the role of epigenetics in the developmental origins...
TRANSCRIPT
The role of epigenetics
in the developmental origins of human metabolic disease
Dr Karen A LillycropInstitute of Developmental Sciences
School of Biological SciencesUniversity of Southampton
Genotype
Early life environment
Phenotype+
Adult life style factorsEg
. Energy rich dietphysical inactivity
Chronic disease susceptibility(CVD, obesity, type II diabetes, cancer)
3
Infant mortality rates per 1000 live births during 1901-10
high medium lowBarker DJP (1998) Mothers, babies and health in later life
Standardised mortality ratios for coronary heart diseaseamong men aged 65-74 (1968-78)
The prenatal environment determines future disease risk
Developmental origins of health and disease
hIn 1986 David Barker showed that low birth weight is associated with an increased incidence of CVD and metabolic syndrome in later life
Mortality from coronary heart diseasebefore 65 years in 15,726 men and
women in Hertfordshire
< 5.5
5.5 -
6.56.5
- 7.5
7.5 -
8.58.5
- 9.5 >9
.50
50
100MenWomen
Birth weight (lbs)
Stan
dard
ised
mor
talit
y ra
tio
Prevalence of metabolic syndromeaccording to birth weight
(407 men aged 65yr)
< 5.5
5.5 - 6
.56.5
- 7.5
7.5 - 8
.58.5
- 9.5
>9.5
0
10
20
30
40
Birth weight (lbs)
Prev
alen
ce (%
)
hSubsequent epidemiological studies have confirmed a link between low birth weight and CVD
●and showed that smaller babies have an increased risk of
HypertensionRaised serum cholesterolType 2 diabetesObesityCancer
To study how the intrauterine environment may influence development and later risk of disease a number of animal models have been established
Eg
Low protein diet global dietary restriction
Animal Models
high blood pressureDyslipideamiaImpaired glucose toleranceVascular dysfunction
Early life environment
NutritionHormones
Oxygen
How does this work?
Future Actual PostnatalEnvironment
e.g. Poor Nutrition
Low Disease RiskAppropriate PAR
MATCH
Inc Disease RiskInappropriate PAR
MISMATCH
Future Actual PostnatalEnvironment
e.g. High Calorie Diet
AlternativeDevelopmental Path
ResponseEnvironmental Cue
e.g. Poor Nutrition
●
During development organisms can respond to an environmental stimulus which allows the organism to shifts its developmental path to produce a phenotype which confers a survival/reproductive advantage in postnatal life
Predictive adaptive responses (PAR)
Developmental PlasticStage
“prenatal environment”
Reduce energy demandsIncrease capacity for fat storageLess investment in muscle mass
A second developmental pathway to obesity?
Over-
nutrition in early life can also increase of obesity in later life
●a J/U shaped relationship has been seen between BW and rates of obesity/diabetes
In animal models: High fat feeding during pregnancy
over –feeding in early postnatal life
Birthweight (kg)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
-2.5 -3.0 -3.5 -4.0 -4.5 >4.5
Type-2 diabetes 1179 Pima Indians
aged 20-39 yrs
Age
adju
sted
pre
vale
nce
(%)
ObesityDiabetesCVD disturbances
Developmental plasticity
Genotype Fixed – Mutations rate and influence populations over evolutionary time scales
Phenotype Phenotype Phenotype Phenotype
Interaction with the (uterine) environment
Epigenetics
Definition: Processes that induced heritable changes in gene expression potential without a change in gene sequence
The major epigenetics
processes are
DNA methylation
Histone
modification
microRNAs
DNA MethylationiCytosine is methylated
to 5-methyl cytosine
i90% of methylated
cytosine is found as a dinucleotide
CpG
iCpGs are not randomly distributed throughout the genome but are clustered at the 5’
ends of genes
= methylation
= no methylation
Gene activity
++++
++
-Exon1 Exon 2
Exon1 Exon 2
Exon1 Exon 2
Exon1 Exon 2
+
methylation
Once established, these methylation patterns are then stably maintained throughout the life of an organism
Methylation patterns are largely establishment during development and early life
Tissue differentiation
muscle
skin
adipocyte
nerve
blood
1-carbon metabolism, which provides the methyl groups for virtually all methylation reactions, is highly dependent upon dietary methyl donors
and cofactors
(adapted from Santos & Dean)
Protein-restricted rat model
50% reduction in maternal protein intake during pregnancy, normal diet during lactation
Hypertension, dyslipidaemia, insulin resistance, altered kidney structure, increased cancer risk
Are epigenetic processes involved in the developmentalorigins of chronic diseases?
Glucocorticoid
receptor (GR)Peroxisome
proliferator
activated receptorα
(PPARα)
Control PR
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Maternal dietary group
mR
NA
con
cent
ratio
n co
mpa
red
to c
ontr
ol (%
)
*
PPARα
expression
Lillycrop et al. 2007
Control PR
0
100
200
300
400
500
*
Maternal dietary group
mR
NA
con
cent
ratio
n co
mpa
red
to c
ontr
ol (%
)
GR
expressionGR
methylation Gluconeogenesis
The PR diet induces altered epigenetic regulation
Β
oxidation
β hy
roxy
buty
rate
con
cent
ratio
n ( μ
mol
/l)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
con PR
maternal dietary group
Glu
cose
con
cent
ratio
n (m
mol
/l)
0
2
4
6
8
10
con PR
maternal dietary group
Control PR
0
100
200
300
400
500
Maternal dietary group
mR
NA
con
cent
ratio
n co
mpa
red
to c
ontr
ol (%
)
*
AOX expression
Control PR0
25
50
75
100
125
150 *
Maternal dietary group
mR
NA
con
cent
ratio
n co
mpa
red
to c
ontr
ol (%
)
PEPCK expression
Control PR
70
80
90
100
110
120
Maternal dietary group
DN
A m
ethy
latio
n co
mpa
red
toco
ntro
l (%
)
*
PPARα
methylation
Control PR
70
80
90
100
110
120
*
Maternal dietary group
DN
A m
ethy
latio
n co
mpa
red
toco
ntro
l (%
)
1 2+1 +251 +944 +1031-306-380
+259-537 CpG
Island
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 170
50
100
150
200
* * * *
CpG
Met
hyla
tion
(%R
elat
ive
toC
ontr
ol)
Maternal diet alters methylation of specific CpGs
in the PPARα
promoter
Day 34juvenile
Day 80adult
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 170
50
100
150
200 Control PR
* * * *
SP1 AHRCREB
SP1 HESFUSBPax9
NRF1ZFSFEGRG
CPBP WHNF
CpG
Met
hyla
tion
(%R
elat
ive
toC
ontr
ol)
Lillycrop et al. 2007
What about other nutritional challenges?
0
50
100
Con PR UN
% In
put
Liver PN84
- Global undernutrition
(UN) also induces GR hypomethylation
E14 fetal
liverE18 fetal
liver
control PR UN0
20
40
60
80
% o
f Inp
ut
0
1
2
3
Con PR UNM t l di t
% In
put
Over feeding in early life also induces altered DNA methylation
Plagemann A et al. 2009
Methylation blocks POMC activationBy hyperleptineamia
and hyperinsulineamia
POMC acts to reduce food intake Normally induced by leptin
and insulin
●
Over-feeding leads to the hypermethylation
of the POMC promoter
Litter size reduced to 3 pups Rapid fat accumulation ObesityCVD disturbances
Detect changes in methylation
Predict metabolic capacity & futuredisease
risk
Altered susceptibility to obesity
Protein restrictionGlobal restriction
Pregnancy
Lactation Weaning
Over-nutrition
Long term changes in gene expressionAltered metabolic capacity
Epigenotype
Altered DNA methylation
Epigenetic mark as predictive biomarkers?
Epigenetic marks as biomarkers?
In humans limited tissue availability?
Available tissues: Umbilical cordCord blood Placentabuccal
cellsBlood
Control PR80
90
100
110
P<0.0001
Maternal dietary group
Prom
oter
met
hyla
tion
rela
tive
toCo
ntro
l die
t (%
; mea
n ±SD
)
Rat umbilical cord PPARα
Control PR
7 0
8 0
9 0
1 0 0
1 1 0
1 2 0
M a te r n a l d ie ta r y g r o u p
DN
A m
ethy
latio
n co
mpa
red
toco
ntro
l (%
)
*
Rat Liver PPARα
Strategy for finding epigenetic biomarkers?
Are methylation marks at birth associated with later metabolic capacity?
Extracted DNA from umbilical cords from babies within the normal
birth weight range
Genome wide screen of gene promoter methylation using a MeDIP-
promoter array
Associations between methylation of CpGs
and outcome confirmed by bisulfite
sequencing (Sequenom)
Correlated methylation levels to phenotypic outcomes of the children age 9
Stability of methylation patterns?
Methylation in blood samples taken 11-20 years apart
Methylation in recent blood versus recent buccal samples
Heijmans et al., 2010
Can we intervene to prevent or reverse these methylationmarks?
Control Protein restricted Protein restricted + folic acid
Folate
supplementation of the protein restricted diet restores normal phenotype
HypertensionDyslipidemiaVascular dysfunction
Control PR PRF
70
80
90
100
110
120
Maternal dietary group
DN
A m
ethy
latio
n co
mpa
red
toco
ntro
l (%
)
*
Control PR PRF
70
80
90
100
110
120
*
Maternal dietary group
DN
A m
ethy
latio
n co
mpa
red
toco
ntro
l (%
)
PPARα
Glucocorticoid
Receptor
Control PR PRF
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Maternal dietary group
mR
NA
con
cent
ratio
n co
mpa
red
to c
ontr
ol (%
)
*
Control PR PRF
0
100
200
300
400
*
Maternal dietary group
mR
NA
con
cent
ratio
n co
mpa
red
to c
ontr
ol (%
)
Increased maternal folic acid intake prevents induction of altered epigenetic regulation
β-oxidation
Control PR PRF0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Maternal dietary group
β h
ydro
xybu
tyra
teco
ncen
trat
ion
( μm
ol/l)
Gluconeogenesis
Control PR PRF0.02.5
5
6
7
8
9
Maternal dietary group
Glu
cose
con
cent
ratio
n(m
mol
/l)
Lillycrop et al., 2005
Day 34
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
0
50
100
150
200 Control PR PRF
* * **
*
*
Sp1 AHRCREB
SP1 HESFPAX9
NRFWHNF
CREB
CpG
Met
hyla
tion
(% R
elat
ive
to C
ontro
l)
Lillycrop
et al. 2008
Increasing maternal folic acid intake induces hypermethylation of specific CpG dinucleotides
1.3%
Gene expression changes in PR and PRF offspring
0.7%
Can supplementation with folic acid after weaning reverse the changes in phenotypes and in gene methylation
induced by the PR diet ?
30
Control PR
d84
1 mg/kg FA
PWD
Pregnancy
Lactation
AIN93G
n = 13 to 18/ group
5 mg/kg FA 1 mg/kg FA 5 mg/kg FA
18% fat (1 mg/kg folic acid)
28d
28d
C/AF C/FS PR/AF PR/FS
β-Hydroxybutyrate
M Control A
F
M PR AFM Contro
l FS
M PR FS
0
100
200
300
400
**
*
Group
Con
cent
ratio
n ( μ
mol
/l, m
ean ±
SD)
Post weaning folic acid supplementation alters the phenotype andepigenotype
NormalFatty
Burdge et al., 2009
Conclusionshincreasing evidence that many chronic diseases originate at least in part in uterohepigenetic mechanisms are likely to play a key role in the developmental origins of disease
●
hInitial studies suggest that these altered epigenetic marks maybe used as predictive markers of future metabolic capacity and potential disease risk
hanimal studies have also show that it is possible to prevent/reversethese epigenetic marks offering the opportunity for intervention
conception birth weaning Growth maturation aging
In vitro cultureMaternal nutrition
Maternal behaviour Folic acid
Southampton
Graham Burdge
Emma GarrettPaula CostelloAbi
LaphamBecky ClarkeAmal
AlenadMark HansonKeith GodfreyTom FlemingCyrus Cooper
Auckland
Allan ShepherdMark VickersPeter Gluckman
Research ManagementCommittee The Gerald Kerkut
Charitable Trust
Acknowledgements
AmsterdamTessa Roseboom