the race of genesis 10 by william finck

8/16/2019 The Race of Genesis 10 by William Finck

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-race-of-genesis-10-by-william-finck 1/22



fro" the land of the Jood and in that "anner escaping destruction yet any ofthese have no de$nite history which is !nown to us today.

It is certainly no "ista!e that as it "ay be "ade evident here so "any of thetribes listed in Genesis 10 are found with na"es so si"ilar to those gleaned fro"the earliest secular records of our race. lthough it is frustrating that so"e of the

Genesis chapter 10 people see" to have vanished at an early ti"e too early tobe identi$ed in secular records uncovered thus far % that I have been able toaccess % surely enough of these peoples "ay be identi$ed that one "ay see thetruth of these words concerning Genesis chapter 10 fully de"onstrated.

cts 1ULVU nd hath "ade of one blood all nations of "en for to dwell on all theface of the earth and hath deter"ined the ti"es before appointed and thebounds of their habitationC FXYZ.

Peuterono"y KLUR[\U When the Eost ]igh divided to the nations their

inheritance when ]e separated the sons of da" ]e set the bounds of thepeople according to the nu"ber of the children of Israel. ôr _ahweh(s portion is]is people Yacob is the lot of ]is inheritance.C

`cripture "ust always be understood within the conte&t of other scripture and socts 1ULV "ust be viewed through the $lter provided at Peuterono"y KLUR.#ven "ost Bible cross[references relate these two verses. ]ere it should beco"eevident that whenever the Bible discusses the nationsC it intends only thosenations descended fro" Noah listed in Genesis chapter 10 and originally all ofthose nations were of the sa"e race. n e&a"ple of the ti"es before appointedC

in relation to the Genesis chapter 10 nations is found at Yere"iah MVU1 wherethe i"plication is that #gypt was $nished as a nation and although in Ho"anti"es the Gree!s in #gypt "aintained a high level of civiliQation for severalcenturies history surely proves Yere"iah correct concerning the #gyptiansthe"selves. nother e&a"ple lies in Paniel chapter L and the vision of asuccession of world e"pires given there along with the parallel vision describedin Paniel chapter .

ìnce these nations as we shall see were dispersed into a wide geographicalarea reading Peuterono"y KLUR along with II à". U10 indicates that a good

deal of land was reserved uninhabited by _ahweh to be eventually used by thechildren of Israel. It is also clear that this land is outside of alaestine. ncienthistory and archaeology reveal that the Israelites eventually settled "uch of#urope. Before one can understand the i"portance of the pro"ise ofpreservation Foften translated salvationC for Israel uttered in "any places in theOld Testa"ent one "ust understand the history and fate of the rest of thesenations of da" which are listed in Genesis chapter 10.



The Japhethites: Genesis 10:2-5

Go"er FGenesis 10UL. Picult to docu"ent the historian Yosephus "ade the"ista!e of associating Go"er with the Xelts an error probably derived fro" anearly Gree! na"e for the" /<<*/;/ and "any of his copyists have followed this"ista!e which is based solely upon this phonetic si"ilarity. That the Xelts

actually sprung fro" a portion of the children of Israel deported by the ssyriansFsee Missing Links Discovered in Assrian Ta!lets by #. Hay"ond apt is evident

fro" "any factors including their late Fth century B.. appearance in historytheir location today and their role in history in ful$ll"ent of "any of theprophecies concerning IsraelU a topic beyond the scope of this discussion. ì"plynote that the GalatiansC of aul(s epistle are Xelts and aul certainly was writingto Israelites which the contents of that epistle proves. By contrast in #Qe!ielchapter KR Go"er is allied with those who are in opposition to the children ofIsrael which "a!es it easy to accept . Xoestler(s state"ents concerning

Togar"ah outlined below. ò"e co""entators feel that ]osea(s ta!ing of a wifena"ed Go"er F]os. 1UK is an indication that Go"er was one of the tribes thatthe Israelites were dispersed a"ong after their deportation by the ssyrians. Thishypothesis is 'uite credible though I have not been able to positively identify anytribe of the secular records with Go"er. Go"er is not found in ssyrianinscriptions. It can be established that Xhu"ri the ssyrian na"e for the childrenof Israel who" they deported into northern Eesopota"ia is the source for theGree! na"e /<<*/;/ or Xi""erians.

The sons of Go"er FGenesis 10UK. rthur Xoestler a ew who writes fro" a

ewish perspective clai"s that Togar"ah is the co""on ancestor of the igurPursu vars ]uns Basilii Tarnia!h XhaQars Fsee ush below agora Bulgarsand àbir on p. L of his boo! The Thirteenth Tri!e. In Biblical prophecy it isseen that along with Go"er Togar"ah is allied against the children of Israel in thelast days at #Qe!iel KRUV where he is placed in the far north and surely a"ongthe siatic hordes of the for"er òviet nion. Hiphath or Piphath isun"entioned elsewhere in the Bible e&cept for a copy of Genesis chapter 10found at I hronicles chapter 1. sh!enaQ however is "ore easily identi$ed.Eentioned at Yere"iah 1UL along with rarat and Einni Fboth part of "odern

r"enia sh!enaQ is there shown to be not far fro" the ancient land of theXhaQars once a great e"pire and of which "odern XaQa!hstan is a re"nant. Inthe $rst "illenniu" P "any of the #do"ites and other anaanites who hadadopted Yudais" "igrated to XhaQaria and the XhaQars beginning with their !inghad converted to Yudais". The ews being absorbed into the general populationthese people adopted the na"e sh!enaQ or sh!enaQi ewsC for sh!enaQ was



recogniQed by these ews as an ancestor of the original aucasian population ofthe area.

Now if we separate the clai"s of the "edieval ews who" Xoestler 'uoted fro"the Biblical account and the archaeological records there is "uch less that can beused to identify these people with certainty. It is not clear fro" any original

records that Xoestler ]einrich GraetQ who wrote these things over a hundredyears before hi" or any of the other older ews that they 'uote are fully correct. The ryan people of the teppe who" the #do"ite ews "ingled with in XhaQariacertainly had a Eesopota"ian origin but originally could have been fro" one or"ore of the Yaphethite or `he"ite tribes.

Eagog Tubal and Eeshech FGenesis 10UL. Over 100 years before the Ger"anicHus con'uered the land which bears their na"e today #Qe!iel wrote of HhosFjkk or Hosh FET being the leader FprinceC of Gog Eeshech and Tubal F#Qe!ielchapter KR. This is by no "eans a coincidence but rather a clear "anifestation

of the Pivine inspiration of the prophet.

In light of the relationship which the Hus were to have with Eagog Eeshech and Tubal which #Qe!iel chapter KR illustrates ]erodotus "entions two tribes a"ongthose under ersian do"inion the Eoschi and the Tibareni FK.\M .R in aconvenient geographic location that without stretching the i"agination we "ayassociate these ancient Yaphethites with the dwellers around the Hussian cities ofEoscow and Tobols!. `trabo discussed the Eoschi and the Tibareni in hiseleventh boo! and relates that land for"erly held by the Eoschi who" he placed ust south of olchis in the aucasus "ountains was encroached upon by theolchians r"enians and Iberians F11.L.1R. Of course the Iberians are ]ebrewsa part of the `cythians who stayed put rather than "oving northward through theaucasus or westward through natolia with their fellows and r"enia can beshown to be a ]ebrew word "eaning "ountain partsC.

Whoever Eagog "ay have been in prehistoric ti"es we can be certain that hisdescendants are found a"ong those gigantic FGogC "i&ed "asses of aucasian% Eongol % hinese % whatever blood who are found inhabiting "uch of siaticHussia today which the ancient XhaQars also were a part of. Eongolia and Tibet

ho"es of anciently "i&ed races with a clear da"ic cultural inJuence "ay beguessed. rofessor j. . Waddell who wrote in the $rst 'uarter of the L0th century produced several boo!s which illustrated the ryan origin of cultures inIndia and in Tibet.

The conte"porary Hussian archaeologist `.. Grigoryev in papers such as The

Sintashta "ulture and Some #uestions of $ndo%Europeans &rigins and other wor!shas de"onstrated that the archaeological re"ains of the steppe did not co"e



]ebrew word FK1L0 as 429 FIuan. This is not out of fancy for on theBehistun Hoc! Fand other #astern inscriptions these Gree!s are called _avanaCand `ir ]enry Hawlinson wrote IoniansC there in his fa"ous translation of thatinscription. Other ersian inscriptions assure this sa"e connection Fsee G.Eoore(s The Lost Tri!es( and #. H. apt(s Missing Links(. These Ionians once

inhabited the coasts of natolia "odern Tur!ey and "any of its islands that landcalled Ionia generally and also were the founders and principal inhabitants ofthens.

The sons of Yavan FGenesis 10UM. Of the sons of Yavan all are identi$ed with thesea trade with Tyre in #Qe!iel chapter LU #lishah at LU Tarshish at LU1L Xitti"For hitti" at LUV in the Septuagint) Podani" here in Genesis is a "ista!e bythe ]ebrew copyists for Hodani" Fas `trong(s attests and at #Qe!iel LU1Fwhere the .Z. has PedanC we read HhodiansC F/;/) in the jkk. #lishahand Xitti" are both identi$ed with yprus with several varying spellings of these

na"es found in ancient inscriptions. Xitti" is the word for yprus throughout the]ebrew prophets. Hodani" are the Gree!s of Hhodes as identi$ed in the jkk. Tarshish is a region of southern `pain !nown as Tartessus. The Ionians For Yavanare connected with Tyrian sea trade also at #Qe!iel LU1K and 1\ "entioned withPanU for a portion of that tribe also settled Greece at an early ti"e and were!nown as Panaans. We see in the Xing Ya"es Zersion of #Qe!iel LU1\ Pan alsoand Yavan going to and fro occupied in thy fairsU bright iron cassia and cala"uswere in thy "ar!et.C This is a clear reference to Panaan Gree!s and IonianGree!s. Newer Bible translations write *edan [ a word which e&ists nowhere else [

for the ]ebrew construction which actually "eans and PanC. They do this inorder to further obfuscate history and protect their errant identi$cation of ancientIsraelites with ews.

The ships of TarshishC are "entioned in Xings hronicles sal"s and several of the prophets. lthough a separate and 'uite lengthy topic it can be convincinglyde"onstrated that the hoenicians of Tyre and elsewhere were the Israelites %called hoenicians by the Gree!s % right fro" the pages of the Bible with "uchevidence also added by secular historians. arthage was a hoenician colony of Tyre and the arthaginians eventually controlled the land we call `pain today

then called Iberia ]ebrewC or #berC land ust as the land south of the aucasus"ountains where the deported Israelites $rst settled and beca"e !nown as`cythians was also called Iberia even in Ho"an ti"es.

Piodorus `iculus FL.10.1 S. discusses wars between the arthaginian ]a"ilcarBarca and the Iberians and TartessiansC in the third century B.. ]erodotusFM.1L is writing about a period "uch earlier than his own even pre[dating the Troan War and spea!ing of Tartessus in southern `pain says This trading town



side fro" the peoples of Eeshech and Tubal having been con'uered by andliving a"ong the Ger"anic Hus Fand we see here that the `lavic tongue prevailedin Hussia and the colony of Eedes "oved by the Israelite `cythians to the Tanaqswhich later beca"e !nown as `ar"atians and later than that also !nown as`lavs these things already discussed above the other Yaphethite tribes "oved all

along the Eediterranean coasts and into #urope but were not !nown as `lavs. The Getae and the Paci are described by `trabo as being a!in to the ThraciansFTiras and having the sa"e tongue F.K.10 1K these inhabiting a great part ofboth sides of the lower Panube. lthough `trabo considered everything north ofthe Panube as Ger"any FL..K0 .1.1 et al. this particular area is historically`lavic. The Gree! Ionians also "ade "any settle"ents. The Ionians of hocaeain sia Einor were called by ]erodotus the $rst of the Gree!s who perfor"edlong voyagesC F1.1VK and these alone founded Eassalia FEarseilles on the coastof ^rance Eaenaca in Iberia #lea in Italy F`trabo M.1.M K.M.L and V.1.1 and

"any other colonies. The #trurians or #truscans of Italy descended fro" the`he"itic tribe of jud found $rst in natolia % the ancient jydians which shall bediscussed below. Italy was also settled by the Troans and especially Ho"eF`trabo V.1.1L and 1M the Ionians of sia Einor F`trabo V.1.1M V.L.L thethenians who were also Ionians and the chaeans who were Panaans F`traboV.1.10 11 1K and 1.

With so "any `lavs along with the races of `outhern ^rance and Italy a"ong ustoday Yapheth certainly is dwelling in the tents of `he" unto this day. _et we"ust understand thisU that the earliest da"ic tribes had "ost li!ely entered

#urope by K000 B yet the earliest substantial writing we have fro" our#uropean forebears is not until circa V00 B.

The Hamites: Genesis 10:6-20

ush FGenesis 10UV. Before beginning a discussion of ush For Xush it is 'uitei"portant to ac'uire an understanding of the word #thiopianC as the Gree!scalled the ushites as the word Xush is often translated in our Bibles and as wecall the people found inhabiting the land of Xush in frica today. Our #thiopianCco"es fro" the Gree! word xz?;A which properly "eans shining faceC glowing

faceC or sunburnt faceC and was certainly not used by the earliest Gree! writersto describe the naturally dar! races. There are several words used to describeblac!C swartC dar!C etc. in Gree! which are often applied to people a"ongthe" being <{5 @{/95 -{5 and |/5. Other words "eaning dar!C butapparently not applied to people are 3@7;5 @9|5 }9|;5 9|;5 ~|;5 and~|*;5.



word a!in to xz?;A is z5 which the large \th edition of jiddell `cottde$nes as !urnt ...II. shining...red%!rown...C. The 1\\V Hevised `upple"ent tothis edition inserts after !urnt perhaps !lack% or dark%complexionedC ande"ends shining to !ron+e%coloured. The blac! I "ust reect. ,ed%!rown describes a sun[tanned aucasian and not a dar![s!inned negro who only gets

blac!er in the sun. It see"s that the de$nition of these words have indeed overti"e been politically corrected.

Other words related to xz?;A areU •z49 fiery burning€of "etal flashingglittering...C •z4 to light up !indle...C •z* clear s!y fair weatherC z;Athe closest $ery[loo!ing of "etal Jashing of wine spar!lingC but according tojiddell `cott Fthe source for these de$nitions so"eone in the Gree!nthologies a late and wide collection of Gree! inscriptions and "iscellaneouswritings "ostly fro" well into the $rst "illenniu" .P. either translated or usedz;A as swart dar!C however this is clearly contrary to the true spirit of the

word(s "eaning. pplied to Xush a White "an or his White descendants it couldonly "ean sun[burntC as in bright red or brassy[colored which is so"ethingwhich happens only to aucasians in the outdoors and is e&actly what one "aye&pect Xushites in #thiopia to loo! li!eD

Eoses Jed #gypt as recorded in #&odus chapter L and "et with a tribe of theEidianites descendants of braha" and Xeturah FGenesis LU1[L fro" who" hetoo! a wife. These Eidianites lived in the land of Xush as can be discerned fro"Nu"bers chapter 1L. braha" had originally sent his sons by Xeturah eastwardunto the east countryC FGenesis LUV and surely this east countryC is that landwhich is called Xush F#thiopia in the .Z. at Genesis LU1K. Wherever we see#thiopia in the Bible the ]ebrew word is Xush. Ni"rod the Xushite founded the$rst da"ic e"pire FGenesis 10UR[1L which evidently spread far and widebeyond Eesopota"ia to where we have the ]indu[Xush "ountains of today. Theriver of Genesis LU1K that co"passeth the whole land of ushC in Eoses‚ ti"e"ay even be the Indus if not so"e other lost river for it is evident that theevents which caused the Peluge of Noah "ay have changed the geography of thearea. Eoses certainly did not go to #thiopia in frica for his wife and there are noEidianites ever spo!en of as being there.

In ]esiod(s Theogon probably written in the th century B.. I had dated it to

the Rth century B in the original version of this paper Ee"non legendary Xingof the #thiopians was the son of #os or jightC. In the Aethiopis by rctinus ofEiletus written as a se'uel to ]o"er(s $liad Ee"non the #thiopian aided the Troans in their war against the Gree!s only to be slain by chilles. ]erodotus"entions the #thiopians of siaC FK.\M and although he also describes blac!



and wooly[haired so[called #thiopiansC FK.101 .0 I will refer to Piodorusìculus for a "ore co"plete picture below. ]erodotus calls ùsa the fa"edcapital city Falong with ersepolis and also the Eedian city #cbatana of theersian #"pire the city of Ee"nonC F.K[M since the Gree!s believed thatEe"non had founded that city F`trabo 1.K.L. There being abundant proof that

the ersians of the Gree! histories were White it cannot be i"agined that theythought Ee"non to be blac!. ]erodotus was writing at an already late ti"e in#thiopian history when the ancient nation below #gypt and #gypt itself hadalready been overrun with Nubians.

Piodorus ìculus relating the tradition concerning Ee"non has #thiopia in siasending aid to the Troans including ssyrians and "en of ùsianaC FL.LL.1[M..M although Piodorus also records the clai"s of the #thiopians of frica thatthat place was the ho"e of Ee"non. "ong others pollodorus records the"yth that erseus legendary founder of the ersians "arried ndro"eda

daughter of the #thiopian Xing epheus and his wife assiepea after rescuing herfro" a sea "onster an event said to have ta!en place at Yoppa in alaestinewhich Yosephus the Yudaean historian also discusses Fpollodorus L.M.K Yosephus'ars K.\.K FKUML0. ò the Gree!s have "any witnesses of an #thiopiaC in siain lands and cities !nown to be inhabited by Whites and with people ta!ing partin so"e of the $rst events recorded by the White poets of #urope and the]ebrews have a Xush in a land which "ay surely be supposed to be the sa"e asthe Gree! yet the ]ebrew record is not "uch earlier than the events the laterGree!s were recording Fi.e. #&odus and death of Eoses c. 1M0 B.. Troan War

c. 11R B.. and as a third witness we have a Xush Fthe ]indu[Xush "ountainson our "odern "aps not "uch further east than where the Gree! and ]ebrewrecords tell us that the ancient district was situated.

In his boo! The Lost Tri!es( Pr. Eoore presents the viable theory that na"essi"ilar to Xush and found in southern Hussia are derivative peoples of this BiblicalpatriarchU Xosa XhoQa XhaQars and ossac!s.

Now to turn to the Xush or #thiopia of frica. In the $rst eleven chapters of histhird boo! Piodorus ìculus draws fro" "uch earlier historians Fas he always didfor who"ever he wrote about to describe the various peoples of frican #thiopiaand it is evident that those tribes contrast with one another 'uite star!ly. The $rst#thiopians he discusses are endowed with what we "ay consider a well[developed for" of western civiliQationC for he states they say that they werethe $rst to be taught to honor the gods and to hold sacri$ces and processions andfestivalsC they 'uote ]o"er in reference to the"selves F$liad 1UMLK[MLM theyrecount the unsuccessful invasions into their country by a"byses andè"ira"is and they clai" that the #gyptians were originally #thiopian colonists



led by Osiris. The two types of their writing Fli!e #gypt popular or de"otic andsacred or hieroglyphic are described and it is said that the sacred is co""ona"ong these #thiopians. Their priests were "uch li!e the #gyptian. Theybelieved that their !ings gained sovereignty by Pivine rovidence their laws andpunish"ents were fro" custo" and they practiced the sa"e Jight of refuge

which the Gree!s did which was si"ilar to the ]ebrew jevitical cities of refuge.n #thiopian !ing under tole"y was educated in Greece and studied hilosophyand aside fro" a few odd custo"s there is no reason to believe that these#thiopians whose physical characteristics were not "entioned were anything butciviliQed and not "uch diSerent than the rest of westernC society.

In star! contrast to those cultured #thiopians which Piodorus $rst discussedbeginning at K.R.1 he saysU But there are also a great "any other tribes of the#thiopians and here it is apparent that li!e hoeniciaC and other labels#thiopiaC has beco"e "erely a geographical designation rather than an

ethnographical one so"e of the" dwelling in the land lying on both ban!s of theNile and on the islands in the river others inhabiting the neighboring country ofrabia between the Nile and the Hed èa and others residing in the interior ofjibya the rest of frica [ ùdan here. The "aority of the" and especially thosewho dwell along the river are blac! in color and have Jat noses and wooly hair.C]ere it is evident that Piodorus is describing the Nubians and other wanderingblac! tribes of the region. ]e continuesU s for their spirit they are entirelysavage and display the nature of a wild beast...and are as far re"oved as possiblefro" hu"an !indness to one another...and cultivating none of the practices of

civiliQed life...they present a stri!ing contrast when considered in the light of ourown custo"s.C

ò surely it is apparent here that if we do not have a White culture in #thiopia inan era not long before Piodorus( own we certainly have at least the re"nants ofone. #Qe!iel chapter K0 lists #thiopia a"ong all the "ingled peopleC and all ofthis $ts very well with the picture of a once aucasian but now adulterated Xushin that region.

Of the sons of ush FGenesis 10U èba ]avilah àbtah Haa"ah àbtechahand the sons of Haa"ah `heba and Pedan not "uch will be said here. ò"e ofthese na"es appear again a"ong the sons of Yo!tan listed at Genesis 10ULV[K0 inboth the ET and the jkk and this has caused confusion and speculation inatte"pts to identify these tribes and even later in the Bible confusion see"s toe&ist Fco"pare I hr. 1U\ and KL. `trabo wrote of Berenic a àbaean cityCtogether with àbae a good siQed cityC which were on the frican side of the Hedèa F1V.M.10. It can only be i"agined that these peoples eventually "i&ing withaliens have given us the "any negroid and arab tribes of the region that we see



in later history.

Never has "ore confusion e&isted concerning race than that concerning theancient #gyptians. This is due "ostly to ewish encourage"ent of negro so[calledscholars which began in the $rst half of the L0th century with the pro"otion ofnegroes such as Earcus Garvey in the ewish press. In the 1\0‚s the belief that

the cultures of northern frica belonged to negroes began to be pro"oted inacade"ic circles. _et over L00 years of #uropean archaeology and anthropologyinsisted that ancient #gypt was White and the only 'uestion wasU ]ow Whiteƒ`urely Eitsrayi" or EiQrai" FGenesis 10UV is the Old Testa"ent ]ebrew for#gypt everywhere. #gypt or egyptus is the ter" used throughout Gree!literature and the land !nown as #gypt at that ti"e was only the area around theNile delta and the Nile valley along both ban!s of the river as far south as#lephantine. The early Gree!s see" to have written little about #gypt outside of Thebes and ]eliopolis until the ti"e of ]erodotus. There is "uch to be said

about early #gypt that is beyond the scope of this discussion but warrants atleast a "ention. irst early #gypt actually consisted of several disparate culturesso"e of the" alien in nature which were adverse to one another and wereeventually a"alga"ated by force and that was certainly not a good idea. Theearliest higher culture of #gypt was lin!ed by archaeologists and anthropologiststo the jevant but it "ay not be said that it was da"ic. The pharaonicciviliQation in #gypt appeared later and rather suddenly not long after K000 B..which is consistent with Septuagint chronology. This is where the #gypt ofEiQrai" begins. The archaeology of those early dynasties clearly reveals a people

of high civiliQation and ryan characteristics. `tatues of the pharaohs often reveal"en who would not be out of place in Publin or ]a"burg. ]owever once pperand jower #gypt were uni$ed and all of the disparate tribes brought under onegovern"ent #gyptian hy"ns include ideas of universalis" ecu"enis" and evene&press the idea of separatis" of races by color Fsee Ancient Near Eastern Texts

,elating to the &ld Testament pp. KV[KV. There is nothing new under the sun.

There see"s to have actually been two groups in early #gypt centuries apartre"e"bered as ]y!sosC. The $rst group little is !nown about perhaps a nobleda"ic race probably `he"ites and "aybe even ]ebrews who "ost li!ely built

the Great yra"id. The second were Xenites who invaded and occupied the Peltashortly before Yoseph was sold into #gypt. Puring the ti"e of Yoseph theharaohs at Thebes were of the ]ouse of `he" as was the priesthood of OnF]eliopolis or Beth[`he"esh. It was these #gyptians at Thebes who" Yoseph wassold to as a slave. Beth[`he"eshC is a double[entendreU it can "ean either]ouse of the `unC or ]ouse of the people of `he"C in palaeo[]ebrew. jater



Yoseph as vice[regent of #gypt and with the help of the seven[years fa"ine drovethe Xenites out of the delta for good.

What follows are two views of race in ancient #gypt fro" Ancient Near Eastern

Texts ,elating to the &ld Testament Ya"es B. ritchard editor rincetonniversity ress 1\V\U

^ro" ANET p. MM1 fro" The d"onitions of Ipu[Wer the original dated toappro&i"ately LK00[L00 BU

“ "an regards his son as his ene"y.€ "an of character goes in "ourningbecause of what has happened in the land....ôreigners have beco"e peopleeverywhere....C

footnote saysU The ter" "en hu"ans peopleC was used by #gyptians todesignate the"selves in contrast to their foreign neighbors who were notconceded to be real people.C

^ro" ANET p. KVV fro" ]y"n to "on[He the original dated to the #gyptiane"pire of appro&i"ately 1[1 BU

“tu" who "ade the people Pistinguished their nature "ade their life ndseparated colors one fro" another...C

n introductory note on p. KV saysU #gypt‚s world position under her #"pireproduced strong tendencies toward centraliQation and uni$cation of #gyptianreligion with universalis" and with syncretis" of the gods...C

In less than 00 years ancient #gyptians went fro" not even recogniQing aliens

as people to being one big universalist ecu"enical happy fa"ily. Ho"e and now"erica and #urope have followed the sa"e path to hell.

Of the òns of EiQrai" FGenesis 10U1KU judi" na"i" jehabi" Naphtuhi"athrusi" asluhi" hilisti" and aphtori" these are tribal and notindividuals( na"es. The na"i" are li!ely the na"iC "entioned in an Rthcentury B.. cuneifor" inscription. Naphtuhi" is apparently an #gyptian wordwhich "eans people of the deltaC and athrusi" "eans people of the southernlandC.

The hilisti" or hilistines had dwelt in the land of aphtor before their own"igration to alestine and aphtor was very probably in #gypt. èe "os \UPeuterono"y LULK and Yere"iah MUM. ertainly the hilistines were da"icFechariah \UV and so"e had surely "igrated west with the children of IsraelFIsaiah 11U1M. Goliath was not actually a hilistine but rather he was a"ercenary in their ar"y one of the sons of Hepha the anaanite giant for whichsee I hronicles L0UM[V where the phrase the giantC is in ]ebrew ha[raphah thesource of the Hephai" Fi.e. Genesis 1MU and 1UL0 II à"uel U1R and LL and



LKU1K et al.. There also should be noted an obscure entry in ]erodotus at L.1LRU]ence they the #gyptians co""only call the pyra"ids after hilition ashepherd who at that ti"e fed his Joc!s about the place.C ò"e suppose that this"ay be a "e"ory of the ancient hilistines in #gypt and the $rst shepherd!ingsC connected to the building of the Great yra"id.

The judi" are confused by the translators for the jydians the he"itic jud ofnatolia and jydianFsC at Yere"iah MVU\ and #Qe!iel K0U should be judi"Cinstead since these are descendants of ]a" and not `he". The judi" of ]a"are also "entioned at #Qe!iel LU10 in connection with the trade of ancient Tyre.

hut FGenesis 10UV was associated with jibya though it is dicult to discerne&actly why Fsee Nahu" KU\ and in the .Z. and the Septuagint it was translatedas such at #Qe!iel K0U and KRU and Yere"iah MVU\ FLVU\ in the jkk. The jubi"Fand so the na"e jibyaC and ù!!ii" FII hronicles 1LUK "ay have been pre[da"ic Faboriginal people since they are not "entioned in Genesis 10 or they

"ay have been da"ites who si"ply ca"e to be called by a diSerent na"eespecially since ù!!ii" "ay si"ply "ean tent[dwellerC. hut is listed a"ongall the "ingled peopleC at #Qe!iel K0U.

Piodorus ìculus FL0. writes of jibyans Fnot necessarily jubi" since the wordbeca"e a geographical ter" to the Gree!s dwelling on frica(s northern coast incities and friendly to arthage but then also of the no"adic jibyansC of theinterior hostile to arthage. ]e does not however describe jibyan orarthaginian physically. ôr perspective Zirgil a jatin poet conte"porary withPiodorus called Pido the legendary 'ueen of arthage who is "entioned by Yosephus and who was a historical $gure both blonde and beautiful in his fa"ouspoe" The Aeneid. Now of course Zirgil never "et Pido who lived R00 yearsbefore the poet(s ti"e but this does indicate Zirgil(s idea of what the idealhoenician wo"an "ay loo! li!e.

]esiod probably a conte"porary of Isaiah writing in his "atalogues of 'omen Ffrag"ent M0 "entions both the boundless blac![s!ins and the jibyansC butsays that fro" #paphus a son of hronos sprang the dar! jibyans and high[souled #thiopiansC but also the under[ground fol! and feeble pyg"iesC. It is also

apparent that by this ti"e jibya also was little "ore than a geographical label andsigni$ed all of frica e&cept #gypt and #thiopia. ùrely the "ore reliable earlysource "ay be the poet eschylus a conte"porary of Nehe"iah who in hisSuppliant Maidens at lines L[L\0 lists a group of races and co"pares theli!eness of their wo"en to those of the Gree! Panaans. "ong those "entionedare jibyans #gyptians and "aQons very li!ely indicating a large degree ofho"ogeneity a"ong these peoples. eschylus was relating a parody of events



which transpired a thousand years before his own ti"e the "igration of Pan fro"#gypt to Greece.

In this age we have long had a "i&ed race the Berbers as evidence of a for"erWhite civiliQation in this region although the settle"ents of the hoeniciansGree!s Ho"ans the later Ger"anic invasion of arthage and then the rise of

Eoha""edanis" and the subse'uent arab con'uest of northern frica all did"uch to further confound an already "ingled frican world.

anaan FGenesis10UV ]a"(s youngest son was cursed by Noah FGenesis \UL[L. The reason why anaan and not ]a" hi"self or his other sons was cursedshould be apparent by reading jeviticus L0U11 for anaan was the result of]a"(s illicit behavior warranting his special "ention at Genesis \U1R. nd soanaan(s descendants are later found "i&ed in with the race of ain FGenesisMU1V[LV and 1U1\[L1 Peuterono"y U1[L who was also cursed FGenesis MU10[1 and several races with no Biblical genealogy indicating that they are of non[

da"ic origin. ò"e of the [itesC here in Genesis 10U1V[1R also "ay well be ofnon[da"ic stoc! races that the anaanites "i&ed with rather than races whichsprung fro" anaan.

The ]ivitesC see" to be rather the ]oritesC the word ]iviteC being a scribalerror in all of its occurrences evident by co"paring Genesis KVUL L0 and K0 andalso the Septuagint at Genesis KMUL and Yosh. \U. The ]orites ]urrians to"odern anthropologists and archaeologists are often considered to be an orientalrace which invaded Eesopota"ia at a very early ti"e. ò"e ]orites dwelt atEount ]or to which the #do"ites the descendants of #sau who was also cursedFEalachi 1UL[K had oined the"selves. Eount ]or was later called Eount èirand is today !nown as etra in southern Yordan. èe Genesis chapter KV.

]eth was a progenitor of the people later !nown as the ]ittites which waspossibly a pre[da"ic tribe who" ]eth had settled with and therefore na"ed forhi" by the rest of the da"ic race. The na"e ìdon is found in the city in anaanof the sa"e na"e and its environs. èven hundred years before the Gree!s $rstwrote of hoeniciansC the anaanites of Tyre and ìdon and the rest of the coastwere driven out by the children of Israel who then inhabited those cities. The

hoeniciansC were indeed Israel. These descendants of anaan "ay be traced through both the Bible and throughhistory to the people that are called ewsC today although "any are also a"ongthe arabsC and the olive[s!inned peoples of the Eediterranean and the Near#ast. èeU Eatthew LKUK ju!e 11U1 Yohn RUKK[M Ho". \U1[1K HevelationLU\ and KU\ Yosephus( Anti-uities 1K.\.1 F1KULM[LR 1K.1.R F1KUK\[K\1..\[10 F1ULK[LVV and 'ars L.R.L FLU11\[1L1 L.L0.M FLUVV[VR and



M.M.M FMUL0[LK for a beginning of the study re'uired to understand thiscircu"stance.

In closing this discussion of the descendants of ]a" it "ay be said that withNi"rod we certainly have "ention of both the $rst da"ic tyrant a "an whowould rule over his !in outside of the laws of _ahweh and also the $rst

"ulticultural e"pireC since the cities "entioned at Genesis 10U10 had longe&isted and "ay have been already populated with peoples of other races. Thereis "uch evidence that the beginnings of westernC civiliQation appeared rathersuddenly here in Eesopota"ia by which the Genesis chapter 11 account has"uch creditability once it is realiQed that this represents the beginnings of theWhite race and certainly not all races.

The hemi"es Genesis 10213415

That the ersians sprung fro" #la" FGenesis 10ULL should be evident by the

prophets alone for everywhere that we $nd #la" in the Bible we $nd theersians ful$lling their role in history for e&a"ple in Isaiah chapters 1K and L1and we also $nd consistent "ention of #la" along with Eadai or the Eedes at

Yere"iah LUL Paniel ULR and VUR[1 and even at cts LU\. In his 1Vth boo!`trabo discusses the geography of the arthian #"pire of which ersia was atthat ti"e a part. ùsiana was the district along the Tigris adacent to the ersianGulf and opposite Babylon. ersis bordered usiana to the east and also held"ost of the eastern shore of the Gulf. #ly"ais F„{…<†5 is north of usiana andEedia north of #ly"ais. It is not hard to see the na"e #la" in #ly"ais which the

ssyrians in their records called #la"tu. long with Eadai FGenesis 10UM #la"for"ed the Eedo[ersian e"pire of historic ti"es the two ar"s of the i"age ofthe beast of Paniel chapter L.

sshur FGenesis 10ULL fro" who" sprung the nation of the ssyrians oftencalled sshur by the prophets had a long and tu"ultuous history before their ownrise to e"pire and $rst invasions of Israel c. M B.. ôr "any centuries theywere overshadowed by For under the yo!e of the ]ittites the ]orite F]urrianEitanni Xingdo" or the ù"erians or Babylonians. It is evident fro" "any oftheir own inscriptions that the ssyrians absorbed "uch ]ittite bloodU for the

ewishC hoo!ed nose is co""on in their portraits yet there "ust have been"any true ssyrians living at the ti"e of the prophet Yonah who urged the" torepent both "an F`trong(s ‡1L0 adam and beastC FYon. KUR.

That jud FGenesis 10ULL is jydia in western natolia F"odern Tur!ey issupported by Isaiah VVU1\ which is the only other "ention of the `he"itic jud inthe Bible. ll other "entions of jud or by error of the translators jydianFsC inthe Old Testa"ent are actually the judi" sons of EiQrai" in #gypt. Eost of the



translators and co""entators confuse these two diSerent tribes na"ed jud.Isaiah VVU1\ was surely ful$lled concerning jud when the Xi""erians FXeltsdescendants of the Israelites who" the ssyrians deported invaded natoliadestroying "uch of hrygia and invading jydia and Ionia before crossing over into

Thrace in #urope at the end of the th century B.. Fsee for instance

Archaeolog .I.. Yanuary[êbruary L00L p. MM. Three centuries later at thebeginning of the Krd century B.. Xeltic tribes returned to natolia invadedGreece and settled in the province later !nown as Galatia visited by aul of Tarsus. These are the Galatians to who" he wrote the epistle of that na"e.`haron Turner in his .istor of the Anglo%Saxons p. M0 discusses this Xelticactivity in jydia and the rest of sia Einor at this early ti"e.

The #truscans also called Tyrrhenians and #trurians who for several centuriesheld Itrurea in Italy and parts of the coasts and islands in the westernEediterranean are discussed at length by Piodorus ìculus Fpri"arily at .M0 S.

although he states nothing concerning their origins. ]owever ]erodotus F1.\M`trabo F.L.L and Tacitus F Annals of ,ome M.L S. all state that the #truscanswere originally jydians. rchaeologists doubt the #truscan[jydian connectionsi"ply because no #truscan inscriptions have been found in natolia. ùchinscriptions have however been found on islands oS the coast of natolia.

#verywhere in the Old Testa"ent that the words `yria or `yrian appear ra"FGenesis 10ULL is the ]ebrew word fro" which they are derived. It is apparentthat the Gree! words ˆ…*? F`yria and 2*;5 FTyre have at various ti"es bothbeen derived fro" the sa"e ]ebrew word Tsor F`trong(s ‡s VRVM and VRV theancient na"e for Tyre. There does see" to be confusion concerning the na"e`yriaC in ancient ti"es or possibly the Gree!s purposely used the ter" todescribe a wider area than ust the land of ra". ]erodotus counts alestine aspart of `yria F.R\ i and calls the Yudahites who fought against Necho at Eegiddo`yriansC FL.1\ II hronicles KUL0. ]e also calls `yriansC certainappadocians who dwell about the rivers Ther"‰don and artheniusC FL.10M.`trabo e&plains that the appadocians have to the present ti"e been calledWhite `yrians( as though so"e `yrians were blac!C F1V.1.L and so we "aydeduce that all the `yrians !nown to `trabo were White so far as he wasconcerned. Eany writers including `trabo "istoo! the ssyrians for `yriansF1V.1.K certainly due to the si"ilarity of the na"es in Gree!. Originally ra"was centered in Pa"ascus. The Gree!s spo!e of a yrian na"ed inyras F$liad11.L0 who con'uered yprus and had aphos for a capital yet "ostco""entators Fi.e. Hawlinson(s notes in his ]erodotus at L.1RL and .1\ haveaphos as an early hoenician colony. Yosephus in his Anti-uities at \.1M.LF\ULRK[LR has yprus Fthe itteansC as subects of Tyre ust prior to the



ssyrian invasions of Israel. #Qe!iel LUV has the Israelite tribe of sher in yprusand Tyre was in sher(s territory. The language of ra" ra"aic beca"e thedo"inant language of trade in the Near #ast until it was supplanted by Gree!after the ti"e of le&ander. ôr the ersian e"pire ra"aic and not arsi wasthe lingua franca. Yacob too! wives of jaban the `yrianC although jaban was a

]ebrew by race a descendant of one of braha"(s brothers.rpha&ad FGenesis 10ULL the ancestor of the ]ebrews has no land surviving intothe historic period which I have been able to identify not wanting to rule outsurviving inscriptions which I have not yet seen. braha" though soourning inhaldaea when he appears in the Genesis record obviously had ]aran in farnorthern `yria for a ho"eland a town which shared its na"e with both a brotherand a grandfather of braha". This land was also once called addan[ra" but"ay have been the original land of rpha&ad. Not long after braha" left ]aranthe area was overrun by the "orites and then by ]urrians and ]ittites and was

a later part of the ]urrian Eitanni Xingdo". The na"e #ber FGenesis 10ULM co"es fro" a word "eaning acrossC or theopposite sideC F`trong(s ‡s VV and V. The usage is si"ilar to the Gree!words -*9 and -*7;5. The phrase 7Š -*7 7‹5 ;@;…<95 or theopposite ends of the inhabited worldC was used by aul at Ho". 10U1R. ì"ilarly Tacitus used the phrase ends of the earthC in the Agricola chapters 1L LM andKK to describe the location of Ireland and Britain. ]o"er used a si"ilar phrase inthe &dsse to describe the other end of the Eediterranean that part about`pain. It is at the other sideC of the inhabited worldC that we $nd so "any

ancient na"es li!e that of #ber the $rst ]ebrewU Iberia F`pain the #bro Hiver Fin`pain ]ibernia FIreland and the ]ebrides Fislands oS the coast of `cotland.Euch later so"e of the lands occupied by the deported Israelites the `cythiansheld si"ilar na"es such as Iberia south of the aucasus Eountains and the]ebrus Hiver in Illyria FPiodorus ìculus 1\.V.V. None of this is coincidental.

The sons of #ber were eleg and Yo!tan FGenesis 10UL. ò"e writers such aserry #dward owell F/ather A!raham0s "hildren associate the elasgian Gree!swith eleg. t $rst I denied the association since elasgianC see"s to be aco"pound of the Gree! words -{5 FnearC and }‹5 or }‹ FlandC and so asthey were to the Ionians neighborsC ust as the `partans si"ply called theGree!s about `parta -*?;/@;/ or neighborsC. _et `trabo says ...the elasgiwere by the ttic people called elargi( which "eans `tor!sC the co"pilersadd because they were wanderers and li!e birds resorted to those places witherchance led the"C F.L.M. #lsewhere `trabo cites Gree! writers who clai"ed thatthe elasgians ca"e fro" Thessaly F\..LL and there a people who" `trabocalls elagonians are found F\..11 so there "ay be so"e "erit to owell(s



assertion. The elasgians are said to have spread throughout the whole ofGreeceC in ancient ti"es F`trabo .L.M and when the Panaans ca"e fro" #gyptthey were also called by that na"e F`trabo R.V.\. The apparently peacefulreception of the Panaans in Greece "ay well be e&plained if those inhabitants ofGreece before the arrival of Pan were also ]ebrews.

Yo!tan FGenesis 10UL "eans he will be "ade littleC F`trong(s ‡KK and sohis na"e is a prophecy by itself and his race was surely absorbed by indigenouspopulations called arabsC by us Fand by the"selves today. While several of Yo!tan(s descendants( na"es "ay be identi$ed so"e tentatively with places inrabia two stand out and "erit discussion here.

`heba FGenesis 10ULR was a "ountainous area of what is now _e"en. èeF#&cavating the jand of `hebaC Archaeolog &dsse Nove"ber[Pece"berL001 p. MM. The Œueen of `heba FI Xings chapter 10 who visited òlo"on wascalled the Œueen of the òuth by _ahshua FEatthew 1LUML ju!e 11UK1 and she

was for all of the circu"stances of her "ention surely of the da"ic Hace.`trabo "entions àbaeansC in co"pany with Nabataean arabs F1V.M.1\[L1.

Ophir FGenesis 10UL\ was surely so"ewhere on the eastern coast of frica òuthof #thiopia. This is evident fro" the account of goods obtained fro" Ophir givenin I Xings chapters \ and 10 and fro" the fact that the place was reached fro" aport on the Hed èa F#Qion[geber in the .Z. and yet also fro" the na"e Ophiritself. ôr Ophir is certainly the sa"e na"e as the jatin fer which precededfrica as the Ho"an na"e for the continent. lthough the Gree!s !new not thena"es Ophir or fer at least in their writings for they had the continent dividedinto but three districts #gypt #thiopia and jibya they did have a word |*5Faphros which "eant foa"C. Other si"ilar Gree! words are Ž|*49 Faphr‰nwithout sense...craQed frantic...silly foolishC and |*;329 Faphrosun follythoughtlessness senselessnessC. While "any "ay see the si"ilarity of thesewords as coincidences I a" not so sure I believe in such coincidences that theyare coincidences at all. lso it is evident that the derivation of the word fricafro" fer in jatin actually follows the convention found in Gree! for declensionsof the Genitive case Fi.e. kurios1 kuriakos2 phoinos1 phoinikos. It should also notbe thought of as "erely coincidental that the Gree! na"es for #urope and jibyaand the Ho"an na"e for frica can all be shown to have co"e fro" the ]ebrewtongue.

While searching for the root of our #nglish word blac!C I ca"e across the]ebrew words !ala- F`trong(s ‡1110 to annihilateC !alag F‡10RL to brea!offC or to invade Fwith destructionC and the Gree! word {= Fbla& genitivefor" {@5 Fbla!os which "eans slac! in "ind and body stupid a doltC. rethese also coincidencesƒ



Whatever happened to Ophir we certainly have no record of and especially sincethe Ho"ans never wandered into frica beyond #thiopia although they surely!new of the land there F`trabo 1V.M.1M.

`o we have the `he"ites and the ]ebrews and here it should be evident thatthese ter"s have today been "isappropriated by people to who" they do not

belong. There were by the Septuagint chronology nearly 1R00 years between the ti"e of the Peluge and the writing of the entateuch and about R00 "ore to the ti"e of#Qe!iel and Yere"iah and to the advent of written records a"ong the Gree!s.]o"er and ]esiod it can be shown were conte"poraries of Yere"iah #Qe!ieland Paniel. ll throughout this ti"e the various tribes of da"ites sought newand better land throughout the !nown world and points beyond na"ing newplaces and adopting those na"es. With so few written records how dicult it isto deter"ine their "ove"entsD ]o"er the earliest Gree! writer !nown to us and

who" `trabo considered > )*+m5 Ffro" the beginningC for the validity of hisrecords and the $rst geographerC F1.1.11 being a conte"porary of the Biblicalprophets wrote rather late in the history of IsraelD

What the Greeks looked like

That the Gree!s Fand the Italians were in ancient ti"es fully ho"ogenous withthe aucasians of northern #urope as "ost of the" appear today and certainlynot with the current olive[s!inned inhabitants of those regions Falong with "ost of southern #urope is fully evident everywhere in their art and literature.

"ong ]o"er(s oft repeated epithets were ]era with the snow[white ar"sC andgrey[eyed thenaC. chilles is described as having red[gold hairC F$liad nearLKU1V0. When Eenelaos was shot with an arrow re"oval of his clothing fortreat"ent revealed the ivory whiteC Jesh of his thigh. In the &dsse Eenelaosis called the red[haired captainC FMU1[R. Pescribing Odysseus ]o"er tells ofhi" with crisping hair in curls but all red[goldenC FVU1\[LKL. ]esiod in his"atalog of 'omen sings of golden[haired EenelaosC F1.V. The ]o"eric ]y"nTo Demeter tells of golden[hairedC Pe"eter F1.K0L. `elen‘ is white ar"edCand bright[tressedC FTo Selen3 lines 1[1R. olyneices is described as golden[

hairedC in The The!aid Fp. L of the #pic ycle and the Troan Gany"edes isgolden[hairedC also according to the ]o"eric ]y"n To Aphrodit4. Thesedescriptions and "any others li!e the" survived throughout all Gree! andHo"an literature and were used of Gree!s and Ho"ans well into the hristian era. They were also used of the early hoenicians and the hoenician wo"en of Thebes in Greece were said to be fair and blonde as they are described in thetragic poetry of both #uripides and eschylus and in the wor!s of the later Ho"anpoet Zirgil.



The archaeological record fully supports these descriptions. ]undreds "aybeeven thousands of "urals and "osaics fro" Greco[Ho"an territories display tallfair usually Fbut not always sun[tanned "en and tall fair lily[white wo"en.Gree! "en li!e hoenicians Ho"ans and ]ebrews Fi.e. Yohn L1U1 Yosephus( Anti-uities 1L..1 F1LULM1 were typically na!ed while wor!ing outdoors while

wo"en spent far less ti"e outside always fully clothed. Yosephus also atteststhat Yudaeans and Gree!s were indistinguishable e&cept that Yudaeans werecircu"cised F Anti-uities 1L..1 F1LULM1. Of course the Biblical record alsoagrees with this i.e. Pavid FI `a". 1VU1L and 1UML `olo"on Fant. U\[1Vand also ja". MU and of Noah in I #noch 10UL[M Fjawrence(s verse division.

lthough there are certainly arabC or olive[s!innedC types found a"ong thearchaeological records in the Ho"an era and in lands controlled by Ho"eU even inplaces in Italy itself these are but a s"all "inority and not at all representative of the originators of Eediterranean or near eastern civiliQation nor of the general

populations until long after the fall of Ho"e and the Isla"ic con'uests. Theartwor! of the ByQantine culture in the east reJects a predo"inantly White societywhich survived until the con'uest of its territories $rst by arabs and then later bythe Tur!s.

Salvation and !srael

The word salvationC appears often in the Old Testa"ent in pro"ises to Israel andit is actually intended to "ean preservation or safety Fsee `trong(s ]ebrew ‡sKMMM KMVR and RVVR. Israel was pro"ised to be preserved in this world notonly in the spiritual after[world. But preserved fro" whatƒ The answer to that lies

$rst in the prophets and the foretold destruction of the nations surrounding Israelin alestine and in sal" L which foretold that Israel would con'uer the othernations FGenesis chapter 10 nations and then in prophecies such as those foundat Paniel chapter R and Hevelation chapter \ and the plagues described therewhich destroy "uch of the da"ic world unto this very day.

#gypt and #thiopia had been overrun by blac! Nubians in the Rth century B..ssyria already a nation bastardiQed with ]orite and ]ittite blood was destroyedby the `cythian Israelites at the end of the th century after which the Israelite

Xi""erians overran all of natolia. In the Vth century B.. the entire Near #astwas con'uered by ersia then in the Mth century by the Gree!s and in the Krd bythe arthians and in the 1st by Ho"e which co"peted with arthia for territory.ll during this ti"e the `cythian and Xeltic Israelites along with the Yaphethitetribes who also escaped to the north were "ultiplying and spreading the"selvesthroughout #urope and also "any parts of sia. By the ti"e of hrist howeverIsraelites had con'uered and co"e to inhabit all of the !nown world as theHo"ans in the west the arthians in the east and the Ger"anic `cythians in the



north. nd also by this ti"e e&cept perhaps for the Ionian Gree!s at thens whowere under Ho"an rule and the àr"atians For `lavs and related tribes ofnorthern #urope all Yaphethites none of the other Genesis chapter 10 nations hadeven a legiti"ate clai" to any longer being a nation if they were to be found atall. ll of the" are now lost to history.

ìnce the fall of Ho"e "ost of the for"erly White Ho"an world has been lost.frica and Eesopota"ia `pain and ìcily were all overrun by arabs destroying"uch of the da"ic blood of those regions. fter the arab con'uests arose the Tur!s fro" the east who overran arthia natolia FTur!ey today Greece and theBal!ans. While the Tur!s were destroying the da"ic blood of Greece and theByQantine #"pire the Eongols invaded Hussia con'uering "uch of southernHussia the !raine and subecting "odern Ho"ania. While the Hussians"anaged to defeat and drive out the Eongols in the 1th century the Tur!s heldGreece into the 1\th century and "ost Gree!s today should be considered Tur!s

or arabs. Eusli" tribes still inhabit the Bal!ans. ll of the western Eongol areasfor"erly all White adopted the Isla"ic religion early in the second "illenniu".

nd so not only have all of the regions of the for"er Genesis chapter 10 da"icnations been overrun and destroyed by the alien invasions but also "any of thechildren of Israel were also lost in these invasions. Today the White race in #uropeis again being invaded by arabs and Tur!s and now legallyCD

"##reviations

.I.. rchaeological Institute of "erica.

.Z. The uthoriQed Xing Ya"es Zersion of the Bible.jkk The Septuagint the early Fc. LR0 B.. translation of the ]ebrew `cripturesinto Gree!.

MT The Masoretic Text, the Here! Script"res as the# !ere compi$e% an% e%ite% # the &e!s in the

$ate first mi$$enni"m '.(. The )in* +ames $% Testament, an% most others, are ase% on this

text.

7$T8E Some time between July 21st and July 27th, 2015, this article somehow disappeared from

our website for reasons unknown to us. We were able to restore it from a backup of our database in

order to retriee the most recent ersion of the article as it last e!isted. "he ori#inal article had 517$iews %reflected here& and the '() 12*1 downloads before its disappearance and restoration.

the race of genesis 10 by william finck

Documents