the new overtime regulations under the fair labor standards act september 30, 2004 david b. ritter...

84
The New Overtime Regulations The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Under The Fair Labor Standards Act Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street Chicago, IL 60602 (312) 269-8444 [email protected]

Upload: garry-thompson

Post on 25-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

The New Overtime Regulations The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Under The Fair Labor Standards

ActActSeptember 30, 2004

David B. RitterNeal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP

2 North LaSalle StreetChicago, IL 60602(312) 269-8444

[email protected]

Page 2: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Today’s AgendaToday’s Agenda

•Overview

•Why New Regulations?

•What Is the Status of These Regulations?

•What Is The Impact?

•What Has Changed?

•What Do We Do Now?

Page 3: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Overview: FLSAOverview: FLSA

• FLSA was enacted in 1938

• FLSA governs minimum wage and overtime obligations of covered employers

• Current Federal Minimum Wage: $5:15/hrNote: IL Min. Wage is $5.50/hr as of January 1, 2004Increases to $6.50/hour as of January 1, 2005Be aware of other state and local minimum wage laws and “living wage” ordinances

• Overtime for all hours worked in excess of 40 in a work week, at time and one-half

Note: Different overtime rules in many states

Page 4: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Why New Regulations?Why New Regulations?

•Outdated – No substantial changes since 1938

•Reduce costly and lengthy litigation

•Clear rules that are easier to understand and enforce

Page 5: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

What Is The Status? What Is The Status?

•Effective Date: August 23, 2004, unless Congress takes action

•Congressional Review Act60 days to block the regulations from being implemented (by July 23, 2004)

Page 6: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

What Is The Status? What Is The Status? (Cont.)(Cont.)

•Note state legislative activity

• Illustration: Illinois Minimum Wage Act amended (on April 2, 2004) to effectively maintain overtime eligibility for employees who are entitled to overtime under the old FLSA regulations (except adopting new salary test)

Page 7: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

What Is The Status? What Is The Status? (Cont.)(Cont.)• Pending Congressional Amendments – Legislative

action to severely limit application of new regulations

Added ninety-nine specific categories of jobs that cannot qualify for a white collar exemption Nullify any provisions of the new regulations that would deprive any worker of the right to overtime if that worker would be so entitled under the current regulationsStatus is somewhat in a state of flux

Page 8: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

What Is The Status? What Is The Status? (Cont.)(Cont.)• At least 18 state laws must be considered before

overtime exemption determinations can be made• They are Alaska, Arkansas, California, Colorado,

Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Kentucky, Maryland, Minnesota, Montana, New Jersey, North Dakota, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Washington, West Virginia, and Wisconsin

• Note that FLSA requires employers to abide by more favorable state laws, but if new FLSA regulations result in previously exempt employee becoming non-exempt, the new regulations will apply in Illinois. Creates two sets of laws which must be juggled back and forth to make proper determinations

• Watch state law developments carefully

Page 9: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

What Is The Impact?What Is The Impact?

•Estimated that 1.3 million currently exempt white collar salaried workers will gain OT protection

•107,000 workers who earn more than $100,000 per year could lose OT protection from highly compensated test

•Estimated costs to employers: $738.5 million, related to reviewing the regulations and revising OT policies, and conducting job reviews

Page 10: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

What Is The Impact? What Is The Impact? (Cont.)(Cont.)

•$375 million more per year paid in OT

•Reduce HR and legal costs for classifying workers

Page 11: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

What Has Changed?What Has Changed?The “White Collar” ExemptionsThe “White Collar” Exemptions

•The FLSA provides an exemption from both minimum wage and overtime pay for employees who are employed as:

Executive;Administrative;Professional; orOutside Sales capacity

Page 12: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Three Basic Tests for All Three Basic Tests for All ExemptionsExemptions

•Salary Level Test

•Salary Basis Test

• Job Duties Test

Page 13: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Salary Level Test: $455/wkSalary Level Test: $455/wk (or $23,660/year) (or $23,660/year)

•OT is required if salary is less that this amount

Page 14: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Highly Compensated TestHighly Compensated Test

•This is something new

•Total annual compensation of at least $100,000

•At least $455 per week

•Performance of office or non-manual work

•Customary and regular performance of any one or more of the exempt duties identified in the standard tests for the executive, administrative or professional exemptions

•No overtime if meet this test

Page 15: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Highly Compensated Test Highly Compensated Test (Cont.)(Cont.)

•Total annual compensation includes:CommissionsNondiscretionary bonusesOther nondiscretionary compensation earned during a 52-week period

Page 16: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Highly Compensated Test Highly Compensated Test (Cont.)(Cont.)

• If an employee’s total annual compensation does not equal $100,000 by the end of the year:

The employer may, within one month after the end of the year, make one final bridge payment to reach the $100,000 level; or

Example 1: Employee earns $80,000 base salary, and employer expects employee to make $20,000 in commissions. Due to poor sales, employee only makes $10,000 in commissions

Employer may, within one month after the end of the year, make a $10,000 payment to the employee to preserve the exemption

Page 17: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Highly Compensated Test Highly Compensated Test (Cont.)(Cont.)

•The $100,000 may be pro-rated for employees who do not work the full year

•The employer may use any 52-week period as the year (i.e., calendar, fiscal, anniversary)

Page 18: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Highly Compensated Test (Cont.) Highly Compensated Test (Cont.) Only Office or Non-manual WorkOnly Office or Non-manual Work

•Highly compensated test not available forNon-management production line workersNon-management employees in maintenance, construction and similar occupations such as carpenters, electricians, mechanics, plumbers, iron workers, craftsmen, operating engineers, longshoremen, construction workers and laborers Other employees who perform work involving repetitive operations with their hands, physical skill and energyList could be expanded by pending Congressional amendments

Page 19: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Highly Compensated Test (Cont.) Highly Compensated Test (Cont.) Must Customarily and Regularly Must Customarily and Regularly Perform at Least One Exempt DutyPerform at Least One Exempt Duty

•Frequency must be “greater than occasional” but which may be “less than constant”

• Includes work normally and recurrently performed every workweek

•Does not include isolated or one-time tasks

Page 20: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Salary Basis TestSalary Basis Test

Page 21: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Salary Basis TestSalary Basis Test

•Regularly receives a predetermined amount of compensation each set pay period

•The compensation cannot be reduced because of variations in the quality or quantity of the work performed

•General Rule --Must be paid the full salary for any week in which the employee performs any work

•Need not be paid for any workweek when no work is performed

Page 22: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Salary Basis Test (Cont.)Salary Basis Test (Cont.)Deductions From SalaryDeductions From Salary

•No deduction for absences occasioned by the employer or by the operating requirements of the businesses

• If the employee is ready, willing and able to work, deductions may not be made for time when work is not available

Page 23: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Salary Basis Test (Cont.)Salary Basis Test (Cont.)Permitted Salary DeductionsPermitted Salary Deductions

• Seven exceptions from the “no pay-docking” rule:1. Absence from work for one or more full days

for personal reasons, other than sickness or disability

Example: If an employee is absent for one and one-half days for personal reasons, the employer can deduct only for the full-day absence

Page 24: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Salary Basis Test (Cont.)Salary Basis Test (Cont.)Permitted Salary DeductionsPermitted Salary Deductions

2. Absence from work for one or more full days due to sickness or disability if deductions made under a bona fide plan, policy or practice of providing wage replacement benefits for these types of absences

Example: If an employer has a short-term disability plan providing salary replacement for 12 weeks starting on the fourth day of absence, the employer may make deductions from pay for the three days of absence before the employee qualifies for benefits under the plan

Page 25: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Salary Basis Test (Cont.)Salary Basis Test (Cont.)Permitted Salary DeductionsPermitted Salary Deductions

3. To offset any amounts received as payment for jury fees, witness fees, or military pay

4. Penalties imposed in good faith for violating safety rules of “major significance”

5. Unpaid disciplinary suspension of one or more full days imposed in good faith for violations of workplace conduct rules (must be pursuant to written policy)

Page 26: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Salary Basis Test (Cont.)Salary Basis Test (Cont.)Permitted Salary DeductionsPermitted Salary Deductions

6. Proportionate part of an employee’s full salary may be paid for time actually worked in the first and last weeks of employment

7. Unpaid leave taken pursuant to the Family and Medical Leave Act

Page 27: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Salary Basis Test (Cont.)Salary Basis Test (Cont.)Effect of Improper Effect of Improper DeductionsDeductions

•An actual practice of making improper deductions from salary will result in the loss of the exemption:

During the time period in which improper deductions were madeFor employees in the same job classificationsWorking for the same managers responsible for the actual improper deductions

Page 28: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Salary Basis Test (Cont.)Salary Basis Test (Cont.)Actual Practice of Improper Actual Practice of Improper DeductionsDeductions•Factors to determine whether an actual

practice exists:The number of improper deductions, particularly as compared to the number of employee infractions warranting disciplineThe time period during which the employer made improper deductionsThe number and geographic location of both the employees whose salaries were improperly reduced and the managers responsibleWhether the employer has a clearly communicated policy permitting or prohibiting improper deductions

Page 29: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Salary Basis Test (Cont.)Salary Basis Test (Cont.)Effect of Improper DeductionsEffect of Improper Deductions

Enterprise

Manager A Manager B

Engineer C Engineer DEngineer A Engineer B Chemist

• Manager A has docked the pay of Engineer A on each of 12 days when Engineer A arrived late for work during the last 3 months

Answer: The Exemption could be lost for Engineer A and Engineer B during that 3 months, but could not be lost for the Chemist or Engineers C and D

Page 30: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Salary Basis Test (Cont.)Salary Basis Test (Cont.)The Safe HarborThe Safe Harbor

•The exemption will not be lost if the employer:

Has a clearly communicated policy prohibiting improper deductions, which includes a complaint mechanism; Reimburses employees for any improper deductions; andMakes a good faith commitment to comply in the future

Page 31: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Salary Basis Test (Cont.)Salary Basis Test (Cont.)The Safe HarborThe Safe Harbor

•Safe Harbor Exception: Where the employer willfully violates the policy by continuing to make improper deductions after receiving employee complaints

•Make sure you have a written policy in place by August 23, 2004, to take advantage of the Safe Harbor if Necessary

Page 32: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Salary Basis Test (Cont.)Salary Basis Test (Cont.)Clearly Communicated PolicyClearly Communicated Policy

•Policy should be written and distributed to employees prior to the improper pay deductions by:

Providing a copy of the policy to employees at the time of hire; orPublishing the policy in an employee handbook; orPublishing the policy on the employer’s Intranet site

Page 33: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Salary Basis Test (Cont.)Salary Basis Test (Cont.)Hypotheticals:Hypotheticals:

•Deduction for a partial-day absence to attend a parent-teach conference?

•Deduction of a day of pay because the employer was closed due to inclement weather?

•Deduction of three days of pay because the employee was absent from work for jury duty?

•Deduction for a two day absence due to a minor illness?

Page 34: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Salary Basis Test (Cont.)Salary Basis Test (Cont.)Hypotheticals (Cont.)Hypotheticals (Cont.)

•Deduction for a two day absence due to a minor illness from an employee’s accrued leave account?

•Requiring exempt employees to keep track of and record their hours worked?

•Requiring exempt employees to work a specific schedule?

• Implementing bona fide, across-the-board schedule changes?

Page 35: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Job Duties Test:Job Duties Test:Executive ExemptionExecutive Exemption

Page 36: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Executive Exemption: New Executive Exemption: New TestTest

• Whose primary duty consists of the management of the enterprise in which he is employed or of a customarily recognized department or subdivision

• Who customarily and regularly directs the work of two or more other employees

• Who has the authority to hire or fire other employees or whose suggestions and recommendations as to the hiring, firing, advancement, promotion or any other change of status of other employees are given particular weight

Page 37: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Executive Exemption (Cont.) Executive Exemption (Cont.) Breakdown of Executive Breakdown of Executive DutiesDuties

• Primary duty is management of the enterprise or of a customarily recognized department or subdivision;

• Customarily and regularly directs the work of two or more other employees; and

• Authority to hire or fire other employees or whose suggestions and recommendations as to hiring, firing, advancement, promotion or other change of status of other employees are given particular weight

Key Defined Terms:

Page 38: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Executive Exemption (Cont.) Executive Exemption (Cont.) “Primary Duty”“Primary Duty”

•The principal, main, major or most important duty that the employee performs

•Factors to consider include, but are not limited to:

Relative importance of the exempt duties;Amount of time spent performing exempt work;Relative freedom from direct supervision; andRelationship between the employee’s salary and the wages paid to other employees for the same kind of nonexempt work

Page 39: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Executive Exemption (Cont.) Executive Exemption (Cont.) “Primary Duty” (Cont.)“Primary Duty” (Cont.)

•Employees who spend more than 50% of their time performing exempt work will generally satisfy the primary duty requirement

•However, the regulations do not require that exempt employees spend more than 50% of time performing exempt work, i.e., time is not determinative

Page 40: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Executive Exemption (Cont.) Executive Exemption (Cont.) “Management”“Management”

• Interviewing, selecting, and training employees•Setting and adjusting pay and work hours•Maintaining production or sales records•Appraising employee productivity and efficiency•Handling employee complaints and grievances•Disciplining employees•Planning and apportioning work among

employees

Includes, but is not limited to:

Page 41: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Executive Exemption (Cont.) Executive Exemption (Cont.) “Management” (Cont.)“Management” (Cont.)

•Determining the techniques to be used; the type of materials, supplies, machinery, equipment or tools to be used; or the merchandise to be bought, stocked and sold

•Providing for the safety and security of employees or property

•Planning and controlling the budget

•Monitoring or implementing legal compliance measures

Page 42: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Executive Exemption (Cont.) Executive Exemption (Cont.) “Department or Subdivision”“Department or Subdivision”

•A “customarily recognized department or subdivision” must have a permanent status and continuing function

Page 43: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Executive Exemption (Cont.) Executive Exemption (Cont.) “Department or Subdivision” “Department or Subdivision” (Cont.)(Cont.)

•Examples of customarily recognized departments or subdivisions include:

Human Resources

Compensation Benefits

Recruitment Training

EEO Labor Relations

Sales

New YorkRegion

ChicagoRegion

BostonDistrict

AtlantaDistrict

St. LouisDistrict

ClevelandDistrict

Page 44: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Executive Exemption (Cont.) Executive Exemption (Cont.) “Customarily and Regularly”“Customarily and Regularly”

•Greater than occasional but less than constant

• Includes work normally and recurrently performed every workweek

•Does not include isolated or one-time tasks

Page 45: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Executive Exemption (Cont.) Executive Exemption (Cont.) “Two or More Employees”“Two or More Employees”

•Two full-time employees or the equivalent

•Full-time generally means 40 hours per week

•The supervision of the same employees can be distributed among two or more exempt executives, but the hours worked by an employee cannot be credited more than once

Page 46: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Executive Exemption Executive Exemption (Cont.) Illustration: “Two (Cont.) Illustration: “Two or More”or More”

Assistant Manager - No

Assistant Manager - Yes

Full-timeEmployee

Half-timeEmployee

General Manager -YES

Assistant Manager - Yes

Half-timeEmployee

Full-timeEmployee

Half-timeEmployee

Half-timeEmployee

Half-timeEmployee

Half-timeEmployee

Half-timeEmployee

Page 47: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Executive Exemption (Cont.) Executive Exemption (Cont.) Staffing Does Not Meet the Staffing Does Not Meet the Illustration: “Two or more”Illustration: “Two or more”

Assistant Manager - Yes

Assistant Manager – No

Full-timeEmployee

Full-timeEmployee

Full-timeEmployee

Full-timeEmployee

Page 48: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Executive Exemption (Cont.) Executive Exemption (Cont.) “Particular Weight”“Particular Weight”

•Factors include, but are not limited to:Whether it is part of the employee’s job duties to make suggestions and recommendationsThe frequency with which suggestions and recommendations are made or requestedThe frequency with which the employee’s suggestions and recommendations are relied upon

Page 49: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Executive Exemption (Cont.) Executive Exemption (Cont.) “Particular Weight” (Cont.)“Particular Weight” (Cont.)

•Suggestions and recommendations may be reviewed by a higher level manager

•The exempt executive need not have authority to make the ultimate decision

•Making an occasional suggestion regarding a change in status of a co-worker does not meet the “particular weight” standard

•Concurrent performance of exempt and nonexempt work does not automatically disqualify an employee from exemption

Page 50: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Job Duties Test:Job Duties Test:Administrative Administrative ExemptionExemption

Page 51: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Administrative Exemption (Cont.)Administrative Exemption (Cont.)

•Whose primary duty consists of the performance of office or non-manual work directly related to management policies or general business operations of his employer or his employer’s customers: AND

•Whose primary duty includes the exercise of discretion and independent judgment with respect to matters of significance

Page 52: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Administrative Exemption (Cont.) Administrative Exemption (Cont.)

Breakdown of Administrative Breakdown of Administrative DutiesDuties

•Whose primary duty is the performance of office or non-manual work directly related to the management or general business operations of the employer or the employer’s customers; and

•Whose primary duty includes the exercise of discretion and independent judgment with respect to matters of significance

Key Defined Terms:

Page 53: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Administrative Exemption (Cont.)Administrative Exemption (Cont.) ““Management or General Business Management or General Business Operations”Operations”

•Refers to the type of work performed by the employee

•Work must be directly related to assisting with the running or servicing of the business

Page 54: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Administrative Exemption (Cont.)Administrative Exemption (Cont.) ““Management or General Business Management or General Business Operations” (Cont.)Operations” (Cont.)

• Tax• Finance• Accounting

• Budgeting• Auditing• Insurance• Quality Control• Purchasing• Procurement• Advertising• Marketing

• Research• Safety and Health• Human Resources• Employee Benefits• Labor Relations• Public and Government

Relations• Legal and Regulatory

Compliance• Computer Network,

Internet and Database Administration

Includes, but not limited to, functional areas such as:

Page 55: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Administrative Exemption (Cont.) Administrative Exemption (Cont.) “Discretion and Independent “Discretion and Independent Judgment”Judgment”

•Generally involves the comparison and evaluation of possible courses of conduct, and acting or making a decision after the various possibilities have been considered

•Must be exercised with respect to “matters of significance,” which refers to the level of importance or consequence of the work performed

•Decisions and recommendations may be reviewed at a higher level and, upon occasion, revised or reversed

Page 56: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Administrative Exemption (Cont.) Administrative Exemption (Cont.) “Discretion and Independent “Discretion and Independent Judgment” (Cont.)Judgment” (Cont.)

•“Matters of significance?” Factors include:Whether the employee has authority to formulate, affect, interpret, or implement management policies or operating practicesWhether the employee carries out major assignments in conducting the operations of the businessWhether the employee performs work that affects business operations to a substantial degree, even if the employee’s assignments are related to operation of a particular segment of the business

Page 57: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Administrative Exemption (Cont.) Administrative Exemption (Cont.) “Discretion and Independent “Discretion and Independent Judgment” (Cont.)Judgment” (Cont.)

Whether the employee has authority to commit the employer in matters that have significant financial impactWhether the employee has authority to waive or deviate from established policies and procedures without prior approvalWhether the employee has authority to negotiate and bind the company on significant mattersWhether the employee provides consultation or expert advice to management

Page 58: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Administrative Exemption (Cont.) Administrative Exemption (Cont.) “Discretion and Independent “Discretion and Independent Judgment” (Cont.)Judgment” (Cont.)

Whether the employee is involved in planning long- or short-term business objectivesWhether the employee investigates and resolves matters of significance on behalf of managementWhether the employee represents the company in handling complaints, arbitrating disputes or resolving grievances

Page 59: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Administrative Exemption (Cont.) Administrative Exemption (Cont.) “Discretion and Independent “Discretion and Independent Judgment” (Cont.)Judgment” (Cont.)

Discretion and independent judgment does not include:

Applying well-established techniques, procedures or specific standards described in manuals or other sourcesClerical or secretarial workRecording or tabulating dataPerforming mechanical, repetitive, recurrent or routine work

Page 60: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Administrative Exemption (Cont.) Administrative Exemption (Cont.) “Discretion and Independent “Discretion and Independent Judgment” (Cont.)Judgment” (Cont.)

•Exempt employees may use manuals, guidelines or other established procedures if they:

contain or relate to highly technical, scientific, legal, financial or other similarly complex mattersthat can be understood or interpreted only by those with advanced or specialized knowledge or skills

•Employees are not exempt if they use manuals to apply well-established techniques or procedures within closely prescribed limits

Page 61: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Administrative Exemption (Cont.) Administrative Exemption (Cont.) Industry-Specific Examples: Insurance Industry-Specific Examples: Insurance Claims AdjustersClaims Adjusters

•Exempt status depends on actual job duties•May be exempt if duties include:

Interviewing insureds, witnesses and physiciansInspecting property damageReviewing factual information to prepare damage estimatesEvaluating and making recommendations regarding coverage of claimsDetermining liability and total value of a claim; Negotiating settlementsMaking recommendations regarding litigation

Page 62: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Administrative Exemption (Cont.) Administrative Exemption (Cont.) Industry-Specific Examples:Industry-Specific Examples:Financial Services EmployeesFinancial Services Employees

•May be exempt if duties include:Collecting and analyzing information regarding the customer’s income, assets, investments or debtsDetermining which financial products best meet the customer’s needs and financial circumstancesAdvising the customer regarding the advantages and disadvantages of different financial productsMarketing, servicing or promoting the employer’s financial products

•An employee whose primary duty is selling financial products does not qualify for the administrative exemption

Page 63: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Administrative Exemption (Cont.) Administrative Exemption (Cont.) Industry-Specific Examples: Human Industry-Specific Examples: Human Resources EmployeesResources Employees

•Human resource managers who formulate, interpret or implement employment policies generally meet the administrative duties requirements

•Personnel clerks who “screen” applicants to obtain data regarding minimum qualifications and fitness for employment generally are not exempt administrative employees

Page 64: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Administrative Exemption (Cont.) Administrative Exemption (Cont.) Other Exempt Administrative PositionsOther Exempt Administrative Positions

•An employee who leads a team of other employees assigned to complete major projects

•Executive assistant or administrative assistant to a business owner or senior executive of a large business who has been delegated authority regarding matters of significance

•Management consultants who study the operations of a business and propose changes in organization

Page 65: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Administrative Exemption (Cont.) Administrative Exemption (Cont.) Non-Qualifying PositionsNon-Qualifying Positions

•Ordinary inspection work involving well-established techniques and procedures

•Examiners and graders who perform work involving comparison of products with established standards

•Comparison shoppers who merely report the prices at a competitor’s store

Page 66: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Job Duties Test:Job Duties Test:Professional ExemptionProfessional Exemption

Page 67: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Professional ExemptionProfessional Exemption

• Whose primary duty consists of the performance of work requiring knowledge of an advanced type (defined as work which is predominantly intellectual in character, and which includes work requiring the consistent exercise of discretion and judgment) in a field of science or learning customarily acquired by a prolonged course of specialized intellectual instructions; OR

• Whose primary duty is the performance of work requiring invention, imagination or “talent” in a recognized field of artistic or creative endeavor

Page 68: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Professional Exemption Professional Exemption (Cont.) The “Learned (Cont.) The “Learned Professional”Professional”

•The employee’s primary duty must be the performance of work requiring advanced knowledge

• In a field of science or learning

•Customarily acquired by a prolonged course of specialized intellectual instruction

Key Defined Terms:

Page 69: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Professional Exemption Professional Exemption (Cont.) “Advanced (Cont.) “Advanced Knowledge”Knowledge”

•Predominately intellectual in character

• Includes work requiring the consistent exercise of discretion and judgment

•The advanced knowledge is generally used to analyze, interpret or make deductions from varying facts or circumstances

•Cannot be attained at the high school level

Page 70: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Professional Exemption Professional Exemption (Cont.) “Field of Science or (Cont.) “Field of Science or Learning”Learning”

•Occupations with recognized professional status include:

Law Accounting Actuarial Computation

Theology Teaching Physical Sciences

Medicine Architecture Chemical Sciences

Pharmacy Engineering Biological Sciences

Page 71: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Professional Exemption (Cont.) Professional Exemption (Cont.) “Prolonged Course of Specialized “Prolonged Course of Specialized Intellectual Instruction”Intellectual Instruction”

•Specialized academic training is a prerequisite for entering the profession

•Best evidence that an employee meets this requirement is possession of the appropriate academic degree

Page 72: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Professional Exemption (Cont.) Professional Exemption (Cont.) “Prolonged Course of Specialized “Prolonged Course of Specialized Intellectual Instruction” (Cont.)Intellectual Instruction” (Cont.)

•Does not include occupations that may be performed with:

Only the general knowledge acquired by an academic degree in any fieldKnowledge acquired through an apprenticeship

•Does not apply to occupations in which most employees acquire skill by experience

Page 73: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Professional Exemption (Cont.) Professional Exemption (Cont.) Examples of Exempt ProfessionalsExamples of Exempt Professionals

• Lawyers

• Teachers

• Accountants

• Pharmacists

• Engineers

• Actuaries

• Chefs

• Athletic trainers

• Licensed funeral directors or embalmers

• Nurses (RNs, not LPNs)

Page 74: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Professional Exemption (Cont.) Professional Exemption (Cont.) Examples of Examples of Non-QualifyingNon-Qualifying ProfessionalsProfessionals

•Accounting clerks and bookkeepers who normally perform a great deal of routine work

•Cooks who perform predominantly routine mental, manual, mechanical or physical work

•Paralegals and legal assistants

•Engineering technicians

Page 75: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Professional Exemption Professional Exemption (Cont.) The “Creative (Cont.) The “Creative Professional”Professional”

•The employee’s primary duty must be the performance of work requiring invention, imagination, originality or talent in a recognized field of artistic or creative endeavor

Key Defined Terms:

Page 76: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Professional Exemption (Cont.) Professional Exemption (Cont.) “Recognized Field of Artistic or “Recognized Field of Artistic or Creative Endeavor”Creative Endeavor”

• MusicMusicians, composers, conductors, soloists

• WritingEssayists, novelists, short-story writers, play writersScreen play writers who choose their own subjectsResponsible writing positions in advertising agencies

• Acting

• Graphic ArtsPainters, photographers, cartoonists

Fields include:

Page 77: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Professional Exemption (Cont.) Professional Exemption (Cont.) “Invention, Imagination, “Invention, Imagination, Originality or Talent”Originality or Talent”•Must perform work requiring invention,

imagination, originality or talent

•Determined on a case-by-case basis, depending on the extent of the invention, imagination, originality or talent exercised

•Does not include:Work that primarily depends on intelligence, diligence and accuracyWork that can be produced by a person with general manual ability and training

Page 78: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Professional Exemption (Cont.) Professional Exemption (Cont.) Industry-Specific Examples: Industry-Specific Examples: JournalistsJournalists

•Employees of newspapers, magazines, television and other media are not exempt if they:

Collect, organize and record information that is routine or publicDo not contribute a unique interpretation or analysisTheir work product is subject to substantial control

• Journalists may be exempt if they:Perform on-air in radio or televisionConduct investigative interviewsAnalyze or interpret public eventsWrite editorials, opinion columns or commentary

Page 79: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Computer EmployeesComputer Employees

• The exemptions apply only to a computer employee whose primary duty consists of:(1) the application of systems analysis techniques and procedures, including consulting with users, to determine hardware, software or system functional specifications;

(2) the design, development, documentation, analysis, creation, testing or modification of computer systems or programs, including prototypes, based on and related to user or system design specifications;

Page 80: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Computer EmployeesComputer Employees

(3) the design, documentation, testing, creation or modification of computer programs related to machine operating systems; or

(4) a combination of the aforementioned duties, the performance of which requires the same level of skills

Page 81: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Computer EmployeesComputer Employees

• Other than the new minimum salary level of $455/wk (or $27.63/hr under FLSA Section 13(a)(17)) the exemption for computer employees has not changedNote, however, that certain computer employees who may not fall within this exemption may nonetheless qualify under the executive or administrative exemption, as applied under the new regulations

• Job titles not determinative• Does not include employees engaged in manufacture and

repair of computer hardware and related equipment• Example: a systems analyst is an exempt administrative

employee if primary duty includes work such as planning, scheduling and coordinating activities required to develop systems to solve complex problems of the employer or employer’s customers

Page 82: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

Outside Sales EmployeesOutside Sales Employees

• Employee whose primary duty is making sales or obtaining orders or contracts for services or for the use of facilities, and who is customarily and regularly engaged away from the employer’s place or places of business

• Work incidental to and in conjunction with the employees’ sales activities, including incidental deliveries and collections, are regarded as exempt outside sales work

• “Outside” sales refers to an employee who makes sales at the customer’s place of business or, if selling door-to-door, at the customer’s home. Does not include mail, telephone, or internet sales

• Promotional work that is incidental to and in conjunction with employee’s own sales work is exempt outside sales work

Page 83: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

What do we do now?What do we do now?

•Unless Congress blocks the new regulations, employers have until August 23, 2004 to become compliant; Do not wait and see what happens

•Consult with human resources and in-house and outside legal counsel to develop a strategy to comply with these regulations

•Review current salary levels for current exempt and determine who is below $455 per week

Page 84: The New Overtime Regulations Under The Fair Labor Standards Act September 30, 2004 David B. Ritter Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 North LaSalle Street

What do we do now?What do we do now?

•Review current non-exempt employees whose earnings exceed $100,000 per year; Do they now qualify under the Highly Compensated employee test

•Review payroll practices regarding deductions

•Develop a Safe Harbor policy

•Review job duties and determine whether positions should be reclassified