the state of the intranet survey -...
TRANSCRIPT
survey
The State of the Intranet Today
SPONSORED BY
2
Executive Summary In this survey, we wanted to find out if intranets are proving their worth
or if they are declining as a corporate “must have” technology.
The survey indicates that intranets are considered important, current
deployments are typically reflective of the lower end of maturity.
If intranets are to be seen as more valuable, then better support
for business processes would be a more direct path to delivering
business value, but we believe that these survey results suggest that
many are failing to fully leverage intranets as a tool for employee
engagement – a significant missed opportunity.
And even where the good technical foundations are in place or are
being upgraded, we are concerned about the lack of maturity around
sponsorship and vision, governance, and measurement. For this
reason, we recommend pursuing practical intranet strategies that
allow businesses to focus on the things that matter and help improve
their maturity.
3
This survey considers the question:
Are intranets proving their worth or are they declining as a
corporate “must have” technology?
Clearly the underlying goal of an intranet is to provide business value,
but what does this mean? CMSWire columnist Sam Marshall1 proposes
that an effective intranet is conceptually defined as one that helps bring
systems together:
“Saying that intranet value is about how employees feel may
seem counterintuitive -- surely it is about sales, profits and
customers. Although intranets that quantifiably support strategic
goals are great, in reality most intranets play a low-key but
essential day-to-day role in making employees more produc-
tive, and it is here that the real value lies. Indeed, things that are
core to a business tend to have systems that are more precisely
adapted to need (CRM, ERP and SCM). The role of the intranet is
to bind everything else together and fill the gaps.”
State of the intranet today
1. http://www.cmswire.com/cms/social-business/intranet-value-lies-in-employee-satisfaction-029162.php
4
But when participants in another CMSWire survey2 in June 2015 were
asked to define intranet success, they told us that success was measured
in tangible metrics. For example, they said that an intranet is successful
if 60% or more users view content at least once a day or 24% contribute
content of any kind once a day.
We recognize that intranets are complex business tools and this
question has many facets, so we have looked at the survey results
through the lens of an intranet maturity framework.
Our framework considers the following components of a business
improvement initiative:
Vision and objectives
Sponsorship and ownership
Intranet capabilities deployed, which include:
Functions and content offered
Platforms used
Management and support
Improvement planning
Taken together, these components give us the ability to check the
maturity of an intranet and how well it has been adopted in a business.
The survey responses provide insights into each of these aspects,
allowing an assessment of the current maturity of company intranets.
Let’s now look at the topics raised in the survey to check on the
current state.
2. http://www.cmswire.com/social-business/the-million-dollar-question-what-is-intranet-success/
5
The intranet’s relative priority
In our survey, the importance ranks highly, with 79% of respondents consid-
ering the intranet to be important, very important, or extremely important.
Forty-two percent considered it to be very or extremely important.
Intranets continue to be considered as important business tools and
if we consider them as a solution within the broader digital workplace
architecture, these results also compare well with CMSWire’s 2017 State
of the Digital Workplace Report3, where over 48% of respondents rank
the digital workplace as very or extremely important.
However, how well are we managing and implementing them so that they
deliver value?
How does the intranet rank in terms of your organization’s priorities?
Q7
Extremely Important
Very Important
Important
Slightly Important
Not Important
15.8%
25.7%
37.4%
16.4%
4.7%
3. https://www-cmswire.simplermedia.com/cw-sv-2017-dwx.html
6
Intranet ownership and maintenance
Over two-thirds of companies have a single department owning the
intranet, with IT owning 37% and Internal Communications 27%. No other
departments shows any significant ownership across our survey base.
It is interesting to note that some companies entrust the intranet
ownership to Knowledge Management or Digital Strategy. But it appears
that central functions control the intranet in most companies. We
also noticed that only two respondents indicated that ownership was
Which department is primarily responsible for managing your organization’s intranet?
Q4
Information Technology
Employee/Internal Communications
No single function has ownership
Marketing
Other
Human Resources
Operations
36.2%
26.7%
15.2%
8.6%
5.7%
4.3%
3.3%
Percentage of companies that have no single department owning the organization’s Intranet. (Broken down by company size)
Q8b
Large Companies
SmallCompanies
Mid-sizedCompanies
25%13%8%
Small companies (1-1000 employees)
Mid-sized companies (1001-5000 employees)
Large companies (5001+ employees)
7
shared between different functions, and again in both these cases it
was between the two dominant functions – IT and internal communi-
cations. Smaller organizations were also more likely to indicate that no
single function has ownership of the intranet, suggesting this was not a
strategic choice.
Intranet adoption and usage
Intranet adoption is critical but difficult to assess. Companies often set
their intranet home page as the default web browser start page, but is
just starting the browser with the intranet considered valuable usage?
Our respondents stated that their intranet achieved over 50% usage
daily, with an additional 29% stating usage weekly. This gives 80%
usage weekly or more.
Based on past surveys, 50% daily usage is barely considered success-
ful. 12% of respondents also said they didn’t know how frequently
their intranet was being used – this raises questions about how those
companies measure success.
How frequently do most employees use your intranet on average?
Q9
Daily 52.6%
Weekly 28.7%
Monthly 3.5%
Rarely 3.5%
Unsure / Don’t Know 11.7%
8
Integrations with other business applications
Integrating the intranet with other business apps is a key measure
of maturity. A large portion of the respondents have already linked
content-focused applications. There is more limited integration with
other lines of business apps and CRM systems.
Overall, we see bias toward content rather than business process with
less appetite for integrating systems such as Learning Management,
Expense Management, CRM, Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) and
other line of business transaction systems.
How does your intranet integrate with other employee applications?
Q12
ALREADY INTEGRATED
UNSURE / DON’T KNOW
NOT APPLICABLE
NOT INTEGRATED
PLANNING TO INTEGRATE
Document Management Box, Google Drive, Microsoft O�ce
Enterprise Search
Legacy Knowledge Management ToolsSharePoint, Wikis
Identity & Access ManagementOkta, OneLogin
Social, Chat & Collaboration ToolsSlack, HipChat, Yammer, Workplace by Facebook
HRMS & Human CapitalWorkday, SuccessFactors
Unified Communication & Conferencing Zoom, Skype for Business
Learning Management SystemsCornerstone
Expense ManagementConcur
CRM Salesforce
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) or line of business transaction systems
SAP
46.4% 13.6% 35.0% 2.7% 2.1%
46.8% 13.0% 28.8% 7.2% 4.3%
43.6% 14.3% 27.9% 12.1% 14.0%
48.6% 8.0% 23.9% 12.3% 7.3%
34.3% 16.4% 34.3% 13.6% 1.4%
33.1% 10.3% 42.7% 8.1% 5.9%
27.5% 17.4% 42.0% 10.9% 2.2%
23.7% 6.5% 46.0% 16.6% 7.2%
17.7% 7.4% 53.7% 15.4% 5.9%
12.9% 11.4% 54.3% 17.1% 4.3%
10.0% 5.7% 55.0% 18.6% 10.7%
9
Intranet technology adoption
The survey considered platform selection. The results showed a clear
distinction between those using SharePoint® (45%) and those using
another platform (44%) (with the remainder using hybrid deployments
or have no defined intranet).
As a single solution, the dominance of SharePoint is clear, although
respondents are using a wide range of versions from SharePoint Online
within Office 365, to SharePoint 2013 and 2010. Some respondents
were also using additional third-party add-ons to create their intranet in
SharePoint, while others augmented SharePoint with other non-Micro-
soft solutions.
While there were no other platforms that registered more than 5% of
the current installed market, we can see there is an active parallel install
base of organizations that do not use Microsoft as the platform for their
intranet. There was also more diversity of platforms at the smaller and
Which intranet platform(s) are you currently using?
Q5
SharePoint
45% 44% 11%
Some other platform
A hybrid deployment /
no definedintranet
10
larger organizations, while nearly 60% of mid-sized organizations (between
1,001 and 5,000 employees) use SharePoint or Office 365.
The evolving value of intranets
When considering what benefits an intranet brings to an organization, only
57% thought that the intranet helped worker productivity by providing
content and training. This means that 43% of respondents felt there was
no contribution to productivity with content delivery. Even less (50%), felt
that the intranet helped foster a sense of engagement to the organization.
There was very slight benefit for on-boarding or connecting coworkers,
although delivering company communications showed some benefits.
Which of the following do you consider the two most important benefits of an intranet?
Qsharepoint
Sharepoint / O�ce 365
Other
Engaging employees and
fostering a sense of
connection with the
organization
50%
40%
Improving productivity by managing and
sourcing critical content
and training
53%
45%
E�ciently administering
mandatory company
communica-tions
13%
23%
Helping employees find the appropriate
coworkers to connect with
17%
8%
11
Some respondents called out additional benefits, such as knowledge
management and collaboration, although these were not frequently
reported. We also found some curious differences in opinion between
organizations using SharePoint and those using other solutions: Those
using SharePoint were more likely to indicate they value employee
engagement, productivity, and connecting people; non-Microsoft
based intranets were more like to value the management of mandatory
communication than their Microsoft-based peers.
Measuring success
The results show that usage, survey scores, and the number of pages
visited are the most popular measures.
There is limited focus on time to locate pages and support calls, which
may reflect the difficulties of collecting or analyzing this information. More
critically, 30% had no success measures in place, although only 11% of large
enterprises reported this versus 34% of small and mid-sized organizations.
Percentage of companies that don’t measure their intranet success.
Q10
32%of small
companies
39%11%
of mid-sized companies
of large companies
Small companies (1-1000 employees)
Mid-sized companies (1001-5000 employees)
Large companies (5001+ employees)
12
Top intranet challenges
A range of challenges were offered in the survey, and the top two
reported by 50% of respondents were:
Complexity of use driven by multiple siloed systems of record
The inability to find content
To a lesser degree, the limited ability to integrate solutions and provide
integrated collaboration was also seen as an issue. Indications of limited
management interest were reflected in the responses for stale content
and low engagement by 30% of respondents.
16%
33%
13%
7%9%
14%
36%
30%
34%
Which of the following are your organization’s top three intranet challenges?
Q11
12%13%
7%
31%
24%
16%
33%35%
22%
16%17%18%
Heavy dependency
on IT resources
to maintain
18%17%
23%
Integration among various digital
workplace solutions
Cumbersome content
publishing process &
tools
16%.
26%
23%
Low engagement & adoption
Multiple siloed
systems of record
(databases, CRM, ERP,
Records Manage-
ment)
OtherFunctional limitations in current
platforms / technology
Stale and outdated content
Di�cult to search &
locate content
Small companies (1-1000 employees)
Mid-sized companies (1001-5000 employees)
Large companies (5001+ employees)
13
We also noticed that large enterprises were more likely to report problems
with integration among various digital workplace solutions, while mid-sized
organizations were more constrained by functional limitations and difficul-
ties with search.
Current State Commentary
Although the survey indicates that intranets are considered important,
current deployments are typically reflective of the lower end of maturity.
Size is a factor, the average company is delivering content and training, but
not neccesarily using it as an engagement tool. While we think that support-
ing business processes would be a more direct path to delivering business
value, we also believe that failing to fully leverage intranets as a tool for
employee engagement may be a missed opportunity in many cases.
It may be that the higher maturity objectives – like employee engage-
ment - are well down on the list because of the fundamental difficul-
ties many are still experiencing with content focused capabilities and
because they lack sophisticated measures to demonstrate the real
impact their intranet is having.
Considering this, it is not a surprise that we saw less interest in integrat-
ing business systems, like CRM and ERP. Respondents were more evenly
split for HCM and Unified Communications integration. This is probably
because HR is usually a shared service and collaboration is a business-
wide use case, making them a natural fit for intranet integration.
However, the fact that almost half of the respondents told us that they had
selected a new intranet in the past year or were expecting to replace their
intranet within the coming year could be taken to express two possible
14
scenarios – on the positive, intranet managers are able to secure funding
for platform renewal, but on the negative this high level of churn may
reflect a broad dissatisfaction with the technologies being used.
This dissatisfaction with technology outcomes may be a challenge for
mid-sized organizations, who reported a much higher use of SharePoint
but also were more likely to nominate functional limitations and difficul-
ties with search as one of their top three challenges.
What does the future look like?
Do the following statements reflect workplace trends impacting your
organization?
We posed several questions to capture trends affecting the intranet.
Our respondents noted the biggest challenges were:
Too much searching
Engagement
Looking more closely at these results, we found that small and mid-sized
organizations were generally more concerned about search, whereas
larger enterprises were equally concerned about search and employee
engagement.
These were closely followed by the growing remote workforce and the
complexity of the application environment. It was felt that working with
multiple generations in the workforce was significant but that the move
to contingent workforces is less significant.
15
Similar themes were seen in CMSWire’s 2017 State of the Digital Workplace
Report, which also ranked ‘culture and change’ and ‘search and information
findability’ in the top 5 digital workplace priorities.
Our insights
The employee engagement environment is getting more complex, and
it is unclear if many intranet solutions are ready for the changes that
are happening now. Even where the good technical foundations are
Do these statements reflect workplace trends impacting your organization? (Percentage of “yes” replies)
Q6
Increasing use of
freelanceand
contingent workers
make collaboration more di�cult
33%37%38%
Multi-generational
workplace makes
employee communica-
tions challenging
46%
59%
43%
Employee engagement
is a challenge
69%67%
59%
Employees spend too much time
searching for necessary
content
69%72%
67%
The abundance
of workplace software
applications is becoming
counter-productive
48%
.
61%59%
A growing number
of remote employees is a�ecting
internal communica-
tion & connection
61%59%
56%
Small companies (1-1000 employees)
Mid-sized companies (1001-5000 employees)
Large companies (5001+ employees)
16
in place or are being upgraded, we remain concerned about the lack
of maturity around sponsorship and vision, governance, and a lack of
success measurements.
Based on the results of this survey, we recommend pursuing practical
intranet strategies that as much as possible allow businesses to focus
on the things that matter and will help to improve their maturity.
This includes:
Placing a greater emphasis on employee engagement – For small
and mid-sized organizations not already thinking about this issue,
it may require shifting from an emphasis on broadcast and static
information sharing, to a more social or rich-content approach (such
as video).
Focusing content management efforts on findability – As well as
providing the right places to store content, it is just as important to
make sure this information can be found by the right people, at the
right time.
Demand access to resources and tools to support better
analytics and insight – Business stakeholders will never be
convinced by basic intranet statistics, but you will need access to the
right tools, data and possibly skills to paint a compelling picture – if
you are replacing your intranet and can argue to spend money on an
upgrade, make you sure include all the supporting capabilities.
Targeting simple business process integration – Taking baby
steps in the short-to-medium term and looking for quick wins or
easy integrations that add value without much pain or complexity.
For more mature intranets already actively focused on the employee experi-
ence, we believe ownership of the intranet should be a consideration moving
forward, if the goal is to provide a truly integrated employee experience.
17
About our RespondentsRespondents were invited to respond to an online survey between September
18 and October 13, 2017.
210 responses were collected, including organizations ranging in size from
small businesses to large enterprise employing over 100,000 people.
50,001-100,000 6.2%
10,000-50,000 4.3%
5,001-10,000 9.1%
1,001-5,000 24.3%
What is your organization's size? (In employee numbers)
Q1
1-100 26.1%
101-1,000 21.9%
100,000+ 8.1%
APPENDIX
18
A variety of industries were represented in the result, with a particular-
ly strong response from Information Technology followed by Consumer
Products and Health Care, Financial Services / Insurance, and Government.
Which of the following best describes your industry?
Q3
Information Technology
Banking / Financial Service / Insurance
Government
Consumer Products / Health Care
Telecommunication Services / Utilities
Logistics / Advertising / Education / Real Estate
Architecture / Construction
Energy
Primary Materials / Agriculture / Industrial
Other
23.3%
15.7%
10.9%
10.5%
4.3%
3.8%
2.9%
2.9%
1.9
23.8%
APPENDIX
19
ABOUT THE AUTHORS
James Dellow Passionate about changing the way the world gets work done, James specializes in human-centered technologies that help people connect, communicate and collaborate with each other.
He brings more than a decade of experience working in intranet and knowledge management roles and as a consultant with a wide range of government, professional and blue chip companies. James has helped clients with digital workplace strategy, intranet vendor selection, and has worked with a variety of platforms as a consultant advising on information architecture, governance, user experience, and content management.
James was awarded a Master of Business & Technology in 2005 and is the author of numerous published articles, including on CMSWire.
Robin Wall Robin Wall is an accomplished consulting professional, skilled in strategic consulting, program management, information manage-ment and business transformation. He specialises in digital transformation, taking his clients on the journey to high levels of digital maturity.
Robin successfully gains benefits from transformation projects, by effectively blending improvements in digital technology, data structures, business improvement and people upskilling.
Robin regularly runs public workshops on Information Manage-ment and Information Governance.
20
CMSWire, published by Simpler Media Group, Inc., provides news, advice and analysis for professionals driving digital content strategy, management, and marketing for leading organizations. More than 400 industry professionals and editors produce our authoritative and innovative analysis for a community of over 750,000 market influencers each quarter.
Coverage areas include digital and customer experience, digital marketing, social business and information management.
Learn more at www.cmswire.com
Simpplr is a modern employee intranet that drives employee productivity and engagement by creating an intelligent, engaging and integrated digital workplace. We take the abstract out of day-to-day communication, better enabling distributed teams to connect, share, and distribute ideas and information. Simpplr is trusted by leading brands including Box, Workday, DocuSign, Eurostar, and Columbia University to connect, engage and empower their employees. Simpplr is headquartered in Redwood City, CA with offices in the UK and India, and is backed by Norwest Venture Partners and Salesforce Ventures.
Learn more at www.simpplr.com
ABOUT US
ABOUT THE SPONSOR