ARIZONA SUPERIOR COURT, County of Maricopa

In re the Marriage of

SANDRA LYNN BUNKER

Plaintiffs,

VS. CIVIL ACTION NO: DR-186159

ERIC A. BUNKER NOTICE OF SERVICE OF NONUNIFORM INTERROGATORIES TO:

The Respondent, ERIC A. BUNKER Defendants.

Pursuant to RCP 33 and the Uniform Rules of Practice of the Superior Court Rule XVII, this party

propounds to you and your attorney Nonuniform Interrogatories Numbered -1- through -1-

The propounding party has filed the original of this Notice of Service of Nonuniform Interrogatories with the Clerk of this Court and has served a copy thereof upon each other party or his attorney, as evidenced below.

COPIES MAILED pursuant to RCP 5 this date to these persons, in these capacities and at these addresses:

Brian W. Hendrickson, Esquire Attorney at Law 2530 South Rural Road Tempe, Arizona 85282

W. Dea Montague Attorney Finn Name and Address

2800 South Rural Tempe, Arizona 8528!te

ARIZONA SUPERIOR COURT, County of Mar icopa

In re the Marriage of

SANDRA LYNN BUNKER

and CIVIL ACTION NO: DR-186159

ERIC A. BUNKER

NONUNIFORM UNIFORM

INTERROGATORIES TO:

The Respondent, ERIC A. BUNKER

The party whose attorney subscribes propounds the attached Interrogatories. RCP 33. If the party served is a public or private corporation, a partnership or association, or governmental

agency, these Interrogatories shall be answered by any officer or agent, who shall furnish such infor-mation as is available to the party.

Each interrogatory shall be answered separately and fully in writing under oath unless it is ob-jected to, in which event the reasons for objection shall be stated in lieu of an answer. The answers are to be signed by the person making them, and the objections signed by the attorney making them. The party upon whom the interrogatories have been served shall serve a copy of the answers and objections, if any, within 30 days after the service of the Interrogatories, except that a Defendant may serve answers or objections within 45 days after service of the Summons and Complaint upon that Defendant.

Where the answer to an interrogatory may be derived or ascertained from the business records of the party upon whom the interrogatory has been served or from an examination, audit or inspection of such business records, or from a compilation, abstract or summary based thereon, and the burden of deriving or ascertaining the answer is substantially the same for the party serving the interrogatory as for the party served, it is a sufficient answer to such interrogatory to specify the records from which the answer may be derived or ascertained and to afford the party serving the interrogatory reasonable opportunity to examine, audit or inspect such records and to make copies, compilations, abstracts or summaries.

The answers to these interrogatories shall include the knowledge of the parties to whom these in-terrogatories are directed, their attorneys, and all agents, servants, representatives, investigators and others who may have obtained information on behalf of the parties or their attorneys. If the parties served with Interrogatories fail to properly serve answers, then the propounding party may apply for those sanctions set forth in RCP 37(a), including reasonable attorneys' fees.

Each party to whom these Interrogatories are directed is required seasonably to supplement his response with respect to any question directly addressed to the identity and location of persons having knowledge of discoverable matters and the identity of each person expected to be called as an expert witness at the trial, the subject matter on which he is expected to testify and the substance of his testi-mony. Each party to whom these Interrogatories are directed is required seasonably to amend a prior response if he obtains information on the basis of which he knows that the response was incorrect when made or he knows that the response, though correct when made, is no longer true and the circumstances are such that a failure to amend a response is in substance knowing concealment.

Where an individual interrogators' calls for an answer which involves more than one part, each

W. Dea Montague

Attorney Firm Name and Address PATTEN, MONTAGUE & ARNETT 2800 South Rural Road Tempe, Arizona 85282

VA

part of the answer should be clearly set out so that it is understandable. Where the terms "you", "plaintiff", "defendant" or other designation for a party are used, they

are meant to include every individual party and separate answers should be given for each party named as a party, if requested.

SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES

PURSUANT TO RCP5 and Uniform Rule 17(c) the original and one copy of Nonuniform Inter-rogatories have been mailed this date to the answering party or to that party's attorney and to other persons, in the capacities and at the addresses indicated, listed below.

D PURSUANT TO RCP5 and Uniform Rule 17(d) the original Notice of Service of Uniform In-terrogatories has been filed with the Clerk of the Court, and a copy has been mailed to the answering party or to that party's attorney and to other persons, in the capacities and at the addresses indicated, listed below.

Brian W. Hendrickson, Esquire Attorney at Law 2530 South Rural Road Tempe, Arizona 85282

W. Dea Montague Attorney Firm Name and Address PATTEN, MONTAGUE & ARNETT 2800 South Rural Road Tempe, Arizona 85282Dated:L

Attorney for Petit iori

TM

1 1. Which of the witnesses on your initial list of

2 witnesses do you intend to call as witnesses, along with their

3 addresses, telephone numbers, occupations, and a brief statement

4 regarding what each knows of the relevant issues and what the

5 substance of their testumony will be.

6

7

8

9

10

1]

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

- 20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

MI -1-