the representation of coupling interactions in the material...

7
Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=yaac20 Advances in Applied Ceramics Structural, Functional and Bioceramics ISSN: 1743-6753 (Print) 1743-6761 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/yaac20 The representation of coupling interactions in the Material Properties Open Database (MPOD) Luis E. Fuentes-Cobas, Daniel Chateigner, María E. Fuentes-Montero, Giancarlo Pepponi & Saulius Grazulis To cite this article: Luis E. Fuentes-Cobas, Daniel Chateigner, María E. Fuentes-Montero, Giancarlo Pepponi & Saulius Grazulis (2017) The representation of coupling interactions in the Material Properties Open Database (MPOD), Advances in Applied Ceramics, 116:8, 428-433, DOI: 10.1080/17436753.2017.1343782 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/17436753.2017.1343782 © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 18 Aug 2017. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 86 View Crossmark data

Upload: others

Post on 03-Sep-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The representation of coupling interactions in the Material ...blogs.cimav.edu.mx/luis.fuentes/data/files/Computacion...The representation of coupling interactions in the Material

Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found athttps://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=yaac20

Advances in Applied CeramicsStructural, Functional and Bioceramics

ISSN: 1743-6753 (Print) 1743-6761 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/yaac20

The representation of coupling interactions in theMaterial Properties Open Database (MPOD)

Luis E. Fuentes-Cobas, Daniel Chateigner, María E. Fuentes-Montero,Giancarlo Pepponi & Saulius Grazulis

To cite this article: Luis E. Fuentes-Cobas, Daniel Chateigner, María E. Fuentes-Montero,Giancarlo Pepponi & Saulius Grazulis (2017) The representation of coupling interactions in theMaterial Properties Open Database (MPOD), Advances in Applied Ceramics, 116:8, 428-433, DOI:10.1080/17436753.2017.1343782

To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/17436753.2017.1343782

© 2017 The Author(s). Published by InformaUK Limited, trading as Taylor & FrancisGroup

Published online: 18 Aug 2017.

Submit your article to this journal

Article views: 86

View Crossmark data

Page 2: The representation of coupling interactions in the Material ...blogs.cimav.edu.mx/luis.fuentes/data/files/Computacion...The representation of coupling interactions in the Material

The representation of coupling interactions in the Material Properties OpenDatabase (MPOD)Luis E. Fuentes-Cobas a, Daniel Chateigner b, María E. Fuentes-Montero c, Giancarlo Pepponid* andSaulius Grazulise

aCentro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados (CIMAV), Chihuahua, México; bCRISMAT-ENSICAEN, CNRS UMR 6508, NormandieUniversité, IUT Caen, Université de Caen Normandie, Caen, France; cFacultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua,Circuito Universitario, Chihuahua, México; dMiNALab, CMM-irst, Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Trento, Italy; eDepartment of MathematicalComputer Science, Faculty of Mathematics and Informatics, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania

ABSTRACTThe Material Properties Open Database (MPOD, http://mpod.cimav.edu.mx) is a functionalelement of the web-based open databases system linked with crystallography. MPOD deliverssingle-crystal tensor properties in several representations, ranging from numerical matrices to3D printing. Longitudinal moduli surfaces can be displayed in computers as well as in smartcell phones. Properties are stored as ‘.mpod’ files. IUCr formatting standards (CIF) arefollowed. The original published paper containing the data is cited. Structural andexperimental information is also registered and linked. ‘Coupling properties’, say piezo-effectsand magnetoelectricity, represent interactions linking different subsystems in a material.Currently, piezoelectricity occupies a significant fraction of cases in MPOD. The implicationsof crystal symmetry in piezoelectricity are systematically taken into account. Matrices’elements and longitudinal moduli surfaces are checked for consistency with the Neumannprinciple. The inclusion of magnetoelectric axial tensors introduces exciting features into MPOD.

ARTICLE HISTORYReceived 2 May 2017Accepted 14 June 2017

KEYWORDSCrystal properties; opendatabase; anisotropy;Neumann principle

Introduction

The physical properties of crystalline materials arenecessary in many fields, from education to engineering.The properties most commonly considered in traditionalstudies (Young’s modulus, dielectric constant…) corre-spond to experiments in which both the stimulus andthe sample’s response are associated with a given subsys-tem in the material (elasticity, electricity…). We denotethese interactions and properties as ‘principal’. Today’stechnology is decidedly dependent on ‘coupling proper-ties’ (piezoelectricity, magnetostriction, magnetoelectri-city…) in which a stimulus in one subsystemgenerates a response in another one. The most complete,though not intuitive, manner of presenting physicalproperties is by means of the tensor representation.The classical reference in this field is the Landolt–Börn-stein collection [1]. The Materials Project [2,3], UC-Ber-keley, represents a highly interesting effort in thedirection of calculating theoretically and disclosing thephysical properties of materials. Kaminsky’s pro-grammes and data concerning crystalline morphologyand properties are also of interest [4]. In this universe,the contribution of the Material Properties Open Data-base (MPOD) is to openly offer a collection of properties

values based on published experimental data. MPODwas initiated by Chateigner in 2010 and developed in col-laboration with Pepponi and Grazulis [5]. In the recentyears, with contributions from the CrystallographyGroup at CIMAV (Centro de Investigación en Materi-ales Avanzados), MPOD is being expanded. Some direc-tions in which MPOD has grown comprise the inclusionof new electromagnetic properties and the delivery ofgraphic representations of properties [6]. This articledescribes the current MPOD tasks. Some focus is puton coupling properties, their representation by differentmeans and the interesting effect of crystal symmetry onmaterials properties. The organisation of the paper is asfollows. First, a brief description of the treatment givento crystal properties in MPOD is given. Second, a repre-sentative scan of MPOD cases is presented. Finally, asampling of the tensor and group theoretical toolsbehind MPOD is divulged.

Data treatment in MPOD

The open database MPOD describes the physical prop-erties of single crystals. The information provided isbased on experimentally measured tensor magnitudes.

© 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis GroupThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, orbuilt upon in any way.

CONTACT Luis E. Fuentes-Cobas [email protected] Centro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados (CIMAV), Miguel de Cervantes 120,Complejo Industrial Chihuahua, Chihuahua 31136 Chihuahua, México*Present address: Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Micro Nano Facility, via Sommarive 18, 38123 Trento, Italy

ADVANCES IN APPLIED CERAMICS, 2017VOL. 116, NO. 8, 428–433https://doi.org/10.1080/17436753.2017.1343782

Page 3: The representation of coupling interactions in the Material ...blogs.cimav.edu.mx/luis.fuentes/data/files/Computacion...The representation of coupling interactions in the Material

In all cases, reference to the original source is included.Following standard treatments [7,8,9] physical proper-ties are defined, in linear approximation, by means ofconstitutive equations (1).

Y = K · X (1)

TensorX (rankm) represents the action (cause) on thesample,Y (rank n) is the materials response (effect) andK(m+n) is the linking property. Principal and couplingproperties scan several tensor ranks. To decrease thedimensionality of writing tensors of rank equal to orgreater than 2, the so-called matrix or compact notationis frequently used. 3 × 3 symmetric matrices (say the stresstensor) are represented as 6 × 1 hypervectors. Piezoelectricand elastic tensors are written, respectively, as 3 × 6 and6 × 6 matrices. The constitutive equation for the piezo-electric charge coefficients tensor d is written as follows.

P = d · T (2)

P1P2P3

⎡⎣

⎤⎦ =

d11 d12 d13d21 d22 d23d31 d32 d33

d14 d15 d16d24 d25 d26d34 d35 d36

⎡⎣

⎤⎦

·

T1

T2

T3

T4

T5

T6

⎡⎢⎢⎢⎢⎢⎢⎣

⎤⎥⎥⎥⎥⎥⎥⎦

(3)

P is the electric polarisation andT is themechanical stress.The characterisation of material’s symmetry is essen-

tial for properties investigation. MPOD is consistentwith theoretically derived ‘selection rules’ for the struc-ture of principal and coupling properties tensors[10,11]. In MPOD, the introduction of new data is per-formed through a programme that builds the propertiesmatrices, depending on the rank of the considered ten-sor and according to symmetry. Besides the atomic dis-tribution symmetry, magnetic symmetry may also betaken into account. The polar or axial nature of theproperty, as well as magnitudes’ behaviour under timeinversion, is part of the symmetry analysis. This issueis discussed in Fuentes-Cobas et al. [12,13].

The MPOD data files are written in the InternationalUnion of Crystallography ‘CIF’ format. The contents ofthese files include a link to the original source, the appli-cable symmetry point group, the measurement tech-nique and conditions and the properties matrices. Theuser can search files by chemical composition, byphase name or by property. The default output consistsof the properties matrices. Commands are available forplotting the properties in the so-called longitudinal sur-face representation. The output screen contains the com-mands for generating ‘STL’ files for 3D prints.

We illustrate the conversion from tensor to surfacerepresentation through the example of piezoelectricity.The longitudinal piezoelectric surface d(h) represents

the following. Consider a tensile stress in an arbitrarydirection, which we denote Ox

′1. In tensor notation,

we name this stress T′11. (In compact notation it

would be T′1). In a general case, the piezoelectric polar-

isation that will appear on the crystal will not be paral-lel to Ox

′1. It will show several Cartesian components.

We focus on P′1, the projection of the polarisation

along Ox′1. We write

P′1 = d

′111 T

′11 (4)

d′111 describes the longitudinal piezoelectric effect. Thesurface of d

′111 is constructed by varying Ox

′1 through

all directions in space and plotting for each orientationa point at a distance from the origin proportional tod

′111. The calculation of d

′111 starting from the knowl-

edge of the tensor dijk is done by means of Equation (5)

d(f, b) = d′111 =

∑i,j,k

a1ia1ja1kdijk (5)

The coefficients a1i and analogous are the directioncosines of the direction Ox

′1 relative to Cartesian

axes Oxi (i, j, k = 1, 2, 3).MPOD contains the equations for plotting the longi-

tudinal surfaces associated with tensor ranks from 2 to 4,polar and axial. Matrices are read in compact notation(two indices) and orientations in space h = (φ, β) arecharacterised by polar (φ) and azimuthal (β) angles.

The representation of the tensor properties as longi-tudinal surfaces is useful for the visualisation and thespatial analysis of the properties. An important advantageof this type of representation is that it facilitates the com-parative analysis between the structural and the property’ssymmetries. As a general regularity the following Neu-mann principle is valid: ‘The symmetry of the effect isat least equal to the symmetry of the cause’. In crystal phy-sics the Neumann principle may be stated as follows: Thesymmetry group of any macroscopic property must containthe crystal structure point group as a subgroup.

MPOD case studies

Principal interactions in BaTiO3

BaTiO3 is registered in the Database as file‘1000304.mpod’. The link to the original source leadsto the classical report by Berlincourt and Jaffe [14].The structure point group is 4 mm.

Dielectric constant εrEquation (6) gives the εr tensor and Figure 1 representsthe εr(h) surface

1r =2920 0 00 2920 00 0 168

⎡⎣

⎤⎦ (6)

ADVANCES IN APPLIED CERAMICS 429

Page 4: The representation of coupling interactions in the Material ...blogs.cimav.edu.mx/luis.fuentes/data/files/Computacion...The representation of coupling interactions in the Material

ElasticityEquation (7) represents the BaTiO3 elastic compliancetensor (at constant electric field) sE. Figure 2(a)shows the longitudinal compliance surface sE(h).Figure 2(b) represents the Young modulus surface E(h) = 1/sE(h).

sE=

8.05 −2.35 −5.24−2.35 8.05 −5.24−5.24 −5.24 15.7

0 0 00 0 00 0 0

0 0 00 0 00 0 0

18.4 0 00 18.4 00 0 8.84

⎡⎢⎢⎢⎢⎢⎢⎣

⎤⎥⎥⎥⎥⎥⎥⎦10−12Pa−1

(7)

Piezoelectricity in BaTiO3 and quartz

BaTiO3

Equation (8) represents the d tensor for BaTiO3.Figure 3 shows the longitudinal piezoelectric surface

d(h).

d =0 0 00 0 0

−34.5 −34.5 85.6

0 392 0392 0 00 0 0

⎡⎣

⎤⎦ pC

·N−1

(8)

Quartz (1000055.mpod)Piezoelectric tensor e for quartz, Equation (9), is takenfrom Ogi et al. [15]. Tensor e is a useful alternative to din textured polycrystals’ effective properties calcu-lations [16]. Structure point group is 32. Figure 4shows the piezoelectric longitudinal surface.

e=0.151 −0.151 00 0 00 0 0

−0.061 0 00 0.061 −0.3020 0 0

⎡⎣

⎤⎦ C

·m−2

(9)

Magnetoelectricity

The constitutive equation for magnetoelectricity is P =α·H. Magnetic field intensity H is an axial vector, P ispolar and the magnetoelectric tensor α is axial, secondrank.

LiCoPO4 (1000360.mpod)The atomic distribution space group for LiCoPO4, at4.2 K, is Pnma (point group mmm). The magneticsymmetry point group, taking into account the atomicmagnetic dipoles orientations is mmm’ [17]. Equation(10), from Rivera and Schmid [18], represents the mag-netoelectric tensor. The magnetoelectric longitudinal

Figure 1. BaTiO3 longitudinal dielectric constant surface.Dielectric constant is a polar second rank tensor. The εr(h) sur-face wraps the coordinates’ origin. The equatorial plane (z = 0)is a symmetry mirror for the dielectric constant. The propertypoint group is 1/mmm. 4 mm.

Figure 2. BaTiO3 (a) elastic compliance and (b) Young modulus. Elasticity is described by polar fourth rank tensors. The sE(h) andE(h) surfaces wrap the origin. The equatorial plane is a mirror. The property point group is 4/mmm. 4 mm.

430 L. E. FUENTES-COBAS ET AL.

Page 5: The representation of coupling interactions in the Material ...blogs.cimav.edu.mx/luis.fuentes/data/files/Computacion...The representation of coupling interactions in the Material

surface α(h) is shown as Figure 5.

a =0 18.4 0

30.6 0 00 0 0

⎡⎣

⎤⎦ ps ·m−1 (10)

3D printing of properties surfaces

The MPOD graphic interface includes the command togenerate 3D print files, in STL format. Figure 6 showsphotos of representative 3D impressions.

The maths behind MPOD

The diversity of geometries observed in the presentedfigures corresponds to the equally diverse collectionof matrices representing physical properties. The phys-ical law underlying this diversity is the aforementionedNeumann principle. The starting point for a property’ssymmetry analysis is to identify the mathematicalnature of the ‘cause’ (X) and ‘effect’ (Y) magnitudesinvolved in the definitions of the considered ‘property’K (Equation (1)). Any element of a matrix representinga property, say piezoelectric d24 = 392 pC N−1 inEquations (3) and (8), expresses the effect of an

elementary component of the stress [T4 (matrix) =T23 (tensor) = Tyz] on one of the elementary com-ponents of the polarisation [P2 = Py].

Let us analyse the relation X→ Y from the point ofview of Neumann’s principle, using group theory tools.

An irreducible representation (irrep) of a pointgroup contains its characters and bases. The basesrepresent coordinates or components of polar vectors(x, y, z), components of axial vectors (Rx, Ry, Rz), tensorcomponents, hypervectors (t1,… t6) or coordinate pro-ducts. These bases, under the symmetry operations ofthe group, are transformed according to the charactersof the irreps table. An irrep characterises the way eachoperation of a point group acts on the elementary com-ponents of vectors and tensors.

Table 1 shows the irreps of the mm2 point group.This group represents the symmetry of the water mol-ecule and also of some of the so-called ‘Aurivillius

Figure 4. Longitudinal piezoelectric surface e(h) for α-quartz.The three characteristic ‘almonds’ graze the origin. The equa-torial plane is a mirror. Property point group: −6 m2. 32.

Figure 5. Longitudinal magnetoelectric coefficient α(h).LiCoPO4 single crystal at 4.2 K. The mmm’ magnetic symmetryassociated with the axial nature of magnetoelectric coefficientsleads to interesting observations: vertical mirror planes (xz) and(yz) convert positive to negative. Horizontal antimirror (xy)plane preserves sign.

Figure 3. Piezoelectric charge constant d(h) surface for BaTiO3.Piezoelectricity is represented by polar third rank tensors. The d(h) surface grazes but cannot wrap the origin. The z = 0 plane isnot a mirror. Property point group is 1 mm. 4 mm.

Figure 6. MPOD 3D printing of longitudinal properties. (a)Quartz piezoelectricity; (b) LiCoPO4 magnetoelectricity. Positiveand negative values are observable.

Table 1. Irreducible representations for mm2 point group.

C2v E C2(z) σxz σyz

Representation bases

Polar and axial vectorcomponents

Hypervectorcomponents

A1 1 1 1 1 z t1; t2; t3A2 1 1 −1 −1 Rz t6B1 1 −1 1 −1 x, Ry t5B2 1 −1 −1 1 y, Rx t4

ADVANCES IN APPLIED CERAMICS 431

Page 6: The representation of coupling interactions in the Material ...blogs.cimav.edu.mx/luis.fuentes/data/files/Computacion...The representation of coupling interactions in the Material

ceramics’ (an important family of ferro-piezoelectrics).For example, in the mm2 group, the ‘x’ basis is trans-formed following the B1 irrep.

According to the Neumann principle, all propertiesmust satisfy, at least, the symmetry of the structuralpoint group. A property describes the action-responserelationship. If a property is symmetrical about a cer-tain rotation, the components of the response to agiven action must be transformed in the same way asthe components of the action are transformed. For-mally, the components of the vectors and/or tensorsof action and response must share the same irrep.

We illustrate the related methodology by analysing acase of interest.

Pyro- and Piezoelectricity in Aurivillius phases

Let us analyse pyro- and piezoelectricity in materialswith mm2 symmetry.

We start considering the so-called fully symmetricirrep A1. In this irrep, the characters of all the sym-metry operations are +1. The z component of any vec-tor remains invariant under all the transformations ofthis group. Scalars, like temperature, are also invariantunder all the operations. The coincidence of z and sca-lars in A1 implies thatmm2 objects (say, the water mol-ecule) exhibit a spontaneous electric dipole moment,this moment points along the z axis and may dependon the scalar temperature.

Consider now the elements linked with A1 in thehypervector components column. The stress com-ponents T1, T2 and T3 are represented there. Thecoincidence of these tensor components in the sameirrep as P3 (z) implies that there can exist a linearcause–effect relationship. In other words, the coeffi-cients d31, d32 y d33 may be different from zero.

Following a similar reasoning it is found that d15and d24 may also be non-zero. In this way, it is deduced

that the piezoelectric matrix for the mm2 point grouphas the form given in Equation (11).

d =0 0 00 0 0d31 d32 d33

0 d15 0d24 0 00 0 0

⎡⎣

⎤⎦ (11)

The particular case of the Aurivillius compoundBi2WO6 has been measured by Takeda et al. [19]. Hisresults are reproduced in Equation (12).

d =0 0 00 0 0

−17 −4.4 27

0 46 024 0 00 0 0

⎡⎣

⎤⎦pC ·N−1 (12)

Figure 7 shows the piezoelectric surface of Bi2WO6.

Conclusions

Crystal thermo–electro–magneto–elastic couplingsexhibit a wide spectrum of anisotropic responses,linked with structural and magnetic symmetry, polarand axial nature of magnitudes and tensor ranks.

MPOD (http://mpod.cimav.edu.mx) is an opendatabase that delivers measured materials propertiesin matrix, surface and 3D printing descriptions.

Properties’ data in MPOD are computer processed,based on tensor analysis and group theory criteria.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Funding

Support from Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología –CONACYT, Project 257912 “Representación y pronósticode las propiedades físicas de los materiales mono- y policris-talinos”, is recognised. This project has received fundingfrom the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research andinnovation program under grant agreement No. 689868,SOLSA project.

ORCID

Luis E. Fuentes-Cobas http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6063-3967Daniel Chateigner http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7792-8702María E. Fuentes-Montero http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3388-8224

References

[1] Landolt H, Börnstein R, Fischer H, et al. Landolt-Bornstein: numerical data and functional relationshipsin science and technology. New York: Springer; 1987.

[2] De Jong M, Chen W, Angsten T, et al. Charting thecomplete elastic properties of inorganic crystallinecompounds. Scientific Data. 2015;2:9–21.

[3] De Jong M, Chen W, Geerlings H, et al. A database toenable discovery and design of piezoelectric materials.Scientific Data. 2015;2:53–65.

Figure 7. Longitudinal piezoelectric coefficient d(h). Bi2WO6

single crystal at room temperature. Structure and propertypoint group: mm2.

432 L. E. FUENTES-COBAS ET AL.

Page 7: The representation of coupling interactions in the Material ...blogs.cimav.edu.mx/luis.fuentes/data/files/Computacion...The representation of coupling interactions in the Material

[4] Kaminsky W. WinXMorph: a computer program todraw crystal morphology, growth sectors and crosssections with export files in VRML V2. 0 utf8-virtualreality format. J Appl Crystallogr. 2005;38:566–567.

[5] Pepponi G, Gražulis S, Chateigner D. MPOD: a materialproperty open database linked to structural information.Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2012;284:10–14.

[6] Fuentes-Cobas L, Chateigner D, Pepponi G, et al.Poster presentation. Acta Cryst. 2014;70:C1039.

[7] Newnham RE. Properties of materials: anisotropy,symmetry, structure. New York: Oxford UniversityPress on Demand; 2005.

[8] Fuentes L. Magnetic-coupling properties in polycrys-tals. Textures Microstruct. 1998;30:167–189.

[9] Bunge H-J. Texture analysis in materials science: math-ematical methods. New York: Elsevier; 2013.

[10] Nye J. The physical properties of crystals. Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press; 1985.

[11] Nowick AS. Crystal properties via group theory. NewYork: Cambridge University Press; 1995.

[12] Fuentes-Cobas L, Matutes-Aquino J, Fuentes-MonteroM. Magnetoelectricity. In: Buschow KHJ, editor.Handbook of magnetic materials. 19. Anmsterdam:Elsevier; 2011. p. 129–229.

[13] Fuentes-Cobas L, Matutes-Aquino J, Botello-ZubiateM, et al. Advances in magnetoelectric materials andtheir application. Handb Magn Mater. 2015;24:237–322.

[14] Berlincourt D, Jaffe H. Elastic and piezoelectric coeffi-cients of single-crystal barium titanate. Phys Rev.1958;111:143–148.

[15] Ogi H, Ohmori T, Nakamura N, et al. Elastic, anelastic,and piezoelectric coefficients of α-quartz determinedby resonance ultrasound spectroscopy. J Appl Phys.2006;100:053511.

[16] Fuentes-Cobas LE, Muñoz-Romero A, Montero-Cabrera ME, et al. Predicting the coupling propertiesof axially-textured materials. Materials. 2013;6:4967–4984.

[17] Brown PJ, Forsyth JB, Tasset F. Studies of magneto-electric crystals using spherical neutron polarimetry.Solid State Sci. 2005;7:682–689.

[18] Rivera J-P, Schmid H. Search for the piezomagneto-electric effect in LiCoPO4. Ferroelectrics. 1994;161:91–97.

[19] Takeda H, Han JS, Nishida M, et al. Growth andpiezoelectric properties of ferroelectric mono-domaincrystals. Solid State Commun. 2010;150:836–839.

ADVANCES IN APPLIED CERAMICS 433