the national metal finishers strategic goals program (sgp) formerly the common sense initiative, csi...

23
formerly the Common Sense Initiative, CSI The Strategic Goals Program for Metal Finishers: New Strategies for Success Winston-Salem, N.C. Dec. 12, 2000 Julie Woosley N.C. Division of Pollution Prevention and Environmental Assistance (DPPEA)

Upload: loraine-beasley

Post on 27-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

The National Metal Finishers Strategic Goals Program (SGP)

formerly the Common Sense Initiative, CSI

The Strategic Goals Program

for Metal Finishers: New Strategies for Success

Winston-Salem, N.C. Dec. 12, 2000

Julie Woosley N.C. Division of Pollution Prevention

and Environmental Assistance (DPPEA)

Common Sense Initiative Joint EPA/industry/stakeholders (1993) Industry sector focus Six industry sectors selected Metal Finishing -

Most developed initiative Seeking 80 percent participation by 2002 1998: Strategic Goals Program (SGP)

Federal Categorical Regulation Consistent nationwide Apply to six metal finishing operations

Most Common 1. Electroplating 2. Coating (phosphating, chromating)

Sample for seven metals and CN once per six months Many frustrating aspects MP&M (Metal Products and Machinery) Effluent

Guidelines will change current regulations

Metal Finishing Regulations(40 CFR Part 433)

Strategic Goals ProgramReinvent Environmental Protection- Seeking a more flexible, cost effective and environmentally effective approach to regulations tailored to the needs of both industries and stakeholders.

1. Smarter2. Cheaper 3. Cleaner

Environmental Regulation

Means Municipality signs up as participant Local industries sign up as participants and

commit to series of goals Municipalities offer regulatory flexibility

or other incentives to industries for progress toward goals

State provides supporting role

CSI / SGP Goals

Cleaner Cheaper Smarter

Environmental Performance

“Cleaner” - Reduction in hazardous emissions & exposure

90% reduction in organic TRI emissions 50% reduction in metal releases to air & water 50% reduction in land disposal of hazardous sludges Reduction in human exposure to toxics

(indoor and ambient)

Goals:

“Cheaper” - Increased economic payback and decreased environmental costs

- 50% reduction in cost of unnecessary permitting, reporting and monitoring- Fewer long-term liabilities

- Economic benefit from more efficient (cleaner, smarter) system

Goals:

“Smarter” - Improved resource utilization

98% utilization of metal on product 50% reduction in water purchased (1992) 25% reduction in facility-wide

energy use

Goals:

Benefits of SGP

Industry Operational flexibility Less resource-intensive

regulations Technical assistance Improved public image Opportunity to change

regulatory system

POTW Reduced pollutant

loading Implement more efficient

permitting system Improved relations with

industries Opportunity to change

regulatory system

North Carolina’s Action Plan Outreach

Technical assistance - DPPEACompliance assistance - DPPEAMeet with IU’s - Julie

Positive recognition of participants Pretreatment analysis and support - DWQ Increased enforcement of “rogue” firms –

DWQ / EPA Energy assessment – DPPEA / NCSU Utility bill insert – DPPEA EMS Workshops – EMS and Government

Jan. 31, 2001: 8 a.m. – noon, Gastonia, N.C.

SGP Current Status Statesville

- 13 platers – 6 participating - incentives granted for progress on goals

Raleigh - 10 platers – 6 participating – 4 new!- incentives granted for progress on goals

Charlotte -19 platers – 2 participating- mentoring and public recognition program

Gastonia-? Platers – 2 participating

16 North Carolina participants; 448 total nationwide

Industry Incentives Proposed Reduced monitoring frequency City Reduced metals monitoring City Eliminate metals monitoring EPA Reduced monitoring costs City No Charge BDL City Volume of discharge EPA Phosphaters EPA Reduced enforcement City

Technical/regulatory assistance (DPPEA) State

Public Recognition City/StateMentoring City

Observations to Date

EPA – Limited assistance- On-line Toolbox, Contacts

Emphasis on continual improvement EMS Recruit more metal platers – 80% goal – that’s YOU! Great opportunity for reduced pollutant discharges and

less resource-intensive regulations Improved relationship b/w POTW’s and IU’s Problems identifying incentives to offer – input? Worksheets due! – 1992 baseline is flexible

New Information for SGP Participants: EPA MP&M Guidelines:

Metal Products and Machinery Effluent – due out October 2000

TRI (Toxics Release Inventory) data- nitrates reporting

Energy conservation Calculation/worksheet training Incentive identification and assistance?

Workshop TODAY

TRI Reporting of Nitrates

TRI Reporting of Nitrates The Emergency Planning and Community Right

to Know Act (EPCRA, Title III of SARA, the Superfund Amendments Reauthorization Act, 1986)

Section 313: Release Reporting Requirements, Toxic Chemical Release Inventory Rule, 1988.

Purpose: To inform government officials and the public about releases of toxic chemicals into the environment: air, water and land.

TRI Reporting of Nitrates See EPA publication, 745-R-99-008:

TOXICS RELEASE INVENTORYList of Toxic Chemicals within the Water Dissociable Nitrate Compounds Category and Guidance for Reportingwww.epa.gov/tri

Metal finishers that use nitric acid may be creating nitrates that have to be reported!

Who Must Report SIC Codes 2000-3900 (manufacturing) A facility with 10 or more full-time employees A facility that manufactures, imports, processes

or otherwise uses any of the toxic chemicals listed on the EPCRA section 313 list in amounts greater than the “threshold” quantities

- nitric acid and dissociable nitrate compounds (must report BOTH!)

Thresholds

If a facility manufactures, imports or processes any of the listed toxic chemicals (includes “coincidental manufacture”): - 25,000 pounds/toxic chemical or category over the calendar year

If a facility otherwise uses any of the listed chemicals:- 10,000 pounds/toxic chemical or category over the calendar year

Small Business Compliance Policy Pardon Mechanism for Small Businesses (<100

employees) Allows business to state they were not aware of the

requirement and will now comply. EPA will eliminate or reduce civil penalties if the business:

Discovers the violation voluntarily Discloses the violation fully and in writing to

EPA or state within 21 calendar days Corrects the violation with the shortest

practicable period of time

More TRI Information Reports due July 1 each year Civil penalties up to $27,500 a day EPA Region IV Contact for TRI:

Stacy Bouma, (404) 562-9192 EPCRA Section 313 TRI and contact for Charlotte,

NC TRI Workshop, April 30 – May 1, 2001:Ezequiel Velez, (404) 562-9191

TRI Hotline: 1-800-424-9346TRI Website: http://www.epa.gov/tri

For More P2 or SGP Information: DPPEA offers free onsite SGP assistance P2 resources online for metal finishers:

www.p2pays.org/indsector.htm Online assistance for SGP available at:

http://www.strategicgoals.org/ and

http://www.epa.gov/sustainableindustry/metfin.htm

State SGP Contact:Julie Woosley, N.C. DPPEA

(919) 715-6527

or 800-763-0136

[email protected]