the netherlands

21
1 The Netherlands Needs based assessment: participation of pupils and parents Noëlle Pameijer, Copenhagen, 2008

Upload: urbana

Post on 16-Jan-2016

16 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

The Netherlands. Needs based assessment: participation of pupils and parents Noëlle Pameijer, Copenhagen, 2008. NBA: teacher and special needs coordinator. They systematically follow a needs-based cycle, goal-directed, e.g.: 1. Plan for the entire group - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Netherlands

1

The Netherlands

Needs based assessment: participation of pupils and

parentsNoëlle Pameijer, Copenhagen, 2008

Page 2: The Netherlands

2

NBA: teacher and special needs coordinator

They systematically follow a needs-based cycle, goal-directed, e.g.:

1. Plan for the entire group2. Plan for subgroup(s) of students with same

needs3. IEP for several students with specific needsOngoing assessment to evaluate and adjust the

plans, according to the five principles of NBA (a problem solving strategy)

Page 3: The Netherlands

3

Assessment team

‘Special teachers’, coaches, schoolpsychologists, social workers, and others; all work according to the 5 principles of NBA

All involved in and outside the school:- same mission and same language- ongoing cyle of planning and evaluating

Page 4: The Netherlands

4

Principles needs-based assessment …

1. is transparant, operating in accordance with systematic procedures

2. is goal-directed; aims at solving problems & recommendations on learning and teaching

3. uses a transactional frame of reference4. promotes partnership with the teacher,

parents and child5. focuses on positive aspects of child,

teacher, peers, school and parents

Page 5: The Netherlands

5

1. Systematic proceduresAssessment and planning = complex processes Decisions have a large impact on studentTherefore: systematic procedures- Clear stages, step by step - Checklists as a reminder, per stage- Rules to protect against common mistakes,

e.g.:- consider only one possible diagnosis and only find

evidence to confirm - consider only one solution or recommendation - make decisions that some one else should make

(responsibities)

Page 6: The Netherlands

6

Five stages

1. Intake 2. Strategy 3. Diagnosis

4. Needs assessment

5. Recommendations

Page 7: The Netherlands

7

5 stages

1. Intake: questions, requests and expectations? what do teacher, pupil and parents want to achieve?

2. Strategy: what decisions have to be made? what do we already know? what more do we need to know?

3. Diagnosis: participants collect information to answer selected questions

4. Needs assessment: goal of plan: what do pupil, teacher and parents need to achieve goal?

5. Recommendations: a desirable educational plan: is this achievable for this pupil, this teacher, these parents?

Page 8: The Netherlands

8

Transparant procedures

It is clear how the special needs coordinator and schoolpsychologist work and why: Stages are clear (no mystification) Teacher, student and parents actively

participate in each stage They can follow the process with checklists Information is written down and all involved

have a copy (no misunderstandings)

Page 9: The Netherlands

9

2. Goal-directed recommendations

Goal = to answer questions and solve problems. Often too much irrelevant data collected, therefore:

- What exactly is the question?- How can we best answer this question?- What do we really need to know and

why?- If we know that …, then we can

recommend … (plan).

Page 10: The Netherlands

10

Goal = recommendation accepted by teacher & student

What does teacher want to achieve? What does student want to achieve? What do parents want to achieve? Which explanations and solutions do they

have themselves? Recommendation: do they agree? Decisions

and appointments Flexible application of stages: range 2 – 20

hours!

Page 11: The Netherlands

11

3. Transactional frame of reference

Ecological assessment (social-constructive model)

Not only ‘this student’, but: “this student in this school, this classroom, with this teacher and these parents”

Goodness of fit between student’s needs – the learning environment: Risk factors (problems)? Protective factors (strengths)?

Page 12: The Netherlands

12

Implications: child’s needs are central theme

Interactions are crucial: teacher – student compatibility

Not only assessing the child (avoiding labels), but especially assessing the quality of the learning environment and – if neccessary – the parenting situation

Not only testing the child in a separate room, but also observations in the classroom: classroomactivities, teaching practices, such as: organisation, instruction, feedback, behaviour-rules

Page 13: The Netherlands

13

Realistic goal: what does this student need to aquire goal?

“Teacher – classroom - language”: this student needs (help sentences):

Tasks, material or activities that are … Instruction that focusses on … Feedback that stresses … Classmates that … A teacher who … Parents that …. Extra support for ….

Page 14: The Netherlands

14

4. Partnership with teacher, student and parents: together

Goal of assessment is to answer the questions of teacher, student, parents and to make decisions in the benefit of the child

Teacher = educational expert Student = owner of learning process Parents = hands on experts Assessor benefits from their knowledge They can function as co-assessors

Page 15: The Netherlands

15

Partnership school, parents and pupil: communication

Training for special needs coordinators and teachers: Communicating with parents, according to principles of NBA very succesfull!

1. All parents are welcome in our school: we need their information and suggestions as how to teach their child

2. Children have great solutions themselves3. This is how we work (steps) and what we

expect and value: what is your idea? Do we agree?

Page 16: The Netherlands

16

Partnership school, parents and pupils

4. The goal of our meeting is …. We hope to achieve … Together we share the same goal: the benefit your child; our pupil

5. Children usually behave differently at home and in school

6. There are difficulties and also strenghts7. Agreements are written down, copied and

taken home8. Evaluation: are the goals achieved?

Ongoing assessment

Page 17: The Netherlands

17

What works?

First appointment new pupil, teacher and coordinator: What are the problems and the positive aspects? What do parents and pupil expect from school? Which are the goals for learning, working-attitude

and behaviour? Do parents agree? Do parents have suggestions for the teacher as

how to achieve these goals? Agreements between school, parents and pupil

Page 18: The Netherlands

18

Student’s own plans: also very succesfull!

I can already …In … weeks I want to be able to …

I will ….

My teacher can help me by ….

My parents can help me by …

Peers can help me by …

Page 19: The Netherlands

19

5. Positive aspects: strenghts

Child: capacities, interests, intelligence, social skills, creativity, sports, drawing

Instructional environment: good teaching skills, e.g. differentiated instruction, extra help well organised, extra time for practice, effective motivation techniques

Classroom & peers: acceptance, social climate

School: good teaching methods, good communication with parents

Parents: stimulate and support their child

Page 20: The Netherlands

20

Function of positive aspects

They improve communication school – student – parents

Enhance feelings of competence and motivation, give hope

Shed light on diagnosis What does work well? This can be

elaborated in educational plans Enhance the chance of succesfull

mainstreaming (committee decions for SE with and without positive aspects)

Page 21: The Netherlands

21

The pedagogical note and NBA

The note is consistent with all 5 principles! systematic steps and tools goal defining and evaluation Focus on classroom activities Participation of students and their parents Strengths are used

Suggestions: Apply Research data on “what works in schools?” Use helping phrases teacher – language Intervention in or small group in the classroom Lay – out: difference between weakness (-) and strengths

(+) goals Consider a ‘short-list’ (1 page) and if needed a ‘longer

version’