the pass we are in

24

Upload: kalil

Post on 24-Feb-2016

41 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

THE PASS WE ARE IN. INTERNATIONAL CONVERGENCE THE LCD OF GLOBALIZATION THE IMPERATIVE FOR INNOVATION THE AMBIVALENCE OF EDUCATION THE LIQUEFACTION OF THE STATE THE META-MARKET AND INVESTMENT WHAT ROLE, WHAT FUNDING. PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PRIORITIES. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: THE PASS WE ARE IN
Page 2: THE PASS WE ARE IN

THE PASS WE ARE IN

Page 3: THE PASS WE ARE IN

1. INTERNATIONAL CONVERGENCE2. THE LCD OF GLOBALIZATION3. THE IMPERATIVE FOR INNOVATION4. THE AMBIVALENCE OF EDUCATION5. THE LIQUEFACTION OF THE STATE6. THE META-MARKET AND INVESTMENT7. WHAT ROLE, WHAT FUNDING

Page 4: THE PASS WE ARE IN

GDP TR GDP% R/D TERTUnited States $14.62 3 2 37

China $5.75 10 0 4Japan $5.39 3 3 34

Germany $3.31 3 2 23France $2.56 3 1 23

UK $2.26 1 1 26Italy $2.04 2 1 10

Brazil $2.02 7 1 Canada $1.56 3 2 42Russia $1.48 4 2 20

India $1.43 8 1 7Spain $1.38 -1 1

Australia $1.22 3 2 29Mexico $1.00 5 0 10

Korea, South $0.99 6 3 28NON US AV $2.31 4.07 1.43 21.33

Page 5: THE PASS WE ARE IN

PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PRIORITIES

Page 6: THE PASS WE ARE IN

50 YEARS—DEFINING GENERAL WELFARE THROUGH PUBLIC SPENDING

TO WHAT DEGREE DO WE VALUE EDUCATION?

50% SOCIAL SPEND

Page 7: THE PASS WE ARE IN

50%

3:1

33%

Page 8: THE PASS WE ARE IN

DEFINING HAPPINESS THROUGH HOUSEHOLD SPENDING

Page 9: THE PASS WE ARE IN

FED PRIORITIES

Page 10: THE PASS WE ARE IN

1. RE-ORIENTATION SINCE ’602. TRANSFER OF WEALTH3. ED IS STATE/LCL4. AT FED LEVEL ONLY STUDENT AID IN

PERMANENT BUDGET; 63%....5. OVERALL, ED SHARE STEADY BUT LOW

Page 11: THE PASS WE ARE IN

THE ELASTICITY AND SPECIFICITY OF SUBSIDY

Page 12: THE PASS WE ARE IN

STATE CAPACITY

Page 13: THE PASS WE ARE IN

60-90B

Page 14: THE PASS WE ARE IN

TENURE CA NTN

Moved in 2005 or later 28.5% 27.8%

Moved in 2000 to 2004 29.6% 27.5%

OWE

30.0 to 34.9 percent 10.2% 9.0%

35.0 percent or more 41.4% 27.90%

Page 15: THE PASS WE ARE IN

ED BENEFITS AND CHALLENGES

Page 16: THE PASS WE ARE IN

IS EDUCATION CAPABLE OF CHANGING INEQUALITIES IN WEALTH, HEALTH, ETC? OF ADVANCING ECONOMIC GOOD?

IF NOT OR NOT INTERESTED, WHY SEEK PUBLIC SUBSIDY? AND FROM WHOM? UNLESS FOR NTNL SECURITY, FED CAN BUT WON’T. STATES OUGHT TO BUT CAN’T. THEY AS A RULE DO NOT DEFICIT-FINANCE.

Page 17: THE PASS WE ARE IN

IS EDUCATION CAPABLE OF BRIDGING FROM AN ECONOMY OF SERVICE SECTOR JOBS AND EXCESSIVE CONSUMPTION TO ONE OF KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER AND PRODUCTION? DOUBLE DEGREES?

GLOBALIZATION UPROOTS MANUFACTURING. HATRED OF GOVERNMENT THINS CIVIL SERVICE. THE LIFETIME JOB IS GONE.

Page 18: THE PASS WE ARE IN
Page 19: THE PASS WE ARE IN

% OECD RNKCHILD IN POV 0.2200 HH S COMPLETED 0.5000 L

16 YR OLDS MRS 0.5000 M20 YR OLDS H E 0.3800 L

RESEARCH/1000 0.0090 MRD/GDP 0.0250 LPTNTS/CPTA 0.0060 MLONGEV 0.7800 LOBES 0.3100 HYTH MURDER 0.0001 HMOTOR FATAL 0.0002 HGR IN MANU V 0.0520 M

MANU/EXPORTS 0.8100 MHIGH TECH/EX 0.3400 MGDP 0.0200 MGINI 0.4500 M

Page 20: THE PASS WE ARE IN

CONVERSATION

Page 21: THE PASS WE ARE IN
Page 22: THE PASS WE ARE IN

AGENDA

Page 23: THE PASS WE ARE IN

1. NATIONAL ECONOMIC AND EDUCATION ACT1. ED CORP2. STRATEGIC CAPACITIES AS IN PREVENTATIVE HEALTH

CARE AND BIO TECH3. LITERACIES BROADENED TO REFLECT COG. RESEARCH4. PIPELINE DATA5. 2030 PLAN6. CAP AND WEIGHT GRANTS, LIMIT LOANS

2. STATES1. ALIGN PROPERTY TAXES, INCOME, K12 COST2. ALIGN EXIT AND ENTRY, FROM LEVEL TO LEVEL3. LOCAL COMPACTS4. WEIGHT AID BY PROGRESS5. FUNCTIONALIZE TRANSFER AND GRAD6. ELIMINATE SR AND TENURE; ELEVATE PEER REVIEW;

OPEN SAL SCHEDULES7. PATHWAY COUNCILS

3. UNIVERSITIES1. SELF-FUND 2X DEGREES2. DE-REGULATE BUT HOLD ACCOUNTABLE3. RETHINK THE RELATION OF DEPTS AND DISC.4. LINK CAMPUS PLANS TO REGIONAL NEEDS

Page 24: THE PASS WE ARE IN

4. HERE1. FIND ROOM FOR THE DEBATE2. ORGANIZE DATA AND ARGUMENTS APPROPRIATELY3. DO NOT LEGISLATE FOR ALL TTME4. CLINICAL INDUCTION PARTNERSHIPS5. PATHWAY DATA AND KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER DATA6. DELIVEROLOGY BY ANOTHER NAME7. HS AND STRETCH FOR REMEDIATION8. DOUBLE OUT OF STATE; INCREASE TRANSFER9. WEIGHT AID DEMONSTRABLY10. MATCH REGIONAL NEEDS IN SKILLS11. INTEGRATE, PUBLICIZE, AND QUANTIFY

PREVENTATIVE CLINICS12. INSTITUTE HEALTHY PRACTICES13. TARGET HIS, HSCI, PIPELINE FUNDING14. MODEL 30% STATE FUNDING15. HONOR PRAGMATISM