the role of religion in american politics 1787-1828: debates in the founding and early us court...
TRANSCRIPT
The Role of Religion in American
Politics 1787-1828: debates in the founding and early US Court
opinions
By: Kylie Ann Piercy
My Purpose
• Explain how the history of religion within the United States helped lead to the Separation of Church and State
• Separation of Church and State in America sets the foundation for the Constitution
• Court cases that evolved as a result of the Constitution and Bill of Rights
• What influence these court cases have had on judicial and presidential decisions
Map
-History
-Constitution
-Court Cases
-Contemporary Judicial and Presidential Decisions
-Conclusion
Native ReligionsFour Generalizations to Native American Culture
Map
-History Native Religions
Pluralism Unchurched Evangelical Revivalist Deism
-Constitution
-Court Cases
-Contemporary Judicial and Presidential Decisions
-Conclusion
No literacy until after European contact
More balanced gender role than Europeans
Existed in a less antagonistic relationship with rest of natural world
Culture and ways of life merge
PluralismMap
-History Native Religions Pluralism
Unchurched Evangelical Revivalist Deism
-Constitution
-Court Cases
-Contemporary Judicial and Presidential Decisions
-Conclusion
Catholicism
Episcopalians
Protestantism
Anglicanism
Lutheran-Calvinist Mainstream
Radical Reformation
Anabaptists
Western Christianity
Puritanism
Pilgrims
Unchurched
• The biggest group of all of these religions
• Regarded as anyone who do not attend church services at all even for religious holidays
• 1776- Fifteen Percent attended a church on a regular basis
• 1900s- influx of Fifty Percent of people attended church regularly
Map
-History Native Religions Pluralism Unchurched
Evangelical Revivalist Deism
-Constitution
-Court Cases
-Contemporary Judicial and Presidential Decisions
-Conclusion
Evangelical RevivalistMap
-History Native Religions Pluralism Unchurched Evangelical Revivalist
Deism
-Constitution
-Court Cases
-Contemporary Judicial and Presidential Decisions
-Conclusion
•Evangelized to the unchurched group of people and contained multiple religions
•Methodists and Baptists
•Presbyterians split into Conservatives and New Light Factions
•Lutheran Pietists split from Lutherans
•Congregationalists broke off Baptists
• http://caffeinatedthoughts.com/2009/08/the-american-evangelical-mind-revivalism/
DeismMap
-History Native Religions Pluralism Unchurched Evengelical Revivalist Deism
-Constitution
-Court Cases
-Contemporary Judicial and Presidential Decisions
-Conclusion
• “The Laws of Nature and Nature’s God”
•Believed that God created the world but that after creation he left
•Stressed freedom of principles- laws not biased to any religion
• Three Deist founding fathers: Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, and Benjamin Franklin
•Ideas of Deism within the United States foundational legal structure
• http://www.princetonol.com/groups/iad/links/constitution.html
Constitution
Memorial and Remonstrance
• 1874- subscribed by James Madison
• “established provision for teachers of the Christian religion”
• Fighting against a bill that called for the financing of religious activity of a non-discriminatory basis
• Bill was denied
Map
-History
-Constitution Memorial and Remonstrance Jefferson’s Virginia Bill Article VI Bill of Rights Jefferson’s Letter
-Court Cases
-Contemporary Judicial and Presidential Decisions
-Conclusion
Map
-History
-Constitution Memorial and Remonstrance Jefferson’s Virginia Bill Article VI Bill of Rights Jefferson’s Letter
-Court Cases
-Contemporary Judicial and Presidential Decisions
-Conclusion
Jefferson’s Virginia Bill of
1786“That to suffer the civil magistrate to intrude his powers into the field of opinion, and to restrain the profession or propagation of principles on supposition of their ill tendency, it is dangerous fallacy which at once destroys all religious liberty,” and it is declared, “that it is time enough for the rightful purposes of civil government for its officers to interfere when principles break out into overt acts against peace and good order.”
Article VI• “No religious test shall ever be as a
qualification to any office or public Trust under the United States.”
• Example: Presidential Oath to Office
Map
-History
-Constitution Memorial and RemonstranceJefferson’s Virginia Bill Article VI
Bill of Rights Jefferson’s Letter
-Court Cases
-Contemporary Judicial and Presidential Decisions
-Conclusion http://www.google.com/images/georgewashington
Bill of Rights
• First Amendment– “Congress shall make no law respecting
an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
Map
-History
-Constitution Memorial and RemonstranceJefferson’s Virginia Bill Article VI Bill of Rights
Jefferson’s Letter
-Court Cases
-Contemporary Judicial and Presidential Decisions
-Conclusion
Jefferson’s Letter
• http://www.freeinfosociety.com/article.php?id=271
Map
-History
-Constitution Memorial and RemonstranceJefferson’s Virginia Bill Article VI Bill of Rights Jefferson’s Letter
-Court Cases
-Contemporary Judicial and Presidential Decisions
-Conclusion
• Phrasing of ‘Separation of Church and State’• Letter to Danbury Baptist Association
• http://law.marquette.edu/facultyblog/2009/06/01/supreme-court-weighs-in-on-issue-preclusion-in-criminal-cases/
Court Cases
Reynolds v. United States
Map
-History-Constitution
-Court Cases Reynolds v. United States
Everson v. Board of Education of Township of Ewing Lemon v. Kurtzman Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow Lee v. Weisman
-Contemporary Judicial and Presidential Decisions
-Conclusion
• Questioned the Free Exercise of Religion
• Opinion given by Chief Justice Waite
• Holding: “Every person having a husband or wife living, who marries another, whether married or single, in a Territory, or other place over which the United States have exclusive jurisdiction, is guilty of bigamy, and shall be punished by a fine of not more than $500, and by imprisonment for a term of no more than five years…”
Everson v. Board of Education of Township of
Ewing
Map
-History
-Constitution
-Court Cases Reynolds v. United States Everson v. Board of Education of Township of Ewing
Lemon v. Kurtzman Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow Lee v. Weisman
-Contemporary Judicial and Presidential Decisions
-Conclusion
• Questioned Free Exercise and Establishment Clauses
• Opinion given by Chief Justice Black
• Holding: “Neither a state nor a Federal Government can set up a church. Neither can pass laws which aid one religion, aid all religions, or prefer one religion over another.”
Lemon v. KurtzmanMap
-History
-Constitution
-Court Cases Reynolds v. United States Everson v. Board of Education of Township of Ewing Lemon v. Kurtzman
Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow Lee v. Weisman
-Contemporary Judicial and Presidential Decisions
-Conclusion
Lemon Test
•Establishment of religion now built off of a three prong test
•Opinion given by Chief Justice Burger
Secular PurposeDoes not advance or inhibit religion
Cannot promote and excessive government entanglement with religion
Elk Grove Unified School District v.
Newdow
Map
-History
-Constitution
-Court Cases Reynolds v. United States Everson v. Board of Education of Township of Ewing Lemon v. Kurtzman Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow
Lee v. Weisman
-Contemporary Judicial and Presidential Decisions
-Conclusion
• “Under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance
• Heard by three panel judge
• District Court held that the Pledge did not pass the Lemon Test because it endorsed religion
• 2002-2004 there were continuous appeals
• March 24, 2004 cases dismissed
Lee v. WeismanMap
-History
-Constitution
-Court Cases Reynolds v. United States Everson v. Board of Education of Township of Ewing Lemon v. Kurtzman Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow Lee v. Weisman
-Contemporary Judicial and Presidential Decisions
-Conclusion
• Courts found prayer within extracurricular activities debatable.
• 5-4 decision agreed with Weisman
• Against second prong of the Lemon test
• Prayers are religious in general and against the Establishment Clause
• Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe
• http://www.enchantedlearning.com/history/us/symbols/presidentialseal/
Judicial and Presidential Issues
Judge Moore “Ten Commandments
Judge”• The court testified that the monument
failed on two of the three requirements of the Lemon test, and Moore’s arguments were found very unconvincing
• Chief Justice Moore claimed that by placing into the building he was “acknowledging the law and sovereignty of the God of the Holy Scriptures, and that it was intended to acknowledge ‘God’s overruling power over the affairs of men’.”
• Justice Moore eventually removed from his position also
Map
-History
-Constitution
-Court Cases
-Contemporary Judicial and Presidential Decisions Judge Moore
George W. Bush
-Conclusion
President George Bush’s faith-based initiative
organizations
• George Bush’s proposals asked for religious organizations to “compete for more government contracts and grants without a strict separation between their religious activities and social service programs.”
• Seen as a violation of the right to free speech of many “taxpayers who are now forced to support the spread of ideas they oppose”
Map
-History
-Constitution
-Court Cases
-Contemporary Judicial and Presidential Decisions Judge Moore George W. Bush
-Conclusion
ConclusionMap
-History
-Constitution
-Court Cases
-Contemporary Judicial and Presidential Decisions
-Conclusion
•The understanding of the structure of religious background is important to understand how Deism played a major part in the ideals that the foundational structure of this country was built on
•As a result of religions imperative role throughout history, there have been many new legislations that had to come about, such as Article 6, First Amendment, and the Bill of Rights
•As a result of different circumstances and the need for revision court cases have evolved and played an influence on not just the populous but also on judicial and presidential decisions.
References• Gunther, Gerald. Constitutional Law: Cases and Materials. 10 th edition. University Casebook Series. Mineola, NY. The Foundation Press, Inc. 1980.• Lippy, Charles H. Christianity Comes to the Americas: 1492-1776. New York, New York. Paragon House. 1992. • Burr, Nelson. A Critical Bibliography of Religion in America. Vol IV. Part 3,4, and 5. Princeton, New Jersey. Princeton University Press. 1961. • Konvitz, Milton R. Bill of Rights Reader: Leading Constitutional Cases. 5th edition. Cornell University Press. Brook Street, London. 1973. Burr, Nelson. A Critical Bibliography of Religion in America. Vol. IV. Part 1 and 2. Princeton University Press. Princeton, New Jersey. 1961.• Hulsether, Mark. Religion, culture and Politics in the Twentieth-Century United States. Columbia University Press. New York. 2007. • Labunski, Richard. James Madison and the struggle for the Bill of Rights. Oxford University Press. New York. 2006.• Epstein, Alex. Capitalism Magazine: Bush’s Faith Based Initiative Is an Assault on the Wall Between Church and State. 9 June 2004. 2010. Ayn Randr Institute. http://www.capitalismmagazine.com/culture/religion/3729-Bushs-Faith-Based-Initiative-Assault-the-Wall-Between-Church-and-State.html• Craig, Edward. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Questions to sociobiology. Vol 8. Routledge Inc. New York, New York. 1998.Mount, Steve. “Constitutional Topic: Martial Law.” USConstitution.net. 29 Jun 2010. http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_reli.html