric Ontogeny of the Trilobite Calyptaulax Jennifer McDaniel Mentor: Dr. Jesse Carlucci

The Morphometric Ontogeny of the Trilobite Calyptaulax

Trilobites are extinct arthropod that make up the class Trilobita. They are the most diverse fossil group of the Paleozoic.

Page 3: The Morphometric Ontogeny of the Trilobite Calyptaulax Jennifer McDaniel Mentor: Dr. Jesse Carlucci

Trilobites could enroll for protection.

Armadillidium vulgare

Page 4: The Morphometric Ontogeny of the Trilobite Calyptaulax Jennifer McDaniel Mentor: Dr. Jesse Carlucci

Trilobites provide us with the earliest record of an advanced invertebrate visual system.

Page 5: The Morphometric Ontogeny of the Trilobite Calyptaulax Jennifer McDaniel Mentor: Dr. Jesse Carlucci
Page 6: The Morphometric Ontogeny of the Trilobite Calyptaulax Jennifer McDaniel Mentor: Dr. Jesse Carlucci

In the Cambrian and Lower Ordovician, trilobites are abundant and their remains are often the primary components of limestones

Our specimens have been silicified, so that only the limestone is dissolved when exposed to Hydrochloric Acid.

CaCO3(s) + 2H+(aq) + [2Cl-

(aq)] --> Ca2+(aq) + CO2(g) + H2O(l) + [2Cl-

(aq)]

Page 7: The Morphometric Ontogeny of the Trilobite Calyptaulax Jennifer McDaniel Mentor: Dr. Jesse Carlucci

The trilobite exoskeleton

Page 8: The Morphometric Ontogeny of the Trilobite Calyptaulax Jennifer McDaniel Mentor: Dr. Jesse Carlucci

What are trilobites and how do they grow? (Ontogeny)

• Protaspid: Disk or globular shape, no true segmentation.

• Meraspid: Adds thoracic segments with each molt.

• Holaspid: Gets larger with each molt, adult number of thoracic segments.

Page 9: The Morphometric Ontogeny of the Trilobite Calyptaulax Jennifer McDaniel Mentor: Dr. Jesse Carlucci

Hypotheses to be tested

• Shape change during the development of the trilobite Calyptaulax is allometric (Adults are not simply scaled up versions of larger ones).

• The transition from meraspid to holaspid stage can be seen in the head and trail and is not just dependent on an adult number of thoracic segments.

Page 10: The Morphometric Ontogeny of the Trilobite Calyptaulax Jennifer McDaniel Mentor: Dr. Jesse Carlucci

Landmark Selection

• Landmarks are a biological coordinate.• Must provide adequate coverage of the form• Can be found reliably across specimens in different

states of preservation.• Consistency of relative position• Coplanarity of landmarks (accounting for

orientation)

Page 11: The Morphometric Ontogeny of the Trilobite Calyptaulax Jennifer McDaniel Mentor: Dr. Jesse Carlucci

Type 1 landmarks are the most useful for defining shape they occur at intersections.Type 2 landmarks are at the end of a line or other feature.Type 3 landmarks are the most unreliable and are only used when they can not be avoided and occur on a curved line.

Page 12: The Morphometric Ontogeny of the Trilobite Calyptaulax Jennifer McDaniel Mentor: Dr. Jesse Carlucci

These landmarks, A,B, and C work as a axis of symmetry allowing to use partial samples as we can flip the

image over the base.

AB

C

Page 13: The Morphometric Ontogeny of the Trilobite Calyptaulax Jennifer McDaniel Mentor: Dr. Jesse Carlucci

These landmarks, A,B, and C also act as a baseline to show the direction of

shape change vectors.

AB

C

Page 14: The Morphometric Ontogeny of the Trilobite Calyptaulax Jennifer McDaniel Mentor: Dr. Jesse Carlucci

Type 2

• The next three land marks are at the inside edge of furrows S1, S2 and S3

Page 15: The Morphometric Ontogeny of the Trilobite Calyptaulax Jennifer McDaniel Mentor: Dr. Jesse Carlucci

Type 1

• The next landmarks are where the same sections (S1 S2 and S3) meet the Axial furrow.

Page 16: The Morphometric Ontogeny of the Trilobite Calyptaulax Jennifer McDaniel Mentor: Dr. Jesse Carlucci

Type 1 • Where the occipital and the axial furrows intersect. Where the axial and the palpebral furrow intersect. Where the palpebral and posterior furrow intersect. At the outside most point of the palpebral furrow.

Page 17: The Morphometric Ontogeny of the Trilobite Calyptaulax Jennifer McDaniel Mentor: Dr. Jesse Carlucci
Page 18: The Morphometric Ontogeny of the Trilobite Calyptaulax Jennifer McDaniel Mentor: Dr. Jesse Carlucci

Scientific Awesome

Page 19: The Morphometric Ontogeny of the Trilobite Calyptaulax Jennifer McDaniel Mentor: Dr. Jesse Carlucci

Raw DataLM=112201.00000 2464.000002182.00000 2180.000002174.00000 551.000001875.00000 1467.000001916.00000 1716.000001927.00000 1934.000001759.00000 2236.000001778.00000 2036.000001684.00000 1873.000001444.00000 1344.000001352.00000 1541.00000CURVES=1POINTS=501259.00000 2266.000001212.00000 2238.000001163.00000 2214.000001113.00000 2191.000001063.00000 2169.000001016.00000 2142.00000978.00000 2103.00000947.00000 2058.00000915.00000 2013.00000895.00000 1964.00000889.00000 1910.00000882.00000 1856.00000889.00000 1801.00000896.00000 1747.00000908.00000 1694.00000928.00000 1643.00000950.00000 1593.00000

1010.00000 1502.000001045.00000 1460.000001082.00000 1419.000001124.00000 1385.000001170.00000 1356.000001220.00000 1333.000001269.00000 1309.000001319.00000 1286.000001371.00000 1284.000001386.00000 1278.000001364.00000 1229.000001358.00000 1175.000001360.00000 1120.000001352.00000 1063.000001368.00000 1014.00000

1404.00000 973.000001444.00000 935.000001486.00000 901.000001529.00000 867.000001573.00000 835.000001621.00000 807.000001664.00000 774.000001710.00000 745.000001757.00000 718.000001806.00000 692.000001858.00000 668.000001903.00000 646.000001950.00000 619.000002000.00000 596.000002048.00000 571.000002097.00000 549.000002152.00000 548.00000

IMAGE=Cran1 34.6 and 0.75cm standard.tifSCALE=0.003447

Landmarks x/y coordinates

Semi-landmark coordinates along a curve.

Scaling Factor

Page 20: The Morphometric Ontogeny of the Trilobite Calyptaulax Jennifer McDaniel Mentor: Dr. Jesse Carlucci

Centroid Size

Centroid size is the square root of the sum of squared distances of a set of landmarks from thier centroid. The centroid is determined by the average of the x,y coordinates.

Page 21: The Morphometric Ontogeny of the Trilobite Calyptaulax Jennifer McDaniel Mentor: Dr. Jesse Carlucci
Page 22: The Morphometric Ontogeny of the Trilobite Calyptaulax Jennifer McDaniel Mentor: Dr. Jesse Carlucci

Future Work

• We are still collecting data, when we are done we need to apply multivariate statistics to the data.

Page 23: The Morphometric Ontogeny of the Trilobite Calyptaulax Jennifer McDaniel Mentor: Dr. Jesse Carlucci

Future Work (Procrustes Superimposition)

These are trilobite landmark coordinates after they have been superimposed: rotated, scaled by centroid size, and moved so that only shape differences remain. The denominator of the formula for the Procrustes distance between two sets of landmark configurations is the product of their Centroid Sizes.

Kim et al. 2002

Page 24: The Morphometric Ontogeny of the Trilobite Calyptaulax Jennifer McDaniel Mentor: Dr. Jesse Carlucci

Testing the hypothesis of merapsid-holaspid shape change

• Procustes Distance = shortest distance along an arc between two landmarks

Kim et al. 2002

Mer

aspid

Holaspid

Page 25: The Morphometric Ontogeny of the Trilobite Calyptaulax Jennifer McDaniel Mentor: Dr. Jesse Carlucci

PCA

• Principle Components Analysis to find out which aspects of shape change explain the most variance as the trilobite grows.

Page 26: The Morphometric Ontogeny of the Trilobite Calyptaulax Jennifer McDaniel Mentor: Dr. Jesse Carlucci

• Thin Plate Spline analysis to show how coordinates deform during different portions of ontogeny and the movement of which coordinates best explains the shape differences.

Webster et al. 2011