the next generation of atlas user interfaces -...

15
This presentation is co-financed by the European Social Fund and the state budget of the Czech Republic. The Next Generation of Atlas User Interfaces – A User Study with “Digital Natives” Raimund Schnürer, René Sieber, Arzu Çöltekin ETH Zurich, University of Zurich

Upload: dangthuan

Post on 05-Aug-2019

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

This presentation is co-financed by theEuropean Social Fund and the statebudget of the Czech Republic.

The Next Generation of Atlas User Interfaces – A User Study with “Digital Natives”

Raimund Schnürer, René Sieber, Arzu Çöltekin

ETH Zurich, University of Zurich

Attract a younger audience with our atlas

Motivation

htt

p:/

/ww

w.m

nn

.co

m/s

ites

/def

ault

/file

s/ed

ito

rial

/sh

utt

erst

ock

_115

1233

81.jp

g

htt

p:/

/1z8

j561

n17

ze1

4agf

o2d

o77

bd

4g.w

pen

gin

e.n

etd

na-

cdn

.co

m/w

p-c

on

ten

t/u

plo

ads/

tab

let-

kid

4.jp

eg

htt

p:/

/tex

assu

cces

s.o

rg/w

p-c

on

ten

t/u

plo

ads/

2012

/07/

wh

ite

-bo

y-la

pto

p.jp

g

htt

p:/

/ww

w.s

amsu

ng.

com

/glo

bal

/art

icle

/co

nsu

mer

-im

ages

/art

icle

/201

2/0

9/18

/Kid

s-0.

JPG

2Schnürer, Sieber, Çöltekin – The Next Generation of Atlas User Interfaces

WANTED

Digital Natives

Born In 1980 or later

Familiar With Digital Devices

Possess Different thinking and

acting patterns

[Prensky 2001]

Test participants

110 students (61 female, 49 male) from secondary schools in Switzerland

14-15 years old

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

daily neverweekly monthly2-4 daysa week

Computer/Tablet usage

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Map usage

daily neverweekly monthly2-4 daysa week

3Schnürer, Sieber, Çöltekin – The Next Generation of Atlas User Interfaces

Test procedure

Online survey (SelectSurvey.NET)

Computer lab

5 Atlas GUI layouts varying in layout density and tool arrangement

5 typical use cases for atlases

4

Mouse click coordinates captured (max. 10 clicks per task)

Times captured (max. 20 seconds per task)

Overall rating of the five layouts (attractiveness, usability)

Schnürer, Sieber, Çöltekin – The Next Generation of Atlas User Interfaces

Atlas GUI Layouts

Google Maps style YouTube style

5Schnürer, Sieber, Çöltekin – The Next Generation of Atlas User Interfaces

Minimalistic style Desktop style Tablet style

Atlas GUI Layouts

6Schnürer, Sieber, Çöltekin – The Next Generation of Atlas User Interfaces

Minimalistic style Desktop style Tablet style

Google Maps style YouTube style

Tasks

1) Change theme: Switch from “Geology” to “Raw materials”

2) Find legend: Resolve the meaning of map colors and symbols in the map

3) Map query: Determine the name of the settlement and the underlying geological structure in the center of the map

4) Map info: Access additional media (e.g. text, images)

5) Spatial orientation: Find out where the displayed map region is located within Switzerland

7Schnürer, Sieber, Çöltekin – The Next Generation of Atlas User Interfaces

Example

Find the legend

Task completed

8Schnürer, Sieber, Çöltekin – The Next Generation of Atlas User Interfaces

Performance metrics (effectiveness and efficiency)

Results

Successfully completed tasks

Average time spent on a task

Normalizednumber of mouse clicks for a task

Minimalistic style 66% 8.93s 2.51

Desktop style 72% 9.21s 3.31

Tablet style 90% 5.37s 1.85

Google Maps style 93% 4.52s 1.87

YouTube style 78% 7.87s 2.53

9Schnürer, Sieber, Çöltekin – The Next Generation of Atlas User Interfaces

Results

Access additional map information (e.g. text, images)

Google Maps style YouTube style

10Schnürer, Sieber, Çöltekin – The Next Generation of Atlas User Interfaces

Switch the theme from “Geology” to “Raw materials”

Results

First clicks Following clicks

11Schnürer, Sieber, Çöltekin – The Next Generation of Atlas User Interfaces

Results

Overall attractiveness and usability rating

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Ave

rage

Pre

fere

nce

Before task solving After task solving

12

Minimalistic style Desktop style Tablet style Google Maps style YouTube style

Schnürer, Sieber, Çöltekin – The Next Generation of Atlas User Interfaces

Conclusions

Atlas GUIs with a large map panel and a slim interface are not preferred by Digital Natives

Digital Natives performed significantly better in Atlas GUIs with a medium tool density

Recommendations:

Functions/Tools should be grouped, not distributed

GUI elements should be tested for ambiguity

The use and effect of a tool should be easily recognizable

13Schnürer, Sieber, Çöltekin – The Next Generation of Atlas User Interfaces

Outlook

htt

p:/

/mem

ory

care

az.c

om

/car

e/w

p-c

on

ten

t/u

plo

ads/

2010

/11

/Gra

nd

fath

er-

on

-co

mp

ute

r.jp

g

Silver Surfers Tablets

More complex tasks and more realistic interfaces

14

Inter-subject tests

Schnürer, Sieber, Çöltekin – The Next Generation of Atlas User Interfaces

htt

p:/

/ww

w.ic

on

ho

t.co

m/i

con

/pn

g/b

rush

-in

ten

se-m

esse

nge

r/25

6/b

ud

dy-

ble

u.p

ng

htt

p:/

/pn

g-4.

fin

dic

on

s.co

m/f

iles/

ico

ns/

2279

/bru

sh_

inte

nse

_m

esse

nge

r/2

56/m

sn_m

ob

ile.p

ng

htt

p:/

/file

s.so

ftic

on

s.co

m/d

ow

nlo

ad/a

pp

licat

ion

-ico

ns/

mes

sen

ger-

ico

ns-

by-

tati

ce/p

ng/

256

/En

%20

lign

e.p

ng

Thank you for your attention!

15Schnürer, Sieber, Çöltekin – The Next Generation of Atlas User Interfaces

Raimund Schnü[email protected]

Institute of Cartography and Geoinformation, ETH Zurich