the role of mobile in delivering universal service
DESCRIPTION
The role of mobile in delivering universal service. Dan Lloyd Vodafone. European Ministerial Conference on the Information Society Ljubjana 4 June 2002. Key themes. Importance of telecoms and mobile - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
The role of mobile in delivering universal
service
European Ministerial Conference on the Information Society
Ljubjana 4 June 2002
Dan Lloyd
Vodafone
Global fixed and mobile penetrationSource: ITU
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
Su
bs
mil
lio
ns
Fixed
Mobile
Key themes Importance of telecoms and mobile
Importance of investment, competition & regulatory environment - more important than universal service
Universal service mechanisms can’t make, but can break, a competitive telecoms market
Focus on the specific problems involved in the digital divide, not specific traditional solution - universal service
Mobile is already addressing the digital divide commercially - question the need for mobile inclusion in universal service schemes
Vodafone’s international experience
Importance of telecoms and mobile Large and increasing contribution to GDP
Enabler of commerce, e-commerce services
Key contributor to innovation and productivity growth in services
Increasingly important to international competitiveness
Approach to universal service, and regulation generally can have a substantial impact
Mobile increasingly vital to telecoms sector - global mobile penetration: 1991 - 1%; 2001 - 18.75%; 2008 - 36% (est)
Digital divide But access to telecoms services not spread evenly
within or between countries
Certain services considered so basic to social and economic inclusion - should be universally available
Generally driven by desire to foster social and economic inclusion, not economic efficiency
(But network externalities should also be taken into account in regulatory decision making)
Sometimes leads to regulation of universal service obligation (USO)
Digital divide Designed to address 3 basic categories of exclusion:
Poor - customers too poor to buy Uneconomic - to expensive to serve (often
geography) Special needs - disabled, deaf, poor dexterity
Excluded from what?
Telephony - fixed, pay phone, directory, emergency QOS Mobile? Internet? Broadband?
Let the market work where it can Key to maximising access to communications services
is not USO
Stable environment for investment - regulatory accountability, transparency, independence and predictability
Removal of artificial barriers to investment and to providing universal services
Effective competition law regime
Which enables a competitive telecommunications market
Mobile is already delivering
Services delivered
commercially
Digital divide /
potential USO
Influence of mobile
Theoretical 100%
penetration
No fixed7%
Fixed93%
Unphoned15%
Mobile and satisfied
85%
Mobile is already delivering - UK Mobile clearly minimising the telephony digital
divide without regulation. In the UK:
Leaving less than 1% unphoned - probably practical limit of universal service
Mobile is already delivering Mobile advantages:
pre-pay often low/no connection and/or monthly access
charges often network coverage beyond fixed line often averaged connection and call charges even for
those in uneconomic areas often geographically insensitive benefits of price competition in the most competitive
areas are received by all even where only one network social inclusion - voting
Mobile addresses poor and uneconomic commercially
Mobile is already delivering Remaining challenges
Disabled customershard of hearing - hearing aid compatible neck
loop, vibrating alert, SMS poor sight - directory connect services, voice-
activated dialling
Under-developed areasCommunity Mobile as payphone substituteBut must retain control over pricing
So question the utility of mobile universal service
Universal service scheme design Guiding principles of EU legislation to be
supported:
Least market distortion Dynamic approach Incentives for efficiency Transparency Non-discrimination Competitive neutrality Not more burdensome than necessary
Universal service scheme design
Scope of services
Recovery mechanism
Tech. neutrality
Pay or play
Industry fund
Cost/benefit
Burdensome
Internet? Consider removing adverse
regulationEligibility test
General taxation
Who receives?
Universal
service
fund
Transparent, efficient costing
Including intangible benefits
Transparency on customer bills
Universal service fund design
Regular independent audit of fund
Conclusions Focus on general environment, not universal service
Focus on the problem (access for poor, uneconomic and special needs) not a particular solution
Examine carefully whether problem being resolved by commercial mobile services
Examine critically whether regulation will produce better results than market forces
Design of any regulated universal service scheme critical