the single name corporate cds...

26
The Single Name Corporate CDS Market Alan White

Upload: others

Post on 25-Sep-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Single Name Corporate CDS Marketweb-docs.stern.nyu.edu/salomon/docs/Credit2006/Alan_White.pdfMarket Growth Notional Outstanding 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 1995

The Single Name Corporate CDS Market

Alan White

Page 2: The Single Name Corporate CDS Marketweb-docs.stern.nyu.edu/salomon/docs/Credit2006/Alan_White.pdfMarket Growth Notional Outstanding 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 1995

CDS StructureSingle Name DJ Index Products

CDS

Buyer SellerNotional x [ ] bp p.a.

Credit Risk of ABC

Buyer Seller

Delivery 10MM Principal ABC Sr. Unsecured Debt

$10 MM Cash

125 Equally Weighted Names

CDS CDS CDS CDS CDS

CDS CDS CDS CDS CDS

CDS CDS CDS CDS CDS

CDS CDS CDS CDS CDS

CDS CDS CDS CDS CDS

CDS CDS CDS CDS CDS

CDS CDS CDS CDS CDS

CDS CDS CDS CDS CDS

CDS CDS CDS CDS CDS

CDS CDS CDS CDS CDS

CDS CDS CDS CDS CDS

CDS CDS CDS CDS CDS

CDS CDS CDS CDS CDS

CDS CDS CDS CDS CDS

Page 3: The Single Name Corporate CDS Marketweb-docs.stern.nyu.edu/salomon/docs/Credit2006/Alan_White.pdfMarket Growth Notional Outstanding 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 1995

Market Growth Notional Outstanding

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

US Corp. DebtGlobal CDSCDS Index

Page 4: The Single Name Corporate CDS Marketweb-docs.stern.nyu.edu/salomon/docs/Credit2006/Alan_White.pdfMarket Growth Notional Outstanding 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 1995

CDX-IG Index Industry Composition

7.4%

18.9%

15.6%

4.9%

19.7%

10.7%

2.5%

14.8%

5.7%

Materials Consumer,Cyclical

Consumer,NonCyc.

Energy Financial Industrial Tech. Comm. Utilites

Page 5: The Single Name Corporate CDS Marketweb-docs.stern.nyu.edu/salomon/docs/Credit2006/Alan_White.pdfMarket Growth Notional Outstanding 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 1995

CDX-IG Index Moody’s Ratings

3.2%0.8% 1.6% 0.8%

4.0%

12.0%

16.0% 16.8%

27.2%

17.6%

Aaa Aa1 Aa2 Aa3 A1 A2 A3 Baa1 Baa2 Baa3

Page 6: The Single Name Corporate CDS Marketweb-docs.stern.nyu.edu/salomon/docs/Credit2006/Alan_White.pdfMarket Growth Notional Outstanding 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 1995

End Users

Banks, 38%

Securities firms, 16%

Insurance Companies,

20%

Other, 4%

Hedge Funds, 15%

Corporations, 2%

Mutual Funds, 4%

Protection Sellers

Insurance Companies, 7%

Banks, 51%

Hedge Funds, 16%

Other, 3%

Corporations, 3%

Securities firms, 16%

Mutual Funds, 3%

Protection Buyers

Page 7: The Single Name Corporate CDS Marketweb-docs.stern.nyu.edu/salomon/docs/Credit2006/Alan_White.pdfMarket Growth Notional Outstanding 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 1995

Risk and Return

Page 8: The Single Name Corporate CDS Marketweb-docs.stern.nyu.edu/salomon/docs/Credit2006/Alan_White.pdfMarket Growth Notional Outstanding 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 1995

Corporate Bonds vs. CDS

Credit Risk

ABC Corporate CDS

Allows direct trading of credit risk

Credit Risk

Interest Rate Risk

ABC Corporate Bond Return

Page 9: The Single Name Corporate CDS Marketweb-docs.stern.nyu.edu/salomon/docs/Credit2006/Alan_White.pdfMarket Growth Notional Outstanding 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 1995

Arbitrage Trade

• Buy the bond, buy protection earn the risk-free rate of interest

• Make a riskless investment, sell protection earn the bond yield

⇒ CDS spread, s ≈ y – r

⇒ return on trade, r ≈ y – s

Page 10: The Single Name Corporate CDS Marketweb-docs.stern.nyu.edu/salomon/docs/Credit2006/Alan_White.pdfMarket Growth Notional Outstanding 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 1995

Comparing with Treasury and Swap Rates

1.06–6.511.3862.97All Ratings

2.79–2.213.6384.93Baa

1.59–5.831.8264.33A

1.31–9.55 1.9751.30Aaa / Aa

S.E.MeanS.E.Mean

r – rSr – rT

Rating

Spreads In Basis Points

Page 11: The Single Name Corporate CDS Marketweb-docs.stern.nyu.edu/salomon/docs/Credit2006/Alan_White.pdfMarket Growth Notional Outstanding 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 1995

Ratings and CDS Spreads

Page 12: The Single Name Corporate CDS Marketweb-docs.stern.nyu.edu/salomon/docs/Credit2006/Alan_White.pdfMarket Growth Notional Outstanding 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 1995

CDS Spreads and Ratings EventsConditioning on Ratings Event

Negative Outlook

Review for Downgrade

Downgrade

Event

0.62.017.7**7.0*4.069

-1.09.9**14.6**3.26.0*114

8.23.815.0**8.4**14.1**83

1, 10–1, 1–30, –1–60, – 31–90, – 61n

Window (days relative to event)

Average CDS Spread Change (bp)

* 5% significance** 1% significance

Page 13: The Single Name Corporate CDS Marketweb-docs.stern.nyu.edu/salomon/docs/Credit2006/Alan_White.pdfMarket Growth Notional Outstanding 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 1995

CDS Spreads and Ratings EventsConditioning on CDS Spread Changes

1528**37**10

48**46**59**25

68**72**80**50

Negative Outlook

Review for DowngradeDowngradep

* 5% significance** 1% significance

Percent of events in following 30 days in the subset of firms with the top p% of credit spreads

Page 14: The Single Name Corporate CDS Marketweb-docs.stern.nyu.edu/salomon/docs/Credit2006/Alan_White.pdfMarket Growth Notional Outstanding 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 1995

Recovery Rates and Probability of Default

Page 15: The Single Name Corporate CDS Marketweb-docs.stern.nyu.edu/salomon/docs/Credit2006/Alan_White.pdfMarket Growth Notional Outstanding 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 1995

CDS Structure

0.00 0.25 1.000.50 1.501.250.75 1.75

P(s / 4) Accrual

1 – PD(0.25) … ……

PD(1.75) – PD(1.50)

LGD = P(1 – R)

… … … … …

… …

Page 16: The Single Name Corporate CDS Marketweb-docs.stern.nyu.edu/salomon/docs/Credit2006/Alan_White.pdfMarket Growth Notional Outstanding 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 1995

Extracting Hazard Rates – IFixed Recovery Model

• CDS value is the PV of payments weighted by the probability that the payment occurs

• Often set• Find the hazard rate λ that sets the CDS value to

zero • Implied λ is sensitive to assumed recovery rate, R

( ) ( )1 expPD t t= − −λ

Page 17: The Single Name Corporate CDS Marketweb-docs.stern.nyu.edu/salomon/docs/Credit2006/Alan_White.pdfMarket Growth Notional Outstanding 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 1995

Implied Hazard Rates

Implied Hazard RateCDS Spread = 50 bp

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Recovery Rate

Page 18: The Single Name Corporate CDS Marketweb-docs.stern.nyu.edu/salomon/docs/Credit2006/Alan_White.pdfMarket Growth Notional Outstanding 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 1995

A Recovery ModelHamilton, Varma, Ou, and Cantor 2005

Page 19: The Single Name Corporate CDS Marketweb-docs.stern.nyu.edu/salomon/docs/Credit2006/Alan_White.pdfMarket Growth Notional Outstanding 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 1995

Gaussian Copula

• Latent variable• Conditioning on x

( )0,1x N

( ) ( )( )

( )( )

1

1

1

10.52 6.9

1

N PD t xPD t x N

N PD xR x N

⎡ ⎤− ρ= ⎢ ⎥

−ρ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎡ ⎤− ρ

= − × ⎢ ⎥−ρ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Page 20: The Single Name Corporate CDS Marketweb-docs.stern.nyu.edu/salomon/docs/Credit2006/Alan_White.pdfMarket Growth Notional Outstanding 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 1995

Conditional 1-Year PDUnconditional PD(1) = 0.02

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1PD(1|x)

Pro

babi

lity

rho = 0.0001rho = 0.1rho = 0.2rho = 0.3

Page 21: The Single Name Corporate CDS Marketweb-docs.stern.nyu.edu/salomon/docs/Credit2006/Alan_White.pdfMarket Growth Notional Outstanding 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 1995

Conditional Recovery RateUnconditional PD(1) = 0.02

40.5%39.3%38.4%38.2%Exp. Recovery

0.30.20.10.0001Rho

0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5

R | x

Prob

abili

ty rho = 0.0001rho = 0.1rho = 0.2rho = 0.3

Page 22: The Single Name Corporate CDS Marketweb-docs.stern.nyu.edu/salomon/docs/Credit2006/Alan_White.pdfMarket Growth Notional Outstanding 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 1995

Extracting Hazard Rates – IIVariable Recovery Model

• For CDS with spread s, hazard rate λ, copula correlation ρ, and latent variable value x, the probabilities of default are known and the conditional CDS value can be computed

• Integrating the conditional values over x produces the unconditional CDS value

• λIC(s, ρ) is the copula implied hazard rate,

VC(s, λIC(s, ρ), ρ) = 0

Page 23: The Single Name Corporate CDS Marketweb-docs.stern.nyu.edu/salomon/docs/Credit2006/Alan_White.pdfMarket Growth Notional Outstanding 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 1995

Extracting Recovery Rates

• EC[R(λ, ρ)] is the expected recovery rate under the copula model found by integrating over the latent variable

• RIF(s, λIC) is the implied fixed recovery rate based on the copula implied hazard rate

Page 24: The Single Name Corporate CDS Marketweb-docs.stern.nyu.edu/salomon/docs/Credit2006/Alan_White.pdfMarket Growth Notional Outstanding 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 1995

Copula Implied Hazard Rate

0.5%

0.6%

0.7%

0.8%

0.9%

1.0%

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9

Copula Correlation

2.0%

2.2%

2.4%

2.6%

2.8%

3.0%

CDS spread = 50 bp

CDS spread = 200 bp

Page 25: The Single Name Corporate CDS Marketweb-docs.stern.nyu.edu/salomon/docs/Credit2006/Alan_White.pdfMarket Growth Notional Outstanding 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 1995

Recovery Rates

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1Copula Correlation

Implied R s=50 E(R) s=50

Implied R s=200 E(R) s=200

Page 26: The Single Name Corporate CDS Marketweb-docs.stern.nyu.edu/salomon/docs/Credit2006/Alan_White.pdfMarket Growth Notional Outstanding 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 1995

Conclusion

• If CDS quotes reflect a recovery model in which probability of default and recovery are negatively related, and

• A fixed recovery rate model is used to infer probabilities of default

• The appropriate recovery rate needed to determine the probability of default is much lower than intuition would suggest