the pesticide paradox in ipm risk-benefit analysis

29
The pesticide Paradox in IPM Risk-Benefit Analysis

Upload: alison-wheeler

Post on 16-Dec-2015

228 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The pesticide Paradox in IPM Risk-Benefit Analysis

The pesticide Paradox in IPM

Risk-Benefit Analysis

Page 2: The pesticide Paradox in IPM Risk-Benefit Analysis

IPM: is all about compatibility

Page 3: The pesticide Paradox in IPM Risk-Benefit Analysis

Insecticides

Page 4: The pesticide Paradox in IPM Risk-Benefit Analysis

Insecticide Definition

Any substance or mixture of substances intended for preventing, destroying, repelling, or mitigating any pest

(US EPA 2002)

Page 5: The pesticide Paradox in IPM Risk-Benefit Analysis

It has been said in the 30s!

“Biological and chemical control are considered…as the two edges of the same sword…nature’s own balance provides the major part of protection…insecticides should be used so as to interfere with natural control of pests as little as possible”

(Hoskins et al 1939)

Page 6: The pesticide Paradox in IPM Risk-Benefit Analysis

IPM remains compromising between:

• Environmental/human health advocacy

• Industries that need to use insecticides in order to prevent economic lost.

Page 7: The pesticide Paradox in IPM Risk-Benefit Analysis

The impact of pesticides within IPM depends on:

• The pesticide

• The pest

• The management situation

Page 8: The pesticide Paradox in IPM Risk-Benefit Analysis

Pesticides and Cotton

Page 9: The pesticide Paradox in IPM Risk-Benefit Analysis

Boll-weevil eradication program

Page 10: The pesticide Paradox in IPM Risk-Benefit Analysis

Pesticides are compatible with some IPM techniques

• Plowing

• Host-plant resistance

• Physical barriers

Page 11: The pesticide Paradox in IPM Risk-Benefit Analysis

Pesticides and Bio-control

• Natural enemy resistance

Page 12: The pesticide Paradox in IPM Risk-Benefit Analysis

Natural enemies tolerate different insecticides differently

• Variation observed within insecticides classes.

• Differential response of parasitoids versus predators.

Page 13: The pesticide Paradox in IPM Risk-Benefit Analysis

Not only pesticides can interfere with IPM

Bacillus thuringiensisCinnibar moth feeding on tansy ragwood

Gypsy moth

Western Spruce budworm

Page 14: The pesticide Paradox in IPM Risk-Benefit Analysis

• Fungicides and herbicides might affect natural enemies

Page 15: The pesticide Paradox in IPM Risk-Benefit Analysis

Fungicides and Bio-control

Page 16: The pesticide Paradox in IPM Risk-Benefit Analysis

Sub-lethal effects

• Natural enemies might produce

fewer viable eggs.

• Repellent effects

Page 17: The pesticide Paradox in IPM Risk-Benefit Analysis

Colorado potato beetle and Colorado potato beetle and Beauveria bassianaBeauveria bassiana

Page 18: The pesticide Paradox in IPM Risk-Benefit Analysis

Purple loosetrife, beetles and mosquitoes

Purple loosetrife Galerucella sp

Page 19: The pesticide Paradox in IPM Risk-Benefit Analysis

Water Hyacinth weevils and herbicides

Page 20: The pesticide Paradox in IPM Risk-Benefit Analysis

Insecticides are one of the four Insecticides are one of the four building blocks of IPMbuilding blocks of IPM

Ch

emic

alC

hem

ical

Bio

log

ical

Bio

log

ical

Cu

ltu

ral

Cu

ltu

ral

Pla

nt

resi

stan

ceP

lan

t re

sist

ance

IPMIPM

Page 21: The pesticide Paradox in IPM Risk-Benefit Analysis
Page 22: The pesticide Paradox in IPM Risk-Benefit Analysis

Improving pesticide selectivity

• Timing e.g. Apply before the arrival of natural enemies

• Placement e.g. Apply in first two thirds of plant only. Apply insecticide to the middle of every other row.

Pesticide application just next to seed.

Page 23: The pesticide Paradox in IPM Risk-Benefit Analysis

Refuge!

Page 24: The pesticide Paradox in IPM Risk-Benefit Analysis

Pesticides formulation might make a difference!

• Dust is more toxic to beneficials than wetable powders or emulsifiable concentrates.

Page 25: The pesticide Paradox in IPM Risk-Benefit Analysis

Pesticides formulation might make a difference!

• Granular applications of certain pesticides do not reduce the number of natural enemies in certain crops but foliar applications of the same pesticide might cause substantial reductions.

Page 26: The pesticide Paradox in IPM Risk-Benefit Analysis

Pesticides formulation might make a difference!

• Systemic pesticides will

protect some natural

enemies as well.

Page 27: The pesticide Paradox in IPM Risk-Benefit Analysis

Pheromones are a good way to incorporate insecticide use in IPM

Page 28: The pesticide Paradox in IPM Risk-Benefit Analysis

The greatest treath to many IPM programs is the misapplication of

pesticides

Page 29: The pesticide Paradox in IPM Risk-Benefit Analysis