THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

HILLSBORO UGH, SS. SUPERIOR COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT Docket No. 216-2015-CR-00615

I, W. Michael Scanlon, Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of New Hampshire for the County of Hillsborough, the same being a court of record having a seal, and having custody of the records of said Superior Court, do hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of the Complaint dated May 11, 2015, in State v Ghislain Breton, ST 15-CR• 00619, together with Return, Notice: Undue Burden, Grand Jury, Exhibit A, Exhibit B, Idiot w/Exhibit A, Common Law, Rights w/Exhibit A, False Statement, and Order from Gus

n witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said Superior Court this 9th day of June, 2015. ----k

,P,41.1,1 4Z:a

Clerk of Superior Court

against the peace and dignity of the State.

Docket i-Vito 5: - gp7;444 # j 07507C, Zile *ate of iTeixt panyeliire 8

COMPLAINT 2 CASE #. 15-7821

❑

MAY 1 1 2015 VIOLATION 0 CLASS A MISDEMEANOR a FELONY

El CLASS B

YOU ARE TO APPEAR BEFORE THE COURT LISTED BELOW AT 08.15 O'CLOCK IN THE AM/P0 ON May 11 YR. UNDER PENALTY OF LAW TO ANSWER TO A COMPLAINT 1 ' CHARGING YOU WITH THE FOLLOWING OFFENSE:

TO '11-1E gtheir"anchesteriDebURT COUNTY OF Hillsborough

THE UNDERSIGNED COMPLAINS THAT: PLEASE PRINT

NAME BRETON, GHISLAIN usiName Finrt Name

35 AUSTIN ST MANCHESTER NH 03102 Aggress

Slate

DOB a/1811°64OP. ,IC .#

WRITE OUT:

5 0

BRO BLU Race

Height

Weight Color of Hair Color of Fylis

❑ COMM. VE1-1. 111 COMM. DR. LIC. ❑ HAL. MAT. ❑ 16+ PASSENGER

AT Bndne St Manchester. NH (Location) A.M.

YR. 2015at 3:25p .m . ON THE 11 DAY OF May

on/at in said county and state, did commit the offense of

Felon In Possession Of Firearm/deadly 158:3 contrary to RSA

and the laws of New Hampshire for which the defendant should be held to answer, in that the defendant did having been convicted of a a felony against the person or property of another or a felony relating to controlled drugs as defined in RSA 318-B, (Wtness Tampering in the Merrimack Couty Superior Court on or about 10-4-2004) the defendant knowingly had a loaded Springfield. 46 under his control behind t„1--e driver's seat of the -vehicle he was driNf t7

ER SERVED IN HAND

Ckief David. J. Mara Liattgetk Al Manchester PD

M i

.(-) /„ _ HNSC #216

HG lGij 1 CS (e,

Complainant Rnoter Name Dot

Making a false statement on this complaint may result in criminal prosecution. Oath below not required for police officers unless complaint charges class A misdemeanor or felony (RSA 592-A:7, I).

Personally appeared the above named complainant and made oath that the above complaint by him/her subsc

DATE 5/11/2015

is, in his/her belief,

.0435/13 lustily the Peace COURT COPY

5 1 1 1 fir at

to at - 0 o

er.r.runit Defeneant: 0 of constitutional rights 0 Waived counsel_

7 a, ,•••• clefee....1 - • "issigatneitt of ... . . fot detenda ,• ,•

Promed . date.. .. • 0Guile/ 12,-;! Nurevii tallolo Contendere , No Piet" -

17 Clikange !?!.;eti Noio L Guilty Guilty 3 Negotiated Plea date

❑ Not Guilts; INstnisged

See attached Se•trencirif.... Order.

' FL,le argil. suspended $ LT' PA Susp. F.Tr?' deferred $ PA $ ❑ PA Deferreci

-r. ,-.tri-,trittrit to liciust of Cdtzet-Lion foi7. days ritSahis

- ItiOnthS

pay-merit of $. tine (see,eonditions below)

• ray.ae f•tzconuiiendeclbefendant's license (rights) to operate ir'o; iirMclellc L- I suspencle ,1 ❑ revoked for a perlo

-lays ....•• months. years &/..4 2roOation !et

s,--:ncf-‘11Ct., 0 Complaint placed on file [-; with •yittl4ski , Ancling.

re iAbpear. ❑ Bait forfeited $ • issue New Bail $,

1•e (teterrnmed b Bari Commissioner $ • •

riaiz &it COUIL

-•• -4'0..itt - • .. .. • i• • 'f"' . r.:ro•-•:t

-t: err -- =. . • • .Er:'"f E • 1-

CD

A True Cory Attest:

pia ,6oicfaL, ;PPEA1

11;-.01-.3ABLE CAUSL•:- F 1 1:1 uTtivee -

. • • B??! -otrunitted a,prt.4-tett

Battr, OW.

Vfflawili.1400

THPSTATE OF NEW HAMPSIRRE JUDICIAL BRANCH

SUPERIOR COURT Hillsborough Superior Court Northern District 300 Chestnut Street Manchester NH 03101

RETURN FROM SUPERIOR COURT

Case Name: State v. Ghislain Breton Case Number: 216-2015-CR-00619

Name: Ghislain Breton, 35 Austin St Manchester NH 03102

DOB: September 18, 1964

❑ Indictment Ej Waiver ❑ Information Complaint

Offense: Charge ID: RSA: 9 Feloll ill PUbbU bblUI I Of Dangerous 1075467C 15:3

Weapon

456-2015-CR-2672

TPlAphone: 1-855-21?-1234 TTY/TDD Relay: (800) 735-2964

http://www.courts.state.nh.us

Orr,1-, ,,+inel v *JUG LI %.,/

Date of Offense: l`v"ay 11, 2015

Disposition: I Not Guilty Z None Pros L Quashed/Dismissed Remand

Date: June 01, 2015

By: 7 Judge

Jury Prosecutor

Name of Prosecutor: Charlene F. Dulac, ESQ.

C: [3] State Police ❑ DMV Dept. of Corr. Z Defendant Z Pros. Atty Charlene F. Dulac, ESQ ❑ OCC 1:1 Defense Atty Z Other Jail ❑ Dist Ct. #

I/1

NHJB-2574-S (07/01/2011)

notice: undue burden in regards to

"456-2015-CR-02672"

i, man, declare;

i, a man without title or representation, and the man William H. Lyons, as well as

other man and woman at court, did witness on May 19, 2015, the man David J.

Mara did fail to appear before me, face to face, in open court to verify any claim,

complaint or statement; the man David J. Mara does continue to cause i harm,

injury and loss by way of "456-2015-CR-02672";

i require "456-2015-CR-02672" forthwith discharged or brought to the attention of

the county prosecutor and the Grand Jury Foreman;

, . , i / -S=4 y /2 ere_ a gal i„/; .. e c1 V i A) 6.1.) 6,0 C (9 64,r I---

447 c I-- q / 4e re ;A) b e 54- - - q_e. - /

- It e- 7 frtv-e_

/ Su/

4/0 scL,e1,,,. le

A)

notice: Grand Jury in regards to "456-2015-CR-02672"

i, man, declare;

i am held without knowledge of the wrong i am accused of and of whom i am

accused by; i require to exercise my rights in common law to face and cross

examine my accuser under oath or affirmation before a 'common law' Grand Jury;

to be fully heard by said jury (see Exhibits A and B);

A ere. b e -4-4t&

4

Exhibit A

This, i believe:

Acts 24:8 Commanding his accusers to come unto thee: by examining of whom thyself mayest take knowledge of all these things, whereof we accuse him.

Acts 25:5 Let them therefore, said he, which among you are able, go down with me, and accuse this man, if there be any wickedness in him.

Acts 25:8 While he answered for himself, Neither against the law of the Jews, neither against the temple, nor yet against Caesar, have I offended any thing at all.

Acts 25:10 Then said Paul, I stand at Caesar's judgment seat, where I ought to be judged: to the Jews have I done no wrong, as thou very well knowest.

Acts 25:16 To whom I answered, It is not the manner of the Romans to deliver any man to die, before that he which is accused have the accusers face to face, and have licence to answer for himself concerning the crime laid against him.

[Cf. Compare my beliefs above with those found within the State of New-

Hampshire Bill of Rights at Article 15: "No subject shall be held to answer for any

crime, or offense, until the same is fully and plainly, substantially and formally,

described to him; or be compelled to accuse or furnish evidence against himself.

Every subject shall have a right to produce all proofs that may be favorable to

himself; to meet the witnesses against him face to face, and to be fully heard in

his defense, by himself, and counsel...")

Exhibit B page 1 of 3

When i speak of "common law", i speak of the law described by Paul Samuel Reinsch in his 1899 "English Common Law in the early American Colonies" in which he explains how American cormnon law derives from the Word of God and not from the precedents of the English Common Law (codes and statutes).

English Common Law in the early American Colonies

[ ISBN-10: 1296260429 ISBN-13: 978-1296260422 I

Page 11 Massachusetts

The ideas of the Massachusetts colonists on the matter of law appear very clearly from a resolve of the general court of the year 1636. The government is there entreated to make a draft of laws "agreeable to the word of God" to be the fundamental laws of the commonwealth. This draft is to be presented to the next general court. In the meantime, the magistrates are to proceed in the courts to determine all causes according to the laws then established and where there is no law "then as near to the law of God as they can".

Page 25 Connecticut and New Haven

In Connecticut and New Haven we find a development similar to that of Massachusetts. The Connecticut code of 1642 was copied from that of Massachusetts. The fundamental order of New Haven provides for the popular election of the magistrate, and for the punishment of criminals "according to the mind of God revealed in his word." The general court is also to proceed according to the Scriptures, the rule of all righteous laws and sentences. In the fundamental agreement all freemen assent the Scriptures hold forth a perfect rule for the direction and government of all men, in all duties. The scriptural laws of inheritance, dividing allotments, and all things of like nature are adopted, thus very clearly founding the entire system of civil and criminal law on the word of God.

page 2 of 3

Page 27

New Hampshire

... The general court petitioned against appeals to England in 1680. The settlers were so im atient of control that all uestions of law and fact were decided by juries. The judges had a term of one year only and none of the influence of the Massachusetts magistrates. Under this regime, the administration of the rules of the [English] common law would of course be impossible. The early judges and chief justices were all business men, seamen, or farmers; only in 1726 did a man of liberal education, Judge Jaffray, graduate of Harvard in 1702, appear on the bench. And it was only in 1754 that a lawyer, Theodore Atkinson, also a graduate of Harvard, became chief justice. Samuel Livermore, chief justice in 1782, though trained in the law, refused to he bound by precedents, holding, "that every tub should stand on its own bottom;" and looking upon the adjudications of English tribunals only as illustrations. It may be said that no real jurist, no man acknowledging a regular development of the law by precedents and finding an authoritative guidance in the adjudications of the [English] common law judges, held judicial power in New Hampshire during the entire 18th century.

Last paragraph of page 54

The records that have been examined exhibit every-where, especially in the popular courts, a great informality in judicial proceedings. The large number of judges in these courts would of itself tend to make the practice informal, to make the trial more like a deliberation of a community by its representatives on the justice or injustice of the case involved. The absence of a jurist class, and especially the universal prejudice against lawyers, proves that a popular and not a technical system was being enforced. The technical knowledge of the lawyer was not demanded, and, ... lawyers had to turn their hands to semi-professional or non-professional work, the courts of the colonies at that date having no need of the aid of a trained profession to discover what was the law, as the customs of the time the law was in so many cases determined by the discretion of the court. — i.e. the jury

page 3 of 3

Page 55

It seems just to conclude that in most cases the administration of law was carried on not by the technical rules of a developed system of jurisprudence but by a popular tribunal according to the general popular sense of right.

The original element in the early colonial laws are great in number and import. They foreshadow and anticipate some of the most far-reaching American Law reforms. Pleading is simplified, and the intention is in many places expressed that it shall be possible for any man of ordinary intelligence to plead his own cause before the courts.

Mary Barton 9th Circuit - District Division - Manchester 35 _Amherst Street Manchester NH 03101

RECEIVED MAY 1 Li9O1c, v‘I

MAC ESTER DISTRCT GNU

Regarding: "456-2015-CR-02672"

May 19, 2015

Dear Mary, greeting;

please find enclosed for filing in "456-2015-CR-02672"

Notice; Idiot Notice; Common Law Notice; Rights Notice; False Statement Order

a copy of which i verify to give to Carissa Pelletier or her office on this 19th day of May, 2015.

Thanks for your attention to this matter,

Gus

RECEIVED n

Hill i

MANCHESTER DISTRC1 GOIIRT

1 p

I Say k)e-pe, / a Kid w11( /on 1-y

11 I . rAerel`k.) )De__

tit./idiot ryti P • C ,

in regards to

"456-2015-CR-02672"

LT e it9-re_ 4-- 4.4) 11-41161(.41

, /-I e or r

1ef re e *frtk.frl a/j

I° 4t) A f_1A-S.1-0*-,N3 OP 4e.

rrl a A.) i 1 ie„,„, 16,e 10_,

V v goci ‘e1-/ (see61191-1- ,Q)

or e IL- c 1—

Exhibit A

from http://www.etymonline.com

idiot: "ordinary person, layman; outsider, person lacking professional skill,

(opposed to writer, soldier, skilled workman), literally "private

person" (as opposed to one taking part in public affairs),"

idiotic: "unprofessional, unskilled; not done by rules of art"

legalese: ""the language of legal documents," 1914, from legal + language

name ending -ese."

tler y

be

it3 of etu A 'e re

OLR IA,ere...m.-3

Notice: Common Law REcErvED in regards to \\111\Y 1 9 2015

"456-2015-CR-02672" 00619 DISIKT

()Ink) r evoke a 0r-v' jr -V u0 / I ILIA..,

l j rei tA,Ire extk.r)-- ✓ cord

1/ ki I I ikry

e,..) 117a cd

A ere. N.)

notice: rights in regards to

"456-2015-CR-02672"

yvta

RECEIVED mg 1 9 2(115

MANCHESTER DISTRICT GOUR1

/, 4.1 "'La n1Ar D

k) ni„, 02015 /A) e Yh( r;7 ht (10 Li-raiie

tY

Exhibit A [Cf. Part First: Article 2; All men have certain natural, essential, and inherent

rights - among which are, the enjoying and defending life and liberty; acquiring,

possessing, and protecting, property; and, in a word, of seeking and obtaining

happiness.]

• i believe governments exist to secure rights and protect property of man;

• i believe no man or woman will verify in open court, under oath or affirmation,

that i did operate under license;

• contrary to the purpose of government, the woman Meghan Grant does cause

harm to man;

RECEIVED

notice: false statement

MAY 1 9 2015

in regards to MANCHESTER DISTRICT COURT

"456-2015-CR-02672"

( ff 7)1e4"%) e-( 1 e e (de ry) ni D )101 Nam

ia,y s 0- '-ek is e. te.--Ni 1— ad c„ y (.04,y r

4156- - .2015 - 4,2002 1C SA.1(.1 s:41.1-er a'VJ ch (0/, does

Cca.t.t.,S e Q to ci -9 ha I It_y kArt at.)Qci boss

1/ i :/ Yn K Sc Mew

hefore nne :A) Or c-49k. r dtt) Mar IR, c9ors

or 4rt)er )1 0 1

■ e

1 Sy i)e. re_ a tud W ri 1/r of e ceur f- j-lia

all e re-

Order in regards to RECEIVED

"456-2015-CR-02672" rim 1 9 2015

i, man, declare; IAANCHES1EN DIM GCVO

No man lays claim of harm, injury or loss against i; to bear title of "defendant" and

"pro se" did, does and continues to cause harm to i;

i shall forgive all who trespass against i, as i would wish to be forgiven by those i

trespass upon;

i, wish, order and require the immediate discharge of "456-2015-CR-02672";

i say here and will verify in open court that all herein be true

Magistrate Court Clerk

Court Seal