The Obama Long Form Birth Certificate Forgery Testby Squeeky Fromm, Girl Reporter for The Birther Think Tank

First, let us get a workable definition of forgery. This one, from the Free Legal Dictionary, seemstypical:

The creation of a false written document or alteration of a genuine one, with the intentto defraud.

Forgery consists of filling in blanks on a document containing a genuine signature, ormaterially altering or erasing an existing instrument. An underlying intent to defraud,based on knowledge of the false nature of the instrument, must accompany the act.

Since the word defraud is used twice, let’s define that word also, from the same source:

[T]o use deceit, falsehoods, or trickery to obtain money, an object, rights or anything of valuebelonging to another.

Legally, any erroneous information would have to have been put in, or altered, with the intent todefraud, so that simple clerical errors or harmless mistakes would not constitute forgery. Forexample, if a clerk penciled in the number “9" for the Father’s Race, when the correct code shouldhave been “2", there is no forgery. Mainly, because there was no evil intent and no one is beingdefrauded of anything.

Suppose Obama’s real father was Frank Marshall Davis, and not Barack Obama Sr., and StanleyDunham did not know this, perhaps having slept with both men. Then there would be no forgery.There is no intent to defraud. If, on the other hand, she knew that Frank Marshall Davis (FMD) wasthe actual father, but listed BO, Sr. as the father anyway, then there would be forgery, of a sort, bythe creation of a false document.

But even then, the intent to defraud somebody would have to be proven. It is possible that FMD andBO, Sr. could have agreed to such a listing. Or, if by supplying false information, Stanley Dunhamsought to obtain something of value, either money or some right, then there could have been anintent to defraud. The important thing is that the intent to defraud has to be proven, not just assumed.

By definition, any alteration would have to be legally material, that is significant and important,to fit within the definition of forgery. For example, if someone altered the place of birth from Kenyato Hawaii, that would be material. If someone enhanced a barely legible letter, to make it morelegible, that would be probably be immaterial. Either way, an intent to defraud would still have tobe proven.

All right, now that we have a workable definition of forgery and the intent to defraud and material,let’s look at the online long form:

I went through the document and here is a list of 43 items which constitute the information containedon the online document:

File Number 151 on top

Certificate Number 61 10641 on top

Green Security Paper Background

Apr 25 2011 stamped on bottom

Certification on bottom with handwritten Alvin T. Onaka, Ph.D. and stamped State Registrar

1a. Child’s First Name – Barack

1b. Child’s Middle Name – Hussein

1c. Child’s Last Name – Obama, II

2. Sex – Male

3. This Birth – single block marked (as opposed to twin or triplet) and two “x’s” and a “dash”penciled in.

4. If Twin or Triplets Was Child Born 1st, 2nd, 3rd – No Information Entered

5a. Birth Date – August 4, 1961

5b. Hour - 7:24 PM

6a. Place of Birth (City) – Honolulu

6b. Island – Oahu

6c. Name of Hospital – Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital

6d. Is Place of Birth Inside City Limits – Yes block is marked.

7a. Usual Residence of Mother (City) – Honolulu

7b. Island – Oahu

7c. County and State – Honolulu, Hawaii

7d. Street Address – 6085 Kalanianaole Highway

7e. Is Residence Inside City Limits – Yes blocked is marked

7f. Mother’s Mailing Address – No Information Entered

7g. Is Residence Inside City Limits – Yes block is marked and number “2" is penciled in.

8. Full Name of Father – Barack Hussein Obama

9. Race of Father – African and number “9" is penciled in.

10. Age of Father – 25

11. Birthplace – Kenya, East Africa and number “2" is penciled in.

12a. Usual Occupation – Student and a “dash” and a “o” are penciled in.

12b. Kind of Business or Occupation – University and number “9" is penciled in.

13. Full Maiden Name of Mother – Stanley Ann Dunham

14. Race of Mother – Caucasian and number “1" is penciled in.

15. Age of Mother – 18

16. Birthplace – Wichita, Kansas and an “a” (?) is penciled in.

17a. Type of Occupation Outside Home During Pregnancy – None and a “0" is penciled in.

17b. Date Last Worked – No Information Entered and a “0" is penciled in.

18a. Signature of Parent – Handwritten (Stanley) Ann Dunham Obama, with block checked forParent.

18b. Date of Signature – Handwritten 8-7-61

19a. Signature of Attendant – Handwritten David A. Sinclair with “M.D.” block checked.

20. Date Accepted by Local Registrar – Stamped August 8, 1961

21. Signature of Local Registrar – Handwritten U K L Lee

22. Date Accepted by Reg. General – Stamped August 9 – 1961

23. Evidence for Delayed Filing or Alteration – No Information Entered

Now, for the Test.

Question 1: Which item(s) of information above has been substantially proven by The Cold CasePosse to be an alteration of a genuine one, that is, information materially altered and different fromthe original long form birth certificate???

Answer:

Question 2: Which item(s) of information above has been substantially proven by The Cold CasePosse to be false???

Answer:

Question 3: Which item(s) of information above has been substantially proven by The Cold CasePosse to constitute any intent to defraud some other person and obtain some benefit???

Answer:.

Question 4: Notwithstanding any other question and/or answer, which item(s) of information abovehas been substantially proven by The Cold Case Posse to constitute a legally material alteration ofany original information???

Answer:

For each Answer above, please provide a detailed explanation and a copy of the evidence.

Explanation and Evidence:

Please feel free to attach additional pages as needed.