the oxford handbook of nutrition and dietetics

2
The Glycaemic Index: A Physiological Classification of Dietary Carbohydrates Wolever TMS. Cabi Publishing, Oxfordshire, UK, 2006, 272 pages, 60 pounds, ISBN 1-84593-0517 So, you think you know everything you need to know about the glycaemic index (GI), glycaemic load (GL) and glycaemic response? You may be surprised . . . The seminal paper ‘Glycemic index of foods: a physiologi- cal basis for carbohydrate exchange’ was published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition in March 1981. Along with Dr David Jenkins, Tom Wolever was one of the co-inventors of the glycaemic index concept. As the title of the paper suggests, the GI was originally invented to ‘correct’ carbohydrate exchanges so that they more closely reflected the physiological response of people with diabetes to carbo- hydrates in foods, and was envisaged to be only of use to that particular group of people. Over 25 years later, several thou- sand studies from around the world have examined the accuracy, reliability, validity, epidemiological associations with chronic disease, and clinical utility of the GI concept. Throughout this time period, Professor Wolever has been one of the main driving forces behind this research. It was only in 1997 that the glycaemic load (GL), which is the product of the GI multiplied by the amount of available carbohydrate (GL = GI (%) ¥ available carbohydrate), was conceptualised by the nutritional epidemiologists at Harvard University in the USA. In the past 10 years, both the GI and the GL have captured the imagination of researchers, clinicians and lay people alike, triggering a dramatic upsurge in scientific research into car- bohydrate metabolism, and much popular debate. Perhaps to mark the end of the first 25 years of GI research, Professor Wolever has written this comprehensive review and analysis of most, if not all, the research into the GI and the GL. The journey starts with a brief history of the scientific investigation of the effect of carbohydrates on health going back 150 years. The author then very carefully defines GI, explaining clearly why it is not the same as glycaemic response. While at first glance this may not sound all that ground breaking, it is this very issue that is one of the major underlying causes of much of the current confusion about the measurement, and clinical utility of both the GI and GL. Following this, we are given an in-depth description of how to determine the GI of a food accurately and reliably, with careful consideration of the factors which do and do not affect the final result. Many people may also have heard of the insulin index, and thought that, due to the hormone’s central role in fuel metabolism, it is probably more important than either the GI and GL? Professor Wolever meticulously analyses the current techniques used to assess insulin metabolism, and compares and contrasts it to glucose metabolism and the GI. The result will surprise many . . . Next, we visit the much vexed issue of the use of the GI in mixed meals. As well as critically reviewing the published data on the topic, Professor Wolever demonstrates his math- ematical prowess by re-analysing the published data from around the world, so that we are comparing like with like. These data provide compelling evidence that the GI of mixed meals can be predicted with an acceptable degree of accuracy to enable its clinical use. From here the book traces the role of the GI in the promotion of good health through improvements in physical and mental performance, as well as the prevention and man- agement of overweight and obesity. Finally, he explores the complex relationship that is emerging between GI and chronic disease risk. The evidence linking the development of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease and certain cancers is critically examined, and sug- gestions for further areas of research are put fourth. Targeted squarely at health professionals, this book is truly the definitive summary of research into the GI, GL and glycaemic carbohydrate. In fact, if anything, some will find it just a little too detailed and may find the complex math- ematical proofs a little overwhelming. However, it is an absolute must for anyone conducting serious research in to the area of glycaemic carbohydrate, and a great resource for anyone interested in this much debated and often misunder- stood concept. Alan Barclay, APD PhD Candidate, University of Sydney Sydney, New South Wales, Australia The Oxford Handbook of Nutrition and Dietetics Webster-Gandy J, Madden A, Holdsworth M. Oxford Uni- versity Press, Oxford, UK, 2006, 730 pages, 24.95 pounds, ISBN 0-19-856725-1 This publication is one of a series 40 or so Oxford Hand- books which cover a wide range of health-care specialities from urology to applied dental science, and includes public health practice. The authors indicate they have not intended to publish yet another pocket book for use by clinical dietitians. They have instead aimed to present compact, concise and accessible information on key aspects of nutrition science, therapeutics and community public health nutrition that will be useful to a range of health professionals practicing in a variety of settings. The editors are all registered dietitians with substantial research and practice track records. There are 19 additional contributors with a good mix of academics and practitioners, at least 12 of whom are dietitians. The editors and contributors are certainly well credentialled to produce this publication. There is a comprehensive list of abbreviations and medical shorthand. Ten appendices provide a range of useful and mostly expected information, a good deal of which is, as expected, UK specific. Some particularly useful and generic inclusions in the anthropometric appendix are the Cole body mass index (BMI) cut-offs for overweight and obesity in 2- to Book reviews © 2007 The Authors Journal compilation © 2007 Dietitians Association of Australia 217

Upload: lynne-daniels

Post on 21-Jul-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


6 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Oxford Handbook of Nutrition and Dietetics

The Glycaemic Index: A PhysiologicalClassification of Dietary Carbohydrates

Wolever TMS. Cabi Publishing, Oxfordshire, UK, 2006,272 pages, 60 pounds, ISBN 1-84593-0517So, you think you know everything you need to know aboutthe glycaemic index (GI), glycaemic load (GL) and glycaemicresponse? You may be surprised . . .

The seminal paper ‘Glycemic index of foods: a physiologi-cal basis for carbohydrate exchange’ was published in theAmerican Journal of Clinical Nutrition in March 1981. Alongwith Dr David Jenkins, Tom Wolever was one of theco-inventors of the glycaemic index concept. As the title ofthe paper suggests, the GI was originally invented to ‘correct’carbohydrate exchanges so that they more closely reflectedthe physiological response of people with diabetes to carbo-hydrates in foods, and was envisaged to be only of use to thatparticular group of people. Over 25 years later, several thou-sand studies from around the world have examined theaccuracy, reliability, validity, epidemiological associationswith chronic disease, and clinical utility of the GI concept.Throughout this time period, Professor Wolever has beenone of the main driving forces behind this research.

It was only in 1997 that the glycaemic load (GL), which isthe product of the GI multiplied by the amount of availablecarbohydrate (GL = GI (%) ¥ available carbohydrate), wasconceptualised by the nutritional epidemiologists at HarvardUniversity in the USA.

In the past 10 years, both the GI and the GL have capturedthe imagination of researchers, clinicians and lay people alike,triggering a dramatic upsurge in scientific research into car-bohydrate metabolism, and much popular debate.

Perhaps to mark the end of the first 25 years of GIresearch, Professor Wolever has written this comprehensivereview and analysis of most, if not all, the research into theGI and the GL.

The journey starts with a brief history of the scientificinvestigation of the effect of carbohydrates on health goingback 150 years. The author then very carefully defines GI,explaining clearly why it is not the same as glycaemicresponse. While at first glance this may not sound all thatground breaking, it is this very issue that is one of the majorunderlying causes of much of the current confusion aboutthe measurement, and clinical utility of both the GI and GL.Following this, we are given an in-depth description of howto determine the GI of a food accurately and reliably, withcareful consideration of the factors which do and do notaffect the final result.

Many people may also have heard of the insulin index,and thought that, due to the hormone’s central role in fuelmetabolism, it is probably more important than either the GIand GL? Professor Wolever meticulously analyses the currenttechniques used to assess insulin metabolism, and comparesand contrasts it to glucose metabolism and the GI. The resultwill surprise many . . .

Next, we visit the much vexed issue of the use of the GI inmixed meals. As well as critically reviewing the published

data on the topic, Professor Wolever demonstrates his math-ematical prowess by re-analysing the published data fromaround the world, so that we are comparing like with like.These data provide compelling evidence that the GI of mixedmeals can be predicted with an acceptable degree of accuracyto enable its clinical use.

From here the book traces the role of the GI in thepromotion of good health through improvements in physicaland mental performance, as well as the prevention and man-agement of overweight and obesity.

Finally, he explores the complex relationship that isemerging between GI and chronic disease risk. The evidencelinking the development of type 2 diabetes, cardiovasculardisease and certain cancers is critically examined, and sug-gestions for further areas of research are put fourth.

Targeted squarely at health professionals, this book istruly the definitive summary of research into the GI, GL andglycaemic carbohydrate. In fact, if anything, some will find itjust a little too detailed and may find the complex math-ematical proofs a little overwhelming. However, it is anabsolute must for anyone conducting serious research in tothe area of glycaemic carbohydrate, and a great resource foranyone interested in this much debated and often misunder-stood concept.

Alan Barclay, APDPhD Candidate, University of Sydney

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

The Oxford Handbook of Nutritionand Dietetics

Webster-Gandy J, Madden A, Holdsworth M. Oxford Uni-versity Press, Oxford, UK, 2006, 730 pages, 24.95pounds, ISBN 0-19-856725-1This publication is one of a series 40 or so Oxford Hand-books which cover a wide range of health-care specialitiesfrom urology to applied dental science, and includes publichealth practice. The authors indicate they have notintended to publish yet another pocket book for use byclinical dietitians. They have instead aimed to presentcompact, concise and accessible information on key aspectsof nutrition science, therapeutics and community publichealth nutrition that will be useful to a range of healthprofessionals practicing in a variety of settings. The editorsare all registered dietitians with substantial research andpractice track records. There are 19 additional contributorswith a good mix of academics and practitioners, at least 12of whom are dietitians. The editors and contributorsare certainly well credentialled to produce this publication.

There is a comprehensive list of abbreviations and medicalshorthand. Ten appendices provide a range of useful andmostly expected information, a good deal of which is, asexpected, UK specific. Some particularly useful and genericinclusions in the anthropometric appendix are the Cole bodymass index (BMI) cut-offs for overweight and obesity in 2- to

Book reviews

© 2007 The AuthorsJournal compilation © 2007 Dietitians Association of Australia

217

Page 2: The Oxford Handbook of Nutrition and Dietetics

18-year-olds, and percentile charts for mid-arm circumfer-ence and tricep skin folds. There is a basic protein (2 g, 6 gand negligible) and carbohydrate exchange list, and a rela-tively comprehensive list of household measure weights thatwill be of generic use. The appendix on useful contactsincludes a list of UK nutritional product manufacturers,which will not be nearly as useful to the Australian reader asthe comprehensive list of international (no Australian) andUK websites. There is also a 50-item long bibliography andfurther reading list. On the inside of the front and backcovers are a BMI ready reckoner and the MUST screeningtool, respectively.

The main text is divided into 35 chapters. The firstsection comprises eight introductory chapters, includingdefinitions, dietary reference values and dietary guidelines,current UK dietary patterns, food labelling, non-nutritivefood components and drug–nutrient interactions. Thechapter on nutritional assessment is comprehensive andcontains some useful tables to summarise factors in choos-ing an individual dietary assessment method and comparethe characteristics of body composition methods, and alsoprovides knee height equations to predict stature. There isa large section that provides necessarily very brief informa-tion on the expected range of macronutrients, vitamins,minerals and electrolytes. The format is standard andincludes sections on function, measurement, deficiency,requirements, toxicity, contribution of foods to intake anda list of good food sources. There is a final section on fluidbalance.

There are seven chapters that address nutrition throughthe life cycle. The chapter on infants and preschool childrencontains excellent information of on promoting and estab-lishing breastfeeding, although it may have been preferablenot to use the term ‘patient’ in the heading for the FAQ forestablishing breastfeeding. The chapter on special groupsincludes information on a good range of minority ethnicgroups, but with a focus on those most common in the UK.There is information on eating on a low income and policiesfor reducing food poverty. The 20 pages on nutrition inter-ventions in populations highlight food and nutrition policiesat a range of levels, and include a case study, tips for imple-

menting and evaluating policies, and some useful practicalexamples.

The remaining 20 chapters cover clinical nutrition in theexpected range of conditions. There are also perhaps less-expected chapters on palliative care, nutrition in mentalhealth, rheumatology and bone health, and ketogenic diets.The last two very brief chapters address hospital catering andpopular diets. There is a comprehensive 50-page chapter onnutrition support that provides a great deal of information ina concise and accessible form. There is a useful overview ofthe metabolic response to injury, a very good section onrefeeding syndrome and specific sections on critical care,surgery, spinal cord, head and burn injury that will beparticularly useful to nurses, doctors and dietitians notexperienced in these areas of specialist practice.

The currency of the material will apparently be managedby postings on a specific page on the Oxford University Presswebsite. Although there are two different coloured page-mark ribbons, some additional form of marking the differentsections would improve accessibility to the information.Overall, the material is very well presented with many usefulsummary tables and figures. It is likely that dietitians willfind the section(s) that corresponds to their particular spe-ciality areas of practice or expertise to be somewhat limited.However, the implied intention was to provide breadth, notdepth, and conciseness, rather than textbook detail, andwithin these parameters, the publication is excellent. It willbe a very useful tool for nurses, doctors and other health-care professionals, as well as for dietetic students, generalistdietitians and specialists who want access to a concise over-view of areas that are not within the scope of their everydaypractice. This compact, but hefty publication measures10 ¥ 18 ¥ 3 cm and weighs 400 g, and will be a useful ifbulky addition to either pocket or briefcase.

Lynne Daniels, PhD, APDResearch Professor, Institute Health Biomedical Innovation,

School Public Health,Queensland University of Technology,Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia

Book reviews

© 2007 The AuthorsJournal compilation © 2007 Dietitians Association of Australia

218