the nature of law
DESCRIPTION
The Nature of Law. Is it natural or divinely given -- or is it human? If human, is it statutory (stated by legislative authority) or is it based in custom or tradition? How should judges define law?. Civil Law Tradition. Law proceeds naturally from stated core principles. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: The Nature of Law](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815b7d550346895dc9796a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Nature of Law
Is it natural or divinely given -- or is it human?
If human, is it statutory (stated by legislative authority) or is it based in custom or tradition?
How should judges define law?
![Page 2: The Nature of Law](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815b7d550346895dc9796a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Civil Law Tradition
Law proceeds naturally from stated core principles.
Law proceeds through deductive reasoning.
Law is based in statutory principles (other than canon law)
![Page 3: The Nature of Law](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815b7d550346895dc9796a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Common Law Tradition
Law derived from variety of sources: natural law, custom, statutes.
Law proceeds through inductive reasoning.
Judges are central figures in defining law and legal principles.
![Page 4: The Nature of Law](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815b7d550346895dc9796a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Legal Model
FactsFind
relevant precedents
Determine relevant
similarities/differences
Apply rule of law from
earlier precedents
DecisionNew Rule of Law
![Page 5: The Nature of Law](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815b7d550346895dc9796a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Mechanical Jurisprudence
Term coined by Roscoe Pound in 1908Judges “mechanically” apply
precedents to the facts of cases without regard to the consequences or consulting own biases.
Assumes principles are self-evident
![Page 6: The Nature of Law](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815b7d550346895dc9796a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Legal Realism
Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. - “The life of the law has not been logic, it has been experience.” (1881)
Legal interpretation reflects judges’ experience and biases.
Law is not self-evident, but is best prediction of judges will decide.
![Page 7: The Nature of Law](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815b7d550346895dc9796a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Sociological Jurisprudence
Roscoe Pound’s preferred alternative
The "taught legal tradition“ of the common-law contains important concepts which judges must apply in ways that reflect changes in society
![Page 8: The Nature of Law](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815b7d550346895dc9796a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Judicial Behavior Model
Glendon Schubert (1959)Sought to explain differences in
judicial decisions by focusing on values and Supreme Court justices.
Uses quantitative models to explain variance at highest, most discretionary level
![Page 9: The Nature of Law](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815b7d550346895dc9796a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Role Theory
J. Woodford Howard (1977)Examines U.S. Courts of Appeal,
discovers that judges view job differently
Larger element for institutional demands and institutional constraints
![Page 10: The Nature of Law](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815b7d550346895dc9796a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Political Model
Attitudes
Judicial Vote
Role Orientations
Institutional Context
![Page 11: The Nature of Law](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815b7d550346895dc9796a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Critical Legal Studies (CLS)Radical approach to lawMaintains that law and politics are
indistinguishable from one another.Most popular among legal historians,
esp. those who trace tandem development of legal and economic institutions, and those engaged in critical race and feminist theory.
![Page 12: The Nature of Law](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815b7d550346895dc9796a/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Myth of Judicial Activism
Transforms policy differences into “neutral” arguments about role of courts
Assumes that law can be made free of politics
Can law ever be free of values?
![Page 13: The Nature of Law](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815b7d550346895dc9796a/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Conflicting Principles
Law vs. PoliticsIndependence v. AccountabilityJudges as ElitesOther ElitesGood times behind us/yet to
come
![Page 14: The Nature of Law](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815b7d550346895dc9796a/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Sandra Day O’Connor
“Elected officials routinely score cheap points by railing against the ‘elitist judges’ who are purported to be out of touch with ordinary citizens and their values … using judges as punching bags presents a grave threat to the independent judiciary.”
![Page 15: The Nature of Law](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815b7d550346895dc9796a/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Tom Parker, Judge, Alabama Supreme Court
“the liberals on the U.S. Supreme Court look down on the pro-family policies, Southern heritage, evangelical Christianity, and other blessings of our great state.”
commenting on Roper v. Simmons – no death penalty for minors
![Page 16: The Nature of Law](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815b7d550346895dc9796a/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Tom Parker, Judge, Alabama Supreme Court
“Courts must recognize that the state is but one of several spheres of government, each with its distinct jurisdiction and limited authority granted by God.”
Dissent in 2005 child custody case
![Page 17: The Nature of Law](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815b7d550346895dc9796a/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Constitutional Interpretation
![Page 18: The Nature of Law](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815b7d550346895dc9796a/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
1. Countermajoritarian Problem
2. Government by Judiciary
Two Major Problems for
Theories of Judging
![Page 19: The Nature of Law](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815b7d550346895dc9796a/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Legal Model
FactsFind
relevant precedents
Determine relevant
similarities/differences
Apply rule of law from
earlier precedents
DecisionNew Rule of Law
![Page 20: The Nature of Law](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815b7d550346895dc9796a/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Political Model
Attitudes
Judicial Vote
Role Orientations
Institutional Context
![Page 21: The Nature of Law](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815b7d550346895dc9796a/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
High Politics: Disagreement over fundamental principlesEssential to constitutional interpretation
Low Politics: PartisanshipAntithetical to Judicial Role
Should Judges Be Political?
![Page 22: The Nature of Law](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815b7d550346895dc9796a/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Constitution is a Partially Democratic Document
Based in norm of popular sovereigntyDeliberately imperfect representationDivided powers/Checks & BalancesEnumerated powers/Broadly statedFederal structure
![Page 23: The Nature of Law](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815b7d550346895dc9796a/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Is An Independent Judiciary Compatible w/ Democracy?
Lifetime tenure creates independence, eliminates accountabilityLifetime much longer than 18th centuryCultural issues create greater tension w/ lack of representation
![Page 24: The Nature of Law](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815b7d550346895dc9796a/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Major Schools of Constitutional Interpretation
Strict Construction (Meese)Original Intent/Understanding (Scalia)Contemporary Ratification
(Brennan/Marshall/Souter)Representation Reinforcement
(John Hart Ely)
![Page 25: The Nature of Law](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815b7d550346895dc9796a/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Strict Construction
Politically appealing/intellectually appallingAssumes Constitution has literal meaning/
“Protestant” vision of interpretationSimplistic vision of languageGreat for easy questions, useless for difficult
questions
![Page 26: The Nature of Law](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815b7d550346895dc9796a/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Original Intent/UnderstandingAuthority derives from authorshipFocuses on meaning when written (Intent)
and ratified (Understanding)Assumes ability to determine original
meaningAssumes that original meaning provides
answers to current questionsBetter at vetoes than positive answers
![Page 27: The Nature of Law](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815b7d550346895dc9796a/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Contemporary RatificationJudges must read texts to reflect current
problems, understandingsOriginal Intent is hubrisJudges’ job is to decide, SC & OI don’t
answer many questionsConstitution’s meaning must reflect history
as unfolding of principles, not frozenWeakness: whose contemporary values?
![Page 28: The Nature of Law](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815b7d550346895dc9796a/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Representation Reinforcement John Hart Ely (former Dean @ Stanford)Judges must ONLY use judicial review to
enable political processesExamples:
free speech/press/petition/assemblyreapportionment anti-discrimination
![Page 29: The Nature of Law](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815b7d550346895dc9796a/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Robert Bork“Grutter and Gratz accepted the
transparent false-hoods of the University of Michigan about the need for racial diversity in the student body to provide a quality education … utterly ignoring the flat prohibition of racial discrimination in the 1964 Civil Rights Act.”
![Page 30: The Nature of Law](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815b7d550346895dc9796a/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Lino Graglia“Virtually every one of the Court’s
rulings of unconstitutionality over the past 50 years – on abortion, capital punishment, criminal procedure, busing for school racial balance, prayer in the schools … discrimination on the basis of sex … have reflected the views of this same elite.”
![Page 31: The Nature of Law](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815b7d550346895dc9796a/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Senator Al Franken
“If you have a credit car, if you watch TV, if you file insurance claims, if you work … then you interact with corporations that are more powerful than you are.”