the new science centre project - rpic- · pdf filethe new science centre project ... –...

30
The New Science Centre Project Case Study: Design Optimization of an Active Sub Slab Depressurization System to Mitigate Vapour Intrusion of Methane Gas from Former City of Calgary Landfill Presented by: Beth McReynolds E.I.T., Environmental Engineer AMEC Environment & Infrastructure

Upload: lamkien

Post on 16-Mar-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

The New Science Centre Project Case Study: Design Optimization of an Active Sub Slab Depressurization System to Mitigate Vapour Intrusion of Methane Gas from Former City of Calgary Landfill Presented by: Beth McReynolds E.I.T., Environmental Engineer AMEC Environment & Infrastructure

2

Outline

§ Proposed Development § Project Background § Environmental Management Controls § Vapour Intrusion § Methane Properties § Methane Mitigation Controls § Secondary Methane Mitigation Controls § Results § Performance Monitoring §  LEED in Brownfield development

3

Proposed Development – New Science Centre

§  153 000 ft2 new science centre to replace former science centre that was in

operation for 44 years §  Built on a structural slab foundation §  Three story complex with attached dome theatre §  First new state-of-the-art science centre in Canada in the 21st Century §  Municipal, Provincial and National hub for innovation §  Opened October 29th, 2011

4

Project Background – Site Description

5

Project Background – Historical Environmental Investigations

AMEC involved since the early 1990s: § Bird and wildlife surveys § Surface water quality assessment § Extensive drilling/sampling to assess soil and

groundwater conditions § Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment § Preparation of a Remedial Action Plan to use

site as a Urban Park § Engineering report in support of application for

variance of landfill setback § Environmental Management Plan (EMP) in

support of Development Permit

6

Project Background – Key Environmental Concerns

7

Environmental Management Controls

§ Removal of waste piles prior to construction § Characterization, segregation and offsite

removal of waste debris encountered during construction

§  Importation of fill to raise surface elevation ~ 2m to mitigate impacts of being located in a flood fringe

§ Collection of surface water to avoid direct runoff into the adjacent Nose Creek

§  Implementation of mitigation measures to address vapour intrusion potential into site building from underlying construction & demolition wastes and adjacent municipal solid waste

8 8

What is Vapour Intrusion?

§ Soil gas migration from subsurface to overlying and/or adjacent buildings

§ Common Sources § Methane § Radon § VOC’s

§  Transport § Preferential Pathways

Provided by ITRC, January 2007

9 9

Vapour Intrusion– Landfill Gas

Methane Properties § CH4

§ Simplest hydrocarbon (alkane) § Gas at room temperature §  Less dense (lighter) than air §  Forms explosive mixtures with air (5 – 15% Gas) § Colourless § Odourless § Relatively insoluble in water § Simple asphyxiant

10

Methane Mitigation Controls – Design Objective

To reduce the potential for methane gas to accumulate

to harmful levels inside site facilities

11

Methane Mitigation Controls – Design Challenges

§ Structural Slab

–  Sub slab settlement

§ Building size/configuration § Shallow groundwater

–  moisture

§ Visibility –  interior aesthetics –  exterior - Hwy 2/C-train route, urban park, residential

§ Acoustics –  adjacent residential neighborhood –  Internal vibrations/noise levels

§ Energy efficiency § Minimal maintenance

–  completely automated

12

Methane Mitigation Controls – Design Selection

§ Primary Mitigation Technology Selected: − Active sub slab depressurization (SSD) selected

§ Optimization features: − Variable Frequency Drive –  Inline combustible gas sensor

– Acoustical Isolation – Contingency moisture knockout

§ Secondary Mitigation Controls –  Inbuilding monitoring system – Utility blocks/vents

13

Methane Mitigation Controls – SSD

§ Key System Components − Powered extraction unit − General synthetic barriers not required − Permeable layer beneath floor slab (e.g. gravel) − Perforated piping network completed with risers for venting of soil gas − Hangers to suspend collection piping

§ Design parameters − Flow = 3000 CFM − Vacuum = 50 in. H20 − Sub slab vacuum range = 0.01 to 0.1 In.H20

§ Equivalent pipe length method used to size piping

14

SSD – Sub Slab Piping Layout

15

SSD – Perforated/Solid Collection Piping

16

SSD – Header System

17

SSD – Extraction Fan

18

SSD - Variable Frequency Drive/Inline Combustible Gas Sensor

Extraction fan speed is controlled by a variable frequency drive and inline combustible gas sensor

§  Low Speed = 50% capacity or 1500 cfm § High Speed = 100% capacity or 3000 cfm Fan Sequence of Operation §  If inline methane concentrations remain below

15% LEL fan runs continuously at Low Speed. §  If inline methane concentrations exceed the

15% LEL set point, fan is increased to High Speed; fan remains at high speed until concentrations fall back below the set point.

19

SSD - Exhaust Acoustical Isolation

20

Secondary Mitigation Controls - Inbuilding Monitoring System

Two Stage In-building Alarm System tied to Building Management Sytem

§ Alarm # 1 > 5% LEL (2 500 PPM): – activation of HVAC system – automated notification to property manager

§ Alarm # 2 > 25% LEL (12 500ppm): – evacuation via activation of fire alarm system – activation of blue strobes located at employee

entrance – METHANE specific signal sent to Fire

Department message – automated notification to property manager

§ Sensor locations based on: – manufacturers area of coverage – building configuration and confined spaces

21

Secondary Mitigation Controls -Inbuilding Monitoring System

22

Secondary Mitigation Controls – Utility Blocks/Vents

23

Secondary Mitigation Controls – Utility Blocks/Vents

24

Results: Design vs. Actual Flow Rates

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

A B C D E F G H I J K

CFM

Location

Design

Actual

25

Results: Sub Slab Pressure 30 Hz

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

MP1 MP2 MP3 MP4 MP5 MP6 MP7 MP8

In.H

20

Pressure Field @ 30 Hz

26

Results: Sub Slab Pressure 60 Hz

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

MP1 MP2 MP3 MP4 MP5 MP6 MP7 MP8

In.H

20

Pressure Field @ 60 Hz

27

Energy Optimization

$0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 $30,000 $35,000

High Speed

Low Speed

Dollars ($)

Cost Comparison

28

Post Construction SSD System Refinement

§  Refinement efforts undertaken to allow for modification to pressure fields and fan speed/size

§  Refinement based on attaining as even as possible vacuum beneath floor slab via: § Adjustment of fan speed and

types § Adjustment of valves at header

to control flow §  Sub-slab Vacuum monitored

through access ports connected to low vacuum sensitivity gauges

29

LEED in Brownfield Development

§ New Science Centre applicant for LEED certification

§ Sustainable Site, Credit 3 – Redevelopment of Contaminated Sites

30 30

Questions?

Beth McReynolds, E.I.T. Intermediate Environmental Engineer

AMEC Environment & Infrastructure

140 Quarry Park Blvd SE Calgary, AB T2C 3G3 Phone: (403) 248-4331

[email protected]