the relationship between listening frequency to...
TRANSCRIPT
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LISTENING FREQUENCY TO ENGLISH
SONGS AND STUDENTS’ LISTENING ACHIEVEMENT
(A Correlational Study on Fourth Semester Students of Department of English Education of State
Islamic University of Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta Academic Year 2014/2015)
“A Skripsi”
Presented to Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teachers’ Training in Partial Fulfillment and
Requirement for the Degree of S.Pd (S1) in the English Language Education
By:
Niki Brilian Rindu Putri
NIM : 1111014000109
DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH EDUCATION
FACULTY OF TARBIYA AND TEACHERS’ TRAINING
STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH
JAKARTA
2016
i
ABSTRACT
NIKI BRILIAN RINDU PUTRI, 2015, The Correlation Between Frequency in
Listening to English Songs and Students’ Listening Achievement (A Correlational
Study on 4th
Semester of Department of English Education Students of Islamic State
University of Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta Academic Year 2014/2015), Skripsi,
Department of English Education, The Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teachers’ Training,
Islamic State University of Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 2015
Key Words Listening Frequency to English Songs,
Listening Achievement
The purpose of this study is to know whether there is correlation between listening to
English songs’ frequency and students’ listening achievement on 4th
semester
students of Department of English Education of UIN Jakarta. The sample of this
study is 23 students from class B. The method of this study was quantitative method
and the technique that used was correlational technique. The data was collected from
questionnaire about students’ listening frequency to English songs and listening IV
Final test, which was collected from listening IV lecturer. Both of the data were
calculated with SPSS 22 program. The result shows that there is a positive correlation
between listening frequency to English songs and listening achievement. It proved by
the rxy (0.641) which bigger than rtable (0.413). It considered that null hypothesis (Ho)
in this research is rejected and the alternative hypothesis (Ha) which state that there is
correlation between listening frequency to English songs and students’ listening
achievement is accepted. In Conclusion there is a positive correlation between
listening frequency to English songs and students’ listening achievement. It means
that the higher listening frequency to English songs, the better listening achievement
students’ get.
ii
ABSTRAK
NIKI BRILIAN RINDU PUTRI, 2015, The Correlation Between Frequency in
Listening to English Songs and Students’ Listening Achievement (Penelitian
Korelasi di Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta), Skripsi,
Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, Universitas Islam
Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 2015
Key Words Listening Frequency to English Songs,
Listening Achievement
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah ada korelasi antara
frekuensi mendengarkan lagu bahasa Inggris dan pencapaian kemampuan
mendengarkan dalam bahasa Inggris siswa semester 4 Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris
UIN Jakarta. Sampel untuk penelitian ini adalah 23 siswa dari kelas B. Metode yang
digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode kualitatif dan teknik yang digunakan
adalah teknik korelasi. Data untuk penelitian ini diambil dari kuisioner tentang
frekuesi siswa mendengarkan lagu bahasa Inggris dan nilai ujian akhir semester
(UAS) matakuliah Listening IV yang diambil oleh dosen matakuliah tersebut. Kedua
data yang telah dikumpulkan kemudian diolah menggunakan program SPSS 22.
Hasilnya memperlihatkan bahwa ada korelasi positif antara frekuensi mendengarkan
lagu bahasa Inggris dan pencapaian kemampuan medengarkan siswa. Ini dibuktikan
dengan rxy (0.641) lebih besar dari rtabel (0.413). Hal ini dapat menyatakan bahwa null
hipotesis (Ho) ditolak dan hipotesis alternatif yang menyatakan bahwa ada korelasi
antara frekuesi mendengarkan lagu bahasa Inggris dan pencapaian kemampuan
mendengarkan siswa diterima. Kesimpulannya adalah ada korelasi positif frekuesi
mendengarkan lagu bahasa Inggris dan pencapaian kemampuan mendengarkan siswa.
Ini juga berarti bahwa semakin tinggi frekuensi siswa mendengarkan lagu bahasa
Inggris, semakin baik juga pencapaian kemampuan mendengarkan siswa.
v
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
In the name of Allah, the Beneficent and the Merciful
All praised is due to Allah, Lord of the world, who has given me love and
blessing to finish my last assignment in my study, “Skripsi”. Peace and salutation be
upon to the prophet Muhammad SAW, his family, his companion and his adherence.
It is a pleasure to acknowledge the help and contributions to all of lecturers,
institutions, family and friends who have contributed in the different ways hence this
“Skripsi” is processed until it becomes a complete writing which will be presented to
the Faculty of Tarbiya and Teachers’ Training in partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the degree S. Pd (Bachelor of Arts) in English Languge Education.
First, I would like to give thanks to my advisors Miss. Evilianing Eviyuliwati, M.
Hum and Miss Hapsari Dwi Kartika, MA, TESOL who have given me precious help,
guidance and advices patiently during the completion and the development of the
study.
I also realize that I will never able to finish this “Skripsi” without help and
support from people around me. Therefore, I would like to give my gratitude and
appreciations to:
1. Prof. Dr. Ahmad Thib Raya, MA, as the Dean of Faculty of Tarbiya and
Teachers’ Traning Islamic State University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
2. Dr. Alek, M.Pd, as the Head of De partment of English Education
3. Zaharil Anasy, M.Hum, as the Secretary of Department of English Education
4. All lecturers of Department of English Education who always give motivation
and valuable knowledge during my study.
vi
5. Neneng Sunengsih, M.Pd, as the lecturer of listening IV of Department of
English Education.
6. Dr. Ratna Sari Dewi, M.Pd, as class C 2011 Academic Advisor who always
give support and advices during my study.
7. To my Papa, Mama, Andung, my little sisters and brother and all my family
that always support me.
8. To my collage best friends Ajeng, Dwi, Dessi, Ditta, Nunky, and Esti who
always be there whenever I needed.
9. To Emy, Kenanga, Wanda, and Tiara, my best friends. Thank you for every
support you give to me.
10. All 4th
semester students of Department of English Education Academic Year
2014/2015, as the participant of this research.
11. All friends from Class C 2011 who always together no matter what.
The words are not enough to say any appreciation for their help and contribution
in this “Skripsi”. May Allah, the Almighty bless them all. Moreover, the writer also
realized that this “Skripsi” is far from perfect. It is a pleasure for me to get critiques
and suggestion to make this “Skripsi” better.
Jakarta, 30 Desember 2015
The Writer
vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT ………………………………………………………………………. i
ABSTRAK ………………………………………………………………………...ii
ENDORSEMENT SHEET ………………………………………….…………… iii
APPROVAL ………………………………………………………………………. iv
ACKNOWLEDGMENT …………………………………………………………v
TABLE OF CONTENTS ………………………………………………………...vii
LIST OF TABLES ………………………………………………………………..ix
LIST OF FIGURES ………………………………………………………………x
LIST OF APPENDICES …………………………………………………………xi
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………..1
A. Background of the Study ………………………….……….. 1
B. The Identification of Problems …………………………….. 4
C. The Limitation of the Study ……………………………….. 4
D. Formulation of the Study ………………………………….. 4
E. The Objective of the Study ………………………………… 4
F. The Significances of the Study …………………………….. 5
CHAPTER II THEORITICAL FRAMEWORK ….………………………… 6
A. Listening …………………………………………………… 6
1. Definition of Listening …………………………………..6
2. Types and Process of Listening Activities ……………… 7
3. The Purpose of Listening ……………………………….. 11
4. Listening Achievement …………………………………. 11
B. Songs ……………………………………………………….. 12
1. Definition of Song ………………………………………. 12
2. Physiological Response to Music ………………………. 13
3. The Use of Songs as Authentic Listening Material …...... 15
4. Factors Contributing to Listening Comprehension of Song
……………………………………………………………16
5. Listening to Songs as Habit …………………………...... 17
6. Benefit of Songs ………………………………………… 18
C. Relevant Study …………………………………………….. 19
D. Conceptual Framework ……………………………………..20
viii
E. Theoretical Hypothesizes ……………………………...…… 20
CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY …………………………..… 21
A. Place and Time of Study ………………………………….... 21
B. Population and Sample …………………………………..… 21
C. Method of Study …………………………………………… 21
D. Design of Study ……………………………………………. 22
E. Technique of Data Collection ……………………………… 22
F. Technique of Data Analysis ………………………………... 24
G. Statistical Hypothesizes ……………………………………. 26
CHAPTER IV RESEARCH FINDING ………………………………………. 27
A. Data Description …………………………………………… 27
B. Data Analysis ………………………………………………. 32
C. Data Interpretation …………………………………………. 38
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS ……………………… 40
A. Conclusion …………………………………………………. 40
B. Suggestions ………………………………………………… 40
BIBLIOGRAPHY ………………………………………………………………... 43
APPENDICES
ix
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3.1 Reliability Test ………………………………………………….…….. 23
Table 3.2 Normality Test ………………………………………………………… 24
Table 3.3 Correlation Coefficient Table …………………………………………. 25
Table 4.1 Score of Questionnaires ………………………………………………. 28
Table 4.2 Listening Test Score …………………………………………………... 30
Table 4.3 Summary of Questionnaires Scores (X) and Listening Test Scores (Y). 32
Table 4.4 Normality Test of the Data ……………………………………………. 33
Table 4.5 Linearity Test of the Data ……………………………………………... 34
Table 4.6 Data Analysis Table …………………………………………………... 35
Table 4.7 Result of Correlation Coefficient ……………………………………... 38
Table 4.8 Correlation Coefficient Table …………………………………………. 39
x
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 4.1 Students’ Frequency in Listening to English Songs (X) ……………… 32
Figure 4.2 Listening Achievement (Listening IV Score) (Y) …………………….. 33
xi
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX 1 Details of Questionnaire Scores ………………………………… 47
APPENDIX 2 Questionnaire Validation Result ……………………………….. 49
APPENDIX 3 Questionnaire Question before Validation …………………….. 50
APPENDIX 4 Questionnaire Question after Validation ………………………. 51
APPENDIX 5 Listening IV Final Test (UAS) Scores …………………………..52
APPENDIX 6 Distribusi Nilai rtabel Signifikansi 5% dan 1% ………………...55
1
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
A. Background of the Study
These days, there are many foreign language that support people activities
and English is one of them. English as we know become the International
language. There are many aspects in our live such as education, technology,
business, or even entertainment using English. That is why now many people
realize the importance of English proficiency.
English proficiency consists of the four basic skills of language; these are
listening, speaking, reading and writing. All of these proficiencies are very
important, still listening contributes primarily for language expertise. D.
Renukadevi, assistant professor from Erode Sengunthar Engineering Collage
stated that listening awakens awareness of the language, as it is a receptive skill
that first develops in a human being.1 The sound, rhythm, intonation and stress of
the language can only be perfectly adapted through listening.
On the other hand, Vandergrift stated listening comprehension lies at the
heart if language learning but it is the least understood and least researched skill.2
Many teachers think that listening skill can be learned along with speaking skill. If
all teachers get used with this perception, it will become a problem in acquiring
second language considering listening provides input for the language acquisition
process and it also dominantly used in daily life.3 That is why foreign language
learner cannot think little of listening.
There are two reasons why listening have very important role in language
acquisition. First, is to provide input for the language acquisition process and
1 D. Renukadevi, The Role in Language Acquisition;the Challenges & Strategies in
Teaching Listening, International Journal of Education Information Studies,Vol.4, 2014, p.59. 2 L. Vandergrift & C.C M. Goh, Teaching and Learning Second Language Listening, (New
York: Routledge, 2012),p. 4. 3 Yun Kul Cheung, The Importance of Teaching Listening in EFL Classroom, Journal of
Institute of Education Science,2010, p.24.
2
second is dominantly used in daily life. 4 Miller also stated that forty percent of
our daily communication is spent on listening, thirty-five percent on speaking,
about sixteen percent on reading, and only nine percent on writing.5 The highest
percentage of involvement in exchange of information in effective
communication, listening has to be considered a language forerunner .Thus, there
can be no doubt that activity that we do the most every time is listening.
If it’s true that listening skills are the most important outcomes of early
language teaching that explains the constant demands for methods that
successfully improve listening skills of learners.6 There are many teaching aids
that can be used for practicing listening skill such as pictures and diagrams,
movies, and songs. In this research writer will take songs as example of teaching
aids in practicing listening. Songs can be one of the most enjoyable ways to
develop listening skills. Also practice listening skill through song can prevent
boredom. The learners are active during the listening, rather than waiting until
rather waiting until the end to do something.
Mandelsohn stated that if students listen to target language all day, they
would improve their listening ability through the experience.7 Through songs,
students discover the natural stretching and compacting of the stream of English
speech. Song will be the easiest tool to use to help learner developing listening
ability, since for most learners singing songs and listening to music are enjoyable
experiences.8 Also, these days with technology advances we can listen to music in
everywhere. From this, learners can listen to a song, especially English song
anytime they want.
4 David Nunan, Language Teaching Methodology, (London: Prentince Hall International,
Ltd., 1991), p.6. 5
Lindsay Miller, Developing Listening Skills with Authentic Materials, ESL Magazine,
2003, p.16. 6 Mustava Sevik, Teaching Listening Skills to Young Learners through "Listen and Do"
Songs, English Teaching Forum, Vol. 50, No. 3, 2012, p.1. 7 David J. Mendelsohn, Learning How to Listen Using Learning Strategies. Current Trends
in the Development and Teaching of Four Language Skills. E. Uso-Juan and A. Martinez- Flor.
Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2006. p.75. 8
Tony Lynch, Academic Listening: Marrying Top and Bottom. Current Trends in the
Development and Teaching of Four Language Skills. E. Uso-Juan and A. Martinez- Flor. Berlin:
Mouton de Gruyter, 2006. p. 93.
3
Listening to English songs will become the easiest way to help EFL learner
developing their listening skill. Through listening to English songs, learners are
exposed to authentic example of the second language because simple and
repetitive songs often contain a resurgent grammatical pattern. Song has big
advantage to practice listening because of their meaningful context, appealing,
package and topics of broad human interest. 9
Referring to that explanation above, this study aims to investigate the
listening frequency to English songs amongst the fourth semester students of
Department English Education of UIN Jakarta and their listening achievement as
indicated in their Final examination held by English Education Department. The
writer assumed that more often students listening to English songs, the better skill
they have in listening ability. A large amount of time or a high frequency in time
of listening to English songs can help develop listening mastery in better ways.
B. The Identification of the Problems
Based on the background above, there were some problem in teaching and
learning listening. The problem was:
1. The students have lack of motivation in learning listening.
2. The teachers are difficult to find suitable method to stimulate students
learning listening.
3. Many students feel difficulty in listening to native speaker because they thing
native speaker speak to fast.
4. Sometimes teacher using the same material to practice listening so the
students feel bored.
C. The Limitation of the Study
Based on the problem identification, the writer limits the study on the
relationship between listening frequency to English song and listening
9 Thomas Aa. Claerr & Richard Gargan, The Role of Songs in Foreign Language
Classroom, OMLTA Journal, Vol. I, 1984, p.29.
4
achievement from fourth semester students of English Education Department UIN
Jakarta.
D. Formulation of the Study
The writer formulated the problem as follow: was there any relationship
between the listening frequency to English songs and students’ listening
achievement?
E. The Objective of the Study
The objective of the study is to find out the whether there is any relationship
between listening frequency to English songs by fourth semester students of
Department of English Education of UIN Jakarta with their listening achievement.
F. The Significance of the Study
This study is expected to provide theoretical, practical and professional
benefits.
1. Theoretical Significance
The research finding can be used to enrich the theories and method regarding
the use of English song toward students’ listening skill development.
2. Practical Significance
Practically, the research finding provides the information to the English
teachers in teaching listening by using songs, so they can teach students in an
effective and joyful way. While for student, it will give information on direct
contribution to both students’ language development in listening skill and
successful achievement in listening test.
3. Professional Significance
5
The research finding provides information to English teacher on how
listening to English songs can develop students’ listening skill. Thus, it is true that
the used of English songs develop students’ listening ability. In addition, it gives
wide space to the coming researcher who would like to do a research in the same
topic in broader scope and larger samples which can be used as reference.
6
CHAPTER II
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
A. Listening
1. Definition of Listening
Listening is often confused with hearing. While hearing is biological process
that can be scientifically explained, listening is neurological cognitive regarding
the processing of auditory stimuli received by auditory system. Listening comes
from word ―listen‖ (/ˈlɪs(ə)n/). Roland Barthes, a linguist, distinguishes between
hearings and listening, stating, "Hearing is a physiological phenomenon; listening
is a psychological act." Barthes also states that "whereas for centuries listening
could be defined as an intentional act of audition...today it is granted the power
(and virtually the function) of playing over unknown spaces" including
unconscious forms.1
Listening involves a number of basic processes, some hold on to linguistic
competence, it also depend on previous knowledge that is not consequently of
completely linguistic nature and some depending on psychological variables
which is influence the mobilization of this competence and knowledge in the
appropriate task situations.2 Harmer stated listening is a receptive skill in which
people gain idea based on what they heard. 3 From the definition above, it can be
conclude that listening is an activity to paying attention to someone or something
in order to understand someone saying.
1 Roland Barthes, The Responsibility of Forms, (New York: New York Hill and Wang,
1985), p.45 2 Arif Saricoban, The Teaching Listening, The Internet TESL Journal (Retrieved from
http://iteslj.org/Articles/Saricoban-Listening.html on 24 December 2015), Vol. V, No. 12, 1999,
p.1 3 Jeremy Harmer, The Practice of English Language Teaching, (New York: Longman.
2011) Third Edition, p. 181.
7
2. Types and Process of Listening Activities
a. Types of Listening Activities
There are many types of listening depends on the purpose itself. In here the
writer will explain the types of listening that can students in developing their
listening skills.
1) Active Listening
Active listening is the art of listening for meaning. For us to gain meaning
from the words of another person, we need to be listening carefully.4 Meaning is
not necessarily assured even when we are actively listening, but we will at least
know that we don’t understand, and can therefore ask the correct questions to gain
enlightenment.5
Active listening focuses attention on the speaker. The listener gives verbal or
non-verbal feedback by asking questions and/or by paraphrasing what the speaker
said.6 In this situation, the listener uses his other senses to go beyond the words
spoken.
2) Critical listening
The critical listening is also known: as evaluative, judgmental or interpretive
listening.7 The main goal of this type of listening is to evaluate the message with
logic while analyzing the different arguments provided by the speaker.8 It requires
some analysis, judgment and critical thinking. It is necessary in order to be able to
criticize the strength of the evidence and to determine the motive of the speaker.
However, critical listening is not an easy task to accomplish because it is needed
to absorb and evaluate the information together.
3) Content Listening
4 "Active Listening‖. Inspiration. White Dove Books. (Retrieved from http://www.white
dovebooks.com on 20 Desember 2014). 5 Ibid
6 Larry Alan Nadig, Tips on Effective Listening, (Retrieved from
http://www.drnadig.com/listening.htm on 24 Desember 2015) 7 Culbertson. H., Classroom listening skills. (Retrieved from
http://home.snu.edu/~hCULBERT/listen.htm on 20 Desember 2015 8 Culbertson. H, Ibid
8
This type of listening involves understanding and retaining the information
provided by the speaker.9 It also requires to identify the main key points of the
message and to find cues by doing a summary of it. Moreover, it is important to
understand different sounds and tones provide by the speaker. However, some
other factors need to be taken under consideration such as phonology, vocabulary,
grammar, general discourse, and informational discourse.
To effectively apply content listening, it is needed once again identify the
main idea or the key points of the message. Then, the next thing to do is to ask
questions for clarifications if the message was misunderstood. This will increase
the level of understanding of the message transmitted.
b. Process of Listening activities
1) Pre- Listening
During the pre- listening phase, teachers need to recognize that all students
bring different backgrounds to the listening experience. Beliefs, attitudes and
biases of the listeners will affect the understanding of the massage. In these
addition to being aware of these factors, teachers should know students how their
backgrounds affect the massage they receive.
Before listening, students need assistance to activate what they already know
about the ideas they are going to hear. Simply being told the topic is not enough.
Pre- listening activities are required to establish what is already known about the
topic, to build necessary background, and to set the purposes for listening.
Students need to understand that the act of listening not just hearing but also
thinking, as well as a good deal of interest and information that both speaker and
listener must have in common.10
2) During Listening
Students need to understand the implications of rate in the listening process.
Nichols stated that he found people listen and think at four times the normal
9 Culbertson. H., Ibid
10 Martha King L. & Gay Su Pinnell, Access to Meaning/ Spoken and Written Language,
Collage of Education Ohio State University,Vol. 23 No. 3, 1984, p.177
9
conversation rate.11
Students have to be encouraged the use the ―rate gape‖ to
actively process the message. There are several things students can encouraged to
do:
“They can run a mental commentary on it; they can doubt it, talk back to it, or
extend it. They can rehearse in order to remember it; that is, they repeat
interesting points back to themselves. They can formulate questions to ask the
speaker … jot down the key or key phrase … They can wonder if what they are
listening to is true, or what motives the speaker has saying in it, or whether the
speaker is revealing personal feelings rather than objectives assessments.”12
3) After Listening
Students need to act upon what they have heard to clarify meaning and extend
their thinking. Well-planned post- listening activities are just as important as those
before and during13
. Some examples follow:
1) To begin with, students can ask questions of themselves and the speaker to
clarify their understanding and confirm their assumptions.
2) Hook and Evans (1982) suggest that the post-mortem is a very useful device.
Students should talk about what the speaker said, question statements of
opinion, amplify certain remarks, and identify parallel incidents from life and
literature.
3) Students can summarize a speaker's presentation orally, in writing, or as
an outline. In addition to the traditional outline format, students could use
time lines, flow charts, ladders, circles, diagrams, webs, or maps.
4) Students can review their notes and add information that they did not have an
opportunity to record during the speech.
5) Students can analyse and evaluate critically what they have heard.
6) Students can be given opportunities to engage activities in that build on and
develop concepts acquired during an oral presentation. These may include
writing (e.g., response journal, learning log, or composition), reading (e.g.,
11
R. G. Nichols, Factors in listening comprehension, Speech Monographs, (London:
Routledge, 1948), 15. 12
C. Temple & J.W. Gillet, Language arts: Learning processes and teaching practices.
Glenview, (Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Company, 1989), p. 14 13
Thomas G. Devine, Listening Skills Schoolwide: Activites and Programs, ERIC Clearing
on Reading and Communication Skills, 1982, p. 27
10
further research on a topic or a contradictory viewpoint), art or drama (e.g.,
designing a cover jacket after a book talk or developing a mock trial
concerning the topic through drama in role).
3. The Purpose of Listening
In everyday situations there are a great number of reasons for listening.
Brown and Yule divided the purposes into two main categories interactional and
transactional.14
Interactional purpose convey social reasons of communication
such as chatting at a party whereas transactional is used to express exchange of
information such as to follow instruction. 15
4. Listening Achievement
To know whether students already mastering what they have been learnt and
how much progress their done can be proved in how high the achievement they
got. To perceive students’ achievement, teachers must do an evaluation after the
learning process is done. The evaluation can show whether the students already
understand what have been taught.
According to Gronlund achievement is something that students have
learned.16
It means that achievement is conclusion of assessment and evaluation in
learning for extents of time. It cannot be achieved id the students never attain it
before. Furthermore, M. Chabib Thoha stated achievement the expanse that a
person has achieved.17
It means that after learning in extents of time, students will
get the result. The result that students get it is called achievement. Achievement
can be obtainable through test.
So it can conclude that listening skill achievement is students’ ability in
listening skill course that is acquired through test score. Achievement only can be
achieved after students occur their learning in listening course. The students will
14 Gillian Brown & George Yule, Discourse Analysis, (Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 1983), p.1) 15
Tricia Hedge, Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. (Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 2000), p. 28 16
Norman E. Gronlund, Measurement and Evaluation in Teaching, (New York:
Macmillian, 1976), p.131 17
M. Chaib Thoha, Teknik Evaluasi Pendidikan, (Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo persada,
2003), p.44
11
achieve their intent in listening if they catch on what they learn and have a good
result in listening test.
B. Song
1. Definition of Song
According to Hornby, song is a piece of music that is sung.18
Futonge also
said that song is a language package that combine culture, vocabulary, listening,
grammar and also as a moderator for other language skills in just few rhymes.
Based on definitions above, it can be stated that song is a good tool that can
be used in lesson. Because song can provide relax learning and it can makes the
learning process can be more fun for students. By learning vocabulary through
song, it can make students easier in remembering new vocabulary. Practice
listening through song can make the learning process more interesting. With this,
students will be more motivated to practice their listening without any pressure.
Song will always be connected with music. Music can be an important tool to
achieve relaxation and harmony to improve effectivity of learning. Music is
chosen and determined in proper way to help people in acquiring and mastering
material easily. It was said to produce alpha state in which the mind was relaxated
and meditative but remained receptive.19
2. Physiological Response to Music
Music has physiological and pedagogical benefit. The physiological benefits
from music are lowering anxiety, heartbeat, pain and blood pressure. On the other
hand, music also can increase respiratory rate, recovery and tension relief.
Listening to music is proved change in blood pressure, blood flow, pulse and
other activity. Average human heartbeat is from 70—100 beat per second. That is
18
Edgar Alberto, The Use of Song as a Tool to Work on Listening and Culture in ESL
Classes, Scientific Information System Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the
Caribbean, Spain and Portugal, No.15, 2010, p.124 19
Claudia Smith Salcedo, The Effect of Songs in Foreign Language Classroom on Text
Recall and Involuntary Mental Rehearsal, Journal of Collage Teaching & Learning, Vo. 7, No. 6,
2010, p.19
12
why music that have tempo around 60—80MM/minute will help students to be
more relax as it corresponds with students’ physiological rhythm.20
The music class consists of singing, instrument musical playing, movement,
creativity, and listening activity. The story telling program was aimed to
developing language skills for early reading such as listening, organization,
comprehension, memory skills. Data may have been influenced by different
teaching styles and learning media in class.
Song is a musical composition that comes from human voice (usually
accompanied by other musical instrument), that features words (lyrics). The word
in song usually sounds poetic, rhyming nature, although sometimes it also
contains religious verse or free prose. Song can be divided into many different
forms which depends on the criteria that used. Song is divided into art songs,
popular songs, and folk songs.21
Song has an element that similar to speech and
poetry, which is the unique form. Song and speech, both was produced from vocal
that linguistically meaningful and have melody. In the other hand, both song and
poetry use words to convey the meaning.
Music or song can be used for teaching foreign language. Song can create a
nice atmosphere inside the class, because the students will consider it as
entertainment than learning. This can happen if a teacher use popular song in
learning activity in class, popular songs is part of their youth culture. This kind of
song will attract young people, when students listening to a song they will identify
the singer and will try to listen to the words so they can understand the meaning of
the song. Because of this, songs also useful in introducing rhyme of the language
and give an information to the students about the culture of the songs; the singer.
Popular song that used in learning foreign language is very important to make
learning process more fun. Songs will motivate students to be more active in
learning process, so they feel more confident in learning process and wants to
continue the learning process.
20
Ibid, p.26 21
―Song‖ (Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/song on 3 Desember 2015)
13
Song or music in education should be used for more than tension relief, or
leisure time entertainment, roles often assigned to music by school curriculum.22
According to Falioni, the addition of music to foreign language class as teaching
method may be away to focus students’ attention and produce more committed
learner.23
In learning language, the role media like songs is important to achieve
learning objective that has been decided. To get information from the teacher, first
students need to listen to the teacher’s explanation, but in the other hand student
did not pay attention the teacher. This happen because students think that
teacher’s explanation is boring. Because of that, a good song should not be
discarded after it has been taught, but can be heard at intervals again and again. In
this way, student will continue to listen, understand and enjoy it. The choice of the
songs depends on what is available; it can be from what school provided or what
teacher has or anything that can be easily acquired. Naturally, in teaching listening
through songs, teacher hopes that students can enjoy learning language through
songs and also students can learn language in an authentic form, but the
distinction is valid one.
The linguistic content of the songs should not be too difficult, and the words
should be based on compromise between teacher’s taste and those of their
students. Students unlikely to attend well to songs they do not like- but equally,
the teachers should enjoy the songs they use. Otherwise, they will probably not
teach them very well.24
3. The Use of Songs as Authentic Listening Material
The use of authentic material is important factor to take into consideration
when designing listening skills material. With using authentic material, students
are given the chance to develop the skills needed to comprehend and to use
22
Claudia Smith Salcedo, Op cit, p.11
23 J.W. Falioni, Music as Means to Enhance Cultural Awareness and Literacy in Foreign
Language Classroom, Mid-Atlantic Journal of Foreign Language Pedagogy, Vol.1, 1993, p. 99
24
Penny Ur, Teaching Listening Comprehension, (London: Cambrige University Press,
2009), p.66
14
language that is commonly found in real situations. Therefore, it is important the
opportunity whatever possible to expose students to example of real language
usage to help them become more communicatively competent.
According to Ur, listening activity based on simulated real life situation and
likely to be most interesting and motivating to do than contrived textbook
comprehension exercise.25
The following features characterize real life listening
activity:
1. We listen with purpose and with certain expecting.
2. We make an immediately response to what we hear
3. We see the person we are listening too.
4. There are some visual or environment clues as to the meaning of what is
heard.26
5. Stretches of hand discourse is spontaneous and differs from formal spoken
prose in the amount of redundancy, noise and colloquialism, and it is auditory
character.
4. Factors Contributing to Listening Comprehension of Song
The possibility in using songs in English as a foreign language class has been
actively considering for the last two decades. Song is considered to become one of
the materials in English class because it has many language values in it. It is
possible to suggest among the methodological purpose with songs are used in
classroom; it is possible to rank the following:
1. Practicing the rhythm, stress and intonation patterns of the English language.
2. Teaching vocabulary, especially in the vocabulary reinforcement stage.
3. Teaching grammar. In this respect are used by teachers to investigating
tenses.
4. Practicing speaking. For this purpose, songs and mainly their lyrics are
employed as a stimulus for class discussion.
25
Penny Ur, A Course in Language Teaching: Practice and Theory, (London: Cambrige
University Press, 1996), p.107 26
Ibid
15
5. Teaching listening comprehension
6. Developing writing skill. For this purpose songs can be used in a variety
ways.27
According to Lynch28
, there are three factors that contribute in listening
comprehension to song, they are:
1. Use of new vocabulary, idioms and expressions – it need to be address the
new material offered in each song. This includes grammar, vocabulary and
usage.
2. Pronunciation and accent of the singer – every native speaker doesn’t
pronounce or sing in the same accent. Students may be exposed to an accent
which is outside the realm of what they might normally hear in context.
3. Use of grammar and new structure – Song writers and singers are notoriously
―loose‖ when it comes to use of grammar, structure, pronunciation, stress and
other language factors applied to songs. The teacher must be prepared for
this.
In additional, use of songs in teaching and learning English as a foreign
language is felt much needed. From songs we can learn many things such as
vocabulary, grammar, speaking, writing and especially listening.
5. Listening to a English Songs as Habit
There are two perspectives on habits, coming from different academic
disciplines; psychology and sociology. Firstly, in psychology, habit is considered
as psychological construct that influence behavior.29
In habit as behavior the key
points are few factors like attitude, norms and intention, which involve frequency
and automaticity and stable context. Furthermore, in psychology, habit is
27
Ibid 28
Larry M. Lynch, Using Popular Songs to Improve Language Listening Comprehension
Skill, (Retrieved from http://esl4free.blogspot.com/2008/02/can-music-improve-your-students on
24 December 2015), p.4 29
Andrew Darnton, Habits, Routines and Sustainable Lifestyle. (London: Department of
Enviroment and Food and Rural Affairs), p.2
16
considered as routine practice.30
This is why it will be easy for students’ for
developing their listening skill by listening to English song as habit. Different
from psychology perspective, the sociology perspective is not relying in
individual behavior, but also interaction between individuals and social world.
Practice theory also presents three key elements that hold routine practice. Those
three elements are Materials (objects and infrastructure), competence (skills and
know-how), and images (meanings, ideas and interpretations).
6. Benefit of Song
By using song in classroom, students can practice their listening skills and
increase their cultural knowledge. Almost any song can be used in to practice
listening skills in foreign language classroom. The pronunciation and rhythm
lessons are same with children’s songs and the lesson may help students become
more interested in different types of songs. Practicing reading the lyric, studying
the vocabulary, and listening to various songs can help students become more
familiar with popular song and make them more confident in their ability to listen
and understand the world around them.
The other benefits of using songs in the classroom are song can be used:
1. To present a topic, language point, lexis, etc.
2. To present language point, lexis, etc.
3. To focus on common learners errors in a more direct way
4. To encourage intensive and extensive listening
5. To stimulate discussions of attitudes and feelings
6. To encourage creativity and use of imagination
7. To provide a relaxed classroom atmosphere
8. To bring variety and fun to learning31
30
Ibid, p.3 31
Ibid
17
C. Relevant Study
The first previous study was conduct by Robert E. Beasly from Franklin
Collage, Indiana, USA and Yuangshan Chuang from I-Shou University, Taiwan.
This study adds to the body of empirical knowledge regarding the use of music in
the EFL classroom. This original investigation centered on the following question:
Does listening repetition, song likeability, and/or song understandability influence
learning environment perceptions, learning perceptions, and/or learning outcomes
in Taiwanese EFL learners engaged in web-based music study?
The subjects in this study consisted of 196 Taiwanese students. Correlation
and regression analyses were performed to determine if any statistically
significant relationships existed between the study's variables of interest. The
results suggest that both song likeability and song understandability significantly
and positively influence web-based learning environment enjoyment, which in
turn significantly and positively influences learning perceptions. It makes sense
that learner feelings about the songs would be positively tied to their level of
enjoyment of this particular learning method, since the songs are such a major
aspect of it.32
The similarity between the research by Robert E. Beasly and the research that
writer conducted is that both of the research wants to see whether listening
repetition through music can improve students’ listening skill. The difference is
Robert E. Beasly used a website that designed to facilitate his investigation and in
writer’s research, she used questionnaire and test score to get the data.
The second previous study was conduct by Volkan Kahraman. His study aims
to find out the parameters affecting the listening comprehension in a song
listening activity. He examines the use and selection of songs in listening
comprehension classes. 3 students at elementary level listened to 9 songs in
different genres and were asked to fill in the blanks in the lyrics provided in three
listening cycles. The best-comprehended songs were in acoustic soft rock and soft
rock genre. As teachers of English as a foreign language, we teach listening skills
32 Robert E. Beasly, Web-Based Music Study: The Effects of Listening Repetition, Song
Likeability and Song Understandability on EFL Learning Perceptions and Outcomes, TESL-EJ
(Retrieved from http://tesl-ej.org/ej46/a3.html on 23 Desember 2015), Vol. 12, No. 2, 2008. p.13
18
through songs at times both as a part of our method and due to demands of
students to spice up the course content. From his research it is turned to be true
developing listening through song will help students improve their listening
skill.33
The similarity between the research by Volkan Kahraman and the research
that the writer conducted is that both of these researches wanted to prove that by
listening to English songs can help to improve foreign students’ listening skill.
The difference is Volkan Kahraman’s research is more focus on the selection and
genre that used to improve students’ listening skill and the research that the writer
conducted is more focus to know whether there is relationship between listening
to English songs and listening skill achievement.
The third previous study was from Trần Thị Oanh. He conducted his research
in ITC Foreign Language Center in Hai Duong, Vietnam. He found out that both
students and teacher there agree that listening skill is the most difficult among
four language skills. So he suggested to applying English songs as an extra
material to teach listening skill. The result form the experimental lesson showed
that they had a positive attitude to using of English songs in class. It motivates
them to study during the study a lot. And turns out with listen to songs, the
students in ITC Foreign Language Center help them to develop their ability in
listening.34
The similarity between the research by Trần Thị Oanh and the research that
the writer conducted is both of these researches wants shows the important role of
English songs in teaching listening as one of language skill. The difference is Trần
Thị Oanh’s research is more focused on how the teachers and students’ attitudes
to listening skill and how their attitudes in using songs in teaching listening skill.
The writer’s research is more focused to investigate whether there is relationship
between listening to English song and students’ listening achievement.
33 Volkan Kahraman, The Use of Songs in Listening Comprehension in English, Dil
Dergisi, Vol.149, 2008, p.50 34
Trần Thị Oanh, The Use of Songs to Improve Listening Skills for Students at ITC Foreign
Language Center in Hai Duong, (Thesis, University of Language and International Study, Hai
Duong, 2011), p. 1
19
D. Conceptual Framework
Listening to English songs can provide pleasure, which can drive a feeling of
interest in listening to English songs in students’ daily life. Music or songs is an
important trend in modern society. People can utilize songs as presentation
context, as reinforcement materials, as vehicle to teach language skills and as
medium to bridge the learning process with modern life.
For young people as students’ listening to English songs frequently can be the
easiest and the most fun way to improve their listening skill. From this, students’
will encourage themselves to expand their frequency in listening to English songs.
And for 4th
semester students’ of English education department, listening to
English songs can help them to get higher achievement in Listening subject. They
can practice their listening anywhere and anytime they want.
After studying the concepts about students’ frequency in listening to English
songs and students’ listening achievement and also the theoretical relation
between both of it, the writer can arrange the conceptual framework to: the writer
assume there is positive correlation between frequency in listening to English
songs and listening achievement. In other word, if frequency in listening to
English songs is high, the listening achievement will be high too.
E. Theoretical Hypothesis
Related to the problems mentioned earlier, the writer proposed the hypothesis
as follows:
20
Ho : There is no relationship between listening frequency to English songs and
students’ listening achievement.
Ha : There is relationship between listening frequency to English songs and
students’ listening achievement.
21
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METODOLOGY
A. Place and Time of Study
The writer conducts the research at fourth semester students of English
Education Department of UIN Jakarta academic year 2014/2015. This research
started on June 20th
, 2015 until July 20th,
2015.
B. Population and Sample
The population of this study was the fourth
semester students of the
Department of English Education of UIN Jakarta, which were consists of 62
students. The students’ was divided into three classes. As sample, 62 students
were chosen as participants who were selected purposively for sampling.
C. Method of Study
The method of this study is quantitative method. Quantitative method is
essentially about collecting numerical data to explain a particular phenomenon.1
In this research, quantitative method is used to score the listening test and score
from questionnaire. The data from questionnaire are calculated to know whether
there is any significance correlation between students’ frequency in listening to
English Songs and their listening achievement. The writer analyze questionnaire
about the students’ listening frequency to English songs using Pearson Correlation
Product Moment through SPSS, to determine whether there is correlation with
students’ listening achievement.
1 Daniel Muijs, Doing Quantitaive Research in Education with SPSS, (London: Sage
Publication Ltd., 2004), p.2
22
D. Design of the Study
This is a correlational study defines the extent to that two or more quantitative
variables are associated, and it does so by using a correlation coefficient.2
Correlational study can also show how high the correlation between two variables
is.3 In correlational designs, investigators use statistical test to describe and
measure the degree of association or relationship between two variables and this
statistic is called correlational coefficient.
E. Techniques of Data Collection
Instrument of this study are questionnaire about students’ listening frequency
in to English songs as variable X and their listening achievement that taken from
listening IV final test as variable Y.
1. Questionnaire
Questionnaire is any written instruments that present respondents with a
series of questions or statements to which they are to react either by writing out
the answers or selecting from among existing answers.4 In this research, students
are supposed to answers the written questionnaire and selecting one of the options.
The questionnaire consists of 5 items with 5 options each. The scoring of the
questionnaire uses Likert scale, which is one of scaling technique of rating scale.
It is requiring the respondent to make an evaluate judgement of the target by
marking one of a series of categories organized into a scale.5 To scale this
questionnaire, the writer used Likert scale, which is typically used to investigate
how respondents feel about a series of question.6 Before giving the questionnaire
to the samples of this research, the writer did validity test and reliability test of the
questionnaire.
a) Validity Instrument
2 Jack R. Fraenkel & Norman E. Wallen, How to Design and Evaluate Research in
Education, 7th Edition, (New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., p.328 3 Suharsimi Arikunto, Prosedur Penelitian, (Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2013), p.313
4 Zoltan Dorney, Tatsuya Taguchi, Questionnaire in Second Language Research, (Madison
Avenue, New York, Routledge: 2010), p. 4 5 Ibid, p.26
6 James Dean Brown, Using Survey in Language Program, (New York: Cambrige
University Press, 2001), p.40
23
Validation of the instrument was conducted to see whether the instrument
capable to collect the data or not. The writer got the standard coefficient validity
minimum for this instrument with N=20 and coefficient significance level 5%.
The coefficient validity is 0,444. To see validity instrument, the researcher did it
through SPSS 22 program.
There were 10 questions that the writer used for validation. From these 10
questions, there were 5 questions passed the validation and can be used for this
research. The calculation of validity test can be seen in appendix. The indicator of
the questionnaire is taken from Andrew Darnton theory about understanding habit.
b) The Reliability Test
The researcher used SPSS 22 in order to get the reliability of the
questionnaire the result can be seen as below:
Table 3.1
The Result of Reliability Test
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items
.916 40
From the result, it can be seen that rresult = 0,916. Then the researcher
compared to rtable with N=20 and 5% significance level, that is rtable = 0,444. It can
be concluded that this instrument reliable because rresult > rtable = 0,916 > 0,444.
c) The Normality Test
The result of normality test is used to see whether the items of questionnaire
are distributed normal or not. Based on normality test through Kolmogorov-
Smirnov on SPSS program, the researcher got that the items of the questionnaire
is distributed normal. The normality test result can be seen below.
24
Table 3.2
The Result of Normality Test
One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Unstandardized
Residual
N 23
Normal Parametersa,b
Mean .0000000
Std. Deviation 9.52259074
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .172
Positive .172
Negative -.145
Test Statistic .172
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .074c
a. Test distribution is Normal.
b. Calculated from data.
c. Lilliefors Significance Correction.
With α = 0,05 and N = 20, ɑmax = 0,074 and ɑtable = 0,444 it can be described
ɑmax < ɑtable then can be concluded that the items of the instrument are normal.
2. Listening Subject Final Test
Participants’ listening score is collected to determine students’ listening skill
achievement. Their scores will be obtained from their latest listening test
(listening IV subject final test) that will be held by Department of English
Education of UIN Jakarta. The score that will be used is their raw score from the
test. It means that scores that participants get from several factors such as
attendance, attitude, participations in class, etc. will not be included
F. Techniques of Data Analysis
The participants’ frequency of listening to English songs will be further
calculated along with their listening scores using Pearson Product Moment
Correlation Coefficient, in SPSS 22. It is intended to determine whether there was
correlation between to variables or not. The formula of the Pearson Product
Moment Correlation Coefficient is as follow:
25
∑ (∑ ) (∑ )
√* ∑ (∑ ) +* ∑ (∑ ) +
rxy = The Correlation Coefficient
X = The Questionnaire Score
Y = The Listening Test Score
N = The Number of Respondent
∑X = The Sum of Questionnaire Score
∑Y = The Sum of Listening Test Score
∑X2 = The Sum of the Square of Questionnaire Score
∑Y2 = The Sum of the Square of Listening Test Score
∑XY = The Sum of Multiplication of questionnaire and Listening Test
Score
The result of correlation coefficient is then being interpreted to find out it is
strength. The following is to interpret the result of correlation coefficient:7
Table 3.3
Correlation Coefficient Table
Product Moment (r) Correlation
0.00—0.20 Very Low
0.20—0.40 Low
7 Suharsimi Arikunto, Ibid, p.319
26
0.40—0.70 Moderate
0.70—0.90 High
0.90—1.00 Very High
G. Statistical Hypothesizes
Statistical Hypothesizes wit: significance level 5% was formulated as follow:
H0 : ρ < 0
H1 : ρ ≥ 0
27
CHAPTER IV
RESEARCH FINDING AND INTERPRETATION
A. Data Description
As mentioned in the previous chapter, to get the data, the writer conducted the
research by giving questionnaire about students’ listening frequency to English
songs. In this research, the writer didn’t give the students’ treatment about songs.
It is pure about students’ listening frequency to English songs.
The data about students’ listening achievement were taken from listening IV
final test score. This test was conducted on 23rd
June 2015 by Miss Neneng
Sunengsih as the lecturer. The score that taken for this research only the final test
result. Other score such students’ attendances and midterm test will not be
included in this research.
After obtaining all the data, the researcher analyzed the data to know the
relationship between students’ listening frequency to English song and their
listening achievement.
a) The result of students’ listening frequency to English songs (X Variable)
In this research, students’ listening frequency to English songs is considered
as independent variable (X Variable). The writer gave the questionnaire to 62
students’ fourth semester of Department of English Education of UIN Jakarta.
Before the researcher gave the questionnaire to the students’, the validation of
questionnaire was conducted. The result of the questionnaire is described on the
table below.
28
Table 4.1
Questionnaire Scores
(X Variable)
N X
1 14
2 18
3 11
4 8
5 19
6 17
7 19
8 21
9 10
10 20
11 11
12 16
13 11
14 18
15 17
16 15
17 14
18 19
19 15
20 19
21 19
22 20
23 16
24 17
25 16
26 19
27 13
28 15
29 14
30 20
31 11
32 12
33 21
34 19
35 22
29
N Y
36 23
37 14
38 9
39 17
40 18
41 22
42 16
43 11
44 18
45 14
46 19
47 17
48 12
49 18
50 15
51 15
52 11
53 18
54 16
55 19
56 20
57 22
58 21
59 17
60 19
61 7
62 17
∑N = 62 ∑X = 1011
30
a) The Result of Listening Test (Y Variable)
In this research, listening test is considered as dependent variable (Y
Variable). The listening test that used in this researched was Listening IV final
test that held by Department of English Education. The result of the listening IV
final test is described in table below:
Table 4.2
Listening Test Score
(Y Variable)
N Y
1 71.25
2 93.75
3 97.75
4 43
5 85
6 65
7 72.5
8 93.75
9 48.75
10 92.5
11 57.5
12 86.25
13 63.75
14 72.5
15 70
16 72.5
17 72.5
18 70
19 86.25
20 87.5
21 80
22 90
23 76.25
24 75
25 71.25
26 85
27 61.25
28 68.75
29 63.75
31
N Y
30 81.25
31 56.25
32 53.75
33 81.25
34 83.75
35 86.25
36 80
37 67.5
38 68
39 80
40 71.25
41 90
42 51.25
43 68.75
44 92.5
45 65
46 85
47 66.25
48 61.25
49 85
50 60
51 67.5
52 68.75
53 85
54 77.5
55 76.25
56 86.25
57 71.25
58 86.25
59 75
60 80
61 47.5
N Y
62 71.25
∑N = 62 ∑Y = 4600
By using SPSS 22, the researcher got the summary as follows:
32
Table 4.3
The Summary of Questionnaire Scores (X) and Listening Achievement (Y)
Parameter X Y
Minimum Score 7 43.00
Maximum Score 23 97.75
Standard Deviation 3.75 12.48
Mean 16.31 74.19
Median 17 72.50
Mode 19 71.25
Sum 1011 4600
B. Data Analysis
a) The Histogram
Through the histogram the researcher can see the distribution of the data from
each variable is normal or not.
Figure 4.1
The Students’ Frequency in Listening to English Songs (X) (Questionnaire
Score)
33
Figure 4.2
The Listening Achievement (Listening IV Score) (Y)
From the result of the histogram of X variable and Y variable, the curves
from both histograms are more leaning to the right side. From this we can
conclude that data distribution of X variable and Y variable are normal.
b) The Normality Test
The normality test was conducted to see if the data distribution was normal or
not. The researcher used Kolmogrov-Smirnov in SPSS 22. The result of normality
test is described below.
Table 4.4
Normality Test of the Data
One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Questionnaire_
Scores
ListeningIV_Sco
res
N 62 62
Normal Parametersa,b
Mean 16.31 74.1935
Std. Deviation 3.749 12.47657
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .122 .097
Positive .083 .070
Negative -.122 -.097
Test Statistic .122 .097
34
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .023c .200
c,d
a. Test distribution is Normal.
b. Calculated from data.
c. Lilliefors Significance Correction.
d. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
The criteria for normality test are if significance value > 0.05 the data is
normal and if significance value < 0.05 the data is not normal. Significance value
for X variable is 0.023 > 0.05 and significance value for Y variable is 0.200 >
0.05. From this result, it can be conclude that data from both variables are normal
because these two variables have significance value > 0.05.
a) The Linearity test
Linearity test was conducted to see if X variable and Y variable has a linear
relationship or not. This test was calculated through SPSS 22.
Table 4.5
The Linearity Test of the Data
ANOVA Table
Sum of
Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
ListeningIV_Scores *
Questionnaire_Scores
Between Groups (Combined) 5915.322 16 369.708 4.647 .000
Linearity 4557.795 1 4557.795 57.287 .000
Deviation from Linearity 1357.527 15 90.502 1.138 .353
Within Groups 3580.231 45 79.561
Total 9495.552 61
The criteria for linearity test are if significance value >0.05 there is linear
relationship between X variable and Y variable and if significance value <0.05
there is no linear relationship between X variable and Y variable. Significance
value for this linearity test is 0.353 > 0.05. From this result, it can be concluded
that X variable and Y variable have linear relationship because these two variables
have significance value > 0.05.
35
a) Correlation Coefficient
The data that has been collected were analyzed using Pearson Product of
Moment Formula:
∑ (∑ ) (∑ )
√{ ∑ (∑ ) }{ ∑ (∑ ) }
Before the writer does the calculation, the data were described as below:
Table 4.6
Data Analysis Table
No. X Y XY X2 Y
2
1 14 71.25 997.5 196 5076.56
2 18 93.75 1687.5 324 8789.06
3 11 97.75 1075.25 121 9555.06
4 8 43 344 64 1849
5 19 85 1615 361 7225
6 17 65 1105 289 4225
7 19 72.5 1377.5 361 5256.25
8 21 93.75 1968.75 441 8789.06
9 10 48.75 487.5 100 2376.56
10 20 92.5 1850 400 8556.25
11 11 57.5 632.5 121 3306.25
12 16 86.25 1380 256 7439.06
13 11 63.75 701.25 121 4064.06
14 18 72.5 1305 324 5256.25
15 17 70 1190 289 4900
16 15 72.5 1087.5 225 5256.25
17 14 72.5 1015 196 5256.25
18 19 70 1330 361 4900
19 15 86.25 1293.75 225 7439.06
36
No. X Y XY X2 Y
2
20 19 87.5 1662.5 361 7656.25
21 19 80 1520 361 6400
22 20 90 1800 400 8100
23 16 76.25 1220 256 5814.06
24 17 75 1275 289 5625
25 16 71.25 1140 256 5076.56
26 19 85 1615 361 7225
27 13 61.25 796.25 169 3751.56
28 15 68.75 1031.25 225 4726.56
29 14 63.75 892.5 196 4064.06
30 20 81.25 1625 400 6601.56
31 11 56.25 618.75 121 3164.06
32 12 53.75 645 144 2889.06
33 21 81.25 1706.25 441 6601.56
34 19 83.75 1591.25 361 7014.06
35 22 86.25 1897.5 484 7439.06
36 23 80 1840 529 6400
37 14 67.5 945 196 4556.25
38 9 68 612 81 4624
39 17 80 1360 289 6400
40 18 71.25 1282.5 324 5076.56
41 22 90 1980 484 8100
42 16 51.25 820 256 2627
43 11 68.75 756.25 121 4726.56
44 18 92.5 1665 324 8556.25
45 14 65 910 196 4225
46 19 85 1615 361 7225
47 17 66.25 1126.25 289 4389.06
48 12 61.25 735 144 3751.56
49 18 85 1530 324 7225
37
No. X Y XY X2
Y2
50 15 60 900 225 3600
51 15 67.5 1012.5 225 4556.25
52 11 68.75 756.25 121 4726.56
53 18 85 1530 324 7225
54 16 77.5 1240 256 6006.25
55 19 76.25 1448.75 361 5814.06
56 20 86.25 1725 400 7439.06
57 22 71.25 1567.5 484 5076.56
58 21 86.25 1811.25 441 7439.06
59 17 75 1275 289 5625
60 19 80 1520 361 6400
61 7 47.5 332.5 49 2256.25
62 17 71.25 1211.25 289 5076.56
TOTAL 1011 4600 76986.25 17343 350785.88
∑ (∑ ) (∑ )
√* ∑ (∑ ) +* ∑ (∑ ) +
( ) ( )( )
√, ( ) ( ) -, ( ) ( ) -
√( )( )
√( )( )
√
38
To make sure the calculation above, the research used SPSS 22 program. The use
of SPSS 22 is to know whether the calculation that researcher did manually was
correct and to make sure that there is no mismatching in researcher calculation. The
calculation of SPSS 22 was described such as follow:
Table 4.7
The Result of Correlation Calculation
Correlations
Questionnaire_
Scores
ListeningIV_Sco
res
Questionnaire_Scores Pearson Correlation 1 .693**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 62 62
ListeningIV_Scores Pearson Correlation .693** 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 62 62
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
The result of correlation between Students’ frequency in listening to English
songs and their listening achievement is 0.693. This is concluded that there is
moderate correlation (0.40—0.70) between X variable and Y variable, based on rxy >
rtable ; 0.693 > 0.254. It can also be stated that there is correlation between students’
frequency in listening to English songs and their listening skill.
C. Data Interpretation
Based on the calculation above, is shows that correlation value rxy 0.693. From
the previous chapter, the statistical hypothesizes was already stated as follow:
a. rxy is the same or higher than rtable, the Ha is accepted
b. rxy is lower than rtable, Ha is rejected
39
From the result above, the researcher got that rxy > rtable ; 0.693 > 0.254 that
means Ho rejected and Ha IS accepted. In other words there is relationship between
listening frequency to English song and students’ listening Achievement.
Table 4.8
Correlation Coefficient Table
Product Moment (r) Correlation
0.00—0.20 Very Low
0.20—0.40 Low
0.40—0.70 Moderate
0.70—0.90 High
0.90—1.00 Very High
From the result, it shows that correlation coefficient is 0.693. It means that there
is moderate correlation between listening frequency to English songs and students’
listening achievement. The moderate correlation means the correlation tends to the
positive value and there is no negative correlation.
To sum up, the data interpretation shows a finding that listening frequency to
English songs and students’ listening achievement correlates each other. Listening to
English songs frequency gives contribution 0.693 to students listening achievement.
It means that the higher the listening to English songs frequency, the better listening
achievement that students will get.
41
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS
A. Conclusion
This research investigates the relationship between the listening frequency to
English songs and students’ listening achievement. This study used correlational
study to describe the data that obtained from the listening test and score from
questionnaire. The data that researched obtained was further calculated using the
Pearson Product Moment Correlation Coefficient, through SPSS.
Referring to the research question, it shows that there is positive correlation
between listening frequency to English song (X) and students’ listening skill (Y).
The statistical hypothesis also shows that Ha is accepted and Ho is rejected. The p-
value is 0.693 which means the correlation between X variables and Y variable is
moderate (0.40—0.70).
In conclusion, there is a tendency that when listening frequency to English
songs is higher, the students’ listening achievement can be higher. It can be said
too that the listening frequency to English songs help improve students’ listening
achievement.
B. Suggestions
Based on the conclusion of the research, the writer puts forward some
suggestions, they are:
a. For Teachers
1. The teachers of English should be able to motivate their students to listen lots
of English material to enrich them with variety of linguistic signals
(vocabularies, idioms, etc.), pronunciation, information, etc. and to make
them ready when confronting the spoken language; by native or non-native
speakers of English.
2. The teachers should have various methods of teaching listening to help the
students’ to be easier in improving their listening skill.
42
3. If teachers want to use English songs as teaching aids, the teachers should be
careful on song choice. This is because not every English songs can be used
as teaching aids in class.
b. For Students
1. It is better for students to make listening to English songs as a habit because it
can practice listening skill well all the time indirectly.
2. Students should have a desire to learn and practice listening. They may use
songs as media, but not only for fun and decrease stress, but they have to pay
attention to it.
3. Not only for teachers, but students also have to know that not all English
songs can be used to practice listening skill.
c. For Future researchers
The research should be done (if using the same method) with some
improvements, such as types of the questionnaire, number of sample, previous
study, etc. or through the experimental one. This is expected to see more clearly
and comprehensibly on the influence of the frequency of listening to English
songs on listening skill.
43
BIBLIOGRAPHY
"Active Listening”. Inspiration. White Dove Books. (Retrieved from
http://www.white dovebooks.com on 20 Desember 2014.
Alberto, Edgar. The Use of Song as a Tool to Work on Listening and Culture in
ESL Classes. Scientific Information System Network of Scientific Journals
from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal. No.15, 2010.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. Prosedur Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2013.
Beasly, Robert E.. Web-Based Music Study: The Effects of Listening Repetition,
Song Likeability and Song Understandability on EFL Learning
Perceptions and Outcomes. TESL-EJ (Retrieved from http://tesl-
ej.org/ej46/a3.html on 23 Desember 2015). Vol. 12. No. 2, 2008.
Barthes, Roland. The Responsibility of Forms. New York: New York Hill and
Wang, 1985.
Brown, Gillian & George Yul. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1983.
Brown, James Dean. Using Survey in Language Program. New York: Cambrige
University Press, 2001.
Claerr, Thomas Aa. & Richard Gargan. The Role of Songs in Foreign Language
Classroom, OMLTA Journal. Vol. I, 1984.
Darnton, Andrew. Habits, Routines and Sustainable Lifestyle. London:
Department of Enviroment and Food and Rural Affairs, 2011.
Devine, Thomas G. Listening Skills Schoolwide: Activites and Programs. ERIC
Clearing on Reading and Communication Skills. 1982.
Dorney, Zoltan & Tatsuya Taguchi, Questionnaire in Second Language Research.
Madison Avenue, New York: Routledge, 2010.
44
Falioni, J.W.. Music as Means to Enhance Cultural Awareness and Literacy in
Foreign Language Classroom. Mid-Atlantic Journal of Foreign Language
Pedagogy. Vol.1, 1993.
Fraenkel, Jack R. & Norman E. Wallen, How to Design and Evaluate Research in
Education, 7th Edition. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.,
2009.
Gronlund, Norman E.. Measurement and Evaluation in Teaching. New York:
Macmillian, 1976.
H., Culbertson. Classroom listening skills. (Retrieved from
http://home.snu.edu/~hCULBERT/listen.htm on 20 Desember 2015).
Harmer, Jeremy. The Practice of English Language Teaching. New York:
Longman, 2011.
Hedge, Tricia. Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 2000.
Kahraman, Volkan. The Use of Songs in Listening Comprehension in English. Dil
Dergisi. Vol.149, 2008.
King L., Martha & Gay Su Pinnell, Access to Meaning/ Spoken and Written
Language. Collage of Education Ohio State University. Vol. 23. No. 3,
1984.
Kul Cheung, Yun. The Importance of Teaching Listening in EFL Classroom.
Journal of Institute of Education Science. 2010.
Lynch, Larry M.. Using Popular Songs to Improve Language Listening
Comprehension Skill. (Retrieved from
http://esl4free.blogspot.com/2008/02/can-music-improve-your-students on
24 December 2015).
Lynch, Tony. Academic Listening: Marrying Top and Bottom. Current Trends in
the Development and Teaching of Four Language Skills. E. Uso-Juan and
A. Martinez- Flor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2006.
45
Mendelsohn, David J. Learning How to Listen Using Learning Strategies.
Current Trends in the Development and Teaching of Four Language
Skills. E. Uso-Juan and A. Martinez- Flor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter,
2006.
Miller, Lindsay. Developing Listening Skills with Authentic Materials. ESL
Magazine, 2003.
Muijs, Daniel. Doing Quantitaive Research in Education with SPSS. London:
Sage Publication Ltd., 2004.
Nadig, Larry Alan. Tips on Effective Listening. (Retrieved from
http://www.drnadig.com/listening.htm on 24 Desember 2015).
Nichols, R. G.. Factors in listening comprehension, Speech Monographs. London:
Routledge, 1948.
Nunan, David. Language Teaching Methodology. London: Prentince Hall
International, Ltd., 1991.
Oanh, Trần Thị. The Use of Songs to Improve Listening Skills for Students at ITC
Foreign Language Center in Hai Duong, Thesis, University of Language
and International Study, Hai Duong, 2011.
Renukadevi, D.. The Role in Language Acquisition ;the Challenges & Strategies
in Teaching Listening. International Journal of Education Information
Studies. Vol.4. 2014.
Salcedo, Claudia Smith. The Effect of Songs in Foreign Language Classroom on
Text Recall and Involuntary Mental Rehearsal. Journal of Collage
Teaching & Learning. Vol. 7. No. 6, 2010.
Saricoban, Arif. The Teaching Listening. The Internet TESL Journal, Vol. V. No.
12. (Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Saricoban-Listening.html on
24 December 2015), 1999.
Sevik, Mustava. Teaching Listening Skills to Young Learners through "Listen and
Do" Songs. English Teaching Forum, Vol. 50. No. 3, 2012.
46
Temple, C. & J.W. Gillet. Language arts: Learning processes and teaching
practices. Glenview. Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Company, 1989.
Thoha, M. Chaib. Teknik Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo
persada, 2003.
Ur, Penny. A Course in Language Teaching: Practice and Theory. London:
Cambrige University Press, 1996.
Ur, Penny. Teaching Listening Comprehension. London: Cambrige University
Press, 2009.
Vandergrift, L. & C.C M. Goh. Teaching and Learning Second Language
Listening. New York: Routledge, 2012.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/song
47
APPENDIX 1
DETAIL OF QUESTIONNAIRE SCORES
R Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Questionnaire
Score
1 3 3 2 2 4 14
2 4 4 3 3 4 18
3 3 2 2 2 2 11
4 2 1 1 1 3 8
5 4 5 3 3 4 19
6 4 4 3 3 3 17
7 4 4 4 4 3 19
8 5 5 5 3 3 21
9 3 2 1 2 2 10
10 4 5 5 3 3 20
11 2 3 1 1 4 11
12 4 4 2 2 4 16
13 3 2 2 2 2 11
14 5 5 5 2 1 18
15 4 4 3 3 3 17
16 3 4 2 2 4 15
17 3 3 2 2 4 14
18 4 4 5 4 2 19
19 3 3 3 3 3 15
20 3 3 5 5 3 19
21 4 5 3 4 3 19
22 4 5 3 4 4 20
23 4 4 2 2 4 16
24 4 4 3 3 3 17
25 4 4 2 2 4 16
26 4 4 5 4 2 19
27 3 3 1 2 4 13
28 3 3 3 3 3 15
29 3 3 2 2 4 14
30 4 5 3 4 4 20
31 3 2 2 2 2 11
32 2 3 1 2 4 12
33 4 5 5 4 3 21
34 4 4 5 4 2 19
48
R Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Questionnaire
Score
35 5 5 5 4 3 22
36 5 5 4 4 5 23
37 3 3 2 2 4 14
38 3 2 2 2 2 9
39 4 4 3 3 3 17
40 4 4 3 3 4 18
41 5 5 5 4 3 22
42 4 4 2 2 4 16
43 3 2 2 2 2 11
44 4 4 3 3 4 18
45 3 3 2 2 4 14
46 4 4 3 4 4 19
47 4 4 3 3 3 17
48 3 1 2 2 2 12
49 4 4 3 3 4 18
50 3 3 3 3 3 15
51 3 3 3 3 3 15
52 3 2 2 2 2 11
53 4 4 3 3 4 18
54 4 4 2 2 4 16
55 4 4 5 4 2 19
56 4 5 3 4 4 20
57 5 5 5 4 3 22
58 4 5 5 4 3 21
59 4 4 3 3 3 17
60 4 4 5 4 2 19
61 2 2 1 1 1 7
62 4 4 3 3 3 17
49
50
51
52
53
54
55