the state of soot sensor technology

16
The State of Soot Sensor Technology EMA OBD Certification Workshop, April 25, 2013 Presenter: Patrick Thompson, CEO, EmiSense Technologies

Upload: hatu

Post on 27-Jan-2017

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The State of Soot Sensor Technology

The State of Soot Sensor Technology EMA OBD Certification Workshop, April 25, 2013 Presenter: Patrick Thompson, CEO, EmiSense Technologies

Page 2: The State of Soot Sensor Technology

2

Agenda

•  Background •  Overview of OBD Sensing Technologies •  Technical Challenges •  Recent Progress with Real Time Sensors •  Paths Forward for OBD Implementation

Page 3: The State of Soot Sensor Technology

3

Background •  This audience is aware of PM sensor regulatory drivers,

challenges, etc. •  The perspective presented here is that of a venture-backed startup

doing applied research, trying to solve technical challenges, and understand practical OEM problems

•  PM is very hard to measure (further complicated in situ) •  Mass, #, Volume? •  Particle Size, Charge & Morphology can impact

•  Sources include Southwest Research PSPD Consortium, UCR CERT, ACEA/Ricardo Study, OEM and Internal testing.

•  There are essentially 2 classes of viable direct PM OBD sensors: 1.  Accumulator sensors (resistive, capacitive, etc.) 2.  Real-time sensors (natural charge, induced charge, contact

charge, etc.)

Page 4: The State of Soot Sensor Technology

4

Accumulator Sensors •  Many suppliers are developing accumulators:

•  Denso •  Bosch •  Delphi •  NGK Insulators •  NGK Spark Plugs / NTK Technical Ceramics •  Continental •  Electricfil •  Stoneridge

•  Some suppliers appear to have hit development walls, but much work is ongoing to improve/address accumulator weaknesses.

•  On production vehicles starting MY2103

All Trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

Page 5: The State of Soot Sensor Technology

5

Accumulator Sensors

Source: Public presentations by suppliers. All copyrights are the property of their respective owners.

Page 6: The State of Soot Sensor Technology

6

Accumulator Sensors •  Can exhibit good correlation with integrated/cumulative plot of MSS

•  Weaknesses:

1.  High variability 2.  Response time 3.  Drift as a result of accumulation of conductive contamination

Page 7: The State of Soot Sensor Technology

7

Soot Conductivity & Ash •  Even small amounts of

inorganic impurities found in real diesel soot samples can create significant signal drift over time.

•  Exact composition of fuel and ash is unpredictable (Silica, Calcium, Zinc, Magnesium, etc.)

Source: Grob, B.; Schmid, J.; Ivleva, N.; Niessner, R; “Conductivity for Soot Sensing: Possibilities & Limitations” American Chemical Society 2012; 3586-3592

Conductivity as a function of mass fraction of graphite.

Page 8: The State of Soot Sensor Technology

8

Real Time Sensors •  Honeywell

•  Natural Charge •  Requiring very sensitive,

expensive electrometers (pA) •  Development may have stalled

•  Pegasor •  Active/Induced Charge •  Good performance •  Requiring very sensitive,

expensive electrometers (pA) •  Requiring relatively large and

complicated apparatus, challenging to cost-effectively reduce.

•  EmiSense •  See next slide

Page 9: The State of Soot Sensor Technology

9

PMTrac® Real Time Sensor •  Exhaust gas directed over steel HV electrode •  Field-directed assembly of soot provides amplification

(2-3 orders of magnitude), enables use of low-cost insulators and amplifiers

•  Field-induced disassembly maintains equilibrium •  Charge loss is proportional to soot concentration •  Tolerant of contaminants on the sensing electrode over

the lifetime of the sensor •  Real time response (200-500 millisecond range) •  Full model-based transfer function now developed

Page 10: The State of Soot Sensor Technology

10

Page 11: The State of Soot Sensor Technology

11

Heavy Duty Urban Drive Cycle at UCR

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600time (sec)

PM C

once

ntra

tion

(mg/

m^3

)

Sensor aSensor bSensor cSensor dSensor eSensor fSensor gTSI Dusttrak

PMTrac® Sensor •  SwRI 155 Tests, 6 sensors, Model-based Transfer Function R2 = .975 •  Drive cycle transient testing at both UCR and SwRI

Page 12: The State of Soot Sensor Technology

12

PMTrac® Summary and Next Steps •  Fundamentals becoming understood (see UCR PEMS presentation) •  Inherent durability advantage (extended validation in process) •  No cost disadvantage to resistive •  Weaknesses:

•  Not ready for 2014 applications •  2013 fundamentals and principle durability •  2014 production-intent samples (with Tier-1 partner) •  2015 Path to PPAP •  2016 SOP (for MY 2017+)

•  Particle size and charge dependencies •  Finite errors (+/- 35% range), requiring engine-family

characterization (feasible for OBD) •  Long term drift of PSD or PCD highly unlikely

Page 13: The State of Soot Sensor Technology

13

ACEA Perspective

Source: Savage, Scott; Ricardo; SAE Symposium ACEA HDD Soot Sensor Technology Survey and Performance; 2012

Page 14: The State of Soot Sensor Technology

14

Soot Sensor Technology Comparison

Sensor Cost Resolution Durability

Resistive Accumulators

2012-2017?

2017+

Field-Directed Equilibrium

Active Charger

Page 15: The State of Soot Sensor Technology

15

Conclusions

•  Commercially-available accumulators: •  Include risk of warranty issues (false + and -) •  Questionable if they meet present requirements •  Unlikely to meet requirements beyond 2016 •  But only option for near term

•  Real time PMTrac® sensors show promise in simplicity, resolution, and durability

•  If the author formed enforcement policy, OBD DPF-failure detection via direct measurement of PM would not be mandated until reliability of sensors was proven

Page 16: The State of Soot Sensor Technology

16

Thanks for Your Attention!

Questions?

Patrick Thompson

[email protected]