the presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred...

37
SIMULATION DEBRIEFING ISN’T ALWAYS AT THE END! WESTMORELAND COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE, YOUNGWOOD, PA Ruth E. Irwin, MSN, RN Pauline Freedberg, MSN, RN Carie Shedlock, MSN, RN Kathleen A. Malloy, PhD, RN

Upload: herbert-sheerer

Post on 15-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation. WCCC. 2012

SIMULATION DEBRIEFING ISN’T ALWAYS AT THE END!

WESTMORELAND COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE, YOUNGWOOD, PA

Ruth E. Irwin, MSN, RNPauline Freedberg, MSN, RN

Carie Shedlock, MSN, RNKathleen A. Malloy, PhD, RN

Page 2: The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation. WCCC. 2012

WCCC. 2012

Disclosure

The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation.

Page 3: The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation. WCCC. 2012

Objectives

Recognize that debriefing during simulation does not always have to be at the end.

List the benefits of using in-simulation debriefing during a student nurse simulation scenario.

Describe a teaching strategy designed to improve learning outcomes and decrease stress and anxiety during a student nurse simulation scenario.

Page 4: The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation. WCCC. 2012

Quick Survey …

When you first started learning about Simulation what were you told?

What education did you receive? What did you hear about debriefing? Did you get enough information on

debriefing? The Simulation Model - a review

Page 5: The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation. WCCC. 2012

(Jeffries & Rizzolo, 2006)

Page 6: The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation. WCCC. 2012

Faculty Role of Simulation Facilitator

Simulations are student centered

Experiential Learning Experience

Page 7: The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation. WCCC. 2012

Faculty as Simulation Facilitator

Debriefing – the activity that follows a simulation experience led by a facilitator wherein feedback is provided on the simulation participants’ performance while positive aspects of the completed simulation are discussed and reflective thinking encouraged (NLN-SIRC, 2010)

Simulation Innovation Resource Center (SIRC)

Page 8: The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation. WCCC. 2012

Faculty as Simulation Facilitator

Guided Reflection – the process encouraged by the instructor during debriefing that reinforces the critical aspects of the experience and encourages insightful learning allowing the participant to link theory with practice and research (NLN-SIRC, 2010).

Page 9: The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation. WCCC. 2012

Key to Success!

Faculty must: be comfortable with the topic be prepared comfortable with self acceptance of deviations from the planned

scenario

Equal Time spent in the Simulation Scenario and Debriefing

Page 10: The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation. WCCC. 2012

Steps in the Debriefing Process

ROLE OF EVALUATOR Testing purposes Observer

ROLE OF FACILITATOR

Provide Support Cues

ask questions what if?

Teaching Simulation Guide Debriefing @

end or during phases of the simulation

Page 11: The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation. WCCC. 2012

Reflection

Reflection is a Conscious, Self- Evaluation that Connects Theory to Clinical

It is the opportunity to self-assess their actions, decisions, communication, and deal with the unexpected.

Page 12: The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation. WCCC. 2012

Prep Questions to lead and focus on objectives of the simulation

Guided by Carper’s Fundamental Patterns of Knowing in Nursing: Empirical Aesthetic Personal Ethical

(Jeffries, 2007; Johns, 1995)

Page 13: The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation. WCCC. 2012

EmpiricalWhat knowledge did you have that

assisted you in this scenario?

AestheticWhat was a priority for you? Patient Problem Goal for simulation

PersonalHow did you feel in this scenario?What factors were influencing you?

EthicsWhat personal values or beliefs

influenced your actions today?

Page 14: The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation. WCCC. 2012

Simulation Debriefing Isn’t Always at the End!

Page 15: The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation. WCCC. 2012

SIM MAN is Here…Now What?

Page 16: The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation. WCCC. 2012

Intravenous Medications• Vasoactiv

e drug titration

• Protocols • Fluid

challenges

Hemodynamic Monitoring• Oxygen

administration

• Basic parameters (arterial line, CVP)

Shock State• Assessme

nt• Treatment

strategies• Evaluatio

n

Apply Theory to Clinical Practice

Page 17: The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation. WCCC. 2012

Embrace the Monster!

Click icon to add picture

Page 18: The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation. WCCC. 2012

Boy, Was I Wrong!▀ “Causes more frustration

than is helpful.”▀ “Reinforces student

inadequacies.”▀ “3 hours of lecture is not

enough time for us to know what to do in a situation simulating real life.”

▀ “Showed our deficient knowledge.”

▀ “Watching students not know what to do is not very helpful.”

Page 19: The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation. WCCC. 2012

How Do You Eat an Elephant?

Page 20: The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation. WCCC. 2012

One Bite At A Time

Page 21: The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation. WCCC. 2012

Less Stress and Anxiety?▀ “I didn’t feel threatened or scared because I had

the help of the entire class. It was conducive to learning because when you get nervous, you forget things.”

▀ “Better learning experience when instructor is involved and asking questions, like, what are you thinking you should do now?”

▀ “Liked the group collaboration, it was less stressful and more conducive to learning.”

▀ “I think it was a really good learning experience because it was nice we were not put on the spot, especially when having to think about what needed to be done next.”

Page 22: The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation. WCCC. 2012

Taming the Lion

Page 23: The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation. WCCC. 2012

Debriefing: Making Thinking and Learning Skills Visible

http://www.teachingexpertise.com/e-bulletins/effective-debriefing-making-thinking-and-learning-skills-visible-7895

Page 24: The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation. WCCC. 2012

Reflective Debriefing: Design and Benefits

Prebriefing “Redoing a skill” Facilitator

demonstration “Rescue” Teachable moments “Expect the

unexpected”

Page 25: The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation. WCCC. 2012

Example: Prebriefing

DVD clip from the beginning of Shock Sim Scenario 1/12; Shows PreSim Setup – about 4 minutes.

Page 26: The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation. WCCC. 2012

Reflective Debriefing: Design and Benefits

Prebriefing “Redoing a skill” Facilitator

demonstration “Rescue” Teachable moments “Expect the

unexpected”

Page 27: The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation. WCCC. 2012
Page 28: The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation. WCCC. 2012

Reflective Debriefing: Design and Benefits

Prebriefing “Redoing a skill” Facilitator

demonstration “Rescue” Teachable moments “Expect the

unexpected”

Page 29: The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation. WCCC. 2012

In Summary: GENERAL PRINCIPLES TO FOLLOW IN DEBRIEFING :

 

Debriefing should be learner-centric Build a challenging yet safe environment Debriefing points are derived through setting appropriate

objectives which drive the process If using in-scenario debriefing spend time up front

explaining what will occur Debriefing should enhance learning Debriefing should increase understanding Identifies best practices Promotes safe, quality patient care Promotes knowledge transfer

 (Material supported by International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and

Learning. Published by Elsevier)

Page 30: The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation. WCCC. 2012

If used for evaluation,Debriefing should…

Follow standardized format and scoring and be appropriate to the level of fidelity (low to high) in order to achieve participant outcomes

Have predetermined parameters for terminating the scenario before its completion

Should be held in familiar environment for participants

Scenario should be achievable within appropriate time frame

Incorporate evidence-based practice Students should have been previously

presented/tested for content

Page 31: The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation. WCCC. 2012

 Nursing Skill Development and Clinical Judgment Model

 

Clinical Judgment

Psychomotor Skills

Page 32: The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation. WCCC. 2012

FACULTY OBJECTIVES IN DEBRIEFING

Be Real Correct a limited amount of errors Don’t beat a dead horse Encourage self-critique Constructively correct behaviors,

attitudes & actions that hamper performance

Foster self-reflection, trust, open communication & confidentiality

Use Evidence-Based debriefing methodologies

Page 33: The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation. WCCC. 2012

DETRACTING FACTORS DURING IN-PATIENT SCENARIO:

 Lack of upfront explanation & purpose

Autocratic attitude Not recognizing students’ emotions Yes/no answers Excessive instruction Putting too much in simulation

scenario

Page 34: The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation. WCCC. 2012

ReferencesDismukes, R., Gaba, D., and Howard, S. (2006). So many roads: Facilitated debriefing in healthcare. Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society

for Simulation in Healthcare, 1(1), 23-25.

Dreifuerst, K. (2009). The essentials of debriefing in simulation learning: A concept analysis. Nursing Education Perspectives. Retrieved December 12, 2011 from, http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb3317/is_2_30/ai_n31637216/

Fanning, R. (2007). The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 2(1), 1-10.

INACSL Board of Directors (2011). Standards of Best Practice: Simulation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 7 (S1).

http://www.nursingsimulation.org/issues?issue_key=S1876- 1399%2811%29X0005-1

Jeffries, P. R. (2005). A framework for designing, implementing, and evaluating simulations used as teaching strategies in nursing. Nursing Education Perspectives, 26(2), 96-103.

Page 35: The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation. WCCC. 2012

References Jeffries, P. R., & Rizzolo, M. A. (2006). Designing and implementing models for the innovative use of simulation to teach nursing care of ill adults and children: A national, multi-site, multi-method study. Summary Report, New York, New York: National League for Nursing Retrieved from

http://www.nln.org/research/LaerdalReport.pdf

Jeffries, P. R. (2007). Simulation in nursing education: From conceptualization to evaluation. New York: National League for Nursing.

Johns, C. (1995). Framing learning through reflection within Carper’s fundamental ways of knowing in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 22(2), 226-234.

Larew, C., Lessans, S., Spunt, D., Foster, D., & and Covington, B. G. (2006). Innovations in clinical simulation application of Benner's theory in an interactive patient care simulation. Nursing Education Perspectives, 27(1), 16-21. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com.authenticate.library.duq.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?hid

=108&sid=1fe0fb0a616e-4165-8e62-5b32aae087ad%40sessionmgr111&vid=2

Page 36: The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation. WCCC. 2012

References

National League for Nursing Simulation Innovation Resource Center (NLN- SIRC). (2010). SIRC glossary. Retrieved January 19, 2012 from

http://sirc.nln.org/mod/glossary/view.php?id=183

Rudolph, J., Simon, R. Dufresne, R., and Raemer, D. (2006). There’s no such thing as “nonjudgmental” debriefing: A theory and method for debriefing with good judgment. Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 1 (1), 49-55.

Van Heukelom, J., Begaz, T., and Treat, R. (2010). Comparison of postsimulation debriefing versus in-simulation debriefing in medical simulation. Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 5 (2), 91-97.

Page 37: The presenters have no affiliation or financial interest in any of the content or equipment referred to in this presentation. WCCC. 2012