the poetics of space

6

Click here to load reader

Upload: diana-ioja

Post on 27-Sep-2015

17 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

The Poetics of Space

TRANSCRIPT

  • The Poetics of Space by Gaston Bachelard

    Joan Ockman

    But any doctrine of the imaginary is necessarily a philosophy of excess.1

    Three or four decades ago a book entitled The Poetics of Space could hardly fail to stir

    the architectural imagination. First published in French in 1957 and translated into

    English in 1964, Gaston Bachelards philosophical meditation on oneiric space appeared

    at a moment when phenomenology and the pursuit of symbolic and archetypal meanings

    in architecture seemed to open fertile ground within the desiccated culture of late

    modernism. We are far removed from any reference to simple geometrical forms,

    Bachelard wrote in a chapter entitled House and Universe. A house that has been

    experienced is not an inert box. Inhabited space transcends geometrical space.2 In lyrical

    chapters on the topography of our intimate beingof nests, drawers, shells, corners,

    miniatures, forests, and above all the house, with its vertical polarity of cellar and attic

    he undertook a systematic study, or topoanalysis, of the space we love. Although

    Bachelard was specifically concerned with the psychodynamics of the literary image,

    architects saw in his excavation of the spatial imaginary a counter to both technoscientific

    positivism and abstract formalism, as well as an alternative to the schematicism of the

    other emerging intellectual tendency of the day, structuralism. In his book Existence,

    Space and Architecture (1971), Christian Norberg-Schulz, the most prolific and long-

    term proponent of a phenomenological architecture, asserted that further research on

    architectural space is dependent upon a better understanding of existential space, citing

    Bachelards Poetics of Space together with Otto Friedrich Bollnows Mensch und

    Raum (1963), the chapter on space in Maurice Merleau-Pontys The Phenomenology of

    Perception(1962; original French, 1945), and two key works by Martin Heidegger, Being

    and Time (1962; German, 1927) and the essay Building Dwelling Thinking (1971;

    German, 1954), as fundamental texts.3

    Yet if Bachelards phenomenological orientation was already evident before the Second

    World War, the philosophy of sciencethe subject of his initial formationremained a

    central preoccupation throughout his career. To read only The Poetics of Space is

    therefore to miss his originality with respect to the philosophical tradition from which he

    emerged, as well as the historical specificity of his development. One must consider his

    work on the creative imagination together with his writings on science and rationality to

    appreciate the dialectic that informs his thought. Indeed, in a rereading of Bachelard

    today, it is the interrelationship between science and poetry, experiment and experience,

    that seems to have the most radical potential, while his well-known vision of the oneiric

    house, with its rather nostalgic and essentialist world view, comes across as historically

    dated.

    In his own time, Bachelard (18841962) was a remarkable intellectual figure, reputedly a

    reader of six books a day, and author of twenty-three at the time of his death, not

  • counting his scores of essays, prefaces, and posthumous fragments. At the Sorbonne,

    where he occupied the chair of history and philosophy of science from 1940 to 1955, he

    was a beloved pedagogue whose flowing beard, earthy accents, and elevated flights of

    thought made him something of a guru. Born into a family of modest shopkeepers and

    shoemakers in a provincial town in the idyllic countryside of Champagne about 200 miles

    southeast of Paris, he initially intended to pursue a career in engineering. After three

    years in the trenches of the First World War, however, he changed his sights to

    philosophy, eventually moving to Paris, where he obtained a doctorate from the Sorbonne

    in 1927 with two dissertations, one on the acquisition of scientific knowledge by

    approximation and the other on the thermodynamics of solids. Over the next decade he

    produced eight more volumes dealing with the epistemology of knowledge in various

    sciences, becoming increasingly preoccupied with the dangers of a priori thinking and

    questions of objectivity and experimental evidence. In LExprience de lespace dans la

    physique contemporaine(1937), confronting the philosophical implications of Einsteins

    monumental breakthrough in physics and Heisenbergs uncertainty principle, Bachelard

    took up the contradictions between Descartess and Newtons concepts of physical space

    as empirical, locational, and stable, and the abstract, counterexperiential constructs of

    space-time being theorized by 20th-century microphysics.

    But Bachelards inquiry into the revolutionary character of the new scientific mind little

    prepared his colleagues for the unconventional turn his work was to take at the end of the

    1930s. Influenced by psychoanalysis and surrealism, two books, The Psychoanalysis of

    Fire (1938) and Lautramont (1939), signaled a shift in his focus from physical science

    to the phenomena of consciousness, from the axis of objectivization to that of

    subjectivity. With The Psychoanalysis of Firea book in which Bachelard set out to

    question everything, to escape from the rigidity of mental habits formed by contact

    with familiar experiences4he initiated a series of investigations into the psychic

    meanings of the four cosmic elements, conceived as constituting the repertory of poetic

    reverie, the material imagination. The project of discerning a loi des quatre

    lments would preoccupy him until his death, resulting in a suite of remarkable volumes

    on fire, earth, air, and water.5 In Lautramont,another excursion into the domain of depth

    psychologymore Jungian than Freudian, as noted by Deleuze and Guattari, admirers of

    the book6Bachelard set out to study the phenomenology of aggression in the wild,

    animalizing imagery of the 19th-century Uruguayan poet Isidore Ducasse, author

    of Les Chants de Maldoror, one of the sacred texts of the surrealists (and later of the

    Cobra group, on whom Bachelard was to be deeply influential).

    As Bachelard acknowledged in The Psychoanalysis of Fire, The axes of poetry and of

    science are opposed to one another from the outset. All that philosophy can hope to

    accomplish is to make poetry and science complementary, to unite them as two well-

    defined opposites.7 Yet what profoundly links Bachelards philosophy of knowledge to

    his poetics of the imagination, his scientific epistemology to his study of psychic

    phenomena, is his concern with how creative thought comes into being. Like Michel

  • Foucault after him (and anticipating Thomas Kuhns notion of the paradigm shift),

    Bachelard directed epistemological inquiry away from the continuities within systems of

    knowledge toward the obstacles and events that interrupt the continuum, thereby forcing

    new ideas to appear and altering the course of thought. Bachelards concept of the

    epistemological obstaclea concept Foucault would assimilate inThe Archaeology of

    Knowledgewas an attempt to demonstrate how knowledge incorporates its own history

    of errors and divagations. The epistemological profile of any scientific idea included

    the multiple obstacles that had to be negated or transcended dialecticallyand thus

    absorbedin the process of arriving at more rational levels of knowledge. Countering the

    codification of universal systems of thought and the formation of collective mentalities,

    as Foucault would put it, were events and thresholds that suspended the linear

    advancement of knowledge, forcing thought into discontinuous rhythms and transforming

    or displacing concepts along novel avenues of inquiry.8 For Bachelard as for Foucault,

    such epistemological obstacles played a crucial and creative function in the history of

    thought. Scientific inquiry therefore had to remain nonteleological and open to the

    possibility of such reorderings and reversals. In this way, modern rationalism would be a

    transcendent rationalism, surrationalism. If one doesnt put ones reason at stake in an

    experiment, writes Bachelard in Le Surrationalisme (1936), the experiment is not

    worth attempting.9

    For Bachelard, the role played by the epistemological obstacle in experimental science is

    exactly paralleled by that of the poetic image in literary language. In Bachelards view,

    the authentically poetic image emerges from a form of forgetting or not-knowing that is

    not ignorance but a difficult transcendence of knowledge. As such, it constantly

    surpasses its origins. Hence, neither history nor psychology can ever fully determine or

    explain it. As he puts it in The Poetics of Spaceunderscoring the irony in the title of his

    earlier book on firethe problem with psychoanalysis (just as with Marxist

    interpretations of history) is that it seeks to explain the flower by the fertilizer.10 For

    Bachelard, the poetic image has no past; it is not under the sway of some inner drive,

    nor is it a measure of the pressures the poet sustains in the course of his early life . The

    trait proper to the image is suddenness and brevity: it springs up in language like the

    sudden springing forth of language itself.11 Bachelards notion of the role played by

    chance and mutability in the emergence of the poetic image is virtually identical to the

    creative principle of the surrealists. For Bachelard, surrealism is related to realism as

    surrationalism is to rationalism.

    Explicit in his ontology of the poetic image, as in surrealist literature and art, is a critique

    of the ocular privilege accorded by Enlightenment philosophy to geometry and visual

    evidence. Despite its perceptual sophistication, the eye cannot necessarily go beyond a

    description of surface: Sight says too many things at the same time. Being does not see

    itself. Perhaps it listens to itself.12 Space, for Bachelard, is not primarily a container of

    three-dimensional objects. For this reason the phenomenology of dwelling has little to do

    with an analysis of architecture or design as such: it is not a question of describing

  • houses, or enumerating their picturesque features and analyzing for which reasons they

    are comfortable.13Rather, space is the abode of human consciousness, and the problem

    for the phenomenologist is to study how it accommodates consciousnessor the half-

    dreaming consciousness Bachelard calls reverie. In this sense, any application of

    Bachelards ideas to architecture requires a cautious approach at best. Indeed, Bachelard

    would undoubtedly argue that almost everything we know about architecture as a

    historical discipline stands in the way of everything we can know about the poetics of

    dwelling.

    But precisely from the standpoint of clinging to traditional modes of thought, Bachelards

    vision of the oneiric houseinfluential as it has been on a certain sector of architectural

    discourse since the 60sitself seems to constitute a blind spot or epistemological

    obstacle. His radical will to question all received ideas and experience, his concept of the

    dynamism of the creative imagination, and his post-Newtonian philosophy of science

    contradict a conception of dwelling rooted in the soil of the preindustrial French

    countryside. It is no coincidence that Bachelard first evokes this atavistic dream world

    a house that comes forth from the earth, that lives rooted in its black earthin his

    book La Terre et les rveries du repos, published in 1948, just after the Second World

    War.14 Bachelards recourse to the poetics of felicitous space would seem to be a way

    of countering an encroaching modernity. His antipathy to 20th-century urbanism and

    technology receives its strongest expression inThe Poetics of Space:

    In Paris there are no houses, and the inhabitants of the big city live in superimposed

    boxes . They have no roots and, what is quite unthinkable for a dweller of houses,

    skyscrapers have no cellars. From the street to the roof, the rooms pile up one on top of

    the other, while the tent of a horizonless sky encloses the entire city. But the height of

    city buildings is a purely exterior one. Elevators do away with the heroism of stair

    climbing so that there is no longer any virtue in living up near the sky. Home has become

    mere horizontality. The different rooms that compose living quarters jammed into one

    floor all lack one of the fundamental principles for distinguishing and classifying the

    values of intimacy.

    But in addition to the intimate nature of verticality, a house in a big city lacks cosmicity.

    For here, where houses are no longer set in natural surroundings, the relationship between

    house and space becomes an artificial one. Everything about it is mechanical and, on

    every side, intimate living flees.15

    Bachelards evocation of the rustic abode in Champagne is almost exactly contemporary

    with Heideggers paean to the peasant hut in the Black Forest.16 Henri Lefebvre, who

    admired both philosophers, was among the first to point out the shared aura of nostalgia

    that suffuses their poetics of dwelling. The special, still sacred, quasi-religious and in

    fact almost absolute space that both Bachelard and Heidegger associate with the idea of

    house reflects the terrible urban reality that the twentieth century has instituted.17 The

    reverie of a maternal, womblike, and stable home, sheltering and remote, is, as Anthony

  • Vidler has suggested more recently,18 a symptomatic response to the experience of

    an unheimlich modernity.

    From this perspective, the work of Foucault beginsconsciouslywhere Bachelard

    leaves off. Instead of Bachelards timeless reverie of felicitous space, Foucault prefers to

    confront the coefficient of adversity in the phenomenology of human habitation,

    addressing questions of historicity and power in relation to spatial discourse and

    institutions. The Poetics of Space thus leads, at least by one route, to Foucaults seminal

    essay of 1967 on heterotopia, in which Foucault suggestively proposes to shift the

    problematic of Bachelardian topoanalysis from intimate space to other spacesspaces

    of crisis, deviance, exclusion, and illusion; in other words, to heterotopoanalysis.19

    1. Gaston Bachelard, The Poetics of Space, trans. Maria Jolas (Boston: Beacon Press, 1969), 210.

    2. Ibid., 47.

    3. Christian Norberg-Schulz, Existence, Space and Architecture (New York: Praeger, 1972), 1516.

    4. Gaston Bachelard, The Psychoanalysis of Fire, trans. Alan C. M. Ross (Boston: Beacon Press, 1964), 1, 6.

    5. Following La Psychanalyse du feu, Bachelards books on the cosmic imagination are LEau et les rves.Essai sur

    limagination de la matire (1942; English trans., Water and Dreams: An Essay on the Imagination of Matter,

    1983); LAir et les songes: Essai sur limagination du mouvement (1943; trans., Air and Dreams: An Essay on the

    Imagination of Movement, 1988); La Terre et les rveries de la volont(1948); La Terre et les rveries du

    repos (1948); La Flamme dune chandelle (1961; trans., The Flame of a Candle, 1988); and Fragments dune

    potique du feu (posthumous, 1988). The Poetics of Space is properly part of this series, the house belonging to the

    earthly element of the cosmos. Two more related worksLa Potique de la rverie (1960; trans.,The Poetics of

    Reverie: Childhood, Language, and the Cosmos, 1969) and Le Droit de rver (posthumous, 1970; trans., The Right

    to Dream, 1971)complete the list of Bachelards books on the phenomenology of the imagination.

    6. Gilles Deleuze and Flix Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, trans. Brian Massumi

    (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987), 235236.

    7. The Psychoanalysis of Fire, 2.

    8. Michel Foucault, The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language, trans. A. M. Sheridan Smith

    (New York: Pantheon, 1972), 4.

    9. Cit. in Denis Hollier, ed., The College of Sociology, 193739, trans. Betsy Wing (Minneapolis: University of

    Minnesota Press, 1988), 397, n.2.

    10. The Poetics of Space, xxvi, xxviiixxix.

    11. Maurice Blanchot, The Infinite Conversation, trans. Susan Hanson (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press,

    1993), 320321.

    12. The Poetics of Space, 215. Cit. in Martin Jay, Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century

    French Thought (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994), 388, n.29.

    13. The Poetics of Space, 4.

    14. Gaston Bachelard, The Oneiric House, trans. Joan Ockman, in Joan Ockman with Edward Eigen,

    ed.,Architecture Culture 19431968: A Documentary Anthology (New York: Rizzoli, 1993), 111.

    15. The Poetics of Space, 2627. Bachelards italics.

  • 16. See Martin Heidegger, Building Dwelling Thinking, in Poetry, Language, Thought, trans. Albert Hofstadter

    (New York: Harper & Row, 1975), 160.

    17. Henri Lefebvre, The Production of Space, trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1991), 120

    121.

    18. Anthony Vidler, The Architectural Uncanny: Essays on the Modern Unhomely (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1992),

    6366. For a feminist reading along similar lines, suggesting that the dream of dwelling in the bosom of the house

    is a male fantasy not shared by most women (for whom the house is more a place of labor than repose), see Sharon

    Haar and Christopher Reed, Coming Home: A Postscript on Postmodernism, in Christopher Reed, ed., Not at

    Home: The Suppression of Domesticity in Modern Art and Architecture (London: Thames and Hudson, 1996), 257

    258.

    19. The coefficient of adversity is Bachelards term; see Water and Dreams, p. 157. Foucaults essay, Of Other

    Spaces: Utopias and Heterotopias, is republished in Architecture Culture, 1943-1968, 419-426. As this article was

    going to press, I came across Edward S. Caseys illuminating philosophical history, The Fate of Place(University of

    California Press, 1997), which situates Bachelards Poetics of Space in the broad context of Western philosophical

    discourse on the concept of place.

    Joan Ockman teaches history and theory at the Columbia University Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and

    Preservation. Michel Fo