the o ptical s cintillation by e xtraterrestrial r efractors project
DESCRIPTION
Search for Galactic hidden gas. The O ptical S cintillation by E xtraterrestrial R efractors Project. A&A 412, 105-120 (2003) ( astro-ph/0302460). Marc MONIEZ, IN2P3, CNRS. Tucson 03/19/2010. OSER project : measure the last unknown contribution to the baryonic hidden matter: cold H 2 (+He). - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
The Optical
Scintillation by
Extraterrestrial
Refractors
Project
Tucson 03/19/2010 Marc MONIEZ, IN2P3, CNRS
Search for Galactic hidden gas
A&A 412, 105-120 (2003)(astro-ph/0302460)
• Cold (10K) => no emission. Transparent medium.
• In the thick disk or/and in the halo
• Average column density toward LMC
OSER project: measure the last unknown contribution to the baryonic hidden matter: cold H2 (+He)
250g/m2 <=> columnof 3m H2 (normal cond.)
• Fractal structure: covers ~1% of the sky.Clumpuscules ~10 AU(Pfenniger & Combes 1994) ~300m H2 over 1% of the sky
These clouds refract light
• Extra optical path due to H2 medium Varies from 0 (99% sky) to ~80 000 (1%) @
=500nm
• If the medium has column density fluctuations (turbulences) of order of a few 10-6 then wavefront distorsions may be detectable
Scintillation through a diffusive screenPropagation of distorted wave surface driven by:
Fresnel diffraction + « global » refraction
Pattern moves at the
speed of the screen
Mo
no
ch
rom
ati
c
=2
.18
Po
lyc
hro
ma
tic
(Ks
pas
sb
an
d)
Point source Extended source
m=1.08
m=0.76
m=0.23
m=0.23m = I/I = modulation index
Illumination in Ks by a K0V star@8kpc (mV=20.4) through a cloud@160pc with Rdiff =150km
Simulation towards B68
Simulated light curve
Distance scales5 distance scales are found in the speckle pattern• Diffusion radius Rdiff
• separation such that: [(r+Rdiff)-(r)] = 1 radian• Characterizes the turbulence
• Fresnel radius RF
• scale of Fresnel diffraction ~103 km @=1 for gas@1kpc
• Refraction radius Rref
• diffractive spot of Rdiff patches ~ 2RF2/Rdiff
• Larger scale structures of the diffusive gaz can play a role if focusing/defocusing configurations happen
• Projected source size RSspeckle from a pointlike source isconvoluted by the source projected profile
Rdiff : Statistical characterization of a stochastic screen
Size of domain where(phase)= 1 radian• i.e. (at = 500 nm)(column density nl) = 1.8x1018 molecules/cm2
• This corresponds to- nl/nl ~ 10-6 for disk/halo clumpuscule- nl/nl ~ 10-4 for Bok globule (NTT search)
Modulation indexEssentially depends onRS/Rref
-> not on the details of the power spectrum of the fluctuations
RS/Rref
I/I
z1 is the cloud-source distance
Scintillation of Sun@10kpc
through a cloud with Rdiff=1000km
at = 1 m
Time scale
If Rdiff < Rref, then Rref is the largest scale and :
Wherez0 is the distance to the cloudVT is the relative speed of the cloud w/r to the l.o.s.
Signature of scintillation• Stochastic light-curve (not random)
– Autocorrelation (power spectrum)– Characteristic times (10’s minutes)– Modulation index can be as high as 5%
• decreases with star radius• depends on cloud structure
• Signatures of a propagation effect– Chromaticity (optical wavelengths)
• Long time-scale variations (10’s min.) ~ achromatic• Short time-scale variations (~ min.) strongly change with
– Correlation between light-curves obtained with 2 telescopes decreases with their distance
Fore and back-grounds
• Atmospheric turbulencePrism effects, image dispersion, BUT I/I < 1% at any time scale in a
big telescope
BECAUSE speckle with 3cm length scale is averaged in a >1m aperture
• High altitude cirrusesWould induce easy-to-detect collective absorption on neighbour
stars. Scintillation by a 10AU structure affect one only star.
• Gas at ~10pcScintillation would also occur on the biggest stars
• Intrinsic variabilityRare at this time scale and only with special stars (UV Ceti, flaring Wolf-Rayet)
Optical depth due to halo gas towards LMC
scintillation = 10-2 x x S
Where• 10-2 is the max. surface coverage of the fractal structures • is the fraction of halo into molecular gas• S depends on the structuration… Unknown
Telescope > 2 metersFast readout Camera
2 camerasWide field
Requirements for detection towards LMC
• Assuming Rdiff = 1000km (10 AU clumpuscules)• 5% modulation@500nm => rs < rA5 (105/deg2)
Smaller than A5 type in LMC => MV~20.5 Characteristic time ~ 1 min. => few sec. exposures Photometric precision required ~1%
Dead-time < few sec. => B and R partially correlated => Optical depth probably small =>
What will we learn from detection or non-detection?
• Expect 1000x fluctuating light-curves (>5%) when monitoring 105 stars if column density fluctuations > 10-6
within 1000km• If detection
– Get details on the clumpuscule (structure, column density -> mass) through modelling (reverse problem)
– Measure contribution to galactic hidden matter
• If no detection– Get max. contribution of clumpuscules as a function of their
structuration parameter Rdiff (fluctuations of column density)
• 9599 stars monitored• ~ 1000 exposures/night• Search for ~10%
variability on the 933 best measured stars
• Signal if nl)/(nl) ~ 10-4 per ~1000 km (nl = column density)
• Mainly test for back-ground and feasibility
Test towards Bok globule B68NTT IR (2 nights in june 2006)
Test towards Bok globule B68
NTT IR (2 nights)
one fluctuating star?(other than known artifacts)
⁄⁄
Time (103s)
Conclusion: optical interstellar scintillation with LSST
• LSST has the capacity for this search– Large enough (diameter and field)– Fast readout (2s) -> allows fast sampling
• But current sampling strategy does not fit– Need few hours series of short exposures– But no need for regular long time sampling (contrary to
microlensing or SN searches)
• Complementary synchronized observations for– test of chromaticity– decorrelation with distant simultaneous observations
complements
For the future…
A network of distant telescopes• Would allow to decorrelate scintillation from
interstellar clouds and atmospheric effects• Snapshot of interferometric pattern + follow-up
Simultaneous Rdiff and VT measurements
=> positions and dynamics of the cloudsPlus structuration of the clouds (inverse problem)
Expected difficulties, cures• Blending (crowded field)=> differential photometry• Delicate analysis
– Detect and Subtract collective effects– Search for a not well defined signal
• VIRGO robust filtering techniques (short duration signal)• Autocorrelation function (long duration signal)• Time power spectrum, essential tool for the inversion
problem(as in radio-astronomy)
• If interesting event => complementary observations (large telescope photometry, spectroscopy, synchronized telescopes…)