the successful development of an ergonomics standard

23
The successful development of an ergonomics standard

Upload: russell-merritt

Post on 18-Jan-2016

219 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The successful development of an ergonomics standard

The successful development

of an ergonomics standard

Page 2: The successful development of an ergonomics standard

Criteria of success

Address the risk Match current knowledge Provide problem-solving

framework Provide equal protection Support of affected

communities

Page 3: The successful development of an ergonomics standard

“Ergonomics” claims - the impact

On average, each year 1/3 of all claims 26,200 claims 1,107,000 days lost $136,367,000 in claims

costs

Page 4: The successful development of an ergonomics standard

Review models Administrative Community In BC, community model

used with• 200 employer and worker

representatives• 125 health and safety

professionals• 30 consultative

committees

Page 5: The successful development of an ergonomics standard

The review process

Ergonomics subcommittee

Senior advisory committee

Governing body Public hearings

Page 6: The successful development of an ergonomics standard

The Vancouver Sun Sept 15

“Keyboard not necessarily the culprit in computer-related pain”

The Vancouver Province Sept 18

“A formula for confusion”

Nelson News, November 10

“Businesses condemn ergonomics”

The Vancouver Sun Sept 27“Ergonomic talks spur “big lies”, “tantrums”

Daily News Sept 22“Workers, employers at odds over WCB”

Business in Vancouver June 21-27

“Just when you thought WCB costs were high, here come

ergonomic regulations”

Daily News Sept 21“WCB workplace plans draw praise, criticism”

The Vancouver Sun, Dec 20“Draining the WCB’s poisonous wounds”

Page 7: The successful development of an ergonomics standard

Issues raised at hearings 1/3 of claims are musculoskeletal There are no regulations to protect workers MSIs cause extensive human suffering

Delink code from regulation Epidemic of claims may result Organization of work is a management matter Regulation will impact economy

Workplace factors of little significance There is no proof regulation will reduce

injuries Only existing general duty requirements are

needed

Page 8: The successful development of an ergonomics standard

Ergonomics (MSI) requirements

Riskidentification

Riskassessment

Risk controlEducationand training

Evaluation

Consultation

Page 9: The successful development of an ergonomics standard

Title: Ergonomics (MSI) requirements

Issues– professional ergonomist

perspective– limit of application– worker/employer perspective

Page 10: The successful development of an ergonomics standard

Scope

All workplaces

MSIs, not adverse health effects

Emphasis on sprains, strains and inflammations

Page 11: The successful development of an ergonomics standard

Risk/job factors

Used for both risk identification and assessment

18 factors in 5 groups

Groups physical demands layout and condition of the

workstation characteristics of objects handled environmental conditions organization of work

Page 12: The successful development of an ergonomics standard

Specific factorsa) Physical demands

•force•repetition•duration•work postures•local contact stresses

b) Workstation•working reaches•working heights•seating•floor surfaces

Page 13: The successful development of an ergonomics standard

c) Objects handled•size•shape•load condition•weight distribution•handles

d) Environmental conditions•e.g. cold temperature

e) Organization of work•work-recovery cycles•task variability•work rate

Page 14: The successful development of an ergonomics standard

Risk control

Eliminate or minimize risk

Engineering and administrative controls

Interim and permanent controls

Page 15: The successful development of an ergonomics standard

Education and training

Educate workers at risk of MSI–early signs and symptoms–potential health effects

Train workers in measures to control risk

Page 16: The successful development of an ergonomics standard

Evaluation

Monitor effectiveness

Annual evaluation

Correct deficiencies

Page 17: The successful development of an ergonomics standard

Consultation With committee or representative on

– risk identification, assessment and control– content and delivery of education and

training– evaluation of compliance measures

During a risk assessment, consult with

– workers with signs or symptoms of MSI– representative sample of workers doing the

work

Page 18: The successful development of an ergonomics standard

Support materials

Role of code of practice?

Prepare smaller documents on specific topics

– Applicability of risk factors– Understanding risks– Industry-specific codes– Policies and guidelines

Page 19: The successful development of an ergonomics standard

Impact of the new requirements

High profile Industry and labour initiatives Revised compensation

adjudication procedures Regulatory activity -

inspections and consultation Impact on claims

Page 20: The successful development of an ergonomics standard

Relative frequencies of orders

Risk identification Risk assessment Risk control Education and training Evaluation and consultation

Page 21: The successful development of an ergonomics standard

27282930313233343536

1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998

% of all claims due to overexertion and RMI

Page 22: The successful development of an ergonomics standard

In conclusion

The risk to worker health is massive

Ergonomics is sufficiently advanced to justify a standard

A standard is essential to a control strategy

A standard can be achieved

Page 23: The successful development of an ergonomics standard

Thank you

For further information on the standard and support materials,

contact the WCB website at

www.worksafebc.com