the - parental decision - fallacy - israel 2014

3

Click here to load reader

Upload: amen-ronald-oberhollenzer

Post on 21-Jul-2016

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

They call themselves "law experts", but are DILETANTS ... they call themselves "Justice" but are UNJUSTICE ...... they are estranged from law reality ... INTENTIONALLY IGNORANT of the Principles of Democracy and the Rule of Law and the inarguable fact that Any Form of Infliction of Non-Accidental Injury on a Child of Any Age and Gender - thus of course any form of medically not warranted circumcision - is OUTLAWED in any True Democratic Rule of Law Jurisdiction! Amen.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The - Parental Decision - FALLACY - Israel 2014
Page 2: The - Parental Decision - FALLACY - Israel 2014

Intactivists THINK before you SPEAK.

A "parental right of decision on MGM" DOES NOT EXIST.

Now you all think "everything is alright" because some "judges" say "it´s up to the parents to

""decide"" whether or not they "wish" to MUTILATE THE CHILD" ___ ...so now you think "everything

is alright" ___ and because you do not think deeper ... also because you do not want to listen to what

I am telling you since oh so long ... you speak as if "now all is well".

But I tell you again that NOTHING IS ALRIGHT.

Fact is: This "court ruling" is a FALLACY, it MISLEADS you all to think "oh, now everything is alright,

because now it is clear that it´s up to the parents to "make their informed decision" ___ ...and you

too believe this FALLACY of a "parental right to make a decision whether or not to inflict preventable

injury on a child" ___

And I tell you again - as so many times in the past - THE TRUTH IS:

NO PARENT has the legal right to inflict or to have inflicted any form of preventable injury on a

child ... because a) infliction of non-accidental injury or any other harm to a child IS ABSOLUTELY

SUBHUMAN!!! (every healthy common sense parent has no problem to agree with me on that one ...

NO healthy common sense parent would ever intentionally inflict preventable injury or any other

harm to the child!!! ___ and b) just as I tell you over and over again in the past years --- >any act of

infliction of non-accidental injury on a child of any age and gender< constitutes the >act of CHILD

ABUSE< under >Federal CAPTA Child Protection Law< and thus is ABSOLUTELY OUTLAWED in every

democratic jurisdiction ... thus also in the USA and ISRAEL!!!

It is HIGH TIME that ALL INTACTIVIST and of course ALL PARENTS finally understand this inarguable

fact, that >a parental right of "make your decision (whether informed of uninformed decision)

DOES NOT EXIST!!!

I tell you again: There are certain LIMITS to what parents are allowed to do ... and one of these

LIMITS is: >Parents DO NOT have the right to inflict preventable injury on a child ... and parents do

also NOT have a right to ""decide"" whether to have the child mutilated or not!!

Page 3: The - Parental Decision - FALLACY - Israel 2014

Again: Such a legal right DOES NOT EXIST!!!

Brit Mila and any other form of Forced Circumcision is already OUTLAWED!

...and it is high time that also intactivists STOP circulating this FALSE and MISLEADING information

"please parents make your informed decision" ___ It is absolutely WRONG to imply that parents

were to have such a right.

Intactivists THINK before you SPEAK and ONLY give CORRECT INFORMATION!

So, while this Supreme Court ""Decision"" looks nice, so as if this were a "decision" for the "benefit of

the child" ... for the "protection of the child" ___ it only "seems to be good" - as this is the hideous

nature of every FALLACY, namely "to appear to be good" ___ BUT only mere "surface thinker" fall

prey to FALLACIES ___ the TRUTH is, that this "court decision" implies that "parents have the right to

decide" ___ which of course is unconstitutional, and DOES NOT constitute any protection of the

CHILD ... DOES NOT PROTECT the CHILD´s RIGHT of PHYSICAL INTEGRITY ... because this "court ruling"

ONLY and fallaciously PROTECTS a "parental right" ... a right that under existing law DOES NOT EXIST!

Conclusion:

What this all in all unconstitutional and hideous, fallacious "court ruling" means, is:

"The CHILDREN are still at the "mercy of their parents", because it wrongly suggests, that "parents

were to have a legal right to "decide" whether or not to mutilate the child ... and that MGM were not

outlawed thus legal ... even if the parents "decide" to mutilate the child or to have it genitally

mutilated."

I know, most of you consider this a "milestone court ruling for the protection of a parental right to

decide" ... BUT by "liking this obviously ludicrous and all in all ANTI-CHILD decision" ... you completely

DISREGARD THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT OF THE CHILD ... because this "decision" in its subhuman

nature DISREGARDS THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT OF THE CHILD of PHYSICAL INTEGRITY and the

CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT OF EQUAL PROTECTION!

Learn in www.intacthumanity.org ... and endorse the Universal Declaration of Demand for Law

Enforcement and its ABC Solution. Amen

Amen Ronald Oberhollenzer - Paternoster

School of Humanity

[email protected]

Intact Humanity.org

Global Symposium for an Intact humanity

[email protected]

www.intacthumanity.org