the role of causation in history: chaos, free will and determinism
DESCRIPTION
The Role of Causation in History: Chaos, Free Will and Determinism. L/O – To identify the problems historians face when dealing with causation. Why is Causation important?. Every historical investigation begins with the simple question – ‘ why ?’ - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
The Role of Causation in History: Chaos, Free Will and Determinism
L/O – To identify the problems historians face when dealing with causation
Why is Causation important?•Every historical investigation
begins with the simple question – ‘why?’
• Identifying the most important causes of events allows us to decide how best to deal with it. This gives meaning to situations which otherwise would leave us feeling helpless.
Why is Causation important?• However… History is the flawed
product of incomplete evidence which is interpreted by Historians with their own values and preoccupations.
• So… historians answer the question ‘Why?’ in different ways, based on the evidence they choose to work with, and the conclusions they choose to draw.
TASK 1 – Read through the quotes
on causation on your worksheet.
Which one do you like the most and
why?
The Death of Billy Elliot•Billy Elliot (35) finished his last can of super-
strength beer and reflected on his predicament. He had been unemployed since the last factory in his area closed down a few years earlier. Like his father before him, he had taken to drink. Just recently, his wife had left him after finding out about the fling he’d had with Tasha Slappa down the road at a friend’s party. He told his wife that the summer heat had made him drink too much, but she told him to shove it.
The Death of Billy Elliot
•He decided to get another 6-pack of beer from the local off-licence. The government had recently cut back on unemployment benefits, but the bloke behind the counter, Akaash, had promised him a discount for being such a good customer lately. So, he grabbed his coat and put his shoes on.
The Death of Billy Elliot
•Just as he was leaving, his mother rang up to give him some family news. He had a quick chat with her, then left the house. As he strolled down the road, a boy came round the corner on a bicycle in a panic. Billy, who was still reflecting on what his mother had told him, was taken by surprise and leapt into the road.
The Death of Billy Elliot
•Sadly for Billy, a steam roller was passing at just the moment, resurfacing the road after it had buckled in the hot summer weather. The driver was still tired because his baby had been crying all night and didn’t see him. As a result, Billy was squelched into the shape of a pancake.
The Death of Billy Elliot• Having read the story, answer the
following questions:1. What three factors would you
pick out as being the most important causes of the tragedy?
2. What one further question could you ask to deepen your understanding about the tragedy?
3. Here are the three verdicts on the death of Billy Elliot. Take a class vote on which verdict you each find most convincing:
A B
Death by Free Will
Billy’s death was a freak
accident that has no
meaningful cause
Death by Marxist Dialectic
Billy was a sad victim of
economic forces
Death by Determinism
Billy was the victim of an
inevitable chain of circumstance traceable right back to climate and geography
The Historiographical View of Causation
Key Factor of change Timescale Big Question Concept of
Progress Details
Whig Historians(18th and
19th C)
Great Men & Actions of Individuals
Short-Term Where have we come from?
Peaceful, Evolutionary
progress
Thomas Macaulay had two key ideas:1. The driving force of
history was individuals acting with free will
2. History was a story of progress leading up to high point of the present age: the past was judged on present day values
Leopold von Ranke led a reaction against this by trying to show things how they actually were and assessing periods on their own terms using evidence =
historicism. Do you agree with Ranke or Macaulay more?
The Historiographical View of Causation
Key Factor of change Timescale Big Question Concept of
Progress Details
Marxist Historians(19th and 20th C)
EconomicsSocial ClassDialectics
Mid-Term Where are we going?
Violent, revolutionary
progress
Karl Marx said that economic forces
dictated the overall strategy of history;
individuals just provided the tactics
Like Macauley, he saw history as having its
own momentum, but felt that class conflict
not individuals provided it.
Does the collapse of so many communist regimes in the 20th century mean that the Marxist interpretation of history is worthless?
The Historiographical View of Causation
Key Factor of change Timescale Big Question Concept of
Progress Details
Annales Historians
(20th C)GeographySociology Long-Term Are we going
anywhere?Question
whole notion of progress
Fernand Braudel – argues that individuals and even societies are
merely short-term ripples on mid-term
waves subject to long-term tides.
It is these tides of history which provide
the driving force in history: climate change, discovery, floods etc…
Does this view of history essentially mean that it is pointless to study individual figures when trying to explain the causes of events?
The Approach of Philosophers to Causation• The three positions discussed are sandwiched
between two extremes of philosophical thought that reject the idea that human beings can influence the world around them in any meaningful way, whether
they learn from the past or not.
1. Chaos Theory – The idea that everything is down to chance events which we have no control over.
2. Determinism – The idea that everything is the inescapable result of what went before.
Conclusion• The only essential difference between
chaos and determinism is one of focus.
• A chaos theorist find an endless number of trivial accidental causes, whilst the determinist finds an infinite number of profound causes.
• Both make the same essential point: tracing any historical event backwards in a chain of cause and effect quickly leads to absurdity.
Conclusion• Not only is this chain endless, but there is an
endless number of chains.
• To add to the confusion, each event many have several causes, which in turn many have been caused by several events, each of which in turn may have several causes.
• Quickly, any attempt to sketch out the cause of an event will resemble not a chain, or even a series of chains, but a gigantic tree with an endless number of branches.
So how do we tackle Causation in essays?
1. Avoid the two extremes of determinism and chaos theory.
2. Instead, you should draw elements from both of these extreme. Historians will tend to occupy the middle ground between these two positions, both chronologically and thematically.
a) Chronologically – be broad ranging
• Like the determinists, historians will look at long term factors like the Annales School of historians who consider the impact of trends in geography and climate.
• Like the chaos theorists, they will look too at short term factors like Whig Historians who stress the role played by the ‘Great-Man’ coming along at the right time.
b) Thematically – be broad ranging
• By looking at a broad chronological range of factors, historians will also try to be broad ranging thematically.
• Many look at Economics (Marxists), Politics (Structuralists), Geography (Annales), Ideas (Hegelian), and the role of Key Individuals (Whig).
Result of this approach• By adopting the middle ground, we have to reside
ourselves to the fact that there are no final answers, only a cycle of questions and answers, leading to progressively wider understandings of history.
• However, by accepting that each event has a massive variety of causes, we run the danger of not making any conclusion at all!
• How do we get round this? We need to consider how we identify, group, link and prioritise causes.
Practical Approach to Causation – Categorising Causes
Content Causes• Social• Political• Economic• Religious• Military
Time Causes• Long-Term• Medium-Term• Short-Term
Role Causes• Trigger• Catalyst• Transformative• Pre-Condition
Importance Causes (Absolutely or Relatively)
• Necessary – If no X, then no Y• Sufficient – X was enough for Y
What is the best way to categorise
causes OR is a combination of methods best?
Practical Approach to Causation – Categorising Causes – Example 1
Causes of the First World War 1914-1918
PoliticalAlliance System, Imperialism as an political ideology: Empire was the only way to be a Great Power, Nationalism: created
the desire for power and security
Military HMS Dreadnought, Naval Arms Race between Britain and Germany, Growing size of conscript armies in Europe
EconomicGermany needed to secure new markets, Britain wanted to
protect existing markets, Russia wanted access to Mediterranean
SocialNationalism – created culture of superiority within and
between nations, led to belief that war was a valid policy option for states, led to assassination of Franz Ferdinand?
Practical Approach to Causation – Categorising Causes – Example 2
Causes of the First World War 1914-1918
Content Time Role Importance
1Political – Imperialism led to
competition between states & subjugation of smaller nations
which increased nationalist violence i.e. Serbia
Long-term Pre-condition
Sufficient for war to happen, made it more
likely
2Military – Naval Arms Race, raised fears about German
intentions, led to Alliance SystemShort-term Catalyst Relatively Necessary
for war to happen
3Social/Pol – Nationalism and
independence movements, new nations i.e. Serbia
Medium-term Trigger
Absolutely Necessary for war to happen,
triggered assassination
Practical
Approach to Causation –
Linking
Factors
Homework
•Using your guide to historiography, research one school of historical thought
of your choice.
•Write a 150 word summary, identifying what historians of that school believe
about why things change in history, what famous historians there are and any
famous works